Loading...
00-555, CITY OF ST. PAUL FINAL ORDER ORIGINAL COUNCIL EILE NO. �� o o. �SS In the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction at the tollowing loca�ions: � 500099 - Both sides Van Buren Avenue from North Victoria Street to North Grotto Street. LAID OVER FROM MAY 24, 2000 *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Raconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$9.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $11.58 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.32 per square foot. Al1 corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. NNLTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $5.84 per square foot. under Preliminary order approved The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all e�enses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. Yeas �enanav � akey '�ostrom �leman �bs<ti.t' �Harris :.�antry �iter 45 Adopted by Council: Date�'l �o d Nays v � Certified Passed by Council Secretary � In Favor By � � . �.� -„ J O Against ��(��l�l ! �hS�v�,� y/�O/0� Mayor Works - Sidewalk Division GREEN �� � �f�1/UU °e s� r No. �I:��O'� ATE INfT7AVDATE _ ❑CRYCOUNGL _ ❑Cff`lCLEPK _ ❑FIN.&MGT.SERVICESDIR _ 0 Council Research I IDEPf.AC M "7- O DEPARIMENT DIREGTOR �CRYATfORNEY ' � WDGETDIflECTOR � MAYOR (OR ASSISTM77) 07ALlOFSIGNATUqEPAGES _ (GL14'ALLLOCATIONSFORSIGNANP� uASSOCIA7E 1C170NflEWESIED �, �! � � K Reconstruct Sidewalk in Wards t& 5(See attached list) - - ►- - ------ --- ._. �o� ._ .� _PLANNING COMMISSION __CIBCAMMfTTEE couNa� _ CH COUNQL OBJECfIVE? PROBLEM, 5i�1/Oo 'TUU PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING �UESTIONS: 1. Has ihis persoNfirtn ever worketl under a contract for Nis depanment? YES NO 2. Has this persoNfirtn ever been a city employee? YES NO 3. Does this persoNfirtn possess a slti�l not nortnally possessed by any curtent ciry employee? YES NO Ezplain all yes answers on separate sheet and attach to green sheet WHAT, WMEN, WIIERE. WH1�: The problem "defective sidewalk" was caused by multiple probiems, tree roots, poor subgrade materials, freeRhaw cycles, service life limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and corrected annualiy. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition wouid worsen to a state where it would be unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falis and possible litigations. IFAPPROVE�: The community will benefit from this project because it will provide safe defect free sidewalks for its citizens. The sidewalk contracts are done by private contractors generating public sector jobs as a resuit. IFAPPROVE�: Historically, the sidewalk reconstruction has created negative feedback because of construction procedures and assessments. Property owners question the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized. Having to assess for walk reconstruction remains a controversial issue. This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal injury suits, resulting in the expenditure of larger dol{ar amounis in repairs and replacement, as well as c4aim payouts. �, . �. ,, � « � �. 1�1Hi J � �� IOUNT OF7RANSACTION $ SS s U/S . UU COST/REVENUE BUDGETED (CIRCLE ONE) SOURCE OO A, PIA 00 = 620 �000 pCINITYNUMBER COO-ZT�S3-OT� NFORMATION:(EXPLAIN) B� AST = 3 5 �OOO � , C• C�6 �� = 5����� � - " `_.... j NO , CITY OF ST. PAUL FINAL ORDER ORIGINAL COUNCIL EILE NO. �� o o. �SS In the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction at the tollowing loca�ions: � 500099 - Both sides Van Buren Avenue from North Victoria Street to North Grotto Street. LAID OVER FROM MAY 24, 2000 *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Raconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$9.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $11.58 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.32 per square foot. Al1 corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. NNLTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $5.84 per square foot. under Preliminary order approved The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all e�enses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. Yeas �enanav � akey '�ostrom �leman �bs<ti.t' �Harris :.�antry �iter 45 Adopted by Council: Date�'l �o d Nays v � Certified Passed by Council Secretary � In Favor By � � . �.� -„ J O Against ��(��l�l ! �hS�v�,� y/�O/0� Mayor Works - Sidewalk Division GREEN �� � �f�1/UU °e s� r No. �I:��O'� ATE INfT7AVDATE _ ❑CRYCOUNGL _ ❑Cff`lCLEPK _ ❑FIN.&MGT.SERVICESDIR _ 0 Council Research I IDEPf.AC M "7- O DEPARIMENT DIREGTOR �CRYATfORNEY ' � WDGETDIflECTOR � MAYOR (OR ASSISTM77) 07ALlOFSIGNATUqEPAGES _ (GL14'ALLLOCATIONSFORSIGNANP� uASSOCIA7E 1C170NflEWESIED �, �! � � K Reconstruct Sidewalk in Wards t& 5(See attached list) - - ►- - ------ --- ._. �o� ._ .� _PLANNING COMMISSION __CIBCAMMfTTEE couNa� _ CH COUNQL OBJECfIVE? PROBLEM, 5i�1/Oo 'TUU PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING �UESTIONS: 1. Has ihis persoNfirtn ever worketl under a contract for Nis depanment? YES NO 2. Has this persoNfirtn ever been a city employee? YES NO 3. Does this persoNfirtn possess a slti�l not nortnally possessed by any curtent ciry employee? YES NO Ezplain all yes answers on separate sheet and attach to green sheet WHAT, WMEN, WIIERE. WH1�: The problem "defective sidewalk" was caused by multiple probiems, tree roots, poor subgrade materials, freeRhaw cycles, service life limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and corrected annualiy. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition wouid worsen to a state where it would be unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falis and possible litigations. IFAPPROVE�: The community will benefit from this project because it will provide safe defect free sidewalks for its citizens. The sidewalk contracts are done by private contractors generating public sector jobs as a resuit. IFAPPROVE�: Historically, the sidewalk reconstruction has created negative feedback because of construction procedures and assessments. Property owners question the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized. Having to assess for walk reconstruction remains a controversial issue. This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal injury suits, resulting in the expenditure of larger dol{ar amounis in repairs and replacement, as well as c4aim payouts. �, . �. ,, � « � �. 1�1Hi J � �� IOUNT OF7RANSACTION $ SS s U/S . UU COST/REVENUE BUDGETED (CIRCLE ONE) SOURCE OO A, PIA 00 = 620 �000 pCINITYNUMBER COO-ZT�S3-OT� NFORMATION:(EXPLAIN) B� AST = 3 5 �OOO � , C• C�6 �� = 5����� � - " `_.... j NO , CITY OF ST. PAUL FINAL ORDER ORIGINAL COUNCIL EILE NO. �� o o. �SS In the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction at the tollowing loca�ions: � 500099 - Both sides Van Buren Avenue from North Victoria Street to North Grotto Street. LAID OVER FROM MAY 24, 2000 *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Raconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$9.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $11.58 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.32 per square foot. Al1 corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. NNLTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $5.84 per square foot. under Preliminary order approved The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all e�enses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. Yeas �enanav � akey '�ostrom �leman �bs<ti.t' �Harris :.�antry �iter 45 Adopted by Council: Date�'l �o d Nays v � Certified Passed by Council Secretary � In Favor By � � . �.� -„ J O Against ��(��l�l ! �hS�v�,� y/�O/0� Mayor Works - Sidewalk Division GREEN �� � �f�1/UU °e s� r No. �I:��O'� ATE INfT7AVDATE _ ❑CRYCOUNGL _ ❑Cff`lCLEPK _ ❑FIN.&MGT.SERVICESDIR _ 0 Council Research I IDEPf.AC M "7- O DEPARIMENT DIREGTOR �CRYATfORNEY ' � WDGETDIflECTOR � MAYOR (OR ASSISTM77) 07ALlOFSIGNATUqEPAGES _ (GL14'ALLLOCATIONSFORSIGNANP� uASSOCIA7E 1C170NflEWESIED �, �! � � K Reconstruct Sidewalk in Wards t& 5(See attached list) - - ►- - ------ --- ._. �o� ._ .� _PLANNING COMMISSION __CIBCAMMfTTEE couNa� _ CH COUNQL OBJECfIVE? PROBLEM, 5i�1/Oo 'TUU PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING �UESTIONS: 1. Has ihis persoNfirtn ever worketl under a contract for Nis depanment? YES NO 2. Has this persoNfirtn ever been a city employee? YES NO 3. Does this persoNfirtn possess a slti�l not nortnally possessed by any curtent ciry employee? YES NO Ezplain all yes answers on separate sheet and attach to green sheet WHAT, WMEN, WIIERE. WH1�: The problem "defective sidewalk" was caused by multiple probiems, tree roots, poor subgrade materials, freeRhaw cycles, service life limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and corrected annualiy. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition wouid worsen to a state where it would be unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falis and possible litigations. IFAPPROVE�: The community will benefit from this project because it will provide safe defect free sidewalks for its citizens. The sidewalk contracts are done by private contractors generating public sector jobs as a resuit. IFAPPROVE�: Historically, the sidewalk reconstruction has created negative feedback because of construction procedures and assessments. Property owners question the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized. Having to assess for walk reconstruction remains a controversial issue. This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal injury suits, resulting in the expenditure of larger dol{ar amounis in repairs and replacement, as well as c4aim payouts. �, . �. ,, � « � �. 1�1Hi J � �� IOUNT OF7RANSACTION $ SS s U/S . UU COST/REVENUE BUDGETED (CIRCLE ONE) SOURCE OO A, PIA 00 = 620 �000 pCINITYNUMBER COO-ZT�S3-OT� NFORMATION:(EXPLAIN) B� AST = 3 5 �OOO � , C• C�6 �� = 5����� � - " `_.... j NO