Loading...
00-507CITSC OF ST. PAUI, FINAL ORDER 0 R I G i N A L COUN IL� FILE��TQy �� Sd7 �f0 �% r By Pq/`�, Fil No._500071-500075 Vot' g Ward 5, 6& 7 Ia the Matter of sidewalk recoastructioa, sidewalk raconstruction with iategral curb and/or aew sidawalk construction at the follawiag locations: 500071 - Northeast side Como Avenue from Atwater Street to Topping Street. 500072 - Both sides North Ha2e1 Street from East Nevada Avenue to East Nebraska Avenue. 500073 - Both sides East Nebraska Avenue from North Hazel Street to Furness Parkway. 500074 - Both sides East Nebraska Avenue from North White Bear Avenue to North Hazel Street. 500075 - North side Hudson Road from Forest Street to Cypress Street. O�=S�� QRIGI�IAL *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Recoastxuction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$9.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $11.58 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated acoordingly. Naw construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.32 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $5.84 per square foot. under Preliminary order �O -' �-� approved 3 � voa The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council o£ the City o£ Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all e�cpenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays �enanav ✓Blakey �ffostrom ,q� 1 eman vKarris �antry �R'eiter Adopted by Council: Date �. �o'� Certified Passed by Council Secretary �? In Favor By _ � Against \ I��osev�� .s/3�/ Mayor Works - Sidewalk Division BE ON CAUNCILAGENDA BY (DATE) FOR � �; 'f1�1�0� d�s�� GRE�N SHEET No. io275o INRIAUDATE INff1AUDAIE DEPAH7MEMDIRECTOR ❑CRYCOUNGII � CRYATfOPNEY ❑CITYCLERK BU06EfDIflECiOR ❑FlN.BAAGT.SERYICESDIR. MAYOR(ORASSISTANn � Council Research WRSIGNA7UR� I IASSOCIATE Reconstruct Sidewafk in Wards 5, 6& 7(See attached iist) r� 3. Does ihis person/firtn possess a skill not nortnally possessed by any current ciry employee? YES NO F�cplain all yes answers on separate shset and attach to green sheet The problem "defective sidewalk" was caused by multiple problems, tree roots, poor subgrade materials, free/thaw cycies, service i'rfe limits, chemical addftives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and corrected annually. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be unusabie and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from fails and possible litigations. The community will benefit from this project because it will provide safe defect free sidewalks for its citizens. The sidewalk contracts are done by private contractors generating public sector jobs as a resuft. DISADVANTAGES IF APPFiOVED� Historically, the sidewalk reconstruct+on has created negative feedback because of construction procedures and assessments. Property owners question the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized. Having to assess for walk reconstruction remains a controversial issue. DISADVANTAGE$ IF NOT APPROVED: This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal injury suits, resulting in the expenditure of Iarger dol�ar amounts in repairs and replacement, as well as claim payouts. FUNDINGSOURCE vv FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (IXPLAIN) DEPr. PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING �UESTIONS: qVILSERVICECOMMISSION 7, Hasthisperson/firtneverworkedunderacontractforthisdepartmentt YES NO 2. Has this persoNfirtn ever been a ciry employee? YES NO a � � ..� � - ��i ���� C, Cts oo = 50,000 COST/REVENUE BUDGETED (CIRCLE ONE) NUMBER � dd soa SUNIMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOA'IlVIENDATION Wazd 5 PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK N.E.S. COMO AVE. from Atwater St. to Topping St. ��' INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the D'uector of Public works as public necessity on the basis of two (2) complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is old tile with broken tile, holes in tile, asphalt patches, uneven tile, missing tile, and settled panels. d� so� SUMMARY OF ENGIIVEERING RECOD��NDATIONS Ward 6 PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. N. HAZEL ST. from E. Nevada Ave. to E. Montana Ave. 5 /1MA�IIQITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Warks as public vU� � necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, water pockets, settled, and cracked panels. PROTECT: RECON5TRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. E. NEBRASKA AVE. from N. Hazel St. to Fumess Pkwy. S WV�3 INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public works as public necessity on the basis of nine (9) complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, water pockets, offgrade, asphalt patches, scaled, settled, cracked, and uneven paneis. ......................................................................................................... PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. E. NEBRASKA AVE. from N. White Bear Ave. to 1V. Hazel St. ��� IIVITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of seven (7) complaints, a petition with one (1) signer and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, water pockets, asphalt patches, scaled, settled , cracked, and uneven panels. O�✓sd� SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOD�IlVIENDATION Wazd 7 PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK N.S. HUDSON RD. from Forest St. to Cypress St. y�� IIVITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public warks as public necessity on the basis of three (3) complaints, a petition with one (1) signer and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, and settied panels. 00 �o� CITY OF ST. PAUL COUN IL FI � N0. 00 ��"I�S. � PRELIMI23ARY ORDER By ( 1 �-Y �� Fil No. 500071 - 500075 0 R I G f N A L �o�i g Ward_ 5 , 6�� In the Matter of sidecvalk reconstruction, sidewalk reconstruction with integral curb andfor aew sidavralk eonstrucCion at the follovring locations: S00071 - Northeast side Como Avenue from Atwater Street to Topping Street. S00072 - Both sides North Hazel Street from East Nevada Avenue to East Nebraska Avenue. 500073 - Both sides East Nebraska Avenue from North Hazel Street to Furness PaYkway. 500074 - Both sides East Nebraska Avenue from North White Bear Avenue to North Hazel Street. 500075 - North side Hudson Road from Forest Street to Cypress Street. O�' �d9 ORIGINAL *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES �� RESIDENTSAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Racoastruction Sreplacement of old sidewalk) -$9.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $11.58 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. Al1 other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.32 per square foot. Al1 corner residential properties wi11 receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESTDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $5.84 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, � that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 2000 Public Improvement Aid. 2 3 That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 24 dav of Mav, 2000 5:30 o'clock P.M. in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time ancl place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays �enanav ✓ 3Tl akey �ostrom v�oleman ✓I�arris v�aritry ,/Aeiter � In Favor � Against Adopted by Council: Date�� Q 1�a� rF ' Certified Passed by Council Secretary BS' � � c> F Mayor CITSC OF ST. PAUI, FINAL ORDER 0 R I G i N A L COUN IL� FILE��TQy �� Sd7 �f0 �% r By Pq/`�, Fil No._500071-500075 Vot' g Ward 5, 6& 7 Ia the Matter of sidewalk recoastructioa, sidewalk raconstruction with iategral curb and/or aew sidawalk construction at the follawiag locations: 500071 - Northeast side Como Avenue from Atwater Street to Topping Street. 500072 - Both sides North Ha2e1 Street from East Nevada Avenue to East Nebraska Avenue. 500073 - Both sides East Nebraska Avenue from North Hazel Street to Furness Parkway. 500074 - Both sides East Nebraska Avenue from North White Bear Avenue to North Hazel Street. 500075 - North side Hudson Road from Forest Street to Cypress Street. O�=S�� QRIGI�IAL *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Recoastxuction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$9.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $11.58 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated acoordingly. Naw construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.32 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $5.84 per square foot. under Preliminary order �O -' �-� approved 3 � voa The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council o£ the City o£ Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all e�cpenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays �enanav ✓Blakey �ffostrom ,q� 1 eman vKarris �antry �R'eiter Adopted by Council: Date �. �o'� Certified Passed by Council Secretary �? In Favor By _ � Against \ I��osev�� .s/3�/ Mayor Works - Sidewalk Division BE ON CAUNCILAGENDA BY (DATE) FOR � �; 'f1�1�0� d�s�� GRE�N SHEET No. io275o INRIAUDATE INff1AUDAIE DEPAH7MEMDIRECTOR ❑CRYCOUNGII � CRYATfOPNEY ❑CITYCLERK BU06EfDIflECiOR ❑FlN.BAAGT.SERYICESDIR. MAYOR(ORASSISTANn � Council Research WRSIGNA7UR� I IASSOCIATE Reconstruct Sidewafk in Wards 5, 6& 7(See attached iist) r� 3. Does ihis person/firtn possess a skill not nortnally possessed by any current ciry employee? YES NO F�cplain all yes answers on separate shset and attach to green sheet The problem "defective sidewalk" was caused by multiple problems, tree roots, poor subgrade materials, free/thaw cycies, service i'rfe limits, chemical addftives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and corrected annually. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be unusabie and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from fails and possible litigations. The community will benefit from this project because it will provide safe defect free sidewalks for its citizens. The sidewalk contracts are done by private contractors generating public sector jobs as a resuft. DISADVANTAGES IF APPFiOVED� Historically, the sidewalk reconstruct+on has created negative feedback because of construction procedures and assessments. Property owners question the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized. Having to assess for walk reconstruction remains a controversial issue. DISADVANTAGE$ IF NOT APPROVED: This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal injury suits, resulting in the expenditure of Iarger dol�ar amounts in repairs and replacement, as well as claim payouts. FUNDINGSOURCE vv FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (IXPLAIN) DEPr. PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING �UESTIONS: qVILSERVICECOMMISSION 7, Hasthisperson/firtneverworkedunderacontractforthisdepartmentt YES NO 2. Has this persoNfirtn ever been a ciry employee? YES NO a � � ..� � - ��i ���� C, Cts oo = 50,000 COST/REVENUE BUDGETED (CIRCLE ONE) NUMBER � dd soa SUNIMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOA'IlVIENDATION Wazd 5 PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK N.E.S. COMO AVE. from Atwater St. to Topping St. ��' INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the D'uector of Public works as public necessity on the basis of two (2) complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is old tile with broken tile, holes in tile, asphalt patches, uneven tile, missing tile, and settled panels. d� so� SUMMARY OF ENGIIVEERING RECOD��NDATIONS Ward 6 PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. N. HAZEL ST. from E. Nevada Ave. to E. Montana Ave. 5 /1MA�IIQITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Warks as public vU� � necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, water pockets, settled, and cracked panels. PROTECT: RECON5TRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. E. NEBRASKA AVE. from N. Hazel St. to Fumess Pkwy. S WV�3 INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public works as public necessity on the basis of nine (9) complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, water pockets, offgrade, asphalt patches, scaled, settled, cracked, and uneven paneis. ......................................................................................................... PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. E. NEBRASKA AVE. from N. White Bear Ave. to 1V. Hazel St. ��� IIVITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of seven (7) complaints, a petition with one (1) signer and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, water pockets, asphalt patches, scaled, settled , cracked, and uneven panels. O�✓sd� SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOD�IlVIENDATION Wazd 7 PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK N.S. HUDSON RD. from Forest St. to Cypress St. y�� IIVITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public warks as public necessity on the basis of three (3) complaints, a petition with one (1) signer and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, and settied panels. 00 �o� CITY OF ST. PAUL COUN IL FI � N0. 00 ��"I�S. � PRELIMI23ARY ORDER By ( 1 �-Y �� Fil No. 500071 - 500075 0 R I G f N A L �o�i g Ward_ 5 , 6�� In the Matter of sidecvalk reconstruction, sidewalk reconstruction with integral curb andfor aew sidavralk eonstrucCion at the follovring locations: S00071 - Northeast side Como Avenue from Atwater Street to Topping Street. S00072 - Both sides North Hazel Street from East Nevada Avenue to East Nebraska Avenue. 500073 - Both sides East Nebraska Avenue from North Hazel Street to Furness PaYkway. 500074 - Both sides East Nebraska Avenue from North White Bear Avenue to North Hazel Street. 500075 - North side Hudson Road from Forest Street to Cypress Street. O�' �d9 ORIGINAL *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES �� RESIDENTSAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Racoastruction Sreplacement of old sidewalk) -$9.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $11.58 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. Al1 other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.32 per square foot. Al1 corner residential properties wi11 receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESTDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $5.84 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, � that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 2000 Public Improvement Aid. 2 3 That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 24 dav of Mav, 2000 5:30 o'clock P.M. in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time ancl place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays �enanav ✓ 3Tl akey �ostrom v�oleman ✓I�arris v�aritry ,/Aeiter � In Favor � Against Adopted by Council: Date�� Q 1�a� rF ' Certified Passed by Council Secretary BS' � � c> F Mayor CITSC OF ST. PAUI, FINAL ORDER 0 R I G i N A L COUN IL� FILE��TQy �� Sd7 �f0 �% r By Pq/`�, Fil No._500071-500075 Vot' g Ward 5, 6& 7 Ia the Matter of sidewalk recoastructioa, sidewalk raconstruction with iategral curb and/or aew sidawalk construction at the follawiag locations: 500071 - Northeast side Como Avenue from Atwater Street to Topping Street. 500072 - Both sides North Ha2e1 Street from East Nevada Avenue to East Nebraska Avenue. 500073 - Both sides East Nebraska Avenue from North Hazel Street to Furness Parkway. 500074 - Both sides East Nebraska Avenue from North White Bear Avenue to North Hazel Street. 500075 - North side Hudson Road from Forest Street to Cypress Street. O�=S�� QRIGI�IAL *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Recoastxuction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$9.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $11.58 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated acoordingly. Naw construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.32 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $5.84 per square foot. under Preliminary order �O -' �-� approved 3 � voa The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council o£ the City o£ Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all e�cpenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays �enanav ✓Blakey �ffostrom ,q� 1 eman vKarris �antry �R'eiter Adopted by Council: Date �. �o'� Certified Passed by Council Secretary �? In Favor By _ � Against \ I��osev�� .s/3�/ Mayor Works - Sidewalk Division BE ON CAUNCILAGENDA BY (DATE) FOR � �; 'f1�1�0� d�s�� GRE�N SHEET No. io275o INRIAUDATE INff1AUDAIE DEPAH7MEMDIRECTOR ❑CRYCOUNGII � CRYATfOPNEY ❑CITYCLERK BU06EfDIflECiOR ❑FlN.BAAGT.SERYICESDIR. MAYOR(ORASSISTANn � Council Research WRSIGNA7UR� I IASSOCIATE Reconstruct Sidewafk in Wards 5, 6& 7(See attached iist) r� 3. Does ihis person/firtn possess a skill not nortnally possessed by any current ciry employee? YES NO F�cplain all yes answers on separate shset and attach to green sheet The problem "defective sidewalk" was caused by multiple problems, tree roots, poor subgrade materials, free/thaw cycies, service i'rfe limits, chemical addftives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and corrected annually. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be unusabie and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from fails and possible litigations. The community will benefit from this project because it will provide safe defect free sidewalks for its citizens. The sidewalk contracts are done by private contractors generating public sector jobs as a resuft. DISADVANTAGES IF APPFiOVED� Historically, the sidewalk reconstruct+on has created negative feedback because of construction procedures and assessments. Property owners question the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized. Having to assess for walk reconstruction remains a controversial issue. DISADVANTAGE$ IF NOT APPROVED: This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal injury suits, resulting in the expenditure of Iarger dol�ar amounts in repairs and replacement, as well as claim payouts. FUNDINGSOURCE vv FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (IXPLAIN) DEPr. PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING �UESTIONS: qVILSERVICECOMMISSION 7, Hasthisperson/firtneverworkedunderacontractforthisdepartmentt YES NO 2. Has this persoNfirtn ever been a ciry employee? YES NO a � � ..� � - ��i ���� C, Cts oo = 50,000 COST/REVENUE BUDGETED (CIRCLE ONE) NUMBER � dd soa SUNIMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOA'IlVIENDATION Wazd 5 PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK N.E.S. COMO AVE. from Atwater St. to Topping St. ��' INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the D'uector of Public works as public necessity on the basis of two (2) complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is old tile with broken tile, holes in tile, asphalt patches, uneven tile, missing tile, and settled panels. d� so� SUMMARY OF ENGIIVEERING RECOD��NDATIONS Ward 6 PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. N. HAZEL ST. from E. Nevada Ave. to E. Montana Ave. 5 /1MA�IIQITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Warks as public vU� � necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, water pockets, settled, and cracked panels. PROTECT: RECON5TRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. E. NEBRASKA AVE. from N. Hazel St. to Fumess Pkwy. S WV�3 INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public works as public necessity on the basis of nine (9) complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, water pockets, offgrade, asphalt patches, scaled, settled, cracked, and uneven paneis. ......................................................................................................... PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. E. NEBRASKA AVE. from N. White Bear Ave. to 1V. Hazel St. ��� IIVITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of seven (7) complaints, a petition with one (1) signer and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, water pockets, asphalt patches, scaled, settled , cracked, and uneven panels. O�✓sd� SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOD�IlVIENDATION Wazd 7 PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK N.S. HUDSON RD. from Forest St. to Cypress St. y�� IIVITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public warks as public necessity on the basis of three (3) complaints, a petition with one (1) signer and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, and settied panels. 00 �o� CITY OF ST. PAUL COUN IL FI � N0. 00 ��"I�S. � PRELIMI23ARY ORDER By ( 1 �-Y �� Fil No. 500071 - 500075 0 R I G f N A L �o�i g Ward_ 5 , 6�� In the Matter of sidecvalk reconstruction, sidewalk reconstruction with integral curb andfor aew sidavralk eonstrucCion at the follovring locations: S00071 - Northeast side Como Avenue from Atwater Street to Topping Street. S00072 - Both sides North Hazel Street from East Nevada Avenue to East Nebraska Avenue. 500073 - Both sides East Nebraska Avenue from North Hazel Street to Furness PaYkway. 500074 - Both sides East Nebraska Avenue from North White Bear Avenue to North Hazel Street. 500075 - North side Hudson Road from Forest Street to Cypress Street. O�' �d9 ORIGINAL *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES �� RESIDENTSAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Racoastruction Sreplacement of old sidewalk) -$9.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $11.58 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. Al1 other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.32 per square foot. Al1 corner residential properties wi11 receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESTDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $5.84 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, � that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 2000 Public Improvement Aid. 2 3 That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 24 dav of Mav, 2000 5:30 o'clock P.M. in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time ancl place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays �enanav ✓ 3Tl akey �ostrom v�oleman ✓I�arris v�aritry ,/Aeiter � In Favor � Against Adopted by Council: Date�� Q 1�a� rF ' Certified Passed by Council Secretary BS' � � c> F Mayor