Loading...
00-505��.��.a ��, CITY OF ST. PAUL M� ay,a000 FINAL ORDER 0 R 1 G I f� A L COUN L�FIL�. !Jd �!/� BY 3 � Fi No._500067-500070 Vo ng Ward_2 & 5 Ia tha Matter of sidavralk reconstructioa, sidawalk reconstructioa with intagral curh and/or new sidewal�c coastruction at the folloariag locations: 500067 - Both sides East Jessamine Avenue from Jessie Street to Edgerton Street_ 50006& - West side Rice Street from West Hyacinth Avenue to South 164 feet. 500070 - Both sides Bay Street from James Avenue to Palace Avenue. � 04-S�s ORlGI�AL *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstsuction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$9.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $11.58 per front foot for a six (6) £oot wide walk. All other widths wi11 be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.32 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $5.84 per square foot. under Preliminary order v0 -- a-OCo The Council of the City of 5aint Paul has conducted a pubYic hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council o£ the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate a11 expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays ✓�enanav ./Blakey ,iBostrom V�bSer�- --Coleman ✓FIarris .�Lantry ,�Yeiter Adopted by Council: Date a ao 00 Certified Passed by Council Secretary ` In Favor By � . /� � Against � �if.ri l ���.\ � ✓ �� MaYor R�; �I�iIQ� ��so� Works - Sidewalk Division = INRIATED 0-00 Tvedt i OFSIGNAiLRE PAGES IOCATONS FOR SIGNA7UF� GREEN SHEET NO. 102748 INfilAl(DAlE INRIAWATE _ �DEPAHiMENTDIRECTOR ❑CENCOUNCIL �GRVATfORNEY ❑C[IYCIERK I� BUOGET DIRECTOR ❑ FIN.B MGT. SEflVICES DIR OMAY�R(ORASSI5TPN'n �CouncilResearch I I ASSOGATE I I DEPr. AC UN� �- Reconstruct Sidewalk, Reconstruct Sidewalk Wdh Integral Curb & ConsWct New Sidewalk in Wards 2& 5(See attached list) � CIVIL SEfiNGE CqMMISSION PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUS7 ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUE5TIONS: t. Has this persorJfirm ever worked untler a contract for this depar[ment? YES NO 2. Has this persoNfirtn ever been a ciry employee? YES NO 3. Does this persoNfirtn possess a sltill not nortnally possessetl by any curtent ciry employee? YES NO Explain all yes answers on separete sheet and attach to green sheet �D5 Z�- 5 I PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPORTUNITY (WHO, WHAT, WMEN, WHERE. WHY). The problem "defective sidewalk" was caused by multiple problems, tree roots, poor subgrade materials, freefthaw cycles, service life �imits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and corrected annually. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition wouid worsen to a state where it would be unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations. IF APPROVED: The community will benefit from this project because it will provide safe defect free sidewatks for its citizens. The sidewalk contracts are done by private contractors generating public sector jobs as a result. Historically, the sidewalk reconstruction has created negative feedback because of construction procedures and assessments. Property owners question the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-half the assessmeni is City subsidized. Having to assess for walk reconstruction remains a controversial issue. IF NOT APPHOVED. This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal injury suits, resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in repairs and replacement, as well as claim payouts. . ��Q��TC�3 ��'?;Bi' �,�� � ".� ��Q� fOTAL AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION $ a e , COST/REVENUE BUDGETED (CIRCLE ONE) YES No FUNDINGSOUBCE 00-M-D671 R � # pqNITYNUMBER C00-2T753-0784-00000 FINANCIALINFORMATION:(EXPLAIN) • � � C, CIB ao = 50,000 D� sds SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMIVIENDATIONS Wazd 5 PRO.TECT: IiECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. E. 7ESSAMINE AVE. from Jessie St. to Edgerton St. 5 o�I� IlVITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public works as public � necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, settled,and cracked panels. PR0.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK WITH INTEGRAL CURB W.S. RICE ST. from W. Hyacinth Ave. to S. 164'. 5 /1/�Nl� INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public �������/V necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with heaves, offgrade panels, asphalt patches, settled, cracked, and uneven panels. PROTECT: RECONSTRUCT EXISTING SIDEWALK & CONSTRUCT NEW SIDEWALK E.S. RICE ST. from W. Montana Ave. to W. Hoyt Ave. 5(1{��q INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public vwY � necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint and an inspection of the walk. This walk as old ffie which is broken, has holes, and is offgrade. !d-�s SLIMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMI��NDATION Ward 2 PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. BAY ST. from 7ames Ave. to Palace Ave. IAIITTATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public works as public f,� necessity on the basis of six (6) complaints, a petition with one (1) signer and an inspection of the r/ walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, scaled, settled, cracked, and uneven panels. Od sos CITY OF ST. PAUL PRELIMII3ARY ORDER ORIGINAL COUN IL FI�� NO. OO ��{�13 By ` ao Fil No. 500067 - 500070 Voting Ward_ 2 & 5 Ia the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction, sidewalk reconstruction with iatagral curb and/or naw sidawalk construction at the following locations: 500067 - Both sides East Jessamine Avenue from Jessie Street to Edgerton Street. 500068 - West side Rice Street from West Hyacinth Avenue to South 164 feet. 500069 - East side Rice Street from West Montana Avenue to West Hoyt Avenue. 500070 - Both sides Bay Street from James Avenue to Palace Avenue. OREGI(�IAL *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES ��-sdS- -o0-��,3--- RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$9.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $11.58 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100g of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.32 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. M[JLTI-RESIDENTIAL(MOre than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $5.84 per square foot. The Council of the City of 5aint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, � that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 2000 Public Improvement Aid. 2. 3 That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 24 dav of Mav, 2000 5:30 o'clock P.M. in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Cour� House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas / Nays ✓Benanav t/�lakey �ostrom r�2oleman �rris �antry �Keiter � In Favor �_Agains t Adopted by Council: Date�c�d a Certified Passed by Council Secretary By ��� c7 � _ — �> - - c Mayor ��.��.a ��, CITY OF ST. PAUL M� ay,a000 FINAL ORDER 0 R 1 G I f� A L COUN L�FIL�. !Jd �!/� BY 3 � Fi No._500067-500070 Vo ng Ward_2 & 5 Ia tha Matter of sidavralk reconstructioa, sidawalk reconstructioa with intagral curh and/or new sidewal�c coastruction at the folloariag locations: 500067 - Both sides East Jessamine Avenue from Jessie Street to Edgerton Street_ 50006& - West side Rice Street from West Hyacinth Avenue to South 164 feet. 500070 - Both sides Bay Street from James Avenue to Palace Avenue. � 04-S�s ORlGI�AL *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstsuction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$9.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $11.58 per front foot for a six (6) £oot wide walk. All other widths wi11 be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.32 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $5.84 per square foot. under Preliminary order v0 -- a-OCo The Council of the City of 5aint Paul has conducted a pubYic hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council o£ the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate a11 expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays ✓�enanav ./Blakey ,iBostrom V�bSer�- --Coleman ✓FIarris .�Lantry ,�Yeiter Adopted by Council: Date a ao 00 Certified Passed by Council Secretary ` In Favor By � . /� � Against � �if.ri l ���.\ � ✓ �� MaYor R�; �I�iIQ� ��so� Works - Sidewalk Division = INRIATED 0-00 Tvedt i OFSIGNAiLRE PAGES IOCATONS FOR SIGNA7UF� GREEN SHEET NO. 102748 INfilAl(DAlE INRIAWATE _ �DEPAHiMENTDIRECTOR ❑CENCOUNCIL �GRVATfORNEY ❑C[IYCIERK I� BUOGET DIRECTOR ❑ FIN.B MGT. SEflVICES DIR OMAY�R(ORASSI5TPN'n �CouncilResearch I I ASSOGATE I I DEPr. AC UN� �- Reconstruct Sidewalk, Reconstruct Sidewalk Wdh Integral Curb & ConsWct New Sidewalk in Wards 2& 5(See attached list) � CIVIL SEfiNGE CqMMISSION PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUS7 ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUE5TIONS: t. Has this persorJfirm ever worked untler a contract for this depar[ment? YES NO 2. Has this persoNfirtn ever been a ciry employee? YES NO 3. Does this persoNfirtn possess a sltill not nortnally possessetl by any curtent ciry employee? YES NO Explain all yes answers on separete sheet and attach to green sheet �D5 Z�- 5 I PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPORTUNITY (WHO, WHAT, WMEN, WHERE. WHY). The problem "defective sidewalk" was caused by multiple problems, tree roots, poor subgrade materials, freefthaw cycles, service life �imits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and corrected annually. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition wouid worsen to a state where it would be unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations. IF APPROVED: The community will benefit from this project because it will provide safe defect free sidewatks for its citizens. The sidewalk contracts are done by private contractors generating public sector jobs as a result. Historically, the sidewalk reconstruction has created negative feedback because of construction procedures and assessments. Property owners question the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-half the assessmeni is City subsidized. Having to assess for walk reconstruction remains a controversial issue. IF NOT APPHOVED. This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal injury suits, resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in repairs and replacement, as well as claim payouts. . ��Q��TC�3 ��'?;Bi' �,�� � ".� ��Q� fOTAL AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION $ a e , COST/REVENUE BUDGETED (CIRCLE ONE) YES No FUNDINGSOUBCE 00-M-D671 R � # pqNITYNUMBER C00-2T753-0784-00000 FINANCIALINFORMATION:(EXPLAIN) • � � C, CIB ao = 50,000 D� sds SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMIVIENDATIONS Wazd 5 PRO.TECT: IiECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. E. 7ESSAMINE AVE. from Jessie St. to Edgerton St. 5 o�I� IlVITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public works as public � necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, settled,and cracked panels. PR0.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK WITH INTEGRAL CURB W.S. RICE ST. from W. Hyacinth Ave. to S. 164'. 5 /1/�Nl� INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public �������/V necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with heaves, offgrade panels, asphalt patches, settled, cracked, and uneven panels. PROTECT: RECONSTRUCT EXISTING SIDEWALK & CONSTRUCT NEW SIDEWALK E.S. RICE ST. from W. Montana Ave. to W. Hoyt Ave. 5(1{��q INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public vwY � necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint and an inspection of the walk. This walk as old ffie which is broken, has holes, and is offgrade. !d-�s SLIMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMI��NDATION Ward 2 PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. BAY ST. from 7ames Ave. to Palace Ave. IAIITTATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public works as public f,� necessity on the basis of six (6) complaints, a petition with one (1) signer and an inspection of the r/ walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, scaled, settled, cracked, and uneven panels. Od sos CITY OF ST. PAUL PRELIMII3ARY ORDER ORIGINAL COUN IL FI�� NO. OO ��{�13 By ` ao Fil No. 500067 - 500070 Voting Ward_ 2 & 5 Ia the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction, sidewalk reconstruction with iatagral curb and/or naw sidawalk construction at the following locations: 500067 - Both sides East Jessamine Avenue from Jessie Street to Edgerton Street. 500068 - West side Rice Street from West Hyacinth Avenue to South 164 feet. 500069 - East side Rice Street from West Montana Avenue to West Hoyt Avenue. 500070 - Both sides Bay Street from James Avenue to Palace Avenue. OREGI(�IAL *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES ��-sdS- -o0-��,3--- RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$9.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $11.58 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100g of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.32 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. M[JLTI-RESIDENTIAL(MOre than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $5.84 per square foot. The Council of the City of 5aint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, � that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 2000 Public Improvement Aid. 2. 3 That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 24 dav of Mav, 2000 5:30 o'clock P.M. in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Cour� House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas / Nays ✓Benanav t/�lakey �ostrom r�2oleman �rris �antry �Keiter � In Favor �_Agains t Adopted by Council: Date�c�d a Certified Passed by Council Secretary By ��� c7 � _ — �> - - c Mayor ��.��.a ��, CITY OF ST. PAUL M� ay,a000 FINAL ORDER 0 R 1 G I f� A L COUN L�FIL�. !Jd �!/� BY 3 � Fi No._500067-500070 Vo ng Ward_2 & 5 Ia tha Matter of sidavralk reconstructioa, sidawalk reconstructioa with intagral curh and/or new sidewal�c coastruction at the folloariag locations: 500067 - Both sides East Jessamine Avenue from Jessie Street to Edgerton Street_ 50006& - West side Rice Street from West Hyacinth Avenue to South 164 feet. 500070 - Both sides Bay Street from James Avenue to Palace Avenue. � 04-S�s ORlGI�AL *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstsuction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$9.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $11.58 per front foot for a six (6) £oot wide walk. All other widths wi11 be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.32 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $5.84 per square foot. under Preliminary order v0 -- a-OCo The Council of the City of 5aint Paul has conducted a pubYic hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council o£ the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate a11 expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays ✓�enanav ./Blakey ,iBostrom V�bSer�- --Coleman ✓FIarris .�Lantry ,�Yeiter Adopted by Council: Date a ao 00 Certified Passed by Council Secretary ` In Favor By � . /� � Against � �if.ri l ���.\ � ✓ �� MaYor R�; �I�iIQ� ��so� Works - Sidewalk Division = INRIATED 0-00 Tvedt i OFSIGNAiLRE PAGES IOCATONS FOR SIGNA7UF� GREEN SHEET NO. 102748 INfilAl(DAlE INRIAWATE _ �DEPAHiMENTDIRECTOR ❑CENCOUNCIL �GRVATfORNEY ❑C[IYCIERK I� BUOGET DIRECTOR ❑ FIN.B MGT. SEflVICES DIR OMAY�R(ORASSI5TPN'n �CouncilResearch I I ASSOGATE I I DEPr. AC UN� �- Reconstruct Sidewalk, Reconstruct Sidewalk Wdh Integral Curb & ConsWct New Sidewalk in Wards 2& 5(See attached list) � CIVIL SEfiNGE CqMMISSION PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUS7 ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUE5TIONS: t. Has this persorJfirm ever worked untler a contract for this depar[ment? YES NO 2. Has this persoNfirtn ever been a ciry employee? YES NO 3. Does this persoNfirtn possess a sltill not nortnally possessetl by any curtent ciry employee? YES NO Explain all yes answers on separete sheet and attach to green sheet �D5 Z�- 5 I PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPORTUNITY (WHO, WHAT, WMEN, WHERE. WHY). The problem "defective sidewalk" was caused by multiple problems, tree roots, poor subgrade materials, freefthaw cycles, service life �imits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and corrected annually. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition wouid worsen to a state where it would be unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations. IF APPROVED: The community will benefit from this project because it will provide safe defect free sidewatks for its citizens. The sidewalk contracts are done by private contractors generating public sector jobs as a result. Historically, the sidewalk reconstruction has created negative feedback because of construction procedures and assessments. Property owners question the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-half the assessmeni is City subsidized. Having to assess for walk reconstruction remains a controversial issue. IF NOT APPHOVED. This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal injury suits, resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in repairs and replacement, as well as claim payouts. . ��Q��TC�3 ��'?;Bi' �,�� � ".� ��Q� fOTAL AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION $ a e , COST/REVENUE BUDGETED (CIRCLE ONE) YES No FUNDINGSOUBCE 00-M-D671 R � # pqNITYNUMBER C00-2T753-0784-00000 FINANCIALINFORMATION:(EXPLAIN) • � � C, CIB ao = 50,000 D� sds SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMIVIENDATIONS Wazd 5 PRO.TECT: IiECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. E. 7ESSAMINE AVE. from Jessie St. to Edgerton St. 5 o�I� IlVITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public works as public � necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, settled,and cracked panels. PR0.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK WITH INTEGRAL CURB W.S. RICE ST. from W. Hyacinth Ave. to S. 164'. 5 /1/�Nl� INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public �������/V necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with heaves, offgrade panels, asphalt patches, settled, cracked, and uneven panels. PROTECT: RECONSTRUCT EXISTING SIDEWALK & CONSTRUCT NEW SIDEWALK E.S. RICE ST. from W. Montana Ave. to W. Hoyt Ave. 5(1{��q INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public vwY � necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint and an inspection of the walk. This walk as old ffie which is broken, has holes, and is offgrade. !d-�s SLIMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMI��NDATION Ward 2 PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. BAY ST. from 7ames Ave. to Palace Ave. IAIITTATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public works as public f,� necessity on the basis of six (6) complaints, a petition with one (1) signer and an inspection of the r/ walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, scaled, settled, cracked, and uneven panels. Od sos CITY OF ST. PAUL PRELIMII3ARY ORDER ORIGINAL COUN IL FI�� NO. OO ��{�13 By ` ao Fil No. 500067 - 500070 Voting Ward_ 2 & 5 Ia the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction, sidewalk reconstruction with iatagral curb and/or naw sidawalk construction at the following locations: 500067 - Both sides East Jessamine Avenue from Jessie Street to Edgerton Street. 500068 - West side Rice Street from West Hyacinth Avenue to South 164 feet. 500069 - East side Rice Street from West Montana Avenue to West Hoyt Avenue. 500070 - Both sides Bay Street from James Avenue to Palace Avenue. OREGI(�IAL *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES ��-sdS- -o0-��,3--- RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$9.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $11.58 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100g of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.32 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. M[JLTI-RESIDENTIAL(MOre than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $5.84 per square foot. The Council of the City of 5aint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, � that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 2000 Public Improvement Aid. 2. 3 That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 24 dav of Mav, 2000 5:30 o'clock P.M. in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Cour� House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas / Nays ✓Benanav t/�lakey �ostrom r�2oleman �rris �antry �Keiter � In Favor �_Agains t Adopted by Council: Date�c�d a Certified Passed by Council Secretary By ��� c7 � _ — �> - - c Mayor