Loading...
00-411CITY OF ST. PAUL .. F=�. °�ER 0 R! G I NA L COUNCI F E N . 00 • �� By File No._500036-500045 Voting Ward_2 In the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction at the following locations: 500036 - Both sides South Chatsworth Street from St. Clair Avenue to Linwood Avenue. 500037 - Both sides Fairmount Avenue from South Chatsworth Street to South Milton Street. 500038 - Both sides South Grotto Street from Osceola Avenue to Fairmount Avenue. S00039 - South side James Avenue from Bay Street to South Osceola Avenue. 500040 - Both sides Linwood Avenue from South Chatsworth Street to South Milton Street. 500041 - Both sides Linwood Avenue from South Milton Street to South Victoria Street. 500042 - Both sides South Milton Street from St. Clair Avenue to Linwood Avenue. S00043 - Both sides Osceola Avenue from South Avon Street to South Grotto Street. 500044 - North side St. Clair Avenue from South Milton Street to South Victoria Street. 500045 - Both sides Sturgis Street from Garfield Street to Douglas Street. 00 -�\\ *ESTIMATED CON5TRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$9.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $11.58 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide wa1k. A11 other widths wi11 be prorated accordingly. Diew coastruction (where no walk existed) - 1000 of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.32 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RE5IDENTIAL (MOre than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $5.84 per square foot. under Preliminary order Q d � approved �� S.� d c°� c7 The Council of the City of Saint Pau1 has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recox�unendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all e�penses incurred therein and sha11 report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COiSNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays ✓Benanav ✓�lakey �ostrom �oleman ,�Harri s �antry �YFeiter Adopted by Council: Date � 00 Certified Passed by Council Secretary i In Favor By � .✓4� � Against ��/��/i���l/U%// �/���� Mayor si/ �'� �J`$ � : Works - Sidewalk Division �T PERSON 8 PHONE Tvedf (266-6087} E ON COUNQLAGENDA BV (DATE) � OFSIGNATUHEPAGES Sidewalk in Ward 2(See attached list) _PIANNING CAMMISSION _GB CAMMISTEE ? STAFF FOp SIGNAiUFE) CINL SFAVICE CAMMISSION _oistn�crcourta� _ ">UPPORTS WHICH COUNQL OBJECTiVE? I� DEPARiMENT DIRECTOR I�CfiYATfOFNEY � WDGEf WRECTOR '� MAVOR �DA ASSISTAtJT) NO. 102744 �Nmnvoa� ❑Cf1YCOUNCIL ❑GITYCLERK " ❑ FIN. 8 MGT. SERVICES DIR � Council Research PERSONAL SERVICE CONFRAC7S MU5F ANSWER THE FOLLAWING QUESTIONS: 1. HasthisQersorJfircneverworketlunderacontrac[forthisdepartment? YES NO 2. Has this person/5rm ever been a city employee? VES NO 3. Does this person/firtn possess e skill rwt nortnally possessed by any curtem city employee? YES NO Explain all yes answers on separete sheet antl attach to green sheet OPPORTUNITY(W410, WHAT. WMEN, WHERE, WHY): The problem "defective sidewalk" was caused by multiple problems, tree roots, poor subgrade materials, freekhaw cycles, service life limits, cheroical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and corrected annuatly Left uncorrected the sidewalk condition,would worsen to a state where it would be unusabfe and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations. The community wiN benefit from this projec4 because it will provide safe defect free sidewalks for its citizens. The sidewalk contracts are done by private contractoes generating public sector jobs as a result. Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback because of construction procedures and assessments. Property owners questiort the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-haif the assessment is City subsidized. Having to assess for walk reconstruction rernains a corrtroversial issue. (�:?� 1 y E ¢ T �JV:� �'v�: G�.vl Fm�.'�i 6�. E$ IF NOT APPROVE�: This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewafk stock to deteriorate, which in tum, will generate more personal injury suits, resulting in the expe�diture of larger dollar amounts in repairs and replacement, as weli as ciaim payouts. C`,e�:4°a��S .�i858?"G�1 ��?�'�! ` ` i OFTRANSACTIONS S`1�6 COSAREVENUEBUDGETE�(CIRCLEONE) m FuNwe+GSOURCE UO-M-O671 A, P(A OO = 2O,QOO pCrrvrrvruuMBER FINANCIALINFORMATION'(p(PLAIN) S� AST = + 0 0 � C. CIB 00 = 50,oQ0 Oo -4�� SUMIYIARY OF ENGINEERING REC011�VIENDATIONS Ward 2 �►r � PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. S. CHATSWORTH ST. from St. Clair Ave. to Linwood Ave. II�TITIAT`I1�G ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public works as public necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint and an inspection of the walk. This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches and cracked panels. ......................................................................................................... , ir� , +�� I ' PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. FAII2MOUNT AVE. from S. Chatsworth St. to S. Milton St. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as pubiic necessity on he basis of one (1) complaint and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, scaled, settled and cracked panels. PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. S. GROTTO ST, from Osceola Ave, to Fairmount Ave. IIVITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of an inspection of the wa1k. Th3s walk is poured conctete with tree heaves, water pockets, ,�,� � settled, cracked and uneven panels. PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT 5IDEWALK S.S. Jr1MES AVE. from Bay St. to S. Osceola Ave. INITIATING ACTION: This order was inivated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of four (4) complaints and an inspection of the walk. O O -�{�� -2- 'This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, ��� � settled, uneven and cracked panels. PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. LINWOOD AVE. from S. Cbatsworth St. to S. Milton St. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the D"uector of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of eight (8) complaints and an inspection of the wa1k. This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, �j� ��� settled, cracked and uneven panels. PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. LINWOOD AVE. from S. Milton St. to S. Victoria St. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, scaled, settled and cracked panels. PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.5. S. MILTON ST. from St. Clair Ave. to Linwood Ave. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Warks as pubiic necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint and an inspection of the walk. This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves and asphait patches. � �� PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. OSCEOLA AVE. from S. Avon St. to S. Grotto St. IIVITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director or Public Works as public necessity on the basis of a petition with one (1) signer and an inspecuoa of the waik. O O -�{�� -3- � r�� EXISTING CONDITIONS: This waik is poured concrete with water pockets, settled and cracked panels. PRO.TECT: RECONSTRi3CT SIDEWALK N.5. ST. CLAIR AVE. from S. Miltan St. to S. Victoria St. ITTITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the D'uector of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of two (2) complaints and an inspection of the walk. This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves and asphalt patches. 'r� PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. STURGIS ST. from G�eld St. to Douglas St. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, scaled, settled, cracked and uneven panels. CITY OF ST. PAIIL PRELIMIN7iitY ORDER 00 -4\\ COUNCIL F E �.309 By File No._500036 - S00045 Voting Ward 2_ ia tha Matter of sidawalk recoastructioa at the followiag locations: 3a S00036 - Both sides South Chatsworth Street from 5t. Clair Avenue to Linwood Avenue. 500037 - Both sides Fairmount Avenue from South Chatsworth Street to South Milton Street. 500035 - Both sides South Grotto Street from Osceola Avenue to Fairmount Avenue. 500039 - South side James Avenue from Bay Street to South Osceola Avenue. 500040 - Both sides Linwood Avenue from South Chatsworth Street to South Milton Street. S00041 - Both sides Linwood Avenue from South Milton Street to South Victoria Street. S00042 - Both sides South Milton Street from St. Clair Avenue to Linwood Avenue. 500043 - Both sides Osceola Avenue from South Avon Street to South Grot[o Street. 500�44 - North side St. Clair Avenue from South Milton Street to South Victoria Street. 500045 - Both sides Sturgis Street from Garfield Street to Douglas Street. ee-�vq -� � � *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATE5 RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Recoastzuction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$9.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $11.58 per fzont foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.32 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" o� the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTZAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $5.84 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report o£ the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, � that the estimated cost thereof is *5EE ABOVE £or estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 2000 Public Improvement Aid. 2 3 That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 26 dav of April, 2000 5:30 o'clock P.M. in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature o£ the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays �bs�'�' -� Benanav v8 �s trom e�2oleman �Tarri s ,�antry �eiter G In Favor �,_Against 1 �s�,.� Adopted by Council: Date Sc�� oEl Certified Passed by Council Secretary By � c� � � ��_ Mayor CITY OF ST. PAUL .. F=�. °�ER 0 R! G I NA L COUNCI F E N . 00 • �� By File No._500036-500045 Voting Ward_2 In the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction at the following locations: 500036 - Both sides South Chatsworth Street from St. Clair Avenue to Linwood Avenue. 500037 - Both sides Fairmount Avenue from South Chatsworth Street to South Milton Street. 500038 - Both sides South Grotto Street from Osceola Avenue to Fairmount Avenue. S00039 - South side James Avenue from Bay Street to South Osceola Avenue. 500040 - Both sides Linwood Avenue from South Chatsworth Street to South Milton Street. 500041 - Both sides Linwood Avenue from South Milton Street to South Victoria Street. 500042 - Both sides South Milton Street from St. Clair Avenue to Linwood Avenue. S00043 - Both sides Osceola Avenue from South Avon Street to South Grotto Street. 500044 - North side St. Clair Avenue from South Milton Street to South Victoria Street. 500045 - Both sides Sturgis Street from Garfield Street to Douglas Street. 00 -�\\ *ESTIMATED CON5TRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$9.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $11.58 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide wa1k. A11 other widths wi11 be prorated accordingly. Diew coastruction (where no walk existed) - 1000 of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.32 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RE5IDENTIAL (MOre than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $5.84 per square foot. under Preliminary order Q d � approved �� S.� d c°� c7 The Council of the City of Saint Pau1 has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recox�unendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all e�penses incurred therein and sha11 report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COiSNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays ✓Benanav ✓�lakey �ostrom �oleman ,�Harri s �antry �YFeiter Adopted by Council: Date � 00 Certified Passed by Council Secretary i In Favor By � .✓4� � Against ��/��/i���l/U%// �/���� Mayor si/ �'� �J`$ � : Works - Sidewalk Division �T PERSON 8 PHONE Tvedf (266-6087} E ON COUNQLAGENDA BV (DATE) � OFSIGNATUHEPAGES Sidewalk in Ward 2(See attached list) _PIANNING CAMMISSION _GB CAMMISTEE ? STAFF FOp SIGNAiUFE) CINL SFAVICE CAMMISSION _oistn�crcourta� _ ">UPPORTS WHICH COUNQL OBJECTiVE? I� DEPARiMENT DIRECTOR I�CfiYATfOFNEY � WDGEf WRECTOR '� MAVOR �DA ASSISTAtJT) NO. 102744 �Nmnvoa� ❑Cf1YCOUNCIL ❑GITYCLERK " ❑ FIN. 8 MGT. SERVICES DIR � Council Research PERSONAL SERVICE CONFRAC7S MU5F ANSWER THE FOLLAWING QUESTIONS: 1. HasthisQersorJfircneverworketlunderacontrac[forthisdepartment? YES NO 2. Has this person/5rm ever been a city employee? VES NO 3. Does this person/firtn possess e skill rwt nortnally possessed by any curtem city employee? YES NO Explain all yes answers on separete sheet antl attach to green sheet OPPORTUNITY(W410, WHAT. WMEN, WHERE, WHY): The problem "defective sidewalk" was caused by multiple problems, tree roots, poor subgrade materials, freekhaw cycles, service life limits, cheroical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and corrected annuatly Left uncorrected the sidewalk condition,would worsen to a state where it would be unusabfe and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations. The community wiN benefit from this projec4 because it will provide safe defect free sidewalks for its citizens. The sidewalk contracts are done by private contractoes generating public sector jobs as a result. Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback because of construction procedures and assessments. Property owners questiort the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-haif the assessment is City subsidized. Having to assess for walk reconstruction rernains a corrtroversial issue. (�:?� 1 y E ¢ T �JV:� �'v�: G�.vl Fm�.'�i 6�. E$ IF NOT APPROVE�: This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewafk stock to deteriorate, which in tum, will generate more personal injury suits, resulting in the expe�diture of larger dollar amounts in repairs and replacement, as weli as ciaim payouts. C`,e�:4°a��S .�i858?"G�1 ��?�'�! ` ` i OFTRANSACTIONS S`1�6 COSAREVENUEBUDGETE�(CIRCLEONE) m FuNwe+GSOURCE UO-M-O671 A, P(A OO = 2O,QOO pCrrvrrvruuMBER FINANCIALINFORMATION'(p(PLAIN) S� AST = + 0 0 � C. CIB 00 = 50,oQ0 Oo -4�� SUMIYIARY OF ENGINEERING REC011�VIENDATIONS Ward 2 �►r � PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. S. CHATSWORTH ST. from St. Clair Ave. to Linwood Ave. II�TITIAT`I1�G ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public works as public necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint and an inspection of the walk. This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches and cracked panels. ......................................................................................................... , ir� , +�� I ' PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. FAII2MOUNT AVE. from S. Chatsworth St. to S. Milton St. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as pubiic necessity on he basis of one (1) complaint and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, scaled, settled and cracked panels. PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. S. GROTTO ST, from Osceola Ave, to Fairmount Ave. IIVITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of an inspection of the wa1k. Th3s walk is poured conctete with tree heaves, water pockets, ,�,� � settled, cracked and uneven panels. PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT 5IDEWALK S.S. Jr1MES AVE. from Bay St. to S. Osceola Ave. INITIATING ACTION: This order was inivated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of four (4) complaints and an inspection of the walk. O O -�{�� -2- 'This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, ��� � settled, uneven and cracked panels. PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. LINWOOD AVE. from S. Cbatsworth St. to S. Milton St. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the D"uector of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of eight (8) complaints and an inspection of the wa1k. This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, �j� ��� settled, cracked and uneven panels. PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. LINWOOD AVE. from S. Milton St. to S. Victoria St. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, scaled, settled and cracked panels. PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.5. S. MILTON ST. from St. Clair Ave. to Linwood Ave. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Warks as pubiic necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint and an inspection of the walk. This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves and asphait patches. � �� PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. OSCEOLA AVE. from S. Avon St. to S. Grotto St. IIVITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director or Public Works as public necessity on the basis of a petition with one (1) signer and an inspecuoa of the waik. O O -�{�� -3- � r�� EXISTING CONDITIONS: This waik is poured concrete with water pockets, settled and cracked panels. PRO.TECT: RECONSTRi3CT SIDEWALK N.5. ST. CLAIR AVE. from S. Miltan St. to S. Victoria St. ITTITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the D'uector of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of two (2) complaints and an inspection of the walk. This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves and asphalt patches. 'r� PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. STURGIS ST. from G�eld St. to Douglas St. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, scaled, settled, cracked and uneven panels. CITY OF ST. PAIIL PRELIMIN7iitY ORDER 00 -4\\ COUNCIL F E �.309 By File No._500036 - S00045 Voting Ward 2_ ia tha Matter of sidawalk recoastructioa at the followiag locations: 3a S00036 - Both sides South Chatsworth Street from 5t. Clair Avenue to Linwood Avenue. 500037 - Both sides Fairmount Avenue from South Chatsworth Street to South Milton Street. 500035 - Both sides South Grotto Street from Osceola Avenue to Fairmount Avenue. 500039 - South side James Avenue from Bay Street to South Osceola Avenue. 500040 - Both sides Linwood Avenue from South Chatsworth Street to South Milton Street. S00041 - Both sides Linwood Avenue from South Milton Street to South Victoria Street. S00042 - Both sides South Milton Street from St. Clair Avenue to Linwood Avenue. 500043 - Both sides Osceola Avenue from South Avon Street to South Grot[o Street. 500�44 - North side St. Clair Avenue from South Milton Street to South Victoria Street. 500045 - Both sides Sturgis Street from Garfield Street to Douglas Street. ee-�vq -� � � *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATE5 RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Recoastzuction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$9.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $11.58 per fzont foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.32 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" o� the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTZAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $5.84 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report o£ the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, � that the estimated cost thereof is *5EE ABOVE £or estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 2000 Public Improvement Aid. 2 3 That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 26 dav of April, 2000 5:30 o'clock P.M. in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature o£ the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays �bs�'�' -� Benanav v8 �s trom e�2oleman �Tarri s ,�antry �eiter G In Favor �,_Against 1 �s�,.� Adopted by Council: Date Sc�� oEl Certified Passed by Council Secretary By � c� � � ��_ Mayor CITY OF ST. PAUL .. F=�. °�ER 0 R! G I NA L COUNCI F E N . 00 • �� By File No._500036-500045 Voting Ward_2 In the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction at the following locations: 500036 - Both sides South Chatsworth Street from St. Clair Avenue to Linwood Avenue. 500037 - Both sides Fairmount Avenue from South Chatsworth Street to South Milton Street. 500038 - Both sides South Grotto Street from Osceola Avenue to Fairmount Avenue. S00039 - South side James Avenue from Bay Street to South Osceola Avenue. 500040 - Both sides Linwood Avenue from South Chatsworth Street to South Milton Street. 500041 - Both sides Linwood Avenue from South Milton Street to South Victoria Street. 500042 - Both sides South Milton Street from St. Clair Avenue to Linwood Avenue. S00043 - Both sides Osceola Avenue from South Avon Street to South Grotto Street. 500044 - North side St. Clair Avenue from South Milton Street to South Victoria Street. 500045 - Both sides Sturgis Street from Garfield Street to Douglas Street. 00 -�\\ *ESTIMATED CON5TRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$9.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $11.58 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide wa1k. A11 other widths wi11 be prorated accordingly. Diew coastruction (where no walk existed) - 1000 of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.32 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RE5IDENTIAL (MOre than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $5.84 per square foot. under Preliminary order Q d � approved �� S.� d c°� c7 The Council of the City of Saint Pau1 has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recox�unendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all e�penses incurred therein and sha11 report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COiSNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays ✓Benanav ✓�lakey �ostrom �oleman ,�Harri s �antry �YFeiter Adopted by Council: Date � 00 Certified Passed by Council Secretary i In Favor By � .✓4� � Against ��/��/i���l/U%// �/���� Mayor si/ �'� �J`$ � : Works - Sidewalk Division �T PERSON 8 PHONE Tvedf (266-6087} E ON COUNQLAGENDA BV (DATE) � OFSIGNATUHEPAGES Sidewalk in Ward 2(See attached list) _PIANNING CAMMISSION _GB CAMMISTEE ? STAFF FOp SIGNAiUFE) CINL SFAVICE CAMMISSION _oistn�crcourta� _ ">UPPORTS WHICH COUNQL OBJECTiVE? I� DEPARiMENT DIRECTOR I�CfiYATfOFNEY � WDGEf WRECTOR '� MAVOR �DA ASSISTAtJT) NO. 102744 �Nmnvoa� ❑Cf1YCOUNCIL ❑GITYCLERK " ❑ FIN. 8 MGT. SERVICES DIR � Council Research PERSONAL SERVICE CONFRAC7S MU5F ANSWER THE FOLLAWING QUESTIONS: 1. HasthisQersorJfircneverworketlunderacontrac[forthisdepartment? YES NO 2. Has this person/5rm ever been a city employee? VES NO 3. Does this person/firtn possess e skill rwt nortnally possessed by any curtem city employee? YES NO Explain all yes answers on separete sheet antl attach to green sheet OPPORTUNITY(W410, WHAT. WMEN, WHERE, WHY): The problem "defective sidewalk" was caused by multiple problems, tree roots, poor subgrade materials, freekhaw cycles, service life limits, cheroical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and corrected annuatly Left uncorrected the sidewalk condition,would worsen to a state where it would be unusabfe and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations. The community wiN benefit from this projec4 because it will provide safe defect free sidewalks for its citizens. The sidewalk contracts are done by private contractoes generating public sector jobs as a result. Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback because of construction procedures and assessments. Property owners questiort the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-haif the assessment is City subsidized. Having to assess for walk reconstruction rernains a corrtroversial issue. (�:?� 1 y E ¢ T �JV:� �'v�: G�.vl Fm�.'�i 6�. E$ IF NOT APPROVE�: This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewafk stock to deteriorate, which in tum, will generate more personal injury suits, resulting in the expe�diture of larger dollar amounts in repairs and replacement, as weli as ciaim payouts. C`,e�:4°a��S .�i858?"G�1 ��?�'�! ` ` i OFTRANSACTIONS S`1�6 COSAREVENUEBUDGETE�(CIRCLEONE) m FuNwe+GSOURCE UO-M-O671 A, P(A OO = 2O,QOO pCrrvrrvruuMBER FINANCIALINFORMATION'(p(PLAIN) S� AST = + 0 0 � C. CIB 00 = 50,oQ0 Oo -4�� SUMIYIARY OF ENGINEERING REC011�VIENDATIONS Ward 2 �►r � PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. S. CHATSWORTH ST. from St. Clair Ave. to Linwood Ave. II�TITIAT`I1�G ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public works as public necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint and an inspection of the walk. This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches and cracked panels. ......................................................................................................... , ir� , +�� I ' PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. FAII2MOUNT AVE. from S. Chatsworth St. to S. Milton St. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as pubiic necessity on he basis of one (1) complaint and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, scaled, settled and cracked panels. PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. S. GROTTO ST, from Osceola Ave, to Fairmount Ave. IIVITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of an inspection of the wa1k. Th3s walk is poured conctete with tree heaves, water pockets, ,�,� � settled, cracked and uneven panels. PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT 5IDEWALK S.S. Jr1MES AVE. from Bay St. to S. Osceola Ave. INITIATING ACTION: This order was inivated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of four (4) complaints and an inspection of the walk. O O -�{�� -2- 'This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, ��� � settled, uneven and cracked panels. PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. LINWOOD AVE. from S. Cbatsworth St. to S. Milton St. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the D"uector of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of eight (8) complaints and an inspection of the wa1k. This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, �j� ��� settled, cracked and uneven panels. PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. LINWOOD AVE. from S. Milton St. to S. Victoria St. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, scaled, settled and cracked panels. PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.5. S. MILTON ST. from St. Clair Ave. to Linwood Ave. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Warks as pubiic necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint and an inspection of the walk. This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves and asphait patches. � �� PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. OSCEOLA AVE. from S. Avon St. to S. Grotto St. IIVITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director or Public Works as public necessity on the basis of a petition with one (1) signer and an inspecuoa of the waik. O O -�{�� -3- � r�� EXISTING CONDITIONS: This waik is poured concrete with water pockets, settled and cracked panels. PRO.TECT: RECONSTRi3CT SIDEWALK N.5. ST. CLAIR AVE. from S. Miltan St. to S. Victoria St. ITTITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the D'uector of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of two (2) complaints and an inspection of the walk. This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves and asphalt patches. 'r� PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. STURGIS ST. from G�eld St. to Douglas St. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, scaled, settled, cracked and uneven panels. CITY OF ST. PAIIL PRELIMIN7iitY ORDER 00 -4\\ COUNCIL F E �.309 By File No._500036 - S00045 Voting Ward 2_ ia tha Matter of sidawalk recoastructioa at the followiag locations: 3a S00036 - Both sides South Chatsworth Street from 5t. Clair Avenue to Linwood Avenue. 500037 - Both sides Fairmount Avenue from South Chatsworth Street to South Milton Street. 500035 - Both sides South Grotto Street from Osceola Avenue to Fairmount Avenue. 500039 - South side James Avenue from Bay Street to South Osceola Avenue. 500040 - Both sides Linwood Avenue from South Chatsworth Street to South Milton Street. S00041 - Both sides Linwood Avenue from South Milton Street to South Victoria Street. S00042 - Both sides South Milton Street from St. Clair Avenue to Linwood Avenue. 500043 - Both sides Osceola Avenue from South Avon Street to South Grot[o Street. 500�44 - North side St. Clair Avenue from South Milton Street to South Victoria Street. 500045 - Both sides Sturgis Street from Garfield Street to Douglas Street. ee-�vq -� � � *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATE5 RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Recoastzuction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$9.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $11.58 per fzont foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.32 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" o� the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTZAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $5.84 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report o£ the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, � that the estimated cost thereof is *5EE ABOVE £or estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 2000 Public Improvement Aid. 2 3 That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 26 dav of April, 2000 5:30 o'clock P.M. in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature o£ the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays �bs�'�' -� Benanav v8 �s trom e�2oleman �Tarri s ,�antry �eiter G In Favor �,_Against 1 �s�,.� Adopted by Council: Date Sc�� oEl Certified Passed by Council Secretary By � c� � � ��_ Mayor