The URL can be used to link to this page

99-755t CITY OF ST. PAUL COUNCIL FILE N0. �� ,d�S / y� FINAL ORDER 0 R l G! N AL By File o. �9094 Voting Wa 5 In the idatter of sidesvalk reaonstruction at the followiag locations: 599097 - Both sides Charles Avenue from North Syndicate Street to North Griggs Street_ Laid ovar from Julv 28, 1449 *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reoonstxuctian (replacement of old sidewalk) -$8.65 per £ront foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $10.38 per £ront foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. A11 other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.87 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $5.23 per square foot. under Preliminary order approved The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Pau1 does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to prooeed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers sha11 calculate a11 e�enses incurred therein and sha11 report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays �nanav �'Sakey Bostrom..- P,bs�r� :�oleman �arris �antry vF�ei ter i? In Favor �_Against i i�hs��t Adopted by Council: Date � q� Certified Passed by Council Secretary or �� ; Works Sidewalks :T PEFiSON & PHONE Tvedt - 266-6087 E ON G04NCILAGENDA f �� 9- .� ' � ��' S"Z� 0�+1�5 ATEO GREEN SHEET No. � wRwuoa're irvmama're �OEPAKTMENTOIRECTOR ❑CRYWUNQL WR �CRYATfORNEY ❑CITYCLFAK ' � BUOGET DIflEGfOR � FlN. & MGT. SERVICES DIR. �MAYOR(ORASSISTANTj � (�,p{��{� Research �LSOF5IGNATUftEPAGE$ � _ (CLIPALLLOCATIONSFOk51GNATUq� u ASSOGIATE 7MENfqLpCCp�(�fiqNl ON RE�UESTED � � � � � - Reconstruct Sidewatk in Wards 1, 2, 5 S 6(See attached list) �� 'S 5� �9� —�g �D4 °v�R T� r� M�ar,�t� )MMENDA770N5: Apptova (A) w Fejert (Fi) pERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS: PIANNfNGCOMMISSION _GMLSERVICECOMMISSION }, HasihispersoNfi�meverworkedunderacront2Mforihisdepartment? ................._.- YES NO COUNCIL _ CH COUNCIL O&IECTIVE4 S I.L.Sd-I WHAT, WHEN. WHERE, WHYJ: 2. Has this persoNfirm ever been a ciry empioyee? YES NO 3. Does Ihis psrsoNfirtn possess a slull not nortnally possessed by any curtent ciry employee? YES NO Explain aii yes answers on separete sheet and attach to green sheet The problem "defective sidewalk" was caused by multiple problems, tree roots, poor subgrade materials, freezeRhaw cycles, service tife limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and corrected annually. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations. IFAPPFOVE�: The community will benefit from this project because it wiil provide safe defect free sidewalks for iis citizens. The sidewalk contracts are done by private contractors generating private sector jobs as a result. Historica4ly, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback because of consiruction procedures and assessments. Property owners question the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized. Having to assess for walk reconstruction remains a controversiai issue. This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in tum, wili generate more personal injury suits, resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in repairs and replacement, as well as claim payouts. CGUt�Cff �BS��i�i': �84�� ; �Y, �-:r r.a? h'. AMOUNTQFTRANSACiIONY (b�bll,`jZ COS7IREVENUEBUDGETED(CIRCLEONE) YES No iGSOURCE 99-Ft-o669 A, PIA 99 = 30 �00� pCiNffYNUMBER C99-2T752-0784-00000 ALINFORMAiION:(E7(P141N) B� AST = 35 �O O c. cis 99 = 50,000 t CITY OF ST. PAUL COUNCIL FILE N0. �� ,d�S / y� FINAL ORDER 0 R l G! N AL By File o. �9094 Voting Wa 5 In the idatter of sidesvalk reaonstruction at the followiag locations: 599097 - Both sides Charles Avenue from North Syndicate Street to North Griggs Street_ Laid ovar from Julv 28, 1449 *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reoonstxuctian (replacement of old sidewalk) -$8.65 per £ront foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $10.38 per £ront foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. A11 other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.87 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $5.23 per square foot. under Preliminary order approved The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Pau1 does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to prooeed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers sha11 calculate a11 e�enses incurred therein and sha11 report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays �nanav �'Sakey Bostrom..- P,bs�r� :�oleman �arris �antry vF�ei ter i? In Favor �_Against i i�hs��t Adopted by Council: Date � q� Certified Passed by Council Secretary or �� ; Works Sidewalks :T PEFiSON & PHONE Tvedt - 266-6087 E ON G04NCILAGENDA f �� 9- .� ' � ��' S"Z� 0�+1�5 ATEO GREEN SHEET No. � wRwuoa're irvmama're �OEPAKTMENTOIRECTOR ❑CRYWUNQL WR �CRYATfORNEY ❑CITYCLFAK ' � BUOGET DIflEGfOR � FlN. & MGT. SERVICES DIR. �MAYOR(ORASSISTANTj � (�,p{��{� Research �LSOF5IGNATUftEPAGE$ � _ (CLIPALLLOCATIONSFOk51GNATUq� u ASSOGIATE 7MENfqLpCCp�(�fiqNl ON RE�UESTED � � � � � - Reconstruct Sidewatk in Wards 1, 2, 5 S 6(See attached list) �� 'S 5� �9� —�g �D4 °v�R T� r� M�ar,�t� )MMENDA770N5: Apptova (A) w Fejert (Fi) pERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS: PIANNfNGCOMMISSION _GMLSERVICECOMMISSION }, HasihispersoNfi�meverworkedunderacront2Mforihisdepartment? ................._.- YES NO COUNCIL _ CH COUNCIL O&IECTIVE4 S I.L.Sd-I WHAT, WHEN. WHERE, WHYJ: 2. Has this persoNfirm ever been a ciry empioyee? YES NO 3. Does Ihis psrsoNfirtn possess a slull not nortnally possessed by any curtent ciry employee? YES NO Explain aii yes answers on separete sheet and attach to green sheet The problem "defective sidewalk" was caused by multiple problems, tree roots, poor subgrade materials, freezeRhaw cycles, service tife limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and corrected annually. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations. IFAPPFOVE�: The community will benefit from this project because it wiil provide safe defect free sidewalks for iis citizens. The sidewalk contracts are done by private contractors generating private sector jobs as a result. Historica4ly, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback because of consiruction procedures and assessments. Property owners question the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized. Having to assess for walk reconstruction remains a controversiai issue. This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in tum, wili generate more personal injury suits, resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in repairs and replacement, as well as claim payouts. CGUt�Cff �BS��i�i': �84�� ; �Y, �-:r r.a? h'. AMOUNTQFTRANSACiIONY (b�bll,`jZ COS7IREVENUEBUDGETED(CIRCLEONE) YES No iGSOURCE 99-Ft-o669 A, PIA 99 = 30 �00� pCiNffYNUMBER C99-2T752-0784-00000 ALINFORMAiION:(E7(P141N) B� AST = 35 �O O c. cis 99 = 50,000 t CITY OF ST. PAUL COUNCIL FILE N0. �� ,d�S / y� FINAL ORDER 0 R l G! N AL By File o. �9094 Voting Wa 5 In the idatter of sidesvalk reaonstruction at the followiag locations: 599097 - Both sides Charles Avenue from North Syndicate Street to North Griggs Street_ Laid ovar from Julv 28, 1449 *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reoonstxuctian (replacement of old sidewalk) -$8.65 per £ront foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $10.38 per £ront foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. A11 other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.87 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $5.23 per square foot. under Preliminary order approved The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Pau1 does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to prooeed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers sha11 calculate a11 e�enses incurred therein and sha11 report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays �nanav �'Sakey Bostrom..- P,bs�r� :�oleman �arris �antry vF�ei ter i? In Favor �_Against i i�hs��t Adopted by Council: Date � q� Certified Passed by Council Secretary or �� ; Works Sidewalks :T PEFiSON & PHONE Tvedt - 266-6087 E ON G04NCILAGENDA f �� 9- .� ' � ��' S"Z� 0�+1�5 ATEO GREEN SHEET No. � wRwuoa're irvmama're �OEPAKTMENTOIRECTOR ❑CRYWUNQL WR �CRYATfORNEY ❑CITYCLFAK ' � BUOGET DIflEGfOR � FlN. & MGT. SERVICES DIR. �MAYOR(ORASSISTANTj � (�,p{��{� Research �LSOF5IGNATUftEPAGE$ � _ (CLIPALLLOCATIONSFOk51GNATUq� u ASSOGIATE 7MENfqLpCCp�(�fiqNl ON RE�UESTED � � � � � - Reconstruct Sidewatk in Wards 1, 2, 5 S 6(See attached list) �� 'S 5� �9� —�g �D4 °v�R T� r� M�ar,�t� )MMENDA770N5: Apptova (A) w Fejert (Fi) pERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS: PIANNfNGCOMMISSION _GMLSERVICECOMMISSION }, HasihispersoNfi�meverworkedunderacront2Mforihisdepartment? ................._.- YES NO COUNCIL _ CH COUNCIL O&IECTIVE4 S I.L.Sd-I WHAT, WHEN. WHERE, WHYJ: 2. Has this persoNfirm ever been a ciry empioyee? YES NO 3. Does Ihis psrsoNfirtn possess a slull not nortnally possessed by any curtent ciry employee? YES NO Explain aii yes answers on separete sheet and attach to green sheet The problem "defective sidewalk" was caused by multiple problems, tree roots, poor subgrade materials, freezeRhaw cycles, service tife limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and corrected annually. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations. IFAPPFOVE�: The community will benefit from this project because it wiil provide safe defect free sidewalks for iis citizens. The sidewalk contracts are done by private contractors generating private sector jobs as a result. Historica4ly, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback because of consiruction procedures and assessments. Property owners question the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized. Having to assess for walk reconstruction remains a controversiai issue. This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in tum, wili generate more personal injury suits, resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in repairs and replacement, as well as claim payouts. CGUt�Cff �BS��i�i': �84�� ; �Y, �-:r r.a? h'. AMOUNTQFTRANSACiIONY (b�bll,`jZ COS7IREVENUEBUDGETED(CIRCLEONE) YES No iGSOURCE 99-Ft-o669 A, PIA 99 = 30 �00� pCiNffYNUMBER C99-2T752-0784-00000 ALINFORMAiION:(E7(P141N) B� AST = 35 �O O c. cis 99 = 50,000