The URL can be used to link to this page

99-603CITY OF ST. PAUL /� 17i1��'/Of1 ��Z� ��9 FINAL ORDER File G G_ In the Matter of sidewalk reconsh-uction at the following locations: WARD 3 S99Q79- South side Cnand Ave. from Cambridge St. to Macalester St. 599080- North side Crrand Ave. from S. Wheeler St. to Cambridge St. S99081- Both sides Juno Ave. from S. Syndicate St. to S. Crriggs St. S99082- East side S. Mississippi River Blvd. from Hartford Ave. to Randolph Ave. except for those panels in front of 59� and 6�0 Mississippi Rivex Boulevard. WARD 1 599083- Both sides Arundel St. from Sherburne Ave. to Edmund Ave. S99084- Both sides Virginia St. from Sherbume Ave. to Thomas Ave. 599085- West side N. Western Ave. from Edmund Ave. to Thomas Ave. `=,�- �d3 SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATIONS Wazd 3 PROTECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK S.S. GRAND AVE. from Cambridge St. to Macalester St. t/ �O� IIVITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as puhlic necessity on the basis of a petition with one (1) signer and an inspection of the walk. This walk is poured concrete with asphalt patches, settled, uneven and cracked panels. ......................................................................................................... �i/ � / PROTECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK N.S. GRAND AVE. from S. Wheeler St. to Cambridge St. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of public works as public necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, scaled, settled and cracked panels. ......................................................................................................... ��+ / / PRO TECT: RECON5TRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. JUNO AVE. from S. Syndicate St. to S. Griggs St. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of a petition with one (1) signer and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with heaves, water pockets, settled and cracked panels. ......................................................................................................... //�/ L PROTECT: RECONSTRUCT & CONSTRUCT SIDEWALK E.S. S. MISSISSIPPI RIVER BLVD. from Hartford Ave. to Randolph Ave. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of a petition with one (1) signer and an inspection of the walk. � -a- EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, settled anc cracked panels. ........................................................................................................ �� 1 Si7MMARY OF ENGINEERING RECONTNIENDATIONS Wazd 1 PROTECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. ARUNDEL ST. from Sherburne Ave. to Edmund Ave. 5 ([ V Y3 INtTIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of eight (8) complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, water pockets, asphalt patches, scaled, settled and cracked panels. ........................................................................................ PROTECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. VIIZGINIA ST. from Sherburne Ave. to Thomas Ave. �� INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, settled and cracked panels. ......................................................................................................... ��. PROTECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK W.S. N. WESTERN AVE. from Edmund Ave. to Thomas Ave. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with settled and cracked panels. .................................................................................................. CITY OF ST. PAUL PRELINIINARY ORDER � ORiGINAL In the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction at the following locations: WARD 3 S99079- South side Cnand Ave. from Cambridge St. to Macalester St. S99080- North side Cnand Ave. from S. Wheeler St. to Cambridge St. 599081- Both sides 3uno Ave. from S. Syndicate St. to S. Griggs St. 599082- East side S. Mississippi River Blvd. from Hartford Ave. to Randolph Ave. WARD 1 599083- Both sides Arundel St. from Sherburne Ave. to Edmund Ave. 599084- Both sides Virginia St. from 5herburne Ave. to Thomas Ave. . - .i , 1%� � II ,�� , / i�/ COUNCIL aa 599085- West side N. Western Ave. from Edmund Ave. to Thomas Ave. �� 5 9 4-loa3 *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three faznily structutes) Reconstrucrion (replacement of old sidewalk) -$8.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $1038 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100°!0 of the actual cost estunated to be approximately $3.87 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100% of actual cost estimated to be approximately $5.23 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 2. 3. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no altematives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SBE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1998 Public Improvement Aid. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 23rd dav of 3une, 1999 at 530 P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hali and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COLTNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays ✓Benanav ✓Blakey BOS1LOri1— Coleman Hazris — ✓Lantry ✓I�eiter �`]scy�T — Abs � r.� Rbs�� -{ In Favor Adopted by Council: Date�`� �l �( Certified Passed by Council Secretary B S'��.��-�^ = r--� �Against _ 3 /abs�ri} Mayor ,� �� Wc �RI� � ; DEPARTMENT/OFFICElCOUNdL Public Works Sidewalks CONTACTPEflSON&PHONE Jerry Tvedt - 266-6087 MUST BE ON COUNGILAGENDA BV (DAit� s� ��auc ��,U�� OTAL t OF SIGNATURE PAG6 � � f �� =�-99 (� D EINffIATEO �� `5 �� 4 GREEN SHEET No. D�96D—' - INRIAVDA7E INfiIAL/DAiE I�DEPARTMENTDIRECTOR ❑CR1'CAUNCIL UMBEF2FOR I�CRYARORNEY ❑GIfYCLERK � ORDER G I ��'� DIRECTOR ❑ FIN. 8 MGT. SERVICES DIR 77 �� MAYOR(ORASSISTANi) i❑ Council Research (GLIPALLIOCATONSFORSIGNATUR� I I �SOC�ATE �.... ✓� " 7 . /`T _ 7 Reconstruct 8� Construct Sidewalk in Wards 1& 3(See attached list) Hl,� �'�5 .5q9D79-5q�(�5 aECOMMENDAilONS: Approve (A) or Reject (R) PERSONAL SEFiVICE CONTFiACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWINCa �UESTIONS: _PLANNINGCOMMISSION JCIVILSERVICECOMMISSION 1, HasthispersoNfirtneverworkeduntleraconirac[forthisdepartmenC? CIBCOMMITfEE YES NO — 2. Has this persoNfirtn ever been a ciry employee? ? srnFF _ YES NO DISTRICTCOUNCIL 3. Does this personffirtn possess a sitill not nortnally possessed by any curtent city employee? — — VES NO iUPPOFTS WHICHCOUNCILOBIECTIVE? Explain all yes answers on separate sheet and aitach to green sheet ur�R�► i d- 3 4VHAT, WHEN, WHERE, WH1�: The probiem "defective sidewaik" was caused by multiple problems, tree roots, poor subgrade materials, freeze/thaw cycles, service life limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and corrected annually. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be unusable and subject to incseased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations. APPROVED: The community will benefit from this prqect because it will provide safe defect free sidewalks�for its citizens. The sidewalk contracts are done by private contractors generating private sector jobs as a result. Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback because of construdion procedures and assessments. Properry owners question the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized. Having to assess for waik reconstruction remains a controversial issue. �ADVANTAGESIFNOTAPPROVED: This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in tum, wiil generate more personai injury suits, resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in repairs and replacement, as well as claim payouts. i6w�?a�:i`?'s �S �U�1�3 ��`� g 3 ��9� fOTAL AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION $ FUNDINGSOUHCE 99 ^�^06i (IXPLAIN) A,. PtA 94 = 63Q;006 a, nsT = 35�,000 c,'cra 99 = 50;000 BUDGETED (CIRCLE ON� ' YES No CITY OF ST. PAUL /� 17i1��'/Of1 ��Z� ��9 FINAL ORDER File G G_ In the Matter of sidewalk reconsh-uction at the following locations: WARD 3 S99Q79- South side Cnand Ave. from Cambridge St. to Macalester St. 599080- North side Crrand Ave. from S. Wheeler St. to Cambridge St. S99081- Both sides Juno Ave. from S. Syndicate St. to S. Crriggs St. S99082- East side S. Mississippi River Blvd. from Hartford Ave. to Randolph Ave. except for those panels in front of 59� and 6�0 Mississippi Rivex Boulevard. WARD 1 599083- Both sides Arundel St. from Sherburne Ave. to Edmund Ave. S99084- Both sides Virginia St. from Sherbume Ave. to Thomas Ave. 599085- West side N. Western Ave. from Edmund Ave. to Thomas Ave. `=,�- �d3 SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATIONS Wazd 3 PROTECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK S.S. GRAND AVE. from Cambridge St. to Macalester St. t/ �O� IIVITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as puhlic necessity on the basis of a petition with one (1) signer and an inspection of the walk. This walk is poured concrete with asphalt patches, settled, uneven and cracked panels. ......................................................................................................... �i/ � / PROTECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK N.S. GRAND AVE. from S. Wheeler St. to Cambridge St. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of public works as public necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, scaled, settled and cracked panels. ......................................................................................................... ��+ / / PRO TECT: RECON5TRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. JUNO AVE. from S. Syndicate St. to S. Griggs St. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of a petition with one (1) signer and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with heaves, water pockets, settled and cracked panels. ......................................................................................................... //�/ L PROTECT: RECONSTRUCT & CONSTRUCT SIDEWALK E.S. S. MISSISSIPPI RIVER BLVD. from Hartford Ave. to Randolph Ave. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of a petition with one (1) signer and an inspection of the walk. � -a- EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, settled anc cracked panels. ........................................................................................................ �� 1 Si7MMARY OF ENGINEERING RECONTNIENDATIONS Wazd 1 PROTECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. ARUNDEL ST. from Sherburne Ave. to Edmund Ave. 5 ([ V Y3 INtTIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of eight (8) complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, water pockets, asphalt patches, scaled, settled and cracked panels. ........................................................................................ PROTECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. VIIZGINIA ST. from Sherburne Ave. to Thomas Ave. �� INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, settled and cracked panels. ......................................................................................................... ��. PROTECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK W.S. N. WESTERN AVE. from Edmund Ave. to Thomas Ave. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with settled and cracked panels. .................................................................................................. CITY OF ST. PAUL PRELINIINARY ORDER � ORiGINAL In the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction at the following locations: WARD 3 S99079- South side Cnand Ave. from Cambridge St. to Macalester St. S99080- North side Cnand Ave. from S. Wheeler St. to Cambridge St. 599081- Both sides 3uno Ave. from S. Syndicate St. to S. Griggs St. 599082- East side S. Mississippi River Blvd. from Hartford Ave. to Randolph Ave. WARD 1 599083- Both sides Arundel St. from Sherburne Ave. to Edmund Ave. 599084- Both sides Virginia St. from 5herburne Ave. to Thomas Ave. . - .i , 1%� � II ,�� , / i�/ COUNCIL aa 599085- West side N. Western Ave. from Edmund Ave. to Thomas Ave. �� 5 9 4-loa3 *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three faznily structutes) Reconstrucrion (replacement of old sidewalk) -$8.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $1038 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100°!0 of the actual cost estunated to be approximately $3.87 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100% of actual cost estimated to be approximately $5.23 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 2. 3. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no altematives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SBE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1998 Public Improvement Aid. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 23rd dav of 3une, 1999 at 530 P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hali and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COLTNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays ✓Benanav ✓Blakey BOS1LOri1— Coleman Hazris — ✓Lantry ✓I�eiter �`]scy�T — Abs � r.� Rbs�� -{ In Favor Adopted by Council: Date�`� �l �( Certified Passed by Council Secretary B S'��.��-�^ = r--� �Against _ 3 /abs�ri} Mayor ,� �� Wc �RI� � ; DEPARTMENT/OFFICElCOUNdL Public Works Sidewalks CONTACTPEflSON&PHONE Jerry Tvedt - 266-6087 MUST BE ON COUNGILAGENDA BV (DAit� s� ��auc ��,U�� OTAL t OF SIGNATURE PAG6 � � f �� =�-99 (� D EINffIATEO �� `5 �� 4 GREEN SHEET No. D�96D—' - INRIAVDA7E INfiIAL/DAiE I�DEPARTMENTDIRECTOR ❑CR1'CAUNCIL UMBEF2FOR I�CRYARORNEY ❑GIfYCLERK � ORDER G I ��'� DIRECTOR ❑ FIN. 8 MGT. SERVICES DIR 77 �� MAYOR(ORASSISTANi) i❑ Council Research (GLIPALLIOCATONSFORSIGNATUR� I I �SOC�ATE �.... ✓� " 7 . /`T _ 7 Reconstruct 8� Construct Sidewalk in Wards 1& 3(See attached list) Hl,� �'�5 .5q9D79-5q�(�5 aECOMMENDAilONS: Approve (A) or Reject (R) PERSONAL SEFiVICE CONTFiACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWINCa �UESTIONS: _PLANNINGCOMMISSION JCIVILSERVICECOMMISSION 1, HasthispersoNfirtneverworkeduntleraconirac[forthisdepartmenC? CIBCOMMITfEE YES NO — 2. Has this persoNfirtn ever been a ciry employee? ? srnFF _ YES NO DISTRICTCOUNCIL 3. Does this personffirtn possess a sitill not nortnally possessed by any curtent city employee? — — VES NO iUPPOFTS WHICHCOUNCILOBIECTIVE? Explain all yes answers on separate sheet and aitach to green sheet ur�R�► i d- 3 4VHAT, WHEN, WHERE, WH1�: The probiem "defective sidewaik" was caused by multiple problems, tree roots, poor subgrade materials, freeze/thaw cycles, service life limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and corrected annually. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be unusable and subject to incseased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations. APPROVED: The community will benefit from this prqect because it will provide safe defect free sidewalks�for its citizens. The sidewalk contracts are done by private contractors generating private sector jobs as a result. Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback because of construdion procedures and assessments. Properry owners question the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized. Having to assess for waik reconstruction remains a controversial issue. �ADVANTAGESIFNOTAPPROVED: This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in tum, wiil generate more personai injury suits, resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in repairs and replacement, as well as claim payouts. i6w�?a�:i`?'s �S �U�1�3 ��`� g 3 ��9� fOTAL AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION $ FUNDINGSOUHCE 99 ^�^06i (IXPLAIN) A,. PtA 94 = 63Q;006 a, nsT = 35�,000 c,'cra 99 = 50;000 BUDGETED (CIRCLE ON� ' YES No CITY OF ST. PAUL /� 17i1��'/Of1 ��Z� ��9 FINAL ORDER File G G_ In the Matter of sidewalk reconsh-uction at the following locations: WARD 3 S99Q79- South side Cnand Ave. from Cambridge St. to Macalester St. 599080- North side Crrand Ave. from S. Wheeler St. to Cambridge St. S99081- Both sides Juno Ave. from S. Syndicate St. to S. Crriggs St. S99082- East side S. Mississippi River Blvd. from Hartford Ave. to Randolph Ave. except for those panels in front of 59� and 6�0 Mississippi Rivex Boulevard. WARD 1 599083- Both sides Arundel St. from Sherburne Ave. to Edmund Ave. S99084- Both sides Virginia St. from Sherbume Ave. to Thomas Ave. 599085- West side N. Western Ave. from Edmund Ave. to Thomas Ave. `=,�- �d3 SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATIONS Wazd 3 PROTECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK S.S. GRAND AVE. from Cambridge St. to Macalester St. t/ �O� IIVITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as puhlic necessity on the basis of a petition with one (1) signer and an inspection of the walk. This walk is poured concrete with asphalt patches, settled, uneven and cracked panels. ......................................................................................................... �i/ � / PROTECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK N.S. GRAND AVE. from S. Wheeler St. to Cambridge St. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of public works as public necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, scaled, settled and cracked panels. ......................................................................................................... ��+ / / PRO TECT: RECON5TRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. JUNO AVE. from S. Syndicate St. to S. Griggs St. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of a petition with one (1) signer and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with heaves, water pockets, settled and cracked panels. ......................................................................................................... //�/ L PROTECT: RECONSTRUCT & CONSTRUCT SIDEWALK E.S. S. MISSISSIPPI RIVER BLVD. from Hartford Ave. to Randolph Ave. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of a petition with one (1) signer and an inspection of the walk. � -a- EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, settled anc cracked panels. ........................................................................................................ �� 1 Si7MMARY OF ENGINEERING RECONTNIENDATIONS Wazd 1 PROTECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. ARUNDEL ST. from Sherburne Ave. to Edmund Ave. 5 ([ V Y3 INtTIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of eight (8) complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, water pockets, asphalt patches, scaled, settled and cracked panels. ........................................................................................ PROTECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. VIIZGINIA ST. from Sherburne Ave. to Thomas Ave. �� INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, settled and cracked panels. ......................................................................................................... ��. PROTECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK W.S. N. WESTERN AVE. from Edmund Ave. to Thomas Ave. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with settled and cracked panels. .................................................................................................. CITY OF ST. PAUL PRELINIINARY ORDER � ORiGINAL In the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction at the following locations: WARD 3 S99079- South side Cnand Ave. from Cambridge St. to Macalester St. S99080- North side Cnand Ave. from S. Wheeler St. to Cambridge St. 599081- Both sides 3uno Ave. from S. Syndicate St. to S. Griggs St. 599082- East side S. Mississippi River Blvd. from Hartford Ave. to Randolph Ave. WARD 1 599083- Both sides Arundel St. from Sherburne Ave. to Edmund Ave. 599084- Both sides Virginia St. from 5herburne Ave. to Thomas Ave. . - .i , 1%� � II ,�� , / i�/ COUNCIL aa 599085- West side N. Western Ave. from Edmund Ave. to Thomas Ave. �� 5 9 4-loa3 *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three faznily structutes) Reconstrucrion (replacement of old sidewalk) -$8.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $1038 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100°!0 of the actual cost estunated to be approximately $3.87 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100% of actual cost estimated to be approximately $5.23 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 2. 3. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no altematives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SBE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1998 Public Improvement Aid. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 23rd dav of 3une, 1999 at 530 P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hali and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COLTNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays ✓Benanav ✓Blakey BOS1LOri1— Coleman Hazris — ✓Lantry ✓I�eiter �`]scy�T — Abs � r.� Rbs�� -{ In Favor Adopted by Council: Date�`� �l �( Certified Passed by Council Secretary B S'��.��-�^ = r--� �Against _ 3 /abs�ri} Mayor ,� �� Wc �RI� � ; DEPARTMENT/OFFICElCOUNdL Public Works Sidewalks CONTACTPEflSON&PHONE Jerry Tvedt - 266-6087 MUST BE ON COUNGILAGENDA BV (DAit� s� ��auc ��,U�� OTAL t OF SIGNATURE PAG6 � � f �� =�-99 (� D EINffIATEO �� `5 �� 4 GREEN SHEET No. D�96D—' - INRIAVDA7E INfiIAL/DAiE I�DEPARTMENTDIRECTOR ❑CR1'CAUNCIL UMBEF2FOR I�CRYARORNEY ❑GIfYCLERK � ORDER G I ��'� DIRECTOR ❑ FIN. 8 MGT. SERVICES DIR 77 �� MAYOR(ORASSISTANi) i❑ Council Research (GLIPALLIOCATONSFORSIGNATUR� I I �SOC�ATE �.... ✓� " 7 . /`T _ 7 Reconstruct 8� Construct Sidewalk in Wards 1& 3(See attached list) Hl,� �'�5 .5q9D79-5q�(�5 aECOMMENDAilONS: Approve (A) or Reject (R) PERSONAL SEFiVICE CONTFiACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWINCa �UESTIONS: _PLANNINGCOMMISSION JCIVILSERVICECOMMISSION 1, HasthispersoNfirtneverworkeduntleraconirac[forthisdepartmenC? CIBCOMMITfEE YES NO — 2. Has this persoNfirtn ever been a ciry employee? ? srnFF _ YES NO DISTRICTCOUNCIL 3. Does this personffirtn possess a sitill not nortnally possessed by any curtent city employee? — — VES NO iUPPOFTS WHICHCOUNCILOBIECTIVE? Explain all yes answers on separate sheet and aitach to green sheet ur�R�► i d- 3 4VHAT, WHEN, WHERE, WH1�: The probiem "defective sidewaik" was caused by multiple problems, tree roots, poor subgrade materials, freeze/thaw cycles, service life limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and corrected annually. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be unusable and subject to incseased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations. APPROVED: The community will benefit from this prqect because it will provide safe defect free sidewalks�for its citizens. The sidewalk contracts are done by private contractors generating private sector jobs as a result. Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback because of construdion procedures and assessments. Properry owners question the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized. Having to assess for waik reconstruction remains a controversial issue. �ADVANTAGESIFNOTAPPROVED: This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in tum, wiil generate more personai injury suits, resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in repairs and replacement, as well as claim payouts. i6w�?a�:i`?'s �S �U�1�3 ��`� g 3 ��9� fOTAL AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION $ FUNDINGSOUHCE 99 ^�^06i (IXPLAIN) A,. PtA 94 = 63Q;006 a, nsT = 35�,000 c,'cra 99 = 50;000 BUDGETED (CIRCLE ON� ' YES No