The URL can be used to link to this page

99-602CITY OF ST. PAUL rynr_�rr� : � �� ORIGINAL COUNCIL FILE NO. ��— leO By File No. SEE BE Q Voting Wazd_4,7 In the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction at the following locations: WARD 4 S99074 - \�i'/_\ N III�. " 1 599076- 599077- West side N. Prior Ave. from Pennock Ave. to Hewitt Ave. at 755 N. Prior Ave. only. Both sides E. Fifth St. from Germain St. to N. White Beaz Ave. and East side Flandrau St. from E. FourKh St. to E. Fifth St. Both sides Flandrau St. from E. Fifth St. to Margaret St. Both sides Kennard St. from E. Fourth St. to E. Fifth St. �� 599078- Both sides E. Sixth St. from Flandrau St. to N. White Beaz Ave. �5 t�o� SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING REC011�VIENDATION Wazd 4 PROTECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK W.S. N. PRIOR AVE. from Pennock Ave. to Hewitt Ave. at 755 N. Prior Ave. Qnly. ✓ t!� IrTITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of a petition with one (1)signer and an inspectaon of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with heaves, asphalt patches, disintegrated, scaled, settled and cracked panels. ......................................................................................................... �t� l�vz SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECONII��NDATIONS Ward 7 PROTECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. E. FIFTH ST. from Germain St. to N. White Beaz Ave. & E.S. FLANDRAU ST. from E. Fourth St. to E. Fifth St. �� IIVITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of eleven (11) complaints and an inspection of the walk_ EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, water pockets, asphalt patches, disintegrated, scaled, settled and cracked panels. ......................................................................................................... PROTECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. FLANDRAU ST. from E. Fifth St. to Margaret St. �� TNITIATII�G ACTION: This order was initiated by the Airector of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint and an inspection of the walk. This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, settled and cracked panels. ......................................................................................................... PROTECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. KENNARD ST. from E. Fourth St. to E. Fifth St. ��0� INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of one (1) comglaint and an inspection of the wallc. This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, /// � scaled, settled and cracked panels. PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. E. SIXTH ST. from Flandrau St. to N. White Beaz Ave. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint and an inspection of the walk. ��-l� a -z- EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, water pockets, asphalt patches, settled and cracked panels. CITY OF ST. PAUL PRELIMINARY ORDER ORIGINAL COUNCIL FILE NO. a Iq —� � By File No. EE BE O� Voting Wazd,4,7 In the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction at the following locations: WA.RD 4 599074 - WA.RD 7 S99075 - 599076- 599077- West side N. Prior Ave. from Pennock Ave. to Hewitt Ave. at 755 N. Prior Ave. only. Both sides E. Fifth St. from Germain St. to N. White Beaz Ave. and East side Flandrau St. from E. Fourth St. to E. Fifth St. Both sides Flandrau St. from E. Fifth St. to Margaret St. Both sides Kennard St. from E. Fourth St. to E. Fifth St. �� a� 599078- Both sides E. Siath St. from Flandrau St. to N. VJhite Beaz Ave. � � �oZ *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstrucfion (replacement of old sidewallc) -$8.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $1038 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide wa1k. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100% of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.87 per square foot. All comer residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. M[7LTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NOI3 RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100% of actual cost estimated to be approximately $5.23 per square foot. under Preliminary order �� — �-{ \ � approved � � The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public heazing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, obj ections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays ✓ Benanav '� Blakey '� Bostrom '� Coleman '� H3CC1S � Lantry � Reiter Adopted by Council: Date � 2� ry y y Certified Pass,ed by fdouncil Secretary ZIn Favor By �Against <_s�� '%u�/ 7/j/�g / Mayor 95 02- � *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RAT'ES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$8.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $1038 per front foot for a sis (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100% of the actual cost estimated to be approa�imately $3.87 per squaze foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MiJLTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100% of actual cost estimated to be approximately $5.23 per squaze foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resoives: That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for esfimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1998 Public Improvement Aid. 2. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 23rd dav of June 1999 at 530 P M in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. 3. That no6ce of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of heazing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COtJNCILPERSONS Adopted by Council: Date_�'�t� `(� Yeas Nays �enanav Certified Passed by Council Secretary VBlakey Bostrom — �b��,-.t Coleman - 'A�, s �� Harris — iAbs�t- `} In Favor v�anhy �Reiter BY ��_� ��_ ��-- SiAgainst 3 R1� s �,-c} Mayor � � WL 1�f�(�fG � � �llN� 23 �999 �E 5-3- 9 � z DEPAflTMEPlr/OFFICE/COUNCIL DA INRIATED PublicWorksSidewalks i�-ss GREEN SHEET No. � iNmawa iNmumnre ONTACTPERSON&PHONE �DEPARTMENTOIRECtOR CfTYCOUNCIL erryTvedl-266-6087 A�r'N �CRYATfORNEY ❑CfTYGLERK MU5TBEONCOUNdLAGENDABY(DAT� -� ROUiI G� � V Qpp � BUDGE( DIRECTOR ❑ FlN. & MGT. SERVICES DIR � 1 �8 C � Z7J �MAYOR(ORASSISTANi) 1❑ (�AUlICII RQ52H[Ch 1 U TALiOPSiGNATUflEPAGES _(CLIPALLLOCATIONSPoHSIGNAiUR� u ASSOCIATE DEP ENTALACCOUNrANT CTiON qEDUE5IED � j Reconstruct Sidewalk in Wards 4& 7(See attached lisi) F► 5 - aECOM�eENDanotas: n�ro�e (A) «ae�ea (a) PERSONAL SERVICE CONiRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS: PLANNINGCOMMISSION _CMLSERNCECOMMISSION 7, HasthispersoNfirtneverworketlunderaconVactforthistlepartment? CIBCqMrn�rrEE YES NO — — 2. Has this persoN6rtn everbeen a ciry employee? A sinFF _ YES NO Di5raICTCOUNCi� 3. Does Mis person/firm possess a skill not nortnaly possessed by any curtent city employee? — YES NO SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL O&IECTIVE? Explain all yes answers on separate sheet antl aifaeh to green sheM �� INfiIATING PROBLEM, 1 UE, O PoFIUNITY (WHO. WHAT. WHEN, WHERE, WH`n: The probiem "defective sidewalk" was caused by mukip{e problems, tree roots, poor subgrade materiaVs, freeze/thaw cycies, service life limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and corrected annually. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations. ADVAMAGES IF APPFOVED: � The community will benefit from this project because it will provide safe defect free sidewalks for its citizens. The sidewalk contsacts are done by private contractors generating private sector jobs as a result. DISADVAIJrAGES IF APPROVED: Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback because of construction procedures and assessments. Properry owners question the assessments, despite the fact [hat up to one-half the assessmen[ is C'ity subsidized. Having to assess for waik reconstruction remains a controversial issue. D15ADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED: This option would aliow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal injury suits, resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in repairs and replacement, as well as claim payouts. s�4�C'r�.;� i`:� ��w` i vc: t1'�i �� `� e�. ��J TOTAL AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION $ E4 ��l � j�Z C0.STlREVENUE 6UDGETED (CIRCLE ONE) YES No FUNDINGSOURCE 9q'^��6 � PtA 99 = 6 9 3o ,0�Q ACINITYNUMBER C99-2T752-078400000 PINANCIALINFORMATION:(EXPLAIN) B„ A�T - JS� �,DOO � � � c, ctB 99 = So;ooa CITY OF ST. PAUL rynr_�rr� : � �� ORIGINAL COUNCIL FILE NO. ��— leO By File No. SEE BE Q Voting Wazd_4,7 In the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction at the following locations: WARD 4 S99074 - \�i'/_\ N III�. " 1 599076- 599077- West side N. Prior Ave. from Pennock Ave. to Hewitt Ave. at 755 N. Prior Ave. only. Both sides E. Fifth St. from Germain St. to N. White Beaz Ave. and East side Flandrau St. from E. FourKh St. to E. Fifth St. Both sides Flandrau St. from E. Fifth St. to Margaret St. Both sides Kennard St. from E. Fourth St. to E. Fifth St. �� 599078- Both sides E. Sixth St. from Flandrau St. to N. White Beaz Ave. �5 t�o� SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING REC011�VIENDATION Wazd 4 PROTECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK W.S. N. PRIOR AVE. from Pennock Ave. to Hewitt Ave. at 755 N. Prior Ave. Qnly. ✓ t!� IrTITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of a petition with one (1)signer and an inspectaon of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with heaves, asphalt patches, disintegrated, scaled, settled and cracked panels. ......................................................................................................... �t� l�vz SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECONII��NDATIONS Ward 7 PROTECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. E. FIFTH ST. from Germain St. to N. White Beaz Ave. & E.S. FLANDRAU ST. from E. Fourth St. to E. Fifth St. �� IIVITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of eleven (11) complaints and an inspection of the walk_ EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, water pockets, asphalt patches, disintegrated, scaled, settled and cracked panels. ......................................................................................................... PROTECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. FLANDRAU ST. from E. Fifth St. to Margaret St. �� TNITIATII�G ACTION: This order was initiated by the Airector of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint and an inspection of the walk. This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, settled and cracked panels. ......................................................................................................... PROTECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. KENNARD ST. from E. Fourth St. to E. Fifth St. ��0� INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of one (1) comglaint and an inspection of the wallc. This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, /// � scaled, settled and cracked panels. PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. E. SIXTH ST. from Flandrau St. to N. White Beaz Ave. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint and an inspection of the walk. ��-l� a -z- EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, water pockets, asphalt patches, settled and cracked panels. CITY OF ST. PAUL PRELIMINARY ORDER ORIGINAL COUNCIL FILE NO. a Iq —� � By File No. EE BE O� Voting Wazd,4,7 In the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction at the following locations: WA.RD 4 599074 - WA.RD 7 S99075 - 599076- 599077- West side N. Prior Ave. from Pennock Ave. to Hewitt Ave. at 755 N. Prior Ave. only. Both sides E. Fifth St. from Germain St. to N. White Beaz Ave. and East side Flandrau St. from E. Fourth St. to E. Fifth St. Both sides Flandrau St. from E. Fifth St. to Margaret St. Both sides Kennard St. from E. Fourth St. to E. Fifth St. �� a� 599078- Both sides E. Siath St. from Flandrau St. to N. VJhite Beaz Ave. � � �oZ *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstrucfion (replacement of old sidewallc) -$8.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $1038 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide wa1k. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100% of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.87 per square foot. All comer residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. M[7LTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NOI3 RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100% of actual cost estimated to be approximately $5.23 per square foot. under Preliminary order �� — �-{ \ � approved � � The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public heazing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, obj ections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays ✓ Benanav '� Blakey '� Bostrom '� Coleman '� H3CC1S � Lantry � Reiter Adopted by Council: Date � 2� ry y y Certified Pass,ed by fdouncil Secretary ZIn Favor By �Against <_s�� '%u�/ 7/j/�g / Mayor 95 02- � *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RAT'ES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$8.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $1038 per front foot for a sis (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100% of the actual cost estimated to be approa�imately $3.87 per squaze foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MiJLTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100% of actual cost estimated to be approximately $5.23 per squaze foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resoives: That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for esfimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1998 Public Improvement Aid. 2. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 23rd dav of June 1999 at 530 P M in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. 3. That no6ce of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of heazing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COtJNCILPERSONS Adopted by Council: Date_�'�t� `(� Yeas Nays �enanav Certified Passed by Council Secretary VBlakey Bostrom — �b��,-.t Coleman - 'A�, s �� Harris — iAbs�t- `} In Favor v�anhy �Reiter BY ��_� ��_ ��-- SiAgainst 3 R1� s �,-c} Mayor � � WL 1�f�(�fG � � �llN� 23 �999 �E 5-3- 9 � z DEPAflTMEPlr/OFFICE/COUNCIL DA INRIATED PublicWorksSidewalks i�-ss GREEN SHEET No. � iNmawa iNmumnre ONTACTPERSON&PHONE �DEPARTMENTOIRECtOR CfTYCOUNCIL erryTvedl-266-6087 A�r'N �CRYATfORNEY ❑CfTYGLERK MU5TBEONCOUNdLAGENDABY(DAT� -� ROUiI G� � V Qpp � BUDGE( DIRECTOR ❑ FlN. & MGT. SERVICES DIR � 1 �8 C � Z7J �MAYOR(ORASSISTANi) 1❑ (�AUlICII RQ52H[Ch 1 U TALiOPSiGNATUflEPAGES _(CLIPALLLOCATIONSPoHSIGNAiUR� u ASSOCIATE DEP ENTALACCOUNrANT CTiON qEDUE5IED � j Reconstruct Sidewalk in Wards 4& 7(See attached lisi) F► 5 - aECOM�eENDanotas: n�ro�e (A) «ae�ea (a) PERSONAL SERVICE CONiRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS: PLANNINGCOMMISSION _CMLSERNCECOMMISSION 7, HasthispersoNfirtneverworketlunderaconVactforthistlepartment? CIBCqMrn�rrEE YES NO — — 2. Has this persoN6rtn everbeen a ciry employee? A sinFF _ YES NO Di5raICTCOUNCi� 3. Does Mis person/firm possess a skill not nortnaly possessed by any curtent city employee? — YES NO SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL O&IECTIVE? Explain all yes answers on separate sheet antl aifaeh to green sheM �� INfiIATING PROBLEM, 1 UE, O PoFIUNITY (WHO. WHAT. WHEN, WHERE, WH`n: The probiem "defective sidewalk" was caused by mukip{e problems, tree roots, poor subgrade materiaVs, freeze/thaw cycies, service life limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and corrected annually. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations. ADVAMAGES IF APPFOVED: � The community will benefit from this project because it will provide safe defect free sidewalks for its citizens. The sidewalk contsacts are done by private contractors generating private sector jobs as a result. DISADVAIJrAGES IF APPROVED: Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback because of construction procedures and assessments. Properry owners question the assessments, despite the fact [hat up to one-half the assessmen[ is C'ity subsidized. Having to assess for waik reconstruction remains a controversial issue. D15ADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED: This option would aliow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal injury suits, resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in repairs and replacement, as well as claim payouts. s�4�C'r�.;� i`:� ��w` i vc: t1'�i �� `� e�. ��J TOTAL AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION $ E4 ��l � j�Z C0.STlREVENUE 6UDGETED (CIRCLE ONE) YES No FUNDINGSOURCE 9q'^��6 � PtA 99 = 6 9 3o ,0�Q ACINITYNUMBER C99-2T752-078400000 PINANCIALINFORMATION:(EXPLAIN) B„ A�T - JS� �,DOO � � � c, ctB 99 = So;ooa CITY OF ST. PAUL rynr_�rr� : � �� ORIGINAL COUNCIL FILE NO. ��— leO By File No. SEE BE Q Voting Wazd_4,7 In the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction at the following locations: WARD 4 S99074 - \�i'/_\ N III�. " 1 599076- 599077- West side N. Prior Ave. from Pennock Ave. to Hewitt Ave. at 755 N. Prior Ave. only. Both sides E. Fifth St. from Germain St. to N. White Beaz Ave. and East side Flandrau St. from E. FourKh St. to E. Fifth St. Both sides Flandrau St. from E. Fifth St. to Margaret St. Both sides Kennard St. from E. Fourth St. to E. Fifth St. �� 599078- Both sides E. Sixth St. from Flandrau St. to N. White Beaz Ave. �5 t�o� SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING REC011�VIENDATION Wazd 4 PROTECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK W.S. N. PRIOR AVE. from Pennock Ave. to Hewitt Ave. at 755 N. Prior Ave. Qnly. ✓ t!� IrTITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of a petition with one (1)signer and an inspectaon of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with heaves, asphalt patches, disintegrated, scaled, settled and cracked panels. ......................................................................................................... �t� l�vz SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECONII��NDATIONS Ward 7 PROTECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. E. FIFTH ST. from Germain St. to N. White Beaz Ave. & E.S. FLANDRAU ST. from E. Fourth St. to E. Fifth St. �� IIVITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of eleven (11) complaints and an inspection of the walk_ EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, water pockets, asphalt patches, disintegrated, scaled, settled and cracked panels. ......................................................................................................... PROTECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. FLANDRAU ST. from E. Fifth St. to Margaret St. �� TNITIATII�G ACTION: This order was initiated by the Airector of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint and an inspection of the walk. This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, settled and cracked panels. ......................................................................................................... PROTECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. KENNARD ST. from E. Fourth St. to E. Fifth St. ��0� INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of one (1) comglaint and an inspection of the wallc. This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, /// � scaled, settled and cracked panels. PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. E. SIXTH ST. from Flandrau St. to N. White Beaz Ave. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint and an inspection of the walk. ��-l� a -z- EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, water pockets, asphalt patches, settled and cracked panels. CITY OF ST. PAUL PRELIMINARY ORDER ORIGINAL COUNCIL FILE NO. a Iq —� � By File No. EE BE O� Voting Wazd,4,7 In the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction at the following locations: WA.RD 4 599074 - WA.RD 7 S99075 - 599076- 599077- West side N. Prior Ave. from Pennock Ave. to Hewitt Ave. at 755 N. Prior Ave. only. Both sides E. Fifth St. from Germain St. to N. White Beaz Ave. and East side Flandrau St. from E. Fourth St. to E. Fifth St. Both sides Flandrau St. from E. Fifth St. to Margaret St. Both sides Kennard St. from E. Fourth St. to E. Fifth St. �� a� 599078- Both sides E. Siath St. from Flandrau St. to N. VJhite Beaz Ave. � � �oZ *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstrucfion (replacement of old sidewallc) -$8.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $1038 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide wa1k. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100% of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.87 per square foot. All comer residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. M[7LTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NOI3 RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100% of actual cost estimated to be approximately $5.23 per square foot. under Preliminary order �� — �-{ \ � approved � � The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public heazing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, obj ections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays ✓ Benanav '� Blakey '� Bostrom '� Coleman '� H3CC1S � Lantry � Reiter Adopted by Council: Date � 2� ry y y Certified Pass,ed by fdouncil Secretary ZIn Favor By �Against <_s�� '%u�/ 7/j/�g / Mayor 95 02- � *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RAT'ES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$8.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $1038 per front foot for a sis (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100% of the actual cost estimated to be approa�imately $3.87 per squaze foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MiJLTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100% of actual cost estimated to be approximately $5.23 per squaze foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resoives: That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for esfimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1998 Public Improvement Aid. 2. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 23rd dav of June 1999 at 530 P M in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. 3. That no6ce of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of heazing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COtJNCILPERSONS Adopted by Council: Date_�'�t� `(� Yeas Nays �enanav Certified Passed by Council Secretary VBlakey Bostrom — �b��,-.t Coleman - 'A�, s �� Harris — iAbs�t- `} In Favor v�anhy �Reiter BY ��_� ��_ ��-- SiAgainst 3 R1� s �,-c} Mayor � � WL 1�f�(�fG � � �llN� 23 �999 �E 5-3- 9 � z DEPAflTMEPlr/OFFICE/COUNCIL DA INRIATED PublicWorksSidewalks i�-ss GREEN SHEET No. � iNmawa iNmumnre ONTACTPERSON&PHONE �DEPARTMENTOIRECtOR CfTYCOUNCIL erryTvedl-266-6087 A�r'N �CRYATfORNEY ❑CfTYGLERK MU5TBEONCOUNdLAGENDABY(DAT� -� ROUiI G� � V Qpp � BUDGE( DIRECTOR ❑ FlN. & MGT. SERVICES DIR � 1 �8 C � Z7J �MAYOR(ORASSISTANi) 1❑ (�AUlICII RQ52H[Ch 1 U TALiOPSiGNATUflEPAGES _(CLIPALLLOCATIONSPoHSIGNAiUR� u ASSOCIATE DEP ENTALACCOUNrANT CTiON qEDUE5IED � j Reconstruct Sidewalk in Wards 4& 7(See attached lisi) F► 5 - aECOM�eENDanotas: n�ro�e (A) «ae�ea (a) PERSONAL SERVICE CONiRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS: PLANNINGCOMMISSION _CMLSERNCECOMMISSION 7, HasthispersoNfirtneverworketlunderaconVactforthistlepartment? CIBCqMrn�rrEE YES NO — — 2. Has this persoN6rtn everbeen a ciry employee? A sinFF _ YES NO Di5raICTCOUNCi� 3. Does Mis person/firm possess a skill not nortnaly possessed by any curtent city employee? — YES NO SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL O&IECTIVE? Explain all yes answers on separate sheet antl aifaeh to green sheM �� INfiIATING PROBLEM, 1 UE, O PoFIUNITY (WHO. WHAT. WHEN, WHERE, WH`n: The probiem "defective sidewalk" was caused by mukip{e problems, tree roots, poor subgrade materiaVs, freeze/thaw cycies, service life limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and corrected annually. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations. ADVAMAGES IF APPFOVED: � The community will benefit from this project because it will provide safe defect free sidewalks for its citizens. The sidewalk contsacts are done by private contractors generating private sector jobs as a result. DISADVAIJrAGES IF APPROVED: Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback because of construction procedures and assessments. Properry owners question the assessments, despite the fact [hat up to one-half the assessmen[ is C'ity subsidized. Having to assess for waik reconstruction remains a controversial issue. D15ADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED: This option would aliow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal injury suits, resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in repairs and replacement, as well as claim payouts. s�4�C'r�.;� i`:� ��w` i vc: t1'�i �� `� e�. ��J TOTAL AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION $ E4 ��l � j�Z C0.STlREVENUE 6UDGETED (CIRCLE ONE) YES No FUNDINGSOURCE 9q'^��6 � PtA 99 = 6 9 3o ,0�Q ACINITYNUMBER C99-2T752-078400000 PINANCIALINFORMATION:(EXPLAIN) B„ A�T - JS� �,DOO � � � c, ctB 99 = So;ooa