The URL can be used to link to this page

99-599CITY OF ST. PAUL FINAL ORDER ORlGfNAL CO CIL FI NO. ��— �`1 ( By File o. 599011 Voting Ward_5 In the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction at the followiug locations: South side W. Idaho Ave. from N. Oxford St. to W. 200'. "ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES �� RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstrucfion (replacement of old sidewalk) -$8.65 per &ont foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $1038 per front foot far a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100% of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.87 per square foot. All conner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MiJLTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100% of actual cost estimated to be approximately $5.23 per square foot. under Preliminary order �r� � � ,� approved "� The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof hauing been given as prescribed by the Ciry Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to saidproposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the unprovement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays � Benanav � Biakey ✓ Bostrom � Coleman .i Harris r Lantry r' Reiter 21n Favor �Against Adopted by Council: Date�._ ��. rqyy Certified Pa�se� � Council Secretary Mayor : Works Sidewatks ;T PEflSON & PHONE Tvedt-266-6087 OF SIGNANRE PAGES INfTIATED ,� y � �E 5-3-9� GREEN SHEET �+o� ��-��,� INRIAUDA7E INfiIAVDATE I�DEPAflTMEM�IRECTOR ❑CRYCOUNdL �CITYAITORNEY ❑CfT'QERK I�BUDGEfDIRECfOR ❑FM.&MGT.SERVICESDIR I� MAYOR (OR ASSI5TANT) QOpU0Ci1 RBS2dfCh �`�� I I DEPARTMEMALACCOUNTANT Construct Sidewalk in Ward 5(See attached list) _PV+NNING COMMISSION _qBCAMMITfEE A 51AFF "" `°' PERSONAL SEBVICE COMRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING RUESTIONS: _qVILSERVICECOMMISSION � ��ry�persoNfirtneverworkedunderacontracttorthisdepartment? - YES NO J 2. Has this persoNfirtn ever been a ciry employee? � YES NO DiSrRiCr CouNCiL 3. Does this persoNfirtn possess a skill not nortnally possessed by any curtent tlry employee? YES NO PPORTS WHICH COUNCI� OBJECTIVE? Explain a4l yes answers on separate sheet antl attach to green sheet � � fi1ATING BLEM. ISSUE, OPPORTUNITY (WHO. NM11AT. WHEN, WHERE, WHYf: The problem "defective sidewalk" was caused by multipfe problems, tree roots, poor subgrade materials, fteezefthaw�ycles, service life limits, chemical additives, eMreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide basis and mG�t be addressed and corrected annually. Left uncorrected, the sidewaVk condition woutd worsen to a state where it wouid be Unusabfe and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falis and possible litigations. JVANTAGES IF APPROVED: The community wili benefit from this project because it will provide safe defect free sidewalks for its citizens. The sidewalk contracts are done by private contractors generating private sector jobs as a resuli. Historically, the sidewaik reconstructions have created negative feedback because of construction procedures and assessments. Property owners quesiion the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-hali the assessment is City subsidized. Having to access for walk reconstruction remains a controversial issue. NOT APPROVED: This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in tum, will generate more personai injury suits, resufting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in repairs and replacement, as well as claim payouts. - �ux � `s�.^cS,�'.3"�� - .�'��'?��f �';:�� c� e� �a��9 AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION $ ��] QO _ QQ COST/REVENUE BUDGETED (CIRCLE ONE) YES NO JGSOURCE 9g-�,.06fi9 A. P t�A 99 �= 630 '.000 ACI7VITY NUMBER C99-2T752-4784-00000 ALINFOAMATION:(EXPWN) g� AS � j ��a�� _; � c, crs 99 = 50,000 �� S�� SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATION Ward 5 �9�DJl PROJECT: CONSTRUCT SIDEWALK S.S. W. IDAHO AVE. from N. O�ford St. to W. 200'. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is first time construction. • • ................................................................. CITY OF ST. PAUL PRELIMTNARY ORDER ORIGfNA� CO CIL F E NO. � � ! By File . S99011 Voting Wazd_5 In the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction at the following locations: South side W. Idaho Ave. from N. Oxford St. to W. 200'. *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTIOI3 RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three fanuly structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$8.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $1038 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100% of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.87 per square foot. All corner residential properties wiil receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewaik along and abutting the "long side" of the properiy. Mi1LTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100% of actual cost estimated to be approximately $5.23 per square foot. / / : The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1998 Public Improvement Aid. 2. That a public heazing be had on said improvement on the 23rd dav of June. 1999 at 530 P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hali and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. 3. That notice of said pubiic hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COtJNCILPERSONS Adopted by Council: Date_��Ryy Yeas Nays � enanav Certified Passed by Council Secretary ✓�lakey Bostrom - Ah,"�� Coleman _AtiSr �t Harris _ ,P� �In Fawr ✓Lantry ✓Reiter O Against B Y , _F--�� - - � 3 'E�bs<,� Mayor CITY OF ST. PAUL FINAL ORDER ORlGfNAL CO CIL FI NO. ��— �`1 ( By File o. 599011 Voting Ward_5 In the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction at the followiug locations: South side W. Idaho Ave. from N. Oxford St. to W. 200'. "ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES �� RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstrucfion (replacement of old sidewalk) -$8.65 per &ont foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $1038 per front foot far a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100% of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.87 per square foot. All conner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MiJLTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100% of actual cost estimated to be approximately $5.23 per square foot. under Preliminary order �r� � � ,� approved "� The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof hauing been given as prescribed by the Ciry Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to saidproposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the unprovement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays � Benanav � Biakey ✓ Bostrom � Coleman .i Harris r Lantry r' Reiter 21n Favor �Against Adopted by Council: Date�._ ��. rqyy Certified Pa�se� � Council Secretary Mayor : Works Sidewatks ;T PEflSON & PHONE Tvedt-266-6087 OF SIGNANRE PAGES INfTIATED ,� y � �E 5-3-9� GREEN SHEET �+o� ��-��,� INRIAUDA7E INfiIAVDATE I�DEPAflTMEM�IRECTOR ❑CRYCOUNdL �CITYAITORNEY ❑CfT'QERK I�BUDGEfDIRECfOR ❑FM.&MGT.SERVICESDIR I� MAYOR (OR ASSI5TANT) QOpU0Ci1 RBS2dfCh �`�� I I DEPARTMEMALACCOUNTANT Construct Sidewalk in Ward 5(See attached list) _PV+NNING COMMISSION _qBCAMMITfEE A 51AFF "" `°' PERSONAL SEBVICE COMRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING RUESTIONS: _qVILSERVICECOMMISSION � ��ry�persoNfirtneverworkedunderacontracttorthisdepartment? - YES NO J 2. Has this persoNfirtn ever been a ciry employee? � YES NO DiSrRiCr CouNCiL 3. Does this persoNfirtn possess a skill not nortnally possessed by any curtent tlry employee? YES NO PPORTS WHICH COUNCI� OBJECTIVE? Explain a4l yes answers on separate sheet antl attach to green sheet � � fi1ATING BLEM. ISSUE, OPPORTUNITY (WHO. NM11AT. WHEN, WHERE, WHYf: The problem "defective sidewalk" was caused by multipfe problems, tree roots, poor subgrade materials, fteezefthaw�ycles, service life limits, chemical additives, eMreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide basis and mG�t be addressed and corrected annually. Left uncorrected, the sidewaVk condition woutd worsen to a state where it wouid be Unusabfe and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falis and possible litigations. JVANTAGES IF APPROVED: The community wili benefit from this project because it will provide safe defect free sidewalks for its citizens. The sidewalk contracts are done by private contractors generating private sector jobs as a resuli. Historically, the sidewaik reconstructions have created negative feedback because of construction procedures and assessments. Property owners quesiion the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-hali the assessment is City subsidized. Having to access for walk reconstruction remains a controversial issue. NOT APPROVED: This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in tum, will generate more personai injury suits, resufting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in repairs and replacement, as well as claim payouts. - �ux � `s�.^cS,�'.3"�� - .�'��'?��f �';:�� c� e� �a��9 AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION $ ��] QO _ QQ COST/REVENUE BUDGETED (CIRCLE ONE) YES NO JGSOURCE 9g-�,.06fi9 A. P t�A 99 �= 630 '.000 ACI7VITY NUMBER C99-2T752-4784-00000 ALINFOAMATION:(EXPWN) g� AS � j ��a�� _; � c, crs 99 = 50,000 �� S�� SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATION Ward 5 �9�DJl PROJECT: CONSTRUCT SIDEWALK S.S. W. IDAHO AVE. from N. O�ford St. to W. 200'. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is first time construction. • • ................................................................. CITY OF ST. PAUL PRELIMTNARY ORDER ORIGfNA� CO CIL F E NO. � � ! By File . S99011 Voting Wazd_5 In the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction at the following locations: South side W. Idaho Ave. from N. Oxford St. to W. 200'. *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTIOI3 RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three fanuly structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$8.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $1038 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100% of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.87 per square foot. All corner residential properties wiil receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewaik along and abutting the "long side" of the properiy. Mi1LTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100% of actual cost estimated to be approximately $5.23 per square foot. / / : The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1998 Public Improvement Aid. 2. That a public heazing be had on said improvement on the 23rd dav of June. 1999 at 530 P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hali and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. 3. That notice of said pubiic hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COtJNCILPERSONS Adopted by Council: Date_��Ryy Yeas Nays � enanav Certified Passed by Council Secretary ✓�lakey Bostrom - Ah,"�� Coleman _AtiSr �t Harris _ ,P� �In Fawr ✓Lantry ✓Reiter O Against B Y , _F--�� - - � 3 'E�bs<,� Mayor CITY OF ST. PAUL FINAL ORDER ORlGfNAL CO CIL FI NO. ��— �`1 ( By File o. 599011 Voting Ward_5 In the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction at the followiug locations: South side W. Idaho Ave. from N. Oxford St. to W. 200'. "ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES �� RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstrucfion (replacement of old sidewalk) -$8.65 per &ont foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $1038 per front foot far a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100% of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.87 per square foot. All conner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MiJLTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100% of actual cost estimated to be approximately $5.23 per square foot. under Preliminary order �r� � � ,� approved "� The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof hauing been given as prescribed by the Ciry Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to saidproposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the unprovement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays � Benanav � Biakey ✓ Bostrom � Coleman .i Harris r Lantry r' Reiter 21n Favor �Against Adopted by Council: Date�._ ��. rqyy Certified Pa�se� � Council Secretary Mayor : Works Sidewatks ;T PEflSON & PHONE Tvedt-266-6087 OF SIGNANRE PAGES INfTIATED ,� y � �E 5-3-9� GREEN SHEET �+o� ��-��,� INRIAUDA7E INfiIAVDATE I�DEPAflTMEM�IRECTOR ❑CRYCOUNdL �CITYAITORNEY ❑CfT'QERK I�BUDGEfDIRECfOR ❑FM.&MGT.SERVICESDIR I� MAYOR (OR ASSI5TANT) QOpU0Ci1 RBS2dfCh �`�� I I DEPARTMEMALACCOUNTANT Construct Sidewalk in Ward 5(See attached list) _PV+NNING COMMISSION _qBCAMMITfEE A 51AFF "" `°' PERSONAL SEBVICE COMRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING RUESTIONS: _qVILSERVICECOMMISSION � ��ry�persoNfirtneverworkedunderacontracttorthisdepartment? - YES NO J 2. Has this persoNfirtn ever been a ciry employee? � YES NO DiSrRiCr CouNCiL 3. Does this persoNfirtn possess a skill not nortnally possessed by any curtent tlry employee? YES NO PPORTS WHICH COUNCI� OBJECTIVE? Explain a4l yes answers on separate sheet antl attach to green sheet � � fi1ATING BLEM. ISSUE, OPPORTUNITY (WHO. NM11AT. WHEN, WHERE, WHYf: The problem "defective sidewalk" was caused by multipfe problems, tree roots, poor subgrade materials, fteezefthaw�ycles, service life limits, chemical additives, eMreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide basis and mG�t be addressed and corrected annually. Left uncorrected, the sidewaVk condition woutd worsen to a state where it wouid be Unusabfe and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falis and possible litigations. JVANTAGES IF APPROVED: The community wili benefit from this project because it will provide safe defect free sidewalks for its citizens. The sidewalk contracts are done by private contractors generating private sector jobs as a resuli. Historically, the sidewaik reconstructions have created negative feedback because of construction procedures and assessments. Property owners quesiion the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-hali the assessment is City subsidized. Having to access for walk reconstruction remains a controversial issue. NOT APPROVED: This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in tum, will generate more personai injury suits, resufting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in repairs and replacement, as well as claim payouts. - �ux � `s�.^cS,�'.3"�� - .�'��'?��f �';:�� c� e� �a��9 AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION $ ��] QO _ QQ COST/REVENUE BUDGETED (CIRCLE ONE) YES NO JGSOURCE 9g-�,.06fi9 A. P t�A 99 �= 630 '.000 ACI7VITY NUMBER C99-2T752-4784-00000 ALINFOAMATION:(EXPWN) g� AS � j ��a�� _; � c, crs 99 = 50,000 �� S�� SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATION Ward 5 �9�DJl PROJECT: CONSTRUCT SIDEWALK S.S. W. IDAHO AVE. from N. O�ford St. to W. 200'. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is first time construction. • • ................................................................. CITY OF ST. PAUL PRELIMTNARY ORDER ORIGfNA� CO CIL F E NO. � � ! By File . S99011 Voting Wazd_5 In the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction at the following locations: South side W. Idaho Ave. from N. Oxford St. to W. 200'. *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTIOI3 RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three fanuly structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$8.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $1038 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100% of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.87 per square foot. All corner residential properties wiil receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewaik along and abutting the "long side" of the properiy. Mi1LTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100% of actual cost estimated to be approximately $5.23 per square foot. / / : The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1998 Public Improvement Aid. 2. That a public heazing be had on said improvement on the 23rd dav of June. 1999 at 530 P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hali and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. 3. That notice of said pubiic hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COtJNCILPERSONS Adopted by Council: Date_��Ryy Yeas Nays � enanav Certified Passed by Council Secretary ✓�lakey Bostrom - Ah,"�� Coleman _AtiSr �t Harris _ ,P� �In Fawr ✓Lantry ✓Reiter O Against B Y , _F--�� - - � 3 'E�bs<,� Mayor