The URL can be used to link to this page

99-598CZTY OF ST. PAUL COUNCIL FILE NO. ��5� OO � £INAL ORDER / � hf � By � • V;ii{�� Voting Ward 7 In the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction at the folloming locations: S99073 - Both sides East Third Street from English Street to Clarence Street. Laid over from June 9, 1999 *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$8.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $10.38 per front foot £or a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100a of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.87 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately 55.23 per square foot. under Preliminary order approved The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City of£icers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays ✓ Benanav � Blakey v Bostrom ✓ Coleman � Harris ✓ Lantry J Reiter �In Favor �Against Adopted by Council: Date Certified/P"assed � Crf Secretary � %�� Mayor : Works Sidewalks :T PERSON b PHONE Tvedt-266-6087 GREEN (on n5515TNii) sOFSIGNANHEPAGES __ (CIIPALLLOCATONSFORSIGNA7UfiE] I I ASSa�ATE � No. �� - iHmumarE �C[iYCAUNGI ❑ CITV CIERK ❑ FlN. S MGT. SFAVICES DIR Q Councl Research � �un neuuea� e� Reconstruct Sidewalk 8 Widen Driveway Apron in Wards 6& 7(See attached Iist) �5�� 1��5 �-59901A-5990'I3 R �' COMMISSION 5iAFF CAUNQL � PERSONALSERVICEGOMRACTSMU5TANSWFRTHEFOLLOWING�UESTIONS: CIVILSERVICECOMMISSION 7. HasthispersoNfirtneverworkedunderaconVac[forthisdepartment? YES NO � 2. Has this persoNfirtn ever been a ciry employee? • YES NO 3. Dces this psrsoNfirtn possess a skill not nortnally passessed by any current ciry emptoyee? YES NO Explain all yes answers on separate sheet and attach to green sheet The probiem "defective sidewaik" was caused by multiple problems, tree roots, poor subgrade materials, freezeRhaw cycles, service life limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These probiems occur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and corrected annually. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations. IFAPPROVED: The community will benefit trom this projeci because it wili provide sate defed free sidewalks for its citizens. The sidewalk contracts are done by private contractors generating private sector jobs as a resuli. IFAPPROVED� Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback because of construction procedures and assessments. Property owners question the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-half ihe assessment is City subsidized. Having to assess for walk reconstruction remains a controversial issue. DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewaik stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personai injury suits, resuiting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in repairs and replacement, as well as claim payouts. - AMOUNT OFTRANSACTION S 1 y, S`�� . S �GSOURCE 99-M-0669 A, PIA 99 = AL INFORMATION: (EXPLAIN) B � A5T = C, CIB 99 = 111 50 , 000 ACINfTY NUMBER �r'�ti��s $�-42S�a?��§�. vL'?�$@i ,�� , � ��g� TED(CIRCIEONE) YES tto CZTY OF ST. PAUL COUNCIL FILE NO. ��5� OO � £INAL ORDER / � hf � By � • V;ii{�� Voting Ward 7 In the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction at the folloming locations: S99073 - Both sides East Third Street from English Street to Clarence Street. Laid over from June 9, 1999 *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$8.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $10.38 per front foot £or a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100a of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.87 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately 55.23 per square foot. under Preliminary order approved The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City of£icers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays ✓ Benanav � Blakey v Bostrom ✓ Coleman � Harris ✓ Lantry J Reiter �In Favor �Against Adopted by Council: Date Certified/P"assed � Crf Secretary � %�� Mayor : Works Sidewalks :T PERSON b PHONE Tvedt-266-6087 GREEN (on n5515TNii) sOFSIGNANHEPAGES __ (CIIPALLLOCATONSFORSIGNA7UfiE] I I ASSa�ATE � No. �� - iHmumarE �C[iYCAUNGI ❑ CITV CIERK ❑ FlN. S MGT. SFAVICES DIR Q Councl Research � �un neuuea� e� Reconstruct Sidewalk 8 Widen Driveway Apron in Wards 6& 7(See attached Iist) �5�� 1��5 �-59901A-5990'I3 R �' COMMISSION 5iAFF CAUNQL � PERSONALSERVICEGOMRACTSMU5TANSWFRTHEFOLLOWING�UESTIONS: CIVILSERVICECOMMISSION 7. HasthispersoNfirtneverworkedunderaconVac[forthisdepartment? YES NO � 2. Has this persoNfirtn ever been a ciry employee? • YES NO 3. Dces this psrsoNfirtn possess a skill not nortnally passessed by any current ciry emptoyee? YES NO Explain all yes answers on separate sheet and attach to green sheet The probiem "defective sidewaik" was caused by multiple problems, tree roots, poor subgrade materials, freezeRhaw cycles, service life limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These probiems occur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and corrected annually. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations. IFAPPROVED: The community will benefit trom this projeci because it wili provide sate defed free sidewalks for its citizens. The sidewalk contracts are done by private contractors generating private sector jobs as a resuli. IFAPPROVED� Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback because of construction procedures and assessments. Property owners question the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-half ihe assessment is City subsidized. Having to assess for walk reconstruction remains a controversial issue. DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewaik stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personai injury suits, resuiting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in repairs and replacement, as well as claim payouts. - AMOUNT OFTRANSACTION S 1 y, S`�� . S �GSOURCE 99-M-0669 A, PIA 99 = AL INFORMATION: (EXPLAIN) B � A5T = C, CIB 99 = 111 50 , 000 ACINfTY NUMBER �r'�ti��s $�-42S�a?��§�. vL'?�$@i ,�� , � ��g� TED(CIRCIEONE) YES tto CZTY OF ST. PAUL COUNCIL FILE NO. ��5� OO � £INAL ORDER / � hf � By � • V;ii{�� Voting Ward 7 In the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction at the folloming locations: S99073 - Both sides East Third Street from English Street to Clarence Street. Laid over from June 9, 1999 *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$8.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $10.38 per front foot £or a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100a of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.87 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately 55.23 per square foot. under Preliminary order approved The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City of£icers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays ✓ Benanav � Blakey v Bostrom ✓ Coleman � Harris ✓ Lantry J Reiter �In Favor �Against Adopted by Council: Date Certified/P"assed � Crf Secretary � %�� Mayor : Works Sidewalks :T PERSON b PHONE Tvedt-266-6087 GREEN (on n5515TNii) sOFSIGNANHEPAGES __ (CIIPALLLOCATONSFORSIGNA7UfiE] I I ASSa�ATE � No. �� - iHmumarE �C[iYCAUNGI ❑ CITV CIERK ❑ FlN. S MGT. SFAVICES DIR Q Councl Research � �un neuuea� e� Reconstruct Sidewalk 8 Widen Driveway Apron in Wards 6& 7(See attached Iist) �5�� 1��5 �-59901A-5990'I3 R �' COMMISSION 5iAFF CAUNQL � PERSONALSERVICEGOMRACTSMU5TANSWFRTHEFOLLOWING�UESTIONS: CIVILSERVICECOMMISSION 7. HasthispersoNfirtneverworkedunderaconVac[forthisdepartment? YES NO � 2. Has this persoNfirtn ever been a ciry employee? • YES NO 3. Dces this psrsoNfirtn possess a skill not nortnally passessed by any current ciry emptoyee? YES NO Explain all yes answers on separate sheet and attach to green sheet The probiem "defective sidewaik" was caused by multiple problems, tree roots, poor subgrade materials, freezeRhaw cycles, service life limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These probiems occur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and corrected annually. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations. IFAPPROVED: The community will benefit trom this projeci because it wili provide sate defed free sidewalks for its citizens. The sidewalk contracts are done by private contractors generating private sector jobs as a resuli. IFAPPROVED� Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback because of construction procedures and assessments. Property owners question the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-half ihe assessment is City subsidized. Having to assess for walk reconstruction remains a controversial issue. DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewaik stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personai injury suits, resuiting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in repairs and replacement, as well as claim payouts. - AMOUNT OFTRANSACTION S 1 y, S`�� . S �GSOURCE 99-M-0669 A, PIA 99 = AL INFORMATION: (EXPLAIN) B � A5T = C, CIB 99 = 111 50 , 000 ACINfTY NUMBER �r'�ti��s $�-42S�a?��§�. vL'?�$@i ,�� , � ��g� TED(CIRCIEONE) YES tto