The URL can be used to link to this page

99-596Y CITY OF ST. PAUL FINAI� ORDER ORIGiNAL COUNCIL FILE NO B Fi No. S9 6 Vo 'nq Ward 1 �~�� Zn the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction at the £ollowing locations: S99064 - Both sides Thomas Avenue from Arundel Street to North Western Avenue Laid over from June 9, 1999 *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$8.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $10.38 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100°s of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.87 per square foot. Al1 corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (MOre than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $5.23 per square foot. under Preliminary order approved The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Adopted by Council: Date Yeas Nays J Benanav Certifie�sed Iaf�c�,raA�» ✓ Blakey ✓ Bostrom / Coleman ✓ Harris ✓ Lantry ✓ Reiter �In Favor �Against By 1 Secretary � �� Mayor .��u$u� Works Sidewaiks 266-6�8� ��TUt� q � 1�q9 IGREEN : OOEP0.RTMENTDIRECTOR � crtr arrowver � BUDGEf DIREGfOR O MAYOR (Ofl ASSISTANT) � r_ - �L NO. v INRIAVDATE ❑ CRY CAUNCIL ❑ CRY CLEFK ❑ FlN. E MGL SERYICES Diq. Q Councii Researoh. �L�OFSIGNATUHEPAGES _ � _ (CIJPAILLOCAT10N5FOHSIGNATUR� u 0.SSOCIpTE u pEP ONRE�UESiEO ��• r � �� . +., �� Reconstruct Sidewalk in Ward 1(See attached Iist) r ��j+ cu t�r�ti tic�n�.- saan�.� ��N �UNEg TO 1�� 23 """'""" """'""° w ' "' °°'°'" �°� pEE2SONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWEB 7HE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS: _PIANNINGCAMMISS�ON _CMLSER�ICECAMMISSION �, HasihispersoNfirtneverworkedunderacontrdctforthisdepartment? cI8 CqMMmEE YES NO — — 2. Has fhis persoNfirtn ever bee� a ciry employee? ? sinFF _ YES NO _DISTRICTCAUNqL 3. Does this persoNfirtn possess a skill not nortnaly possessed by any curtent ciry employee? YES Pt0 Explain all yes answers on separate sheet and attach to green sheet The probtem "defective sidewaik" was caused 6y multipie problems, tree roots, poor subgrade materiais, freezeRhaw cyctes, service Iife limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These probiems occur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and corrected annually. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition wouid worsen to a state where it would be unusabie and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations. The community will benefit from this project because it will provide safe defect free sidewalks for its citizens. The sidewalk contracts are done by prrvaie contradors generating private sector jobs as a resu{t. IF APPAOVED: Ffistorically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback because of construction procedures and assessments. Property owners question the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized. Having to assess for walk reconsiruction remains a controversial issue. DISADVANTAGESIFNOTAPPROVED: This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal injury suits, resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in repairs and replacement, as well as claim payouts. �i�€�� 9��iL�i 5�,+��?i?f ��fl�. �. �� AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION S S J 263 , 20 COST/REVENUE BUDGETED (CIRCLE ONE) YES NO JGSOURCE 99-M-0669 A, PIA 99 = 630,000 qCININNUMBER css-2nsz-o�sa-00000 FLINFORMATION:(EXPLAIN) B� AsT = 35> >OOO C, CIB 99 = 50,000 Y CITY OF ST. PAUL FINAI� ORDER ORIGiNAL COUNCIL FILE NO B Fi No. S9 6 Vo 'nq Ward 1 �~�� Zn the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction at the £ollowing locations: S99064 - Both sides Thomas Avenue from Arundel Street to North Western Avenue Laid over from June 9, 1999 *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$8.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $10.38 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100°s of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.87 per square foot. Al1 corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (MOre than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $5.23 per square foot. under Preliminary order approved The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Adopted by Council: Date Yeas Nays J Benanav Certifie�sed Iaf�c�,raA�» ✓ Blakey ✓ Bostrom / Coleman ✓ Harris ✓ Lantry ✓ Reiter �In Favor �Against By 1 Secretary � �� Mayor .��u$u� Works Sidewaiks 266-6�8� ��TUt� q � 1�q9 IGREEN : OOEP0.RTMENTDIRECTOR � crtr arrowver � BUDGEf DIREGfOR O MAYOR (Ofl ASSISTANT) � r_ - �L NO. v INRIAVDATE ❑ CRY CAUNCIL ❑ CRY CLEFK ❑ FlN. E MGL SERYICES Diq. Q Councii Researoh. �L�OFSIGNATUHEPAGES _ � _ (CIJPAILLOCAT10N5FOHSIGNATUR� u 0.SSOCIpTE u pEP ONRE�UESiEO ��• r � �� . +., �� Reconstruct Sidewalk in Ward 1(See attached Iist) r ��j+ cu t�r�ti tic�n�.- saan�.� ��N �UNEg TO 1�� 23 """'""" """'""° w ' "' °°'°'" �°� pEE2SONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWEB 7HE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS: _PIANNINGCAMMISS�ON _CMLSER�ICECAMMISSION �, HasihispersoNfirtneverworkedunderacontrdctforthisdepartment? cI8 CqMMmEE YES NO — — 2. Has fhis persoNfirtn ever bee� a ciry employee? ? sinFF _ YES NO _DISTRICTCAUNqL 3. Does this persoNfirtn possess a skill not nortnaly possessed by any curtent ciry employee? YES Pt0 Explain all yes answers on separate sheet and attach to green sheet The probtem "defective sidewaik" was caused 6y multipie problems, tree roots, poor subgrade materiais, freezeRhaw cyctes, service Iife limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These probiems occur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and corrected annually. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition wouid worsen to a state where it would be unusabie and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations. The community will benefit from this project because it will provide safe defect free sidewalks for its citizens. The sidewalk contracts are done by prrvaie contradors generating private sector jobs as a resu{t. IF APPAOVED: Ffistorically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback because of construction procedures and assessments. Property owners question the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized. Having to assess for walk reconsiruction remains a controversial issue. DISADVANTAGESIFNOTAPPROVED: This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal injury suits, resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in repairs and replacement, as well as claim payouts. �i�€�� 9��iL�i 5�,+��?i?f ��fl�. �. �� AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION S S J 263 , 20 COST/REVENUE BUDGETED (CIRCLE ONE) YES NO JGSOURCE 99-M-0669 A, PIA 99 = 630,000 qCININNUMBER css-2nsz-o�sa-00000 FLINFORMATION:(EXPLAIN) B� AsT = 35> >OOO C, CIB 99 = 50,000 Y CITY OF ST. PAUL FINAI� ORDER ORIGiNAL COUNCIL FILE NO B Fi No. S9 6 Vo 'nq Ward 1 �~�� Zn the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction at the £ollowing locations: S99064 - Both sides Thomas Avenue from Arundel Street to North Western Avenue Laid over from June 9, 1999 *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$8.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $10.38 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100°s of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.87 per square foot. Al1 corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (MOre than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $5.23 per square foot. under Preliminary order approved The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Adopted by Council: Date Yeas Nays J Benanav Certifie�sed Iaf�c�,raA�» ✓ Blakey ✓ Bostrom / Coleman ✓ Harris ✓ Lantry ✓ Reiter �In Favor �Against By 1 Secretary � �� Mayor .��u$u� Works Sidewaiks 266-6�8� ��TUt� q � 1�q9 IGREEN : OOEP0.RTMENTDIRECTOR � crtr arrowver � BUDGEf DIREGfOR O MAYOR (Ofl ASSISTANT) � r_ - �L NO. v INRIAVDATE ❑ CRY CAUNCIL ❑ CRY CLEFK ❑ FlN. E MGL SERYICES Diq. Q Councii Researoh. �L�OFSIGNATUHEPAGES _ � _ (CIJPAILLOCAT10N5FOHSIGNATUR� u 0.SSOCIpTE u pEP ONRE�UESiEO ��• r � �� . +., �� Reconstruct Sidewalk in Ward 1(See attached Iist) r ��j+ cu t�r�ti tic�n�.- saan�.� ��N �UNEg TO 1�� 23 """'""" """'""° w ' "' °°'°'" �°� pEE2SONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWEB 7HE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS: _PIANNINGCAMMISS�ON _CMLSER�ICECAMMISSION �, HasihispersoNfirtneverworkedunderacontrdctforthisdepartment? cI8 CqMMmEE YES NO — — 2. Has fhis persoNfirtn ever bee� a ciry employee? ? sinFF _ YES NO _DISTRICTCAUNqL 3. Does this persoNfirtn possess a skill not nortnaly possessed by any curtent ciry employee? YES Pt0 Explain all yes answers on separate sheet and attach to green sheet The probtem "defective sidewaik" was caused 6y multipie problems, tree roots, poor subgrade materiais, freezeRhaw cyctes, service Iife limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These probiems occur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and corrected annually. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition wouid worsen to a state where it would be unusabie and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations. The community will benefit from this project because it will provide safe defect free sidewalks for its citizens. The sidewalk contracts are done by prrvaie contradors generating private sector jobs as a resu{t. IF APPAOVED: Ffistorically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback because of construction procedures and assessments. Property owners question the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized. Having to assess for walk reconsiruction remains a controversial issue. DISADVANTAGESIFNOTAPPROVED: This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal injury suits, resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in repairs and replacement, as well as claim payouts. �i�€�� 9��iL�i 5�,+��?i?f ��fl�. �. �� AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION S S J 263 , 20 COST/REVENUE BUDGETED (CIRCLE ONE) YES NO JGSOURCE 99-M-0669 A, PIA 99 = 630,000 qCININNUMBER css-2nsz-o�sa-00000 FLINFORMATION:(EXPLAIN) B� AsT = 35> >OOO C, CIB 99 = 50,000