The URL can be used to link to this page

99-595CITY OF ST. PAUL �i�� .iJf� FINAL ORDER � R! G I N A L ��z � �%9 COUNCIL ILE N0. � B File o. S 032 & S9 03 Vot nq War 1& 2 In the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction at the £ollowing locations: 1� 599032 - North side Portland Avenue £rom North Oxford Street to North Chatsworth Street. Delete 1005 and 1025 Portland Avenue S99036 - South side Portland Avenue from North Oxford Street to North Chatsworth Street. Laid over from June 2, 1999 *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$8.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $10.38 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. Al1 other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 1000 of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.87 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MUI,TI-RESIDENTIAL (MOre than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $5.23 per square foot. under Preliminary order approved The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers sha11 calculate a11 expenses incurred therein and sha11 report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays ✓ Benanav � Blakey ✓ Bostrom r Coleman ✓ Harris � Lantry .� Reiter �In Favor �Against Adopted by Council Certifie as BY - � - 7//, Date �z / yy Secretary Mayor HEARING DATE — JUNE 2. 19 Works Sidewaiks 4-16-99 �GREEN ��S EET c � �� vrv�n��rcnavrvarntine RI � A � INITIAUDATE erry Tvedt - 266-6087 ASSiGN 0 DEPARThIENT DIRECTOR ❑ CYfY COUNCIL NUMBERFOR �� ❑��nG�K IUSTBEONCOUNCIIAGENDABY(DA'f� April 28, 1999 O R D �C' ��1DGElDIRECiOR �FlN.SMGT.SERVICESDIR For public hearing on June 2, 1999 Q��'OR(OflA5S1$TANT) � Councii Research OTALaOF51GNAiUpEPAGES _ (CLJPALLLOCAitON$FOR9C.NA7Lq� u q$SpQq'(E TlAENTp�qCCpUryTpN7 �Cf10N pEQUESTED Reconstruct Sidewalk in Wards 1 R 2(See attached list) �1�'�`� S'��2.`�- J��i �A'N�C� �t1IM �'Mil� 7 `If1 ii� Z� GVIL SEANCE COMMISSION CAMMf1TEE WHICH CAUNdL OBJECTIVE? PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS: 1. Has this persoNfirtn ever worked u(Wer a contract for Nis tlepartment? YES NO 2. Has this persoNfirtn ever been a city empioyee? YES NO 3. Does Uis persoNfirtn possess a skill not nortnally possessed by any current ciry empioyee? YES NO Ezpiain all yes answers aa separate sheet antl attach to green sheet RIATING PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPORTUNT' (WHO, WHAT, WHEN, WHERE, WH1�: - � The problem "defective sidewalk" was caused by multiple problems, tree roots, poor subgrade materiais, freezeRhaw cycles, service life limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and corrected annually. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it wouid be unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from fails and possible litigations. The community will benefit from this project because it will provide safe defect free sidewalks for its citizens. The sidewalk coniracts are done by private contractors generating private sector jobs as a result. Historically, the sidewaik reconstructions have created negative feedback because of construction procedures and assessments. Property owners question the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized. Having to assess for walk reconstruction remains a controversial issue. This option wouid allow the infrastructure of sidewaik stock to deteriorate, which in turn, wili generate more personai injury suits, resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in repairs and replacement, as well as claim payouts. C.A�U53� F�$S�2"^�S �``,^-.r?�^-L," , '.. �. i; - a r r AMOUNTOFTRANSACTION$ 26, jO4.9G COSTlREYENUEBUDGETED(CIRCLEONE) YES No +csouRCe 99-ht-o669 A, PfA 99 = 630,000 qCINRYNUMBER css-zns2-o�sa-00000 ALINFOflMAT10N:(EXPLAIN) B� AST = 351 �� C, Ct6 99 = 50,000 CITY OF ST. PAUL �i�� .iJf� FINAL ORDER � R! G I N A L ��z � �%9 COUNCIL ILE N0. � B File o. S 032 & S9 03 Vot nq War 1& 2 In the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction at the £ollowing locations: 1� 599032 - North side Portland Avenue £rom North Oxford Street to North Chatsworth Street. Delete 1005 and 1025 Portland Avenue S99036 - South side Portland Avenue from North Oxford Street to North Chatsworth Street. Laid over from June 2, 1999 *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$8.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $10.38 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. Al1 other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 1000 of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.87 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MUI,TI-RESIDENTIAL (MOre than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $5.23 per square foot. under Preliminary order approved The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers sha11 calculate a11 expenses incurred therein and sha11 report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays ✓ Benanav � Blakey ✓ Bostrom r Coleman ✓ Harris � Lantry .� Reiter �In Favor �Against Adopted by Council Certifie as BY - � - 7//, Date �z / yy Secretary Mayor HEARING DATE — JUNE 2. 19 Works Sidewaiks 4-16-99 �GREEN ��S EET c � �� vrv�n��rcnavrvarntine RI � A � INITIAUDATE erry Tvedt - 266-6087 ASSiGN 0 DEPARThIENT DIRECTOR ❑ CYfY COUNCIL NUMBERFOR �� ❑��nG�K IUSTBEONCOUNCIIAGENDABY(DA'f� April 28, 1999 O R D �C' ��1DGElDIRECiOR �FlN.SMGT.SERVICESDIR For public hearing on June 2, 1999 Q��'OR(OflA5S1$TANT) � Councii Research OTALaOF51GNAiUpEPAGES _ (CLJPALLLOCAitON$FOR9C.NA7Lq� u q$SpQq'(E TlAENTp�qCCpUryTpN7 �Cf10N pEQUESTED Reconstruct Sidewalk in Wards 1 R 2(See attached list) �1�'�`� S'��2.`�- J��i �A'N�C� �t1IM �'Mil� 7 `If1 ii� Z� GVIL SEANCE COMMISSION CAMMf1TEE WHICH CAUNdL OBJECTIVE? PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS: 1. Has this persoNfirtn ever worked u(Wer a contract for Nis tlepartment? YES NO 2. Has this persoNfirtn ever been a city empioyee? YES NO 3. Does Uis persoNfirtn possess a skill not nortnally possessed by any current ciry empioyee? YES NO Ezpiain all yes answers aa separate sheet antl attach to green sheet RIATING PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPORTUNT' (WHO, WHAT, WHEN, WHERE, WH1�: - � The problem "defective sidewalk" was caused by multiple problems, tree roots, poor subgrade materiais, freezeRhaw cycles, service life limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and corrected annually. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it wouid be unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from fails and possible litigations. The community will benefit from this project because it will provide safe defect free sidewalks for its citizens. The sidewalk coniracts are done by private contractors generating private sector jobs as a result. Historically, the sidewaik reconstructions have created negative feedback because of construction procedures and assessments. Property owners question the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized. Having to assess for walk reconstruction remains a controversial issue. This option wouid allow the infrastructure of sidewaik stock to deteriorate, which in turn, wili generate more personai injury suits, resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in repairs and replacement, as well as claim payouts. C.A�U53� F�$S�2"^�S �``,^-.r?�^-L," , '.. �. i; - a r r AMOUNTOFTRANSACTION$ 26, jO4.9G COSTlREYENUEBUDGETED(CIRCLEONE) YES No +csouRCe 99-ht-o669 A, PfA 99 = 630,000 qCINRYNUMBER css-zns2-o�sa-00000 ALINFOflMAT10N:(EXPLAIN) B� AST = 351 �� C, Ct6 99 = 50,000 CITY OF ST. PAUL �i�� .iJf� FINAL ORDER � R! G I N A L ��z � �%9 COUNCIL ILE N0. � B File o. S 032 & S9 03 Vot nq War 1& 2 In the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction at the £ollowing locations: 1� 599032 - North side Portland Avenue £rom North Oxford Street to North Chatsworth Street. Delete 1005 and 1025 Portland Avenue S99036 - South side Portland Avenue from North Oxford Street to North Chatsworth Street. Laid over from June 2, 1999 *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$8.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $10.38 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. Al1 other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 1000 of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.87 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MUI,TI-RESIDENTIAL (MOre than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $5.23 per square foot. under Preliminary order approved The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers sha11 calculate a11 expenses incurred therein and sha11 report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays ✓ Benanav � Blakey ✓ Bostrom r Coleman ✓ Harris � Lantry .� Reiter �In Favor �Against Adopted by Council Certifie as BY - � - 7//, Date �z / yy Secretary Mayor HEARING DATE — JUNE 2. 19 Works Sidewaiks 4-16-99 �GREEN ��S EET c � �� vrv�n��rcnavrvarntine RI � A � INITIAUDATE erry Tvedt - 266-6087 ASSiGN 0 DEPARThIENT DIRECTOR ❑ CYfY COUNCIL NUMBERFOR �� ❑��nG�K IUSTBEONCOUNCIIAGENDABY(DA'f� April 28, 1999 O R D �C' ��1DGElDIRECiOR �FlN.SMGT.SERVICESDIR For public hearing on June 2, 1999 Q��'OR(OflA5S1$TANT) � Councii Research OTALaOF51GNAiUpEPAGES _ (CLJPALLLOCAitON$FOR9C.NA7Lq� u q$SpQq'(E TlAENTp�qCCpUryTpN7 �Cf10N pEQUESTED Reconstruct Sidewalk in Wards 1 R 2(See attached list) �1�'�`� S'��2.`�- J��i �A'N�C� �t1IM �'Mil� 7 `If1 ii� Z� GVIL SEANCE COMMISSION CAMMf1TEE WHICH CAUNdL OBJECTIVE? PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS: 1. Has this persoNfirtn ever worked u(Wer a contract for Nis tlepartment? YES NO 2. Has this persoNfirtn ever been a city empioyee? YES NO 3. Does Uis persoNfirtn possess a skill not nortnally possessed by any current ciry empioyee? YES NO Ezpiain all yes answers aa separate sheet antl attach to green sheet RIATING PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPORTUNT' (WHO, WHAT, WHEN, WHERE, WH1�: - � The problem "defective sidewalk" was caused by multiple problems, tree roots, poor subgrade materiais, freezeRhaw cycles, service life limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and corrected annually. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it wouid be unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from fails and possible litigations. The community will benefit from this project because it will provide safe defect free sidewalks for its citizens. The sidewalk coniracts are done by private contractors generating private sector jobs as a result. Historically, the sidewaik reconstructions have created negative feedback because of construction procedures and assessments. Property owners question the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized. Having to assess for walk reconstruction remains a controversial issue. This option wouid allow the infrastructure of sidewaik stock to deteriorate, which in turn, wili generate more personai injury suits, resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in repairs and replacement, as well as claim payouts. C.A�U53� F�$S�2"^�S �``,^-.r?�^-L," , '.. �. i; - a r r AMOUNTOFTRANSACTION$ 26, jO4.9G COSTlREYENUEBUDGETED(CIRCLEONE) YES No +csouRCe 99-ht-o669 A, PfA 99 = 630,000 qCINRYNUMBER css-zns2-o�sa-00000 ALINFOflMAT10N:(EXPLAIN) B� AST = 351 �� C, Ct6 99 = 50,000