The URL can be used to link to this page

99-545CITY OF ST. PAUL FI23AL ORDER �irl£ y�11� 1� �/unc. 9, /��i9 COUNC FILE NO. qq� S�S By � �C� File No. 599069 - 599073 Voting Ward 6,7 In the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction at the £ollowing locations: Ward 6 S99069 - Both sides Ames Avenue from Van Dyke Street to North Hazel Street. �� S99070 - South side East Maryland Avenue from Hazelwood Street to Herbert Street at 1624 East Maryland Avenue Only. 599071 - Both sides Mechanic Avenue from Van Dyke Street to North Hazel Street. Ward 7 S99072 - Both sides East Fourth Street from North Howard Street to North McKnight Road. S�S99073 - Both sides East Third Street from English Street to Clarence Street. LA, a o� .� / J�,,,,% 2s qq-S45 *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$8.65 per front foot for a£ive (5) foot wide walk and $10.38 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100% of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.87 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $5.23 per square foot. under Preliminary order \� -^ �J�a approved q� , The Council of the City of Saint Pau1 has conducted a p lic hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has Pully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays �/ Benariav ✓ Blakey ✓ Bostrom ✓ Coleman � Harris r Lantry r/ Reiter 7 In Favor �Against Adopted by Council Certified Passed by B �Ga%`�/"!/� 1 Secretary Date /y y �� Mayor �1 c �6-�' � �� -l�� D PARTMENr/OFFI COUN L OAiEINfTIATED NO. � PublicWorksSidewalks 5-99 GREEN SHEET � CONTACT PERSON & PIiONE � DEPARTMINf OIflEGTOR ❑ CT' CAUNCIL Jerry Tvedt - 266-6087 ��+ crrv nrrovwer ❑ cm c�K NUMBERf-0R MUSTBEONCWNCILAGENDABY(DA7t� � � ft01lIING �g�p(E7DIflECTOR ❑FlN.&MGf.SERN R 7/{^�l� `�� ROEft �MAYOR(ORASSISTAtJT) 1❑ Cpf1I1C11 R8S28fCh OTALSOFSIGNATUREPAGES _(CLIPALLLOCATONSPoRSIGNANR� u ASSOCIATE u DEP ALACCOUNTANT fiEQUESTID Reconstruct Sidewalk & Widen Driveway Apron in Wards 6& 7(See attached list) �1►��5 5 — fYI RECAMMENDA'rIONS:Appruve(A)orReject(R) . PERSONAI.SEHVICECONIftACTSMUSTANSWERTHEFOLLOWINGQUESTIONS: PLANNINGCOMMISSION _CMLSERNCECOMMISSION �, HysMispersonlfirtneverwo`IcedunderacoMrac[forthisdeparVnern? deCOMMirrg YES NO — — 2. Has this person/firtn ever been a ciry empbyee? A srpFF _ YES NO DISIAICT COUNqL 3. Does ihis personffnm possess a siall not normally possessed by any wrrent ciry employee? — — YES NO SU�oFlrS wriiCH couNaL oa�ECiivE? F�cplain all yes answers on separaM sheet and attach to green sheet V INf�IATiNGPROBLEM,I UE.OPPORTUNffY(WHO, WHAT, WHEN, WHERE, WHY): , ' The problem "defective sidewalk" was caused by multiple problems, tree roots, poor subgrade,materials, freezefthaw cycles, service life limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a-cilywide basis and must be addressed and corrected annually. Left �ncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a siate where it would be unusabie and subject to increased pedesVian injuries from falls and possible litigations. ADVANTAGESIFAPPR�VEO: � - The community will benefit from this project because it will provide safe defect free sidewalks for its citizens. The sidewalk contracts are done by private contractors genetating private sector jobs as a result. , DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED: � Historicalry, the sidewalk reconstructions have cteated negative feedback because of construction procedures and assessments. Property.owners question the assessments, despite the fact thai up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized. Having to assess for walk reconstruction remains a controversial issue. � �..°. =T;�!,� ?':� . ... ., ., _. _�., �� a �i 3� w; e� DISADVAPfrAGES IF NOTAPPFOVED: This option wouid allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in tum, wiil generate more personal injury suits, resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in repairs and replacement, as well as claim payouts. OTAL AMOUNf OF TRANSACTION S � g.3�{H , 3L - COSTIREVENUE BUDGETED (CIRCLE ON� YES No FUNDINGSOURCE 94 `.'M^Q6.��. a� P('A �9 = F)3� AqTViTYNUMeER C99-21752-0784-00000 flNANCIALINFORMAiION:(IXPLAIN) B AST pp � 3J, y OOO �� C�B� JJ ° SQp�O . , . �19 -s N S SUNIMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMII�NDATIONS r.... ♦ I' � r� a � PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. AMES AVE. from Van Dyke St. to N. Hazel St. INITIATING ACITON: This order was initiated by the D'uector of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, water pockets, asphalt patches, disintegrated, scaled, setded and cracked panels. PRO.TECT: WIDEN DRIVEWAY APRON S.S. E. MARYI,AND AVE. from Hazelwood St. to Herbert St. at 1624 E. Maryland Ave. Only. IIVITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This project consists of widening the driveway apron on both sides for Fire Station #9 for easier fire vehicle maneuverability. � PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. MECHANIC AVE. from Van Dyke St. to N. Aazel St. �� r IIVITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public � necessity on the basis of two (2) complaints, a petition with one (1) signer and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, water pockets, settled and cracked panels. q9-�� SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOlVIl1�NDATIONS Wazd 7 PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. E. FOURTH ST. from N. Howazd St. to N. McKnight Rd. 5 i� IriITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of a petition with one (1) signer and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, disintegrated,scaled and cracked panels. PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT STDEWALK B.S. E. THII2D ST. from English St. to Clarence St. 5� IIVITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of five (5) complaints and an inspection of the wa1k. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, scaled, settled and cracked panels. atq- 5y � CITY OF ST. PAUL PRELIMINARY ORDER COUNC FI E NO. �0. � J`p. a0 By C� Fil 99069 - S99073 Voting Ward_ 6,7 In the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction at the following locations: Ward 6 599069 - Both sides Ames Avenue from Van Dyke Street to North Hazel Street. 599070 - South side East Maryland Avenue from Hazelwood Street to Herbert at 1624 East Maryland Avenue Only. S99071 - Both sides Mechanic Avenue from Van Dyke Street to North Hazel Street. Ward 7 599072 - Both sides East Fourth Street from North Howard Street to North McKnight xoad. 599073 - Both sides East Third Street from English Street to Clarence Street. q9-ry� *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$8:65 per £ront foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $10.38 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100% of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.87 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $5.23 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: l. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, � that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1998 Public Improvement Aid. 2 [c3 That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 9�" dav of June, 1999 5:30 o'clock P.M. in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas � Nays v'Benanav �lakey ,/Bostrom vColeman �Larris �Lantry V Reiter 1 In Favor Q Against Adopted by Council: Date�� Certified Passed by Council Secretary BY � � . �.. n Mayor CITY OF ST. PAUL FI23AL ORDER �irl£ y�11� 1� �/unc. 9, /��i9 COUNC FILE NO. qq� S�S By � �C� File No. 599069 - 599073 Voting Ward 6,7 In the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction at the £ollowing locations: Ward 6 S99069 - Both sides Ames Avenue from Van Dyke Street to North Hazel Street. �� S99070 - South side East Maryland Avenue from Hazelwood Street to Herbert Street at 1624 East Maryland Avenue Only. 599071 - Both sides Mechanic Avenue from Van Dyke Street to North Hazel Street. Ward 7 S99072 - Both sides East Fourth Street from North Howard Street to North McKnight Road. S�S99073 - Both sides East Third Street from English Street to Clarence Street. LA, a o� .� / J�,,,,% 2s qq-S45 *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$8.65 per front foot for a£ive (5) foot wide walk and $10.38 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100% of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.87 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $5.23 per square foot. under Preliminary order \� -^ �J�a approved q� , The Council of the City of Saint Pau1 has conducted a p lic hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has Pully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays �/ Benariav ✓ Blakey ✓ Bostrom ✓ Coleman � Harris r Lantry r/ Reiter 7 In Favor �Against Adopted by Council Certified Passed by B �Ga%`�/"!/� 1 Secretary Date /y y �� Mayor �1 c �6-�' � �� -l�� D PARTMENr/OFFI COUN L OAiEINfTIATED NO. � PublicWorksSidewalks 5-99 GREEN SHEET � CONTACT PERSON & PIiONE � DEPARTMINf OIflEGTOR ❑ CT' CAUNCIL Jerry Tvedt - 266-6087 ��+ crrv nrrovwer ❑ cm c�K NUMBERf-0R MUSTBEONCWNCILAGENDABY(DA7t� � � ft01lIING �g�p(E7DIflECTOR ❑FlN.&MGf.SERN R 7/{^�l� `�� ROEft �MAYOR(ORASSISTAtJT) 1❑ Cpf1I1C11 R8S28fCh OTALSOFSIGNATUREPAGES _(CLIPALLLOCATONSPoRSIGNANR� u ASSOCIATE u DEP ALACCOUNTANT fiEQUESTID Reconstruct Sidewalk & Widen Driveway Apron in Wards 6& 7(See attached list) �1►��5 5 — fYI RECAMMENDA'rIONS:Appruve(A)orReject(R) . PERSONAI.SEHVICECONIftACTSMUSTANSWERTHEFOLLOWINGQUESTIONS: PLANNINGCOMMISSION _CMLSERNCECOMMISSION �, HysMispersonlfirtneverwo`IcedunderacoMrac[forthisdeparVnern? deCOMMirrg YES NO — — 2. Has this person/firtn ever been a ciry empbyee? A srpFF _ YES NO DISIAICT COUNqL 3. Does ihis personffnm possess a siall not normally possessed by any wrrent ciry employee? — — YES NO SU�oFlrS wriiCH couNaL oa�ECiivE? F�cplain all yes answers on separaM sheet and attach to green sheet V INf�IATiNGPROBLEM,I UE.OPPORTUNffY(WHO, WHAT, WHEN, WHERE, WHY): , ' The problem "defective sidewalk" was caused by multiple problems, tree roots, poor subgrade,materials, freezefthaw cycles, service life limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a-cilywide basis and must be addressed and corrected annually. Left �ncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a siate where it would be unusabie and subject to increased pedesVian injuries from falls and possible litigations. ADVANTAGESIFAPPR�VEO: � - The community will benefit from this project because it will provide safe defect free sidewalks for its citizens. The sidewalk contracts are done by private contractors genetating private sector jobs as a result. , DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED: � Historicalry, the sidewalk reconstructions have cteated negative feedback because of construction procedures and assessments. Property.owners question the assessments, despite the fact thai up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized. Having to assess for walk reconstruction remains a controversial issue. � �..°. =T;�!,� ?':� . ... ., ., _. _�., �� a �i 3� w; e� DISADVAPfrAGES IF NOTAPPFOVED: This option wouid allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in tum, wiil generate more personal injury suits, resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in repairs and replacement, as well as claim payouts. OTAL AMOUNf OF TRANSACTION S � g.3�{H , 3L - COSTIREVENUE BUDGETED (CIRCLE ON� YES No FUNDINGSOURCE 94 `.'M^Q6.��. a� P('A �9 = F)3� AqTViTYNUMeER C99-21752-0784-00000 flNANCIALINFORMAiION:(IXPLAIN) B AST pp � 3J, y OOO �� C�B� JJ ° SQp�O . , . �19 -s N S SUNIMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMII�NDATIONS r.... ♦ I' � r� a � PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. AMES AVE. from Van Dyke St. to N. Hazel St. INITIATING ACITON: This order was initiated by the D'uector of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, water pockets, asphalt patches, disintegrated, scaled, setded and cracked panels. PRO.TECT: WIDEN DRIVEWAY APRON S.S. E. MARYI,AND AVE. from Hazelwood St. to Herbert St. at 1624 E. Maryland Ave. Only. IIVITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This project consists of widening the driveway apron on both sides for Fire Station #9 for easier fire vehicle maneuverability. � PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. MECHANIC AVE. from Van Dyke St. to N. Aazel St. �� r IIVITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public � necessity on the basis of two (2) complaints, a petition with one (1) signer and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, water pockets, settled and cracked panels. q9-�� SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOlVIl1�NDATIONS Wazd 7 PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. E. FOURTH ST. from N. Howazd St. to N. McKnight Rd. 5 i� IriITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of a petition with one (1) signer and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, disintegrated,scaled and cracked panels. PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT STDEWALK B.S. E. THII2D ST. from English St. to Clarence St. 5� IIVITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of five (5) complaints and an inspection of the wa1k. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, scaled, settled and cracked panels. atq- 5y � CITY OF ST. PAUL PRELIMINARY ORDER COUNC FI E NO. �0. � J`p. a0 By C� Fil 99069 - S99073 Voting Ward_ 6,7 In the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction at the following locations: Ward 6 599069 - Both sides Ames Avenue from Van Dyke Street to North Hazel Street. 599070 - South side East Maryland Avenue from Hazelwood Street to Herbert at 1624 East Maryland Avenue Only. S99071 - Both sides Mechanic Avenue from Van Dyke Street to North Hazel Street. Ward 7 599072 - Both sides East Fourth Street from North Howard Street to North McKnight xoad. 599073 - Both sides East Third Street from English Street to Clarence Street. q9-ry� *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$8:65 per £ront foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $10.38 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100% of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.87 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $5.23 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: l. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, � that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1998 Public Improvement Aid. 2 [c3 That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 9�" dav of June, 1999 5:30 o'clock P.M. in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas � Nays v'Benanav �lakey ,/Bostrom vColeman �Larris �Lantry V Reiter 1 In Favor Q Against Adopted by Council: Date�� Certified Passed by Council Secretary BY � � . �.. n Mayor CITY OF ST. PAUL FI23AL ORDER �irl£ y�11� 1� �/unc. 9, /��i9 COUNC FILE NO. qq� S�S By � �C� File No. 599069 - 599073 Voting Ward 6,7 In the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction at the £ollowing locations: Ward 6 S99069 - Both sides Ames Avenue from Van Dyke Street to North Hazel Street. �� S99070 - South side East Maryland Avenue from Hazelwood Street to Herbert Street at 1624 East Maryland Avenue Only. 599071 - Both sides Mechanic Avenue from Van Dyke Street to North Hazel Street. Ward 7 S99072 - Both sides East Fourth Street from North Howard Street to North McKnight Road. S�S99073 - Both sides East Third Street from English Street to Clarence Street. LA, a o� .� / J�,,,,% 2s qq-S45 *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$8.65 per front foot for a£ive (5) foot wide walk and $10.38 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100% of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.87 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $5.23 per square foot. under Preliminary order \� -^ �J�a approved q� , The Council of the City of Saint Pau1 has conducted a p lic hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has Pully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays �/ Benariav ✓ Blakey ✓ Bostrom ✓ Coleman � Harris r Lantry r/ Reiter 7 In Favor �Against Adopted by Council Certified Passed by B �Ga%`�/"!/� 1 Secretary Date /y y �� Mayor �1 c �6-�' � �� -l�� D PARTMENr/OFFI COUN L OAiEINfTIATED NO. � PublicWorksSidewalks 5-99 GREEN SHEET � CONTACT PERSON & PIiONE � DEPARTMINf OIflEGTOR ❑ CT' CAUNCIL Jerry Tvedt - 266-6087 ��+ crrv nrrovwer ❑ cm c�K NUMBERf-0R MUSTBEONCWNCILAGENDABY(DA7t� � � ft01lIING �g�p(E7DIflECTOR ❑FlN.&MGf.SERN R 7/{^�l� `�� ROEft �MAYOR(ORASSISTAtJT) 1❑ Cpf1I1C11 R8S28fCh OTALSOFSIGNATUREPAGES _(CLIPALLLOCATONSPoRSIGNANR� u ASSOCIATE u DEP ALACCOUNTANT fiEQUESTID Reconstruct Sidewalk & Widen Driveway Apron in Wards 6& 7(See attached list) �1►��5 5 — fYI RECAMMENDA'rIONS:Appruve(A)orReject(R) . PERSONAI.SEHVICECONIftACTSMUSTANSWERTHEFOLLOWINGQUESTIONS: PLANNINGCOMMISSION _CMLSERNCECOMMISSION �, HysMispersonlfirtneverwo`IcedunderacoMrac[forthisdeparVnern? deCOMMirrg YES NO — — 2. Has this person/firtn ever been a ciry empbyee? A srpFF _ YES NO DISIAICT COUNqL 3. Does ihis personffnm possess a siall not normally possessed by any wrrent ciry employee? — — YES NO SU�oFlrS wriiCH couNaL oa�ECiivE? F�cplain all yes answers on separaM sheet and attach to green sheet V INf�IATiNGPROBLEM,I UE.OPPORTUNffY(WHO, WHAT, WHEN, WHERE, WHY): , ' The problem "defective sidewalk" was caused by multiple problems, tree roots, poor subgrade,materials, freezefthaw cycles, service life limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a-cilywide basis and must be addressed and corrected annually. Left �ncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a siate where it would be unusabie and subject to increased pedesVian injuries from falls and possible litigations. ADVANTAGESIFAPPR�VEO: � - The community will benefit from this project because it will provide safe defect free sidewalks for its citizens. The sidewalk contracts are done by private contractors genetating private sector jobs as a result. , DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED: � Historicalry, the sidewalk reconstructions have cteated negative feedback because of construction procedures and assessments. Property.owners question the assessments, despite the fact thai up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized. Having to assess for walk reconstruction remains a controversial issue. � �..°. =T;�!,� ?':� . ... ., ., _. _�., �� a �i 3� w; e� DISADVAPfrAGES IF NOTAPPFOVED: This option wouid allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in tum, wiil generate more personal injury suits, resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in repairs and replacement, as well as claim payouts. OTAL AMOUNf OF TRANSACTION S � g.3�{H , 3L - COSTIREVENUE BUDGETED (CIRCLE ON� YES No FUNDINGSOURCE 94 `.'M^Q6.��. a� P('A �9 = F)3� AqTViTYNUMeER C99-21752-0784-00000 flNANCIALINFORMAiION:(IXPLAIN) B AST pp � 3J, y OOO �� C�B� JJ ° SQp�O . , . �19 -s N S SUNIMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMII�NDATIONS r.... ♦ I' � r� a � PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. AMES AVE. from Van Dyke St. to N. Hazel St. INITIATING ACITON: This order was initiated by the D'uector of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, water pockets, asphalt patches, disintegrated, scaled, setded and cracked panels. PRO.TECT: WIDEN DRIVEWAY APRON S.S. E. MARYI,AND AVE. from Hazelwood St. to Herbert St. at 1624 E. Maryland Ave. Only. IIVITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This project consists of widening the driveway apron on both sides for Fire Station #9 for easier fire vehicle maneuverability. � PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. MECHANIC AVE. from Van Dyke St. to N. Aazel St. �� r IIVITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public � necessity on the basis of two (2) complaints, a petition with one (1) signer and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, water pockets, settled and cracked panels. q9-�� SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOlVIl1�NDATIONS Wazd 7 PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. E. FOURTH ST. from N. Howazd St. to N. McKnight Rd. 5 i� IriITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of a petition with one (1) signer and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, disintegrated,scaled and cracked panels. PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT STDEWALK B.S. E. THII2D ST. from English St. to Clarence St. 5� IIVITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of five (5) complaints and an inspection of the wa1k. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, scaled, settled and cracked panels. atq- 5y � CITY OF ST. PAUL PRELIMINARY ORDER COUNC FI E NO. �0. � J`p. a0 By C� Fil 99069 - S99073 Voting Ward_ 6,7 In the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction at the following locations: Ward 6 599069 - Both sides Ames Avenue from Van Dyke Street to North Hazel Street. 599070 - South side East Maryland Avenue from Hazelwood Street to Herbert at 1624 East Maryland Avenue Only. S99071 - Both sides Mechanic Avenue from Van Dyke Street to North Hazel Street. Ward 7 599072 - Both sides East Fourth Street from North Howard Street to North McKnight xoad. 599073 - Both sides East Third Street from English Street to Clarence Street. q9-ry� *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$8:65 per £ront foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $10.38 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100% of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.87 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $5.23 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: l. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, � that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1998 Public Improvement Aid. 2 [c3 That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 9�" dav of June, 1999 5:30 o'clock P.M. in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas � Nays v'Benanav �lakey ,/Bostrom vColeman �Larris �Lantry V Reiter 1 In Favor Q Against Adopted by Council: Date�� Certified Passed by Council Secretary BY � � . �.. n Mayor