Loading...
99-544/�i1�J� �0�� l/u��. 9 / / � -r'i CITY OF ST. PAUL COUNCIL.FILE N FINAL ORDER 0 R I G I N A L File (ivo._S/�9065 -�99068_ � Votir�g Warn� 2, 3, 1 � n !'1 In the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction at the £ollowing locations: Ward 2 � S99065 - Both sides Randolph Avenue from View Street to Bay Street. _ �/}i1! (�/�l,i �/� J u,✓e 23 Ward 3 S99066 - West side Davern Street from Norfolk Avenue to South 135 feet. S99067 - East side Edgcumbe Road from St. Paul Avenue to Field Avenue & West side Edgcumbe Road from Sheridan Avenue to North to Railroad tracks. Ward 4 599068 - West side North Hamline Avenue from Sherburne Avenue to Thomas Avenue. qq .S �'� *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$8.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $10.38 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. Al1 other widths will be prorated accordingly. Nem construction (where no walk existed) - 1000 of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.87 per square foot. Al1 corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the £irst 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family struCtures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $5.23 per square foot. under Preliminary order `� " 3� ` approved '� 1 The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a pub ic hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City o££icers shall calculate al1 expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays ✓ Benanav '� Blakey ✓ Bostrom ✓ Coleman � Harris ✓ Lantry ✓ Reiter �In Favor �Against Adopted by Council Certified Passed Date�l� q�.�y�y 1 Secretary Mayor � �19N`� Works Sidewalks TV2df-ZBG-BOH7 E ON GOUNdLAGENDA BV (DA'f� OFSGNATUqEPAGES _ WR ; �� �- llt-��( � GREEN SHEET No. nRn�? INfT1AUDATE INRIAUDATE _ DEPAFTIMIENT DIpECTOR CITY AITOANE'! &lIX'iETDIREGTOR MAYOR (OR ASSISTANT) ❑CYII'CAUNCIL r/� ❑ Cm CLERx _ ❑ FlN. & MGT. SEfiVICES DIR Q Gouncil Res� (IXJPALLIACAiIONSFOR51GNA7UAB � � ASSOCIAiE Reco�struct 8� Construct Sidewalk in Wards 2, 3 8, 4(See attached list) COMMITfEE _DISTRICTCOUNQL � PERSONAL SERVICE CONfRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING OUESTIONS: CMLSEAVICECOMMISSION 7, HasihispersoNfirtneverworkedurWeracoMraclforNisdeparlmeM? YES NO � 2. Fias this person/firtn ever been a ciry employee? , YES NO 3. Do� tlns personffirtn possess a sldl� not normaNy possessed by anY curtent city employeeT YES NO Explain a�l yes answers on uparate sheet and attaeh to green sheet The problem °defective sidewalk" was caused by multiple problems, tree roots, poor subgrade materials, freezefthaw cycles, service life limits, chemical additives, e�ctreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and corrected annually. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be unusable and subject to increased pedesVian injuries from falls and possible litigations. The community will benefit from this project because it will provide safe defect free sidewalks for its citizens. The sidewalk contracts are done by private cortractors generating private sector jobs as a resutt. IPAPPROVEU Hisiorically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative Eeedback because of construction procedures arxi assessments. Property owners question the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized. Having to assess for walk reconstYUCtion remains a controversial issue. IF NOT APPRpVEp: This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in tum, will generate more personal injury sufts, resutting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in repairs and replacement, as well as claim payouts. AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION $ (] � ���bN a �3 .��' F'Se5 . �F � � � Q�� `� '� ���� 'ENUE BUDGETED (CIRCLE ONE) YES No NUM6ER C99-2T752-0784-00��0 INFOflMAiION: (EXPLAIN) �`.� A.S�T � 351 c; c rs 99 = 5a q9 -S 44 SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECONIMENDATION `1d��► PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. RANDOLPH AVE. from View St. to Bay St. �� INITTATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of two (2) complaints and an inspection of the walk. This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, settled and cracked panels. q9 -s �ty SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECONIlVIENDATIONS Wazd 3 PROTECT: CONSTRUCT SIDEWALK W.S. DAVERN ST. from Norfolk Ave. to S. 135'. � (V f INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the Highland District ��� Council. This walk is fust time. .................................................................................................. PROTECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK E.S. EDGCUMBE RD. from St. Paul Ave. to Field Ave. & W.S. EDGCUMBE RD. from Sheridan Ave. to N. to Railroad Tracks. ��� IlvITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of five (5) complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDTI'IONS: This walk is poured concrete with cracked panels. ......................................................................................................... SiJMNIARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENAATION q,q -s �l �t VJazd 4 PROTECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK W.S. N. HAMI.INE AVE. from Sherburne Ave. to Thomas Ave. �/ 1!�/� I1�IITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the D'uector of Public Works as public necessiry on the basis of of one (1) complaint and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, scaled, settled and cracked panels. ......................................................................................................... CITY OF ST. PAUL PRELIMINARY ORDER ORIGINAL COUNCIL FILE N0. By File o. S 906 Voting Ward ,3,4 [:S3 In the Matter o£ sidewalk reconstruction at the folloming locations: Ward 2 S99065 - Both sides Randolph Avenue from View Street to Bay Street. qq S�y � /9 1_ 99 - Ward 3 599066 - West side Davern Street from Norfolk Avenue to South 135 feet. 599067 - East side Edgcumbe Road from St. Paul Avenue to Field Avenue & west side Edgcumbe Road from Sheridan Avenue to Railroad tracks. Ward 4 599068 - West side North Hamline Avenue from Sherburne Avenue to Thomas Avenue. /�i1�J� �0�� l/u��. 9 / / � -r'i CITY OF ST. PAUL COUNCIL.FILE N FINAL ORDER 0 R I G I N A L File (ivo._S/�9065 -�99068_ � Votir�g Warn� 2, 3, 1 � n !'1 In the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction at the £ollowing locations: Ward 2 � S99065 - Both sides Randolph Avenue from View Street to Bay Street. _ �/}i1! (�/�l,i �/� J u,✓e 23 Ward 3 S99066 - West side Davern Street from Norfolk Avenue to South 135 feet. S99067 - East side Edgcumbe Road from St. Paul Avenue to Field Avenue & West side Edgcumbe Road from Sheridan Avenue to North to Railroad tracks. Ward 4 599068 - West side North Hamline Avenue from Sherburne Avenue to Thomas Avenue. qq .S �'� *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$8.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $10.38 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. Al1 other widths will be prorated accordingly. Nem construction (where no walk existed) - 1000 of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.87 per square foot. Al1 corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the £irst 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family struCtures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $5.23 per square foot. under Preliminary order `� " 3� ` approved '� 1 The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a pub ic hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City o££icers shall calculate al1 expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays ✓ Benanav '� Blakey ✓ Bostrom ✓ Coleman � Harris ✓ Lantry ✓ Reiter �In Favor �Against Adopted by Council Certified Passed Date�l� q�.�y�y 1 Secretary Mayor � �19N`� Works Sidewalks TV2df-ZBG-BOH7 E ON GOUNdLAGENDA BV (DA'f� OFSGNATUqEPAGES _ WR ; �� �- llt-��( � GREEN SHEET No. nRn�? INfT1AUDATE INRIAUDATE _ DEPAFTIMIENT DIpECTOR CITY AITOANE'! &lIX'iETDIREGTOR MAYOR (OR ASSISTANT) ❑CYII'CAUNCIL r/� ❑ Cm CLERx _ ❑ FlN. & MGT. SEfiVICES DIR Q Gouncil Res� (IXJPALLIACAiIONSFOR51GNA7UAB � � ASSOCIAiE Reco�struct 8� Construct Sidewalk in Wards 2, 3 8, 4(See attached list) COMMITfEE _DISTRICTCOUNQL � PERSONAL SERVICE CONfRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING OUESTIONS: CMLSEAVICECOMMISSION 7, HasihispersoNfirtneverworkedurWeracoMraclforNisdeparlmeM? YES NO � 2. Fias this person/firtn ever been a ciry employee? , YES NO 3. Do� tlns personffirtn possess a sldl� not normaNy possessed by anY curtent city employeeT YES NO Explain a�l yes answers on uparate sheet and attaeh to green sheet The problem °defective sidewalk" was caused by multiple problems, tree roots, poor subgrade materials, freezefthaw cycles, service life limits, chemical additives, e�ctreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and corrected annually. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be unusable and subject to increased pedesVian injuries from falls and possible litigations. The community will benefit from this project because it will provide safe defect free sidewalks for its citizens. The sidewalk contracts are done by private cortractors generating private sector jobs as a resutt. IPAPPROVEU Hisiorically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative Eeedback because of construction procedures arxi assessments. Property owners question the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized. Having to assess for walk reconstYUCtion remains a controversial issue. IF NOT APPRpVEp: This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in tum, will generate more personal injury sufts, resutting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in repairs and replacement, as well as claim payouts. AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION $ (] � ���bN a �3 .��' F'Se5 . �F � � � Q�� `� '� ���� 'ENUE BUDGETED (CIRCLE ONE) YES No NUM6ER C99-2T752-0784-00��0 INFOflMAiION: (EXPLAIN) �`.� A.S�T � 351 c; c rs 99 = 5a q9 -S 44 SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECONIMENDATION `1d��► PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. RANDOLPH AVE. from View St. to Bay St. �� INITTATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of two (2) complaints and an inspection of the walk. This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, settled and cracked panels. q9 -s �ty SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECONIlVIENDATIONS Wazd 3 PROTECT: CONSTRUCT SIDEWALK W.S. DAVERN ST. from Norfolk Ave. to S. 135'. � (V f INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the Highland District ��� Council. This walk is fust time. .................................................................................................. PROTECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK E.S. EDGCUMBE RD. from St. Paul Ave. to Field Ave. & W.S. EDGCUMBE RD. from Sheridan Ave. to N. to Railroad Tracks. ��� IlvITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of five (5) complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDTI'IONS: This walk is poured concrete with cracked panels. ......................................................................................................... SiJMNIARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENAATION q,q -s �l �t VJazd 4 PROTECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK W.S. N. HAMI.INE AVE. from Sherburne Ave. to Thomas Ave. �/ 1!�/� I1�IITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the D'uector of Public Works as public necessiry on the basis of of one (1) complaint and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, scaled, settled and cracked panels. ......................................................................................................... CITY OF ST. PAUL PRELIMINARY ORDER ORIGINAL COUNCIL FILE N0. By File o. S 906 Voting Ward ,3,4 [:S3 In the Matter o£ sidewalk reconstruction at the folloming locations: Ward 2 S99065 - Both sides Randolph Avenue from View Street to Bay Street. qq S�y � /9 1_ 99 - Ward 3 599066 - West side Davern Street from Norfolk Avenue to South 135 feet. 599067 - East side Edgcumbe Road from St. Paul Avenue to Field Avenue & west side Edgcumbe Road from Sheridan Avenue to Railroad tracks. Ward 4 599068 - West side North Hamline Avenue from Sherburne Avenue to Thomas Avenue. /�i1�J� �0�� l/u��. 9 / / � -r'i CITY OF ST. PAUL COUNCIL.FILE N FINAL ORDER 0 R I G I N A L File (ivo._S/�9065 -�99068_ � Votir�g Warn� 2, 3, 1 � n !'1 In the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction at the £ollowing locations: Ward 2 � S99065 - Both sides Randolph Avenue from View Street to Bay Street. _ �/}i1! (�/�l,i �/� J u,✓e 23 Ward 3 S99066 - West side Davern Street from Norfolk Avenue to South 135 feet. S99067 - East side Edgcumbe Road from St. Paul Avenue to Field Avenue & West side Edgcumbe Road from Sheridan Avenue to North to Railroad tracks. Ward 4 599068 - West side North Hamline Avenue from Sherburne Avenue to Thomas Avenue. qq .S �'� *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$8.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $10.38 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. Al1 other widths will be prorated accordingly. Nem construction (where no walk existed) - 1000 of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.87 per square foot. Al1 corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the £irst 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family struCtures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $5.23 per square foot. under Preliminary order `� " 3� ` approved '� 1 The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a pub ic hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City o££icers shall calculate al1 expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays ✓ Benanav '� Blakey ✓ Bostrom ✓ Coleman � Harris ✓ Lantry ✓ Reiter �In Favor �Against Adopted by Council Certified Passed Date�l� q�.�y�y 1 Secretary Mayor � �19N`� Works Sidewalks TV2df-ZBG-BOH7 E ON GOUNdLAGENDA BV (DA'f� OFSGNATUqEPAGES _ WR ; �� �- llt-��( � GREEN SHEET No. nRn�? INfT1AUDATE INRIAUDATE _ DEPAFTIMIENT DIpECTOR CITY AITOANE'! &lIX'iETDIREGTOR MAYOR (OR ASSISTANT) ❑CYII'CAUNCIL r/� ❑ Cm CLERx _ ❑ FlN. & MGT. SEfiVICES DIR Q Gouncil Res� (IXJPALLIACAiIONSFOR51GNA7UAB � � ASSOCIAiE Reco�struct 8� Construct Sidewalk in Wards 2, 3 8, 4(See attached list) COMMITfEE _DISTRICTCOUNQL � PERSONAL SERVICE CONfRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING OUESTIONS: CMLSEAVICECOMMISSION 7, HasihispersoNfirtneverworkedurWeracoMraclforNisdeparlmeM? YES NO � 2. Fias this person/firtn ever been a ciry employee? , YES NO 3. Do� tlns personffirtn possess a sldl� not normaNy possessed by anY curtent city employeeT YES NO Explain a�l yes answers on uparate sheet and attaeh to green sheet The problem °defective sidewalk" was caused by multiple problems, tree roots, poor subgrade materials, freezefthaw cycles, service life limits, chemical additives, e�ctreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and corrected annually. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be unusable and subject to increased pedesVian injuries from falls and possible litigations. The community will benefit from this project because it will provide safe defect free sidewalks for its citizens. The sidewalk contracts are done by private cortractors generating private sector jobs as a resutt. IPAPPROVEU Hisiorically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative Eeedback because of construction procedures arxi assessments. Property owners question the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized. Having to assess for walk reconstYUCtion remains a controversial issue. IF NOT APPRpVEp: This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in tum, will generate more personal injury sufts, resutting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in repairs and replacement, as well as claim payouts. AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION $ (] � ���bN a �3 .��' F'Se5 . �F � � � Q�� `� '� ���� 'ENUE BUDGETED (CIRCLE ONE) YES No NUM6ER C99-2T752-0784-00��0 INFOflMAiION: (EXPLAIN) �`.� A.S�T � 351 c; c rs 99 = 5a q9 -S 44 SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECONIMENDATION `1d��► PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. RANDOLPH AVE. from View St. to Bay St. �� INITTATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of two (2) complaints and an inspection of the walk. This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, settled and cracked panels. q9 -s �ty SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECONIlVIENDATIONS Wazd 3 PROTECT: CONSTRUCT SIDEWALK W.S. DAVERN ST. from Norfolk Ave. to S. 135'. � (V f INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the Highland District ��� Council. This walk is fust time. .................................................................................................. PROTECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK E.S. EDGCUMBE RD. from St. Paul Ave. to Field Ave. & W.S. EDGCUMBE RD. from Sheridan Ave. to N. to Railroad Tracks. ��� IlvITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of five (5) complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDTI'IONS: This walk is poured concrete with cracked panels. ......................................................................................................... SiJMNIARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENAATION q,q -s �l �t VJazd 4 PROTECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK W.S. N. HAMI.INE AVE. from Sherburne Ave. to Thomas Ave. �/ 1!�/� I1�IITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the D'uector of Public Works as public necessiry on the basis of of one (1) complaint and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, scaled, settled and cracked panels. ......................................................................................................... CITY OF ST. PAUL PRELIMINARY ORDER ORIGINAL COUNCIL FILE N0. By File o. S 906 Voting Ward ,3,4 [:S3 In the Matter o£ sidewalk reconstruction at the folloming locations: Ward 2 S99065 - Both sides Randolph Avenue from View Street to Bay Street. qq S�y � /9 1_ 99 - Ward 3 599066 - West side Davern Street from Norfolk Avenue to South 135 feet. 599067 - East side Edgcumbe Road from St. Paul Avenue to Field Avenue & west side Edgcumbe Road from Sheridan Avenue to Railroad tracks. Ward 4 599068 - West side North Hamline Avenue from Sherburne Avenue to Thomas Avenue.