The URL can be used to link to this page

99-543' l�i��,✓��b—��..�� 9, i�qs CITY OF ST. PAUL COUNCIL FILE N0. 1l � � FINAI, ORDER By �� Ei1e o. S O55 - S 064 vot:ng War 1 In the Matter o£ sidesvalk reconstruction at the £ollowing locations: S99055 - Both sides Edmund Avenue £rom Arundel Street to North Western Avenue. 599056 - Both sides Elfelt Street from Charles Avenue to Thomas Avenue. 599057 - Both sides Elfelt Street from Thomas Avenue to Como Avenue. S99058 - Both sides North 6riggs Street from La£ond Avenue to Blair Avenue & East side North Griggs Street from Thomas Avenue to Lafond Avenue. S99059 - East side North Hamline Avenue from Sherburne Avenue to Thomas Avenue. S99060 - Both sides Lafond Avenue from Farrington Street to Elfelt Street. S99061 - Both sides North Syndicate Street from Edmund Avenue to Thomas Avenue. 599062 - Both sides North Syndicate Street from Lafond Avenue to Blair Avenue. 599063 - Both sides North Syndicate Street from West Minnehaha Avenue to Seminary Avenue. �A.o �599064 - Both sides Thomas Avenue from Arundel Street to North Western Avenue �� u�G �3 q9 -SU3 *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement o£ old sidewalk) -$8.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $10.38 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. Al1 other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100$ of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.87 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet o£ new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (MOre than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100% of actual cost estimated to be approximately $5.23 per square foot. under Preliminary order �q — �-{ \'� approved The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a pub ic hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and rias fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays r/ Benanav ✓ Blakey ✓ Bostrom ✓ Coleman ✓ Harris i Lantry ,/ Reiter 21n Favor �Against Adopted by Council: Certified�Passed � Date� Secretary � PG$uL ii�Rll1�6-�vilA� `� I�R9 � ��- �l�-a� 9q-s43 DEPARTMENT/OFFlCE/COUNQL DAiE INR1AiED PublicWorksSidewalks s-ss GREEN SHEET No. �956— INRIAIJDATE �NITIAIJDATE CANTACTPERSON&PHONE aDFPARTMFMDIFiEVTOR ❑CfiYCAUNCIL erty Tvedt - 26E6087 �+ � cmarrawEV ❑ crzrc�mK NU/ABEA WR MUSTBEONCOUNCILAGENDABY(DATE7 ��l[ � nlD ROVfQiG O I� L 5 r vn OfiDEfl 6UOGET OIRECCOR ❑ F4N. &fAGT. SERVICES O1R G �A��Q aMAYOR(ORASSISTAM) �❑Cp{1fIC,1� Research !Y � ALiOF51GNATUREPAGES (CLJPALLLOCA7IONSPoRSIGNAlUR� u AS50('.IATE u DEP ACCOUNTANT N flEQUE51ED � � Reconstruct Sidewalk in Ward 1(See attached list) FIi��F� -5 fl aECOMra�oanoNS: nppmve (A) w Re�ecc (R) pEqgpNAL S�RVICE COMRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING �UEST70NS: PIJWNINGCOMMISSION _GVILSEAVICECAMMISSION �. �ry�isperson/firtneverworkedunderacontractfor7hisdepartmenC? CIBCOMMIttEE YES NO — — 2. Has this persoNFirtn ever been a city employee? A SrqFF — YES NO D151Ri�T ��UN�i� 3. Does this person/firtn possess a ski�l not normaly possessed by any cuRent dty employee7 — — YES NO SUPPorxiS wHICH CAUNCIL oBJECnVE? Explain all yes answers on separate sheet antl attach to green sheet I 8 M, I$$UE.OPPORRINITY(WMO, WHAT, WHEN, WHERE, WH1�: The problem "defective sidewalk" was caused by multiple problems, tree roots, poor subgrade materials, freezetthaw cycles, service life limits, chemicaf additives, extseme temperature varia£wns, etc. These problems occur o� a citywide basis and must be addressed and corrected annually. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations. ADVANTAGES IF APPFSOVED: The community will benefit from this project because it will provide safe defect free sidewalks for its citizens. The sidewalk contracts are done by private contractors generating private sector jobs as a result. DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED: Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback because of construction procedures and assessments. Properry owners question the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized. Having to assess for walk reconstruction remains a controversial issue. DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPPWED: This option would aliow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in tum, will generate more personal injury suits, resufting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in repairs and replacement, as well as claim payouts. �v.z$g.°�',� ��wnsr�,h �;��$�'f H?�� - � f �� TOTALAMOUNTOPTRANSACTION$ � SJ COST/FiEVENUEBUDGETED(CIHCLEONE) YES No FUNDINGSOURCE 99'�MC�E169 /�., P�'/� ]9 = 63(3,O�o6 pCRV1TYNUMeER C994T752-0784-00000 FINANqALINFORMATION:(IXPWN) B' AST = 357 �QQ� C t C PB 9`3 = 5�;�00 �q Sy 3 SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMNIENDATIONS Ward 1 `/ � �� PROTECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. EDMLTND AVE. from Arundel St. to N. Westem Ave. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of four (4) complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, water pockets, asphalt patches, scaled, settled and cracked panels. PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. ELFELT ST. from Chazles Ave. to Thomas Ave. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of an inspection of the walk. EXTSTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, settled and cracked panels. ......................................................•---............................................... PROTECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. ELFELT ST. from Thomas Ave. to Como Ave. 5��j� INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public �� necessity on the basis of four (4) complaints and an inspection of the wa1k. EXIS1'ING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, water pockets, asphalt patches, scaled, settled and cracked panels. i�) ,� i PROTECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. N. GRIGGS ST. from Lafond Ave. to Blair Ave. & E.S. N. GRIGGS ST. from Thomas Ave. to Lafond Ave_ IIVITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Duector of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of of an inspection of the walk. qq_sy� -2- This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, settled and cracked panels. ................................... PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK E.S. N. HAMLINE AVE. from Sherburne Ave. to Thomas Ave. ��/► ,� IIVITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the D'uector of Public Works as public �� necessity on the basis of four (4) complaints and an inspection of the walk. This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, Cl � disintegrated, scaled, settled and cracked panels. PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. LAFOND AVE. from Farrington St. to Elfelt St. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the D'uector of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, scaled and settled panels. .................................................... �� PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. N. SYNDICATE ST. from Edmund Ave. to Thomas Ave. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint and an inspection of the walk. This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, settied and cracked panels. PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. N. SYNDICATE ST. from Lafond Ave. to �� t � Blair Ave. V I1vITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Duector of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of an inspection of the walk. c� q -.S4 3 -3- 59�q43 i,� EXISTIlVG CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches and scaled panels. PROJECT: RECONSI`I2UCT SIDEWALK B.S. N. 5YNDICATE ST. from W. Minnehaha Ave. to Seminary Ave. IriITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of five (5) complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, settled and cracked panels. PRO.iECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. THOMAS AVE. from Arundel St. to N. Western Ave. INITIATII�TG ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of two (2) complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, water pockets, asphalt patches, disintegrated, scaled, settled and cracked panels. V CITY OF ST. PAUL PRELIMINARY ORDER COUNCIL By File o._59 Voting Ward No. °19-'�l3 � ^. 5 - 5990 4 1 In the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction at the following locations: �� qq _Sy3 599055 - Both sides Edmund Avenue from Arundel Street to North Western Avenue. 599056 - Both sides Elfelt Street from Charles Avenue to Thomas Avenue. S99057 - Both sides Elfelt Street from Thomas Avenue to Como Avenue S99�58 - Both sides North Griggs Street from Lafond Avenue to Blair Avenue & East side North Griggs Street from Thomas Avenue to Lafond Avenue. S99059 - East side North Hamline Avenue from Sherburne Avenue to Thomas Avenue. 599060 - Both sides Lafond Avenue from Farrington Street to Elfelt Street. 599061 - Both sides North Syndicate Street from Edmund Avenue to Thomas Avenue. S99062 - Both sides North Syndicate Street from Lafond Avenue to Blair Avenue. S99063 - Both sides North Syndicate Street from West Minnehaha Avenue to Seminary Avenue. S99064 - Both sides Thomas Avenue from Arundel Street to North Western Avenue. qq •yt3 �q.54 *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) - 58.65 per front foot Por a £ive (5) foot wide walk and $10.38 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 1000 of the actual cost estimated to be approximately 53.87 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100% of actual cost estimated to be approximately $5.23 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, c� that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1998 Public Improvement Aid. 2 3 That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 9`" dav of June, 1999 5: 3� o' clock P.M. in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas / Nays t�� enanav ✓ Blakey Bostrom` IaW3�,,,Y Co 1 eman - �y c.�� Harris � {ah ✓Lantry ✓�eiter y In Favor � Against 3 AbS�.-� Adopted by Council: Date 1 �`� '� Certified Passed by Council Secretary BY �'� '-°_� �l' -_ � m-�.� - L \ Mayor ' l�i��,✓��b—��..�� 9, i�qs CITY OF ST. PAUL COUNCIL FILE N0. 1l � � FINAI, ORDER By �� Ei1e o. S O55 - S 064 vot:ng War 1 In the Matter o£ sidesvalk reconstruction at the £ollowing locations: S99055 - Both sides Edmund Avenue £rom Arundel Street to North Western Avenue. 599056 - Both sides Elfelt Street from Charles Avenue to Thomas Avenue. 599057 - Both sides Elfelt Street from Thomas Avenue to Como Avenue. S99058 - Both sides North 6riggs Street from La£ond Avenue to Blair Avenue & East side North Griggs Street from Thomas Avenue to Lafond Avenue. S99059 - East side North Hamline Avenue from Sherburne Avenue to Thomas Avenue. S99060 - Both sides Lafond Avenue from Farrington Street to Elfelt Street. S99061 - Both sides North Syndicate Street from Edmund Avenue to Thomas Avenue. 599062 - Both sides North Syndicate Street from Lafond Avenue to Blair Avenue. 599063 - Both sides North Syndicate Street from West Minnehaha Avenue to Seminary Avenue. �A.o �599064 - Both sides Thomas Avenue from Arundel Street to North Western Avenue �� u�G �3 q9 -SU3 *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement o£ old sidewalk) -$8.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $10.38 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. Al1 other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100$ of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.87 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet o£ new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (MOre than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100% of actual cost estimated to be approximately $5.23 per square foot. under Preliminary order �q — �-{ \'� approved The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a pub ic hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and rias fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays r/ Benanav ✓ Blakey ✓ Bostrom ✓ Coleman ✓ Harris i Lantry ,/ Reiter 21n Favor �Against Adopted by Council: Certified�Passed � Date� Secretary � PG$uL ii�Rll1�6-�vilA� `� I�R9 � ��- �l�-a� 9q-s43 DEPARTMENT/OFFlCE/COUNQL DAiE INR1AiED PublicWorksSidewalks s-ss GREEN SHEET No. �956— INRIAIJDATE �NITIAIJDATE CANTACTPERSON&PHONE aDFPARTMFMDIFiEVTOR ❑CfiYCAUNCIL erty Tvedt - 26E6087 �+ � cmarrawEV ❑ crzrc�mK NU/ABEA WR MUSTBEONCOUNCILAGENDABY(DATE7 ��l[ � nlD ROVfQiG O I� L 5 r vn OfiDEfl 6UOGET OIRECCOR ❑ F4N. &fAGT. SERVICES O1R G �A��Q aMAYOR(ORASSISTAM) �❑Cp{1fIC,1� Research !Y � ALiOF51GNATUREPAGES (CLJPALLLOCA7IONSPoRSIGNAlUR� u AS50('.IATE u DEP ACCOUNTANT N flEQUE51ED � � Reconstruct Sidewalk in Ward 1(See attached list) FIi��F� -5 fl aECOMra�oanoNS: nppmve (A) w Re�ecc (R) pEqgpNAL S�RVICE COMRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING �UEST70NS: PIJWNINGCOMMISSION _GVILSEAVICECAMMISSION �. �ry�isperson/firtneverworkedunderacontractfor7hisdepartmenC? CIBCOMMIttEE YES NO — — 2. Has this persoNFirtn ever been a city employee? A SrqFF — YES NO D151Ri�T ��UN�i� 3. Does this person/firtn possess a ski�l not normaly possessed by any cuRent dty employee7 — — YES NO SUPPorxiS wHICH CAUNCIL oBJECnVE? Explain all yes answers on separate sheet antl attach to green sheet I 8 M, I$$UE.OPPORRINITY(WMO, WHAT, WHEN, WHERE, WH1�: The problem "defective sidewalk" was caused by multiple problems, tree roots, poor subgrade materials, freezetthaw cycles, service life limits, chemicaf additives, extseme temperature varia£wns, etc. These problems occur o� a citywide basis and must be addressed and corrected annually. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations. ADVANTAGES IF APPFSOVED: The community will benefit from this project because it will provide safe defect free sidewalks for its citizens. The sidewalk contracts are done by private contractors generating private sector jobs as a result. DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED: Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback because of construction procedures and assessments. Properry owners question the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized. Having to assess for walk reconstruction remains a controversial issue. DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPPWED: This option would aliow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in tum, will generate more personal injury suits, resufting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in repairs and replacement, as well as claim payouts. �v.z$g.°�',� ��wnsr�,h �;��$�'f H?�� - � f �� TOTALAMOUNTOPTRANSACTION$ � SJ COST/FiEVENUEBUDGETED(CIHCLEONE) YES No FUNDINGSOURCE 99'�MC�E169 /�., P�'/� ]9 = 63(3,O�o6 pCRV1TYNUMeER C994T752-0784-00000 FINANqALINFORMATION:(IXPWN) B' AST = 357 �QQ� C t C PB 9`3 = 5�;�00 �q Sy 3 SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMNIENDATIONS Ward 1 `/ � �� PROTECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. EDMLTND AVE. from Arundel St. to N. Westem Ave. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of four (4) complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, water pockets, asphalt patches, scaled, settled and cracked panels. PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. ELFELT ST. from Chazles Ave. to Thomas Ave. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of an inspection of the walk. EXTSTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, settled and cracked panels. ......................................................•---............................................... PROTECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. ELFELT ST. from Thomas Ave. to Como Ave. 5��j� INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public �� necessity on the basis of four (4) complaints and an inspection of the wa1k. EXIS1'ING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, water pockets, asphalt patches, scaled, settled and cracked panels. i�) ,� i PROTECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. N. GRIGGS ST. from Lafond Ave. to Blair Ave. & E.S. N. GRIGGS ST. from Thomas Ave. to Lafond Ave_ IIVITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Duector of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of of an inspection of the walk. qq_sy� -2- This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, settled and cracked panels. ................................... PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK E.S. N. HAMLINE AVE. from Sherburne Ave. to Thomas Ave. ��/► ,� IIVITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the D'uector of Public Works as public �� necessity on the basis of four (4) complaints and an inspection of the walk. This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, Cl � disintegrated, scaled, settled and cracked panels. PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. LAFOND AVE. from Farrington St. to Elfelt St. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the D'uector of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, scaled and settled panels. .................................................... �� PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. N. SYNDICATE ST. from Edmund Ave. to Thomas Ave. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint and an inspection of the walk. This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, settied and cracked panels. PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. N. SYNDICATE ST. from Lafond Ave. to �� t � Blair Ave. V I1vITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Duector of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of an inspection of the walk. c� q -.S4 3 -3- 59�q43 i,� EXISTIlVG CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches and scaled panels. PROJECT: RECONSI`I2UCT SIDEWALK B.S. N. 5YNDICATE ST. from W. Minnehaha Ave. to Seminary Ave. IriITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of five (5) complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, settled and cracked panels. PRO.iECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. THOMAS AVE. from Arundel St. to N. Western Ave. INITIATII�TG ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of two (2) complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, water pockets, asphalt patches, disintegrated, scaled, settled and cracked panels. V CITY OF ST. PAUL PRELIMINARY ORDER COUNCIL By File o._59 Voting Ward No. °19-'�l3 � ^. 5 - 5990 4 1 In the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction at the following locations: �� qq _Sy3 599055 - Both sides Edmund Avenue from Arundel Street to North Western Avenue. 599056 - Both sides Elfelt Street from Charles Avenue to Thomas Avenue. S99057 - Both sides Elfelt Street from Thomas Avenue to Como Avenue S99�58 - Both sides North Griggs Street from Lafond Avenue to Blair Avenue & East side North Griggs Street from Thomas Avenue to Lafond Avenue. S99059 - East side North Hamline Avenue from Sherburne Avenue to Thomas Avenue. 599060 - Both sides Lafond Avenue from Farrington Street to Elfelt Street. 599061 - Both sides North Syndicate Street from Edmund Avenue to Thomas Avenue. S99062 - Both sides North Syndicate Street from Lafond Avenue to Blair Avenue. S99063 - Both sides North Syndicate Street from West Minnehaha Avenue to Seminary Avenue. S99064 - Both sides Thomas Avenue from Arundel Street to North Western Avenue. qq •yt3 �q.54 *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) - 58.65 per front foot Por a £ive (5) foot wide walk and $10.38 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 1000 of the actual cost estimated to be approximately 53.87 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100% of actual cost estimated to be approximately $5.23 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, c� that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1998 Public Improvement Aid. 2 3 That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 9`" dav of June, 1999 5: 3� o' clock P.M. in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas / Nays t�� enanav ✓ Blakey Bostrom` IaW3�,,,Y Co 1 eman - �y c.�� Harris � {ah ✓Lantry ✓�eiter y In Favor � Against 3 AbS�.-� Adopted by Council: Date 1 �`� '� Certified Passed by Council Secretary BY �'� '-°_� �l' -_ � m-�.� - L \ Mayor ' l�i��,✓��b—��..�� 9, i�qs CITY OF ST. PAUL COUNCIL FILE N0. 1l � � FINAI, ORDER By �� Ei1e o. S O55 - S 064 vot:ng War 1 In the Matter o£ sidesvalk reconstruction at the £ollowing locations: S99055 - Both sides Edmund Avenue £rom Arundel Street to North Western Avenue. 599056 - Both sides Elfelt Street from Charles Avenue to Thomas Avenue. 599057 - Both sides Elfelt Street from Thomas Avenue to Como Avenue. S99058 - Both sides North 6riggs Street from La£ond Avenue to Blair Avenue & East side North Griggs Street from Thomas Avenue to Lafond Avenue. S99059 - East side North Hamline Avenue from Sherburne Avenue to Thomas Avenue. S99060 - Both sides Lafond Avenue from Farrington Street to Elfelt Street. S99061 - Both sides North Syndicate Street from Edmund Avenue to Thomas Avenue. 599062 - Both sides North Syndicate Street from Lafond Avenue to Blair Avenue. 599063 - Both sides North Syndicate Street from West Minnehaha Avenue to Seminary Avenue. �A.o �599064 - Both sides Thomas Avenue from Arundel Street to North Western Avenue �� u�G �3 q9 -SU3 *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement o£ old sidewalk) -$8.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $10.38 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. Al1 other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100$ of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.87 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet o£ new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (MOre than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100% of actual cost estimated to be approximately $5.23 per square foot. under Preliminary order �q — �-{ \'� approved The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a pub ic hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and rias fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays r/ Benanav ✓ Blakey ✓ Bostrom ✓ Coleman ✓ Harris i Lantry ,/ Reiter 21n Favor �Against Adopted by Council: Certified�Passed � Date� Secretary � PG$uL ii�Rll1�6-�vilA� `� I�R9 � ��- �l�-a� 9q-s43 DEPARTMENT/OFFlCE/COUNQL DAiE INR1AiED PublicWorksSidewalks s-ss GREEN SHEET No. �956— INRIAIJDATE �NITIAIJDATE CANTACTPERSON&PHONE aDFPARTMFMDIFiEVTOR ❑CfiYCAUNCIL erty Tvedt - 26E6087 �+ � cmarrawEV ❑ crzrc�mK NU/ABEA WR MUSTBEONCOUNCILAGENDABY(DATE7 ��l[ � nlD ROVfQiG O I� L 5 r vn OfiDEfl 6UOGET OIRECCOR ❑ F4N. &fAGT. SERVICES O1R G �A��Q aMAYOR(ORASSISTAM) �❑Cp{1fIC,1� Research !Y � ALiOF51GNATUREPAGES (CLJPALLLOCA7IONSPoRSIGNAlUR� u AS50('.IATE u DEP ACCOUNTANT N flEQUE51ED � � Reconstruct Sidewalk in Ward 1(See attached list) FIi��F� -5 fl aECOMra�oanoNS: nppmve (A) w Re�ecc (R) pEqgpNAL S�RVICE COMRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING �UEST70NS: PIJWNINGCOMMISSION _GVILSEAVICECAMMISSION �. �ry�isperson/firtneverworkedunderacontractfor7hisdepartmenC? CIBCOMMIttEE YES NO — — 2. Has this persoNFirtn ever been a city employee? A SrqFF — YES NO D151Ri�T ��UN�i� 3. Does this person/firtn possess a ski�l not normaly possessed by any cuRent dty employee7 — — YES NO SUPPorxiS wHICH CAUNCIL oBJECnVE? Explain all yes answers on separate sheet antl attach to green sheet I 8 M, I$$UE.OPPORRINITY(WMO, WHAT, WHEN, WHERE, WH1�: The problem "defective sidewalk" was caused by multiple problems, tree roots, poor subgrade materials, freezetthaw cycles, service life limits, chemicaf additives, extseme temperature varia£wns, etc. These problems occur o� a citywide basis and must be addressed and corrected annually. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations. ADVANTAGES IF APPFSOVED: The community will benefit from this project because it will provide safe defect free sidewalks for its citizens. The sidewalk contracts are done by private contractors generating private sector jobs as a result. DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED: Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback because of construction procedures and assessments. Properry owners question the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized. Having to assess for walk reconstruction remains a controversial issue. DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPPWED: This option would aliow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in tum, will generate more personal injury suits, resufting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in repairs and replacement, as well as claim payouts. �v.z$g.°�',� ��wnsr�,h �;��$�'f H?�� - � f �� TOTALAMOUNTOPTRANSACTION$ � SJ COST/FiEVENUEBUDGETED(CIHCLEONE) YES No FUNDINGSOURCE 99'�MC�E169 /�., P�'/� ]9 = 63(3,O�o6 pCRV1TYNUMeER C994T752-0784-00000 FINANqALINFORMATION:(IXPWN) B' AST = 357 �QQ� C t C PB 9`3 = 5�;�00 �q Sy 3 SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMNIENDATIONS Ward 1 `/ � �� PROTECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. EDMLTND AVE. from Arundel St. to N. Westem Ave. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of four (4) complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, water pockets, asphalt patches, scaled, settled and cracked panels. PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. ELFELT ST. from Chazles Ave. to Thomas Ave. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of an inspection of the walk. EXTSTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, settled and cracked panels. ......................................................•---............................................... PROTECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. ELFELT ST. from Thomas Ave. to Como Ave. 5��j� INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public �� necessity on the basis of four (4) complaints and an inspection of the wa1k. EXIS1'ING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, water pockets, asphalt patches, scaled, settled and cracked panels. i�) ,� i PROTECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. N. GRIGGS ST. from Lafond Ave. to Blair Ave. & E.S. N. GRIGGS ST. from Thomas Ave. to Lafond Ave_ IIVITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Duector of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of of an inspection of the walk. qq_sy� -2- This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, settled and cracked panels. ................................... PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK E.S. N. HAMLINE AVE. from Sherburne Ave. to Thomas Ave. ��/► ,� IIVITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the D'uector of Public Works as public �� necessity on the basis of four (4) complaints and an inspection of the walk. This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, Cl � disintegrated, scaled, settled and cracked panels. PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. LAFOND AVE. from Farrington St. to Elfelt St. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the D'uector of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, scaled and settled panels. .................................................... �� PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. N. SYNDICATE ST. from Edmund Ave. to Thomas Ave. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint and an inspection of the walk. This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, settied and cracked panels. PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. N. SYNDICATE ST. from Lafond Ave. to �� t � Blair Ave. V I1vITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Duector of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of an inspection of the walk. c� q -.S4 3 -3- 59�q43 i,� EXISTIlVG CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches and scaled panels. PROJECT: RECONSI`I2UCT SIDEWALK B.S. N. 5YNDICATE ST. from W. Minnehaha Ave. to Seminary Ave. IriITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of five (5) complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, settled and cracked panels. PRO.iECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. THOMAS AVE. from Arundel St. to N. Western Ave. INITIATII�TG ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of two (2) complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, water pockets, asphalt patches, disintegrated, scaled, settled and cracked panels. V CITY OF ST. PAUL PRELIMINARY ORDER COUNCIL By File o._59 Voting Ward No. °19-'�l3 � ^. 5 - 5990 4 1 In the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction at the following locations: �� qq _Sy3 599055 - Both sides Edmund Avenue from Arundel Street to North Western Avenue. 599056 - Both sides Elfelt Street from Charles Avenue to Thomas Avenue. S99057 - Both sides Elfelt Street from Thomas Avenue to Como Avenue S99�58 - Both sides North Griggs Street from Lafond Avenue to Blair Avenue & East side North Griggs Street from Thomas Avenue to Lafond Avenue. S99059 - East side North Hamline Avenue from Sherburne Avenue to Thomas Avenue. 599060 - Both sides Lafond Avenue from Farrington Street to Elfelt Street. 599061 - Both sides North Syndicate Street from Edmund Avenue to Thomas Avenue. S99062 - Both sides North Syndicate Street from Lafond Avenue to Blair Avenue. S99063 - Both sides North Syndicate Street from West Minnehaha Avenue to Seminary Avenue. S99064 - Both sides Thomas Avenue from Arundel Street to North Western Avenue. qq •yt3 �q.54 *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) - 58.65 per front foot Por a £ive (5) foot wide walk and $10.38 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 1000 of the actual cost estimated to be approximately 53.87 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100% of actual cost estimated to be approximately $5.23 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, c� that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1998 Public Improvement Aid. 2 3 That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 9`" dav of June, 1999 5: 3� o' clock P.M. in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas / Nays t�� enanav ✓ Blakey Bostrom` IaW3�,,,Y Co 1 eman - �y c.�� Harris � {ah ✓Lantry ✓�eiter y In Favor � Against 3 AbS�.-� Adopted by Council: Date 1 �`� '� Certified Passed by Council Secretary BY �'� '-°_� �l' -_ � m-�.� - L \ Mayor