The URL can be used to link to this page

99-459�¢ 3 CYTY OE ST. PAUL � � COUNCIL FILE NO. !� �� S q FINAL ORDER 0 R 1 G i N A L By ��- y3 File No. SEE BELOW Voting Ward 2,3,5 In the Matter o£ sidewalk reconstruction at the following locations: WARD 5- 599007 - South side Como Ave. from Kent St. to N. Dale St. at 616 Como Ave. only aba Easy Streets West Bar & East side N. Dale St. from Burgess St. to Front Ave. WARD 3- S99008 - North side Watson Ave. from S. Syndicate St. to S. Hamline Ave. at 1311 Watson Ave. only. WARD 2 599009 - South side E. Fifth St. from Minnesota St. to N. Robert St., East side Minnesota St. from E. Fourth St. to E. Fifth St. & West side N. Robert St. from E. Fourth St. to E. Fifth St. at 322 Minnesota St. WARD 2- 599010 - South side W. Fifth St. from N. Wabasha St. to St. Peter St. at 350 St. Peter St. 1 �°l-4,s q *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIA.I, RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of o1d sidewalk) -$8.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $10.38 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. A11 other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.8'7 per square Poot. A11 corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $5.23 per square foot. under Preliminary order 9q - a�o approved �y ay, �� The Council of the City o£ Saint Pau1 has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thexeof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fu11y considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of 5aint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays �enanav Blakey- ��O.Sev��' �ostrom Coleman- ��e�� Adopted by CounciL• Date M� �( L�{�� ` r� - Certified Passed by Council Secretary �-Iarris �In Favor �antry �Reiter �Against �- Q�c�v�� Mayor rublic Hearing - May 26, 1999 RE 3-19-99 DEPALCLMENi/OFFICFJCOUNCII� • � DA7EINITIATED ND 61196 PublicWorksSidewalks i-2s_ss GREEN SHEET ,Nm�A,� :ONTACT GERSON 8 PHONE I� DEPARTIUEM DIREGTOR ❑ CiTY CAUNCIL Jerry Tvedt - 266-6087 ASSIGN cmnnowuEV C17YCLEflK MUSTBEONCOUNCILAGENDABY(DAT� NUMBERFOfl I� ❑ April 7, 1999 F011IING �gUWEfDIflEGTOR � or ublic hearin on Ma 26, 1999 �RDEF FIN.&MGT.SEFVICESDIR P 8 Y � MAYOR(ORASSISTANi) Q Council Resea�ch OTAItOFSIGNATUREPAGES 1 _(CLIPALLLOCATIONSFORSIGNATUF� u pS$pCIA7E u DEPARTMENTALACCOUNTAPfi CTION REQUESTED Reconstruct Sidewaik in Wards 2, 3& 5(See attached list) 1� �3 - � qq- ftECAMMENDATtONS: Appmve (A) or Reject A) pER50NAL SERVICE COMRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS: _PLANNINGCOMMISSION _CIVILSFANCECOMMISSION �, HasthispersoNfirmeverworkedunderaconVactforNisdepamnent? CIeCOMM�rfEE YES NO — 2. Has this persoNiirm ever heen a city empfayee? A ��F — YES NO _oisrpiCT CouNCi� _ 3. Does this persoNhrtn possess a skill not nortna➢y possessed by any current city employee? YES NO UPPORT$ WHICHCqUNCILOOJECTIVE'+ Explain all yes answers on separate sheet and attach to green sheet � s INrTIATING PROBLEM, ISSU .OPPORTUNIN(WHO. WHAT, WHEN, WHERE, WHY): The problem "defective sidewalk" was caused by multiple problems, tree roots, poor subgrade materials, freeze/thawxycles, service life limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and corrected annually. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falis and possible litigations. AOVqNTAGESIFAPPROVED; The community will benefit from this projecY because it wi0 provide safe defect free sidewalks for its citizens. The sidewalk contrac[s are done by private contractors generating private sector jobs as a result. DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED� Historically, the sidewalk reconstruction has created negative feedback because of construction procedures and assessments. Property owners question the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-haif the assessment is City subsidized. Having to assess for walk reconstruction remains a controversial issue. �� ,r �,'?�„��rt .�:,=- . . as 4 �" ' a 3 ��4 3 "a g�� ti � DISADVANiAGE51F NOT APPROVED: This option would atiow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal injury suits, resulting in the expenditure of larger dotlar amounts in repairs and replacement, as well as cla+m payouts. ; OTALAMOUNTOFTRANSACTION$ �{6�O�H,3} COST/REVENUEBUDGETED(CIRCLEONE) YES NO FUNDINGSOURCE )$-� -.0668 A , P�/� g8 = 5�$�t}QQ ACINfiYNUMBER C98-2T757-07 FINANCIALINFORMAtION:(EXPIAIN) B� AST = 325,,000 C. ChB 98 = 50i000 � qg-4s9 SUMMARX OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATTON � Ward 5 PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALH S.S. COMO AVE. from Kent St. to N. Dale St. at 616 Como Ave. Only dba Easy Streets West Bar & E.S. N. DALE ST. from Burgess St. to PYont Ave. 5�0� INITIATING ACTION: This order was irdtiated by a request from the property owner. This walk is poured concrete with multiple cracked panels. ................................................................... 9q -'�S � SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATION �� Ward 3 PROJECf: RECONSTRUCT SIDEVPALg N.S. WATSON AVE. from S. Syndicate St. to S. Hamline Ave. at 1311 Watson Ave. Only. 5 �� INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with cracked panels. ................................................................... °iq-'� 5 9 SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATIONS •�;�"-'� Ward 2 � , + �i 59901� PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK S.S. E. FIFTH ST. from Minnesota St. to N. Robert St., E.S. MINNESOTA ST. from E. Fourth St. to E. Fifth St. & W.S. N. ROBERT ST. from E. Fourth St_ to E_ Fifth St. at 322 Minnesota St. (US Bank). I1�IITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. and cracked panels. This walk is poured concrete with heaved, settled PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK S.S. W. FIFTH ST. from N. Wabasha St. to St. Peter St. at 350 St. Peter St. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. EXISTING� CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with holes in the areaway ceiling showing down into the basement. �9-� CITY OF 5T. PAUL COUNCIL FILE / NO. �`' '.R O PRELIMINARY ORDER By �IJ�f��/�'�� / File No. SEE BELOW Voting Ward 2,3,5 In the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction at the Pollowing locations: WARD 5 - 599067 - WARD 3 - 599008 - South side Como Ave, from Kent St. to N. Dale St. at 616 Como Ave. only aba Easy Streets West Bar & East side N. Dale St. from Burgess St. to Front Ave. North side Watson Ave. from S. Syndicate St. to S, Hamline Ave. at 1311 Watson Ave. only. WARD 2- 599009 - South side E. Fifth St. from Minnesota St. to N. Robert St., East side Minnesota St. from E. Fourth St. to E. FiPth St. & West side N. Robert St. from E. Fourth St. to E. Fifth St. at 322 Minnesota St. WARD 2- 599010 - 5outh side W. Fifth St. from N. Wabasha St, to 5t. Peter St. at 350 St. Peter St. ��-µS� �lg-��t *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (repiacement of old sidewalk) -$8.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $10.38 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.87 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $5.23 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1 � 3 That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1998 Public Improvement Aid. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 26 dav of Mav, 1999 at 5:30 o`clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court Aouse Building in the City of Saint Pau1. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCTLPERSONS Yeas Nays �enanav ✓�lakey +�3ostrom ✓C.`o leman �Yiarris �antry vKeiter �In Favor _�Against Adopted by Council: Date (�'�,�,�„ ,�y - ^._—.—t—t_ J Certified Passed by Council Secretary BY �� _ Mayor �¢ 3 CYTY OE ST. PAUL � � COUNCIL FILE NO. !� �� S q FINAL ORDER 0 R 1 G i N A L By ��- y3 File No. SEE BELOW Voting Ward 2,3,5 In the Matter o£ sidewalk reconstruction at the following locations: WARD 5- 599007 - South side Como Ave. from Kent St. to N. Dale St. at 616 Como Ave. only aba Easy Streets West Bar & East side N. Dale St. from Burgess St. to Front Ave. WARD 3- S99008 - North side Watson Ave. from S. Syndicate St. to S. Hamline Ave. at 1311 Watson Ave. only. WARD 2 599009 - South side E. Fifth St. from Minnesota St. to N. Robert St., East side Minnesota St. from E. Fourth St. to E. Fifth St. & West side N. Robert St. from E. Fourth St. to E. Fifth St. at 322 Minnesota St. WARD 2- 599010 - South side W. Fifth St. from N. Wabasha St. to St. Peter St. at 350 St. Peter St. 1 �°l-4,s q *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIA.I, RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of o1d sidewalk) -$8.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $10.38 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. A11 other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.8'7 per square Poot. A11 corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $5.23 per square foot. under Preliminary order 9q - a�o approved �y ay, �� The Council of the City o£ Saint Pau1 has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thexeof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fu11y considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of 5aint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays �enanav Blakey- ��O.Sev��' �ostrom Coleman- ��e�� Adopted by CounciL• Date M� �( L�{�� ` r� - Certified Passed by Council Secretary �-Iarris �In Favor �antry �Reiter �Against �- Q�c�v�� Mayor rublic Hearing - May 26, 1999 RE 3-19-99 DEPALCLMENi/OFFICFJCOUNCII� • � DA7EINITIATED ND 61196 PublicWorksSidewalks i-2s_ss GREEN SHEET ,Nm�A,� :ONTACT GERSON 8 PHONE I� DEPARTIUEM DIREGTOR ❑ CiTY CAUNCIL Jerry Tvedt - 266-6087 ASSIGN cmnnowuEV C17YCLEflK MUSTBEONCOUNCILAGENDABY(DAT� NUMBERFOfl I� ❑ April 7, 1999 F011IING �gUWEfDIflEGTOR � or ublic hearin on Ma 26, 1999 �RDEF FIN.&MGT.SEFVICESDIR P 8 Y � MAYOR(ORASSISTANi) Q Council Resea�ch OTAItOFSIGNATUREPAGES 1 _(CLIPALLLOCATIONSFORSIGNATUF� u pS$pCIA7E u DEPARTMENTALACCOUNTAPfi CTION REQUESTED Reconstruct Sidewaik in Wards 2, 3& 5(See attached list) 1� �3 - � qq- ftECAMMENDATtONS: Appmve (A) or Reject A) pER50NAL SERVICE COMRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS: _PLANNINGCOMMISSION _CIVILSFANCECOMMISSION �, HasthispersoNfirmeverworkedunderaconVactforNisdepamnent? CIeCOMM�rfEE YES NO — 2. Has this persoNiirm ever heen a city empfayee? A ��F — YES NO _oisrpiCT CouNCi� _ 3. Does this persoNhrtn possess a skill not nortna➢y possessed by any current city employee? YES NO UPPORT$ WHICHCqUNCILOOJECTIVE'+ Explain all yes answers on separate sheet and attach to green sheet � s INrTIATING PROBLEM, ISSU .OPPORTUNIN(WHO. WHAT, WHEN, WHERE, WHY): The problem "defective sidewalk" was caused by multiple problems, tree roots, poor subgrade materials, freeze/thawxycles, service life limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and corrected annually. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falis and possible litigations. AOVqNTAGESIFAPPROVED; The community will benefit from this projecY because it wi0 provide safe defect free sidewalks for its citizens. The sidewalk contrac[s are done by private contractors generating private sector jobs as a result. DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED� Historically, the sidewalk reconstruction has created negative feedback because of construction procedures and assessments. Property owners question the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-haif the assessment is City subsidized. Having to assess for walk reconstruction remains a controversial issue. �� ,r �,'?�„��rt .�:,=- . . as 4 �" ' a 3 ��4 3 "a g�� ti � DISADVANiAGE51F NOT APPROVED: This option would atiow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal injury suits, resulting in the expenditure of larger dotlar amounts in repairs and replacement, as well as cla+m payouts. ; OTALAMOUNTOFTRANSACTION$ �{6�O�H,3} COST/REVENUEBUDGETED(CIRCLEONE) YES NO FUNDINGSOURCE )$-� -.0668 A , P�/� g8 = 5�$�t}QQ ACINfiYNUMBER C98-2T757-07 FINANCIALINFORMAtION:(EXPIAIN) B� AST = 325,,000 C. ChB 98 = 50i000 � qg-4s9 SUMMARX OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATTON � Ward 5 PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALH S.S. COMO AVE. from Kent St. to N. Dale St. at 616 Como Ave. Only dba Easy Streets West Bar & E.S. N. DALE ST. from Burgess St. to PYont Ave. 5�0� INITIATING ACTION: This order was irdtiated by a request from the property owner. This walk is poured concrete with multiple cracked panels. ................................................................... 9q -'�S � SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATION �� Ward 3 PROJECf: RECONSTRUCT SIDEVPALg N.S. WATSON AVE. from S. Syndicate St. to S. Hamline Ave. at 1311 Watson Ave. Only. 5 �� INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with cracked panels. ................................................................... °iq-'� 5 9 SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATIONS •�;�"-'� Ward 2 � , + �i 59901� PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK S.S. E. FIFTH ST. from Minnesota St. to N. Robert St., E.S. MINNESOTA ST. from E. Fourth St. to E. Fifth St. & W.S. N. ROBERT ST. from E. Fourth St_ to E_ Fifth St. at 322 Minnesota St. (US Bank). I1�IITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. and cracked panels. This walk is poured concrete with heaved, settled PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK S.S. W. FIFTH ST. from N. Wabasha St. to St. Peter St. at 350 St. Peter St. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. EXISTING� CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with holes in the areaway ceiling showing down into the basement. �9-� CITY OF 5T. PAUL COUNCIL FILE / NO. �`' '.R O PRELIMINARY ORDER By �IJ�f��/�'�� / File No. SEE BELOW Voting Ward 2,3,5 In the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction at the Pollowing locations: WARD 5 - 599067 - WARD 3 - 599008 - South side Como Ave, from Kent St. to N. Dale St. at 616 Como Ave. only aba Easy Streets West Bar & East side N. Dale St. from Burgess St. to Front Ave. North side Watson Ave. from S. Syndicate St. to S, Hamline Ave. at 1311 Watson Ave. only. WARD 2- 599009 - South side E. Fifth St. from Minnesota St. to N. Robert St., East side Minnesota St. from E. Fourth St. to E. FiPth St. & West side N. Robert St. from E. Fourth St. to E. Fifth St. at 322 Minnesota St. WARD 2- 599010 - 5outh side W. Fifth St. from N. Wabasha St, to 5t. Peter St. at 350 St. Peter St. ��-µS� �lg-��t *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (repiacement of old sidewalk) -$8.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $10.38 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.87 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $5.23 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1 � 3 That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1998 Public Improvement Aid. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 26 dav of Mav, 1999 at 5:30 o`clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court Aouse Building in the City of Saint Pau1. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCTLPERSONS Yeas Nays �enanav ✓�lakey +�3ostrom ✓C.`o leman �Yiarris �antry vKeiter �In Favor _�Against Adopted by Council: Date (�'�,�,�„ ,�y - ^._—.—t—t_ J Certified Passed by Council Secretary BY �� _ Mayor �¢ 3 CYTY OE ST. PAUL � � COUNCIL FILE NO. !� �� S q FINAL ORDER 0 R 1 G i N A L By ��- y3 File No. SEE BELOW Voting Ward 2,3,5 In the Matter o£ sidewalk reconstruction at the following locations: WARD 5- 599007 - South side Como Ave. from Kent St. to N. Dale St. at 616 Como Ave. only aba Easy Streets West Bar & East side N. Dale St. from Burgess St. to Front Ave. WARD 3- S99008 - North side Watson Ave. from S. Syndicate St. to S. Hamline Ave. at 1311 Watson Ave. only. WARD 2 599009 - South side E. Fifth St. from Minnesota St. to N. Robert St., East side Minnesota St. from E. Fourth St. to E. Fifth St. & West side N. Robert St. from E. Fourth St. to E. Fifth St. at 322 Minnesota St. WARD 2- 599010 - South side W. Fifth St. from N. Wabasha St. to St. Peter St. at 350 St. Peter St. 1 �°l-4,s q *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIA.I, RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of o1d sidewalk) -$8.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $10.38 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. A11 other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.8'7 per square Poot. A11 corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $5.23 per square foot. under Preliminary order 9q - a�o approved �y ay, �� The Council of the City o£ Saint Pau1 has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thexeof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fu11y considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of 5aint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays �enanav Blakey- ��O.Sev��' �ostrom Coleman- ��e�� Adopted by CounciL• Date M� �( L�{�� ` r� - Certified Passed by Council Secretary �-Iarris �In Favor �antry �Reiter �Against �- Q�c�v�� Mayor rublic Hearing - May 26, 1999 RE 3-19-99 DEPALCLMENi/OFFICFJCOUNCII� • � DA7EINITIATED ND 61196 PublicWorksSidewalks i-2s_ss GREEN SHEET ,Nm�A,� :ONTACT GERSON 8 PHONE I� DEPARTIUEM DIREGTOR ❑ CiTY CAUNCIL Jerry Tvedt - 266-6087 ASSIGN cmnnowuEV C17YCLEflK MUSTBEONCOUNCILAGENDABY(DAT� NUMBERFOfl I� ❑ April 7, 1999 F011IING �gUWEfDIflEGTOR � or ublic hearin on Ma 26, 1999 �RDEF FIN.&MGT.SEFVICESDIR P 8 Y � MAYOR(ORASSISTANi) Q Council Resea�ch OTAItOFSIGNATUREPAGES 1 _(CLIPALLLOCATIONSFORSIGNATUF� u pS$pCIA7E u DEPARTMENTALACCOUNTAPfi CTION REQUESTED Reconstruct Sidewaik in Wards 2, 3& 5(See attached list) 1� �3 - � qq- ftECAMMENDATtONS: Appmve (A) or Reject A) pER50NAL SERVICE COMRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS: _PLANNINGCOMMISSION _CIVILSFANCECOMMISSION �, HasthispersoNfirmeverworkedunderaconVactforNisdepamnent? CIeCOMM�rfEE YES NO — 2. Has this persoNiirm ever heen a city empfayee? A ��F — YES NO _oisrpiCT CouNCi� _ 3. Does this persoNhrtn possess a skill not nortna➢y possessed by any current city employee? YES NO UPPORT$ WHICHCqUNCILOOJECTIVE'+ Explain all yes answers on separate sheet and attach to green sheet � s INrTIATING PROBLEM, ISSU .OPPORTUNIN(WHO. WHAT, WHEN, WHERE, WHY): The problem "defective sidewalk" was caused by multiple problems, tree roots, poor subgrade materials, freeze/thawxycles, service life limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and corrected annually. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falis and possible litigations. AOVqNTAGESIFAPPROVED; The community will benefit from this projecY because it wi0 provide safe defect free sidewalks for its citizens. The sidewalk contrac[s are done by private contractors generating private sector jobs as a result. DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED� Historically, the sidewalk reconstruction has created negative feedback because of construction procedures and assessments. Property owners question the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-haif the assessment is City subsidized. Having to assess for walk reconstruction remains a controversial issue. �� ,r �,'?�„��rt .�:,=- . . as 4 �" ' a 3 ��4 3 "a g�� ti � DISADVANiAGE51F NOT APPROVED: This option would atiow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal injury suits, resulting in the expenditure of larger dotlar amounts in repairs and replacement, as well as cla+m payouts. ; OTALAMOUNTOFTRANSACTION$ �{6�O�H,3} COST/REVENUEBUDGETED(CIRCLEONE) YES NO FUNDINGSOURCE )$-� -.0668 A , P�/� g8 = 5�$�t}QQ ACINfiYNUMBER C98-2T757-07 FINANCIALINFORMAtION:(EXPIAIN) B� AST = 325,,000 C. ChB 98 = 50i000 � qg-4s9 SUMMARX OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATTON � Ward 5 PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALH S.S. COMO AVE. from Kent St. to N. Dale St. at 616 Como Ave. Only dba Easy Streets West Bar & E.S. N. DALE ST. from Burgess St. to PYont Ave. 5�0� INITIATING ACTION: This order was irdtiated by a request from the property owner. This walk is poured concrete with multiple cracked panels. ................................................................... 9q -'�S � SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATION �� Ward 3 PROJECf: RECONSTRUCT SIDEVPALg N.S. WATSON AVE. from S. Syndicate St. to S. Hamline Ave. at 1311 Watson Ave. Only. 5 �� INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with cracked panels. ................................................................... °iq-'� 5 9 SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATIONS •�;�"-'� Ward 2 � , + �i 59901� PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK S.S. E. FIFTH ST. from Minnesota St. to N. Robert St., E.S. MINNESOTA ST. from E. Fourth St. to E. Fifth St. & W.S. N. ROBERT ST. from E. Fourth St_ to E_ Fifth St. at 322 Minnesota St. (US Bank). I1�IITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. and cracked panels. This walk is poured concrete with heaved, settled PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK S.S. W. FIFTH ST. from N. Wabasha St. to St. Peter St. at 350 St. Peter St. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. EXISTING� CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with holes in the areaway ceiling showing down into the basement. �9-� CITY OF 5T. PAUL COUNCIL FILE / NO. �`' '.R O PRELIMINARY ORDER By �IJ�f��/�'�� / File No. SEE BELOW Voting Ward 2,3,5 In the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction at the Pollowing locations: WARD 5 - 599067 - WARD 3 - 599008 - South side Como Ave, from Kent St. to N. Dale St. at 616 Como Ave. only aba Easy Streets West Bar & East side N. Dale St. from Burgess St. to Front Ave. North side Watson Ave. from S. Syndicate St. to S, Hamline Ave. at 1311 Watson Ave. only. WARD 2- 599009 - South side E. Fifth St. from Minnesota St. to N. Robert St., East side Minnesota St. from E. Fourth St. to E. FiPth St. & West side N. Robert St. from E. Fourth St. to E. Fifth St. at 322 Minnesota St. WARD 2- 599010 - 5outh side W. Fifth St. from N. Wabasha St, to 5t. Peter St. at 350 St. Peter St. ��-µS� �lg-��t *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (repiacement of old sidewalk) -$8.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $10.38 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.87 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $5.23 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1 � 3 That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1998 Public Improvement Aid. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 26 dav of Mav, 1999 at 5:30 o`clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court Aouse Building in the City of Saint Pau1. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCTLPERSONS Yeas Nays �enanav ✓�lakey +�3ostrom ✓C.`o leman �Yiarris �antry vKeiter �In Favor _�Against Adopted by Council: Date (�'�,�,�„ ,�y - ^._—.—t—t_ J Certified Passed by Council Secretary BY �� _ Mayor