The URL can be used to link to this page

99-337CZTY OE ST. PAUL COUNC . � LE �` 339 FINAL ORDER By File No. S BELOW Voting Ward 3 In the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction at the following locations: 599001 -&oth sides South Albert St. from Stanford Ave to Berkeley Ave. 599002 - North side Palace Ave from South Saratoga St. to South Pascal St. *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES y� RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$8.65 per Pront foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $10.38 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 1Q�o of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.87 per square foot. A11 corner residential properties wi11 receive a credit up to the first 150 Peet oP new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESTDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100a of actual cost estimated to be approximately $5.23 per square foot. under Preliminary order �q -^ � � approved � ,Q� ,' � �q�� \ `Phe Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RE50LVED, That the Council of the City o£ Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate a11 expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCTLPERSONS Yeas Nays B�nanav� �� Blakey ✓Bostrom �oleman �f-Iarris ✓�antry l�teiter Adopted by Council: Date_�,�( �� `l`1q Certified Passed by Council Secretary �o In Favor By�� _ ��- ,�\a,�,�.� „ , �'i Against C_.l�C'"�G�.� ��liJ v � I�bs�r, ��/ Mayor %�/� Works Sidewalks by GREEN SHEET INRIAVDATE DEPAFtTMENT DIRECTOR CT'ATfORNEY &10GET �IRECTOR MAYOfl (OR ASSISTANfJ PAGR _ ]_ _ (CLIPALLLOCATONSFOfi51GNATUR� Construct & Reconstruct Sidewalk in Ward 3(See attached list) NNING CAMMlSSION CIB fAMMil7EE STAFF WHICH COUNCIL O&IECi7VE? �t°l - 3 3� NO. 3��L7-� ❑ CfTY COUNCIL ❑CfiYCLEHK ❑ FlN. & MGT, SERVICES DIR 7� Council Research ASSOCIATE � � DEPARiMENiALACCOUM'ANf � 1.� �• � r � PERSONAL SERVICE COMRACTS MUST ANSWER TNE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS: CIVILSERVICECOMMISSION 1. HasthispersoMfircnevervrorkedu�WeraconVaciforNisdepaAmerrt? YES NO 2. Has ihis personffirm ever been a ciry employee? YES NO 3. Does ihis persoNFlrm possess a skiil not nortnflNy possessed by arry curtent city employee? YES NO �plain all yes answer5 on separa[e sheet antl attach to green sheet ISSUE, OPPORTUNITY (WHO. The problem "defeciive sidewalk" was created because ot tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, alternating freeRhaw cycles, service life limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a ciiywide Ievel and must be addressed and corrected on an annuai basis. Left uncorrected, tFie sidewalk condition wouid worsen to a State where it would be rendered unusable and subjeet to increased pedestrian injuries from fails and possible titigations. The community will benefit from this project because it will provide safe defect free sidewalks for its many cidzens. The sidewalk crontracis are executed by private contractors, so it follows that private sector jobs are created as a result of this activity. IF APPRWED. Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessmeni. Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it stiil remains controversial. This option wouid allow the infrastructure of sidewalk siock to deteriorate, which In tum, will generate more personal injury suits, ultimately resulting in the expenditure of larger doliar amounis in eventual repairs and/or repiacement, as well as daim payouts. %,•_��;':� ��'��'i �'s��is�€ �� '� TOTAL AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION $ ]( gg5 _ pp COST/REVENUE BUDGE7ED (CIRCLE ONE) YES No FUNDINGSOURCE }$ A P!A 9$ = 618 ,Q�0 ACINffYNUMBER C98-2T751-0784 FINANCIALINWRMATION:(IXPLAIN) g, AST = 325 �QOO C, Cts 98 = 50,000 1 SUMMARY 4F ENGINEERING RECQMMENDATIONS Ward 3 r�q. �3Q PROJECf: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALS B.S. S. ALBERT ST. from Stanford Ave. to Berkeley Ave. �� IINITIATING ACTION: as public necessity on walk. This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works the basis of one (i) complaint and an inspection of the EXISTING GONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, scaled and cracked panels. ...... ............................................................. FROJECT: GONSTRUCT & RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALH N.S. PALACE AVE. from S. Saratoga St. to S. Pascal St. ,�,/� INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works �'1�1j as public necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint, a call from a neighborhood resident asking for completion of the walk and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIQNS: This waik is poured cancrete with heaves, asphalt patches, scaled and cracked panels. ................................................................... aa-�� CITY OF ST. PAUL COU L$fIZE . ��,S� q�` (( PRELIM223ARY ORDER BY u K Fil No. SEE BELOW Voting Ward 3 In the Mattsr of sidewalk reconstruction at the £ollowing locations: 599601 - Both sides South Albert St. from Stan£ord Ave to Berkeley Ave. S99Q02 - North side Palace Ave from South Saratoga St. to South Pascal St. *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) - 58.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $10.38 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. Al1 other widths wi11 be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100$ of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.87 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the £irst 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $5_23 per square foot. The Council of the City o£ Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: l. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ASOVE £or estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1998 Public Improvement Aid. 2. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the lA�" dav o£ Abril, 1999 at 5:3� o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. 3. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature oP the improvement and the total cost thereo£ as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS eas Nays f � nanav i/Blakey �strom � C� leman t/Fiarris �antry 1/F�eiter �In Favor �Against � A b��} Adopted by Council: Date ��Q� �'� �`f �('� i CertiPied Passed by Council Secretary $Y _ ` 1 �i �i-�,.-._� .�J Mayor CZTY OE ST. PAUL COUNC . � LE �` 339 FINAL ORDER By File No. S BELOW Voting Ward 3 In the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction at the following locations: 599001 -&oth sides South Albert St. from Stanford Ave to Berkeley Ave. 599002 - North side Palace Ave from South Saratoga St. to South Pascal St. *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES y� RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$8.65 per Pront foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $10.38 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 1Q�o of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.87 per square foot. A11 corner residential properties wi11 receive a credit up to the first 150 Peet oP new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESTDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100a of actual cost estimated to be approximately $5.23 per square foot. under Preliminary order �q -^ � � approved � ,Q� ,' � �q�� \ `Phe Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RE50LVED, That the Council of the City o£ Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate a11 expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCTLPERSONS Yeas Nays B�nanav� �� Blakey ✓Bostrom �oleman �f-Iarris ✓�antry l�teiter Adopted by Council: Date_�,�( �� `l`1q Certified Passed by Council Secretary �o In Favor By�� _ ��- ,�\a,�,�.� „ , �'i Against C_.l�C'"�G�.� ��liJ v � I�bs�r, ��/ Mayor %�/� Works Sidewalks by GREEN SHEET INRIAVDATE DEPAFtTMENT DIRECTOR CT'ATfORNEY &10GET �IRECTOR MAYOfl (OR ASSISTANfJ PAGR _ ]_ _ (CLIPALLLOCATONSFOfi51GNATUR� Construct & Reconstruct Sidewalk in Ward 3(See attached list) NNING CAMMlSSION CIB fAMMil7EE STAFF WHICH COUNCIL O&IECi7VE? �t°l - 3 3� NO. 3��L7-� ❑ CfTY COUNCIL ❑CfiYCLEHK ❑ FlN. & MGT, SERVICES DIR 7� Council Research ASSOCIATE � � DEPARiMENiALACCOUM'ANf � 1.� �• � r � PERSONAL SERVICE COMRACTS MUST ANSWER TNE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS: CIVILSERVICECOMMISSION 1. HasthispersoMfircnevervrorkedu�WeraconVaciforNisdepaAmerrt? YES NO 2. Has ihis personffirm ever been a ciry employee? YES NO 3. Does ihis persoNFlrm possess a skiil not nortnflNy possessed by arry curtent city employee? YES NO �plain all yes answer5 on separa[e sheet antl attach to green sheet ISSUE, OPPORTUNITY (WHO. The problem "defeciive sidewalk" was created because ot tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, alternating freeRhaw cycles, service life limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a ciiywide Ievel and must be addressed and corrected on an annuai basis. Left uncorrected, tFie sidewalk condition wouid worsen to a State where it would be rendered unusable and subjeet to increased pedestrian injuries from fails and possible titigations. The community will benefit from this project because it will provide safe defect free sidewalks for its many cidzens. The sidewalk crontracis are executed by private contractors, so it follows that private sector jobs are created as a result of this activity. IF APPRWED. Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessmeni. Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it stiil remains controversial. This option wouid allow the infrastructure of sidewalk siock to deteriorate, which In tum, will generate more personal injury suits, ultimately resulting in the expenditure of larger doliar amounis in eventual repairs and/or repiacement, as well as daim payouts. %,•_��;':� ��'��'i �'s��is�€ �� '� TOTAL AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION $ ]( gg5 _ pp COST/REVENUE BUDGE7ED (CIRCLE ONE) YES No FUNDINGSOURCE }$ A P!A 9$ = 618 ,Q�0 ACINffYNUMBER C98-2T751-0784 FINANCIALINWRMATION:(IXPLAIN) g, AST = 325 �QOO C, Cts 98 = 50,000 SUMMARY 4F ENGINEERING RECQMMENDATIONS Ward 3 r�q. �3Q PROJECf: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALS B.S. S. ALBERT ST. from Stanford Ave. to Berkeley Ave. �� IINITIATING ACTION: as public necessity on walk. This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works the basis of one (i) complaint and an inspection of the EXISTING GONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, scaled and cracked panels. ...... ............................................................. FROJECT: GONSTRUCT & RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALH N.S. PALACE AVE. from S. Saratoga St. to S. Pascal St. ,�,/� INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works �'1�1j as public necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint, a call from a neighborhood resident asking for completion of the walk and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIQNS: This waik is poured cancrete with heaves, asphalt patches, scaled and cracked panels. 1 ................................................................... aa-�� CITY OF ST. PAUL COU L$fIZE . ��,S� q�` (( PRELIM223ARY ORDER BY u K Fil No. SEE BELOW Voting Ward 3 In the Mattsr of sidewalk reconstruction at the £ollowing locations: 599601 - Both sides South Albert St. from Stan£ord Ave to Berkeley Ave. S99Q02 - North side Palace Ave from South Saratoga St. to South Pascal St. *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) - 58.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $10.38 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. Al1 other widths wi11 be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100$ of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.87 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the £irst 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $5_23 per square foot. The Council of the City o£ Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: l. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ASOVE £or estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1998 Public Improvement Aid. 2. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the lA�" dav o£ Abril, 1999 at 5:3� o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. 3. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature oP the improvement and the total cost thereo£ as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS eas Nays f � nanav i/Blakey �strom � C� leman t/Fiarris �antry 1/F�eiter �In Favor �Against � A b��} Adopted by Council: Date ��Q� �'� �`f �('� i CertiPied Passed by Council Secretary $Y _ ` 1 �i �i-�,.-._� .�J Mayor CZTY OE ST. PAUL COUNC . � LE �` 339 FINAL ORDER By File No. S BELOW Voting Ward 3 In the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction at the following locations: 599001 -&oth sides South Albert St. from Stanford Ave to Berkeley Ave. 599002 - North side Palace Ave from South Saratoga St. to South Pascal St. *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES y� RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$8.65 per Pront foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $10.38 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 1Q�o of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.87 per square foot. A11 corner residential properties wi11 receive a credit up to the first 150 Peet oP new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESTDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100a of actual cost estimated to be approximately $5.23 per square foot. under Preliminary order �q -^ � � approved � ,Q� ,' � �q�� \ `Phe Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RE50LVED, That the Council of the City o£ Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate a11 expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCTLPERSONS Yeas Nays B�nanav� �� Blakey ✓Bostrom �oleman �f-Iarris ✓�antry l�teiter Adopted by Council: Date_�,�( �� `l`1q Certified Passed by Council Secretary �o In Favor By�� _ ��- ,�\a,�,�.� „ , �'i Against C_.l�C'"�G�.� ��liJ v � I�bs�r, ��/ Mayor %�/� Works Sidewalks by GREEN SHEET INRIAVDATE DEPAFtTMENT DIRECTOR CT'ATfORNEY &10GET �IRECTOR MAYOfl (OR ASSISTANfJ PAGR _ ]_ _ (CLIPALLLOCATONSFOfi51GNATUR� Construct & Reconstruct Sidewalk in Ward 3(See attached list) NNING CAMMlSSION CIB fAMMil7EE STAFF WHICH COUNCIL O&IECi7VE? �t°l - 3 3� NO. 3��L7-� ❑ CfTY COUNCIL ❑CfiYCLEHK ❑ FlN. & MGT, SERVICES DIR 7� Council Research ASSOCIATE � � DEPARiMENiALACCOUM'ANf � 1.� �• � r � PERSONAL SERVICE COMRACTS MUST ANSWER TNE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS: CIVILSERVICECOMMISSION 1. HasthispersoMfircnevervrorkedu�WeraconVaciforNisdepaAmerrt? YES NO 2. Has ihis personffirm ever been a ciry employee? YES NO 3. Does ihis persoNFlrm possess a skiil not nortnflNy possessed by arry curtent city employee? YES NO �plain all yes answer5 on separa[e sheet antl attach to green sheet ISSUE, OPPORTUNITY (WHO. The problem "defeciive sidewalk" was created because ot tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, alternating freeRhaw cycles, service life limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a ciiywide Ievel and must be addressed and corrected on an annuai basis. Left uncorrected, tFie sidewalk condition wouid worsen to a State where it would be rendered unusable and subjeet to increased pedestrian injuries from fails and possible titigations. The community will benefit from this project because it will provide safe defect free sidewalks for its many cidzens. The sidewalk crontracis are executed by private contractors, so it follows that private sector jobs are created as a result of this activity. IF APPRWED. Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessmeni. Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it stiil remains controversial. This option wouid allow the infrastructure of sidewalk siock to deteriorate, which In tum, will generate more personal injury suits, ultimately resulting in the expenditure of larger doliar amounis in eventual repairs and/or repiacement, as well as daim payouts. %,•_��;':� ��'��'i �'s��is�€ �� '� TOTAL AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION $ ]( gg5 _ pp COST/REVENUE BUDGE7ED (CIRCLE ONE) YES No FUNDINGSOURCE }$ A P!A 9$ = 618 ,Q�0 ACINffYNUMBER C98-2T751-0784 FINANCIALINWRMATION:(IXPLAIN) g, AST = 325 �QOO C, Cts 98 = 50,000 SUMMARY 4F ENGINEERING RECQMMENDATIONS Ward 3 �q. �39 PROJECf: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALS B.S. S. ALBERT ST. from Stanford Ave. to Berkeley Ave. �� IINITIATING ACTION: as public necessity on walk. This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works the basis of one (i) complaint and an inspection of the EXISTING GONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, scaled and cracked panels. ...... ............................................................. FROJECT: GONSTRUCT & RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALH N.S. PALACE AVE. from S. Saratoga St. to S. Pascal St. ,�,/� INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works �'1�1j as public necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint, a call from a neighborhood resident asking for completion of the walk and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIQNS: This waik is poured cancrete with heaves, asphalt patches, scaled and cracked panels. 1 ................................................................... aa-�� CITY OF ST. PAUL COU L$fIZE . ��,S� q�` (( PRELIM223ARY ORDER BY u K Fil No. SEE BELOW Voting Ward 3 In the Mattsr of sidewalk reconstruction at the £ollowing locations: 599601 - Both sides South Albert St. from Stan£ord Ave to Berkeley Ave. S99Q02 - North side Palace Ave from South Saratoga St. to South Pascal St. *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) - 58.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $10.38 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. Al1 other widths wi11 be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100$ of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.87 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the £irst 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $5_23 per square foot. The Council of the City o£ Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: l. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ASOVE £or estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1998 Public Improvement Aid. 2. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the lA�" dav o£ Abril, 1999 at 5:3� o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. 3. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature oP the improvement and the total cost thereo£ as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS eas Nays f � nanav i/Blakey �strom � C� leman t/Fiarris �antry 1/F�eiter �In Favor �Against � A b��} Adopted by Council: Date ��Q� �'� �`f �('� i CertiPied Passed by Council Secretary $Y _ ` 1 �i �i-�,.-._� .�J Mayor