The URL can be used to link to this page

98-750CITY OF ST. PAUI, FINAL ORDER ORIG�NAL �J'�h`�r`�`�� lla�/o5 COUNC N0. ��SO B y � File No. 5981 Voting Ward 2 In the Matter of new sidewalk construction at the following locations: 598109 - West side Chester St. from E. Plato Blvd. to E. Lafayette Rd E. Plato B1vd. from Chester St. to E. Lafayette Rd. , *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES South side RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) - 57.65 per £ro foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $9.18 per front foot for a six (6) foot ide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. Ne construction (where no walk existed) - 1000 of the actual cost estima ed to be approximately $3.42 per square foot. Al1 corner residential properties will receive a cr it up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and ab ting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family stru ures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of a ual cost estimated to be approximately $4.62 per square foot. under Preliminary order �+ � approved � The Council of the City of Saint P ul has conducte pu7� ic hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof aving been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has he rd all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed imp ovement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Coun il of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvemen e made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, hat upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calcul te all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in ccordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas N� Benanav Blakey Bostro s _In Favor Adopted by Council: Date Certified Passed by Council Secretary � ter Against Mayor QP.�SO DEPAflTMEM/OFFlCE�OUNCIL DAiEINR1ATED GREEN SHEET NO. 3 �� 0 � Public Works Sidewalks 5-1598 iNinnware wrrwwnrE CONTACTPEAS�N&PFIONE �pEpp{{�(�{TDIflECTOR C(IYCOUNGIL LartyH.Lueth-26&6083 � �cmarroaruer CRYCLERK MUST BE ON COl1NCfL AGENDA BY (DAlEy ROUTING a g�7pGEi' p�pECTOFi � FIN. 8 MGT. SEPVICES D1 OftOfA �MAYOR (OR ASSISTANi] � COUf1C1I REfi�O(C}i TOTALfOF9GNATUNEPAGES _ (q1PALLlOCA7101SADR3IGNANiiES � A£SOCfATE � U ACTION pEWESTED � Construct Sidewalk in Ward 2(See attached list) � aECauMENOAnoNS: nanwa W ar ae� (a1 pERSONAL SERYICE CONTRe1CTS MUST ANSWER THE FOILOWING QUESTIONS: _PLANNING COMMISSION _CNIL SEAYN:E COMMISSION 1. H35 Sh15 E Def50f1(F NO ef WOfkOd UtMef d�f1tf2Ct fOf tl115 d@P2fMEn[? �/ 8 CIB COMMITfEE 2. Has ihis personlfirm ever been a ary employee? — — YES NO A sTqFF 3. Dces this person/firm possess a skill not normally possessed by any current city — — employee? DISTRICiCAUNqL YES NO SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL OBJECTPJE? �PUi^ ali yes answers on separete sheet and attacM to grean shaet INITIA7ING PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPOR7UNIiV (WHO. WNA7. WHEN, WHEPE, W111�: The problem "defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade materiai, aiternating free/thaw cycles, service life limils, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide level and must be addressed and corrected on an annual basis. left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusable and subjed to increased pedestrian injuries from fails and possible litigations. ADVANTAGESIFAPPROVED: The community will benefit fwm this project because it will provide safe detect free sidewa cs for its many citizens. The sidewalk contracts are executed by private contractors, so it tollows that private sector jobs are created s a re U��SP�sr��1tQt r� ,lUL 1 � '�� DISADVANTAGES IF APPFOVED: Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment. Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it still remains controversial. DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED: This option would aliow the infrastruc[ure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal in}ury suits, ultimately resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in eventual repairs and/or replacement, as well as claim payouts. TQTAI.AMOUMOFTNANSACTION ', ; 1 �� CDST/IiEVENUEBUDGETED(CIBCLEONE) YES NO FUNDINGSOURCE 9 $ ��`�"�$ � — F� ACINITVNUMBER C9$^ZT�5�-�784��O�OQ FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (EXPLAIN) r� "' a c, ct� 98 = 5o;aoo i. �� / �UMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATION ald-'un Ward 2 PROJECT' COi�ISTRUCT SIDEWAI.K W.S. CHESTER ST. from E. Plato Blvd. to E. Lafayette Rd. & S.S. E. PLATO BLUll. from Chester St. to E. Lafayette Rd. IPTITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a letter from Metro'I7ansit making a request for city sidewalk installation, EXISTII�G CONDITIONS: This order is first time construction. .................................................................. ORIGINAL CITY OF ST. PALSL PRELIId2NARY ORDER Exhibit A 98'-�sc COUN LE + � � By File No. 598109 Voting Ward 2 Zn the Matter of sidevcalk reconstruction at the following locations: 598109 - West side Chester St. from E. Plato Blvd. to E. La£ayette Rd. & South side E. Plato Blvd. Erom Chester St_ to E. Lafayette Rd. *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTIQN RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three £amily structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.65 per front Poot Por a five (5) foot wide walk and 59.18 per £ront foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.42 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property_ MULTI-RESIDENTIAL{More than three £amily structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100a of actual cost estimated to be approximately 54.62 per square £oot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, � that the estimated cost thereo£ is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1998 Public Improvement Aid. � � That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 12th dav of Auaust. 1998 5:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Flall and Court Aouse Building in the City of Saint Paul, That notice o£ said public hearing be qiven to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays ✓Benanav ✓Blakey �/BOStrom ✓COleman �arris �ntry ✓keiter �In Favor �Against Adopted by Council: Date`\��ltf Certified Passed by Counci retary By � ��