The URL can be used to link to this page

98-606CITY OF ST. PAUL FINAL ORDER t��tA�. � FILE NO. 598079 VOTING WARD 3 In the Matter of 598079 - Sidewalk reconstruction on both sides Jefferson Avenue from South Fairview Avenue to South Prior Avenue. A �C'i�e.rdw.cr�T � �\C-'YhoV�� d�¢c\' O� Y�eCOV+S�cv,�! fa � � �i��qa o . � 8' s o o �,a Rv ��.�-e .. Laid over from 6/24J98 under Preliminary Order 98-437 approved May 20. 1998 The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WAEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays ✓ Blakey - P�s�r� ✓Bostrom � ✓ Cc�leman - Pb�� Harris ✓Lantry �iter S In Favor � Against a ��a� - ��j�� 39 co czL g=L a. Q8-G�l� a BY � Adopted by Council: Date �°�� Certified Passed by Council Secretary Mayor �' �.,. ;, Public Hearing Date — June 24, 1998 RE 5-8-98 � !��►I� °EP °A �'"'�"� D GREEN SHEET No. �� Public Works Sidewaiks 4-3-98 wmawAre wRUwn C:�NTAGT PERSON a PFIONE pEPApTMENT DIRECTOA � CiTY CAUNCIL � L3(fyH.LUBth-266-60$� ��N �CRYATfOFNE1' �CISYCLERK NUNBER Pofl M115T6EONCOUNCiLAGENDABY(DAT� S-ZO-9S R �� DGETDIRECTOR �FW.aMGT.SERVICESOi For Public Hearing on 6-24-98 ��OR(OflASSiSTAM) OCouncil Research TOiAl,eOFSIGNANREPAGES i (CLLPAIILOCAiIONSFORSIGNATUR@ �ASSOCNiE A � EMAIACCWNTAM OGTqN AEWESTED - � y Reconstruct Sidewalk in Ward 3(See attached list) � o��R Q►�f �o�-�eR wR]}�ER �IxU�rDN �(Z�fl� 'TU� 7 /4s fl �� N'=� PERSONALSERVICECOMRACTSMUSTANSWERTHEWLLOWING�UESTIONS: _PLANNWG CAMMISSION _ GNIL SEfiVICE COMMISSION 7• F1d5 @tl^+ P� � NO ef WOIkBd �ndef d COlIVdC[ (of ihi5 dBparQtta�t? YE CIB CoMMR7EE _ 2. Has �his �ES � NO ef been a ciry employee? A STAFf 3- Daes this person/firm possess a skill not normally possessed by any wrrent ciry empioyee? DISTRICT WUNCIL YES NO SUPPOATS wF1iCH CAUNGL OBJEC7NET �plain all yes afYwers on separate sheet a�ul altath io grben shaet INITIATING PA081EM. ISSUE. OPPORiUNIT' (WHO, WHAT. WHEN, WHERE, WHV): The problem "defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, aHernating freerthaw cycles, service 1'rfe limits, chemicaf additives, ex[reme temperature variations, etc. These problems oxur on a citywide levef and must be addressed and corracted on an ann�al basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it woufd be rendered unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations. ADVANTAGES IF APPflOVED: The commun@y wil{ benefit from this project because it wi{4 provide safe detect tree sidewalks for its many citizens. The sidewalk crontracts are axecuted 6y Qrivate contractors, so R follows that private sector jobs are created as a resuft of this activity. DISADVANTAGES IF APPAOVED: Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment. Simpiy stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it stili remains comroversial. DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPflOVEO: . This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal injury suits, uRimately resulting in the expenditure of larger doliar amounts in eventuai repairs and/or replacement, as well as claim payouts. TOTALAMIXIMOFTHANSACTIONS �],90J,HH COST/pEVENUEBU�GETED(CIRCLEONE) YES No FUNDINGSWRCE 9$"M A, PIA 98 = 6�8�� ACINITYNUMBER C 8-21' j-0 8 FINANCIAL INFOFMATION: (EXPUIIM B t AST = 325 000 C, Cis g8 = 50;000 CTTY OF 5T. PAUL �ISAL ORDER 4R1G1NAl 39 CO CIL FIL O. q S�(e � Co sY /�2L�� /`�Zl� r FILE NO. 598079 VOTING WARD 3 In the Matter of 598079 - Sidewalk reconstruction on both sides Jefferson Avenue from South Fairview Avenue to South Prior Avenue. Laid over from 6/24/98 �`p�to�lr�c� ��t r "� C �1 S�'/l�( c � �� V �jjtL G� �� under Preliminary Order 98-437 approved May 20. 1998 The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as �rescribed by the City Charter; and WHSREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and � recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter_ COUNCII.,PERSONS Yeas Nays Benanav Blakey Bostrom Coleman Harris Lantry Reiter � Adopted by Council: Date Certified Passed by Council Secretary _In Favor _Against � Mayor Public Hearing Date - June 24, 1 „ o�rnnna�r+rrocF�,�ouNCa Pubt'�c Works Sidewalks COMACT PERSON 8 PHONE Larry H. Lueth - 266-6083 MUSTBEONCOUI�CLLAGENDABY(DA'!� S��LO�SS For Public Hearing on 6-24-98 TOTAL t OF SIQlUNHE PAGES�^�_ � p 1 �_ �8-98 GREEN SHEET WI71Ai/DATE A7TDpNEY `_ Q Maroa �oa ass�sraNr� (CLIP ALL LOCA7IONS FOk SIGWTUR� n ASSOCIATE Recanstruct Sidewalk in Ward 3(See attached Gs2_ ) _ � � �� tA OY�R $f �fWNU� �6�, Wl� �EP �Ix ylf COAIMR7EE CouNCIL oBJECTNE9 (�N 0.�9�i�M' MRIAClDA'(� � crn ca,HC+c �Y -ta � CRYCLERK � FW. f MGi. SERV7CES Dfq. ] Counal Resea A � NTALACCWNi � �$ PEHSONAI SERVICE COMRACTS MU5T ANSWER THE FOLLOWIN6 CUESTIONS: t. Has this persorvfi NOer worked under a convact (w this deparonent7 Y Z � m � YES � NO er been a ary employee? 3. Ooes this persoNfirm possess a sMii nat namdty possessetl by any current dry employee? � NO Expiatn ali yas answera on saparata sheet and altaeh to grvan ahaat ITIATWG AA06LEA1, 195UE, OPAL7FTUN7TY (N'HO, NNA7 WNEN, WHEAE. WNY): The problem "detective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, altemating freerthaw cycies, service I'rfe limits, chemical addftives, eMreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a crtywide level and must be addressed and correctad on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk cond'Rion would worsen to a state whera it would be rendered unusable and subjed to increased pedesVian injuries from falls and possible I'rtigations. The community witt benefit from this project because it wiii provide safe detect hes sidewatks ior its many cBizens. The sidewatk contracts are executed by private contractors, so it to(fows that private sector jobs are created as a resuft of this adivity. Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment. Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it still remains controversial. This option would allow the infrastructure ot sidewalk stock to deferiorate, whkh in turn, wil! generale more personal injury sufts, uRimatety resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounTS in eventual repairs and/or repfacemenT, as well as cfaim payou[s. TOTAI. AMOUM OF TiUNSACfION S FUNOINGSWRCE 98�f'� Fwu+cuw wcoFUVaroN: �zPUiM PIA 98 = AST a C, C!8 98 = 50,000 COSTIREVEMUE BUDCETED (CIRCLE ONE) acmmNUeeeeA C98-2T757-I 0 e CITY OF ST. PAUL FINAL ORDER t��tA�. � FILE NO. 598079 VOTING WARD 3 In the Matter of 598079 - Sidewalk reconstruction on both sides Jefferson Avenue from South Fairview Avenue to South Prior Avenue. A �C'i�e.rdw.cr�T � �\C-'YhoV�� d�¢c\' O� Y�eCOV+S�cv,�! fa � � �i��qa o . � 8' s o o �,a Rv ��.�-e .. Laid over from 6/24J98 under Preliminary Order 98-437 approved May 20. 1998 The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WAEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays ✓ Blakey - P�s�r� ✓Bostrom � ✓ Cc�leman - Pb�� Harris ✓Lantry �iter S In Favor � Against a ��a� - ��j�� 39 co czL g=L a. Q8-G�l� a BY � Adopted by Council: Date �°�� Certified Passed by Council Secretary Mayor �' �.,. ;, Public Hearing Date — June 24, 1998 RE 5-8-98 � !��►I� °EP °A �'"'�"� D GREEN SHEET No. �� Public Works Sidewaiks 4-3-98 wmawAre wRUwn C:�NTAGT PERSON a PFIONE pEPApTMENT DIRECTOA � CiTY CAUNCIL � L3(fyH.LUBth-266-60$� ��N �CRYATfOFNE1' �CISYCLERK NUNBER Pofl M115T6EONCOUNCiLAGENDABY(DAT� S-ZO-9S R �� DGETDIRECTOR �FW.aMGT.SERVICESOi For Public Hearing on 6-24-98 ��OR(OflASSiSTAM) OCouncil Research TOiAl,eOFSIGNANREPAGES i (CLLPAIILOCAiIONSFORSIGNATUR@ �ASSOCNiE A � EMAIACCWNTAM OGTqN AEWESTED - � y Reconstruct Sidewalk in Ward 3(See attached list) � o��R Q►�f �o�-�eR wR]}�ER �IxU�rDN �(Z�fl� 'TU� 7 /4s fl �� N'=� PERSONALSERVICECOMRACTSMUSTANSWERTHEWLLOWING�UESTIONS: _PLANNWG CAMMISSION _ GNIL SEfiVICE COMMISSION 7• F1d5 @tl^+ P� � NO ef WOIkBd �ndef d COlIVdC[ (of ihi5 dBparQtta�t? YE CIB CoMMR7EE _ 2. Has �his �ES � NO ef been a ciry employee? A STAFf 3- Daes this person/firm possess a skill not normally possessed by any wrrent ciry empioyee? DISTRICT WUNCIL YES NO SUPPOATS wF1iCH CAUNGL OBJEC7NET �plain all yes afYwers on separate sheet a�ul altath io grben shaet INITIATING PA081EM. ISSUE. OPPORiUNIT' (WHO, WHAT. WHEN, WHERE, WHV): The problem "defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, aHernating freerthaw cycles, service 1'rfe limits, chemicaf additives, ex[reme temperature variations, etc. These problems oxur on a citywide levef and must be addressed and corracted on an ann�al basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it woufd be rendered unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations. ADVANTAGES IF APPflOVED: The commun@y wil{ benefit from this project because it wi{4 provide safe detect tree sidewalks for its many citizens. The sidewalk crontracts are axecuted 6y Qrivate contractors, so R follows that private sector jobs are created as a resuft of this activity. DISADVANTAGES IF APPAOVED: Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment. Simpiy stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it stili remains comroversial. DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPflOVEO: . This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal injury suits, uRimately resulting in the expenditure of larger doliar amounts in eventuai repairs and/or replacement, as well as claim payouts. TOTALAMIXIMOFTHANSACTIONS �],90J,HH COST/pEVENUEBU�GETED(CIRCLEONE) YES No FUNDINGSWRCE 9$"M A, PIA 98 = 6�8�� ACINITYNUMBER C 8-21' j-0 8 FINANCIAL INFOFMATION: (EXPUIIM B t AST = 325 000 C, Cis g8 = 50;000 CTTY OF 5T. PAUL �ISAL ORDER 4R1G1NAl 39 CO CIL FIL O. q S�(e � Co sY /�2L�� /`�Zl� r FILE NO. 598079 VOTING WARD 3 In the Matter of 598079 - Sidewalk reconstruction on both sides Jefferson Avenue from South Fairview Avenue to South Prior Avenue. Laid over from 6/24/98 �`p�to�lr�c� ��t r "� C �1 S�'/l�( c � �� V �jjtL G� �� under Preliminary Order 98-437 approved May 20. 1998 The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as �rescribed by the City Charter; and WHSREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and � recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter_ COUNCII.,PERSONS Yeas Nays Benanav Blakey Bostrom Coleman Harris Lantry Reiter � Adopted by Council: Date Certified Passed by Council Secretary _In Favor _Against � Mayor Public Hearing Date - June 24, 1 „ o�rnnna�r+rrocF�,�ouNCa Pubt'�c Works Sidewalks COMACT PERSON 8 PHONE Larry H. Lueth - 266-6083 MUSTBEONCOUI�CLLAGENDABY(DA'!� S��LO�SS For Public Hearing on 6-24-98 TOTAL t OF SIQlUNHE PAGES�^�_ � p 1 �_ �8-98 GREEN SHEET WI71Ai/DATE A7TDpNEY `_ Q Maroa �oa ass�sraNr� (CLIP ALL LOCA7IONS FOk SIGWTUR� n ASSOCIATE Recanstruct Sidewalk in Ward 3(See attached Gs2_ ) _ � � �� tA OY�R $f �fWNU� �6�, Wl� �EP �Ix ylf COAIMR7EE CouNCIL oBJECTNE9 (�N 0.�9�i�M' MRIAClDA'(� � crn ca,HC+c �Y -ta � CRYCLERK � FW. f MGi. SERV7CES Dfq. ] Counal Resea A � NTALACCWNi � �$ PEHSONAI SERVICE COMRACTS MU5T ANSWER THE FOLLOWIN6 CUESTIONS: t. Has this persorvfi NOer worked under a convact (w this deparonent7 Y Z � m � YES � NO er been a ary employee? 3. Ooes this persoNfirm possess a sMii nat namdty possessetl by any current dry employee? � NO Expiatn ali yas answera on saparata sheet and altaeh to grvan ahaat ITIATWG AA06LEA1, 195UE, OPAL7FTUN7TY (N'HO, NNA7 WNEN, WHEAE. WNY): The problem "detective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, altemating freerthaw cycies, service I'rfe limits, chemical addftives, eMreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a crtywide level and must be addressed and correctad on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk cond'Rion would worsen to a state whera it would be rendered unusable and subjed to increased pedesVian injuries from falls and possible I'rtigations. The community witt benefit from this project because it wiii provide safe detect hes sidewatks ior its many cBizens. The sidewatk contracts are executed by private contractors, so it to(fows that private sector jobs are created as a resuft of this adivity. Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment. Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it still remains controversial. This option would allow the infrastructure ot sidewalk stock to deferiorate, whkh in turn, wil! generale more personal injury sufts, uRimatety resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounTS in eventual repairs and/or repfacemenT, as well as cfaim payou[s. TOTAI. AMOUM OF TiUNSACfION S FUNOINGSWRCE 98�f'� Fwu+cuw wcoFUVaroN: �zPUiM PIA 98 = AST a C, C!8 98 = 50,000 COSTIREVEMUE BUDCETED (CIRCLE ONE) acmmNUeeeeA C98-2T757-I 0 e CITY OF ST. PAUL FINAL ORDER t��tA�. � FILE NO. 598079 VOTING WARD 3 In the Matter of 598079 - Sidewalk reconstruction on both sides Jefferson Avenue from South Fairview Avenue to South Prior Avenue. A �C'i�e.rdw.cr�T � �\C-'YhoV�� d�¢c\' O� Y�eCOV+S�cv,�! fa � � �i��qa o . � 8' s o o �,a Rv ��.�-e .. Laid over from 6/24J98 under Preliminary Order 98-437 approved May 20. 1998 The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WAEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays ✓ Blakey - P�s�r� ✓Bostrom � ✓ Cc�leman - Pb�� Harris ✓Lantry �iter S In Favor � Against a ��a� - ��j�� 39 co czL g=L a. Q8-G�l� a BY � Adopted by Council: Date �°�� Certified Passed by Council Secretary Mayor �' �.,. ;, Public Hearing Date — June 24, 1998 RE 5-8-98 � !��►I� °EP °A �'"'�"� D GREEN SHEET No. �� Public Works Sidewaiks 4-3-98 wmawAre wRUwn C:�NTAGT PERSON a PFIONE pEPApTMENT DIRECTOA � CiTY CAUNCIL � L3(fyH.LUBth-266-60$� ��N �CRYATfOFNE1' �CISYCLERK NUNBER Pofl M115T6EONCOUNCiLAGENDABY(DAT� S-ZO-9S R �� DGETDIRECTOR �FW.aMGT.SERVICESOi For Public Hearing on 6-24-98 ��OR(OflASSiSTAM) OCouncil Research TOiAl,eOFSIGNANREPAGES i (CLLPAIILOCAiIONSFORSIGNATUR@ �ASSOCNiE A � EMAIACCWNTAM OGTqN AEWESTED - � y Reconstruct Sidewalk in Ward 3(See attached list) � o��R Q►�f �o�-�eR wR]}�ER �IxU�rDN �(Z�fl� 'TU� 7 /4s fl �� N'=� PERSONALSERVICECOMRACTSMUSTANSWERTHEWLLOWING�UESTIONS: _PLANNWG CAMMISSION _ GNIL SEfiVICE COMMISSION 7• F1d5 @tl^+ P� � NO ef WOIkBd �ndef d COlIVdC[ (of ihi5 dBparQtta�t? YE CIB CoMMR7EE _ 2. Has �his �ES � NO ef been a ciry employee? A STAFf 3- Daes this person/firm possess a skill not normally possessed by any wrrent ciry empioyee? DISTRICT WUNCIL YES NO SUPPOATS wF1iCH CAUNGL OBJEC7NET �plain all yes afYwers on separate sheet a�ul altath io grben shaet INITIATING PA081EM. ISSUE. OPPORiUNIT' (WHO, WHAT. WHEN, WHERE, WHV): The problem "defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, aHernating freerthaw cycles, service 1'rfe limits, chemicaf additives, ex[reme temperature variations, etc. These problems oxur on a citywide levef and must be addressed and corracted on an ann�al basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it woufd be rendered unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations. ADVANTAGES IF APPflOVED: The commun@y wil{ benefit from this project because it wi{4 provide safe detect tree sidewalks for its many citizens. The sidewalk crontracts are axecuted 6y Qrivate contractors, so R follows that private sector jobs are created as a resuft of this activity. DISADVANTAGES IF APPAOVED: Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment. Simpiy stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it stili remains comroversial. DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPflOVEO: . This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal injury suits, uRimately resulting in the expenditure of larger doliar amounts in eventuai repairs and/or replacement, as well as claim payouts. TOTALAMIXIMOFTHANSACTIONS �],90J,HH COST/pEVENUEBU�GETED(CIRCLEONE) YES No FUNDINGSWRCE 9$"M A, PIA 98 = 6�8�� ACINITYNUMBER C 8-21' j-0 8 FINANCIAL INFOFMATION: (EXPUIIM B t AST = 325 000 C, Cis g8 = 50;000 CTTY OF 5T. PAUL �ISAL ORDER 4R1G1NAl 39 CO CIL FIL O. q S�(e � Co sY /�2L�� /`�Zl� r FILE NO. 598079 VOTING WARD 3 In the Matter of 598079 - Sidewalk reconstruction on both sides Jefferson Avenue from South Fairview Avenue to South Prior Avenue. Laid over from 6/24/98 �`p�to�lr�c� ��t r "� C �1 S�'/l�( c � �� V �jjtL G� �� under Preliminary Order 98-437 approved May 20. 1998 The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as �rescribed by the City Charter; and WHSREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and � recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter_ COUNCII.,PERSONS Yeas Nays Benanav Blakey Bostrom Coleman Harris Lantry Reiter � Adopted by Council: Date Certified Passed by Council Secretary _In Favor _Against � Mayor Public Hearing Date - June 24, 1 „ o�rnnna�r+rrocF�,�ouNCa Pubt'�c Works Sidewalks COMACT PERSON 8 PHONE Larry H. Lueth - 266-6083 MUSTBEONCOUI�CLLAGENDABY(DA'!� S��LO�SS For Public Hearing on 6-24-98 TOTAL t OF SIQlUNHE PAGES�^�_ � p 1 �_ �8-98 GREEN SHEET WI71Ai/DATE A7TDpNEY `_ Q Maroa �oa ass�sraNr� (CLIP ALL LOCA7IONS FOk SIGWTUR� n ASSOCIATE Recanstruct Sidewalk in Ward 3(See attached Gs2_ ) _ � � �� tA OY�R $f �fWNU� �6�, Wl� �EP �Ix ylf COAIMR7EE CouNCIL oBJECTNE9 (�N 0.�9�i�M' MRIAClDA'(� � crn ca,HC+c �Y -ta � CRYCLERK � FW. f MGi. SERV7CES Dfq. ] Counal Resea A � NTALACCWNi � �$ PEHSONAI SERVICE COMRACTS MU5T ANSWER THE FOLLOWIN6 CUESTIONS: t. Has this persorvfi NOer worked under a convact (w this deparonent7 Y Z � m � YES � NO er been a ary employee? 3. Ooes this persoNfirm possess a sMii nat namdty possessetl by any current dry employee? � NO Expiatn ali yas answera on saparata sheet and altaeh to grvan ahaat ITIATWG AA06LEA1, 195UE, OPAL7FTUN7TY (N'HO, NNA7 WNEN, WHEAE. WNY): The problem "detective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, altemating freerthaw cycies, service I'rfe limits, chemical addftives, eMreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a crtywide level and must be addressed and correctad on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk cond'Rion would worsen to a state whera it would be rendered unusable and subjed to increased pedesVian injuries from falls and possible I'rtigations. The community witt benefit from this project because it wiii provide safe detect hes sidewatks ior its many cBizens. The sidewatk contracts are executed by private contractors, so it to(fows that private sector jobs are created as a resuft of this adivity. Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment. Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it still remains controversial. This option would allow the infrastructure ot sidewalk stock to deferiorate, whkh in turn, wil! generale more personal injury sufts, uRimatety resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounTS in eventual repairs and/or repfacemenT, as well as cfaim payou[s. TOTAI. AMOUM OF TiUNSACfION S FUNOINGSWRCE 98�f'� Fwu+cuw wcoFUVaroN: �zPUiM PIA 98 = AST a C, C!8 98 = 50,000 COSTIREVEMUE BUDCETED (CIRCLE ONE) acmmNUeeeeA C98-2T757-I 0 e