Loading...
98-605CITY OF ST. PAUL FTNAL ORDER In the Matter of ��tG�H�t�. yo CO L ILE N. � FJ " G �S BY� I �! ��l1%�' �'v J --TT° FILE NO. 598055. 598057 & 598060 VOTING WARD 3 598055 - Sidewalk reconstruction on both sides of Lincoln Avenue from South Syndicate Street to approximately 360 feet east of South Syndicate Street. S98057 - Sidewalk reconstruction on both sides of Osceola Avenue from South Snelling Avenue to South Saratoga Street and the west side of South Saratoga Street from Fairmount Avenue to Osceola Avenue. 598060 - Sidewalk reconstruction on the north side of St. Clair Avenue from South Saratoga Street to South Pascal Street and the south side of St. Clair Avenue from Warwick Street to South Pascal Street. Laid over from 6/24/98 under Preliminary Order 98-432 approved Ma� 20. 1998 The Council of the City of Saint Pau1 has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all e�enses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays Benanav a- (��pS�,,.� Blakey — ��,� ���- P/�ostrom v�oleman S In �avor �Iiarris ✓�antry C5 Against ,il�eiter Adopted by Council: Date � Certified Passed by Council Se etazy Public Works Sidewalks Date — June 24, 1998 irry H. Lueth - 266-6083 ISTBEONCOUNCILAGENDABY(DA7� S-'ZO-IH For Public Hearing on 6-24-98 RAL s OF SIGNANHE PAGES �` ls_ _� ;T�N FiEQUESTED Reconstruct Sidewalk in Ward 3(See attached JNl� OV�tt � �NU�i�- F9R � PLANNINCaCAMMISS�ON CfB COMMITiEE STAFF WHICFI CWNCIL O&IECTNE? RE 5-8-98 � t, � DATEINI7IATED GREEN SHEET�NO.�� 4-17-98 �Ninauonre _ uairwware_, x�a"Enwe ❑cmarroauev q� �BUDGEiD7PECS� ALL LOGATONS FOR SIGNATUR� ihis rssocw� co�nvc� c�.sau E MGi. SERYIC�S tr�zyl� �rD MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS: under a comract fu fiis deparlment? CAMMISSION 2 � 5 m � YES � NO er baen a ciry employee? 3. Daes ihis pecsoNfirm Mssess a skill not normally possessed by any cunent ciry employea? YES NO Explain all yes answors on separate shaet and attaeh to green sheet The problem "defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, alternating ireeRhaw cycles, servica I'rfe lim8s, chemical additives, eMreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide tevel and must be addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it woufd be rendered unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries irom falls and possible Iitigations. ADYANTAGESIFAPPROVED: The community wiU benefit from this project because it wifl provide safe detect free sidewalks for its many citizens. The sidawalk contracts are executed by private contractors, so ii fofiows that private sector jobs are created as a result of this activity. DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED: Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment. Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-halfi the assessment is City subsidized, it still remains controversial. This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal injury suits, ul[imately resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in eventual repairs and/or replacement, as well as claim payouts. iOTALAMWNTOFTHANSACTIONS Z s COSTIp£VEP7l1EBUDGETED(CIRCLEONEj FUNDINGSOUHCE 9a��'} � _ �000 pCITVRYNUMBER C9$-2T]S�'� FINANC�AL �NFORMATION: (EXPLAIN) � ' � C, CIB 98 = 50,000 NO CITY OF ST. PAUL FTNAL ORDER In the Matter of ��tG�H�t�. yo CO L ILE N. � FJ " G �S BY� I �! ��l1%�' �'v J --TT° FILE NO. 598055. 598057 & 598060 VOTING WARD 3 598055 - Sidewalk reconstruction on both sides of Lincoln Avenue from South Syndicate Street to approximately 360 feet east of South Syndicate Street. S98057 - Sidewalk reconstruction on both sides of Osceola Avenue from South Snelling Avenue to South Saratoga Street and the west side of South Saratoga Street from Fairmount Avenue to Osceola Avenue. 598060 - Sidewalk reconstruction on the north side of St. Clair Avenue from South Saratoga Street to South Pascal Street and the south side of St. Clair Avenue from Warwick Street to South Pascal Street. Laid over from 6/24/98 under Preliminary Order 98-432 approved Ma� 20. 1998 The Council of the City of Saint Pau1 has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all e�enses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays Benanav a- (��pS�,,.� Blakey — ��,� ���- P/�ostrom v�oleman S In �avor �Iiarris ✓�antry C5 Against ,il�eiter Adopted by Council: Date � Certified Passed by Council Se etazy Public Works Sidewalks Date — June 24, 1998 irry H. Lueth - 266-6083 ISTBEONCOUNCILAGENDABY(DA7� S-'ZO-IH For Public Hearing on 6-24-98 RAL s OF SIGNANHE PAGES �` ls_ _� ;T�N FiEQUESTED Reconstruct Sidewalk in Ward 3(See attached JNl� OV�tt � �NU�i�- F9R � PLANNINCaCAMMISS�ON CfB COMMITiEE STAFF WHICFI CWNCIL O&IECTNE? RE 5-8-98 � t, � DATEINI7IATED GREEN SHEET�NO.�� 4-17-98 �Ninauonre _ uairwware_, x�a"Enwe ❑cmarroauev q� �BUDGEiD7PECS� ALL LOGATONS FOR SIGNATUR� ihis rssocw� co�nvc� c�.sau E MGi. SERYIC�S tr�zyl� �rD MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS: under a comract fu fiis deparlment? CAMMISSION 2 � 5 m � YES � NO er baen a ciry employee? 3. Daes ihis pecsoNfirm Mssess a skill not normally possessed by any cunent ciry employea? YES NO Explain all yes answors on separate shaet and attaeh to green sheet The problem "defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, alternating ireeRhaw cycles, servica I'rfe lim8s, chemical additives, eMreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide tevel and must be addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it woufd be rendered unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries irom falls and possible Iitigations. ADYANTAGESIFAPPROVED: The community wiU benefit from this project because it wifl provide safe detect free sidewalks for its many citizens. The sidawalk contracts are executed by private contractors, so ii fofiows that private sector jobs are created as a result of this activity. DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED: Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment. Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-halfi the assessment is City subsidized, it still remains controversial. This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal injury suits, ul[imately resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in eventual repairs and/or replacement, as well as claim payouts. iOTALAMWNTOFTHANSACTIONS Z s COSTIp£VEP7l1EBUDGETED(CIRCLEONEj FUNDINGSOUHCE 9a��'} � _ �000 pCITVRYNUMBER C9$-2T]S�'� FINANC�AL �NFORMATION: (EXPLAIN) � ' � C, CIB 98 = 50,000 NO CITY OF ST. PAUL FTNAL ORDER In the Matter of ��tG�H�t�. yo CO L ILE N. � FJ " G �S BY� I �! ��l1%�' �'v J --TT° FILE NO. 598055. 598057 & 598060 VOTING WARD 3 598055 - Sidewalk reconstruction on both sides of Lincoln Avenue from South Syndicate Street to approximately 360 feet east of South Syndicate Street. S98057 - Sidewalk reconstruction on both sides of Osceola Avenue from South Snelling Avenue to South Saratoga Street and the west side of South Saratoga Street from Fairmount Avenue to Osceola Avenue. 598060 - Sidewalk reconstruction on the north side of St. Clair Avenue from South Saratoga Street to South Pascal Street and the south side of St. Clair Avenue from Warwick Street to South Pascal Street. Laid over from 6/24/98 under Preliminary Order 98-432 approved Ma� 20. 1998 The Council of the City of Saint Pau1 has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all e�enses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays Benanav a- (��pS�,,.� Blakey — ��,� ���- P/�ostrom v�oleman S In �avor �Iiarris ✓�antry C5 Against ,il�eiter Adopted by Council: Date � Certified Passed by Council Se etazy Public Works Sidewalks Date — June 24, 1998 irry H. Lueth - 266-6083 ISTBEONCOUNCILAGENDABY(DA7� S-'ZO-IH For Public Hearing on 6-24-98 RAL s OF SIGNANHE PAGES �` ls_ _� ;T�N FiEQUESTED Reconstruct Sidewalk in Ward 3(See attached JNl� OV�tt � �NU�i�- F9R � PLANNINCaCAMMISS�ON CfB COMMITiEE STAFF WHICFI CWNCIL O&IECTNE? RE 5-8-98 � t, � DATEINI7IATED GREEN SHEET�NO.�� 4-17-98 �Ninauonre _ uairwware_, x�a"Enwe ❑cmarroauev q� �BUDGEiD7PECS� ALL LOGATONS FOR SIGNATUR� ihis rssocw� co�nvc� c�.sau E MGi. SERYIC�S tr�zyl� �rD MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS: under a comract fu fiis deparlment? CAMMISSION 2 � 5 m � YES � NO er baen a ciry employee? 3. Daes ihis pecsoNfirm Mssess a skill not normally possessed by any cunent ciry employea? YES NO Explain all yes answors on separate shaet and attaeh to green sheet The problem "defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, alternating ireeRhaw cycles, servica I'rfe lim8s, chemical additives, eMreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide tevel and must be addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it woufd be rendered unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries irom falls and possible Iitigations. ADYANTAGESIFAPPROVED: The community wiU benefit from this project because it wifl provide safe detect free sidewalks for its many citizens. The sidawalk contracts are executed by private contractors, so ii fofiows that private sector jobs are created as a result of this activity. DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED: Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment. Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-halfi the assessment is City subsidized, it still remains controversial. This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal injury suits, ul[imately resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in eventual repairs and/or replacement, as well as claim payouts. iOTALAMWNTOFTHANSACTIONS Z s COSTIp£VEP7l1EBUDGETED(CIRCLEONEj FUNDINGSOUHCE 9a��'} � _ �000 pCITVRYNUMBER C9$-2T]S�'� FINANC�AL �NFORMATION: (EXPLAIN) � ' � C, CIB 98 = 50,000 NO