The URL can be used to link to this page

98-6043q ;�4��i��`1�7�:21��J FINAL ORDER BY�C �__�� q g- G o� FILE NO. S98048 VOTII3G WARD 6 Ia the Matter of 598048 - Sidewalk reconstruction both sides Forest Street from East Cook Avenue to East Jessamine Avenue and the north side East Cook Avenue from Mendota Street to Forest Street. A O.G�t'GSSc�S Qt'C : 1 OS � Foret'{ S'�'. Laid over from 6/24/98 Io� � rrore:} s� . 9�s �.c�ek A��. under Preliminary Order 98-430 approved Mav 20, 1998 The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Counci3 of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby direcCed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays Benanav °-- �`P s��r�� BlakeY — ��ser�f ✓Bostrom �oleman �In Favor ✓f�arri s Adopted by Council: Date�j�� \ Certified Passed by Council Secretary :/Gantry � Against �iter a ,/� _ 1'-��Szv�� Public Hearing I EPAflT7AENT/OFFICE/CDUNCIL 'ublic Works Sidewalks ONfACi PEASON 6 PFI�NE arry H. Lueth - 26&608: U5T BE ON COUNCIL AGENDA E For Public Heari �TAL t OF S{GNATUHE PAGE$ — June 24 i � A � 5-20-98 iQ on 6-24-98 GREEN SHEET iNmaware DEPAFTMENTOIRECTOR CINATTOqNEY BUOGET DIPECTOH MAYOH (OR ASSISTANT) FOR SiGNATUNE) �� ASSOCIATE �r I• - ------ & MGT. ACCWN'fAt�R Reconstruct Sidewalk in Ward 2(See attached list) `" �� p� �f �f� �� fVRT�J� �iV5�a�1 61�1� TO 7�g 7�i� -- y n��, ta�.��r ►D? t FGI�iT `�- f 15 � coox IECAMMENDATIDNS:tppmve(lqorRej9tY(F� pEHSO LSEHVICECONfRACTSMUSTANSWERTHEFOLLOWINGQUESTIONS: � PLANNING COMM�SSION CNR SERVICE COMMISSION i. Has Ihis pefson/firtn eVer worked undM a conUac[ fot Ihis departrnBn[? C18 CAN6(fifEE STARF O&IECTNE7 2. Has this pES Nfi Ne been a dty employee? Y 3. Dces this persaNfirm possass a skill not normally possessed by arry wrrent ciry empbyee? YES NO Ezplain ali yes answers on saparate shoet and aitaoh to green sheat ITInTING Pf209lEM. ISSUE, OPPOqNNITY (WHO, WHAT, WHEN, WHERE, WHY): - - � The problem "defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, aflernating freefthaw cycles, service lifa limits, chemical additives, eMreme tempecature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide levef and must be addressed and crorrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrecled, the sidewalk condition woufd worsen to a state where it woutd be rendered unusable and subjed to increased pedestrian injuries from fails and possible litigations. The community wi{I benefit Srom this project because it wilf provide saTe detect free sidewaiks for its many citizens. The sidewalk wntracts are executed by private contractors, so fl follows that private sector jobs are created as a result ofi this activity. HisWrically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment. Simply stated, property owners detesi assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it still remains controversial. �ADVANTAGES IF NOT APPflOVE�: This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stxk to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more persoaal injury suits, uRimately resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in eventual repairs andlor replacement, as well as claim payouts. OF TRANSACTION S COSTlREVENUE BUDGETED (CIRCLE ONE� YES No FUNDINGSOURCE 98-M-o668 A� Yl'q 9tS -i'. 67�5�000 q�y7VITYN�MHEA FINANCIALINFORMATVON:(EXPLA4N) � = 32 C, Ct8 98 = 50,000 3q ;�4��i��`1�7�:21��J FINAL ORDER BY�C �__�� q g- G o� FILE NO. S98048 VOTII3G WARD 6 Ia the Matter of 598048 - Sidewalk reconstruction both sides Forest Street from East Cook Avenue to East Jessamine Avenue and the north side East Cook Avenue from Mendota Street to Forest Street. A O.G�t'GSSc�S Qt'C : 1 OS � Foret'{ S'�'. Laid over from 6/24/98 Io� � rrore:} s� . 9�s �.c�ek A��. under Preliminary Order 98-430 approved Mav 20, 1998 The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Counci3 of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby direcCed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays Benanav °-- �`P s��r�� BlakeY — ��ser�f ✓Bostrom �oleman �In Favor ✓f�arri s Adopted by Council: Date�j�� \ Certified Passed by Council Secretary :/Gantry � Against �iter a ,/� _ 1'-��Szv�� Public Hearing I EPAflT7AENT/OFFICE/CDUNCIL 'ublic Works Sidewalks ONfACi PEASON 6 PFI�NE arry H. Lueth - 26&608: U5T BE ON COUNCIL AGENDA E For Public Heari �TAL t OF S{GNATUHE PAGE$ — June 24 i � A � 5-20-98 iQ on 6-24-98 GREEN SHEET iNmaware DEPAFTMENTOIRECTOR CINATTOqNEY BUOGET DIPECTOH MAYOH (OR ASSISTANT) FOR SiGNATUNE) �� ASSOCIATE �r I• - ------ & MGT. ACCWN'fAt�R Reconstruct Sidewalk in Ward 2(See attached list) `" �� p� �f �f� �� fVRT�J� �iV5�a�1 61�1� TO 7�g 7�i� -- y n��, ta�.��r ►D? t FGI�iT `�- f 15 � coox IECAMMENDATIDNS:tppmve(lqorRej9tY(F� pEHSO LSEHVICECONfRACTSMUSTANSWERTHEFOLLOWINGQUESTIONS: � PLANNING COMM�SSION CNR SERVICE COMMISSION i. Has Ihis pefson/firtn eVer worked undM a conUac[ fot Ihis departrnBn[? C18 CAN6(fifEE STARF O&IECTNE7 2. Has this pES Nfi Ne been a dty employee? Y 3. Dces this persaNfirm possass a skill not normally possessed by arry wrrent ciry empbyee? YES NO Ezplain ali yes answers on saparate shoet and aitaoh to green sheat ITInTING Pf209lEM. ISSUE, OPPOqNNITY (WHO, WHAT, WHEN, WHERE, WHY): - - � The problem "defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, aflernating freefthaw cycles, service lifa limits, chemical additives, eMreme tempecature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide levef and must be addressed and crorrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrecled, the sidewalk condition woufd worsen to a state where it woutd be rendered unusable and subjed to increased pedestrian injuries from fails and possible litigations. The community wi{I benefit Srom this project because it wilf provide saTe detect free sidewaiks for its many citizens. The sidewalk wntracts are executed by private contractors, so fl follows that private sector jobs are created as a result ofi this activity. HisWrically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment. Simply stated, property owners detesi assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it still remains controversial. �ADVANTAGES IF NOT APPflOVE�: This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stxk to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more persoaal injury suits, uRimately resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in eventual repairs andlor replacement, as well as claim payouts. OF TRANSACTION S COSTlREVENUE BUDGETED (CIRCLE ONE� YES No FUNDINGSOURCE 98-M-o668 A� Yl'q 9tS -i'. 67�5�000 q�y7VITYN�MHEA FINANCIALINFORMATVON:(EXPLA4N) � = 32 C, Ct8 98 = 50,000 3q ;�4��i��`1�7�:21��J FINAL ORDER BY�C �__�� q g- G o� FILE NO. S98048 VOTII3G WARD 6 Ia the Matter of 598048 - Sidewalk reconstruction both sides Forest Street from East Cook Avenue to East Jessamine Avenue and the north side East Cook Avenue from Mendota Street to Forest Street. A O.G�t'GSSc�S Qt'C : 1 OS � Foret'{ S'�'. Laid over from 6/24/98 Io� � rrore:} s� . 9�s �.c�ek A��. under Preliminary Order 98-430 approved Mav 20, 1998 The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Counci3 of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby direcCed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays Benanav °-- �`P s��r�� BlakeY — ��ser�f ✓Bostrom �oleman �In Favor ✓f�arri s Adopted by Council: Date�j�� \ Certified Passed by Council Secretary :/Gantry � Against �iter a ,/� _ 1'-��Szv�� Public Hearing I EPAflT7AENT/OFFICE/CDUNCIL 'ublic Works Sidewalks ONfACi PEASON 6 PFI�NE arry H. Lueth - 26&608: U5T BE ON COUNCIL AGENDA E For Public Heari �TAL t OF S{GNATUHE PAGE$ — June 24 i � A � 5-20-98 iQ on 6-24-98 GREEN SHEET iNmaware DEPAFTMENTOIRECTOR CINATTOqNEY BUOGET DIPECTOH MAYOH (OR ASSISTANT) FOR SiGNATUNE) �� ASSOCIATE �r I• - ------ & MGT. ACCWN'fAt�R Reconstruct Sidewalk in Ward 2(See attached list) `" �� p� �f �f� �� fVRT�J� �iV5�a�1 61�1� TO 7�g 7�i� -- y n��, ta�.��r ►D? t FGI�iT `�- f 15 � coox IECAMMENDATIDNS:tppmve(lqorRej9tY(F� pEHSO LSEHVICECONfRACTSMUSTANSWERTHEFOLLOWINGQUESTIONS: � PLANNING COMM�SSION CNR SERVICE COMMISSION i. Has Ihis pefson/firtn eVer worked undM a conUac[ fot Ihis departrnBn[? C18 CAN6(fifEE STARF O&IECTNE7 2. Has this pES Nfi Ne been a dty employee? Y 3. Dces this persaNfirm possass a skill not normally possessed by arry wrrent ciry empbyee? YES NO Ezplain ali yes answers on saparate shoet and aitaoh to green sheat ITInTING Pf209lEM. ISSUE, OPPOqNNITY (WHO, WHAT, WHEN, WHERE, WHY): - - � The problem "defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, aflernating freefthaw cycles, service lifa limits, chemical additives, eMreme tempecature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide levef and must be addressed and crorrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrecled, the sidewalk condition woufd worsen to a state where it woutd be rendered unusable and subjed to increased pedestrian injuries from fails and possible litigations. The community wi{I benefit Srom this project because it wilf provide saTe detect free sidewaiks for its many citizens. The sidewalk wntracts are executed by private contractors, so fl follows that private sector jobs are created as a result ofi this activity. HisWrically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment. Simply stated, property owners detesi assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it still remains controversial. �ADVANTAGES IF NOT APPflOVE�: This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stxk to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more persoaal injury suits, uRimately resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in eventual repairs andlor replacement, as well as claim payouts. OF TRANSACTION S COSTlREVENUE BUDGETED (CIRCLE ONE� YES No FUNDINGSOURCE 98-M-o668 A� Yl'q 9tS -i'. 67�5�000 q�y7VITYN�MHEA FINANCIALINFORMATVON:(EXPLA4N) � = 32 C, Ct8 98 = 50,000