The URL can be used to link to this page

98-579CITY OF ST. PAtJL �� COUN L EILE tp �5�9 �,5 FINAL ORDER � �a`�,�� g r Fil No. 59$082 thru 598084 Vot'ng Ward 5 In the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction at the folloming lacations: 598Q82 - North side W Rose Ave from Farrington St to Virginia St West side Farrinqton St from W Rose Ave to W Maryland Ave and West side Earrington St from W Geranium Ave to W Rose Ave S98083 - North side W Rose Ave from Matilda St to Albemarle St South side W Rose Ave from Matilda St to Woodbridge St and �� Woodbridge St from W Rose Ave to W Maryland Ave J bo 598084 - Both sides Virginia St from W Jessamine Ave to W Rose Ave q8-S�q *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement o£ old sidewalk) -$7.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk anfl 59.18 per front foot £or a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 1000 of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.42 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.62 per square foot. under Preliminary order �� approved c� e � The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a pub ic hearinq upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WAEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has £ully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays Benanav �-- (�bs��.j � akey ✓�ostrom ✓Co 1 eman �rris �antry �iter �Sr, 0 Ag \ Adopted by Council: Date a, �4� Certified Passed by Counc 1 Secretary or ?ublic Hearing Date - June 24,_1998 RE 5-8-98 DEPAfliMENT/OFFICEICAUNCIL DA7EfNRIATED GREEN SHEET r,o.� Public Works Sidewalks 4-��-9g INITIAUDATE 1NfilAVDATE WNTACTPEFSON&PHONE ❑DEPAflTMENTDIflECTOR �CfIYCOUNCIL � � LarryH.Lueth-266-6083 ^��N ❑CITYATTOANEY QCffYCiFAK NUMBFA FOR MUSTBEONCOUNCILAGENOABY(DA7E) 5-20-98 p � �gUDGETDIflECTOR QFIN.BMGT.SEflVICESDIR. For Public Hearing on b-24-98 []�+nvoaroAASSisv�rrt� QCoundl Ressarch TO7AL i' OF SIGNANflE PADES I. _(CLIP ALL LOCA710N5 FOR SIGNATURE7 � ASSOCIRTE � DEPAR71AENiAt AGCOUNT ACTIONFEWESTED /7� , Reconstsuct Sidewalk in Ward 5(See attached list) °� REC�IMENDATbNS: Apprwe (A) w Rejeu (P) PERSONAL SERVICE CANTRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS: PIANNING COMMISSION _ GML SERVICE COMMISSION �� m� �ES� NOef worked under a contrac[ for ih�s departrnent? cis cOMMrtTEE 2. Has ihis personlfirm ever been a ciry employee? — — YES NO A s7AFF 3. Does tltis persoNfirm possess a skill not normaly p0.ssessed by any cuRen[ ciry — — employee? p�57qIC7WUDICU_ YES NO SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL 06JECTNE? F•xP�ain all yes enswets on separate Sheet and attach to gfaon sheet INITIATING PR08LEM, ISSUE, OPPORNNITY (WHO. WHAT, WHEN. WHERE. WHY): The problem "defective sidewalk" was created because ofi tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, aRernating freerthaw cycles, service I'rfe limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide leve! and must be addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewaik condBion would worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations. ADVANTAGESIFAPPROVED; The community will benefit from this project because it wi0 provide safe detect free sidewalks for its many citizens. The sidewafk conVacts are executed by Qrivate contractors, so d follows that private sector jobs are created as a resuR of this activity. DISADVANTAGES IF APPROYED: Hisiorically, the sidewalk recronstructions have created negative feedback in the area of consiruc[ion procedure and assessment. Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it sti11 remains controversial. DISADVAMAGES IF NOT APPROVED: This option would allow the infrastrueture of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal injury suits, uRimately resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in eventual repairs and/or replacemarvT, ofaim payouts. �� rt#et P�Y�� TOTALAIMOUNTOFTRANSACTWN$ 2Q,S�H��2H- _ _ _ COST/REVENUEBUDCETED(CIRCLEONE) YES r+o FUNDINGSWRCE 9$^}� A; f h� 9� a 6a8 pCITVRYNUMBER �98^ FINANCIAL INFORMATION: tEXPLAIN) B r •� AST = 3ZS;OOO , c; cpa 98 = 50,000 ��w...�::-.��.;�__..�_�.�.__.___�:� SUMMAI2Y OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATIONS Ward 5 Il�s� - PROJECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEVPALK N.S. W. ROSE AVE. from Farrington St. to Virguua St., W.S. FARRINGTON ST. from W. Rose Ave. to W. Maryland � �y�Z Ave. & W.S. FARRINGTdN ST. from W. Geranium Ave. to W. Rose Ave. 6WD INTTIATING ACTIOl�i: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of one {1) complaint, a petition with one (1) signer and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches and settled panels. ................................................................... PROJECT: RECO1�iSTRUCT SIDEWALK N.S. W. ROSE AVE. from Matilda St. to Albemarle St., S.S. W. I20SE AVE. from Matilda St. to Woodbridge St. & B.S. WOODBRIDGE ST, from W. Rose Ave. to W. Maryland Ave. IIVITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works ��as public necessity on the basis of two (2) complaints, a petition with one {1J signer and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, scaled, settled and cracked panels. .................................................................. • � � /� / PR03EGT• RECOPTSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. VIRGINI�1 ST. from W. Jessamine Ave. to W. Rose Ave. INITIATING ACTION: as public necessity on walk. This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works the basis of four {4} complaints and an inspection of the EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves> asphalt patches, scaled, settled and cracked panels. ................................................................... 3� CITY OF ST. PAL3I, COUN IL FILE �9� �p �((' � � Q a PRELIMINARY ORDER By File o. S9 082 thru 598084 Voti g Ward 5 In the Matter oE sidewalk zeconstruction at the £ollowing locations: 598082 - North side W Rose Ave from Farrington St to Virginia St West side Farrington St from W Rose Ave to W Maryland Ave and West side Farrington St from W Geranium Ave to W Rose Ave S98083 - North side W Rose Ave Prom Matilda St to Albemarle St South side W Rose Ave from Matilda St to Woodbridge St and West side Woodbridge St £rom W Rose Ave to W Maryland Ave 598084 - Both sides Virginia St £rom W Jessamine Ave to W Rose Ave *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three £amily structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) - 57.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and 59.18 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. Al1 other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� oP the actual cost estimated to be approximately 53.42 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet o£ new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTZ-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100°s of actual cost estimated to be approximately 54.62 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1 2 F3 That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereo£ is *SEE ASOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1998 Public Improvement Aid. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 24th dav of June. 1998 at 5:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Ha11 and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice o£ said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place o£ hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSON5 Yeas Nays � nanav ✓Blakey � strom �267eman , ��antry �'iter 2 1n Favor �J Against Adopted by Council: Date_�� `�� , Certified Passed by Council Secretary BY -� �a J� 1., _ CITY OF ST. PAtJL �� COUN L EILE tp �5�9 �,5 FINAL ORDER � �a`�,�� g r Fil No. 59$082 thru 598084 Vot'ng Ward 5 In the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction at the folloming lacations: 598Q82 - North side W Rose Ave from Farrington St to Virginia St West side Farrinqton St from W Rose Ave to W Maryland Ave and West side Earrington St from W Geranium Ave to W Rose Ave S98083 - North side W Rose Ave from Matilda St to Albemarle St South side W Rose Ave from Matilda St to Woodbridge St and �� Woodbridge St from W Rose Ave to W Maryland Ave J bo 598084 - Both sides Virginia St from W Jessamine Ave to W Rose Ave q8-S�q *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement o£ old sidewalk) -$7.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk anfl 59.18 per front foot £or a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 1000 of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.42 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.62 per square foot. under Preliminary order �� approved c� e � The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a pub ic hearinq upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WAEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has £ully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays Benanav �-- (�bs��.j � akey ✓�ostrom ✓Co 1 eman �rris �antry �iter �Sr, 0 Ag \ Adopted by Council: Date a, �4� Certified Passed by Counc 1 Secretary or ?ublic Hearing Date - June 24,_1998 RE 5-8-98 DEPAfliMENT/OFFICEICAUNCIL DA7EfNRIATED GREEN SHEET r,o.� Public Works Sidewalks 4-��-9g INITIAUDATE 1NfilAVDATE WNTACTPEFSON&PHONE ❑DEPAflTMENTDIflECTOR �CfIYCOUNCIL � � LarryH.Lueth-266-6083 ^��N ❑CITYATTOANEY QCffYCiFAK NUMBFA FOR MUSTBEONCOUNCILAGENOABY(DA7E) 5-20-98 p � �gUDGETDIflECTOR QFIN.BMGT.SEflVICESDIR. For Public Hearing on b-24-98 []�+nvoaroAASSisv�rrt� QCoundl Ressarch TO7AL i' OF SIGNANflE PADES I. _(CLIP ALL LOCA710N5 FOR SIGNATURE7 � ASSOCIRTE � DEPAR71AENiAt AGCOUNT ACTIONFEWESTED /7� , Reconstsuct Sidewalk in Ward 5(See attached list) °� REC�IMENDATbNS: Apprwe (A) w Rejeu (P) PERSONAL SERVICE CANTRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS: PIANNING COMMISSION _ GML SERVICE COMMISSION �� m� �ES� NOef worked under a contrac[ for ih�s departrnent? cis cOMMrtTEE 2. Has ihis personlfirm ever been a ciry employee? — — YES NO A s7AFF 3. Does tltis persoNfirm possess a skill not normaly p0.ssessed by any cuRen[ ciry — — employee? p�57qIC7WUDICU_ YES NO SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL 06JECTNE? F•xP�ain all yes enswets on separate Sheet and attach to gfaon sheet INITIATING PR08LEM, ISSUE, OPPORNNITY (WHO. WHAT, WHEN. WHERE. WHY): The problem "defective sidewalk" was created because ofi tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, aRernating freerthaw cycles, service I'rfe limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide leve! and must be addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewaik condBion would worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations. ADVANTAGESIFAPPROVED; The community will benefit from this project because it wi0 provide safe detect free sidewalks for its many citizens. The sidewafk conVacts are executed by Qrivate contractors, so d follows that private sector jobs are created as a resuR of this activity. DISADVANTAGES IF APPROYED: Hisiorically, the sidewalk recronstructions have created negative feedback in the area of consiruc[ion procedure and assessment. Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it sti11 remains controversial. DISADVAMAGES IF NOT APPROVED: This option would allow the infrastrueture of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal injury suits, uRimately resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in eventual repairs and/or replacemarvT, ofaim payouts. �� rt#et P�Y�� TOTALAIMOUNTOFTRANSACTWN$ 2Q,S�H��2H- _ _ _ COST/REVENUEBUDCETED(CIRCLEONE) YES r+o FUNDINGSWRCE 9$^}� A; f h� 9� a 6a8 pCITVRYNUMBER �98^ FINANCIAL INFORMATION: tEXPLAIN) B r •� AST = 3ZS;OOO , c; cpa 98 = 50,000 ��w...�::-.��.;�__..�_�.�.__.___�:� SUMMAI2Y OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATIONS Ward 5 Il�s� - PROJECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEVPALK N.S. W. ROSE AVE. from Farrington St. to Virguua St., W.S. FARRINGTON ST. from W. Rose Ave. to W. Maryland � �y�Z Ave. & W.S. FARRINGTdN ST. from W. Geranium Ave. to W. Rose Ave. 6WD INTTIATING ACTIOl�i: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of one {1) complaint, a petition with one (1) signer and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches and settled panels. ................................................................... PROJECT: RECO1�iSTRUCT SIDEWALK N.S. W. ROSE AVE. from Matilda St. to Albemarle St., S.S. W. I20SE AVE. from Matilda St. to Woodbridge St. & B.S. WOODBRIDGE ST, from W. Rose Ave. to W. Maryland Ave. IIVITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works ��as public necessity on the basis of two (2) complaints, a petition with one {1J signer and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, scaled, settled and cracked panels. .................................................................. • � � /� / PR03EGT• RECOPTSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. VIRGINI�1 ST. from W. Jessamine Ave. to W. Rose Ave. INITIATING ACTION: as public necessity on walk. This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works the basis of four {4} complaints and an inspection of the EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves> asphalt patches, scaled, settled and cracked panels. ................................................................... 3� CITY OF ST. PAL3I, COUN IL FILE �9� �p �((' � � Q a PRELIMINARY ORDER By File o. S9 082 thru 598084 Voti g Ward 5 In the Matter oE sidewalk zeconstruction at the £ollowing locations: 598082 - North side W Rose Ave from Farrington St to Virginia St West side Farrington St from W Rose Ave to W Maryland Ave and West side Farrington St from W Geranium Ave to W Rose Ave S98083 - North side W Rose Ave Prom Matilda St to Albemarle St South side W Rose Ave from Matilda St to Woodbridge St and West side Woodbridge St £rom W Rose Ave to W Maryland Ave 598084 - Both sides Virginia St £rom W Jessamine Ave to W Rose Ave *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three £amily structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) - 57.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and 59.18 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. Al1 other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� oP the actual cost estimated to be approximately 53.42 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet o£ new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTZ-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100°s of actual cost estimated to be approximately 54.62 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1 2 F3 That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereo£ is *SEE ASOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1998 Public Improvement Aid. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 24th dav of June. 1998 at 5:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Ha11 and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice o£ said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place o£ hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSON5 Yeas Nays � nanav ✓Blakey � strom �267eman , ��antry �'iter 2 1n Favor �J Against Adopted by Council: Date_�� `�� , Certified Passed by Council Secretary BY -� �a J� 1., _ CITY OF ST. PAtJL �� COUN L EILE tp �5�9 �,5 FINAL ORDER � �a`�,�� g r Fil No. 59$082 thru 598084 Vot'ng Ward 5 In the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction at the folloming lacations: 598Q82 - North side W Rose Ave from Farrington St to Virginia St West side Farrinqton St from W Rose Ave to W Maryland Ave and West side Earrington St from W Geranium Ave to W Rose Ave S98083 - North side W Rose Ave from Matilda St to Albemarle St South side W Rose Ave from Matilda St to Woodbridge St and �� Woodbridge St from W Rose Ave to W Maryland Ave J bo 598084 - Both sides Virginia St from W Jessamine Ave to W Rose Ave q8-S�q *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement o£ old sidewalk) -$7.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk anfl 59.18 per front foot £or a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 1000 of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.42 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.62 per square foot. under Preliminary order �� approved c� e � The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a pub ic hearinq upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WAEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has £ully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays Benanav �-- (�bs��.j � akey ✓�ostrom ✓Co 1 eman �rris �antry �iter �Sr, 0 Ag \ Adopted by Council: Date a, �4� Certified Passed by Counc 1 Secretary or ?ublic Hearing Date - June 24,_1998 RE 5-8-98 DEPAfliMENT/OFFICEICAUNCIL DA7EfNRIATED GREEN SHEET r,o.� Public Works Sidewalks 4-��-9g INITIAUDATE 1NfilAVDATE WNTACTPEFSON&PHONE ❑DEPAflTMENTDIflECTOR �CfIYCOUNCIL � � LarryH.Lueth-266-6083 ^��N ❑CITYATTOANEY QCffYCiFAK NUMBFA FOR MUSTBEONCOUNCILAGENOABY(DA7E) 5-20-98 p � �gUDGETDIflECTOR QFIN.BMGT.SEflVICESDIR. For Public Hearing on b-24-98 []�+nvoaroAASSisv�rrt� QCoundl Ressarch TO7AL i' OF SIGNANflE PADES I. _(CLIP ALL LOCA710N5 FOR SIGNATURE7 � ASSOCIRTE � DEPAR71AENiAt AGCOUNT ACTIONFEWESTED /7� , Reconstsuct Sidewalk in Ward 5(See attached list) °� REC�IMENDATbNS: Apprwe (A) w Rejeu (P) PERSONAL SERVICE CANTRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS: PIANNING COMMISSION _ GML SERVICE COMMISSION �� m� �ES� NOef worked under a contrac[ for ih�s departrnent? cis cOMMrtTEE 2. Has ihis personlfirm ever been a ciry employee? — — YES NO A s7AFF 3. Does tltis persoNfirm possess a skill not normaly p0.ssessed by any cuRen[ ciry — — employee? p�57qIC7WUDICU_ YES NO SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL 06JECTNE? F•xP�ain all yes enswets on separate Sheet and attach to gfaon sheet INITIATING PR08LEM, ISSUE, OPPORNNITY (WHO. WHAT, WHEN. WHERE. WHY): The problem "defective sidewalk" was created because ofi tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, aRernating freerthaw cycles, service I'rfe limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide leve! and must be addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewaik condBion would worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations. ADVANTAGESIFAPPROVED; The community will benefit from this project because it wi0 provide safe detect free sidewalks for its many citizens. The sidewafk conVacts are executed by Qrivate contractors, so d follows that private sector jobs are created as a resuR of this activity. DISADVANTAGES IF APPROYED: Hisiorically, the sidewalk recronstructions have created negative feedback in the area of consiruc[ion procedure and assessment. Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it sti11 remains controversial. DISADVAMAGES IF NOT APPROVED: This option would allow the infrastrueture of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal injury suits, uRimately resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in eventual repairs and/or replacemarvT, ofaim payouts. �� rt#et P�Y�� TOTALAIMOUNTOFTRANSACTWN$ 2Q,S�H��2H- _ _ _ COST/REVENUEBUDCETED(CIRCLEONE) YES r+o FUNDINGSWRCE 9$^}� A; f h� 9� a 6a8 pCITVRYNUMBER �98^ FINANCIAL INFORMATION: tEXPLAIN) B r •� AST = 3ZS;OOO , c; cpa 98 = 50,000 ��w...�::-.��.;�__..�_�.�.__.___�:� SUMMAI2Y OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATIONS Ward 5 Il�s� - PROJECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEVPALK N.S. W. ROSE AVE. from Farrington St. to Virguua St., W.S. FARRINGTON ST. from W. Rose Ave. to W. Maryland � �y�Z Ave. & W.S. FARRINGTdN ST. from W. Geranium Ave. to W. Rose Ave. 6WD INTTIATING ACTIOl�i: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of one {1) complaint, a petition with one (1) signer and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches and settled panels. ................................................................... PROJECT: RECO1�iSTRUCT SIDEWALK N.S. W. ROSE AVE. from Matilda St. to Albemarle St., S.S. W. I20SE AVE. from Matilda St. to Woodbridge St. & B.S. WOODBRIDGE ST, from W. Rose Ave. to W. Maryland Ave. IIVITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works ��as public necessity on the basis of two (2) complaints, a petition with one {1J signer and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, scaled, settled and cracked panels. .................................................................. • � � /� / PR03EGT• RECOPTSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. VIRGINI�1 ST. from W. Jessamine Ave. to W. Rose Ave. INITIATING ACTION: as public necessity on walk. This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works the basis of four {4} complaints and an inspection of the EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves> asphalt patches, scaled, settled and cracked panels. ................................................................... 3� CITY OF ST. PAL3I, COUN IL FILE �9� �p �((' � � Q a PRELIMINARY ORDER By File o. S9 082 thru 598084 Voti g Ward 5 In the Matter oE sidewalk zeconstruction at the £ollowing locations: 598082 - North side W Rose Ave from Farrington St to Virginia St West side Farrington St from W Rose Ave to W Maryland Ave and West side Farrington St from W Geranium Ave to W Rose Ave S98083 - North side W Rose Ave Prom Matilda St to Albemarle St South side W Rose Ave from Matilda St to Woodbridge St and West side Woodbridge St £rom W Rose Ave to W Maryland Ave 598084 - Both sides Virginia St £rom W Jessamine Ave to W Rose Ave *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three £amily structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) - 57.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and 59.18 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. Al1 other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� oP the actual cost estimated to be approximately 53.42 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet o£ new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTZ-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100°s of actual cost estimated to be approximately 54.62 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1 2 F3 That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereo£ is *SEE ASOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1998 Public Improvement Aid. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 24th dav of June. 1998 at 5:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Ha11 and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice o£ said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place o£ hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSON5 Yeas Nays � nanav ✓Blakey � strom �267eman , ��antry �'iter 2 1n Favor �J Against Adopted by Council: Date_�� `�� , Certified Passed by Council Secretary BY -� �a J� 1., _