Loading...
98-578CITY OF ST. PAUL �\,����r �� .COUNCIL FILE NO. 'S g � - 5 n. �1 FINAL ORDER � ��y 1�� By File o S9&078,598081 Voti g Ward_1&4 In the Matter of sidewalk reconstniction at the following locations: 598078 - Both sides Lafond Ave. from Kent St. to Mackubin St. 598081 - Both sides Hague Ave. from Pierce St. to N. Wheeler St *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES [ �. , l,�Q�d �vcr �-c. �'� � C:��.:N�,. V�� RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.65 per front £oot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $9.18 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. Al1 other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.42 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the £irst 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. ANLTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three Eamily structures�, NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100g of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.62 per square foot. under Preliminary order �'J -'' ��0 approved Q ��� � The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a pub ic hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all e�enses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays �B nanav— ��j5�x�,�' ✓Blakey +�ostrom ;�01 eman ; �i3`arr i s +/Lantry �iter � In Favor �Against �° 1'��Sr'Y�.� Adopted by Council: Date v-� � ���rr Certified Passed by Counci Secretary By Mayor .Public Hearing Date — June 24, 1998 RE 5-8-98 � DEPARTMENTJOFFICFJCOUNCIL o^,�,N�T��o GREEN SHEET NO. 38587 Public Works Sidewalks A'�7'9$ INITUUIDATE INRIAWATE CONTACTPERS�N&PFWNE �pEPApTMENTDIHECTOR �C CDUNCIL i LarryH.Lueth-266-6083 N ^�eE � �cmarroaNEr �cmcxEaK MUST BE ON COUNCIL AGENDA BY (DATE� 5-20-98 R�R � BUDG£T DIflEGTOA � FIN. & MGT, SERYICES DIR. For Public Hearing on 6-24-98 �MAYOfl(ORASSISTANn tQ Coundl Research TO7AL;M OF 9GNATUPE PAGES 1 _(LUP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURE) � ASSOCIA7E � A ENTAL NCCOU ANi AC710N pEaIESSED a,0 �' Reconsiruct Sidewalk in Wards 1& 4(See attached lists) RECOMMENDATiONS: Appmw (tU rn Rejaa (Po pERSONAL SERVtCE CONTRACTS ►fUST ANSWER THE FOLLON7NG QUESTIONS: PLANNING COMMISSIDN _GIVtI SERVICE CbMMISSION �- H� �� �S � NOer worked undet a contrac[ fw this departrne�t? Ci8 CoMMrREE 2. Has this persoNfirm ever been a ciry employee? — YES NO A SiAFf 3. Dces ihis person/firm possess a skill not normaity possessed by any curren[ ciry — — employee? DIS7RICiCOUNCIL YES NO SUPPORTS WNICH CAUNCILOBJECTNE4 EaP1a�� all yes a�mvers on separete sheat and attach to green sheet INITNTING PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPORTUNItt (WHO. WNAT. WHEN. WHERE, WHY�: The problem "defective sidewaik" was created because of tree roots, defeterious subgrade material, akernating freefthaw cycfes, service I'rfe limits, chemical additives, eutreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide level and must be addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left unwrrected, the sidewalk corrdition would worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusable and subjed to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possble Idigations. ADVANTAGESIFAPPPOVED; The community will benefit from this project because it will provide safe detect free sidewalks for its many citizens. The sidewalk contracts are executed by private contractors, so it fo{bws that private sector jobs are created as a resuR of this activity. DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED: Historically, ihe sidewalk reconstructions have created negative teedback in the area af construction procedure and assessment. Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it still remains comroversial. DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED: This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will� generate more personal injury_suits, uftimately resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in evenival repairs and/or replacement, as well as claim payouts. Ga�nctl Research Gentcx �,Y1�1998 TOTALAMWMOFTRANSACTION a � � COS7/BEVENUE BUOGEfED Q {CiRC1E ONE) YES NO FUNDINGSOURCE g ! '" Y ACITVITYNUMBER � -OQ��� FINpNCIAL INFORMATION: (EXPLAIN) x, — - Y, C. tta g8 = So,000 �-_.. .__�_.._...__w._ .. 1 iix�� • 5UMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATION `�g - S � 8' Ward 1 s v r� . ir � pRp,JECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. LAFOND AVE. from Kent St. to Mackubin St. I1�iITIATIPIG ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIOl�i5: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, scaled and settled panels. ................................................................... � SLJIYIMARY OF ENCINEERING RECOMMENDATION �$ S �� Ward 4 PROJECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. HAGUE AVE. from Pierce St, to N. Wheeler St. I1�IITIATING AGTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of four (4) complaints, a petition with one (1} �� ! signer and an inspection of the walk. E%ISTTNG CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, disintegrated, scaled, settled and cracked panels. .................................................................. CITY OF ST. PAIIL COUNCIL FILE N0. �o - y.3S PRELIMINARY ORDBR By Fi1 598078,598081 Voting Ward 1&4 In the Matter of sidawalk reconstructioa at the followiag locations: 598078 - Both sides Lafond Ave. from Kent St. to Mackubin St. 598081 - Both sides Hague Ave. from Pierce St. to N. Wheeler St. *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstructioa (replacement of old sidewalk} -$7.65 per £ront foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $9.18 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths wi11 be prorated accordingly. Naw construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.42 per square foot_ 3.3 �� S'!� All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstrucCed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100g of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.62 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1 � 3 That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1998 Public Improvement Aid. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 24th dav of Sune, 1498 at 5:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature o£ the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas / Nays �� Benanav ✓Blakey ✓B� strom ✓Coleman ✓xarri s � try eiter �In Favor � Against Adopted by Council: Date � � `\Y � Certified Passed by Council Secretary By� �, a . �. �,-.�_ _ ._ C � Mayor CITY OF ST. PAUL �\,����r �� .COUNCIL FILE NO. 'S g � - 5 n. �1 FINAL ORDER � ��y 1�� By File o S9&078,598081 Voti g Ward_1&4 In the Matter of sidewalk reconstniction at the following locations: 598078 - Both sides Lafond Ave. from Kent St. to Mackubin St. 598081 - Both sides Hague Ave. from Pierce St. to N. Wheeler St *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES [ �. , l,�Q�d �vcr �-c. �'� � C:��.:N�,. V�� RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.65 per front £oot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $9.18 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. Al1 other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.42 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the £irst 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. ANLTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three Eamily structures�, NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100g of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.62 per square foot. under Preliminary order �'J -'' ��0 approved Q ��� � The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a pub ic hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all e�enses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays �B nanav— ��j5�x�,�' ✓Blakey +�ostrom ;�01 eman ; �i3`arr i s +/Lantry �iter � In Favor �Against �° 1'��Sr'Y�.� Adopted by Council: Date v-� � ���rr Certified Passed by Counci Secretary By Mayor .Public Hearing Date — June 24, 1998 RE 5-8-98 � DEPARTMENTJOFFICFJCOUNCIL o^,�,N�T��o GREEN SHEET NO. 38587 Public Works Sidewalks A'�7'9$ INITUUIDATE INRIAWATE CONTACTPERS�N&PFWNE �pEPApTMENTDIHECTOR �C CDUNCIL i LarryH.Lueth-266-6083 N ^�eE � �cmarroaNEr �cmcxEaK MUST BE ON COUNCIL AGENDA BY (DATE� 5-20-98 R�R � BUDG£T DIflEGTOA � FIN. & MGT, SERYICES DIR. For Public Hearing on 6-24-98 �MAYOfl(ORASSISTANn tQ Coundl Research TO7AL;M OF 9GNATUPE PAGES 1 _(LUP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURE) � ASSOCIA7E � A ENTAL NCCOU ANi AC710N pEaIESSED a,0 �' Reconsiruct Sidewalk in Wards 1& 4(See attached lists) RECOMMENDATiONS: Appmw (tU rn Rejaa (Po pERSONAL SERVtCE CONTRACTS ►fUST ANSWER THE FOLLON7NG QUESTIONS: PLANNING COMMISSIDN _GIVtI SERVICE CbMMISSION �- H� �� �S � NOer worked undet a contrac[ fw this departrne�t? Ci8 CoMMrREE 2. Has this persoNfirm ever been a ciry employee? — YES NO A SiAFf 3. Dces ihis person/firm possess a skill not normaity possessed by any curren[ ciry — — employee? DIS7RICiCOUNCIL YES NO SUPPORTS WNICH CAUNCILOBJECTNE4 EaP1a�� all yes a�mvers on separete sheat and attach to green sheet INITNTING PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPORTUNItt (WHO. WNAT. WHEN. WHERE, WHY�: The problem "defective sidewaik" was created because of tree roots, defeterious subgrade material, akernating freefthaw cycfes, service I'rfe limits, chemical additives, eutreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide level and must be addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left unwrrected, the sidewalk corrdition would worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusable and subjed to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possble Idigations. ADVANTAGESIFAPPPOVED; The community will benefit from this project because it will provide safe detect free sidewalks for its many citizens. The sidewalk contracts are executed by private contractors, so it fo{bws that private sector jobs are created as a resuR of this activity. DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED: Historically, ihe sidewalk reconstructions have created negative teedback in the area af construction procedure and assessment. Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it still remains comroversial. DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED: This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will� generate more personal injury_suits, uftimately resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in evenival repairs and/or replacement, as well as claim payouts. Ga�nctl Research Gentcx �,Y1�1998 TOTALAMWMOFTRANSACTION a � � COS7/BEVENUE BUOGEfED Q {CiRC1E ONE) YES NO FUNDINGSOURCE g ! '" Y ACITVITYNUMBER � -OQ��� FINpNCIAL INFORMATION: (EXPLAIN) x, — - Y, C. tta g8 = So,000 �-_.. .__�_.._...__w._ .. 1 iix�� • 5UMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATION `�g - S � 8' Ward 1 s v r� . ir � pRp,JECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. LAFOND AVE. from Kent St. to Mackubin St. I1�iITIATIPIG ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIOl�i5: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, scaled and settled panels. ................................................................... � SLJIYIMARY OF ENCINEERING RECOMMENDATION �$ S �� Ward 4 PROJECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. HAGUE AVE. from Pierce St, to N. Wheeler St. I1�IITIATING AGTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of four (4) complaints, a petition with one (1} �� ! signer and an inspection of the walk. E%ISTTNG CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, disintegrated, scaled, settled and cracked panels. .................................................................. CITY OF ST. PAIIL COUNCIL FILE N0. �o - y.3S PRELIMINARY ORDBR By Fi1 598078,598081 Voting Ward 1&4 In the Matter of sidawalk reconstructioa at the followiag locations: 598078 - Both sides Lafond Ave. from Kent St. to Mackubin St. 598081 - Both sides Hague Ave. from Pierce St. to N. Wheeler St. *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstructioa (replacement of old sidewalk} -$7.65 per £ront foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $9.18 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths wi11 be prorated accordingly. Naw construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.42 per square foot_ 3.3 �� S'!� All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstrucCed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100g of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.62 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1 � 3 That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1998 Public Improvement Aid. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 24th dav of Sune, 1498 at 5:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature o£ the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas / Nays �� Benanav ✓Blakey ✓B� strom ✓Coleman ✓xarri s � try eiter �In Favor � Against Adopted by Council: Date � � `\Y � Certified Passed by Council Secretary By� �, a . �. �,-.�_ _ ._ C � Mayor CITY OF ST. PAUL �\,����r �� .COUNCIL FILE NO. 'S g � - 5 n. �1 FINAL ORDER � ��y 1�� By File o S9&078,598081 Voti g Ward_1&4 In the Matter of sidewalk reconstniction at the following locations: 598078 - Both sides Lafond Ave. from Kent St. to Mackubin St. 598081 - Both sides Hague Ave. from Pierce St. to N. Wheeler St *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES [ �. , l,�Q�d �vcr �-c. �'� � C:��.:N�,. V�� RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.65 per front £oot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $9.18 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. Al1 other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.42 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the £irst 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. ANLTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three Eamily structures�, NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100g of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.62 per square foot. under Preliminary order �'J -'' ��0 approved Q ��� � The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a pub ic hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all e�enses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays �B nanav— ��j5�x�,�' ✓Blakey +�ostrom ;�01 eman ; �i3`arr i s +/Lantry �iter � In Favor �Against �° 1'��Sr'Y�.� Adopted by Council: Date v-� � ���rr Certified Passed by Counci Secretary By Mayor .Public Hearing Date — June 24, 1998 RE 5-8-98 � DEPARTMENTJOFFICFJCOUNCIL o^,�,N�T��o GREEN SHEET NO. 38587 Public Works Sidewalks A'�7'9$ INITUUIDATE INRIAWATE CONTACTPERS�N&PFWNE �pEPApTMENTDIHECTOR �C CDUNCIL i LarryH.Lueth-266-6083 N ^�eE � �cmarroaNEr �cmcxEaK MUST BE ON COUNCIL AGENDA BY (DATE� 5-20-98 R�R � BUDG£T DIflEGTOA � FIN. & MGT, SERYICES DIR. For Public Hearing on 6-24-98 �MAYOfl(ORASSISTANn tQ Coundl Research TO7AL;M OF 9GNATUPE PAGES 1 _(LUP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURE) � ASSOCIA7E � A ENTAL NCCOU ANi AC710N pEaIESSED a,0 �' Reconsiruct Sidewalk in Wards 1& 4(See attached lists) RECOMMENDATiONS: Appmw (tU rn Rejaa (Po pERSONAL SERVtCE CONTRACTS ►fUST ANSWER THE FOLLON7NG QUESTIONS: PLANNING COMMISSIDN _GIVtI SERVICE CbMMISSION �- H� �� �S � NOer worked undet a contrac[ fw this departrne�t? Ci8 CoMMrREE 2. Has this persoNfirm ever been a ciry employee? — YES NO A SiAFf 3. Dces ihis person/firm possess a skill not normaity possessed by any curren[ ciry — — employee? DIS7RICiCOUNCIL YES NO SUPPORTS WNICH CAUNCILOBJECTNE4 EaP1a�� all yes a�mvers on separete sheat and attach to green sheet INITNTING PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPORTUNItt (WHO. WNAT. WHEN. WHERE, WHY�: The problem "defective sidewaik" was created because of tree roots, defeterious subgrade material, akernating freefthaw cycfes, service I'rfe limits, chemical additives, eutreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide level and must be addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left unwrrected, the sidewalk corrdition would worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusable and subjed to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possble Idigations. ADVANTAGESIFAPPPOVED; The community will benefit from this project because it will provide safe detect free sidewalks for its many citizens. The sidewalk contracts are executed by private contractors, so it fo{bws that private sector jobs are created as a resuR of this activity. DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED: Historically, ihe sidewalk reconstructions have created negative teedback in the area af construction procedure and assessment. Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it still remains comroversial. DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED: This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will� generate more personal injury_suits, uftimately resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in evenival repairs and/or replacement, as well as claim payouts. Ga�nctl Research Gentcx �,Y1�1998 TOTALAMWMOFTRANSACTION a � � COS7/BEVENUE BUOGEfED Q {CiRC1E ONE) YES NO FUNDINGSOURCE g ! '" Y ACITVITYNUMBER � -OQ��� FINpNCIAL INFORMATION: (EXPLAIN) x, — - Y, C. tta g8 = So,000 �-_.. .__�_.._...__w._ .. 1 iix�� • 5UMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATION `�g - S � 8' Ward 1 s v r� . ir � pRp,JECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. LAFOND AVE. from Kent St. to Mackubin St. I1�iITIATIPIG ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIOl�i5: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, scaled and settled panels. ................................................................... � SLJIYIMARY OF ENCINEERING RECOMMENDATION �$ S �� Ward 4 PROJECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. HAGUE AVE. from Pierce St, to N. Wheeler St. I1�IITIATING AGTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of four (4) complaints, a petition with one (1} �� ! signer and an inspection of the walk. E%ISTTNG CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, disintegrated, scaled, settled and cracked panels. .................................................................. CITY OF ST. PAIIL COUNCIL FILE N0. �o - y.3S PRELIMINARY ORDBR By Fi1 598078,598081 Voting Ward 1&4 In the Matter of sidawalk reconstructioa at the followiag locations: 598078 - Both sides Lafond Ave. from Kent St. to Mackubin St. 598081 - Both sides Hague Ave. from Pierce St. to N. Wheeler St. *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstructioa (replacement of old sidewalk} -$7.65 per £ront foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $9.18 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths wi11 be prorated accordingly. Naw construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.42 per square foot_ 3.3 �� S'!� All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstrucCed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100g of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.62 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1 � 3 That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1998 Public Improvement Aid. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 24th dav of Sune, 1498 at 5:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature o£ the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas / Nays �� Benanav ✓Blakey ✓B� strom ✓Coleman ✓xarri s � try eiter �In Favor � Against Adopted by Council: Date � � `\Y � Certified Passed by Council Secretary By� �, a . �. �,-.�_ _ ._ C � Mayor