The URL can be used to link to this page

98-577CITY OF ST. PAUL FINAL ORDER Y -��6`nev��.�. � � ay `qS' �OU IL ILE \p �5�� BY Fil o. S 7 thru 598080 Voting Ward 3 �� In the Matter o£ sidewalk reconstruction at the £ollowing locations: L over � S98079 - Both sides Jef£erson Ave from S Fairview Ave to S Prior Ave� e:4 ��^^'<"-" S98080 - Both sides Jefferson Ave £rom S Finn St to S Cretin Ave �,,,\��,�`�`�� *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three £amily structures) Reconstruction (reglacement of old sidewalk) -$7.65 per front foot for a£ive (5) foot wide walk and $9.18 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 1000 of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.42 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (MOre than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.62 per square foot. under Preliminary order � � — �'.J� approved �� \��,� —_�` The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a pub 'c hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays Benanav� Absc�n� �akey +�ostrom :�oleman �farris ✓Lantry �iter Adopted by Council: Date a.y l Certified Passed by Counci Secretary b In Favor By O Against ' �\ 5 ��1 Mayor ` D 1 Public Hearing Date — June 24, 1998 RE 5-8-98 e � p pp DEPAPTMENT/OFFICHCOUNCiI DA7EINITIA7ED GREEN SHEET NO. `�O� Public Works Sidewaiks 4-17-98 x�iTiawA� NITIAUDATE CONTACi PEflSON 8 PHONE DEPAHTMEM DIRECTOfl CITY COUNCIL � Larry H. Lueth - 266-6083 ��N � cm nrroauEV cm a Eax NUYBER PoR MUSTBEONCOUNCILAGENDABYiDATE) 5 R � �g�p�E7DIREC70fl �FIN.&MGT.SEflVICESDIR For Public Hearing on 6-24-9$ �MAVOp(ORASSISTAN7) 7�Council Research TOTAL N OF SIGNqTI/RE PAGES 1 _(CL1P ALL LOCATIONS FOR 9GNATURt7 � ASSOCIATE P ENT AFiT AC71ON qEWE57ED Reconstruct Sidewalk in Ward 3(See attached list) REWMMENDATiONS: aaqme (A) a Reja�s (a� pER50NAL SERVICE CONiRACTS MUST ANSWER THE WLLOWING QUESTIONS: pLANNING COMMIS..r�p�y _CNIL SERVK� COMIMISSlON �� m�s �ES� NO� ��d undM a conVac[ fof ihis depa/tment? GI8 COMMITfEE 2. Has rtiis person/firm ever been a cfty amployee? — YES NO A sTAFF 3. Does this person/firm possess a skill not normalty possessed by any curcent ciry — — employee? OISTpICTGOUNCIL YES NO sUaPOH7S WHICH cOUNCIL O&lECiNE? ExP�aln all yes answervs on separate shaet arnl atWCh to graen sheet INYf1ATING PROBLEM, 155UE, OPPORNNI7Y (WHD, WHAT, WHEN, WH£RE, WHJ): The problem "defiective sidewalk" was created because ofi tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, atternating treeRhaw cycles, service Irfe {imits, chemical additives, eMreme temperaiure variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide Ievei and must be addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition wouid worsen to a state where ii would be rendered unusable and subjed to increased pedastrian in}uries Trom falls and possible litigations. ADVANTAGESIFAPPROVEO: Tha communfty wi{I benefit from this project because It wil! provide safe detect free sidewalks for its many citizens. The sidewalk contracts are executed by private contractors, so it follows that private sector jobs are crested as a resuit of this activity. OISADVANTAGES IF APPftOVFA: Hisiorically, tMe sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment. Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despBe ihe fact up to one-half ihe assessment is City subsidized, it still remains controversial. DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVEO: This option would allow the inftastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, wil4-generatz more personal injury-suits,-- uRimately resufting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in eventuat repairs andlor repiacement, as weil as claim payouts. �otmcfl Rsse��ch Cer�� MAY 11 i99� TOTALAMWMOFTflANSACT10N5 21��g t 2 COST/REVENUEBUDGETED(CIRCLEONE) YES NO FUNDMGSOURCE 9 {1 P A 9 - 7�.00� ACRVfTYNUMBEH C9$ �2T75;-o784-0000a FINANCIAL INFORMATIDN: (EXPIAINl 1 � T "—_-----=-----�---.--.__,,,._._., �_ ri� C�'Q �$ = J�0#D�d _'_"'._'_" SUMMARY OF E1�3GINEERING RECOMMENDATIONS Ward 3 .��, PR0�3ECT' RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. JEFFERSON AVE. from S. Fairview Ave. to S. Prior Ave. � ��.-�- , INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Fublic Works as public necessity on the basis of four (4� complaints, a peUton with one (1) signer and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is old tile and poured concrete with tree heaves, broken tile, holes in tile, asphalt patches, scaled, settled and cracked panels. ................................................................... PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. JEFFERSON AVE. from S. � Finn St. to S. Cretin Ave. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works S �J,b$� as public necessity on the basis of two (2) complaints, a petition with one (1) � � signer and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with heaves, scaled, settled and cracked panels. ................................................................... qd�- S�� CZTY OF ST. PAUI. C B L IL N. 9fl y37 �� , �, PRELZMINARY ORDER By Fi e No. S 8 79 thru 598080 Voting Ward 3 In the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction at the £ollowing locations: 598079 - Both sides Jefferson Ave from S Fairview Ave to S Prior Ave S980$0 - Both sides Jefferson Ave from S Finn St to S Cretin Ave *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three £amily structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7_65 per front £oot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $9.18 per Pront foot Por a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 1000 of the actual cost estimated to be approximately 53.42 per square foot. All corner residential properties wi11 receive a credit up to the first 15� feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the praperty. MtLI,TI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three £amily structures}, NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.62 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1 2. 3. That the said seport and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE £or estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1998 Public Improvement Aid. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 24th day o �n . 199R at 5:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Buildinq in the City of Saint Pau1. That notice of said public hearinq be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas / Nays �Benanav �lakey �ostrom ,/Eoleman :�iarris ✓�antry ✓�eiter � In Favor �Against Adopted by Council: Date�`�`t� ( � Certi£ied Passed by Council Se retary BY_TT_ a ��v-„ � �� Mayor CITY OF ST. PAUL FINAL ORDER Y -��6`nev��.�. � � ay `qS' �OU IL ILE \p �5�� BY Fil o. S 7 thru 598080 Voting Ward 3 �� In the Matter o£ sidewalk reconstruction at the £ollowing locations: L over � S98079 - Both sides Jef£erson Ave from S Fairview Ave to S Prior Ave� e:4 ��^^'<"-" S98080 - Both sides Jefferson Ave £rom S Finn St to S Cretin Ave �,,,\��,�`�`�� *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three £amily structures) Reconstruction (reglacement of old sidewalk) -$7.65 per front foot for a£ive (5) foot wide walk and $9.18 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 1000 of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.42 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (MOre than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.62 per square foot. under Preliminary order � � — �'.J� approved �� \��,� —_�` The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a pub 'c hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays Benanav� Absc�n� �akey +�ostrom :�oleman �farris ✓Lantry �iter Adopted by Council: Date a.y l Certified Passed by Counci Secretary b In Favor By O Against ' �\ 5 ��1 Mayor ` D 1 Public Hearing Date — June 24, 1998 RE 5-8-98 e � p pp DEPAPTMENT/OFFICHCOUNCiI DA7EINITIA7ED GREEN SHEET NO. `�O� Public Works Sidewaiks 4-17-98 x�iTiawA� NITIAUDATE CONTACi PEflSON 8 PHONE DEPAHTMEM DIRECTOfl CITY COUNCIL � Larry H. Lueth - 266-6083 ��N � cm nrroauEV cm a Eax NUYBER PoR MUSTBEONCOUNCILAGENDABYiDATE) 5 R � �g�p�E7DIREC70fl �FIN.&MGT.SEflVICESDIR For Public Hearing on 6-24-9$ �MAVOp(ORASSISTAN7) 7�Council Research TOTAL N OF SIGNqTI/RE PAGES 1 _(CL1P ALL LOCATIONS FOR 9GNATURt7 � ASSOCIATE P ENT AFiT AC71ON qEWE57ED Reconstruct Sidewalk in Ward 3(See attached list) REWMMENDATiONS: aaqme (A) a Reja�s (a� pER50NAL SERVICE CONiRACTS MUST ANSWER THE WLLOWING QUESTIONS: pLANNING COMMIS..r�p�y _CNIL SERVK� COMIMISSlON �� m�s �ES� NO� ��d undM a conVac[ fof ihis depa/tment? GI8 COMMITfEE 2. Has rtiis person/firm ever been a cfty amployee? — YES NO A sTAFF 3. Does this person/firm possess a skill not normalty possessed by any curcent ciry — — employee? OISTpICTGOUNCIL YES NO sUaPOH7S WHICH cOUNCIL O&lECiNE? ExP�aln all yes answervs on separate shaet arnl atWCh to graen sheet INYf1ATING PROBLEM, 155UE, OPPORNNI7Y (WHD, WHAT, WHEN, WH£RE, WHJ): The problem "defiective sidewalk" was created because ofi tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, atternating treeRhaw cycles, service Irfe {imits, chemical additives, eMreme temperaiure variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide Ievei and must be addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition wouid worsen to a state where ii would be rendered unusable and subjed to increased pedastrian in}uries Trom falls and possible litigations. ADVANTAGESIFAPPROVEO: Tha communfty wi{I benefit from this project because It wil! provide safe detect free sidewalks for its many citizens. The sidewalk contracts are executed by private contractors, so it follows that private sector jobs are crested as a resuit of this activity. OISADVANTAGES IF APPftOVFA: Hisiorically, tMe sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment. Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despBe ihe fact up to one-half ihe assessment is City subsidized, it still remains controversial. DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVEO: This option would allow the inftastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, wil4-generatz more personal injury-suits,-- uRimately resufting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in eventuat repairs andlor repiacement, as weil as claim payouts. �otmcfl Rsse��ch Cer�� MAY 11 i99� TOTALAMWMOFTflANSACT10N5 21��g t 2 COST/REVENUEBUDGETED(CIRCLEONE) YES NO FUNDMGSOURCE 9 {1 P A 9 - 7�.00� ACRVfTYNUMBEH C9$ �2T75;-o784-0000a FINANCIAL INFORMATIDN: (EXPIAINl 1 � T "—_-----=-----�---.--.__,,,._._., �_ ri� C�'Q �$ = J�0#D�d _'_"'._'_" SUMMARY OF E1�3GINEERING RECOMMENDATIONS Ward 3 .��, PR0�3ECT' RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. JEFFERSON AVE. from S. Fairview Ave. to S. Prior Ave. � ��.-�- , INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Fublic Works as public necessity on the basis of four (4� complaints, a peUton with one (1) signer and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is old tile and poured concrete with tree heaves, broken tile, holes in tile, asphalt patches, scaled, settled and cracked panels. ................................................................... PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. JEFFERSON AVE. from S. � Finn St. to S. Cretin Ave. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works S �J,b$� as public necessity on the basis of two (2) complaints, a petition with one (1) � � signer and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with heaves, scaled, settled and cracked panels. ................................................................... qd�- S�� CZTY OF ST. PAUI. C B L IL N. 9fl y37 �� , �, PRELZMINARY ORDER By Fi e No. S 8 79 thru 598080 Voting Ward 3 In the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction at the £ollowing locations: 598079 - Both sides Jefferson Ave from S Fairview Ave to S Prior Ave S980$0 - Both sides Jefferson Ave from S Finn St to S Cretin Ave *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three £amily structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7_65 per front £oot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $9.18 per Pront foot Por a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 1000 of the actual cost estimated to be approximately 53.42 per square foot. All corner residential properties wi11 receive a credit up to the first 15� feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the praperty. MtLI,TI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three £amily structures}, NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.62 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1 2. 3. That the said seport and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE £or estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1998 Public Improvement Aid. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 24th day o �n . 199R at 5:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Buildinq in the City of Saint Pau1. That notice of said public hearinq be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas / Nays �Benanav �lakey �ostrom ,/Eoleman :�iarris ✓�antry ✓�eiter � In Favor �Against Adopted by Council: Date�`�`t� ( � Certi£ied Passed by Council Se retary BY_TT_ a ��v-„ � �� Mayor CITY OF ST. PAUL FINAL ORDER Y -��6`nev��.�. � � ay `qS' �OU IL ILE \p �5�� BY Fil o. S 7 thru 598080 Voting Ward 3 �� In the Matter o£ sidewalk reconstruction at the £ollowing locations: L over � S98079 - Both sides Jef£erson Ave from S Fairview Ave to S Prior Ave� e:4 ��^^'<"-" S98080 - Both sides Jefferson Ave £rom S Finn St to S Cretin Ave �,,,\��,�`�`�� *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three £amily structures) Reconstruction (reglacement of old sidewalk) -$7.65 per front foot for a£ive (5) foot wide walk and $9.18 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 1000 of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.42 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (MOre than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.62 per square foot. under Preliminary order � � — �'.J� approved �� \��,� —_�` The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a pub 'c hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays Benanav� Absc�n� �akey +�ostrom :�oleman �farris ✓Lantry �iter Adopted by Council: Date a.y l Certified Passed by Counci Secretary b In Favor By O Against ' �\ 5 ��1 Mayor ` D 1 Public Hearing Date — June 24, 1998 RE 5-8-98 e � p pp DEPAPTMENT/OFFICHCOUNCiI DA7EINITIA7ED GREEN SHEET NO. `�O� Public Works Sidewaiks 4-17-98 x�iTiawA� NITIAUDATE CONTACi PEflSON 8 PHONE DEPAHTMEM DIRECTOfl CITY COUNCIL � Larry H. Lueth - 266-6083 ��N � cm nrroauEV cm a Eax NUYBER PoR MUSTBEONCOUNCILAGENDABYiDATE) 5 R � �g�p�E7DIREC70fl �FIN.&MGT.SEflVICESDIR For Public Hearing on 6-24-9$ �MAVOp(ORASSISTAN7) 7�Council Research TOTAL N OF SIGNqTI/RE PAGES 1 _(CL1P ALL LOCATIONS FOR 9GNATURt7 � ASSOCIATE P ENT AFiT AC71ON qEWE57ED Reconstruct Sidewalk in Ward 3(See attached list) REWMMENDATiONS: aaqme (A) a Reja�s (a� pER50NAL SERVICE CONiRACTS MUST ANSWER THE WLLOWING QUESTIONS: pLANNING COMMIS..r�p�y _CNIL SERVK� COMIMISSlON �� m�s �ES� NO� ��d undM a conVac[ fof ihis depa/tment? GI8 COMMITfEE 2. Has rtiis person/firm ever been a cfty amployee? — YES NO A sTAFF 3. Does this person/firm possess a skill not normalty possessed by any curcent ciry — — employee? OISTpICTGOUNCIL YES NO sUaPOH7S WHICH cOUNCIL O&lECiNE? ExP�aln all yes answervs on separate shaet arnl atWCh to graen sheet INYf1ATING PROBLEM, 155UE, OPPORNNI7Y (WHD, WHAT, WHEN, WH£RE, WHJ): The problem "defiective sidewalk" was created because ofi tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, atternating treeRhaw cycles, service Irfe {imits, chemical additives, eMreme temperaiure variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide Ievei and must be addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition wouid worsen to a state where ii would be rendered unusable and subjed to increased pedastrian in}uries Trom falls and possible litigations. ADVANTAGESIFAPPROVEO: Tha communfty wi{I benefit from this project because It wil! provide safe detect free sidewalks for its many citizens. The sidewalk contracts are executed by private contractors, so it follows that private sector jobs are crested as a resuit of this activity. OISADVANTAGES IF APPftOVFA: Hisiorically, tMe sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment. Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despBe ihe fact up to one-half ihe assessment is City subsidized, it still remains controversial. DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVEO: This option would allow the inftastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, wil4-generatz more personal injury-suits,-- uRimately resufting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in eventuat repairs andlor repiacement, as weil as claim payouts. �otmcfl Rsse��ch Cer�� MAY 11 i99� TOTALAMWMOFTflANSACT10N5 21��g t 2 COST/REVENUEBUDGETED(CIRCLEONE) YES NO FUNDMGSOURCE 9 {1 P A 9 - 7�.00� ACRVfTYNUMBEH C9$ �2T75;-o784-0000a FINANCIAL INFORMATIDN: (EXPIAINl 1 � T "—_-----=-----�---.--.__,,,._._., �_ ri� C�'Q �$ = J�0#D�d _'_"'._'_" SUMMARY OF E1�3GINEERING RECOMMENDATIONS Ward 3 .��, PR0�3ECT' RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. JEFFERSON AVE. from S. Fairview Ave. to S. Prior Ave. � ��.-�- , INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Fublic Works as public necessity on the basis of four (4� complaints, a peUton with one (1) signer and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is old tile and poured concrete with tree heaves, broken tile, holes in tile, asphalt patches, scaled, settled and cracked panels. ................................................................... PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. JEFFERSON AVE. from S. � Finn St. to S. Cretin Ave. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works S �J,b$� as public necessity on the basis of two (2) complaints, a petition with one (1) � � signer and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with heaves, scaled, settled and cracked panels. ................................................................... qd�- S�� CZTY OF ST. PAUI. C B L IL N. 9fl y37 �� , �, PRELZMINARY ORDER By Fi e No. S 8 79 thru 598080 Voting Ward 3 In the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction at the £ollowing locations: 598079 - Both sides Jefferson Ave from S Fairview Ave to S Prior Ave S980$0 - Both sides Jefferson Ave from S Finn St to S Cretin Ave *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three £amily structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7_65 per front £oot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $9.18 per Pront foot Por a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 1000 of the actual cost estimated to be approximately 53.42 per square foot. All corner residential properties wi11 receive a credit up to the first 15� feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the praperty. MtLI,TI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three £amily structures}, NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.62 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1 2. 3. That the said seport and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE £or estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1998 Public Improvement Aid. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 24th day o �n . 199R at 5:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Buildinq in the City of Saint Pau1. That notice of said public hearinq be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas / Nays �Benanav �lakey �ostrom ,/Eoleman :�iarris ✓�antry ✓�eiter � In Favor �Against Adopted by Council: Date�`�`t� ( � Certi£ied Passed by Council Se retary BY_TT_ a ��v-„ � �� Mayor