98-574CITY OF ST. PAUL COUNCIL FILE N0. � S R ! O
FINAL ORDER By �
Fi1e 598069 t ru 598070
Vot' g ard 4
In the Matter o£ sidewalk reconstruction at the following locations:
598069 - Both sides Fry St from Englewood Ave to Hubbard Ave
S98070 - Both sides Marshall Ave from N Howell St to N Prior Ave
598071 - Both sides N Prior Ave from Dayton Ave to Marshall Ave
*ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES
RF�SIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures)
Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.65 per front foot for a five (5)
foot wide walk and $9.18 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide
walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction
(where no walk existed) - 1000 of the actual cost estimated to be
approximately 53.42 per square foot.
Al1 corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150
feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "lonq side" of
the property.
MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (MOre than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES
For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100% of actual cost estimated to be
approximately $4.62 per square foot.
under Preliminary order 1� —�� y approved �`t`t�
The Council of the City o£ Saint Paul has conducted a pub ic hearing upon the
above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City
Charter; and
WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations
pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now,
therefore, be it
RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Pau1 does hereby order that the
above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed
and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it
FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City
officers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to
the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter.
COUNCILPERSONS
Yeas Nays
Benanav /�h�y�}
✓3�lakey
�s trom
+�"01 eman
vKarris
� nt ry
�iter
6 1n F
(� Aqai
l �
Adopted by Council
Certified Passed by
Date a l°l��'
Counci Secretary
or
P�blic Hearing Date — June 24, 1998 RE 5-8-98 e � p
OEPARTMENT/OFFICFJCOUNCIL DAiEINITIA7ED GREEN SHEET NO. `���
Pubtic Works Sidewalks 410.98 iNmnwn� MRIAIJDATE
CONTACT PEPSON 8 PHONE DEPARTMENT DIflECTOR � CITV COUNCIL �
LarryH.Lueth-266-6083 � gcmnnoaNEr �cmci.eaK
MUSTBEONCOUNCILAGENDABY(DAi� S-ZO-JH � ���ETOIpECTOR �FW.&6lGT.SERVICESOIii.
For Public Hearing on 6-24-98 �MAYOP(ORASSISTANT) � Cou�il Research
TOiAL! OF SIGlUNftE PAGES 1 _(CLIP ALL LOCAlIONS FOR SIGNANR� � ASSOCIATE DEP EMAL ACCOUNTANT
ACTION flEWE57ED -Jt7
Reconstruct Sidewalk in Ward 4(See attached list)
REGOMMENDATIONS: Approva (A} w Rejeet (R) pERSONAL SERNCE COMRACTS MUST ANSWEfi THE FOLLOWING Ql7ESS10NS:
PLANNING COMMISSION _�iL SEFVICE COMMISSION 1. H2s ihis E PMSONFI N0 0f Wo(ked ufWO� a CoRtraCt fOf th15 dEparOnent?
Y S
_GIB CAMMITTEE _ 2. H � m � yES � NO er been a ciry emploYee?
A S7AFF 3. tbes ihis person/firm possess a skill not rrormaly possessed by any curcent dty
— employee?
DISTRICTCOUNCIL YES NO
SUPPOq'TS WH7CH CWNCIL OBJECTNE? �P�ain all yes answers on separate sheot and attaeh to green s�eet
INRIATING PFOeLEM, ISSUE, OPPORlUN11Y (WriO, WFiAT, WHEN, WHERE, WFI`n:
The probfem "defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious su6grade material, alternating freefthaw cycles,
service I'rfa limits, chemical add'Aives, e�ctreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a cftywide level and must be
addressed and corrected on an annuai basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condftion would worsen to a state where it would be
rendered unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations.
ADVANTAGESIFAPPROVE�:
The communRy will benefit from this project because it will provide safe detect free sidewalks for its many citizens. The sidewalk
contracts are executed by private contractors, so it foilows ihat private sector jobs are created as a resuft of this activity.
DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED:
Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment.
Simply stated, proQerty owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it still
remains controversiai.
DISADVANTAGES W NOT APPROVED:
This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal injury suits,
uRimately resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in eventual repairs ant'f�/oi repTace'ment, es well as olaim payouts.
� R�sea�ch Center
S�Y 1 � i�98
TOTAL AMOUM OFTflANSACTIONS 1 Z��B ]6 COST/qEVENUE BUDGETED (CIRCLE ONE) YES No
FUNDINGSWHCE gH--M-U6F.lS A PI'A �$, s? �]H (J(}Q ACINfTYNUMBEFi C$-.
FINANCIAL MFORMATION: (EXPLAIN) $. �S'�' � 3'L7 �OOO ^
r� '�,.._ _.-..-._._._._.-...-.� _._.. _" ' _' _ _ '
ex CFB 98 = So,oOo
SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDAT'IONS
Ward 4
/
if�-��_
PROJECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALS B.S. FRY ST. from Englewood Ave.
to Hubbard Ave.
��j��� INITIATING ACTION:
as public necessity on
walk.
This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works
the basis of one {1) complaint and an inspection of the
EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves,
asphalt patches and scaled panels.
...................................................................
PROJECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALH B.S. MARSHALL AVE. from 1�3.
Howell St. to N. Prior Ave.
���IO IDTITIATING ACTION:
as public necessity on
walk.
This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works
the basis of four {4) complaints and an inspection of the
EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves,
asphalt patches, settled and cracked panels.
....................................................... . ..........
PRO.T�CT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALH B.S. N. PRIOR AVE. from Dayton
Ave. to Marshall Ave.
y� C/�' INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of 1'ublic Works
� as public necessity on the basis of one {1) complaint and an inspection of the
walk.
EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves,
asphalt patches and settled panels.
...................................................................
°�� -s y
CITY OF ST. PAUI. COUNCIL FILE NO. �O -Z I� `�
PRELIMINARY ORDER By
File o S9 069 t ru 59807�
Voti g ard 4 �
In the Matter o£ sidewalk reconstruction at the following locations:
598069 - Both sides Fry St from Englewood Ave to Hubbard Ave
S98070 - Both sides Marshall Ave from N Howell St to N Prior Ave
598071 - Both sides N P=ior Ave from Dayton Ave to Marshall Ave
*ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES
RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures)
Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.65 per front foot for a
five (5) foot wide walk and $9.18 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide
walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction
(where no walk existed) - 100°s of the actual cost estimated to be
approximately $3.42 per squara foot.
All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150
feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of
the property.
MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three Pamily structures), NON-RESIDENTrAL RATES
For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100s oP actual cost estimated to be
approximately $4.62 per square foot.
The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon
the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves:
1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives,
and that the estimated cost thereo£ is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction
rates, financed by assessments and 1998 Public Improvement Aid.
2.
3.
That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 24th dav of June, 1998
at 5:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House
Building in the City of Saint Paul.
That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner
provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of
the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated.
COBNCILPERSONS
Yeas Nays
�enanav
t/8lakey
•�os t rom
�oleman
vHarris
vLantry
�iter
� In Favor
�Against
Adopted by Council: Date � ��
Certi£ied Passed by Council Secretary
BY�� 3 ��
\
Mayor
CITY OF ST. PAUL COUNCIL FILE N0. � S R ! O
FINAL ORDER By �
Fi1e 598069 t ru 598070
Vot' g ard 4
In the Matter o£ sidewalk reconstruction at the following locations:
598069 - Both sides Fry St from Englewood Ave to Hubbard Ave
S98070 - Both sides Marshall Ave from N Howell St to N Prior Ave
598071 - Both sides N Prior Ave from Dayton Ave to Marshall Ave
*ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES
RF�SIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures)
Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.65 per front foot for a five (5)
foot wide walk and $9.18 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide
walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction
(where no walk existed) - 1000 of the actual cost estimated to be
approximately 53.42 per square foot.
Al1 corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150
feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "lonq side" of
the property.
MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (MOre than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES
For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100% of actual cost estimated to be
approximately $4.62 per square foot.
under Preliminary order 1� —�� y approved �`t`t�
The Council of the City o£ Saint Paul has conducted a pub ic hearing upon the
above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City
Charter; and
WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations
pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now,
therefore, be it
RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Pau1 does hereby order that the
above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed
and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it
FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City
officers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to
the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter.
COUNCILPERSONS
Yeas Nays
Benanav /�h�y�}
✓3�lakey
�s trom
+�"01 eman
vKarris
� nt ry
�iter
6 1n F
(� Aqai
l �
Adopted by Council
Certified Passed by
Date a l°l��'
Counci Secretary
or
P�blic Hearing Date — June 24, 1998 RE 5-8-98 e � p
OEPARTMENT/OFFICFJCOUNCIL DAiEINITIA7ED GREEN SHEET NO. `���
Pubtic Works Sidewalks 410.98 iNmnwn� MRIAIJDATE
CONTACT PEPSON 8 PHONE DEPARTMENT DIflECTOR � CITV COUNCIL �
LarryH.Lueth-266-6083 � gcmnnoaNEr �cmci.eaK
MUSTBEONCOUNCILAGENDABY(DAi� S-ZO-JH � ���ETOIpECTOR �FW.&6lGT.SERVICESOIii.
For Public Hearing on 6-24-98 �MAYOP(ORASSISTANT) � Cou�il Research
TOiAL! OF SIGlUNftE PAGES 1 _(CLIP ALL LOCAlIONS FOR SIGNANR� � ASSOCIATE DEP EMAL ACCOUNTANT
ACTION flEWE57ED -Jt7
Reconstruct Sidewalk in Ward 4(See attached list)
REGOMMENDATIONS: Approva (A} w Rejeet (R) pERSONAL SERNCE COMRACTS MUST ANSWEfi THE FOLLOWING Ql7ESS10NS:
PLANNING COMMISSION _�iL SEFVICE COMMISSION 1. H2s ihis E PMSONFI N0 0f Wo(ked ufWO� a CoRtraCt fOf th15 dEparOnent?
Y S
_GIB CAMMITTEE _ 2. H � m � yES � NO er been a ciry emploYee?
A S7AFF 3. tbes ihis person/firm possess a skill not rrormaly possessed by any curcent dty
— employee?
DISTRICTCOUNCIL YES NO
SUPPOq'TS WH7CH CWNCIL OBJECTNE? �P�ain all yes answers on separate sheot and attaeh to green s�eet
INRIATING PFOeLEM, ISSUE, OPPORlUN11Y (WriO, WFiAT, WHEN, WHERE, WFI`n:
The probfem "defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious su6grade material, alternating freefthaw cycles,
service I'rfa limits, chemical add'Aives, e�ctreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a cftywide level and must be
addressed and corrected on an annuai basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condftion would worsen to a state where it would be
rendered unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations.
ADVANTAGESIFAPPROVE�:
The communRy will benefit from this project because it will provide safe detect free sidewalks for its many citizens. The sidewalk
contracts are executed by private contractors, so it foilows ihat private sector jobs are created as a resuft of this activity.
DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED:
Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment.
Simply stated, proQerty owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it still
remains controversiai.
DISADVANTAGES W NOT APPROVED:
This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal injury suits,
uRimately resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in eventual repairs ant'f�/oi repTace'ment, es well as olaim payouts.
� R�sea�ch Center
S�Y 1 � i�98
TOTAL AMOUM OFTflANSACTIONS 1 Z��B ]6 COST/qEVENUE BUDGETED (CIRCLE ONE) YES No
FUNDINGSWHCE gH--M-U6F.lS A PI'A �$, s? �]H (J(}Q ACINfTYNUMBEFi C$-.
FINANCIAL MFORMATION: (EXPLAIN) $. �S'�' � 3'L7 �OOO ^
r� '�,.._ _.-..-._._._._.-...-.� _._.. _" ' _' _ _ '
ex CFB 98 = So,oOo
SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDAT'IONS
Ward 4
/
if�-��_
PROJECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALS B.S. FRY ST. from Englewood Ave.
to Hubbard Ave.
��j��� INITIATING ACTION:
as public necessity on
walk.
This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works
the basis of one {1) complaint and an inspection of the
EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves,
asphalt patches and scaled panels.
...................................................................
PROJECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALH B.S. MARSHALL AVE. from 1�3.
Howell St. to N. Prior Ave.
���IO IDTITIATING ACTION:
as public necessity on
walk.
This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works
the basis of four {4) complaints and an inspection of the
EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves,
asphalt patches, settled and cracked panels.
....................................................... . ..........
PRO.T�CT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALH B.S. N. PRIOR AVE. from Dayton
Ave. to Marshall Ave.
y� C/�' INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of 1'ublic Works
� as public necessity on the basis of one {1) complaint and an inspection of the
walk.
EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves,
asphalt patches and settled panels.
...................................................................
°�� -s y
CITY OF ST. PAUI. COUNCIL FILE NO. �O -Z I� `�
PRELIMINARY ORDER By
File o S9 069 t ru 59807�
Voti g ard 4 �
In the Matter o£ sidewalk reconstruction at the following locations:
598069 - Both sides Fry St from Englewood Ave to Hubbard Ave
S98070 - Both sides Marshall Ave from N Howell St to N Prior Ave
598071 - Both sides N P=ior Ave from Dayton Ave to Marshall Ave
*ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES
RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures)
Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.65 per front foot for a
five (5) foot wide walk and $9.18 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide
walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction
(where no walk existed) - 100°s of the actual cost estimated to be
approximately $3.42 per squara foot.
All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150
feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of
the property.
MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three Pamily structures), NON-RESIDENTrAL RATES
For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100s oP actual cost estimated to be
approximately $4.62 per square foot.
The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon
the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves:
1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives,
and that the estimated cost thereo£ is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction
rates, financed by assessments and 1998 Public Improvement Aid.
2.
3.
That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 24th dav of June, 1998
at 5:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House
Building in the City of Saint Paul.
That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner
provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of
the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated.
COBNCILPERSONS
Yeas Nays
�enanav
t/8lakey
•�os t rom
�oleman
vHarris
vLantry
�iter
� In Favor
�Against
Adopted by Council: Date � ��
Certi£ied Passed by Council Secretary
BY�� 3 ��
\
Mayor
CITY OF ST. PAUL COUNCIL FILE N0. � S R ! O
FINAL ORDER By �
Fi1e 598069 t ru 598070
Vot' g ard 4
In the Matter o£ sidewalk reconstruction at the following locations:
598069 - Both sides Fry St from Englewood Ave to Hubbard Ave
S98070 - Both sides Marshall Ave from N Howell St to N Prior Ave
598071 - Both sides N Prior Ave from Dayton Ave to Marshall Ave
*ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES
RF�SIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures)
Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.65 per front foot for a five (5)
foot wide walk and $9.18 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide
walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction
(where no walk existed) - 1000 of the actual cost estimated to be
approximately 53.42 per square foot.
Al1 corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150
feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "lonq side" of
the property.
MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (MOre than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES
For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100% of actual cost estimated to be
approximately $4.62 per square foot.
under Preliminary order 1� —�� y approved �`t`t�
The Council of the City o£ Saint Paul has conducted a pub ic hearing upon the
above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City
Charter; and
WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations
pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now,
therefore, be it
RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Pau1 does hereby order that the
above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed
and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it
FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City
officers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to
the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter.
COUNCILPERSONS
Yeas Nays
Benanav /�h�y�}
✓3�lakey
�s trom
+�"01 eman
vKarris
� nt ry
�iter
6 1n F
(� Aqai
l �
Adopted by Council
Certified Passed by
Date a l°l��'
Counci Secretary
or
P�blic Hearing Date — June 24, 1998 RE 5-8-98 e � p
OEPARTMENT/OFFICFJCOUNCIL DAiEINITIA7ED GREEN SHEET NO. `���
Pubtic Works Sidewalks 410.98 iNmnwn� MRIAIJDATE
CONTACT PEPSON 8 PHONE DEPARTMENT DIflECTOR � CITV COUNCIL �
LarryH.Lueth-266-6083 � gcmnnoaNEr �cmci.eaK
MUSTBEONCOUNCILAGENDABY(DAi� S-ZO-JH � ���ETOIpECTOR �FW.&6lGT.SERVICESOIii.
For Public Hearing on 6-24-98 �MAYOP(ORASSISTANT) � Cou�il Research
TOiAL! OF SIGlUNftE PAGES 1 _(CLIP ALL LOCAlIONS FOR SIGNANR� � ASSOCIATE DEP EMAL ACCOUNTANT
ACTION flEWE57ED -Jt7
Reconstruct Sidewalk in Ward 4(See attached list)
REGOMMENDATIONS: Approva (A} w Rejeet (R) pERSONAL SERNCE COMRACTS MUST ANSWEfi THE FOLLOWING Ql7ESS10NS:
PLANNING COMMISSION _�iL SEFVICE COMMISSION 1. H2s ihis E PMSONFI N0 0f Wo(ked ufWO� a CoRtraCt fOf th15 dEparOnent?
Y S
_GIB CAMMITTEE _ 2. H � m � yES � NO er been a ciry emploYee?
A S7AFF 3. tbes ihis person/firm possess a skill not rrormaly possessed by any curcent dty
— employee?
DISTRICTCOUNCIL YES NO
SUPPOq'TS WH7CH CWNCIL OBJECTNE? �P�ain all yes answers on separate sheot and attaeh to green s�eet
INRIATING PFOeLEM, ISSUE, OPPORlUN11Y (WriO, WFiAT, WHEN, WHERE, WFI`n:
The probfem "defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious su6grade material, alternating freefthaw cycles,
service I'rfa limits, chemical add'Aives, e�ctreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a cftywide level and must be
addressed and corrected on an annuai basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condftion would worsen to a state where it would be
rendered unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations.
ADVANTAGESIFAPPROVE�:
The communRy will benefit from this project because it will provide safe detect free sidewalks for its many citizens. The sidewalk
contracts are executed by private contractors, so it foilows ihat private sector jobs are created as a resuft of this activity.
DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED:
Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment.
Simply stated, proQerty owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it still
remains controversiai.
DISADVANTAGES W NOT APPROVED:
This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal injury suits,
uRimately resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in eventual repairs ant'f�/oi repTace'ment, es well as olaim payouts.
� R�sea�ch Center
S�Y 1 � i�98
TOTAL AMOUM OFTflANSACTIONS 1 Z��B ]6 COST/qEVENUE BUDGETED (CIRCLE ONE) YES No
FUNDINGSWHCE gH--M-U6F.lS A PI'A �$, s? �]H (J(}Q ACINfTYNUMBEFi C$-.
FINANCIAL MFORMATION: (EXPLAIN) $. �S'�' � 3'L7 �OOO ^
r� '�,.._ _.-..-._._._._.-...-.� _._.. _" ' _' _ _ '
ex CFB 98 = So,oOo
SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDAT'IONS
Ward 4
/
if�-��_
PROJECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALS B.S. FRY ST. from Englewood Ave.
to Hubbard Ave.
��j��� INITIATING ACTION:
as public necessity on
walk.
This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works
the basis of one {1) complaint and an inspection of the
EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves,
asphalt patches and scaled panels.
...................................................................
PROJECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALH B.S. MARSHALL AVE. from 1�3.
Howell St. to N. Prior Ave.
���IO IDTITIATING ACTION:
as public necessity on
walk.
This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works
the basis of four {4) complaints and an inspection of the
EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves,
asphalt patches, settled and cracked panels.
....................................................... . ..........
PRO.T�CT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALH B.S. N. PRIOR AVE. from Dayton
Ave. to Marshall Ave.
y� C/�' INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of 1'ublic Works
� as public necessity on the basis of one {1) complaint and an inspection of the
walk.
EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves,
asphalt patches and settled panels.
...................................................................
°�� -s y
CITY OF ST. PAUI. COUNCIL FILE NO. �O -Z I� `�
PRELIMINARY ORDER By
File o S9 069 t ru 59807�
Voti g ard 4 �
In the Matter o£ sidewalk reconstruction at the following locations:
598069 - Both sides Fry St from Englewood Ave to Hubbard Ave
S98070 - Both sides Marshall Ave from N Howell St to N Prior Ave
598071 - Both sides N P=ior Ave from Dayton Ave to Marshall Ave
*ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES
RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures)
Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.65 per front foot for a
five (5) foot wide walk and $9.18 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide
walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction
(where no walk existed) - 100°s of the actual cost estimated to be
approximately $3.42 per squara foot.
All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150
feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of
the property.
MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three Pamily structures), NON-RESIDENTrAL RATES
For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100s oP actual cost estimated to be
approximately $4.62 per square foot.
The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon
the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves:
1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives,
and that the estimated cost thereo£ is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction
rates, financed by assessments and 1998 Public Improvement Aid.
2.
3.
That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 24th dav of June, 1998
at 5:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House
Building in the City of Saint Paul.
That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner
provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of
the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated.
COBNCILPERSONS
Yeas Nays
�enanav
t/8lakey
•�os t rom
�oleman
vHarris
vLantry
�iter
� In Favor
�Against
Adopted by Council: Date � ��
Certi£ied Passed by Council Secretary
BY�� 3 ��
\
Mayor