The URL can be used to link to this page

98-573Gq CITY OF ST. PAUL FINAL ORDER COUNCSL FILE NO._ "lS � ��E�� /� • • . � � � • o • / In the Matter oE sidemalk reconstruction at the following locations: S98065 - East side N Dale St from Ashland Ave to Laurel Ave and West side N Dale St from Ashland Ave to Hague Ave S98066 - Both sides N Dunlap St from Sherburne Ave to Charles Ave and South side Charles Ave from N Griggs St to N Dunlap St S98067 - Both sides Selby Ave from N Milton St to N Victoria St 598068 - Both sides Thomas Ave from Farrington St to Marion St �g -S�13 *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES {One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $9.1$ per front foot for a six (6) foot wide wa1k. A11 other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100g of the actual cost estimated to be approximately 53.42 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "lonq side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (MOre than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100s of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.62 per square foot. under Preliminary order � 0—� approved� � The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a pu ic hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been qiven as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Pau1 does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays Benanav�- R�yse_v.� ✓Blakey ,/�ostrom ��01 eman �arris �/Lantry t/tteiter � In Favor � Against �� N�s�V�.� Adopted by Council: Date a \��$� Certified Passed by Council Secretary By Mayor Fublic Hearing Date — June 24, 1998 RE 5-20-98 DEPAAiMEN7fOFFICEJCOUNCiL DA7EINITIATED GREEN SHEET NO 38� Public Works Sidewalks 410-98 lNIT1AL10ATE �1QfA4fDATE CONTACTPERSONBPNONE �pFpppTMENTDIRECTOP �CITYCOUNCIL ��o� LarryH.lueth-266-6083 �N �CfTYATTOflNEY cmcaEaic NUMBERFOR MUSTBEONCOUNCIIAGENDABY(DAlE} S-�LO-9H � �BUDGETDIRECTOP FW.&MOT.SFAYK;ESDiR, For Public Hearing on 6-24-98 �MAYOR(ORASSISTANi) OCouncil Research TOLLL l OF SIGNATURE PAGES 1 _(C4P ALL LOCATIONS FOR 9GNANRE} � ASSOC�A7E RiMENTAL ACCOUMANT ACTbNflEWESiED � ' D�q Reconstruct Sidewaik in Ward t{See attached list) ✓ � � � RE MENDA"�NS: App�are (N a pajea iR7 PERSONAL SERNCE CONfRACTS NU5T ANSWER THE FOLLOWING �UF5f10NS: _PLANNINGCOMMISSION _ 1. }135171iSpe Y cie CoMMrt7EE 2. Ffas ihis persoruFrtn ever been a ciry employee? — — YES NO A STAFF 3. Ooes Mis person�irm possess a skill irot rrormaly possessed by are� cunent ciry DISTflICT WUNCIL �� YES NO SUPPoRTS WHICH CWNCIL OBJECTNE? �P�� eP yes ansxrors on Sepafate Sheet and attaCh W glBB� she6t MITIATING PROBLEM.ISSUE.OPPOAT1Nftt (Wr10. WHAT. WHEN, WHERE, WH`�: The problem "detective sidewalk" was created because oi tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, afternating freeftfiaw cycles, service 1'rfe limits, chemical additives, eutreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a cdywide level and must be addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusabie and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations. ADVANTAGES IF APPROVED: The community will benetft trom this project because it will provide safe detect free sidewalks for its many cftizens. The sidewalk contracts are executed by private contractors, so it follows that private sector jobs are created as a resuR of ihis activity. DISPDVANTRGES ff PPPROVED: Nistorica�iy, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment. Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fac[ up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it still remains controversial. DISACIVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED: This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock fo deteriorate, which in turn, will �e__nerate more pergo�al injury_ suits, ultimately resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounis in eventual repairs and/or repiacement, as weli as claim payouts. �SS91�Ch �'r�R#�f MAY 1 �.199$ TOTALAMOUNTOFTRANSACTION$ " 33i7Z • OZ fAST/HEVENUEBUDGETED(CIfiCLEONE) YE5 No FUNDINOSOURCE �$'if'�'�� , P�� 9 ° � �Q�� ACINRYNUMBER �98�T35� ^0784'^Q4�� FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (EXPLAIN) . — # _ � "' � C, Cha 98 = 56'tOQO �-�---�--a-�.--��_.��___... �..._._.: SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATIONS Ward 1 = �:�i�r� PROJECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK E.S. IV. DALE ST. from Ashland Ave. to Laurel Ave. & W.S. N. DAI.E ST. from Ashland Ave. to Fiague Ave. ?� (�(j, INITIATING ACTIOl�i: This order was initiated by the I7irector of Public Works ��(� as public necessity on the basis of two (2} complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIOI�TS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, disintegrated, scaled settled and cracked panels. ................................................................... PROJECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. N. DCJNLAP ST. from Sherburne Ave. to Charles Ave. & S.S. CI3ARLES AVE. from N. Griggs St. to N. Dunlap St. ��0�(� INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint, a petition with one (1) signer and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, scaled and settled panels. ................................................................. PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. SELBY AVE. from N.Milton St. to N. Victoria St. ? „,� `�� INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works �V as public necessity on the basis of two (2j complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is old tile and poured concrete with tree heaves, broken tile, holes in tile, asphalt patches, scaled, settled and cracked panels. ................................................................... PROJECT: RECONSTRtICT SIDEWALK B.S. THOMAS AVE. from Farrington St. to Marion St. C�Nl� I1vITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works � �� as public necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint, a petition with one (1} signer and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, scaled, settled and cracked panels. .................................................................. CITY OF ST. PAUI. • �� . COUNCIL � - File in the Matter oP sidewalk reconstruction at the £ollowing locations: S98065 - East side N Dale St £rom Ashland Ave to Laurel Ave and West side N Dale St from Ashland Ave to Hague Ave S98066 - Both sides N Dunlap St from Sherburne Ave to Charles Ave and South side Charles Ave from N Griggs St to N Dunlap St S98067 - Both sides Selby Ave from N Milton St to N Victoria St 598068 - Both sides Thomas Ave £rom Farrington St to Marion St *ES`PIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction ireplacement of old sidewalk) -$'I.65 per front Poot for a five (5) foot wide walk and 59.18 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100% of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.42 per square £oot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the Pirst 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abuttinq the "long side" of the property. gg - s�.3 28 MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.62 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves; 1 2 3 That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1998 Public Improvement Aid. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 24th day of June, 1998 at 5:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearinq be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays ✓�B nanav ✓B�.akey ✓ ostrom ✓Eoleman :/�iarris ✓Lantry r�eiter 1 In Favor � Against Adopted by Council: Date � f � e `y�� Certified Passed by Council Secretary By I— a �,� � -�-.� Gq CITY OF ST. PAUL FINAL ORDER COUNCSL FILE NO._ "lS � ��E�� /� • • . � � � • o • / In the Matter oE sidemalk reconstruction at the following locations: S98065 - East side N Dale St from Ashland Ave to Laurel Ave and West side N Dale St from Ashland Ave to Hague Ave S98066 - Both sides N Dunlap St from Sherburne Ave to Charles Ave and South side Charles Ave from N Griggs St to N Dunlap St S98067 - Both sides Selby Ave from N Milton St to N Victoria St 598068 - Both sides Thomas Ave from Farrington St to Marion St �g -S�13 *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES {One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $9.1$ per front foot for a six (6) foot wide wa1k. A11 other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100g of the actual cost estimated to be approximately 53.42 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "lonq side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (MOre than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100s of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.62 per square foot. under Preliminary order � 0—� approved� � The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a pu ic hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been qiven as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Pau1 does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays Benanav�- R�yse_v.� ✓Blakey ,/�ostrom ��01 eman �arris �/Lantry t/tteiter � In Favor � Against �� N�s�V�.� Adopted by Council: Date a \��$� Certified Passed by Council Secretary By Mayor Fublic Hearing Date — June 24, 1998 RE 5-20-98 DEPAAiMEN7fOFFICEJCOUNCiL DA7EINITIATED GREEN SHEET NO 38� Public Works Sidewalks 410-98 lNIT1AL10ATE �1QfA4fDATE CONTACTPERSONBPNONE �pFpppTMENTDIRECTOP �CITYCOUNCIL ��o� LarryH.lueth-266-6083 �N �CfTYATTOflNEY cmcaEaic NUMBERFOR MUSTBEONCOUNCIIAGENDABY(DAlE} S-�LO-9H � �BUDGETDIRECTOP FW.&MOT.SFAYK;ESDiR, For Public Hearing on 6-24-98 �MAYOR(ORASSISTANi) OCouncil Research TOLLL l OF SIGNATURE PAGES 1 _(C4P ALL LOCATIONS FOR 9GNANRE} � ASSOC�A7E RiMENTAL ACCOUMANT ACTbNflEWESiED � ' D�q Reconstruct Sidewaik in Ward t{See attached list) ✓ � � � RE MENDA"�NS: App�are (N a pajea iR7 PERSONAL SERNCE CONfRACTS NU5T ANSWER THE FOLLOWING �UF5f10NS: _PLANNINGCOMMISSION _ 1. }135171iSpe Y cie CoMMrt7EE 2. Ffas ihis persoruFrtn ever been a ciry employee? — — YES NO A STAFF 3. Ooes Mis person�irm possess a skill irot rrormaly possessed by are� cunent ciry DISTflICT WUNCIL �� YES NO SUPPoRTS WHICH CWNCIL OBJECTNE? �P�� eP yes ansxrors on Sepafate Sheet and attaCh W glBB� she6t MITIATING PROBLEM.ISSUE.OPPOAT1Nftt (Wr10. WHAT. WHEN, WHERE, WH`�: The problem "detective sidewalk" was created because oi tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, afternating freeftfiaw cycles, service 1'rfe limits, chemical additives, eutreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a cdywide level and must be addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusabie and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations. ADVANTAGES IF APPROVED: The community will benetft trom this project because it will provide safe detect free sidewalks for its many cftizens. The sidewalk contracts are executed by private contractors, so it follows that private sector jobs are created as a resuR of ihis activity. DISPDVANTRGES ff PPPROVED: Nistorica�iy, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment. Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fac[ up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it still remains controversial. DISACIVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED: This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock fo deteriorate, which in turn, will �e__nerate more pergo�al injury_ suits, ultimately resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounis in eventual repairs and/or repiacement, as weli as claim payouts. �SS91�Ch �'r�R#�f MAY 1 �.199$ TOTALAMOUNTOFTRANSACTION$ " 33i7Z • OZ fAST/HEVENUEBUDGETED(CIfiCLEONE) YE5 No FUNDINOSOURCE �$'if'�'�� , P�� 9 ° � �Q�� ACINRYNUMBER �98�T35� ^0784'^Q4�� FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (EXPLAIN) . — # _ � "' � C, Cha 98 = 56'tOQO �-�---�--a-�.--��_.��___... �..._._.: SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATIONS Ward 1 = �:�i�r� PROJECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK E.S. IV. DALE ST. from Ashland Ave. to Laurel Ave. & W.S. N. DAI.E ST. from Ashland Ave. to Fiague Ave. ?� (�(j, INITIATING ACTIOl�i: This order was initiated by the I7irector of Public Works ��(� as public necessity on the basis of two (2} complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIOI�TS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, disintegrated, scaled settled and cracked panels. ................................................................... PROJECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. N. DCJNLAP ST. from Sherburne Ave. to Charles Ave. & S.S. CI3ARLES AVE. from N. Griggs St. to N. Dunlap St. ��0�(� INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint, a petition with one (1) signer and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, scaled and settled panels. ................................................................. PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. SELBY AVE. from N.Milton St. to N. Victoria St. ? „,� `�� INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works �V as public necessity on the basis of two (2j complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is old tile and poured concrete with tree heaves, broken tile, holes in tile, asphalt patches, scaled, settled and cracked panels. ................................................................... PROJECT: RECONSTRtICT SIDEWALK B.S. THOMAS AVE. from Farrington St. to Marion St. C�Nl� I1vITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works � �� as public necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint, a petition with one (1} signer and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, scaled, settled and cracked panels. .................................................................. CITY OF ST. PAUI. • �� . COUNCIL � - File in the Matter oP sidewalk reconstruction at the £ollowing locations: S98065 - East side N Dale St £rom Ashland Ave to Laurel Ave and West side N Dale St from Ashland Ave to Hague Ave S98066 - Both sides N Dunlap St from Sherburne Ave to Charles Ave and South side Charles Ave from N Griggs St to N Dunlap St S98067 - Both sides Selby Ave from N Milton St to N Victoria St 598068 - Both sides Thomas Ave £rom Farrington St to Marion St *ES`PIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction ireplacement of old sidewalk) -$'I.65 per front Poot for a five (5) foot wide walk and 59.18 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100% of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.42 per square £oot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the Pirst 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abuttinq the "long side" of the property. gg - s�.3 28 MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.62 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves; 1 2 3 That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1998 Public Improvement Aid. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 24th day of June, 1998 at 5:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearinq be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays ✓�B nanav ✓B�.akey ✓ ostrom ✓Eoleman :/�iarris ✓Lantry r�eiter 1 In Favor � Against Adopted by Council: Date � f � e `y�� Certified Passed by Council Secretary By I— a �,� � -�-.� Gq CITY OF ST. PAUL FINAL ORDER COUNCSL FILE NO._ "lS � ��E�� /� • • . � � � • o • / In the Matter oE sidemalk reconstruction at the following locations: S98065 - East side N Dale St from Ashland Ave to Laurel Ave and West side N Dale St from Ashland Ave to Hague Ave S98066 - Both sides N Dunlap St from Sherburne Ave to Charles Ave and South side Charles Ave from N Griggs St to N Dunlap St S98067 - Both sides Selby Ave from N Milton St to N Victoria St 598068 - Both sides Thomas Ave from Farrington St to Marion St �g -S�13 *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES {One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $9.1$ per front foot for a six (6) foot wide wa1k. A11 other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100g of the actual cost estimated to be approximately 53.42 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "lonq side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (MOre than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100s of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.62 per square foot. under Preliminary order � 0—� approved� � The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a pu ic hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been qiven as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Pau1 does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays Benanav�- R�yse_v.� ✓Blakey ,/�ostrom ��01 eman �arris �/Lantry t/tteiter � In Favor � Against �� N�s�V�.� Adopted by Council: Date a \��$� Certified Passed by Council Secretary By Mayor Fublic Hearing Date — June 24, 1998 RE 5-20-98 DEPAAiMEN7fOFFICEJCOUNCiL DA7EINITIATED GREEN SHEET NO 38� Public Works Sidewalks 410-98 lNIT1AL10ATE �1QfA4fDATE CONTACTPERSONBPNONE �pFpppTMENTDIRECTOP �CITYCOUNCIL ��o� LarryH.lueth-266-6083 �N �CfTYATTOflNEY cmcaEaic NUMBERFOR MUSTBEONCOUNCIIAGENDABY(DAlE} S-�LO-9H � �BUDGETDIRECTOP FW.&MOT.SFAYK;ESDiR, For Public Hearing on 6-24-98 �MAYOR(ORASSISTANi) OCouncil Research TOLLL l OF SIGNATURE PAGES 1 _(C4P ALL LOCATIONS FOR 9GNANRE} � ASSOC�A7E RiMENTAL ACCOUMANT ACTbNflEWESiED � ' D�q Reconstruct Sidewaik in Ward t{See attached list) ✓ � � � RE MENDA"�NS: App�are (N a pajea iR7 PERSONAL SERNCE CONfRACTS NU5T ANSWER THE FOLLOWING �UF5f10NS: _PLANNINGCOMMISSION _ 1. }135171iSpe Y cie CoMMrt7EE 2. Ffas ihis persoruFrtn ever been a ciry employee? — — YES NO A STAFF 3. Ooes Mis person�irm possess a skill irot rrormaly possessed by are� cunent ciry DISTflICT WUNCIL �� YES NO SUPPoRTS WHICH CWNCIL OBJECTNE? �P�� eP yes ansxrors on Sepafate Sheet and attaCh W glBB� she6t MITIATING PROBLEM.ISSUE.OPPOAT1Nftt (Wr10. WHAT. WHEN, WHERE, WH`�: The problem "detective sidewalk" was created because oi tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, afternating freeftfiaw cycles, service 1'rfe limits, chemical additives, eutreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a cdywide level and must be addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusabie and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations. ADVANTAGES IF APPROVED: The community will benetft trom this project because it will provide safe detect free sidewalks for its many cftizens. The sidewalk contracts are executed by private contractors, so it follows that private sector jobs are created as a resuR of ihis activity. DISPDVANTRGES ff PPPROVED: Nistorica�iy, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment. Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fac[ up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it still remains controversial. DISACIVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED: This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock fo deteriorate, which in turn, will �e__nerate more pergo�al injury_ suits, ultimately resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounis in eventual repairs and/or repiacement, as weli as claim payouts. �SS91�Ch �'r�R#�f MAY 1 �.199$ TOTALAMOUNTOFTRANSACTION$ " 33i7Z • OZ fAST/HEVENUEBUDGETED(CIfiCLEONE) YE5 No FUNDINOSOURCE �$'if'�'�� , P�� 9 ° � �Q�� ACINRYNUMBER �98�T35� ^0784'^Q4�� FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (EXPLAIN) . — # _ � "' � C, Cha 98 = 56'tOQO �-�---�--a-�.--��_.��___... �..._._.: SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATIONS Ward 1 = �:�i�r� PROJECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK E.S. IV. DALE ST. from Ashland Ave. to Laurel Ave. & W.S. N. DAI.E ST. from Ashland Ave. to Fiague Ave. ?� (�(j, INITIATING ACTIOl�i: This order was initiated by the I7irector of Public Works ��(� as public necessity on the basis of two (2} complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIOI�TS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, disintegrated, scaled settled and cracked panels. ................................................................... PROJECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. N. DCJNLAP ST. from Sherburne Ave. to Charles Ave. & S.S. CI3ARLES AVE. from N. Griggs St. to N. Dunlap St. ��0�(� INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint, a petition with one (1) signer and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, scaled and settled panels. ................................................................. PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. SELBY AVE. from N.Milton St. to N. Victoria St. ? „,� `�� INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works �V as public necessity on the basis of two (2j complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is old tile and poured concrete with tree heaves, broken tile, holes in tile, asphalt patches, scaled, settled and cracked panels. ................................................................... PROJECT: RECONSTRtICT SIDEWALK B.S. THOMAS AVE. from Farrington St. to Marion St. C�Nl� I1vITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works � �� as public necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint, a petition with one (1} signer and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, scaled, settled and cracked panels. .................................................................. CITY OF ST. PAUI. • �� . COUNCIL � - File in the Matter oP sidewalk reconstruction at the £ollowing locations: S98065 - East side N Dale St £rom Ashland Ave to Laurel Ave and West side N Dale St from Ashland Ave to Hague Ave S98066 - Both sides N Dunlap St from Sherburne Ave to Charles Ave and South side Charles Ave from N Griggs St to N Dunlap St S98067 - Both sides Selby Ave from N Milton St to N Victoria St 598068 - Both sides Thomas Ave £rom Farrington St to Marion St *ES`PIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction ireplacement of old sidewalk) -$'I.65 per front Poot for a five (5) foot wide walk and 59.18 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100% of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.42 per square £oot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the Pirst 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abuttinq the "long side" of the property. gg - s�.3 28 MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.62 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves; 1 2 3 That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1998 Public Improvement Aid. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 24th day of June, 1998 at 5:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearinq be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays ✓�B nanav ✓B�.akey ✓ ostrom ✓Eoleman :/�iarris ✓Lantry r�eiter 1 In Favor � Against Adopted by Council: Date � f � e `y�� Certified Passed by Council Secretary By I— a �,� � -�-.�