The URL can be used to link to this page

98-572CITY OF ST . PAUL '\� rC�� - � �a� � qY C L£ LE O �g - s R a. �� FINAL ORDER By File No. S SO 1 thru 598064 Voting Ward 3 In the Matter o£ sidemalk reconstruction at the folloming locations: S98051 - Both sides Goodrich Avenue Prom S Hamline Ave to S Syndicate St S98052 - Both sides S Hamline Avenue from James Ave to Randolph Ave 598053 - East side S Hamlilne Ave from Watson Ave to Bayard Ave and West side S Aamline Ave from Hartford Ave to Bayard Ave S98054 - Both sides James Ave from S Albert to S Hamline 598055 - Both sides Lincoln Ave from S Syndicate St to approximately 360 ft� East of S Syndicate St Lci��i over �-o J.,, l G:-!y C>uN�:� YM1i�y. 598056 - Both sides Macalester St from Palace to Juliet ° �� 598057 - Both sides Osceola Ave from S Snelling Ave to S Saratoga St an��"`�"� o�=r � West side S Saratoga St from Fairmount Ave to Osceola Ave �" � C ` - ��\ �=cy� i +� Nc� . U 598058 - Both sides S Pascal St from Palace Ave to Randolph Ave S98059 - Both sides St Clair from S Albert St to Pascal St L4,i� Ov�r� 598060 - North side St Clair Ave from S Saratoga St to S Pascal St and '�j�, G� South side St Clair Ave from Warwick St to S Pascal St �� `� 598061 - Both sides S Saratoga St from Lincoln Ave to Goodrich Ave �� S98062 - Both sides Sargent Ave from S Albert St to S Hamline Ave 598063 - South side Scheffer Ave from S Hamlline Ave to West 105 ft at 657 S Hamline Ave only 598064 - Both sides Stanford Ave from S Albert St to S Pascal St. �8 -s�2- *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) - 57.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $9.18 per front foot £or a six (6) £oot wide wa1k. A11 other widths wi11 be prorated accordingly, New construction (where no walk existed) - 1000 of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.42 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (MOre than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.62 per square foot. under Preliminary order `p - �'3� approved �� q,� The Council of the City of Saint Pau1 has conducted a pu ic hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City of£icers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPER50NS Yeas Nays Benanav-�- (1� �lakey �strom ✓C.oleman �rris �/Lantry �iter Adopted by Council Certified Passed by Date�\\„_,_, �y�� Coun `��Secretary (o In Favor By �Against Mayor 1 ��osey�,� Public Hearing Date — June 24, 1998 RE 5-8-9& e DEPAR7MENT10FFICFJCOUNCIL DATEIMITIATED GREEN SHEET NO. `yoJ� Public Works Sidewalks 4'3'98 INITIAWATE INITIAVDATE CANTACTPERSON8PHONE �DEPAFiTMENTDIflECTOfl �qTYCOUNCIL � Larry H. Lueth - 266-6083 �GN �CIiY ATTOftNEY �CINCLERK NU4HER FOp MUST9EONCOUNCILAGENDABV�OA'1E) S-ZO-9H RQ�� gUDCETDIRECTOR �FIN.&MGLSERVICESOIp. For Public Hearing on 6-24-98 �MAYoR(08ASSlSTANi� 0 Cour�ci4 Research TOTqL f OF SIGNAS{1PE PAGES 1 _(CIIP ALL LOCAiIONS Wit SIGNf�TURE) � ASSOCIA7E A� EFC�ALACCOUNTAM MTqN REWESTED Reconstruct Sidewalk in Ward 3(See attached list) REWMMENDATIONS: Gypiare (A) a Rejact (R) pER50NAt SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWEfl THE FOLLOWING DI.lEST10NS: _PLaNWNGCOMMISSIINJ _CNILSERVICECOMMISSION �� m15�S� NO�WOrk2dunderacoMrectiorUlisdepazttn¢rtt? cIB COMMfiTEE 2� Has ihis persoNfimf ever been a City employee? — — YES NO j? S7qFF 3. Does Uiis person/firm possess a skill not rrormafy possessed by any current ciry emp{oyee? �ISTRICTCOUNGI YES NO SUPPOHiS WH�cH CoUNCiL OelECTNE? �P��^ 8�� Yes answers on separate sheet and atfach to green shaet INRIATING PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPORNNITV (WHO. WFiAT. WHEN. WHERE, WHY): The problem "defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, de�eterious subgrade material, aRernating freeRhaw cycles, service frfe limits, cfiemicaV addftives, e�reme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a ciiywide level and must be addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condftion would worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusable and subjec[ to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations. ADVANTAGESIFAPPROVED: The cummunfty will benefit from this project because it will provide safe detect free sidewalks for Rs many citizens. The sidewalk contracts are executed by private contractors, so it foflows that private sector jobs are created as a resuk of this activity. DISADVAN7AGES IF APPROVED: Historically, the sidewafk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment. Slmply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half the assessment is Gity subsidized, it still remains coniroversial. OISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPAOVED: This opSion would allow the infrasiructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, wi(I generate more personal injury suits, uRimately resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in eventuai-repairs•ar�d/ar-replacament as ciaim payouts. Counr�9 Research Cer�ter MAY 111998 TOTALAMWNTOFTRANSACTION$ 7] jO7 8H COST/REVENUEBUDGETED(CIBCLEOHE) YES NO WNDMGSOUFCE �$°M^466$ A PtA 98 ? 6�$��a pCYfVYTYNUMBER � 8-2f ��^� sti^�0 . FINANCIAL INFOqMAT10N: (EXPUiIN) B a , AS� S 32S�OOO C, Gts 98 = 5a �___.._....�.w.,�.�_......_. .. __: , SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENBATTONS Ward 3 ��.�'��r � PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALIi B.S. GOODRICH AVE. from S. Hamline Ave. to S. Syndicate St. s�' IlNITIATIlNG ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIpNS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, disintegrated and settled panels. ................................................................................ PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALH B. S. S. HAMLINE AVE. from James Ave. to Randolph Ave. 5 � n2 INITIATING ACTIQN; This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public � w' necessity on the basis of three (3) complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with asphalt patches, scaled, settled and cracked panels. ................................................................................ PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWAI.K E.S. S. HAMLIATE AVE. from Watson Ave. to Bayard Ave. & W.S. S. HAMLINE AVE. from Hartford Ave. to Bayard Ave. � �{ y9� INIT7ATING ACTION: This order was uutiated by the Director of Public Works as public E W� necessity on the basis of one (1� complaint and an inspection of the walk. � �� ^ I � i� EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, scaled and settled panels. PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. JAMES AVE. from S. Albert St. to S. Hamline Ave. INITIATIIITG ACTION: This order was uutiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of two (2) complaints and an inspection of the wALk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, scaled, settled and cracked panels. PRO.IECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. LINCOLN AVE. from S. Syndicate St. to Approximately 360' E. of S. Syndciate St. IIvITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint, a petition with one (1) signer and an inspection of the walk. ERISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, settled and cracked panels. PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. MACALEST'ER ST, from Palace Ave, to Juliet Ave. `��' -S��... c 9 � - � 27 CITY OF ST. PAUL COU I I O. y,3 �_ PREL2MINARY ORDER By Fi e No. S D51 thru 598064 Voting Ward 3 In the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction at the following locations: S98051 - Both sides Goodrich Avenue from S Hamline Ave to S Syndicate St 598052 - Both sides S Hamline Avenue £rom James Ave to Randolgh Ave S98053 - East side S Hamline Ave from Watson Ave to Bayard Ave and West side S Ham.line Ave from Hartford Ave to Bayard Ave. S98054 - Both sides James Ave from S�Albert to S Hamline 598055 - Both sides Lincoln Ave £rom S Syndicate St to approximately 360 ft East of S Syndicate St. 598056 - Both sides Macalester 5t Prom Palace Ave to Juliet Ave 598057 - Both si@es Osceola Ave from S Snelling Ave to S Saratoga St and West side S Saratoga St from Fairmount Ave to Osceola Ave 598058 - Soth sides S Pascal St from Palace Ave to Randolph Ave 598059 - Both sides St Clair Ave £rom S Albert St to S Pascal St 598060 - North side St Clair Ave from S Saratoga St to S Pascal St and South side St Clair Ave £rom Warwick St to S Pascal St S98061 - Soth sides S Saratoga St from Lincoln Ave to Goodrich Ave 598062 - Both sides Sargent Ave from S Albert St to S Hamline Ave S98063 - South side Scheffer Ave from S Hamline Ave to West 105 ft at 657 S Hamline Ave only 598064 - Both sides Stanford Ave from S Albert St to 5 Pascal St. ��y3z �,�- *ESTIMA2ED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) - 57.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and 59.18 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. A11 other widths will be prorated accordingly. 2dew construction (where no walk existed) - 100$ of the actual cost estimated to be approximately S3.A2 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), N6N-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.62 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report o£ the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1 � 3 That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereo£ is *SEE ABOVE £or estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1998 Puhlic Improvement Aid. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 24th d�v of .i„ne 399A at 5:30 o'clock P.M.. in the Council Chambers of the City Aall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCTLPERSONS Yeas Nays ✓Benanav �/Blakey �ostrom �oleman �arris �antry ✓iieiter �In Favor �Against Adopted by Council: Date_�� Certified Passed by Council cretary Bp � a - Y`_'��-`� — Mayor CITY OF ST . PAUL '\� rC�� - � �a� � qY C L£ LE O �g - s R a. �� FINAL ORDER By File No. S SO 1 thru 598064 Voting Ward 3 In the Matter o£ sidemalk reconstruction at the folloming locations: S98051 - Both sides Goodrich Avenue Prom S Hamline Ave to S Syndicate St S98052 - Both sides S Hamline Avenue from James Ave to Randolph Ave 598053 - East side S Hamlilne Ave from Watson Ave to Bayard Ave and West side S Aamline Ave from Hartford Ave to Bayard Ave S98054 - Both sides James Ave from S Albert to S Hamline 598055 - Both sides Lincoln Ave from S Syndicate St to approximately 360 ft� East of S Syndicate St Lci��i over �-o J.,, l G:-!y C>uN�:� YM1i�y. 598056 - Both sides Macalester St from Palace to Juliet ° �� 598057 - Both sides Osceola Ave from S Snelling Ave to S Saratoga St an��"`�"� o�=r � West side S Saratoga St from Fairmount Ave to Osceola Ave �" � C ` - ��\ �=cy� i +� Nc� . U 598058 - Both sides S Pascal St from Palace Ave to Randolph Ave S98059 - Both sides St Clair from S Albert St to Pascal St L4,i� Ov�r� 598060 - North side St Clair Ave from S Saratoga St to S Pascal St and '�j�, G� South side St Clair Ave from Warwick St to S Pascal St �� `� 598061 - Both sides S Saratoga St from Lincoln Ave to Goodrich Ave �� S98062 - Both sides Sargent Ave from S Albert St to S Hamline Ave 598063 - South side Scheffer Ave from S Hamlline Ave to West 105 ft at 657 S Hamline Ave only 598064 - Both sides Stanford Ave from S Albert St to S Pascal St. �8 -s�2- *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) - 57.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $9.18 per front foot £or a six (6) £oot wide wa1k. A11 other widths wi11 be prorated accordingly, New construction (where no walk existed) - 1000 of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.42 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (MOre than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.62 per square foot. under Preliminary order `p - �'3� approved �� q,� The Council of the City of Saint Pau1 has conducted a pu ic hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City of£icers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPER50NS Yeas Nays Benanav-�- (1� �lakey �strom ✓C.oleman �rris �/Lantry �iter Adopted by Council Certified Passed by Date�\\„_,_, �y�� Coun `��Secretary (o In Favor By �Against Mayor 1 ��osey�,� Public Hearing Date — June 24, 1998 RE 5-8-9& e DEPAR7MENT10FFICFJCOUNCIL DATEIMITIATED GREEN SHEET NO. `yoJ� Public Works Sidewalks 4'3'98 INITIAWATE INITIAVDATE CANTACTPERSON8PHONE �DEPAFiTMENTDIflECTOfl �qTYCOUNCIL � Larry H. Lueth - 266-6083 �GN �CIiY ATTOftNEY �CINCLERK NU4HER FOp MUST9EONCOUNCILAGENDABV�OA'1E) S-ZO-9H RQ�� gUDCETDIRECTOR �FIN.&MGLSERVICESOIp. For Public Hearing on 6-24-98 �MAYoR(08ASSlSTANi� 0 Cour�ci4 Research TOTqL f OF SIGNAS{1PE PAGES 1 _(CIIP ALL LOCAiIONS Wit SIGNf�TURE) � ASSOCIA7E A� EFC�ALACCOUNTAM MTqN REWESTED Reconstruct Sidewalk in Ward 3(See attached list) REWMMENDATIONS: Gypiare (A) a Rejact (R) pER50NAt SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWEfl THE FOLLOWING DI.lEST10NS: _PLaNWNGCOMMISSIINJ _CNILSERVICECOMMISSION �� m15�S� NO�WOrk2dunderacoMrectiorUlisdepazttn¢rtt? cIB COMMfiTEE 2� Has ihis persoNfimf ever been a City employee? — — YES NO j? S7qFF 3. Does Uiis person/firm possess a skill not rrormafy possessed by any current ciry emp{oyee? �ISTRICTCOUNGI YES NO SUPPOHiS WH�cH CoUNCiL OelECTNE? �P��^ 8�� Yes answers on separate sheet and atfach to green shaet INRIATING PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPORNNITV (WHO. WFiAT. WHEN. WHERE, WHY): The problem "defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, de�eterious subgrade material, aRernating freeRhaw cycles, service frfe limits, cfiemicaV addftives, e�reme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a ciiywide level and must be addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condftion would worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusable and subjec[ to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations. ADVANTAGESIFAPPROVED: The cummunfty will benefit from this project because it will provide safe detect free sidewalks for Rs many citizens. The sidewalk contracts are executed by private contractors, so it foflows that private sector jobs are created as a resuk of this activity. DISADVAN7AGES IF APPROVED: Historically, the sidewafk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment. Slmply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half the assessment is Gity subsidized, it still remains coniroversial. OISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPAOVED: This opSion would allow the infrasiructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, wi(I generate more personal injury suits, uRimately resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in eventuai-repairs•ar�d/ar-replacament as ciaim payouts. Counr�9 Research Cer�ter MAY 111998 TOTALAMWNTOFTRANSACTION$ 7] jO7 8H COST/REVENUEBUDGETED(CIBCLEOHE) YES NO WNDMGSOUFCE �$°M^466$ A PtA 98 ? 6�$��a pCYfVYTYNUMBER � 8-2f ��^� sti^�0 . FINANCIAL INFOqMAT10N: (EXPUiIN) B a , AS� S 32S�OOO C, Gts 98 = 5a �___.._....�.w.,�.�_......_. .. __: , SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENBATTONS Ward 3 ��.�'��r � PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALIi B.S. GOODRICH AVE. from S. Hamline Ave. to S. Syndicate St. s�' IlNITIATIlNG ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIpNS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, disintegrated and settled panels. ................................................................................ PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALH B. S. S. HAMLINE AVE. from James Ave. to Randolph Ave. 5 � n2 INITIATING ACTIQN; This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public � w' necessity on the basis of three (3) complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with asphalt patches, scaled, settled and cracked panels. ................................................................................ PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWAI.K E.S. S. HAMLIATE AVE. from Watson Ave. to Bayard Ave. & W.S. S. HAMLINE AVE. from Hartford Ave. to Bayard Ave. � �{ y9� INIT7ATING ACTION: This order was uutiated by the Director of Public Works as public E W� necessity on the basis of one (1� complaint and an inspection of the walk. � �� ^ I � i� EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, scaled and settled panels. PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. JAMES AVE. from S. Albert St. to S. Hamline Ave. INITIATIIITG ACTION: This order was uutiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of two (2) complaints and an inspection of the wALk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, scaled, settled and cracked panels. PRO.IECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. LINCOLN AVE. from S. Syndicate St. to Approximately 360' E. of S. Syndciate St. IIvITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint, a petition with one (1) signer and an inspection of the walk. ERISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, settled and cracked panels. PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. MACALEST'ER ST, from Palace Ave, to Juliet Ave. `��' -S��... c 9 � - � 27 CITY OF ST. PAUL COU I I O. y,3 �_ PREL2MINARY ORDER By Fi e No. S D51 thru 598064 Voting Ward 3 In the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction at the following locations: S98051 - Both sides Goodrich Avenue from S Hamline Ave to S Syndicate St 598052 - Both sides S Hamline Avenue £rom James Ave to Randolgh Ave S98053 - East side S Hamline Ave from Watson Ave to Bayard Ave and West side S Ham.line Ave from Hartford Ave to Bayard Ave. S98054 - Both sides James Ave from S�Albert to S Hamline 598055 - Both sides Lincoln Ave £rom S Syndicate St to approximately 360 ft East of S Syndicate St. 598056 - Both sides Macalester 5t Prom Palace Ave to Juliet Ave 598057 - Both si@es Osceola Ave from S Snelling Ave to S Saratoga St and West side S Saratoga St from Fairmount Ave to Osceola Ave 598058 - Soth sides S Pascal St from Palace Ave to Randolph Ave 598059 - Both sides St Clair Ave £rom S Albert St to S Pascal St 598060 - North side St Clair Ave from S Saratoga St to S Pascal St and South side St Clair Ave £rom Warwick St to S Pascal St S98061 - Soth sides S Saratoga St from Lincoln Ave to Goodrich Ave 598062 - Both sides Sargent Ave from S Albert St to S Hamline Ave S98063 - South side Scheffer Ave from S Hamline Ave to West 105 ft at 657 S Hamline Ave only 598064 - Both sides Stanford Ave from S Albert St to 5 Pascal St. ��y3z �,�- *ESTIMA2ED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) - 57.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and 59.18 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. A11 other widths will be prorated accordingly. 2dew construction (where no walk existed) - 100$ of the actual cost estimated to be approximately S3.A2 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), N6N-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.62 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report o£ the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1 � 3 That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereo£ is *SEE ABOVE £or estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1998 Puhlic Improvement Aid. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 24th d�v of .i„ne 399A at 5:30 o'clock P.M.. in the Council Chambers of the City Aall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCTLPERSONS Yeas Nays ✓Benanav �/Blakey �ostrom �oleman �arris �antry ✓iieiter �In Favor �Against Adopted by Council: Date_�� Certified Passed by Council cretary Bp � a - Y`_'��-`� — Mayor CITY OF ST . PAUL '\� rC�� - � �a� � qY C L£ LE O �g - s R a. �� FINAL ORDER By File No. S SO 1 thru 598064 Voting Ward 3 In the Matter o£ sidemalk reconstruction at the folloming locations: S98051 - Both sides Goodrich Avenue Prom S Hamline Ave to S Syndicate St S98052 - Both sides S Hamline Avenue from James Ave to Randolph Ave 598053 - East side S Hamlilne Ave from Watson Ave to Bayard Ave and West side S Aamline Ave from Hartford Ave to Bayard Ave S98054 - Both sides James Ave from S Albert to S Hamline 598055 - Both sides Lincoln Ave from S Syndicate St to approximately 360 ft� East of S Syndicate St Lci��i over �-o J.,, l G:-!y C>uN�:� YM1i�y. 598056 - Both sides Macalester St from Palace to Juliet ° �� 598057 - Both sides Osceola Ave from S Snelling Ave to S Saratoga St an��"`�"� o�=r � West side S Saratoga St from Fairmount Ave to Osceola Ave �" � C ` - ��\ �=cy� i +� Nc� . U 598058 - Both sides S Pascal St from Palace Ave to Randolph Ave S98059 - Both sides St Clair from S Albert St to Pascal St L4,i� Ov�r� 598060 - North side St Clair Ave from S Saratoga St to S Pascal St and '�j�, G� South side St Clair Ave from Warwick St to S Pascal St �� `� 598061 - Both sides S Saratoga St from Lincoln Ave to Goodrich Ave �� S98062 - Both sides Sargent Ave from S Albert St to S Hamline Ave 598063 - South side Scheffer Ave from S Hamlline Ave to West 105 ft at 657 S Hamline Ave only 598064 - Both sides Stanford Ave from S Albert St to S Pascal St. �8 -s�2- *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) - 57.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $9.18 per front foot £or a six (6) £oot wide wa1k. A11 other widths wi11 be prorated accordingly, New construction (where no walk existed) - 1000 of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.42 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (MOre than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.62 per square foot. under Preliminary order `p - �'3� approved �� q,� The Council of the City of Saint Pau1 has conducted a pu ic hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City of£icers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPER50NS Yeas Nays Benanav-�- (1� �lakey �strom ✓C.oleman �rris �/Lantry �iter Adopted by Council Certified Passed by Date�\\„_,_, �y�� Coun `��Secretary (o In Favor By �Against Mayor 1 ��osey�,� Public Hearing Date — June 24, 1998 RE 5-8-9& e DEPAR7MENT10FFICFJCOUNCIL DATEIMITIATED GREEN SHEET NO. `yoJ� Public Works Sidewalks 4'3'98 INITIAWATE INITIAVDATE CANTACTPERSON8PHONE �DEPAFiTMENTDIflECTOfl �qTYCOUNCIL � Larry H. Lueth - 266-6083 �GN �CIiY ATTOftNEY �CINCLERK NU4HER FOp MUST9EONCOUNCILAGENDABV�OA'1E) S-ZO-9H RQ�� gUDCETDIRECTOR �FIN.&MGLSERVICESOIp. For Public Hearing on 6-24-98 �MAYoR(08ASSlSTANi� 0 Cour�ci4 Research TOTqL f OF SIGNAS{1PE PAGES 1 _(CIIP ALL LOCAiIONS Wit SIGNf�TURE) � ASSOCIA7E A� EFC�ALACCOUNTAM MTqN REWESTED Reconstruct Sidewalk in Ward 3(See attached list) REWMMENDATIONS: Gypiare (A) a Rejact (R) pER50NAt SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWEfl THE FOLLOWING DI.lEST10NS: _PLaNWNGCOMMISSIINJ _CNILSERVICECOMMISSION �� m15�S� NO�WOrk2dunderacoMrectiorUlisdepazttn¢rtt? cIB COMMfiTEE 2� Has ihis persoNfimf ever been a City employee? — — YES NO j? S7qFF 3. Does Uiis person/firm possess a skill not rrormafy possessed by any current ciry emp{oyee? �ISTRICTCOUNGI YES NO SUPPOHiS WH�cH CoUNCiL OelECTNE? �P��^ 8�� Yes answers on separate sheet and atfach to green shaet INRIATING PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPORNNITV (WHO. WFiAT. WHEN. WHERE, WHY): The problem "defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, de�eterious subgrade material, aRernating freeRhaw cycles, service frfe limits, cfiemicaV addftives, e�reme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a ciiywide level and must be addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condftion would worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusable and subjec[ to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations. ADVANTAGESIFAPPROVED: The cummunfty will benefit from this project because it will provide safe detect free sidewalks for Rs many citizens. The sidewalk contracts are executed by private contractors, so it foflows that private sector jobs are created as a resuk of this activity. DISADVAN7AGES IF APPROVED: Historically, the sidewafk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment. Slmply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half the assessment is Gity subsidized, it still remains coniroversial. OISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPAOVED: This opSion would allow the infrasiructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, wi(I generate more personal injury suits, uRimately resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in eventuai-repairs•ar�d/ar-replacament as ciaim payouts. Counr�9 Research Cer�ter MAY 111998 TOTALAMWNTOFTRANSACTION$ 7] jO7 8H COST/REVENUEBUDGETED(CIBCLEOHE) YES NO WNDMGSOUFCE �$°M^466$ A PtA 98 ? 6�$��a pCYfVYTYNUMBER � 8-2f ��^� sti^�0 . FINANCIAL INFOqMAT10N: (EXPUiIN) B a , AS� S 32S�OOO C, Gts 98 = 5a �___.._....�.w.,�.�_......_. .. __: , SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENBATTONS Ward 3 ��.�'��r � PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALIi B.S. GOODRICH AVE. from S. Hamline Ave. to S. Syndicate St. s�' IlNITIATIlNG ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIpNS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, disintegrated and settled panels. ................................................................................ PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALH B. S. S. HAMLINE AVE. from James Ave. to Randolph Ave. 5 � n2 INITIATING ACTIQN; This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public � w' necessity on the basis of three (3) complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with asphalt patches, scaled, settled and cracked panels. ................................................................................ PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWAI.K E.S. S. HAMLIATE AVE. from Watson Ave. to Bayard Ave. & W.S. S. HAMLINE AVE. from Hartford Ave. to Bayard Ave. � �{ y9� INIT7ATING ACTION: This order was uutiated by the Director of Public Works as public E W� necessity on the basis of one (1� complaint and an inspection of the walk. � �� ^ I � i� EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, scaled and settled panels. PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. JAMES AVE. from S. Albert St. to S. Hamline Ave. INITIATIIITG ACTION: This order was uutiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of two (2) complaints and an inspection of the wALk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, scaled, settled and cracked panels. PRO.IECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. LINCOLN AVE. from S. Syndicate St. to Approximately 360' E. of S. Syndciate St. IIvITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint, a petition with one (1) signer and an inspection of the walk. ERISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, settled and cracked panels. PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. MACALEST'ER ST, from Palace Ave, to Juliet Ave. `��' -S��... c 9 � - � 27 CITY OF ST. PAUL COU I I O. y,3 �_ PREL2MINARY ORDER By Fi e No. S D51 thru 598064 Voting Ward 3 In the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction at the following locations: S98051 - Both sides Goodrich Avenue from S Hamline Ave to S Syndicate St 598052 - Both sides S Hamline Avenue £rom James Ave to Randolgh Ave S98053 - East side S Hamline Ave from Watson Ave to Bayard Ave and West side S Ham.line Ave from Hartford Ave to Bayard Ave. S98054 - Both sides James Ave from S�Albert to S Hamline 598055 - Both sides Lincoln Ave £rom S Syndicate St to approximately 360 ft East of S Syndicate St. 598056 - Both sides Macalester 5t Prom Palace Ave to Juliet Ave 598057 - Both si@es Osceola Ave from S Snelling Ave to S Saratoga St and West side S Saratoga St from Fairmount Ave to Osceola Ave 598058 - Soth sides S Pascal St from Palace Ave to Randolph Ave 598059 - Both sides St Clair Ave £rom S Albert St to S Pascal St 598060 - North side St Clair Ave from S Saratoga St to S Pascal St and South side St Clair Ave £rom Warwick St to S Pascal St S98061 - Soth sides S Saratoga St from Lincoln Ave to Goodrich Ave 598062 - Both sides Sargent Ave from S Albert St to S Hamline Ave S98063 - South side Scheffer Ave from S Hamline Ave to West 105 ft at 657 S Hamline Ave only 598064 - Both sides Stanford Ave from S Albert St to 5 Pascal St. ��y3z �,�- *ESTIMA2ED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) - 57.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and 59.18 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. A11 other widths will be prorated accordingly. 2dew construction (where no walk existed) - 100$ of the actual cost estimated to be approximately S3.A2 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), N6N-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.62 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report o£ the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1 � 3 That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereo£ is *SEE ABOVE £or estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1998 Puhlic Improvement Aid. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 24th d�v of .i„ne 399A at 5:30 o'clock P.M.. in the Council Chambers of the City Aall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCTLPERSONS Yeas Nays ✓Benanav �/Blakey �ostrom �oleman �arris �antry ✓iieiter �In Favor �Against Adopted by Council: Date_�� Certified Passed by Council cretary Bp � a - Y`_'��-`� — Mayor