98-571CITY OF ST. PAUY
FINAL ORDER
COUNCIL FI � � r � �
By
File No. S9 50
Voting Ward 2
In the Matter o£ sidewalk reconstruction at the following locations:
598050 - Both sides E Robie St Prom Bancroft Avenue to approximately
240 feet east of Bancroft Ave.
*ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES
6�
RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures)
Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk� -$7.65 per front foot for a five (5)
foot wide walk and $9.18 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide
walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction
(where no walk existed) - 100% of the actual cost estimated to be
approximately $3.42 per square foot.
All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150
feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of
the property.
MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES
For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100°s of actual cost estimated to be
approximately $4.62 per square £oot.
under Preliminary order � g' —�� � approved �
The Council of the City o£ Saint Paul has conducted a pu lic hearing upon the
above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City
Charter; and
WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations
pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now,
therefore, be it
RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the
above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed
and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it
FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City
officers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to
the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter.
COUNCILPERSONS
Yeas Nays
Benanav— (>bs�,�,�
✓Blakey
✓�ostrom
;� eman
�I
�ntry
�iter
� In Favor
� Against
e �bs�r..�
Adopted by Council: Date a. ��q�
Certified Passed by Council Secretary
BY �
Mayor
�ublic Hearin� Date - June 24, 1998 RE 5-8-98 F�/�-�- �'/
DEPARTMENT/OFFICFICOUNCIL DATEINlTIATED GREENSHEET O � ' NO.� o �
Public Works Sidewalks 43-98 iNmnupare ATE
CONTACTPERSON&PHONE DEPARTMENTDIRECTOR �CfiYCOUNqL
LarryH.Lueth-266-6083 �cN cmrarroaNer �CfTYCLERK
NUMBFR FOR
MUSTHEON�UNCILAGENDABY(DA� 5-20-98 p�� BUDGETDIRECTOR �FIN.BMGT,SEFiVICESDIF.
For Public Hearing on 6-24-98 �MAYOF(ORASSISTMIT) 7�COUncil Rrearch
TOTAL,}OF&GNANREPAGES I. _ (C4PALLLOCAilONSFORSIGNATURE) �ASSOCIATE ALACCOUNfANT
ACTIOIi qE�UESSED �-�
Reconstruct Sidewalk in Ward 6(See attached listj
�
RECOMMENOATIONS; �WP« W a Rel� (R! PERSONAL SERVICE CONTR4CT5 MUST ANSWER7HE FOLLOWING W1EST10NS:
PLANNING COMMISSION CNIL SEAVIGE COMMl55lON 1. Flas Uiisper�o�IFim ever worked u�det a conttact for thi5 department?
— — EY S NO
_as CoMMI7rEE _ 2 Has Uiis gE5 �� NO er been a ciry employee?
A S7aFF 3. Dces rtiis persoNfirtn possess a skill not normally possessed by arry wrrent ciry
— — employee?
DiSTRICT WUNCIL YES NO
SUPPoRTS WHICH COUNCIL O&IECTNE? �P�ai1 al! yes answefs on 50parate sheet alld attach to green sheet
W A.C�t.Or.. oS,
INITIATING PFiOBLEM, ISSUE, OPPORTUNIN (WHO, WHAT, WHEN. WHERE. WFN):
The problem "defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, afternating freeRhaw cycles,
serv+ce I'rfe limilfi, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide levef and must 6e
addressed and corrected on an annuaf basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition wauld worsen to a state where it would be
rendered unusable and subjec[ to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations.
A�VANTAGESIFAPPPOVED:
The community will benefit from this project because it will provide safe detect free sidewalks fpr its many citizens. The sidewalk
contracls are executed by private contractors, so it follows that private sector jobs are created as a resuft of this activity.
DISADVANiAGES IF APPROVED:
Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment.
Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it still
remains coniroversial.
DISAOVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED:
This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal injury suits,
uRimately resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in eventual repairs and/orr 5lacefi�rif;'as w�ll 'as diaim payoufs.
COUnc� ResQ�tC11 Gent¢�
�AY 1119�
TOTAIAMOUM'OFTRANSACTION$ � ZO , COS7/qEVENUEBUDGETED(CiRCLEONE) YES� NO
FUNDINGSOURCE �$'�'}"�O��S Ay� FFA g$ = C)�HrQQO, ACINRYNUMBER C9H^ HEF-�OOOOO
FINANCIALINFORMATION:(EXPLAIN) B� F�ST � 325�OQ0 �
� � f h� 98 = � � �00 .��._____.�a.v.....r..__,._......_ .. . .......... .
SUMMAI2Y OF ENGINEERING KEC(�MMENDATION
Wazd 2
w�It�G
• -
PROJECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALg B.S. E. ROBIE ST. from Bancroft
Ave. to Approximately 240' E. of Bancroft Ave.
5�3D INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works
as public necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint, a petition with one (1)
signer and an inspection of the walk.
EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves,
asphalt patches, settled and craeked panels.
...................................................................
CITY OF ST. PAUL
ORDER
In the Matter of sidemalk reconstruction at
�`(i]I
By
File No. S98 0
Votinq Ward 2
the following locations:
S98Q50 - Both sides E Robie St fram Bancroft Avenue to approximately
240 feet east of Bancroft Ave.
*ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RA ES
� Z�
RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures)
Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.65 per £ront foot for a
five (5) £oot wide walk and $9.18 per front £oot for a six (6) £oot wide
walk. All other widths wi11 be prorated accordingly. New construction
(where no walk existed) - lOD� of the actual cost estimated to be
approximately $3.42 per square £oot.
All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150
feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of
the property.
MULTI-RESI➢ENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES
For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be
approximately $4.62 per square £oot.
The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon
tne above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves:
1
2
3.
That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives,
and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction
rates, £inanced by assessments and 1998 Public Improvement Aid.
That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 24th dav of June. 1998
at 5:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House
Building in the City of Saint Pau1.
That natice o£ said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner
provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of
the improvement and the total cost thereo£ as estimated.
COUNCILPERSOI3S
Yeas / Nays
✓Benanav
✓Blakey
r/fiostrom
�leman
�larris
i/Lantry
�eiter
�In Favor
�Against
Adopted by Council: Date aZ, 1`���
Certified Passed by Council Secretary
BY �, a '� ,.-.,
r
CITY OF ST. PAUY
FINAL ORDER
COUNCIL FI � � r � �
By
File No. S9 50
Voting Ward 2
In the Matter o£ sidewalk reconstruction at the following locations:
598050 - Both sides E Robie St Prom Bancroft Avenue to approximately
240 feet east of Bancroft Ave.
*ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES
6�
RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures)
Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk� -$7.65 per front foot for a five (5)
foot wide walk and $9.18 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide
walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction
(where no walk existed) - 100% of the actual cost estimated to be
approximately $3.42 per square foot.
All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150
feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of
the property.
MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES
For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100°s of actual cost estimated to be
approximately $4.62 per square £oot.
under Preliminary order � g' —�� � approved �
The Council of the City o£ Saint Paul has conducted a pu lic hearing upon the
above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City
Charter; and
WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations
pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now,
therefore, be it
RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the
above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed
and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it
FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City
officers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to
the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter.
COUNCILPERSONS
Yeas Nays
Benanav— (>bs�,�,�
✓Blakey
✓�ostrom
;� eman
�I
�ntry
�iter
� In Favor
� Against
e �bs�r..�
Adopted by Council: Date a. ��q�
Certified Passed by Council Secretary
BY �
Mayor
�ublic Hearin� Date - June 24, 1998 RE 5-8-98 F�/�-�- �'/
DEPARTMENT/OFFICFICOUNCIL DATEINlTIATED GREENSHEET O � ' NO.� o �
Public Works Sidewalks 43-98 iNmnupare ATE
CONTACTPERSON&PHONE DEPARTMENTDIRECTOR �CfiYCOUNqL
LarryH.Lueth-266-6083 �cN cmrarroaNer �CfTYCLERK
NUMBFR FOR
MUSTHEON�UNCILAGENDABY(DA� 5-20-98 p�� BUDGETDIRECTOR �FIN.BMGT,SEFiVICESDIF.
For Public Hearing on 6-24-98 �MAYOF(ORASSISTMIT) 7�COUncil Rrearch
TOTAL,}OF&GNANREPAGES I. _ (C4PALLLOCAilONSFORSIGNATURE) �ASSOCIATE ALACCOUNfANT
ACTIOIi qE�UESSED �-�
Reconstruct Sidewalk in Ward 6(See attached listj
�
RECOMMENOATIONS; �WP« W a Rel� (R! PERSONAL SERVICE CONTR4CT5 MUST ANSWER7HE FOLLOWING W1EST10NS:
PLANNING COMMISSION CNIL SEAVIGE COMMl55lON 1. Flas Uiisper�o�IFim ever worked u�det a conttact for thi5 department?
— — EY S NO
_as CoMMI7rEE _ 2 Has Uiis gE5 �� NO er been a ciry employee?
A S7aFF 3. Dces rtiis persoNfirtn possess a skill not normally possessed by arry wrrent ciry
— — employee?
DiSTRICT WUNCIL YES NO
SUPPoRTS WHICH COUNCIL O&IECTNE? �P�ai1 al! yes answefs on 50parate sheet alld attach to green sheet
W A.C�t.Or.. oS,
INITIATING PFiOBLEM, ISSUE, OPPORTUNIN (WHO, WHAT, WHEN. WHERE. WFN):
The problem "defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, afternating freeRhaw cycles,
serv+ce I'rfe limilfi, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide levef and must 6e
addressed and corrected on an annuaf basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition wauld worsen to a state where it would be
rendered unusable and subjec[ to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations.
A�VANTAGESIFAPPPOVED:
The community will benefit from this project because it will provide safe detect free sidewalks fpr its many citizens. The sidewalk
contracls are executed by private contractors, so it follows that private sector jobs are created as a resuft of this activity.
DISADVANiAGES IF APPROVED:
Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment.
Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it still
remains coniroversial.
DISAOVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED:
This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal injury suits,
uRimately resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in eventual repairs and/orr 5lacefi�rif;'as w�ll 'as diaim payoufs.
COUnc� ResQ�tC11 Gent¢�
�AY 1119�
TOTAIAMOUM'OFTRANSACTION$ � ZO , COS7/qEVENUEBUDGETED(CiRCLEONE) YES� NO
FUNDINGSOURCE �$'�'}"�O��S Ay� FFA g$ = C)�HrQQO, ACINRYNUMBER C9H^ HEF-�OOOOO
FINANCIALINFORMATION:(EXPLAIN) B� F�ST � 325�OQ0 �
� � f h� 98 = � � �00 .��._____.�a.v.....r..__,._......_ .. . .......... .
SUMMAI2Y OF ENGINEERING KEC(�MMENDATION
Wazd 2
w�It�G
• -
PROJECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALg B.S. E. ROBIE ST. from Bancroft
Ave. to Approximately 240' E. of Bancroft Ave.
5�3D INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works
as public necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint, a petition with one (1)
signer and an inspection of the walk.
EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves,
asphalt patches, settled and craeked panels.
...................................................................
CITY OF ST. PAUL
ORDER
In the Matter of sidemalk reconstruction at
�`(i]I
By
File No. S98 0
Votinq Ward 2
the following locations:
S98Q50 - Both sides E Robie St fram Bancroft Avenue to approximately
240 feet east of Bancroft Ave.
*ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RA ES
� Z�
RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures)
Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.65 per £ront foot for a
five (5) £oot wide walk and $9.18 per front £oot for a six (6) £oot wide
walk. All other widths wi11 be prorated accordingly. New construction
(where no walk existed) - lOD� of the actual cost estimated to be
approximately $3.42 per square £oot.
All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150
feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of
the property.
MULTI-RESI➢ENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES
For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be
approximately $4.62 per square £oot.
The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon
tne above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves:
1
2
3.
That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives,
and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction
rates, £inanced by assessments and 1998 Public Improvement Aid.
That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 24th dav of June. 1998
at 5:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House
Building in the City of Saint Pau1.
That natice o£ said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner
provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of
the improvement and the total cost thereo£ as estimated.
COUNCILPERSOI3S
Yeas / Nays
✓Benanav
✓Blakey
r/fiostrom
�leman
�larris
i/Lantry
�eiter
�In Favor
�Against
Adopted by Council: Date aZ, 1`���
Certified Passed by Council Secretary
BY �, a '� ,.-.,
r
CITY OF ST. PAUY
FINAL ORDER
COUNCIL FI � � r � �
By
File No. S9 50
Voting Ward 2
In the Matter o£ sidewalk reconstruction at the following locations:
598050 - Both sides E Robie St Prom Bancroft Avenue to approximately
240 feet east of Bancroft Ave.
*ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES
6�
RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures)
Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk� -$7.65 per front foot for a five (5)
foot wide walk and $9.18 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide
walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction
(where no walk existed) - 100% of the actual cost estimated to be
approximately $3.42 per square foot.
All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150
feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of
the property.
MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES
For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100°s of actual cost estimated to be
approximately $4.62 per square £oot.
under Preliminary order � g' —�� � approved �
The Council of the City o£ Saint Paul has conducted a pu lic hearing upon the
above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City
Charter; and
WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations
pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now,
therefore, be it
RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the
above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed
and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it
FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City
officers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to
the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter.
COUNCILPERSONS
Yeas Nays
Benanav— (>bs�,�,�
✓Blakey
✓�ostrom
;� eman
�I
�ntry
�iter
� In Favor
� Against
e �bs�r..�
Adopted by Council: Date a. ��q�
Certified Passed by Council Secretary
BY �
Mayor
�ublic Hearin� Date - June 24, 1998 RE 5-8-98 F�/�-�- �'/
DEPARTMENT/OFFICFICOUNCIL DATEINlTIATED GREENSHEET O � ' NO.� o �
Public Works Sidewalks 43-98 iNmnupare ATE
CONTACTPERSON&PHONE DEPARTMENTDIRECTOR �CfiYCOUNqL
LarryH.Lueth-266-6083 �cN cmrarroaNer �CfTYCLERK
NUMBFR FOR
MUSTHEON�UNCILAGENDABY(DA� 5-20-98 p�� BUDGETDIRECTOR �FIN.BMGT,SEFiVICESDIF.
For Public Hearing on 6-24-98 �MAYOF(ORASSISTMIT) 7�COUncil Rrearch
TOTAL,}OF&GNANREPAGES I. _ (C4PALLLOCAilONSFORSIGNATURE) �ASSOCIATE ALACCOUNfANT
ACTIOIi qE�UESSED �-�
Reconstruct Sidewalk in Ward 6(See attached listj
�
RECOMMENOATIONS; �WP« W a Rel� (R! PERSONAL SERVICE CONTR4CT5 MUST ANSWER7HE FOLLOWING W1EST10NS:
PLANNING COMMISSION CNIL SEAVIGE COMMl55lON 1. Flas Uiisper�o�IFim ever worked u�det a conttact for thi5 department?
— — EY S NO
_as CoMMI7rEE _ 2 Has Uiis gE5 �� NO er been a ciry employee?
A S7aFF 3. Dces rtiis persoNfirtn possess a skill not normally possessed by arry wrrent ciry
— — employee?
DiSTRICT WUNCIL YES NO
SUPPoRTS WHICH COUNCIL O&IECTNE? �P�ai1 al! yes answefs on 50parate sheet alld attach to green sheet
W A.C�t.Or.. oS,
INITIATING PFiOBLEM, ISSUE, OPPORTUNIN (WHO, WHAT, WHEN. WHERE. WFN):
The problem "defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, afternating freeRhaw cycles,
serv+ce I'rfe limilfi, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide levef and must 6e
addressed and corrected on an annuaf basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition wauld worsen to a state where it would be
rendered unusable and subjec[ to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations.
A�VANTAGESIFAPPPOVED:
The community will benefit from this project because it will provide safe detect free sidewalks fpr its many citizens. The sidewalk
contracls are executed by private contractors, so it follows that private sector jobs are created as a resuft of this activity.
DISADVANiAGES IF APPROVED:
Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment.
Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it still
remains coniroversial.
DISAOVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED:
This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal injury suits,
uRimately resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in eventual repairs and/orr 5lacefi�rif;'as w�ll 'as diaim payoufs.
COUnc� ResQ�tC11 Gent¢�
�AY 1119�
TOTAIAMOUM'OFTRANSACTION$ � ZO , COS7/qEVENUEBUDGETED(CiRCLEONE) YES� NO
FUNDINGSOURCE �$'�'}"�O��S Ay� FFA g$ = C)�HrQQO, ACINRYNUMBER C9H^ HEF-�OOOOO
FINANCIALINFORMATION:(EXPLAIN) B� F�ST � 325�OQ0 �
� � f h� 98 = � � �00 .��._____.�a.v.....r..__,._......_ .. . .......... .
SUMMAI2Y OF ENGINEERING KEC(�MMENDATION
Wazd 2
w�It�G
• -
PROJECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALg B.S. E. ROBIE ST. from Bancroft
Ave. to Approximately 240' E. of Bancroft Ave.
5�3D INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works
as public necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint, a petition with one (1)
signer and an inspection of the walk.
EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves,
asphalt patches, settled and craeked panels.
...................................................................
CITY OF ST. PAUL
ORDER
In the Matter of sidemalk reconstruction at
�`(i]I
By
File No. S98 0
Votinq Ward 2
the following locations:
S98Q50 - Both sides E Robie St fram Bancroft Avenue to approximately
240 feet east of Bancroft Ave.
*ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RA ES
� Z�
RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures)
Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.65 per £ront foot for a
five (5) £oot wide walk and $9.18 per front £oot for a six (6) £oot wide
walk. All other widths wi11 be prorated accordingly. New construction
(where no walk existed) - lOD� of the actual cost estimated to be
approximately $3.42 per square £oot.
All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150
feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of
the property.
MULTI-RESI➢ENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES
For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be
approximately $4.62 per square £oot.
The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon
tne above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves:
1
2
3.
That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives,
and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction
rates, £inanced by assessments and 1998 Public Improvement Aid.
That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 24th dav of June. 1998
at 5:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House
Building in the City of Saint Pau1.
That natice o£ said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner
provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of
the improvement and the total cost thereo£ as estimated.
COUNCILPERSOI3S
Yeas / Nays
✓Benanav
✓Blakey
r/fiostrom
�leman
�larris
i/Lantry
�eiter
�In Favor
�Against
Adopted by Council: Date aZ, 1`���
Certified Passed by Council Secretary
BY �, a '� ,.-.,
r