Loading...
98-569CZTY OF ST. PAUL COUNCIL FILE �O. �8_5_�� � S FINAL ORDER BY �,/�, V � File No.Z 59803 thru 598Q36 Voting Ward 1, 4, & 7 In the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction at the £olloming locations: S98034 - Both sides Dayton Avenue from N Syndicate St to N Griggs St 598035 - West side N Hamline Avenue from W Nebraska Ave to W Hoyt Ave 598036 - Both sides Cypress Street from Wilson Ave to Wake£ield Ave. *ESTIMATED CQNSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.65 per front foot £or a Pive (5) foot wide walk and $9.18 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. A11 other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.42 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.62 per square foot. under Preliminary order lc,� —��q approved � V� ��_� �� The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers sha11 calculate a11 expenses incurred therein and sha11 report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays Benanav — (�,�Se�� ✓�lakey �strom �leman ✓Frarris �ntry �ter Adopted by Council: Date l�� Certified Passed by Counci Secretary � Sn Favor Sy � Q Against Mayor � �bsex�� Works Sidewalks H. Lueth - �-8-98 GREEN SHEET ' 9 o 8 c — ' z� ^ �q INITIAUpATE__ NO.�LOD/H _ _ _"••,•••�� w�GN�A BY ATE �+a�Gn �� � `�� � � 5-20-98 e"ounrcFOR �CmAnORNEy For Public Hearing on 6-24_gg °im �+ ❑��ETDIREC70R —� fAL At OF yGlIqTURE PAGES � MAYOR (OR ASSISTAN = �� �WES7ED 1 —� (CI1P ALL LOCATION$ FpR gGNqTUqEj Reconstruct Sidewalk in Wards t, 4& 7(See attached lists) ❑"SSOCw� - �-*+ , ..m , i�v o, . .C16 COMMITTEE STAFF DISTRIC7 COUNCIL � cm couNCii � � Clry CLEqK FIN. g MG7, SEqVICES Council p ... . CNIL SERVICE COMM PERSONAL SEpVICE COt�ITqq�S MUST ANS — �s�ON �. Has rhis peES Nfirm ever wprked under a contrac f m s�tl � Y NO �NG QUESTIONS: —'--��� 2. Has this YES n�� ever been a city emplo �,? P�nent. --� --��--. 3 � Dces mis person/firt�n�possess a skill not normally p�sessed b employee. rEZ �� YES Np Y arry current ciry Fxpiain all yes answers on separate sheet arid attach to grae� sheet . . . ._.....�,. rvnerv, WHERE. he problem "defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, ahernating freefthaw service I'rfe limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a cit addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condflion would worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations. �Q�es, ywide level and must be The community Wip benefit trom this project because it will provide safe detect free sidewalks for its many citizens. The sidewalk contracts are executed by p�ivate contractors, so it follows ihat private sector jobs are created as a resuk of this activity. Simply stated, pr perty owners d test as essmeMSt nd despite the fa t to one-half the assess . remains controversial. construction procedure and assessment. ment is City subsidized, it still This option would allow the infrastructure ot sidewalk stock to deteriorate, wRich7n tptn; �qr��f g�n2rate rnpre uRimately resuliing in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in eventual repairs and/or replacement, as well as claim payouts. personal injury suits, � Rasearch Ge�#er ��TpL'qq1WNT OF iRAN3p�7�pN $ U NDINCaSWRCE 9S±�f�,� INANCIAL INFORMATION: (EXPL - n� na � ' 32$. e_e►•a 9a �; so; MAY 111998 COST/REVENUE BUDGETED (CIRCLE ONE) ACITVITYNUMBER C98�2T�5��( NO SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATION Ward 1 pA�-��"i'• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALg B.S. DAYTON AVE. from iV. Syndicate St. to N. Griggs St. 5� �t� - s �q �� INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of two (2) complaints, a petition with one (1} signer and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CO1�iDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, disintegrated, scaled, settled and cracked panels. ................................................................... SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOIvIMENDATION Ward 4 PROJECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK W.S. N. HAMI.INE AVE. from W. Nebraska Ave. to W. Hoyt Ave. i ��_.�__. . _ 5 �?� INIT3'ATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of two (2) complaints and an inspection of the wa1k. EXISTING CONDITIOI�I5: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, scaled and cracked panels. ................................................................... SUMMAI2Y OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATI N Ward 7 � w•iF� _ . i PROJECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. CYPRESS ST. from Wilson Ave. to Wakefield Ave. 5 y�p,� INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of one (1} complaint, a petition with one (1) signer and an inspection of the walk. E%ISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with scaled and cracked panels. ................................................................... �lS -S�9 CITY OF ST. PAUL COUNCI FILE N0. — 7 Z�I �� PRELZMINARY ORDER By File No. S9803 thru 598036 Voting Ward_1,4,& 7 In the Matter of sidemalk reconstruction at the £ollowing locations: 598034 - Both sides Dayton Avenue from N Syndicate St to N Griggs St S98035 - West side N Hamline Avenue from W Nebraska Ave to W Hoyt Ave S98036 - Both sides Cypress Street from Wilson Ave to Wakefield Ave. *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIBENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structuresj Reconstruction (replacement o£ old sidewalk) - 57.65 per front foot £or a five (5) foot wide walk and 59.18 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. A11 other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100; of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.42 per square foot. A11 corner residential properties will.receive a credit up to the Pirst 150 feet o£ new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MU TI-RES D TIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately 54.62 per square Poot. The Council of the City oP Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1998 Public Improvement Aid. 2. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 24th dav of June. 1998 at 5:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Buildinq in the City of Saint Paul. 3. That notice o£ said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner p'rovided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the neture of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSOI3S Yeas Nays ✓enanav ✓Blakey �ostrom �oleman ✓I-�rris riLantry �iter L In Favor a Against Adopted by Council: Date c,���$" Certified Passed by Council Se�retary BY��a._ a l� � ..��... Mayor CZTY OF ST. PAUL COUNCIL FILE �O. �8_5_�� � S FINAL ORDER BY �,/�, V � File No.Z 59803 thru 598Q36 Voting Ward 1, 4, & 7 In the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction at the £olloming locations: S98034 - Both sides Dayton Avenue from N Syndicate St to N Griggs St 598035 - West side N Hamline Avenue from W Nebraska Ave to W Hoyt Ave 598036 - Both sides Cypress Street from Wilson Ave to Wake£ield Ave. *ESTIMATED CQNSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.65 per front foot £or a Pive (5) foot wide walk and $9.18 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. A11 other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.42 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.62 per square foot. under Preliminary order lc,� —��q approved � V� ��_� �� The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers sha11 calculate a11 expenses incurred therein and sha11 report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays Benanav — (�,�Se�� ✓�lakey �strom �leman ✓Frarris �ntry �ter Adopted by Council: Date l�� Certified Passed by Counci Secretary � Sn Favor Sy � Q Against Mayor � �bsex�� Works Sidewalks H. Lueth - �-8-98 GREEN SHEET ' 9 o 8 c — ' z� ^ �q INITIAUpATE__ NO.�LOD/H _ _ _"••,•••�� w�GN�A BY ATE �+a�Gn �� � `�� � � 5-20-98 e"ounrcFOR �CmAnORNEy For Public Hearing on 6-24_gg °im �+ ❑��ETDIREC70R —� fAL At OF yGlIqTURE PAGES � MAYOR (OR ASSISTAN = �� �WES7ED 1 —� (CI1P ALL LOCATION$ FpR gGNqTUqEj Reconstruct Sidewalk in Wards t, 4& 7(See attached lists) ❑"SSOCw� - �-*+ , ..m , i�v o, . .C16 COMMITTEE STAFF DISTRIC7 COUNCIL � cm couNCii � � Clry CLEqK FIN. g MG7, SEqVICES Council p ... . CNIL SERVICE COMM PERSONAL SEpVICE COt�ITqq�S MUST ANS — �s�ON �. Has rhis peES Nfirm ever wprked under a contrac f m s�tl � Y NO �NG QUESTIONS: —'--��� 2. Has this YES n�� ever been a city emplo �,? P�nent. --� --��--. 3 � Dces mis person/firt�n�possess a skill not normally p�sessed b employee. rEZ �� YES Np Y arry current ciry Fxpiain all yes answers on separate sheet arid attach to grae� sheet . . . ._.....�,. rvnerv, WHERE. he problem "defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, ahernating freefthaw service I'rfe limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a cit addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condflion would worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations. �Q�es, ywide level and must be The community Wip benefit trom this project because it will provide safe detect free sidewalks for its many citizens. The sidewalk contracts are executed by p�ivate contractors, so it follows ihat private sector jobs are created as a resuk of this activity. Simply stated, pr perty owners d test as essmeMSt nd despite the fa t to one-half the assess . remains controversial. construction procedure and assessment. ment is City subsidized, it still This option would allow the infrastructure ot sidewalk stock to deteriorate, wRich7n tptn; �qr��f g�n2rate rnpre uRimately resuliing in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in eventual repairs and/or replacement, as well as claim payouts. personal injury suits, � Rasearch Ge�#er ��TpL'qq1WNT OF iRAN3p�7�pN $ U NDINCaSWRCE 9S±�f�,� INANCIAL INFORMATION: (EXPL - n� na � ' 32$. e_e►•a 9a �; so; MAY 111998 COST/REVENUE BUDGETED (CIRCLE ONE) ACITVITYNUMBER C98�2T�5��( NO SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATION Ward 1 pA�-��"i'• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALg B.S. DAYTON AVE. from iV. Syndicate St. to N. Griggs St. 5� �t� - s �q �� INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of two (2) complaints, a petition with one (1} signer and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CO1�iDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, disintegrated, scaled, settled and cracked panels. ................................................................... SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOIvIMENDATION Ward 4 PROJECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK W.S. N. HAMI.INE AVE. from W. Nebraska Ave. to W. Hoyt Ave. i ��_.�__. . _ 5 �?� INIT3'ATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of two (2) complaints and an inspection of the wa1k. EXISTING CONDITIOI�I5: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, scaled and cracked panels. ................................................................... SUMMAI2Y OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATI N Ward 7 � w•iF� _ . i PROJECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. CYPRESS ST. from Wilson Ave. to Wakefield Ave. 5 y�p,� INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of one (1} complaint, a petition with one (1) signer and an inspection of the walk. E%ISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with scaled and cracked panels. ................................................................... �lS -S�9 CITY OF ST. PAUL COUNCI FILE N0. — 7 Z�I �� PRELZMINARY ORDER By File No. S9803 thru 598036 Voting Ward_1,4,& 7 In the Matter of sidemalk reconstruction at the £ollowing locations: 598034 - Both sides Dayton Avenue from N Syndicate St to N Griggs St S98035 - West side N Hamline Avenue from W Nebraska Ave to W Hoyt Ave S98036 - Both sides Cypress Street from Wilson Ave to Wakefield Ave. *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIBENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structuresj Reconstruction (replacement o£ old sidewalk) - 57.65 per front foot £or a five (5) foot wide walk and 59.18 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. A11 other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100; of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.42 per square foot. A11 corner residential properties will.receive a credit up to the Pirst 150 feet o£ new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MU TI-RES D TIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately 54.62 per square Poot. The Council of the City oP Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1998 Public Improvement Aid. 2. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 24th dav of June. 1998 at 5:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Buildinq in the City of Saint Paul. 3. That notice o£ said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner p'rovided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the neture of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSOI3S Yeas Nays ✓enanav ✓Blakey �ostrom �oleman ✓I-�rris riLantry �iter L In Favor a Against Adopted by Council: Date c,���$" Certified Passed by Council Se�retary BY��a._ a l� � ..��... Mayor CZTY OF ST. PAUL COUNCIL FILE �O. �8_5_�� � S FINAL ORDER BY �,/�, V � File No.Z 59803 thru 598Q36 Voting Ward 1, 4, & 7 In the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction at the £olloming locations: S98034 - Both sides Dayton Avenue from N Syndicate St to N Griggs St 598035 - West side N Hamline Avenue from W Nebraska Ave to W Hoyt Ave 598036 - Both sides Cypress Street from Wilson Ave to Wake£ield Ave. *ESTIMATED CQNSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.65 per front foot £or a Pive (5) foot wide walk and $9.18 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. A11 other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.42 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.62 per square foot. under Preliminary order lc,� —��q approved � V� ��_� �� The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers sha11 calculate a11 expenses incurred therein and sha11 report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays Benanav — (�,�Se�� ✓�lakey �strom �leman ✓Frarris �ntry �ter Adopted by Council: Date l�� Certified Passed by Counci Secretary � Sn Favor Sy � Q Against Mayor � �bsex�� Works Sidewalks H. Lueth - �-8-98 GREEN SHEET ' 9 o 8 c — ' z� ^ �q INITIAUpATE__ NO.�LOD/H _ _ _"••,•••�� w�GN�A BY ATE �+a�Gn �� � `�� � � 5-20-98 e"ounrcFOR �CmAnORNEy For Public Hearing on 6-24_gg °im �+ ❑��ETDIREC70R —� fAL At OF yGlIqTURE PAGES � MAYOR (OR ASSISTAN = �� �WES7ED 1 —� (CI1P ALL LOCATION$ FpR gGNqTUqEj Reconstruct Sidewalk in Wards t, 4& 7(See attached lists) ❑"SSOCw� - �-*+ , ..m , i�v o, . .C16 COMMITTEE STAFF DISTRIC7 COUNCIL � cm couNCii � � Clry CLEqK FIN. g MG7, SEqVICES Council p ... . CNIL SERVICE COMM PERSONAL SEpVICE COt�ITqq�S MUST ANS — �s�ON �. Has rhis peES Nfirm ever wprked under a contrac f m s�tl � Y NO �NG QUESTIONS: —'--��� 2. Has this YES n�� ever been a city emplo �,? P�nent. --� --��--. 3 � Dces mis person/firt�n�possess a skill not normally p�sessed b employee. rEZ �� YES Np Y arry current ciry Fxpiain all yes answers on separate sheet arid attach to grae� sheet . . . ._.....�,. rvnerv, WHERE. he problem "defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, ahernating freefthaw service I'rfe limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a cit addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condflion would worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations. �Q�es, ywide level and must be The community Wip benefit trom this project because it will provide safe detect free sidewalks for its many citizens. The sidewalk contracts are executed by p�ivate contractors, so it follows ihat private sector jobs are created as a resuk of this activity. Simply stated, pr perty owners d test as essmeMSt nd despite the fa t to one-half the assess . remains controversial. construction procedure and assessment. ment is City subsidized, it still This option would allow the infrastructure ot sidewalk stock to deteriorate, wRich7n tptn; �qr��f g�n2rate rnpre uRimately resuliing in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in eventual repairs and/or replacement, as well as claim payouts. personal injury suits, � Rasearch Ge�#er ��TpL'qq1WNT OF iRAN3p�7�pN $ U NDINCaSWRCE 9S±�f�,� INANCIAL INFORMATION: (EXPL - n� na � ' 32$. e_e►•a 9a �; so; MAY 111998 COST/REVENUE BUDGETED (CIRCLE ONE) ACITVITYNUMBER C98�2T�5��( NO SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATION Ward 1 pA�-��"i'• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALg B.S. DAYTON AVE. from iV. Syndicate St. to N. Griggs St. 5� �t� - s �q �� INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of two (2) complaints, a petition with one (1} signer and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CO1�iDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, disintegrated, scaled, settled and cracked panels. ................................................................... SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOIvIMENDATION Ward 4 PROJECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK W.S. N. HAMI.INE AVE. from W. Nebraska Ave. to W. Hoyt Ave. i ��_.�__. . _ 5 �?� INIT3'ATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of two (2) complaints and an inspection of the wa1k. EXISTING CONDITIOI�I5: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, scaled and cracked panels. ................................................................... SUMMAI2Y OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATI N Ward 7 � w•iF� _ . i PROJECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. CYPRESS ST. from Wilson Ave. to Wakefield Ave. 5 y�p,� INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of one (1} complaint, a petition with one (1) signer and an inspection of the walk. E%ISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with scaled and cracked panels. ................................................................... �lS -S�9 CITY OF ST. PAUL COUNCI FILE N0. — 7 Z�I �� PRELZMINARY ORDER By File No. S9803 thru 598036 Voting Ward_1,4,& 7 In the Matter of sidemalk reconstruction at the £ollowing locations: 598034 - Both sides Dayton Avenue from N Syndicate St to N Griggs St S98035 - West side N Hamline Avenue from W Nebraska Ave to W Hoyt Ave S98036 - Both sides Cypress Street from Wilson Ave to Wakefield Ave. *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIBENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structuresj Reconstruction (replacement o£ old sidewalk) - 57.65 per front foot £or a five (5) foot wide walk and 59.18 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. A11 other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100; of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.42 per square foot. A11 corner residential properties will.receive a credit up to the Pirst 150 feet o£ new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MU TI-RES D TIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately 54.62 per square Poot. The Council of the City oP Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1998 Public Improvement Aid. 2. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 24th dav of June. 1998 at 5:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Buildinq in the City of Saint Paul. 3. That notice o£ said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner p'rovided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the neture of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSOI3S Yeas Nays ✓enanav ✓Blakey �ostrom �oleman ✓I-�rris riLantry �iter L In Favor a Against Adopted by Council: Date c,���$" Certified Passed by Council Se�retary BY��a._ a l� � ..��... Mayor