The URL can be used to link to this page

98-567CITY OF ST. PAIIL FINAL ORDER ORIGINAL / � • � • / � � • / � �' ��' I J FILE 130. S98Q45 VOTING WARD 2 In the Matter of 598045 - Sidewalk reconstruction on both sides South Victoria Street from Palace Avenue to James Avenue Laid over from 6/1019$ under Preliminary Order 98-404 approved May 13, 1998 The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and � WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays Benanav— }'�� ✓�l akey ✓ 3�ostrom Adopted by Council: Date a'i Q(� Certified Passed by Council ecretary ✓C`oleman � In Favor ✓�arris ✓�antry �Against �iter �� t Works Sidewalks H. SIGNpTUFE PqGE3 RE GREEN SHEET DEPARiMENTDIqF�TOR �NITIAUpATE CRYA'fTOp�y 6 UDGETpIRECTOq �' NO. COUNCIL O MAYOR (Oq qgSISiAF(ij IJ FIN. E MG7. SEqVICES 1 �_ (CL1P ALL LOCA710NS FpR gGNATURE) � Coundl F �.�.�. ncwtSiED ❑ �� Reconstruct Sidewalk & Reconstrud Sidewalk With Integral Curb in Ward 2(See attached �ist� PAp�EMAL qC,C �il�. f�D•'S Sa803`J - 59$D�(o -3�- Y )MMENOATWNS:A{pr (Jawflajeq( FLWNING �pMM�S51W1 � CNIL SEflVICE COMMISSION 7. Has fiispe (sONfilm Bvel Wp�qd ury� a contrac[ for this U2 PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRqC'fS p�V� ANS WER THE FOLLOWING �UESTIONS: CIB COAIMITTEE YES NO —��-� 2 . F�as �his personlfirm ever heen a ciry employee? Partrnen[? STAFF YES NO DISTAIC7�NqL �� 3 ' �s this persoNfirm ppssess a skill not normall amployee? y possessed by arry current ciry )R7SWF{ �� {{ COUNC1�08JECTNE2 —�— YES NO Ezplain all yas answars on separete shaet and attaeh to graen sheet The problem "defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, aRernating freeRhaw cycies, service I'rfe limits, chemical additives, eMreme temperature variations, etc. These probiems occur on a citywide Ievei and must be addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncvrrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusab�e and subject to increased pedestrian injuries firom falis and possible Iftigations. The community will benefit from this project because ii wi�l provide safe detect free sidewalks for its many citizens. The sidewalk contracis are executed by private contractors, so B follows that private sector jobs ara created as a resuk of this activity. Historicaliy, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment. Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it s#ill remains controversial. This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal iniury suits, ultimately resuliing in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in eventual repairs and/or repfacement, as well as claim payouts. TOiAL AMOUtJT pp iqqNSACTION $ FUNDINGSOURCE 98-M-0668 FINANCIAL INFOqMqT10N: (EXPLAI—� � A � P �A 9•= COSTiREVENUE BUDGETED (CIqCLE ONE) YES 1 �000 C98-2T t- No � = ACITVITYNUMBER JS O�S�F-O�OOO �. CIB 98 = 5o � CITY OF ST. PAIIL FINAL ORDER ORIGINAL / � • � • / � � • / � �' ��' I J FILE 130. S98Q45 VOTING WARD 2 In the Matter of 598045 - Sidewalk reconstruction on both sides South Victoria Street from Palace Avenue to James Avenue Laid over from 6/1019$ under Preliminary Order 98-404 approved May 13, 1998 The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and � WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays Benanav— }'�� ✓�l akey ✓ 3�ostrom Adopted by Council: Date a'i Q(� Certified Passed by Council ecretary ✓C`oleman � In Favor ✓�arris ✓�antry �Against �iter �� t Works Sidewalks H. SIGNpTUFE PqGE3 RE GREEN SHEET DEPARiMENTDIqF�TOR �NITIAUpATE CRYA'fTOp�y 6 UDGETpIRECTOq �' NO. COUNCIL O MAYOR (Oq qgSISiAF(ij IJ FIN. E MG7. SEqVICES 1 �_ (CL1P ALL LOCA710NS FpR gGNATURE) � Coundl F �.�.�. ncwtSiED ❑ �� Reconstruct Sidewalk & Reconstrud Sidewalk With Integral Curb in Ward 2(See attached �ist� PAp�EMAL qC,C �il�. f�D•'S Sa803`J - 59$D�(o -3�- Y )MMENOATWNS:A{pr (Jawflajeq( FLWNING �pMM�S51W1 � CNIL SEflVICE COMMISSION 7. Has fiispe (sONfilm Bvel Wp�qd ury� a contrac[ for this U2 PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRqC'fS p�V� ANS WER THE FOLLOWING �UESTIONS: CIB COAIMITTEE YES NO —��-� 2 . F�as �his personlfirm ever heen a ciry employee? Partrnen[? STAFF YES NO DISTAIC7�NqL �� 3 ' �s this persoNfirm ppssess a skill not normall amployee? y possessed by arry current ciry )R7SWF{ �� {{ COUNC1�08JECTNE2 —�— YES NO Ezplain all yas answars on separete shaet and attaeh to graen sheet The problem "defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, aRernating freeRhaw cycies, service I'rfe limits, chemical additives, eMreme temperature variations, etc. These probiems occur on a citywide Ievei and must be addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncvrrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusab�e and subject to increased pedestrian injuries firom falis and possible Iftigations. The community will benefit from this project because ii wi�l provide safe detect free sidewalks for its many citizens. The sidewalk contracis are executed by private contractors, so B follows that private sector jobs ara created as a resuk of this activity. Historicaliy, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment. Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it s#ill remains controversial. This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal iniury suits, ultimately resuliing in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in eventual repairs and/or repfacement, as well as claim payouts. TOiAL AMOUtJT pp iqqNSACTION $ FUNDINGSOURCE 98-M-0668 FINANCIAL INFOqMqT10N: (EXPLAI—� � A � P �A 9•= COSTiREVENUE BUDGETED (CIqCLE ONE) YES 1 �000 C98-2T t- No � = ACITVITYNUMBER JS O�S�F-O�OOO �. CIB 98 = 5o � CITY OF ST. PAIIL FINAL ORDER ORIGINAL / � • � • / � � • / � �' ��' I J FILE 130. S98Q45 VOTING WARD 2 In the Matter of 598045 - Sidewalk reconstruction on both sides South Victoria Street from Palace Avenue to James Avenue Laid over from 6/1019$ under Preliminary Order 98-404 approved May 13, 1998 The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and � WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays Benanav— }'�� ✓�l akey ✓ 3�ostrom Adopted by Council: Date a'i Q(� Certified Passed by Council ecretary ✓C`oleman � In Favor ✓�arris ✓�antry �Against �iter �� t Works Sidewalks H. SIGNpTUFE PqGE3 RE GREEN SHEET DEPARiMENTDIqF�TOR �NITIAUpATE CRYA'fTOp�y 6 UDGETpIRECTOq �' NO. COUNCIL O MAYOR (Oq qgSISiAF(ij IJ FIN. E MG7. SEqVICES 1 �_ (CL1P ALL LOCA710NS FpR gGNATURE) � Coundl F �.�.�. ncwtSiED ❑ �� Reconstruct Sidewalk & Reconstrud Sidewalk With Integral Curb in Ward 2(See attached �ist� PAp�EMAL qC,C �il�. f�D•'S Sa803`J - 59$D�(o -3�- Y )MMENOATWNS:A{pr (Jawflajeq( FLWNING �pMM�S51W1 � CNIL SEflVICE COMMISSION 7. Has fiispe (sONfilm Bvel Wp�qd ury� a contrac[ for this U2 PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRqC'fS p�V� ANS WER THE FOLLOWING �UESTIONS: CIB COAIMITTEE YES NO —��-� 2 . F�as �his personlfirm ever heen a ciry employee? Partrnen[? STAFF YES NO DISTAIC7�NqL �� 3 ' �s this persoNfirm ppssess a skill not normall amployee? y possessed by arry current ciry )R7SWF{ �� {{ COUNC1�08JECTNE2 —�— YES NO Ezplain all yas answars on separete shaet and attaeh to graen sheet The problem "defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, aRernating freeRhaw cycies, service I'rfe limits, chemical additives, eMreme temperature variations, etc. These probiems occur on a citywide Ievei and must be addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncvrrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusab�e and subject to increased pedestrian injuries firom falis and possible Iftigations. The community will benefit from this project because ii wi�l provide safe detect free sidewalks for its many citizens. The sidewalk contracis are executed by private contractors, so B follows that private sector jobs ara created as a resuk of this activity. Historicaliy, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment. Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it s#ill remains controversial. This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal iniury suits, ultimately resuliing in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in eventual repairs and/or repfacement, as well as claim payouts. TOiAL AMOUtJT pp iqqNSACTION $ FUNDINGSOURCE 98-M-0668 FINANCIAL INFOqMqT10N: (EXPLAI—� � A � P �A 9•= COSTiREVENUE BUDGETED (CIqCLE ONE) YES 1 �000 C98-2T t- No � = ACITVITYNUMBER JS O�S�F-O�OOO �. CIB 98 = 5o �