The URL can be used to link to this page

98-500+- CITY OF ST. PAUI, FINAL ORDER ��r�� I lo � °� � COUNCI LE Np�. SOO i( � By / File o. S 8037,598046 Voting Ward_2 3� In the Matter o£ S98037 - Sidewalk reconstruction on both sides Bellows St. from W. Page St. to W. Baker St. 598038 - Sidewalk reconstruction on both sides Clifton St. Prom James Ave. to Randolph Ave. S98039 - Sidewalk reconstruction on the south side W. Exchange St. from St. Peter 5t. to N. Wabasha St. S98040 - Sidewalk reconstruction on both sides S. Milton St. from Palace Ave. to James Ave. 598041 - Sidewalk reconstruction with integral curb on the south side Mulberry St. from Old Kellogg Blvd. to W. Kellogg Blvd. 598042 - Sidewalk reconstruction on the north side W. Page St. from Bellows St. to Bidwell St. 598043 - Sidewalk reconstruction on both sides W. Page St. from Charlton St. to Bellows St. �598044 - Sidewalk reconstruction on both sides W. Stevens St. from Winslow Ave. to Stryker Ave. ,�c l_�.;ap� �� c`g 59$�45 - Sidewalk reconstruction on both sides S. Victoria St. from Palace Ave. to James Ave. S980A6 - Sidewalk reconstruction on the east side Webster St. from Michigan Ave. to St. Clair Ave. o��-so 0 *SSTIMATfiD CONSTRUCTIQN RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES �One, two or three £amily structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $9.18 per front foot for a six {6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 1000 of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.42 per square foot. All corner residential properties wi11 receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (MOre than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.62 per square foot. under Preliminary order l�} —�� approved 3_��$' The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a pub c hearing upon the above improvement, due notice tfiereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, there£ore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays �enanav �akey �trom Coleman Harris —Abs�r.� �ntry ,�i.reiter �o In Favor � Against l �-bser.�' Adopted by Council: Date� „_,� � p `q �_�_� �_ Certified Passed by Council Secretary BY� .�a �� , - - Mayor Yublic Hearing DaYe - July 1, 1998 RE 4-24-98 q q o g �s0 O �EPARiMENF/OFFtCfJCOUNCIL DATEINITIATED GREEN SHEET NO. ` Public Works Sidewalks 3-30-98 INITIAUDATE fNITUJJQATE CONTACT PERSON & PHONE � pEPApTMENT DIRECTOq � C7T/ CAUNCIL Larry H. Lueth - 266-6083 ��+ � cm arroaNEV � cm c�aK NUMBER FOR MOSTBEON IINCILAGENDABY(DATE ROUTING gqpG�OIRECTOR FIN.&MGT,SERVlCESDIR. Must be in Council f2�s��r�� Office or+n�c � �7 FT1C�8 5�1-9tg �MAYOp(ORASSISTANT) 1 CAUndI flB5E2fCh TOTAL i` OF SIGNATURE PAGES ]. _(CUP ALL LOGAIiDNS FOR 9GNATURE) � ASSOCV+TE PARiMENTAL ACCOUNTMR ACTION flEWESTED "3! � Reconstrud Sidewalk & Reconsiruct Sidewalk With Irrtegral Curb in Ward 2(See attached list) `��te. i�� s sago�� - s�t8oyto RECOMMENDATIONS: Apprave (A) or Rejea (F) PERSONAL SERVICE CONTHACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS: _PLANNMGCOMMISSWN _CNILSERVICECQMMISStON �� m15�ES� NOet��dunderacontrac[iwthisdepartrnen[? qe CAMMI7TEE 2. Has ihis person/firm ever been a ciry employee? — — YES NO A STAFF 3. Does tl�is persoNfirm possess a skill nol normally possessed by atty cunent city — — emptoyee? DiSTfllC7 CAUNCIL YES NO SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL oBJECTNE? �P�ain all yes answars on saparate shaet aM attach to greert sheat INITIATING PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPORNNITY (WHO, WHAT. WriEN, WNEflE, WHV): The problem "defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, afternating freefthaw cycles, service I'rfe limits, chemical addi[ives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide level and must be addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, ihe sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusable and subjec[ to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations. ADVANTAGES IF APPROVED: The communRy will benetit from this project because it will provide safe detect free sidewalks for its many citizens. The sidewalk contracts are executed by private contractors, so it follows that private sector jobs are created as a result of this activity. DISADVANTAGES iF APPROVED: fiistoricafiy, ihe sidewalk reconstruciions have created negative feedback in the area of canstruction procedure and assessment. Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half the assessme�t is City subsidized, it still remains controversia{. ., F , �iS3Ea=.":�it t'�.��; �, 's.F;�; � APR 2 � i998 DISADVANTAGES IF N05 APPROVED: This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal injury suits, ultimately resulting in the expendfture of farger doflar amounis in eventuai repairs and/or replacement, as we11 as claim payouTs. TOiALAMOUNTOFTqANSACTION$ 2>SS��S ; COST/REVENUEBUDGETED(CiRCLEONE) YES No FUNDINGSOUiiCE 98-M-o668 A, P� 9 = ��Q� pqTVITYNUMBEp �98"zT75�-�]$�"��00 FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (EXPLAIN) r - � p C C�'$ �� s l�tQdO SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECdMMENDATIONS Ward 2 o ��_soo PROJECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. BELLOWS SI: from W. Page St. to W. Baker St. S Qt�t17�� INTITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works � W�� as public necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint, a petition with one (1} signer and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches and settled paneis. .................................................................. PRO �'CT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. CLIFTON ST. from James Ave. to Randolph Ave. �yp�� INITIATING ACTION: f�7 as public necessity on walk. This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works the hasis of one {1) complaint and an inspection of the EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches and settled panels. ................................................................... PROJECT RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK WITTi INTEGRAI. CURB S.S. W. EXCHANGE ST. from St. Peter St. to N. Wabasha St. S QdiY�� INITIATING ACTIOl�i: 1 vV� as public necessity on of the waik. This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works the basis of fourteen (14} complaints and an inspection EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with asphalt patches, scaled and settled panels. .................................................................. PROJECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. S. MILTON 5T. from Palace Ave. to James Ave. �� INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works ! 11/illrl as public necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint, a petition with eighteen {18} signers and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING COiVDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, offgrade, asphalt patches and settled panels. ................................................................... PROJECT RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK WITH INTEGRAL CURB S.S. MULBERRY ST. from Old Kellogg Blvd. to W. Kellogg Blvd. -2- qg-Soo riVITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of one {1) complaint and an inspection of the 5�$0`�) W�. E%ISTTNG CONDITIONS: 'Ihis walk is poured concrete with offgrade, asphalt patches and scaled panels. ................................................................... PRO�IECT� RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK N.S. W. PAGE ST. from Bellows St. to Bidwell St. 5 �" �`� IINITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDYTIONS: This walk poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches and cracked panels. ................................................................... ,. PROJECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. W. PAGE ST. from Charlton St. to Bellows St. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on three (3) complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, disintegrated, scaled and settled panels. ................................................................... PI20JECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALH B,S. W. STEVENS ST. from Winslow Ave. to Stryker Ave. �7� I1ITITIATING ACTIdN: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of one (1) complant and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, disintegrated, scaled> settled and cracked panels. .................. ................................................. PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. S. VICTORIA ST. from Palace Ave. to James Ave. 5 �" �" INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of one (1} complaint, a petition with one (1) signer and an inspection of the walk. -3- ct.� -soo EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, scaled, settled and cracked panels. ................................................................... PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALH E.S. WEBSTER ST. from Michigan St. to St. Clair Ave. 5�� IIVITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of one (1} complaint, a petition with one {1} signer and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patces and settled panels. ................................................................... CITY OF ST. PAUL PRELIMINARY ORDER In the Matter o£ ORIGINAL COUNCZL F E By " f. :, File No, S 03 ,598046 Voting Ward Z S98037 - Sidewalk reconstruction on both sides Bellows St. from W_ Paqe St. to W. Baker St. 598038 - Sidewalk reconstruction on both sides Clifton St. from James Ave. to Randolph Ave. 598039 - Sidewalk reconstruction on the south side W. Exchange St. from St. Peter St. to N. Wabasha St. S9804Q - Sidewalk reconstzuction on both sides S. Milton St. from Palace Ave. to James Ave. 598041 - Sidewalk reconstruction with integral curb on the south side Mulberry St. from Old Kellogg Blvd. to W. Kellogg Blvd. 598042 - Sidewalk reconstruction on the north side W. Page St. £rom Bellows St. to Bidwell St. 598043 - Sidewalk reconstruction on both sides W. Page St. from Charlton St. to Bellows St. 598044 - Sidewalk reconstruction on both sides W. Stevens St. from Winslow Ave. to Stryker Ave. S98045 - Sidewalk reconstruction on both sides S. victoria St, from Palace Ave. to James Ave. 598046 - Sidewalk reconstruction on the east side Webster St. from Michigan Ave. to St. Claiz Ave. � q�-Soo 2� q8'-Soo ., . ` . ., .. R IDENT AT RATF„� (One, twp or three family structures) iteconstructian (replacement of old sidewalk) - 57.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $9.18 per £ront foot for a six (6) £oot wide walk. A11 other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100s of the actual cost estimated to be approximately 53,92 per square foot. All corner residential properties will feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk the property. receive a credit ug to the first 150 along and abutting the "long side" of MUimr-RESIDENTTAL(More than three £amily structures), NON-R. ID NTTA7, RATFS For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.62 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above imgrovement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: l. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1998 Public Improvement Aid 2. That a public hearing be had on said at 5•30 0' �o k P M in the Council Building in the City of Saint Paul. (p+h '�'.�n14 improvement on the �t day of•�+�, 1998 Chambers of the City Hall and Court House 3. That notice of said public heazing be qiven to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUI3CILPERSONS Yeas Nays B� nanav v��_a ke y �$sstrom �C,`yleman vl� ris try eiter � In Favor � Against Adopted by Council: Date � �`� �� Certified Passed by Council cretary BY �� _�,,.J . +- CITY OF ST. PAUI, FINAL ORDER ��r�� I lo � °� � COUNCI LE Np�. SOO i( � By / File o. S 8037,598046 Voting Ward_2 3� In the Matter o£ S98037 - Sidewalk reconstruction on both sides Bellows St. from W. Page St. to W. Baker St. 598038 - Sidewalk reconstruction on both sides Clifton St. Prom James Ave. to Randolph Ave. S98039 - Sidewalk reconstruction on the south side W. Exchange St. from St. Peter 5t. to N. Wabasha St. S98040 - Sidewalk reconstruction on both sides S. Milton St. from Palace Ave. to James Ave. 598041 - Sidewalk reconstruction with integral curb on the south side Mulberry St. from Old Kellogg Blvd. to W. Kellogg Blvd. 598042 - Sidewalk reconstruction on the north side W. Page St. from Bellows St. to Bidwell St. 598043 - Sidewalk reconstruction on both sides W. Page St. from Charlton St. to Bellows St. �598044 - Sidewalk reconstruction on both sides W. Stevens St. from Winslow Ave. to Stryker Ave. ,�c l_�.;ap� �� c`g 59$�45 - Sidewalk reconstruction on both sides S. Victoria St. from Palace Ave. to James Ave. S980A6 - Sidewalk reconstruction on the east side Webster St. from Michigan Ave. to St. Clair Ave. o��-so 0 *SSTIMATfiD CONSTRUCTIQN RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES �One, two or three £amily structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $9.18 per front foot for a six {6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 1000 of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.42 per square foot. All corner residential properties wi11 receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (MOre than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.62 per square foot. under Preliminary order l�} —�� approved 3_��$' The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a pub c hearing upon the above improvement, due notice tfiereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, there£ore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays �enanav �akey �trom Coleman Harris —Abs�r.� �ntry ,�i.reiter �o In Favor � Against l �-bser.�' Adopted by Council: Date� „_,� � p `q �_�_� �_ Certified Passed by Council Secretary BY� .�a �� , - - Mayor Yublic Hearing DaYe - July 1, 1998 RE 4-24-98 q q o g �s0 O �EPARiMENF/OFFtCfJCOUNCIL DATEINITIATED GREEN SHEET NO. ` Public Works Sidewalks 3-30-98 INITIAUDATE fNITUJJQATE CONTACT PERSON & PHONE � pEPApTMENT DIRECTOq � C7T/ CAUNCIL Larry H. Lueth - 266-6083 ��+ � cm arroaNEV � cm c�aK NUMBER FOR MOSTBEON IINCILAGENDABY(DATE ROUTING gqpG�OIRECTOR FIN.&MGT,SERVlCESDIR. Must be in Council f2�s��r�� Office or+n�c � �7 FT1C�8 5�1-9tg �MAYOp(ORASSISTANT) 1 CAUndI flB5E2fCh TOTAL i` OF SIGNATURE PAGES ]. _(CUP ALL LOGAIiDNS FOR 9GNATURE) � ASSOCV+TE PARiMENTAL ACCOUNTMR ACTION flEWESTED "3! � Reconstrud Sidewalk & Reconsiruct Sidewalk With Irrtegral Curb in Ward 2(See attached list) `��te. i�� s sago�� - s�t8oyto RECOMMENDATIONS: Apprave (A) or Rejea (F) PERSONAL SERVICE CONTHACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS: _PLANNMGCOMMISSWN _CNILSERVICECQMMISStON �� m15�ES� NOet��dunderacontrac[iwthisdepartrnen[? qe CAMMI7TEE 2. Has ihis person/firm ever been a ciry employee? — — YES NO A STAFF 3. Does tl�is persoNfirm possess a skill nol normally possessed by atty cunent city — — emptoyee? DiSTfllC7 CAUNCIL YES NO SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL oBJECTNE? �P�ain all yes answars on saparate shaet aM attach to greert sheat INITIATING PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPORNNITY (WHO, WHAT. WriEN, WNEflE, WHV): The problem "defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, afternating freefthaw cycles, service I'rfe limits, chemical addi[ives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide level and must be addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, ihe sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusable and subjec[ to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations. ADVANTAGES IF APPROVED: The communRy will benetit from this project because it will provide safe detect free sidewalks for its many citizens. The sidewalk contracts are executed by private contractors, so it follows that private sector jobs are created as a result of this activity. DISADVANTAGES iF APPROVED: fiistoricafiy, ihe sidewalk reconstruciions have created negative feedback in the area of canstruction procedure and assessment. Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half the assessme�t is City subsidized, it still remains controversia{. ., F , �iS3Ea=.":�it t'�.��; �, 's.F;�; � APR 2 � i998 DISADVANTAGES IF N05 APPROVED: This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal injury suits, ultimately resulting in the expendfture of farger doflar amounis in eventuai repairs and/or replacement, as we11 as claim payouTs. TOiALAMOUNTOFTqANSACTION$ 2>SS��S ; COST/REVENUEBUDGETED(CiRCLEONE) YES No FUNDINGSOUiiCE 98-M-o668 A, P� 9 = ��Q� pqTVITYNUMBEp �98"zT75�-�]$�"��00 FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (EXPLAIN) r - � p C C�'$ �� s l�tQdO SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECdMMENDATIONS Ward 2 o ��_soo PROJECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. BELLOWS SI: from W. Page St. to W. Baker St. S Qt�t17�� INTITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works � W�� as public necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint, a petition with one (1} signer and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches and settled paneis. .................................................................. PRO �'CT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. CLIFTON ST. from James Ave. to Randolph Ave. �yp�� INITIATING ACTION: f�7 as public necessity on walk. This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works the hasis of one {1) complaint and an inspection of the EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches and settled panels. ................................................................... PROJECT RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK WITTi INTEGRAI. CURB S.S. W. EXCHANGE ST. from St. Peter St. to N. Wabasha St. S QdiY�� INITIATING ACTIOl�i: 1 vV� as public necessity on of the waik. This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works the basis of fourteen (14} complaints and an inspection EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with asphalt patches, scaled and settled panels. .................................................................. PROJECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. S. MILTON 5T. from Palace Ave. to James Ave. �� INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works ! 11/illrl as public necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint, a petition with eighteen {18} signers and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING COiVDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, offgrade, asphalt patches and settled panels. ................................................................... PROJECT RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK WITH INTEGRAL CURB S.S. MULBERRY ST. from Old Kellogg Blvd. to W. Kellogg Blvd. -2- qg-Soo riVITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of one {1) complaint and an inspection of the 5�$0`�) W�. E%ISTTNG CONDITIONS: 'Ihis walk is poured concrete with offgrade, asphalt patches and scaled panels. ................................................................... PRO�IECT� RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK N.S. W. PAGE ST. from Bellows St. to Bidwell St. 5 �" �`� IINITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDYTIONS: This walk poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches and cracked panels. ................................................................... ,. PROJECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. W. PAGE ST. from Charlton St. to Bellows St. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on three (3) complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, disintegrated, scaled and settled panels. ................................................................... PI20JECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALH B,S. W. STEVENS ST. from Winslow Ave. to Stryker Ave. �7� I1ITITIATING ACTIdN: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of one (1) complant and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, disintegrated, scaled> settled and cracked panels. .................. ................................................. PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. S. VICTORIA ST. from Palace Ave. to James Ave. 5 �" �" INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of one (1} complaint, a petition with one (1) signer and an inspection of the walk. -3- ct.� -soo EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, scaled, settled and cracked panels. ................................................................... PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALH E.S. WEBSTER ST. from Michigan St. to St. Clair Ave. 5�� IIVITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of one (1} complaint, a petition with one {1} signer and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patces and settled panels. ................................................................... CITY OF ST. PAUL PRELIMINARY ORDER In the Matter o£ ORIGINAL COUNCZL F E By " f. :, File No, S 03 ,598046 Voting Ward Z S98037 - Sidewalk reconstruction on both sides Bellows St. from W_ Paqe St. to W. Baker St. 598038 - Sidewalk reconstruction on both sides Clifton St. from James Ave. to Randolph Ave. 598039 - Sidewalk reconstruction on the south side W. Exchange St. from St. Peter St. to N. Wabasha St. S9804Q - Sidewalk reconstzuction on both sides S. Milton St. from Palace Ave. to James Ave. 598041 - Sidewalk reconstruction with integral curb on the south side Mulberry St. from Old Kellogg Blvd. to W. Kellogg Blvd. 598042 - Sidewalk reconstruction on the north side W. Page St. £rom Bellows St. to Bidwell St. 598043 - Sidewalk reconstruction on both sides W. Page St. from Charlton St. to Bellows St. 598044 - Sidewalk reconstruction on both sides W. Stevens St. from Winslow Ave. to Stryker Ave. S98045 - Sidewalk reconstruction on both sides S. victoria St, from Palace Ave. to James Ave. 598046 - Sidewalk reconstruction on the east side Webster St. from Michigan Ave. to St. Claiz Ave. � q�-Soo 2� q8'-Soo ., . ` . ., .. R IDENT AT RATF„� (One, twp or three family structures) iteconstructian (replacement of old sidewalk) - 57.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $9.18 per £ront foot for a six (6) £oot wide walk. A11 other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100s of the actual cost estimated to be approximately 53,92 per square foot. All corner residential properties will feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk the property. receive a credit ug to the first 150 along and abutting the "long side" of MUimr-RESIDENTTAL(More than three £amily structures), NON-R. ID NTTA7, RATFS For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.62 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above imgrovement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: l. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1998 Public Improvement Aid 2. That a public hearing be had on said at 5•30 0' �o k P M in the Council Building in the City of Saint Paul. (p+h '�'.�n14 improvement on the �t day of•�+�, 1998 Chambers of the City Hall and Court House 3. That notice of said public heazing be qiven to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUI3CILPERSONS Yeas Nays B� nanav v��_a ke y �$sstrom �C,`yleman vl� ris try eiter � In Favor � Against Adopted by Council: Date � �`� �� Certified Passed by Council cretary BY � ��_�,,.J . +- CITY OF ST. PAUI, FINAL ORDER ��r�� I lo � °� � COUNCI LE Np�. SOO i( � By / File o. S 8037,598046 Voting Ward_2 3� In the Matter o£ S98037 - Sidewalk reconstruction on both sides Bellows St. from W. Page St. to W. Baker St. 598038 - Sidewalk reconstruction on both sides Clifton St. Prom James Ave. to Randolph Ave. S98039 - Sidewalk reconstruction on the south side W. Exchange St. from St. Peter 5t. to N. Wabasha St. S98040 - Sidewalk reconstruction on both sides S. Milton St. from Palace Ave. to James Ave. 598041 - Sidewalk reconstruction with integral curb on the south side Mulberry St. from Old Kellogg Blvd. to W. Kellogg Blvd. 598042 - Sidewalk reconstruction on the north side W. Page St. from Bellows St. to Bidwell St. 598043 - Sidewalk reconstruction on both sides W. Page St. from Charlton St. to Bellows St. �598044 - Sidewalk reconstruction on both sides W. Stevens St. from Winslow Ave. to Stryker Ave. ,�c l_�.;ap� �� c`g 59$�45 - Sidewalk reconstruction on both sides S. Victoria St. from Palace Ave. to James Ave. S980A6 - Sidewalk reconstruction on the east side Webster St. from Michigan Ave. to St. Clair Ave. o��-so 0 *SSTIMATfiD CONSTRUCTIQN RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES �One, two or three £amily structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $9.18 per front foot for a six {6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 1000 of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.42 per square foot. All corner residential properties wi11 receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (MOre than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.62 per square foot. under Preliminary order l�} —�� approved 3_��$' The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a pub c hearing upon the above improvement, due notice tfiereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, there£ore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays �enanav �akey �trom Coleman Harris —Abs�r.� �ntry ,�i.reiter �o In Favor � Against l �-bser.�' Adopted by Council: Date� „_,� � p `q �_�_� �_ Certified Passed by Council Secretary BY� .�a �� , - - Mayor Yublic Hearing DaYe - July 1, 1998 RE 4-24-98 q q o g �s0 O �EPARiMENF/OFFtCfJCOUNCIL DATEINITIATED GREEN SHEET NO. ` Public Works Sidewalks 3-30-98 INITIAUDATE fNITUJJQATE CONTACT PERSON & PHONE � pEPApTMENT DIRECTOq � C7T/ CAUNCIL Larry H. Lueth - 266-6083 ��+ � cm arroaNEV � cm c�aK NUMBER FOR MOSTBEON IINCILAGENDABY(DATE ROUTING gqpG�OIRECTOR FIN.&MGT,SERVlCESDIR. Must be in Council f2�s��r�� Office or+n�c � �7 FT1C�8 5�1-9tg �MAYOp(ORASSISTANT) 1 CAUndI flB5E2fCh TOTAL i` OF SIGNATURE PAGES ]. _(CUP ALL LOGAIiDNS FOR 9GNATURE) � ASSOCV+TE PARiMENTAL ACCOUNTMR ACTION flEWESTED "3! � Reconstrud Sidewalk & Reconsiruct Sidewalk With Irrtegral Curb in Ward 2(See attached list) `��te. i�� s sago�� - s�t8oyto RECOMMENDATIONS: Apprave (A) or Rejea (F) PERSONAL SERVICE CONTHACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS: _PLANNMGCOMMISSWN _CNILSERVICECQMMISStON �� m15�ES� NOet��dunderacontrac[iwthisdepartrnen[? qe CAMMI7TEE 2. Has ihis person/firm ever been a ciry employee? — — YES NO A STAFF 3. Does tl�is persoNfirm possess a skill nol normally possessed by atty cunent city — — emptoyee? DiSTfllC7 CAUNCIL YES NO SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL oBJECTNE? �P�ain all yes answars on saparate shaet aM attach to greert sheat INITIATING PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPORNNITY (WHO, WHAT. WriEN, WNEflE, WHV): The problem "defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, afternating freefthaw cycles, service I'rfe limits, chemical addi[ives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide level and must be addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, ihe sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusable and subjec[ to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations. ADVANTAGES IF APPROVED: The communRy will benetit from this project because it will provide safe detect free sidewalks for its many citizens. The sidewalk contracts are executed by private contractors, so it follows that private sector jobs are created as a result of this activity. DISADVANTAGES iF APPROVED: fiistoricafiy, ihe sidewalk reconstruciions have created negative feedback in the area of canstruction procedure and assessment. Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half the assessme�t is City subsidized, it still remains controversia{. ., F , �iS3Ea=.":�it t'�.��; �, 's.F;�; � APR 2 � i998 DISADVANTAGES IF N05 APPROVED: This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal injury suits, ultimately resulting in the expendfture of farger doflar amounis in eventuai repairs and/or replacement, as we11 as claim payouTs. TOiALAMOUNTOFTqANSACTION$ 2>SS��S ; COST/REVENUEBUDGETED(CiRCLEONE) YES No FUNDINGSOUiiCE 98-M-o668 A, P� 9 = ��Q� pqTVITYNUMBEp �98"zT75�-�]$�"��00 FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (EXPLAIN) r - � p C C�'$ �� s l�tQdO SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECdMMENDATIONS Ward 2 o ��_soo PROJECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. BELLOWS SI: from W. Page St. to W. Baker St. S Qt�t17�� INTITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works � W�� as public necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint, a petition with one (1} signer and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches and settled paneis. .................................................................. PRO �'CT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. CLIFTON ST. from James Ave. to Randolph Ave. �yp�� INITIATING ACTION: f�7 as public necessity on walk. This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works the hasis of one {1) complaint and an inspection of the EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches and settled panels. ................................................................... PROJECT RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK WITTi INTEGRAI. CURB S.S. W. EXCHANGE ST. from St. Peter St. to N. Wabasha St. S QdiY�� INITIATING ACTIOl�i: 1 vV� as public necessity on of the waik. This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works the basis of fourteen (14} complaints and an inspection EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with asphalt patches, scaled and settled panels. .................................................................. PROJECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. S. MILTON 5T. from Palace Ave. to James Ave. �� INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works ! 11/illrl as public necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint, a petition with eighteen {18} signers and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING COiVDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, offgrade, asphalt patches and settled panels. ................................................................... PROJECT RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK WITH INTEGRAL CURB S.S. MULBERRY ST. from Old Kellogg Blvd. to W. Kellogg Blvd. -2- qg-Soo riVITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of one {1) complaint and an inspection of the 5�$0`�) W�. E%ISTTNG CONDITIONS: 'Ihis walk is poured concrete with offgrade, asphalt patches and scaled panels. ................................................................... PRO�IECT� RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK N.S. W. PAGE ST. from Bellows St. to Bidwell St. 5 �" �`� IINITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDYTIONS: This walk poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches and cracked panels. ................................................................... ,. PROJECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. W. PAGE ST. from Charlton St. to Bellows St. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on three (3) complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, disintegrated, scaled and settled panels. ................................................................... PI20JECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALH B,S. W. STEVENS ST. from Winslow Ave. to Stryker Ave. �7� I1ITITIATING ACTIdN: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of one (1) complant and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, disintegrated, scaled> settled and cracked panels. .................. ................................................. PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. S. VICTORIA ST. from Palace Ave. to James Ave. 5 �" �" INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of one (1} complaint, a petition with one (1) signer and an inspection of the walk. -3- ct.� -soo EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, scaled, settled and cracked panels. ................................................................... PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALH E.S. WEBSTER ST. from Michigan St. to St. Clair Ave. 5�� IIVITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of one (1} complaint, a petition with one {1} signer and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patces and settled panels. ................................................................... CITY OF ST. PAUL PRELIMINARY ORDER In the Matter o£ ORIGINAL COUNCZL F E By " f. :, File No, S 03 ,598046 Voting Ward Z S98037 - Sidewalk reconstruction on both sides Bellows St. from W_ Paqe St. to W. Baker St. 598038 - Sidewalk reconstruction on both sides Clifton St. from James Ave. to Randolph Ave. 598039 - Sidewalk reconstruction on the south side W. Exchange St. from St. Peter St. to N. Wabasha St. S9804Q - Sidewalk reconstzuction on both sides S. Milton St. from Palace Ave. to James Ave. 598041 - Sidewalk reconstruction with integral curb on the south side Mulberry St. from Old Kellogg Blvd. to W. Kellogg Blvd. 598042 - Sidewalk reconstruction on the north side W. Page St. £rom Bellows St. to Bidwell St. 598043 - Sidewalk reconstruction on both sides W. Page St. from Charlton St. to Bellows St. 598044 - Sidewalk reconstruction on both sides W. Stevens St. from Winslow Ave. to Stryker Ave. S98045 - Sidewalk reconstruction on both sides S. victoria St, from Palace Ave. to James Ave. 598046 - Sidewalk reconstruction on the east side Webster St. from Michigan Ave. to St. Claiz Ave. � q�-Soo 2� q8'-Soo ., . ` . ., .. R IDENT AT RATF„� (One, twp or three family structures) iteconstructian (replacement of old sidewalk) - 57.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $9.18 per £ront foot for a six (6) £oot wide walk. A11 other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100s of the actual cost estimated to be approximately 53,92 per square foot. All corner residential properties will feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk the property. receive a credit ug to the first 150 along and abutting the "long side" of MUimr-RESIDENTTAL(More than three £amily structures), NON-R. ID NTTA7, RATFS For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.62 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above imgrovement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: l. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1998 Public Improvement Aid 2. That a public hearing be had on said at 5•30 0' �o k P M in the Council Building in the City of Saint Paul. (p+h '�'.�n14 improvement on the �t day of•�+�, 1998 Chambers of the City Hall and Court House 3. That notice of said public heazing be qiven to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUI3CILPERSONS Yeas Nays B� nanav v��_a ke y �$sstrom �C,`yleman vl� ris try eiter � In Favor � Against Adopted by Council: Date � �`� �� Certified Passed by Council cretary BY � ��_�,,.J .