The URL can be used to link to this page

98-472CITY OF ST. PAUI, FINPS, ORDER In the Matter of B `�-`��`� (�� 52 File No._ 8024,598025 0 R l G I N A L Voting Ward_2 598024 - Sidewalk reconstruction on both sides W Colorado St £rom Stryker Ave to Hall Ave. 598025 - Sidewalk reconstruction on both sides Stryker Ave from W Winifred St to W Congress St & the south side W Winifred St from Stryker Ave to Ha11 Ave. *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTIOYJ RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structuresJ Recoastruction (replacement of o1d sidewalk) -$7.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $9.18 per front foot for a six {6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New oonstruCtion (where na walk existed) - 100g of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.42 per square foot. All corner residential properties wi11 receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family ructures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100% f actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.62 per square foot. under Preliminary The Council of the City above improvement, due notic Charter; and � ,'lSaint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the thereof having been given as prescribed by the City WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and lias fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all ea�enses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas /- Nays ✓ B anav Blakey Bos trom — ��SEr�� ✓oleman �rris ✓�antry Reiter — ��Scr.�S"' Adopted by Council: Date q�(r Certified Passed by Council Se retary S In F< CZ_Agaii a A or rublic Hearing Date — PARTMENTlOFFICElCOUNCIL iblic Works Sidewalks H. 27, 1948 RE 3-20-48 GREEN SHEET � q NUMBER�H QClTYATiORNEY � OHOfR Q��'ETDIRECTOR ; � MAYOR (OR ASSISiANT} _ j _(CW ALt locATIWS FOR 9GNANNt7 � ASSOCNTE � FW.& Reconstruct Sidewalk & Reconsuud Sidewalk Wdh Irrtegral Curb in Ward 2(See attached I'�st) � ` � � 9$025 RECOMMEN0A7awS:aFpare (a1 � Reiea (Po pERSONAL SERYICE COMRACTS NUST ANSWER THE FOILOWING QUESTIONS: _ pIANNNIC (AMµ1SSpN _qVIL SERVICE COMMISSION �� m�s P� � NO � Wotk¢d u�Mer a contract for this depariment? YE qe COMMmEE 2. Has ihis persorvfirm ever been a ciry employee? — — YES NO A STAFF 3. Does this perso�Vfirm possess a skiVl not normafty possessed by azry wrrent city — employee? D�SiRICTCWNC�I YES NO sUPaoRTS WtticH CAUNCiI O&1ECTIYE� �P��n all yes allswarvt on separate shaet and attaeh to gr6en sheet � 771qTING PflOBLEM. ISSUE.OPP�ftTUNITY (WF10, WHAT, WNEN. WHEftE. WHY): The problem "defective sidewaik" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade materiaf, afternating freefthaw cycles, serv'�ce 1'rfe limits, chemicaf add'Rives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide level and must be addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Lefl uncorrected, ihe sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusabfe and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations. The community will benefit trom this projeci because R will provide safe detec[ free sidewalks for its many citizens. The sidewalk contracts are executed by private contractors, so it follows that private sector jobs are created as a resuft of ihis activity. Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construaion procedure and assessment. Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it still remains controversiai. ��,� � ��.ry�£ ( b �!� This option wouid aliow ihe infirastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal injury suits, ultimatety resuiting in the expenditure aF larger dollar amounts in eventual repairs and/or reptacement, as well as claim payguts. iOTALAMWNTOFTRANSACTIONS 6>�96.32 COST7REV5NllEBUDCETSD{CIRCLEONE} YES NO FUNDINGSOUpCE gB�M^QECFi A. PFA �IH = 61II�OQQ ACITYITYNUMBER �9$' FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (EXPLAW� B � F�ST = 3 Z� p OOO c, cta g8 = 50,000 � Ward 2 PROJECT� RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALH B.S. W. COIARADO ST. from Stryker Ave. to Hall Ave. � l! �� INITIATING ACTION; T'his order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, scaled and cracked panels. ................................................................... ��b25 P. ROJECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK WITH INTEGRAL CURB $.S. STRXF�R AVE. from W. Winifred St. to W. Congress St. & S.S. W. WIIVIFRED ST. from Stryker Ave. to Hall Ave. I1vITIATING ACTION: This order was irutiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with asphalt patches, scaled and cracked panels. � r CITY OF ST. PAUI. PRELIMINAR7t ORDER In the Matter of oR��1NA� BY {.L_ File No Voting 8624,S98025 598�24 - Sidewalk reconstruction on both sides W Colorado St from Stryker Ave to Hall Ave. S98025 - Sidewalk reconstruction on both sides Stryker Ave from W WiniPred St to W Congress St & the south side W Winifred St from Stryker Ave to Hall Ave. *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement o£ old sidewalk) -$?.65 per front foot for a five (5J foot wide walk and $9.18 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated aceordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.42 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet o£ new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures?, NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.62 per square £oot. � 4 The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1 Z �� That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, tinanced by assessments and 1998 Public Improvement Aid. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 27th day of May, 1998, at 5:3Q o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court Aause Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature o£ the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays +//�enanav �lakey �ostrom .�01 eman .�T�arris �antry �iter �In Favor � Against Adopted by Council: Date� 1��3' Certified Passed by Council Secretary By-� r.� � �,� � Mayor qP-4�Y CITY OF ST. PAUI, FINPS, ORDER In the Matter of B `�-`��`� (�� 52 File No._ 8024,598025 0 R l G I N A L Voting Ward_2 598024 - Sidewalk reconstruction on both sides W Colorado St £rom Stryker Ave to Hall Ave. 598025 - Sidewalk reconstruction on both sides Stryker Ave from W Winifred St to W Congress St & the south side W Winifred St from Stryker Ave to Ha11 Ave. *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTIOYJ RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structuresJ Recoastruction (replacement of o1d sidewalk) -$7.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $9.18 per front foot for a six {6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New oonstruCtion (where na walk existed) - 100g of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.42 per square foot. All corner residential properties wi11 receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family ructures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100% f actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.62 per square foot. under Preliminary The Council of the City above improvement, due notic Charter; and � ,'lSaint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the thereof having been given as prescribed by the City WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and lias fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all ea�enses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas /- Nays ✓ B anav Blakey Bos trom — ��SEr�� ✓oleman �rris ✓�antry Reiter — ��Scr.�S"' Adopted by Council: Date q�(r Certified Passed by Council Se retary S In F< CZ_Agaii a A or rublic Hearing Date — PARTMENTlOFFICElCOUNCIL iblic Works Sidewalks H. 27, 1948 RE 3-20-48 GREEN SHEET � q NUMBER�H QClTYATiORNEY � OHOfR Q��'ETDIRECTOR ; � MAYOR (OR ASSISiANT} _ j _(CW ALt locATIWS FOR 9GNANNt7 � ASSOCNTE � FW.& Reconstruct Sidewalk & Reconsuud Sidewalk Wdh Irrtegral Curb in Ward 2(See attached I'�st) � ` � � 9$025 RECOMMEN0A7awS:aFpare (a1 � Reiea (Po pERSONAL SERYICE COMRACTS NUST ANSWER THE FOILOWING QUESTIONS: _ pIANNNIC (AMµ1SSpN _qVIL SERVICE COMMISSION �� m�s P� � NO � Wotk¢d u�Mer a contract for this depariment? YE qe COMMmEE 2. Has ihis persorvfirm ever been a ciry employee? — — YES NO A STAFF 3. Does this perso�Vfirm possess a skiVl not normafty possessed by azry wrrent city — employee? D�SiRICTCWNC�I YES NO sUPaoRTS WtticH CAUNCiI O&1ECTIYE� �P��n all yes allswarvt on separate shaet and attaeh to gr6en sheet � 771qTING PflOBLEM. ISSUE.OPP�ftTUNITY (WF10, WHAT, WNEN. WHEftE. WHY): The problem "defective sidewaik" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade materiaf, afternating freefthaw cycles, serv'�ce 1'rfe limits, chemicaf add'Rives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide level and must be addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Lefl uncorrected, ihe sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusabfe and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations. The community will benefit trom this projeci because R will provide safe detec[ free sidewalks for its many citizens. The sidewalk contracts are executed by private contractors, so it follows that private sector jobs are created as a resuft of ihis activity. Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construaion procedure and assessment. Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it still remains controversiai. ��,� � ��.ry�£ ( b �!� This option wouid aliow ihe infirastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal injury suits, ultimatety resuiting in the expenditure aF larger dollar amounts in eventual repairs and/or reptacement, as well as claim payguts. iOTALAMWNTOFTRANSACTIONS 6>�96.32 COST7REV5NllEBUDCETSD{CIRCLEONE} YES NO FUNDINGSOUpCE gB�M^QECFi A. PFA �IH = 61II�OQQ ACITYITYNUMBER �9$' FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (EXPLAW� B � F�ST = 3 Z� p OOO c, cta g8 = 50,000 � Ward 2 PROJECT� RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALH B.S. W. COIARADO ST. from Stryker Ave. to Hall Ave. � l! �� INITIATING ACTION; T'his order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, scaled and cracked panels. ................................................................... ��b25 P. ROJECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK WITH INTEGRAL CURB $.S. STRXF�R AVE. from W. Winifred St. to W. Congress St. & S.S. W. WIIVIFRED ST. from Stryker Ave. to Hall Ave. I1vITIATING ACTION: This order was irutiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with asphalt patches, scaled and cracked panels. � r CITY OF ST. PAUI. PRELIMINAR7t ORDER In the Matter of oR��1NA� BY {.L_ File No Voting 8624,S98025 598�24 - Sidewalk reconstruction on both sides W Colorado St from Stryker Ave to Hall Ave. S98025 - Sidewalk reconstruction on both sides Stryker Ave from W WiniPred St to W Congress St & the south side W Winifred St from Stryker Ave to Hall Ave. *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement o£ old sidewalk) -$?.65 per front foot for a five (5J foot wide walk and $9.18 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated aceordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.42 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet o£ new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures?, NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.62 per square £oot. � 4 The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1 Z �� That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, tinanced by assessments and 1998 Public Improvement Aid. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 27th day of May, 1998, at 5:3Q o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court Aause Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature o£ the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays +//�enanav �lakey �ostrom .�01 eman .�T�arris �antry �iter �In Favor � Against Adopted by Council: Date� 1��3' Certified Passed by Council Secretary By-� r.� � �,� � Mayor qP-4�Y CITY OF ST. PAUI, FINPS, ORDER In the Matter of B `�-`��`� (�� 52 File No._ 8024,598025 0 R l G I N A L Voting Ward_2 598024 - Sidewalk reconstruction on both sides W Colorado St £rom Stryker Ave to Hall Ave. 598025 - Sidewalk reconstruction on both sides Stryker Ave from W Winifred St to W Congress St & the south side W Winifred St from Stryker Ave to Ha11 Ave. *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTIOYJ RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structuresJ Recoastruction (replacement of o1d sidewalk) -$7.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $9.18 per front foot for a six {6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New oonstruCtion (where na walk existed) - 100g of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.42 per square foot. All corner residential properties wi11 receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family ructures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100% f actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.62 per square foot. under Preliminary The Council of the City above improvement, due notic Charter; and � ,'lSaint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the thereof having been given as prescribed by the City WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and lias fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all ea�enses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas /- Nays ✓ B anav Blakey Bos trom — ��SEr�� ✓oleman �rris ✓�antry Reiter — ��Scr.�S"' Adopted by Council: Date q�(r Certified Passed by Council Se retary S In F< CZ_Agaii a A or rublic Hearing Date — PARTMENTlOFFICElCOUNCIL iblic Works Sidewalks H. 27, 1948 RE 3-20-48 GREEN SHEET � q NUMBER�H QClTYATiORNEY � OHOfR Q��'ETDIRECTOR ; � MAYOR (OR ASSISiANT} _ j _(CW ALt locATIWS FOR 9GNANNt7 � ASSOCNTE � FW.& Reconstruct Sidewalk & Reconsuud Sidewalk Wdh Irrtegral Curb in Ward 2(See attached I'�st) � ` � � 9$025 RECOMMEN0A7awS:aFpare (a1 � Reiea (Po pERSONAL SERYICE COMRACTS NUST ANSWER THE FOILOWING QUESTIONS: _ pIANNNIC (AMµ1SSpN _qVIL SERVICE COMMISSION �� m�s P� � NO � Wotk¢d u�Mer a contract for this depariment? YE qe COMMmEE 2. Has ihis persorvfirm ever been a ciry employee? — — YES NO A STAFF 3. Does this perso�Vfirm possess a skiVl not normafty possessed by azry wrrent city — employee? D�SiRICTCWNC�I YES NO sUPaoRTS WtticH CAUNCiI O&1ECTIYE� �P��n all yes allswarvt on separate shaet and attaeh to gr6en sheet � 771qTING PflOBLEM. ISSUE.OPP�ftTUNITY (WF10, WHAT, WNEN. WHEftE. WHY): The problem "defective sidewaik" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade materiaf, afternating freefthaw cycles, serv'�ce 1'rfe limits, chemicaf add'Rives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide level and must be addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Lefl uncorrected, ihe sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusabfe and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations. The community will benefit trom this projeci because R will provide safe detec[ free sidewalks for its many citizens. The sidewalk contracts are executed by private contractors, so it follows that private sector jobs are created as a resuft of ihis activity. Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construaion procedure and assessment. Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it still remains controversiai. ��,� � ��.ry�£ ( b �!� This option wouid aliow ihe infirastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal injury suits, ultimatety resuiting in the expenditure aF larger dollar amounts in eventual repairs and/or reptacement, as well as claim payguts. iOTALAMWNTOFTRANSACTIONS 6>�96.32 COST7REV5NllEBUDCETSD{CIRCLEONE} YES NO FUNDINGSOUpCE gB�M^QECFi A. PFA �IH = 61II�OQQ ACITYITYNUMBER �9$' FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (EXPLAW� B � F�ST = 3 Z� p OOO c, cta g8 = 50,000 � Ward 2 PROJECT� RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALH B.S. W. COIARADO ST. from Stryker Ave. to Hall Ave. � l! �� INITIATING ACTION; T'his order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, scaled and cracked panels. ................................................................... ��b25 P. ROJECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK WITH INTEGRAL CURB $.S. STRXF�R AVE. from W. Winifred St. to W. Congress St. & S.S. W. WIIVIFRED ST. from Stryker Ave. to Hall Ave. I1vITIATING ACTION: This order was irutiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with asphalt patches, scaled and cracked panels. � r CITY OF ST. PAUI. PRELIMINAR7t ORDER In the Matter of oR��1NA� BY {.L_ File No Voting 8624,S98025 598�24 - Sidewalk reconstruction on both sides W Colorado St from Stryker Ave to Hall Ave. S98025 - Sidewalk reconstruction on both sides Stryker Ave from W WiniPred St to W Congress St & the south side W Winifred St from Stryker Ave to Hall Ave. *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement o£ old sidewalk) -$?.65 per front foot for a five (5J foot wide walk and $9.18 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated aceordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.42 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet o£ new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures?, NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.62 per square £oot. � 4 The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1 Z �� That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, tinanced by assessments and 1998 Public Improvement Aid. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 27th day of May, 1998, at 5:3Q o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court Aause Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature o£ the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays +//�enanav �lakey �ostrom .�01 eman .�T�arris �antry �iter �In Favor � Against Adopted by Council: Date� 1��3' Certified Passed by Council Secretary By-� r.� � �,� � Mayor qP-4�Y