Loading...
98-471CITY OF ST. PAUL FII3AL ORDER In the Matter oE courae ztis rro. �� .S� By ��' ''�/'_� 0 R� G I N A L Voting�Ward9804&7598005 598004 - Sidewalk reconstruction on both sides Goodrich Ave from S Fairview Ave to S Howell St 598005 - Sidewalk reconstruction on the north side of E Third St from Barclay St to Hazelwood St & the west side Hazelwood St from E Third St to Fremont Ave at 1535 E Third St only. *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of o1d sidewalkJ -$7.65 ger front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $9.18 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 1000 of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.42 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 £eet of new or reconstructecl sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.62 per square foot. under Preliminary order � c� — o� � ot approved ��_ 1\ �' The Council of the City of Saint Paul lias conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of 5aint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSOI3S Yeas � Nays ✓Benanav �akey sos trom — R-bs er�` �leman �rris �ntry Reiter � �bsev.� �In Favor �Against � (abs� Adopted by Council: Date_���� Certified Passed by Council Secretary or ___,..�a�s uaze – May 27, 1998 Works Sidewalks �:3�:3+Yk3 RE 3-20-98 qa �y�} EO GREEN SHEET No.�7� iNmnwnh --narrwm ------------____�—^ _ wswavervonar�uami4-8-98 Roun"� BUOGEfDiFECTOR in Council Research Office °� y 3-27-98 �bavoxzoanss�sn� ANRE PA(iES _ i —(CUP ALL IACA710NS PoR SIGWINRE� n ASSOCN7E Reconstsuct Sidewalk in Wards 4 8 7(See atiached tist) & MGT. SERVICES "�.OMMENDATIONS: AFprow iA) a p� (Kl pERSONAI SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLON7NG QUESTIONS: _ PWJNING WMMISSKX! _CNIL SEFVICE COMMISSION �. ��� P�SOn7�r NOef worked under a contrac[ tor U»is departm¢nt? Y C18 COMMnTEE 2. Nas this Person/Frm ever been a d/y empbyee? — — YES NO _ STaFF _ 3. Daes V�is personlfirm possess a ski11 not rwrmally possessed 6y any curtent city employee? DISTP7CTCOUNCIL YES NO PPORTS WH�GH COf1NCIL OBJECTNE? �P�a�� atl yas answars on saparate sheet and attach to green sheet ,71ATING PR08LEM, ISSUE.OPPOR'NNIN (NMO. W4iAT, WHEN, WHEqE, WH1�: The problem "defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, akernating freeRhaw cycles, service I'rfe limits, chemical add0ives, eMreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide level and must be addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk candition would worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusable and su6ject to increased pedestrian injuries from faiis and possible litigations. The c,ommunity wifl henefit from this project because it wiU provide safe detect free sidewa&s for its many citizens. The sidewalk contracts are executed by private contractors, so R follows that private sectar jobs are created as a resuft of this activiry. H+storically, the sidewaik reconstructions have created negative feedback in ihe area of construction procedure and assessment. Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the tact up to one-haif the assessment is City subsidized, ft stifi remains controversial. c+ tf -?? r,c.:. r. �fti".a ��1., �.y.� � ..,:,��. �'� ,' �..... .... '�, �. r�wTA This option would aifow the irrfrastructure ot sidewalk stock to detetiotate, which in turn, will generate more personal injury suits, uRimately resufting in the expenditure ofi larger dotlar amounts in eventual repairs andlor-repiacemeM, as wefl asclaim-payouts. WNDINGSWRCE FINANCIAL INFORMATION: :TION S G� j 1 j, Z6 -�M�0668 q; PtA 98 � n, Ha'1 = S�7�uvv c, crs 98 = 5o,aao C6STJREYENUE BUDGETED (CIRCLE ONE) ACINRY IiUMBEA �.. __. -.� _. q�-=4�t1 SLJMMARY OF E1�3GINEERII�SG RECOIv11V1ENDATION Ward 4 PROJECT• RECONSTRUCT SII?EWLiLK B.S. GOODRICH AVE. from S. Fairview Ave. to S. Howell St. 51 S4� INITIATING ACTION: T`his order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of one {1) complaint, a petition with one (1J signer and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING COPIDITIOPIS: Tkiis walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches and cracked panels. ................................................................... ., : SUNIMARY OF ENGINEERIIVG RECO1V11VIE1VDATION Ward 7 a�-�.n� PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALB N.S. E. TF�RD ST. from Barclay St. to Ha2elwood St. & W.S. HAZELWOOD ST. from E. Third St. to Fremont Ave. at 1535 E. Third St. Oniy. a� f WV� INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of one {1) complaint, a petition with one {1) signer and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves and asphalt patches. ................................................................... Q�' 4'l� � CITY OF 3T. PAUL COUNCI � I E NO_ \\ ��l�l�_'��3-�i.: -- -- _ __ a 3 PRELIMINARY.ORDER - O R� G� NA L Voting�Ward98004 398005 Iu the Mattes o£ 598004 - Sidewalk reconstruction on both sides Goodrich Ave from S Fairview Ave to S Howell St 598005 - Sidewalk reconstruction on the north side of E Third St from Barclay St to Hazelwood St & the west side Hazelwood St from E Third St to Fremont Ave at 1535 E Third St only. *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (dne, two or three family structures} Reconstructioa (replacement o£ old sidewalk) -$7.65 per front foot for a £ive (5) foot wide walk and $9.18 per front toot for a six (6) foot wide walk. A11 other widths will be prorated accordingly. New coastruction (where no walk existed) - 100$ of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.42 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100g of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.62 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 3 Fi 3 That the said raport and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1998 Fublic Improvement Aid. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 27th day of May, 1998, at 5:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the city of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays ✓Benanav �lakey ✓$ostrom v�oleman �FTarri s �antry �Reiter ? 2n Favor G Against Adopted by Council: Date��1�q Y Certified Passed by Council Secretary BY� a � -->� tin Mayor CITY OF ST. PAUL FII3AL ORDER In the Matter oE courae ztis rro. �� .S� By ��' ''�/'_� 0 R� G I N A L Voting�Ward9804&7598005 598004 - Sidewalk reconstruction on both sides Goodrich Ave from S Fairview Ave to S Howell St 598005 - Sidewalk reconstruction on the north side of E Third St from Barclay St to Hazelwood St & the west side Hazelwood St from E Third St to Fremont Ave at 1535 E Third St only. *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of o1d sidewalkJ -$7.65 ger front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $9.18 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 1000 of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.42 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 £eet of new or reconstructecl sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.62 per square foot. under Preliminary order � c� — o� � ot approved ��_ 1\ �' The Council of the City of Saint Paul lias conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of 5aint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSOI3S Yeas � Nays ✓Benanav �akey sos trom — R-bs er�` �leman �rris �ntry Reiter � �bsev.� �In Favor �Against � (abs� Adopted by Council: Date_���� Certified Passed by Council Secretary or ___,..�a�s uaze – May 27, 1998 Works Sidewalks �:3�:3+Yk3 RE 3-20-98 qa �y�} EO GREEN SHEET No.�7� iNmnwnh --narrwm ------------____�—^ _ wswavervonar�uami4-8-98 Roun"� BUOGEfDiFECTOR in Council Research Office °� y 3-27-98 �bavoxzoanss�sn� ANRE PA(iES _ i —(CUP ALL IACA710NS PoR SIGWINRE� n ASSOCN7E Reconstsuct Sidewalk in Wards 4 8 7(See atiached tist) & MGT. SERVICES "�.OMMENDATIONS: AFprow iA) a p� (Kl pERSONAI SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLON7NG QUESTIONS: _ PWJNING WMMISSKX! _CNIL SEFVICE COMMISSION �. ��� P�SOn7�r NOef worked under a contrac[ tor U»is departm¢nt? Y C18 COMMnTEE 2. Nas this Person/Frm ever been a d/y empbyee? — — YES NO _ STaFF _ 3. Daes V�is personlfirm possess a ski11 not rwrmally possessed 6y any curtent city employee? DISTP7CTCOUNCIL YES NO PPORTS WH�GH COf1NCIL OBJECTNE? �P�a�� atl yas answars on saparate sheet and attach to green sheet ,71ATING PR08LEM, ISSUE.OPPOR'NNIN (NMO. W4iAT, WHEN, WHEqE, WH1�: The problem "defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, akernating freeRhaw cycles, service I'rfe limits, chemical add0ives, eMreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide level and must be addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk candition would worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusable and su6ject to increased pedestrian injuries from faiis and possible litigations. The c,ommunity wifl henefit from this project because it wiU provide safe detect free sidewa&s for its many citizens. The sidewalk contracts are executed by private contractors, so R follows that private sectar jobs are created as a resuft of this activiry. H+storically, the sidewaik reconstructions have created negative feedback in ihe area of construction procedure and assessment. Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the tact up to one-haif the assessment is City subsidized, ft stifi remains controversial. c+ tf -?? r,c.:. r. �fti".a ��1., �.y.� � ..,:,��. �'� ,' �..... .... '�, �. r�wTA This option would aifow the irrfrastructure ot sidewalk stock to detetiotate, which in turn, will generate more personal injury suits, uRimately resufting in the expenditure ofi larger dotlar amounts in eventual repairs andlor-repiacemeM, as wefl asclaim-payouts. WNDINGSWRCE FINANCIAL INFORMATION: :TION S G� j 1 j, Z6 -�M�0668 q; PtA 98 � n, Ha'1 = S�7�uvv c, crs 98 = 5o,aao C6STJREYENUE BUDGETED (CIRCLE ONE) ACINRY IiUMBEA �.. __. -.� _. q�-=4�t1 SLJMMARY OF E1�3GINEERII�SG RECOIv11V1ENDATION Ward 4 PROJECT• RECONSTRUCT SII?EWLiLK B.S. GOODRICH AVE. from S. Fairview Ave. to S. Howell St. 51 S4� INITIATING ACTION: T`his order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of one {1) complaint, a petition with one (1J signer and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING COPIDITIOPIS: Tkiis walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches and cracked panels. ................................................................... ., : SUNIMARY OF ENGINEERIIVG RECO1V11VIE1VDATION Ward 7 a�-�.n� PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALB N.S. E. TF�RD ST. from Barclay St. to Ha2elwood St. & W.S. HAZELWOOD ST. from E. Third St. to Fremont Ave. at 1535 E. Third St. Oniy. a� f WV� INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of one {1) complaint, a petition with one {1) signer and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves and asphalt patches. ................................................................... Q�' 4'l� � CITY OF 3T. PAUL COUNCI � I E NO_ \\ ��l�l�_'��3-�i.: -- -- _ __ a 3 PRELIMINARY.ORDER - O R� G� NA L Voting�Ward98004 398005 Iu the Mattes o£ 598004 - Sidewalk reconstruction on both sides Goodrich Ave from S Fairview Ave to S Howell St 598005 - Sidewalk reconstruction on the north side of E Third St from Barclay St to Hazelwood St & the west side Hazelwood St from E Third St to Fremont Ave at 1535 E Third St only. *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (dne, two or three family structures} Reconstructioa (replacement o£ old sidewalk) -$7.65 per front foot for a £ive (5) foot wide walk and $9.18 per front toot for a six (6) foot wide walk. A11 other widths will be prorated accordingly. New coastruction (where no walk existed) - 100$ of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.42 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100g of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.62 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 3 Fi 3 That the said raport and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1998 Fublic Improvement Aid. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 27th day of May, 1998, at 5:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the city of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays ✓Benanav �lakey ✓$ostrom v�oleman �FTarri s �antry �Reiter ? 2n Favor G Against Adopted by Council: Date��1�q Y Certified Passed by Council Secretary BY� a � -->� tin Mayor CITY OF ST. PAUL FII3AL ORDER In the Matter oE courae ztis rro. �� .S� By ��' ''�/'_� 0 R� G I N A L Voting�Ward9804&7598005 598004 - Sidewalk reconstruction on both sides Goodrich Ave from S Fairview Ave to S Howell St 598005 - Sidewalk reconstruction on the north side of E Third St from Barclay St to Hazelwood St & the west side Hazelwood St from E Third St to Fremont Ave at 1535 E Third St only. *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of o1d sidewalkJ -$7.65 ger front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $9.18 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 1000 of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.42 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 £eet of new or reconstructecl sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.62 per square foot. under Preliminary order � c� — o� � ot approved ��_ 1\ �' The Council of the City of Saint Paul lias conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of 5aint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSOI3S Yeas � Nays ✓Benanav �akey sos trom — R-bs er�` �leman �rris �ntry Reiter � �bsev.� �In Favor �Against � (abs� Adopted by Council: Date_���� Certified Passed by Council Secretary or ___,..�a�s uaze – May 27, 1998 Works Sidewalks �:3�:3+Yk3 RE 3-20-98 qa �y�} EO GREEN SHEET No.�7� iNmnwnh --narrwm ------------____�—^ _ wswavervonar�uami4-8-98 Roun"� BUOGEfDiFECTOR in Council Research Office °� y 3-27-98 �bavoxzoanss�sn� ANRE PA(iES _ i —(CUP ALL IACA710NS PoR SIGWINRE� n ASSOCN7E Reconstsuct Sidewalk in Wards 4 8 7(See atiached tist) & MGT. SERVICES "�.OMMENDATIONS: AFprow iA) a p� (Kl pERSONAI SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLON7NG QUESTIONS: _ PWJNING WMMISSKX! _CNIL SEFVICE COMMISSION �. ��� P�SOn7�r NOef worked under a contrac[ tor U»is departm¢nt? Y C18 COMMnTEE 2. Nas this Person/Frm ever been a d/y empbyee? — — YES NO _ STaFF _ 3. Daes V�is personlfirm possess a ski11 not rwrmally possessed 6y any curtent city employee? DISTP7CTCOUNCIL YES NO PPORTS WH�GH COf1NCIL OBJECTNE? �P�a�� atl yas answars on saparate sheet and attach to green sheet ,71ATING PR08LEM, ISSUE.OPPOR'NNIN (NMO. W4iAT, WHEN, WHEqE, WH1�: The problem "defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, akernating freeRhaw cycles, service I'rfe limits, chemical add0ives, eMreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide level and must be addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk candition would worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusable and su6ject to increased pedestrian injuries from faiis and possible litigations. The c,ommunity wifl henefit from this project because it wiU provide safe detect free sidewa&s for its many citizens. The sidewalk contracts are executed by private contractors, so R follows that private sectar jobs are created as a resuft of this activiry. H+storically, the sidewaik reconstructions have created negative feedback in ihe area of construction procedure and assessment. Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the tact up to one-haif the assessment is City subsidized, ft stifi remains controversial. c+ tf -?? r,c.:. r. �fti".a ��1., �.y.� � ..,:,��. �'� ,' �..... .... '�, �. r�wTA This option would aifow the irrfrastructure ot sidewalk stock to detetiotate, which in turn, will generate more personal injury suits, uRimately resufting in the expenditure ofi larger dotlar amounts in eventual repairs andlor-repiacemeM, as wefl asclaim-payouts. WNDINGSWRCE FINANCIAL INFORMATION: :TION S G� j 1 j, Z6 -�M�0668 q; PtA 98 � n, Ha'1 = S�7�uvv c, crs 98 = 5o,aao C6STJREYENUE BUDGETED (CIRCLE ONE) ACINRY IiUMBEA �.. __. -.� _. q�-=4�t1 SLJMMARY OF E1�3GINEERII�SG RECOIv11V1ENDATION Ward 4 PROJECT• RECONSTRUCT SII?EWLiLK B.S. GOODRICH AVE. from S. Fairview Ave. to S. Howell St. 51 S4� INITIATING ACTION: T`his order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of one {1) complaint, a petition with one (1J signer and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING COPIDITIOPIS: Tkiis walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches and cracked panels. ................................................................... ., : SUNIMARY OF ENGINEERIIVG RECO1V11VIE1VDATION Ward 7 a�-�.n� PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALB N.S. E. TF�RD ST. from Barclay St. to Ha2elwood St. & W.S. HAZELWOOD ST. from E. Third St. to Fremont Ave. at 1535 E. Third St. Oniy. a� f WV� INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of one {1) complaint, a petition with one {1) signer and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves and asphalt patches. ................................................................... Q�' 4'l� � CITY OF 3T. PAUL COUNCI � I E NO_ \\ ��l�l�_'��3-�i.: -- -- _ __ a 3 PRELIMINARY.ORDER - O R� G� NA L Voting�Ward98004 398005 Iu the Mattes o£ 598004 - Sidewalk reconstruction on both sides Goodrich Ave from S Fairview Ave to S Howell St 598005 - Sidewalk reconstruction on the north side of E Third St from Barclay St to Hazelwood St & the west side Hazelwood St from E Third St to Fremont Ave at 1535 E Third St only. *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (dne, two or three family structures} Reconstructioa (replacement o£ old sidewalk) -$7.65 per front foot for a £ive (5) foot wide walk and $9.18 per front toot for a six (6) foot wide walk. A11 other widths will be prorated accordingly. New coastruction (where no walk existed) - 100$ of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.42 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100g of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.62 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 3 Fi 3 That the said raport and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1998 Fublic Improvement Aid. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 27th day of May, 1998, at 5:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the city of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays ✓Benanav �lakey ✓$ostrom v�oleman �FTarri s �antry �Reiter ? 2n Favor G Against Adopted by Council: Date��1�q Y Certified Passed by Council Secretary BY� a � -->� tin Mayor