The URL can be used to link to this page

98-470cxm� oa sm. aavi. F'INAL ORDER ORIGINA� In the Matter of Qp �_ � .. - �o� F LE NO. `l0 - 4Ro By f��(lij��12./ Fi No. 598001-598003 Voting Ward_6 598001 - Sidewalk reconstruction on both sides Hazelwood St from E Arlington Ave to E Nebraska Ave. 59F�vaa �°-�'n^,z"' - Sidewalk reconstruction on north side of E Idaho Ave from Birmingham St to Manton St. 50 S98003 - Sidewalk reconstruction on the west side of N White Bear Ave from Stillwater Ave to North 12 ft & the south side of Stillwater Ave from N White Bear Ave to West 50 ft at $77 N White Bear Ave only. q� "`�`�° *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstructioa (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.65 per front foot £or a five (5) foot wide walk and $9.18 per front foot for a six (6J foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. Nem canstruction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.42 per square foot. All corner residential properties wi11 receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property_ MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 10d% o£ actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.62 per square foot. under Preliminary The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City of£icers shall calculate all e�enses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. CQUNCILPERSONS YeaS Nays ✓ nanav Blakey Bostrom— f��r-}` ✓Coleman ✓Harr i s �ntry Reiter - 'Abse�r.�" Adopted by Council: Date_�iJ V ,� 50 Certified Passed by Council Secretary S In Favor Q Against cX p�S e r or Works Sidewalks r H. Lueth - BE ON COUNC'. .,ace - Mav 27. 1 RE 3-20-98 Q�•��.' GREEN SHEET No. 38574 u�mnwa� �inwaTe cm couNCn� _ � �� CI7VATT6RNEY LJCIiYCLEFK ��$-9$ � �� WDGETDIRECTOR FIN.&MGT.SEfiViCES Research Office � � MAYOR(OflASSiSTANi) � Counai F _ 1 _(Cl1P AlL LOCAlIONS FOR SfGNATUR� � ASSOCIAiE �TMENTAL A(X Recanstruct Sidewalk in Ward 6(See attached list) � StAFF SUPPOHTS WHICH CWNCIL OBJECTNE? ZJ PERSQNAL S COMRACiS YUST ANSWER 7HE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS: �� mu YES � NO � worked under a contract for this department? 2. Has his person�rm ever 6een a ci[y empioyee? YES NO S. Does tliis parsoNfirm porsess a skill not rwrmalty possessed 6y am/ wrrent ciry employea? YES NO Exp�ein ail yes answers on separata shaet and attaeh to grean shaet ITIATING P8�8LEM. ISSUE.OPPORNNITY (WHO, WH0.T, WHEN, wtfExE. WHV�: ' The problem "defective sidewalk" was creaied because af tree roots, deleterious su6grade material, alternating freelthaw cycles, service life limits, chemicai additives, eatreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide fevei and must be addressed and corrected on an annual basis. left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusable and subjec[ to inaeased pedestrian injwies from fafls and possibie IHigations. ADYPNTAGES IF The cammunity wili benefit from this project because it will provide safe detect free sidewalks for its many citizens. The sid�walk contracts are executed by private contractors, so ft follows that private sector jobs are eat��jM��ivity. �CStrj,�r�; !��s�, ,._ . ., �. ,�,r�1 OISPDVANTAGES IF APPROVFA: Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of procedure and assessment. Simp{y stated, property owners detesi assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it still remains controversial. This option would allow ihe infrastructure of sidewaik stock w deteriorate, which in turn, wiii generate more personal injury suits, uRimately resufting in the expendkure af larger dollar amounts in eventual repairs and/or replacement, as well as claim payouts. )TAL AMWNT OF TRANSACTION $ lNDINGSWFCE 9$^M'"O66S � COSTlREVENUE BUDGETEQ (CIHCLE ONE) YES No ACINITYNUMBEfi C�}H-�LT7S�-O�H�1-1J0000 JANCIAI INFORMATION: (EXPLAIN) B� AST = 325 �. crg 9$ ° 50 — -- -_ SL3MMARY OF ENGINEERING �2EC014IMENDATIONS Ward 6 __�� . PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALS B.S. HAZELWOOD ST. from E. Arlington Ave. to E. Nebraska Ave. rivITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works 5 (,�Q� � as public necessity on the basis of two (w) complaints and an inspection of the t v walk. EXISTIATG CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, settied and cracked panels. ................................................................... PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALS N.S. E. IDAHO AVE. from Birminghazn St. to Manton St. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works ��2 as public necessity on the basis of three (3) complaints, a petition with one (1) signer and an inspection of the watk. EXISTING COIYDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with asphalt patches, settled and cracked panels. ................................................................... PROJECT. FLECONSTRUCT SIDEWt1LH W.S. N. WHITE BEAR AVE. from Stillwater Ave. to N. 12' & S.S. STILLWATER AVE. from N. White Bear Ave. to W. 50' at 877 N. White Bear Ave. Only. �� INITIATING ACTION: as public necessity on walk. This order was initiated by the Birector of Public Works the basis of one (1) complaint and an inspection of the EXI3TING CONUITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with scaled and settled panels. -'- � CZTY OF ST. PAIIL ,_,.. Ia the Matter of ��'�� _ _- 0RlGlNAL °��CI -F LE- a � By L '�L"� File No. S98001-598003 Voting Ward 6 S98001 - Sidewalk reconstruction on both sides Hazelwood St from E � }q � n.y Arlington Ave to E Nebraska Ave. 5 I O�z(� £+983 - Sidewalk reconstruction on north side of E Idaho Ave from Birmingham St to Manton St. S98063 - Sidewalk reconstruction on the west side of N White Bear Ave from Stillwater Ave to North 12 ft & the south side of Stillwater Ave from N White Bear Ave to West 50 ft at 877 N White Bear Ave only. *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $9.18 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New coastruction twhere no walk existed) - 1�0� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.42 per square foot. All corner residential properties wi11 receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side^ of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.62 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1. 2 3 That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1995 Public Improvement Aid. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 27th day of May, 1998, at 5:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers o£ the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice o£ said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays ✓Benanav ✓f3lakey ./�ostrom �oleman ,iHarris ,�antry �Reiter '? 2n Favor �Against Adopted by Council: Date��`�`t�'� Certified Passed by Council Secretary BY��-�� _,_.J�,, � Mayor cxm� oa sm. aavi. F'INAL ORDER ORIGINA� In the Matter of Qp �_ � .. - �o� F LE NO. `l0 - 4Ro By f��(lij��12./ Fi No. 598001-598003 Voting Ward_6 598001 - Sidewalk reconstruction on both sides Hazelwood St from E Arlington Ave to E Nebraska Ave. 59F�vaa �°-�'n^,z"' - Sidewalk reconstruction on north side of E Idaho Ave from Birmingham St to Manton St. 50 S98003 - Sidewalk reconstruction on the west side of N White Bear Ave from Stillwater Ave to North 12 ft & the south side of Stillwater Ave from N White Bear Ave to West 50 ft at $77 N White Bear Ave only. q� "`�`�° *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstructioa (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.65 per front foot £or a five (5) foot wide walk and $9.18 per front foot for a six (6J foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. Nem canstruction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.42 per square foot. All corner residential properties wi11 receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property_ MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 10d% o£ actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.62 per square foot. under Preliminary The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City of£icers shall calculate all e�enses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. CQUNCILPERSONS YeaS Nays ✓ nanav Blakey Bostrom— f��r-}` ✓Coleman ✓Harr i s �ntry Reiter - 'Abse�r.�" Adopted by Council: Date_�iJ V ,� 50 Certified Passed by Council Secretary S In Favor Q Against cX p�S e r or Works Sidewalks r H. Lueth - BE ON COUNC'. .,ace - Mav 27. 1 RE 3-20-98 Q�•��.' GREEN SHEET No. 38574 u�mnwa� �inwaTe cm couNCn� _ � �� CI7VATT6RNEY LJCIiYCLEFK ��$-9$ � �� WDGETDIRECTOR FIN.&MGT.SEfiViCES Research Office � � MAYOR(OflASSiSTANi) � Counai F _ 1 _(Cl1P AlL LOCAlIONS FOR SfGNATUR� � ASSOCIAiE �TMENTAL A(X Recanstruct Sidewalk in Ward 6(See attached list) � StAFF SUPPOHTS WHICH CWNCIL OBJECTNE? ZJ PERSQNAL S COMRACiS YUST ANSWER 7HE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS: �� mu YES � NO � worked under a contract for this department? 2. Has his person�rm ever 6een a ci[y empioyee? YES NO S. Does tliis parsoNfirm porsess a skill not rwrmalty possessed 6y am/ wrrent ciry employea? YES NO Exp�ein ail yes answers on separata shaet and attaeh to grean shaet ITIATING P8�8LEM. ISSUE.OPPORNNITY (WHO, WH0.T, WHEN, wtfExE. WHV�: ' The problem "defective sidewalk" was creaied because af tree roots, deleterious su6grade material, alternating freelthaw cycles, service life limits, chemicai additives, eatreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide fevei and must be addressed and corrected on an annual basis. left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusable and subjec[ to inaeased pedestrian injwies from fafls and possibie IHigations. ADYPNTAGES IF The cammunity wili benefit from this project because it will provide safe detect free sidewalks for its many citizens. The sid�walk contracts are executed by private contractors, so ft follows that private sector jobs are eat��jM��ivity. �CStrj,�r�; !��s�, ,._ . ., �. ,�,r�1 OISPDVANTAGES IF APPROVFA: Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of procedure and assessment. Simp{y stated, property owners detesi assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it still remains controversial. This option would allow ihe infrastructure of sidewaik stock w deteriorate, which in turn, wiii generate more personal injury suits, uRimately resufting in the expendkure af larger dollar amounts in eventual repairs and/or replacement, as well as claim payouts. )TAL AMWNT OF TRANSACTION $ lNDINGSWFCE 9$^M'"O66S � COSTlREVENUE BUDGETEQ (CIHCLE ONE) YES No ACINITYNUMBEfi C�}H-�LT7S�-O�H�1-1J0000 JANCIAI INFORMATION: (EXPLAIN) B� AST = 325 �. crg 9$ ° 50 — -- -_ SL3MMARY OF ENGINEERING �2EC014IMENDATIONS Ward 6 __�� . PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALS B.S. HAZELWOOD ST. from E. Arlington Ave. to E. Nebraska Ave. rivITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works 5 (,�Q� � as public necessity on the basis of two (w) complaints and an inspection of the t v walk. EXISTIATG CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, settied and cracked panels. ................................................................... PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALS N.S. E. IDAHO AVE. from Birminghazn St. to Manton St. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works ��2 as public necessity on the basis of three (3) complaints, a petition with one (1) signer and an inspection of the watk. EXISTING COIYDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with asphalt patches, settled and cracked panels. ................................................................... PROJECT. FLECONSTRUCT SIDEWt1LH W.S. N. WHITE BEAR AVE. from Stillwater Ave. to N. 12' & S.S. STILLWATER AVE. from N. White Bear Ave. to W. 50' at 877 N. White Bear Ave. Only. �� INITIATING ACTION: as public necessity on walk. This order was initiated by the Birector of Public Works the basis of one (1) complaint and an inspection of the EXI3TING CONUITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with scaled and settled panels. -'- � CZTY OF ST. PAIIL ,_,.. Ia the Matter of ��'�� _ _- 0RlGlNAL °��CI -F LE- a � By L '�L"� File No. S98001-598003 Voting Ward 6 S98001 - Sidewalk reconstruction on both sides Hazelwood St from E � }q � n.y Arlington Ave to E Nebraska Ave. 5 I O�z(� £+983 - Sidewalk reconstruction on north side of E Idaho Ave from Birmingham St to Manton St. S98063 - Sidewalk reconstruction on the west side of N White Bear Ave from Stillwater Ave to North 12 ft & the south side of Stillwater Ave from N White Bear Ave to West 50 ft at 877 N White Bear Ave only. *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $9.18 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New coastruction twhere no walk existed) - 1�0� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.42 per square foot. All corner residential properties wi11 receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side^ of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.62 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1. 2 3 That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1995 Public Improvement Aid. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 27th day of May, 1998, at 5:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers o£ the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice o£ said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays ✓Benanav ✓f3lakey ./�ostrom �oleman ,iHarris ,�antry �Reiter '? 2n Favor �Against Adopted by Council: Date��`�`t�'� Certified Passed by Council Secretary BY��-�� _,_.J�,, � Mayor cxm� oa sm. aavi. F'INAL ORDER ORIGINA� In the Matter of Qp �_ � .. - �o� F LE NO. `l0 - 4Ro By f��(lij��12./ Fi No. 598001-598003 Voting Ward_6 598001 - Sidewalk reconstruction on both sides Hazelwood St from E Arlington Ave to E Nebraska Ave. 59F�vaa �°-�'n^,z"' - Sidewalk reconstruction on north side of E Idaho Ave from Birmingham St to Manton St. 50 S98003 - Sidewalk reconstruction on the west side of N White Bear Ave from Stillwater Ave to North 12 ft & the south side of Stillwater Ave from N White Bear Ave to West 50 ft at $77 N White Bear Ave only. q� "`�`�° *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstructioa (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.65 per front foot £or a five (5) foot wide walk and $9.18 per front foot for a six (6J foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. Nem canstruction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.42 per square foot. All corner residential properties wi11 receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property_ MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 10d% o£ actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.62 per square foot. under Preliminary The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City of£icers shall calculate all e�enses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. CQUNCILPERSONS YeaS Nays ✓ nanav Blakey Bostrom— f��r-}` ✓Coleman ✓Harr i s �ntry Reiter - 'Abse�r.�" Adopted by Council: Date_�iJ V ,� 50 Certified Passed by Council Secretary S In Favor Q Against cX p�S e r or Works Sidewalks r H. Lueth - BE ON COUNC'. .,ace - Mav 27. 1 RE 3-20-98 Q�•��.' GREEN SHEET No. 38574 u�mnwa� �inwaTe cm couNCn� _ � �� CI7VATT6RNEY LJCIiYCLEFK ��$-9$ � �� WDGETDIRECTOR FIN.&MGT.SEfiViCES Research Office � � MAYOR(OflASSiSTANi) � Counai F _ 1 _(Cl1P AlL LOCAlIONS FOR SfGNATUR� � ASSOCIAiE �TMENTAL A(X Recanstruct Sidewalk in Ward 6(See attached list) � StAFF SUPPOHTS WHICH CWNCIL OBJECTNE? ZJ PERSQNAL S COMRACiS YUST ANSWER 7HE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS: �� mu YES � NO � worked under a contract for this department? 2. Has his person�rm ever 6een a ci[y empioyee? YES NO S. Does tliis parsoNfirm porsess a skill not rwrmalty possessed 6y am/ wrrent ciry employea? YES NO Exp�ein ail yes answers on separata shaet and attaeh to grean shaet ITIATING P8�8LEM. ISSUE.OPPORNNITY (WHO, WH0.T, WHEN, wtfExE. WHV�: ' The problem "defective sidewalk" was creaied because af tree roots, deleterious su6grade material, alternating freelthaw cycles, service life limits, chemicai additives, eatreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide fevei and must be addressed and corrected on an annual basis. left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusable and subjec[ to inaeased pedestrian injwies from fafls and possibie IHigations. ADYPNTAGES IF The cammunity wili benefit from this project because it will provide safe detect free sidewalks for its many citizens. The sid�walk contracts are executed by private contractors, so ft follows that private sector jobs are eat��jM��ivity. �CStrj,�r�; !��s�, ,._ . ., �. ,�,r�1 OISPDVANTAGES IF APPROVFA: Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of procedure and assessment. Simp{y stated, property owners detesi assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it still remains controversial. This option would allow ihe infrastructure of sidewaik stock w deteriorate, which in turn, wiii generate more personal injury suits, uRimately resufting in the expendkure af larger dollar amounts in eventual repairs and/or replacement, as well as claim payouts. )TAL AMWNT OF TRANSACTION $ lNDINGSWFCE 9$^M'"O66S � COSTlREVENUE BUDGETEQ (CIHCLE ONE) YES No ACINITYNUMBEfi C�}H-�LT7S�-O�H�1-1J0000 JANCIAI INFORMATION: (EXPLAIN) B� AST = 325 �. crg 9$ ° 50 — -- -_ SL3MMARY OF ENGINEERING �2EC014IMENDATIONS Ward 6 __�� . PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALS B.S. HAZELWOOD ST. from E. Arlington Ave. to E. Nebraska Ave. rivITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works 5 (,�Q� � as public necessity on the basis of two (w) complaints and an inspection of the t v walk. EXISTIATG CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, settied and cracked panels. ................................................................... PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALS N.S. E. IDAHO AVE. from Birminghazn St. to Manton St. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works ��2 as public necessity on the basis of three (3) complaints, a petition with one (1) signer and an inspection of the watk. EXISTING COIYDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with asphalt patches, settled and cracked panels. ................................................................... PROJECT. FLECONSTRUCT SIDEWt1LH W.S. N. WHITE BEAR AVE. from Stillwater Ave. to N. 12' & S.S. STILLWATER AVE. from N. White Bear Ave. to W. 50' at 877 N. White Bear Ave. Only. �� INITIATING ACTION: as public necessity on walk. This order was initiated by the Birector of Public Works the basis of one (1) complaint and an inspection of the EXI3TING CONUITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with scaled and settled panels. -'- � CZTY OF ST. PAIIL ,_,.. Ia the Matter of ��'�� _ _- 0RlGlNAL °��CI -F LE- a � By L '�L"� File No. S98001-598003 Voting Ward 6 S98001 - Sidewalk reconstruction on both sides Hazelwood St from E � }q � n.y Arlington Ave to E Nebraska Ave. 5 I O�z(� £+983 - Sidewalk reconstruction on north side of E Idaho Ave from Birmingham St to Manton St. S98063 - Sidewalk reconstruction on the west side of N White Bear Ave from Stillwater Ave to North 12 ft & the south side of Stillwater Ave from N White Bear Ave to West 50 ft at 877 N White Bear Ave only. *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $9.18 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New coastruction twhere no walk existed) - 1�0� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.42 per square foot. All corner residential properties wi11 receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side^ of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.62 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1. 2 3 That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1995 Public Improvement Aid. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 27th day of May, 1998, at 5:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers o£ the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice o£ said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays ✓Benanav ✓f3lakey ./�ostrom �oleman ,iHarris ,�antry �Reiter '? 2n Favor �Against Adopted by Council: Date��`�`t�'� Certified Passed by Council Secretary BY��-�� _,_.J�,, � Mayor