The URL can be used to link to this page

97-979CITY OF ST. PAUL COUNCIL FILE NO_ ��=�1 l T !_'� Y � 1��2?�l�-' / i�d1�L�-% — 1 � � FINAL ORDER B File No. 597086-5 088 Voting Ward 4 In the Matter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following location(s): 597086 - West side of N Hamline Ave from W Arlington Ave to W Nebraska Ave 597087 - South side of W Nebraska Ave from N Hamline Ave to Sheldon St and the North side of W Nebraska Ave from N Hamline Ave to the west 128 feet to the a11ey 597088 - North side of Pearl St from Bayless Ave to Cromwell Ave and the East side of Cromwell Ave from Pearl St to North 40 feet *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTII�L RATES (One, two or three family structures) Raconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.45 per front £oot for a£ive (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. under Preliminary The Council above improvement Charter; and �� _ � �� o£ the City o£ Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the , due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas � Nays {ittlakey Bostrom — Abse,�'c �llins �rris �� ard vl�forton Thune _ A �.sev�'�"' � In Favor � Against �- Pbse�..�- Adopted by Council: Date'(�v� �,T t .� Certified Passed by Council Secretary By � c7 , � �- Mayor �"' Hearing Date — August 6, 1997 RE 5-30-97 qll —q� DEPAFTMEPfr/OFFICFJCOUNCIL DATEINITIATED GREEN SHEET (�NO.32249 Public Works Sidewalks 5'2�'97 INITIAUDATE INRIAL/DATE COMACTPEflSONBPHONE �DFPpRTMENTDIflECTOR ❑CITYCOUNCIL Robert A. Lissick - 266-612'I N u �� ❑ crrc arrorwev � CIIY CLERK MU5T8EONCOUNCIIAGENDABY(OA'f� 6 RWnNG ❑gppGETpIqECSOR �FIN.&MGT.SERVICESDIR. Must be in Council Research Office � MAYOR(�RASSISTNNT) t� Cou�l Research b noon Frida 6-6-97 ❑ TOTALlt OF SIGNANRE PAGES I _(CL1P ALL LOCA710N5 PDR 9GNRT6HE) � ASSOCIAiE NTCL DL:COLLNTANT ACTpN qEWES7ED �,��'�✓ Reconstruct Sidewalk in Ward 4(See attached list) c � 1.� ��l' - REWMMENDAi7oNS:Mw�(MaReiea( ) PERSONALSEfiVICECONTHACTSMUSTANSWEiiTHEFOLLOWING�UESTIONS: PUWNING COMMISSION CNIL $EFiVICE COMMISSbN 1. H2S ihiS On(bim eYe( Vrofketl uIMBf a OOntl3Ci fOf iflf5 deP3[bn¢fl[? — — �S No qB COMMIT7EE 2. Has this pe�soNfirm ever been a city employee? — — YES NO A SiAFF 3. Does this peisoNfirm possess a skilf not rrormaVly possessed by any cunent ciry — "� employce? DIS7NICiCOUNC�t/jo''L _ YES NO SUPPoRTS WH1CH COUNCIL Od,IECTPIE? �P�n all yes answers on separete sheet and aHach to gteen sheet INfT1ATING PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPOfliUNITY (WHO, WHAT, WHEN, WHERE. WH'�: The problem "defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, afternating freefthaw cycles, service I'rfe �imits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide level and must be addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible fitigations. ADVANTAGES IF APPROVED: The community witt benefit trom this project because ft will provide safe detect tree sidewalks fos its many citizens. The sidewalk conVacts are executed by private contractors, so it follows that private sector jobs are created as a resuft of this activity. DISADVANTAGES IF APPflOVED: Historicalty, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment. Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it still remains controversial. �� tlVi#if�� I�ti�ae...i�i! yr`i.:�..�'�.d''� �� Y N QJV�A DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED: This option would ailow the iMrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in tum, will gen'erate"m`ore peisonalinj ry suits, uHimately resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in eventual repairs and/or replacement, as well as claim payouts. TOTALAMWNTOFTRANSAC[pNS �3�O,�Z j$ COSTlREYENUEBUDGETED(CIRCLEONE� YES NO FlJNDWGSWHCE �]^PJ^OFC7] A PtA g7 =. 557.0(l0 ACRYITYNUlA6ER - FINANCIALINFORMATION:(EXPLAIN) S' AST p 3QQ�OQO C, C�6 g7 = 50�a00 SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATIONS Ward 4 J��o�� q�-��q PROJECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALH W.S. N. HAMLINE AVE. frOm W. Arlington Ave. to W, Nebraska Ave. ' I1vITIATING ACTIOAi: T1iis order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of 8ve (5) compiaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, setfled and cracked panels. ................................................................... PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALH S.S. W. NEBRASKA AVE. from N. Hamline Ave. tfl Sheldon St. & N.S. W. IVEBRASKA AVE. from N. Hamiine Ave. W. 128' to Alley. � �9�0$� IPIITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of two (2} complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches and scaled paneis. ................................................................... PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALH N.S. PEARL ST. from Bayless Ave. to Cramwell Ave. & E.S. CROMWELL AVE. from Pearl St. to N. 4Q'. �/�$� INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as gublic necessity on the basis of a petition with one {1) signer and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves and asphalt patches. ................................................................... °�� -q�� CITY OF ST. PAUL PREI,IMINARY ORIIBR COUNCIL FILE NO. " �� ay `� File No. 597086-597 88 Voting Ward_4 In tha Matter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following location(s): 597086 - West side of N Hamline Ave from W Arlington Ave to W Nebraska Ave 597087 - South side of W Nebraska Ave from N Hamline Ave to Sheldon St and the North side of W Nebraska Ave from N Hamline Ave to the west 128 feet to the alley 597088 - North side of Pear1 St from Bayless Ave to Cromwell Ave and the East side of Cromwell Ave from Pearl St to North 40 feet *E5TIMATED CONSTRi3CTION RATES RE5IDENTIAL RAfiES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.45 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construotion (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MiTLTI-RESIDSNTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. The Council o£ the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 3 fa 3 That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estima.ted cost thereof is *5EE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1997 Public Improvement Aid. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 6th day of August, 1997, at 4:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of 5aint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays V Blakey i /Bostxom ,/Eollins ✓F�arri s Megard — �h� �Morton ✓Prhune �In Favor � Against � '�bSe-�'��' Adopted by Council: Date �_� �`�°�� Certified Passed by Council Secretary By� �--�,_ .. Mayor CITY OF ST. PAUL COUNCIL FILE NO_ ��=�1 l T !_'� Y � 1��2?�l�-' / i�d1�L�-% — 1 � � FINAL ORDER B File No. 597086-5 088 Voting Ward 4 In the Matter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following location(s): 597086 - West side of N Hamline Ave from W Arlington Ave to W Nebraska Ave 597087 - South side of W Nebraska Ave from N Hamline Ave to Sheldon St and the North side of W Nebraska Ave from N Hamline Ave to the west 128 feet to the a11ey 597088 - North side of Pearl St from Bayless Ave to Cromwell Ave and the East side of Cromwell Ave from Pearl St to North 40 feet *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTII�L RATES (One, two or three family structures) Raconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.45 per front £oot for a£ive (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. under Preliminary The Council above improvement Charter; and �� _ � �� o£ the City o£ Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the , due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas � Nays {ittlakey Bostrom — Abse,�'c �llins �rris �� ard vl�forton Thune _ A �.sev�'�"' � In Favor � Against �- Pbse�..�- Adopted by Council: Date'(�v� �,T t .� Certified Passed by Council Secretary By � c7 , � �- Mayor �"' Hearing Date — August 6, 1997 RE 5-30-97 qll —q� DEPAFTMEPfr/OFFICFJCOUNCIL DATEINITIATED GREEN SHEET (�NO.32249 Public Works Sidewalks 5'2�'97 INITIAUDATE INRIAL/DATE COMACTPEflSONBPHONE �DFPpRTMENTDIflECTOR ❑CITYCOUNCIL Robert A. Lissick - 266-612'I N u �� ❑ crrc arrorwev � CIIY CLERK MU5T8EONCOUNCIIAGENDABY(OA'f� 6 RWnNG ❑gppGETpIqECSOR �FIN.&MGT.SERVICESDIR. Must be in Council Research Office � MAYOR(�RASSISTNNT) t� Cou�l Research b noon Frida 6-6-97 ❑ TOTALlt OF SIGNANRE PAGES I _(CL1P ALL LOCA710N5 PDR 9GNRT6HE) � ASSOCIAiE NTCL DL:COLLNTANT ACTpN qEWES7ED �,��'�✓ Reconstruct Sidewalk in Ward 4(See attached list) c � 1.� ��l' - REWMMENDAi7oNS:Mw�(MaReiea( ) PERSONALSEfiVICECONTHACTSMUSTANSWEiiTHEFOLLOWING�UESTIONS: PUWNING COMMISSION CNIL $EFiVICE COMMISSbN 1. H2S ihiS On(bim eYe( Vrofketl uIMBf a OOntl3Ci fOf iflf5 deP3[bn¢fl[? — — �S No qB COMMIT7EE 2. Has this pe�soNfirm ever been a city employee? — — YES NO A SiAFF 3. Does this peisoNfirm possess a skilf not rrormaVly possessed by any cunent ciry — "� employce? DIS7NICiCOUNC�t/jo''L _ YES NO SUPPoRTS WH1CH COUNCIL Od,IECTPIE? �P�n all yes answers on separete sheet and aHach to gteen sheet INfT1ATING PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPOfliUNITY (WHO, WHAT, WHEN, WHERE. WH'�: The problem "defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, afternating freefthaw cycles, service I'rfe �imits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide level and must be addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible fitigations. ADVANTAGES IF APPROVED: The community witt benefit trom this project because ft will provide safe detect tree sidewalks fos its many citizens. The sidewalk conVacts are executed by private contractors, so it follows that private sector jobs are created as a resuft of this activity. DISADVANTAGES IF APPflOVED: Historicalty, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment. Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it still remains controversial. �� tlVi#if�� I�ti�ae...i�i! yr`i.:�..�'�.d''� �� Y N QJV�A DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED: This option would ailow the iMrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in tum, will gen'erate"m`ore peisonalinj ry suits, uHimately resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in eventual repairs and/or replacement, as well as claim payouts. TOTALAMWNTOFTRANSAC[pNS �3�O,�Z j$ COSTlREYENUEBUDGETED(CIRCLEONE� YES NO FlJNDWGSWHCE �]^PJ^OFC7] A PtA g7 =. 557.0(l0 ACRYITYNUlA6ER - FINANCIALINFORMATION:(EXPLAIN) S' AST p 3QQ�OQO C, C�6 g7 = 50�a00 SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATIONS Ward 4 J��o�� q�-��q PROJECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALH W.S. N. HAMLINE AVE. frOm W. Arlington Ave. to W, Nebraska Ave. ' I1vITIATING ACTIOAi: T1iis order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of 8ve (5) compiaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, setfled and cracked panels. ................................................................... PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALH S.S. W. NEBRASKA AVE. from N. Hamline Ave. tfl Sheldon St. & N.S. W. IVEBRASKA AVE. from N. Hamiine Ave. W. 128' to Alley. � �9�0$� IPIITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of two (2} complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches and scaled paneis. ................................................................... PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALH N.S. PEARL ST. from Bayless Ave. to Cramwell Ave. & E.S. CROMWELL AVE. from Pearl St. to N. 4Q'. �/�$� INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as gublic necessity on the basis of a petition with one {1) signer and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves and asphalt patches. ................................................................... °�� -q�� CITY OF ST. PAUL PREI,IMINARY ORIIBR COUNCIL FILE NO. " �� ay `� File No. 597086-597 88 Voting Ward_4 In tha Matter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following location(s): 597086 - West side of N Hamline Ave from W Arlington Ave to W Nebraska Ave 597087 - South side of W Nebraska Ave from N Hamline Ave to Sheldon St and the North side of W Nebraska Ave from N Hamline Ave to the west 128 feet to the alley 597088 - North side of Pear1 St from Bayless Ave to Cromwell Ave and the East side of Cromwell Ave from Pearl St to North 40 feet *E5TIMATED CONSTRi3CTION RATES RE5IDENTIAL RAfiES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.45 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construotion (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MiTLTI-RESIDSNTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. The Council o£ the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 3 fa 3 That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estima.ted cost thereof is *5EE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1997 Public Improvement Aid. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 6th day of August, 1997, at 4:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of 5aint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays V Blakey i /Bostxom ,/Eollins ✓F�arri s Megard — �h� �Morton ✓Prhune �In Favor � Against � '�bSe-�'��' Adopted by Council: Date �_� �`�°�� Certified Passed by Council Secretary By� �--�,_ .. Mayor CITY OF ST. PAUL COUNCIL FILE NO_ ��=�1 l T !_'� Y � 1��2?�l�-' / i�d1�L�-% — 1 � � FINAL ORDER B File No. 597086-5 088 Voting Ward 4 In the Matter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following location(s): 597086 - West side of N Hamline Ave from W Arlington Ave to W Nebraska Ave 597087 - South side of W Nebraska Ave from N Hamline Ave to Sheldon St and the North side of W Nebraska Ave from N Hamline Ave to the west 128 feet to the a11ey 597088 - North side of Pearl St from Bayless Ave to Cromwell Ave and the East side of Cromwell Ave from Pearl St to North 40 feet *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTII�L RATES (One, two or three family structures) Raconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.45 per front £oot for a£ive (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. under Preliminary The Council above improvement Charter; and �� _ � �� o£ the City o£ Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the , due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas � Nays {ittlakey Bostrom — Abse,�'c �llins �rris �� ard vl�forton Thune _ A �.sev�'�"' � In Favor � Against �- Pbse�..�- Adopted by Council: Date'(�v� �,T t .� Certified Passed by Council Secretary By � c7 , � �- Mayor �"' Hearing Date — August 6, 1997 RE 5-30-97 qll —q� DEPAFTMEPfr/OFFICFJCOUNCIL DATEINITIATED GREEN SHEET (�NO.32249 Public Works Sidewalks 5'2�'97 INITIAUDATE INRIAL/DATE COMACTPEflSONBPHONE �DFPpRTMENTDIflECTOR ❑CITYCOUNCIL Robert A. Lissick - 266-612'I N u �� ❑ crrc arrorwev � CIIY CLERK MU5T8EONCOUNCIIAGENDABY(OA'f� 6 RWnNG ❑gppGETpIqECSOR �FIN.&MGT.SERVICESDIR. Must be in Council Research Office � MAYOR(�RASSISTNNT) t� Cou�l Research b noon Frida 6-6-97 ❑ TOTALlt OF SIGNANRE PAGES I _(CL1P ALL LOCA710N5 PDR 9GNRT6HE) � ASSOCIAiE NTCL DL:COLLNTANT ACTpN qEWES7ED �,��'�✓ Reconstruct Sidewalk in Ward 4(See attached list) c � 1.� ��l' - REWMMENDAi7oNS:Mw�(MaReiea( ) PERSONALSEfiVICECONTHACTSMUSTANSWEiiTHEFOLLOWING�UESTIONS: PUWNING COMMISSION CNIL $EFiVICE COMMISSbN 1. H2S ihiS On(bim eYe( Vrofketl uIMBf a OOntl3Ci fOf iflf5 deP3[bn¢fl[? — — �S No qB COMMIT7EE 2. Has this pe�soNfirm ever been a city employee? — — YES NO A SiAFF 3. Does this peisoNfirm possess a skilf not rrormaVly possessed by any cunent ciry — "� employce? DIS7NICiCOUNC�t/jo''L _ YES NO SUPPoRTS WH1CH COUNCIL Od,IECTPIE? �P�n all yes answers on separete sheet and aHach to gteen sheet INfT1ATING PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPOfliUNITY (WHO, WHAT, WHEN, WHERE. WH'�: The problem "defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, afternating freefthaw cycles, service I'rfe �imits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide level and must be addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible fitigations. ADVANTAGES IF APPROVED: The community witt benefit trom this project because ft will provide safe detect tree sidewalks fos its many citizens. The sidewalk conVacts are executed by private contractors, so it follows that private sector jobs are created as a resuft of this activity. DISADVANTAGES IF APPflOVED: Historicalty, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment. Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it still remains controversial. �� tlVi#if�� I�ti�ae...i�i! yr`i.:�..�'�.d''� �� Y N QJV�A DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED: This option would ailow the iMrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in tum, will gen'erate"m`ore peisonalinj ry suits, uHimately resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in eventual repairs and/or replacement, as well as claim payouts. TOTALAMWNTOFTRANSAC[pNS �3�O,�Z j$ COSTlREYENUEBUDGETED(CIRCLEONE� YES NO FlJNDWGSWHCE �]^PJ^OFC7] A PtA g7 =. 557.0(l0 ACRYITYNUlA6ER - FINANCIALINFORMATION:(EXPLAIN) S' AST p 3QQ�OQO C, C�6 g7 = 50�a00 SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATIONS Ward 4 J��o�� q�-��q PROJECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALH W.S. N. HAMLINE AVE. frOm W. Arlington Ave. to W, Nebraska Ave. ' I1vITIATING ACTIOAi: T1iis order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of 8ve (5) compiaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, setfled and cracked panels. ................................................................... PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALH S.S. W. NEBRASKA AVE. from N. Hamline Ave. tfl Sheldon St. & N.S. W. IVEBRASKA AVE. from N. Hamiine Ave. W. 128' to Alley. � �9�0$� IPIITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of two (2} complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches and scaled paneis. ................................................................... PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALH N.S. PEARL ST. from Bayless Ave. to Cramwell Ave. & E.S. CROMWELL AVE. from Pearl St. to N. 4Q'. �/�$� INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as gublic necessity on the basis of a petition with one {1) signer and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves and asphalt patches. ................................................................... °�� -q�� CITY OF ST. PAUL PREI,IMINARY ORIIBR COUNCIL FILE NO. " �� ay `� File No. 597086-597 88 Voting Ward_4 In tha Matter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following location(s): 597086 - West side of N Hamline Ave from W Arlington Ave to W Nebraska Ave 597087 - South side of W Nebraska Ave from N Hamline Ave to Sheldon St and the North side of W Nebraska Ave from N Hamline Ave to the west 128 feet to the alley 597088 - North side of Pear1 St from Bayless Ave to Cromwell Ave and the East side of Cromwell Ave from Pearl St to North 40 feet *E5TIMATED CONSTRi3CTION RATES RE5IDENTIAL RAfiES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.45 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construotion (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MiTLTI-RESIDSNTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. The Council o£ the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 3 fa 3 That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estima.ted cost thereof is *5EE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1997 Public Improvement Aid. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 6th day of August, 1997, at 4:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of 5aint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays V Blakey i /Bostxom ,/Eollins ✓F�arri s Megard — �h� �Morton ✓Prhune �In Favor � Against � '�bSe-�'��' Adopted by Council: Date �_� �`�°�� Certified Passed by Council Secretary By� �--�,_ .. Mayor