The URL can be used to link to this page

97-978CITY OF ST. PAUL FINAL ORDER Vot q�� 597082-�97'C185 Ward 3 Ia the Matter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following location(s)_ 597082 - East side of Edgcumbe Rd from Juliet Ave to Palace Ave. � r, 597083 - Both sides of S Howell St from Palace Ave to James Ave_ S970S4 - Idorth side of James Ave from S Fairview Ave to S Howell Ave_ -^ � a v�,-- f-o �}} u . 3 1 R 9 597085 - Both sides Sumner St from Bayard Ave to Eleanor Ave. � �_ `� � ° 1 *ESTIMATED CON5TRL3CTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.45 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot £or a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 1�� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" af the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100$ of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. under Preliminary order �� — 1 c J c J approved � 11 �� The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposeci improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City o£ Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all e�enses incurred [herein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COt3NCILPERSONS Yeas � Nays V7�lakey } Bostrom - ��c� �11 ins ✓�'arri s Ie9ard �/LLOrton Thune - {��Sey�'} �}�'te�n��d `�1�J��° By � In Favor � Against a ��SeY�� Adopted by Council: Date_ V / Certified Passed by Council Secretary By `�_ � < � irt�n .. � _ .,, d � `� - -- Mayor ° Hearing Date - Au ust 6, 1997 RE 5-30-97 �=�-_��- OEPARiMENLOFFICFICOUNCIL DATEINITIATED GREEN SHEET No. 32248 Public Works Sidewalks 541-97 �winauoAr� wrcuw COMACTPERSONBPHONE �pEpqpTNENTOl0.EC70R �CIT�'COUNGII — / RobertA.Lissick-266-6121 ��N cmnrroar+Er �CRVCLERK xuMSra wn MUSTBEONCOUNCILAGENDABV(DATEJ6_18_(� ROUTING g�JpGE7DIREC70R �FIN.BMGT.SERVICESOIfl. Must be in Council Research Office � � MAVOR(OflAS51STMfi) 70 Council Research b noon Frida 6-6-97 � T�'CAL1tOF31GNANREPAGEB 1 __ SCUPALLLOCAIIONSFORSIGNATUHE) �ASSOCIAiE PAR7MENTALACCAUNTANT ACTIOtJREOl1ESTED � aa Reconstnsct Sidewa4k in Wacd 3(See attached list) � �5 � 7 �._ FiECOMMENDATIONS: Mpo�e (A1 w Pejea (F� pEpSpNAL SERVECE CONTRACTS MU3T ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS: PLl�NNING WMMISSION CNIL SEFVICE WMMtSSION 1. Has tliispers on/firm ever worked under a contracC for tliis deparUnent? — — YES NO _qB COMMfiTEE _ z. Ha5 ifiS Perso� NO er been a ciry employee? YE$ A S7aFF 3. Dces this persontFirm possess a skill not rwrtnaNy possessed by a�y curre�t ciry — employee? _DISTFICTCWNCIL��S _ YES NO SUPPORTS WHIGH COUNCIL ECTNEI �P�in all yas answars on saparate sheet and atfach to green shaet 1N7 T PflOBLEM.75SUE.OPPORTUNIIY �WHO.YAiAS,Y�riEN, WHERE, WHVy: The problem "defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, akernating freerthaw cycles, service 1'rfe limits, chemical add8ives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide level and must be addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusabie and subject io increased pedesirian injuries from falfs and possible litigations. ADVANSAGESIFAPPROVED: The commundy will benefit from this project because it will provide safe detect free sidewalks for its many citizens. The sidewalk contracts are executed by private contractors, so it follows that private sector jobs are created as a result of this activity. DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED: Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment. Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half ihe assessment is City subsidized, it stifl remains controversial. �i�taa�F �" ' ��m<.�.�z�:; �e:?��;; Ja�r� �� p�J� DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED: This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in furn, wiff generate-more persona1 injury sufls, uftimately resuking in the expenditure of iarger doilar amounts in everitual repairs and/or repfacement, as wefl as claim payouts. TOTAL AMIX1M OFTFIANSACTION 5 ]� q7 S��i COST/HEVENUE BUDGETED (CIRCLE ONE) YES No FUNDINGSWRCE 9]�+,M�OOb� A.� PFA 9� = SS��QOO AC(TVITYNUMBER G9��2T 2�0 Hj}-2 O12 FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (EXPLAIN) B A$'�' : 3QQ � OQO C, Ct$ 97 = 50,000 �,�•��—_ SUNIMARY OF ENGINEERING RECONIMENDATIONS � � _�r1 �- Ward 3 PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWAI.K E.S. EDCUMBE RD. from Juliet Ave. to Palace Ave. ;Q�Q � I1�ITTATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public ' 1 u Works as public necessity on the basis of four (4) complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with heaves, asghalt patches, setfled and cracked panels. ................................................................... 79?0�3 � ` �� PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. S. HOWELL ST. from Palace Ave. to Jaznes Ave: I1vITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, scaled, settled and cracked panels. PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWAI,H N.S. JAMES AVE. from S. Fairview Ave. to S. Howell St. IIVITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of two (2) complaints, a petition with one (1) signer and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, disintegrated, scaled, settled and cracked panels. ................................................................... PROJECT: RECON5TRUCT SIDEWALg B.S. SUMNER S1: from Bayard Ave. to Eleanor Ave. �g,o$�j IIVITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with scaled, setfled and cracked panels. ................................................................... CITY OF ST. P?�UL PRELIMINARY ORDER > �1'� - �rt � COUN Z F E NO �� By � File No._597082-597085 Voting Ward_3 In the Matter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following location(s): 597082 - East side of Edgcumbe Rd from Juliet Ave to Palace Ave_ 597083 - Both sides of S Fiowell St from Palace Ave to James Ave. 597084 - North side of James Ave from S Fairview Ave to S Howell Ave. S97085 - Both sides Sumner St from Bayard Ave to Eleanor Ave. *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.45 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New constxuction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1 E 3 That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1997 Public Improvement Aid. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 6th day of August, 1997, at 4:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays ✓Blakey �strom 1/C�ol l ins �fi'arris �Megard �rton �hune 2 2n Favor v Against Adopted by Council: Date�� t� Certified Passed by Council Secretary By �..._ c�-. Mayor CITY OF ST. PAUL FINAL ORDER Vot q�� 597082-�97'C185 Ward 3 Ia the Matter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following location(s)_ 597082 - East side of Edgcumbe Rd from Juliet Ave to Palace Ave. � r, 597083 - Both sides of S Howell St from Palace Ave to James Ave_ S970S4 - Idorth side of James Ave from S Fairview Ave to S Howell Ave_ -^ � a v�,-- f-o �}} u . 3 1 R 9 597085 - Both sides Sumner St from Bayard Ave to Eleanor Ave. � �_ `� � ° 1 *ESTIMATED CON5TRL3CTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.45 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot £or a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 1�� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" af the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100$ of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. under Preliminary order �� — 1 c J c J approved � 11 �� The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposeci improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City o£ Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all e�enses incurred [herein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COt3NCILPERSONS Yeas � Nays V7�lakey } Bostrom - ��c� �11 ins ✓�'arri s Ie9ard �/LLOrton Thune - {��Sey�'} �}�'te�n��d `�1�J��° By � In Favor � Against a ��SeY�� Adopted by Council: Date_ V / Certified Passed by Council Secretary By `�_ � < � irt�n .. � _ .,, d � `� - -- Mayor ° Hearing Date - Au ust 6, 1997 RE 5-30-97 �=�-_��- OEPARiMENLOFFICFICOUNCIL DATEINITIATED GREEN SHEET No. 32248 Public Works Sidewalks 541-97 �winauoAr� wrcuw COMACTPERSONBPHONE �pEpqpTNENTOl0.EC70R �CIT�'COUNGII — / RobertA.Lissick-266-6121 ��N cmnrroar+Er �CRVCLERK xuMSra wn MUSTBEONCOUNCILAGENDABV(DATEJ6_18_(� ROUTING g�JpGE7DIREC70R �FIN.BMGT.SERVICESOIfl. Must be in Council Research Office � � MAVOR(OflAS51STMfi) 70 Council Research b noon Frida 6-6-97 � T�'CAL1tOF31GNANREPAGEB 1 __ SCUPALLLOCAIIONSFORSIGNATUHE) �ASSOCIAiE PAR7MENTALACCAUNTANT ACTIOtJREOl1ESTED � aa Reconstnsct Sidewa4k in Wacd 3(See attached list) � �5 � 7 �._ FiECOMMENDATIONS: Mpo�e (A1 w Pejea (F� pEpSpNAL SERVECE CONTRACTS MU3T ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS: PLl�NNING WMMISSION CNIL SEFVICE WMMtSSION 1. Has tliispers on/firm ever worked under a contracC for tliis deparUnent? — — YES NO _qB COMMfiTEE _ z. Ha5 ifiS Perso� NO er been a ciry employee? YE$ A S7aFF 3. Dces this persontFirm possess a skill not rwrtnaNy possessed by a�y curre�t ciry — employee? _DISTFICTCWNCIL��S _ YES NO SUPPORTS WHIGH COUNCIL ECTNEI �P�in all yas answars on saparate sheet and atfach to green shaet 1N7 T PflOBLEM.75SUE.OPPORTUNIIY �WHO.YAiAS,Y�riEN, WHERE, WHVy: The problem "defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, akernating freerthaw cycles, service 1'rfe limits, chemical add8ives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide level and must be addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusabie and subject io increased pedesirian injuries from falfs and possible litigations. ADVANSAGESIFAPPROVED: The commundy will benefit from this project because it will provide safe detect free sidewalks for its many citizens. The sidewalk contracts are executed by private contractors, so it follows that private sector jobs are created as a result of this activity. DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED: Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment. Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half ihe assessment is City subsidized, it stifl remains controversial. �i�taa�F �" ' ��m<.�.�z�:; �e:?��;; Ja�r� �� p�J� DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED: This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in furn, wiff generate-more persona1 injury sufls, uftimately resuking in the expenditure of iarger doilar amounts in everitual repairs and/or repfacement, as wefl as claim payouts. TOTAL AMIX1M OFTFIANSACTION 5 ]� q7 S��i COST/HEVENUE BUDGETED (CIRCLE ONE) YES No FUNDINGSWRCE 9]�+,M�OOb� A.� PFA 9� = SS��QOO AC(TVITYNUMBER G9��2T 2�0 Hj}-2 O12 FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (EXPLAIN) B A$'�' : 3QQ � OQO C, Ct$ 97 = 50,000 �,�•��—_ SUNIMARY OF ENGINEERING RECONIMENDATIONS � � _�r1 �- Ward 3 PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWAI.K E.S. EDCUMBE RD. from Juliet Ave. to Palace Ave. ;Q�Q � I1�ITTATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public ' 1 u Works as public necessity on the basis of four (4) complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with heaves, asghalt patches, setfled and cracked panels. ................................................................... 79?0�3 � ` �� PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. S. HOWELL ST. from Palace Ave. to Jaznes Ave: I1vITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, scaled, settled and cracked panels. PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWAI,H N.S. JAMES AVE. from S. Fairview Ave. to S. Howell St. IIVITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of two (2) complaints, a petition with one (1) signer and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, disintegrated, scaled, settled and cracked panels. ................................................................... PROJECT: RECON5TRUCT SIDEWALg B.S. SUMNER S1: from Bayard Ave. to Eleanor Ave. �g,o$�j IIVITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with scaled, setfled and cracked panels. ................................................................... CITY OF ST. P?�UL PRELIMINARY ORDER > �1'� - �rt � COUN Z F E NO �� By � File No._597082-597085 Voting Ward_3 In the Matter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following location(s): 597082 - East side of Edgcumbe Rd from Juliet Ave to Palace Ave_ 597083 - Both sides of S Fiowell St from Palace Ave to James Ave. 597084 - North side of James Ave from S Fairview Ave to S Howell Ave. S97085 - Both sides Sumner St from Bayard Ave to Eleanor Ave. *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.45 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New constxuction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1 E 3 That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1997 Public Improvement Aid. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 6th day of August, 1997, at 4:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays ✓Blakey �strom 1/C�ol l ins �fi'arris �Megard �rton �hune 2 2n Favor v Against Adopted by Council: Date�� t� Certified Passed by Council Secretary By �..._ c�-. Mayor CITY OF ST. PAUL FINAL ORDER Vot q�� 597082-�97'C185 Ward 3 Ia the Matter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following location(s)_ 597082 - East side of Edgcumbe Rd from Juliet Ave to Palace Ave. � r, 597083 - Both sides of S Howell St from Palace Ave to James Ave_ S970S4 - Idorth side of James Ave from S Fairview Ave to S Howell Ave_ -^ � a v�,-- f-o �}} u . 3 1 R 9 597085 - Both sides Sumner St from Bayard Ave to Eleanor Ave. � �_ `� � ° 1 *ESTIMATED CON5TRL3CTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.45 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot £or a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 1�� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" af the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100$ of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. under Preliminary order �� — 1 c J c J approved � 11 �� The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposeci improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City o£ Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all e�enses incurred [herein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COt3NCILPERSONS Yeas � Nays V7�lakey } Bostrom - ��c� �11 ins ✓�'arri s Ie9ard �/LLOrton Thune - {��Sey�'} �}�'te�n��d `�1�J��° By � In Favor � Against a ��SeY�� Adopted by Council: Date_ V / Certified Passed by Council Secretary By `�_ � < � irt�n .. � _ .,, d � `� - -- Mayor ° Hearing Date - Au ust 6, 1997 RE 5-30-97 �=�-_��- OEPARiMENLOFFICFICOUNCIL DATEINITIATED GREEN SHEET No. 32248 Public Works Sidewalks 541-97 �winauoAr� wrcuw COMACTPERSONBPHONE �pEpqpTNENTOl0.EC70R �CIT�'COUNGII — / RobertA.Lissick-266-6121 ��N cmnrroar+Er �CRVCLERK xuMSra wn MUSTBEONCOUNCILAGENDABV(DATEJ6_18_(� ROUTING g�JpGE7DIREC70R �FIN.BMGT.SERVICESOIfl. Must be in Council Research Office � � MAVOR(OflAS51STMfi) 70 Council Research b noon Frida 6-6-97 � T�'CAL1tOF31GNANREPAGEB 1 __ SCUPALLLOCAIIONSFORSIGNATUHE) �ASSOCIAiE PAR7MENTALACCAUNTANT ACTIOtJREOl1ESTED � aa Reconstnsct Sidewa4k in Wacd 3(See attached list) � �5 � 7 �._ FiECOMMENDATIONS: Mpo�e (A1 w Pejea (F� pEpSpNAL SERVECE CONTRACTS MU3T ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS: PLl�NNING WMMISSION CNIL SEFVICE WMMtSSION 1. Has tliispers on/firm ever worked under a contracC for tliis deparUnent? — — YES NO _qB COMMfiTEE _ z. Ha5 ifiS Perso� NO er been a ciry employee? YE$ A S7aFF 3. Dces this persontFirm possess a skill not rwrtnaNy possessed by a�y curre�t ciry — employee? _DISTFICTCWNCIL��S _ YES NO SUPPORTS WHIGH COUNCIL ECTNEI �P�in all yas answars on saparate sheet and atfach to green shaet 1N7 T PflOBLEM.75SUE.OPPORTUNIIY �WHO.YAiAS,Y�riEN, WHERE, WHVy: The problem "defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, akernating freerthaw cycles, service 1'rfe limits, chemical add8ives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide level and must be addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusabie and subject io increased pedesirian injuries from falfs and possible litigations. ADVANSAGESIFAPPROVED: The commundy will benefit from this project because it will provide safe detect free sidewalks for its many citizens. The sidewalk contracts are executed by private contractors, so it follows that private sector jobs are created as a result of this activity. DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED: Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment. Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half ihe assessment is City subsidized, it stifl remains controversial. �i�taa�F �" ' ��m<.�.�z�:; �e:?��;; Ja�r� �� p�J� DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED: This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in furn, wiff generate-more persona1 injury sufls, uftimately resuking in the expenditure of iarger doilar amounts in everitual repairs and/or repfacement, as wefl as claim payouts. TOTAL AMIX1M OFTFIANSACTION 5 ]� q7 S��i COST/HEVENUE BUDGETED (CIRCLE ONE) YES No FUNDINGSWRCE 9]�+,M�OOb� A.� PFA 9� = SS��QOO AC(TVITYNUMBER G9��2T 2�0 Hj}-2 O12 FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (EXPLAIN) B A$'�' : 3QQ � OQO C, Ct$ 97 = 50,000 �,�•��—_ SUNIMARY OF ENGINEERING RECONIMENDATIONS � � _�r1 �- Ward 3 PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWAI.K E.S. EDCUMBE RD. from Juliet Ave. to Palace Ave. ;Q�Q � I1�ITTATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public ' 1 u Works as public necessity on the basis of four (4) complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with heaves, asghalt patches, setfled and cracked panels. ................................................................... 79?0�3 � ` �� PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. S. HOWELL ST. from Palace Ave. to Jaznes Ave: I1vITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, scaled, settled and cracked panels. PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWAI,H N.S. JAMES AVE. from S. Fairview Ave. to S. Howell St. IIVITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of two (2) complaints, a petition with one (1) signer and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, disintegrated, scaled, settled and cracked panels. ................................................................... PROJECT: RECON5TRUCT SIDEWALg B.S. SUMNER S1: from Bayard Ave. to Eleanor Ave. �g,o$�j IIVITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with scaled, setfled and cracked panels. ................................................................... CITY OF ST. P?�UL PRELIMINARY ORDER > �1'� - �rt � COUN Z F E NO �� By � File No._597082-597085 Voting Ward_3 In the Matter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following location(s): 597082 - East side of Edgcumbe Rd from Juliet Ave to Palace Ave_ 597083 - Both sides of S Fiowell St from Palace Ave to James Ave. 597084 - North side of James Ave from S Fairview Ave to S Howell Ave. S97085 - Both sides Sumner St from Bayard Ave to Eleanor Ave. *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.45 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New constxuction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1 E 3 That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1997 Public Improvement Aid. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 6th day of August, 1997, at 4:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays ✓Blakey �strom 1/C�ol l ins �fi'arris �Megard �rton �hune 2 2n Favor v Against Adopted by Council: Date�� t� Certified Passed by Council Secretary By �..._ c�-. Mayor