The URL can be used to link to this page

97-976CITY OF ST. PAi7L FINAL ORDBR Fil� No In the Matter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the fo110 Both sides Blair Ave from N Chatsworth St to N Oxford St. *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES location(s>: S9 RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstructioa (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.45 per £ront £oot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. Al1 other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RSSIDENTIAL, RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot_ under Preliminary order q " The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all e�enses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays ✓Blakey Bostrom— (�b5e��" �llins i/ff �arri s �gard � rton Thune — �b�� Adopted by Council: Date�� q� Certified Passed by Council Secretary S In Favor By 1 \_ �. -F-l��. � QAgainst 4 `'—'^ - a ^ � Mayor f-� \ • Public Hearing Date — Au ust 6 1997 RE 5-30-97 �� —�� o o�,�,��roFF��N�� DATEINITIATED GREEN SHEET NO. �2246 Public Works Sidewalks 5-21-9� N�ITfAUDAT �Rwwn� COMACTPERSON&PHONE OEPpRTMENTDIREGTOR CRYCOUNCIL RobertA.Lissick-2666121 �N �CENATTORNEY cmc�Ea�c MUSTBEONCOUNCILAGENDABY(DAiE) 6-18-97 ��n�� aBUDGETDIqECTOR FIN.&MG7.SEFiVICESDIR. Must be in Council Research Office � MAYOR(ORASSISTANn �Coundl Research b noon Frida 6-6-97 ❑ TOTAL 7F OF SIGIWNHE PAGES I _(CLSP ALL LoCA7W Wa FOH SGNASUP� ASSoCIATE EMAL P,CWUNTAM' ACTIONAEWESTED ` �� ['�a��} Reconstruct Sidewa{k in Ward 1(See �tacfied list) `� ��` � 1 � �. �- R'? 3 2 - �ss7 aEtbMAtE1JOA7roNS: tppm+a lW a� tPo PEHSONAL SERVICE CONTRACfS UUST FOLLOWINti WIESTIONS: _ p�pNN�NG GOMM15SqN _CIYtL sERV10E CbMMISS�I 7. Has ihis Pe ES � NO� �� under a wntract fw is deParrtnent? V qB CoMM1TTEE 2. Has ihispersonlfirm ever 6een a city employee? — — YES NO A STAFF 3. Does G�is personlfirm possass a skiff not normaity possassed by arry airrem aq — employee? _DISTFICTCOUNCIL'� _ YES NO SUPPOflTS WFiICH COUNqL OBJECTNE? �We�^ �� Yes e�sWars on sepsrate sheet eM attaeh ta green shaet � � INITIqTING PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPORTUNITY (WHO, WHAT, WHEN. WHEflE, WHV): The problem "defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, akernating free/[haw cycles, service i'rfe limits, chemical additives, eMreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide level and must be addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations. ADVANTAGES IF APPflOVED: The community wilf benefit from this project because it will provide safe detect free sidewalks for its many citizens. The sidewalk contracts are executed by private contractors, so it follows that private sector jobs are created as a result of this activity. DISADVANTAGES IF APPflOVED: Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment. Simp{y stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it still remainsconCroversiai. ,�� ,�� ' �''�� ;� �._ �°_, � �°�>� �` `� t�i�s; DISAOYANTAGES IF NOT APPROYED: � ' � ""-' �� This option wouid allow the irrfrastrudure oS sidewalk stock to deteriorate, wtiich in tum, will generate more petsonal injury suits, uftimate�y resulting in ihe expenditure of larger dollar amounts in eventua� repairs and/or replacement, as well as claim payouts. TOTALAMWMOFTHANSACTIONS 9,1]2,��f COST/REVENUEBUDGETED(CIRCLEONE) YES No FUNDINGSOUHCE 97-i1 A, PCA 97 = 557 �000 pCITVRYNUMBEH C97�2T729-0784-27012 FINANCIAI INFORMATION: (EXPLAIN) B� AST = 300 � OOO C, Cf6 97 = 50,000 � I3MMARY OF ENGINEERIN RECO NDATI N Ward 1 ' � 1� FROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALg B.S. BLAIRAVE. from N. Chatswortli St. to N. O�'ord St. �'I - �l `7 S� INITIATING ACTIOPT: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of sixteen (16� compiaints and an inspection of the walk. _ EXISTING CONDITIONS: This waik is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, disintegrated, scaled and setUed panels. ................................................................... �`1 - 9 `� S� CITY OF ST. PAUL PRELIMiNARY ORDER COUNCIL FILE By Fil No Vo ina ' � /� Sn the Matter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following location(s): Both sides Blair Ave from N Ckaatsworth St to N Oxford St. *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Raconstruation (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.45 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New constzuction iWhere no walk existed) - 100g of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. A11 corner resiflential properL•ies will receive a credit up to the first 156 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new ancl reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: EI 2 3 That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1997 Public Improvement Aid. That a public hearing be had on saicl improvement on the 6th day of August, 1997, at 4:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court Aouse Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons ancl in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COi7NCILPERSONS Yeas Nays �Blakey ✓.8ostrom �Collins VHarri s I�zgard �- �b5�r� ��Morton �/'1'hune `� In Favor QAgainst t �bs ��'c Adopted by Council: Date � � � � Certified Passed by Council Secretary By ��ci-�._�\ ��- Mayor CITY OF ST. PAi7L FINAL ORDBR Fil� No In the Matter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the fo110 Both sides Blair Ave from N Chatsworth St to N Oxford St. *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES location(s>: S9 RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstructioa (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.45 per £ront £oot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. Al1 other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RSSIDENTIAL, RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot_ under Preliminary order q " The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all e�enses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays ✓Blakey Bostrom— (�b5e��" �llins i/ff �arri s �gard � rton Thune — �b�� Adopted by Council: Date�� q� Certified Passed by Council Secretary S In Favor By 1 \_ �. -F-l��. � QAgainst 4 `'—'^ - a ^ � Mayor f-� \ • Public Hearing Date — Au ust 6 1997 RE 5-30-97 �� —�� o o�,�,��roFF��N�� DATEINITIATED GREEN SHEET NO. �2246 Public Works Sidewalks 5-21-9� N�ITfAUDAT �Rwwn� COMACTPERSON&PHONE OEPpRTMENTDIREGTOR CRYCOUNCIL RobertA.Lissick-2666121 �N �CENATTORNEY cmc�Ea�c MUSTBEONCOUNCILAGENDABY(DAiE) 6-18-97 ��n�� aBUDGETDIqECTOR FIN.&MG7.SEFiVICESDIR. Must be in Council Research Office � MAYOR(ORASSISTANn �Coundl Research b noon Frida 6-6-97 ❑ TOTAL 7F OF SIGIWNHE PAGES I _(CLSP ALL LoCA7W Wa FOH SGNASUP� ASSoCIATE EMAL P,CWUNTAM' ACTIONAEWESTED ` �� ['�a��} Reconstruct Sidewa{k in Ward 1(See �tacfied list) `� ��` � 1 � �. �- R'? 3 2 - �ss7 aEtbMAtE1JOA7roNS: tppm+a lW a� tPo PEHSONAL SERVICE CONTRACfS UUST FOLLOWINti WIESTIONS: _ p�pNN�NG GOMM15SqN _CIYtL sERV10E CbMMISS�I 7. Has ihis Pe ES � NO� �� under a wntract fw is deParrtnent? V qB CoMM1TTEE 2. Has ihispersonlfirm ever 6een a city employee? — — YES NO A STAFF 3. Does G�is personlfirm possass a skiff not normaity possassed by arry airrem aq — employee? _DISTFICTCOUNCIL'� _ YES NO SUPPOflTS WFiICH COUNqL OBJECTNE? �We�^ �� Yes e�sWars on sepsrate sheet eM attaeh ta green shaet � � INITIqTING PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPORTUNITY (WHO, WHAT, WHEN. WHEflE, WHV): The problem "defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, akernating free/[haw cycles, service i'rfe limits, chemical additives, eMreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide level and must be addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations. ADVANTAGES IF APPflOVED: The community wilf benefit from this project because it will provide safe detect free sidewalks for its many citizens. The sidewalk contracts are executed by private contractors, so it follows that private sector jobs are created as a result of this activity. DISADVANTAGES IF APPflOVED: Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment. Simp{y stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it still remainsconCroversiai. ,�� ,�� ' �''�� ;� �._ �°_, � �°�>� �` `� t�i�s; DISAOYANTAGES IF NOT APPROYED: � ' � ""-' �� This option wouid allow the irrfrastrudure oS sidewalk stock to deteriorate, wtiich in tum, will generate more petsonal injury suits, uftimate�y resulting in ihe expenditure of larger dollar amounts in eventua� repairs and/or replacement, as well as claim payouts. TOTALAMWMOFTHANSACTIONS 9,1]2,��f COST/REVENUEBUDGETED(CIRCLEONE) YES No FUNDINGSOUHCE 97-i1 A, PCA 97 = 557 �000 pCITVRYNUMBEH C97�2T729-0784-27012 FINANCIAI INFORMATION: (EXPLAIN) B� AST = 300 � OOO C, Cf6 97 = 50,000 � I3MMARY OF ENGINEERIN RECO NDATI N Ward 1 ' � 1� FROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALg B.S. BLAIRAVE. from N. Chatswortli St. to N. O�'ord St. �'I - �l `7 S� INITIATING ACTIOPT: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of sixteen (16� compiaints and an inspection of the walk. _ EXISTING CONDITIONS: This waik is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, disintegrated, scaled and setUed panels. ................................................................... �`1 - 9 `� S� CITY OF ST. PAUL PRELIMiNARY ORDER COUNCIL FILE By Fil No Vo ina ' � /� Sn the Matter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following location(s): Both sides Blair Ave from N Ckaatsworth St to N Oxford St. *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Raconstruation (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.45 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New constzuction iWhere no walk existed) - 100g of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. A11 corner resiflential properL•ies will receive a credit up to the first 156 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new ancl reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: EI 2 3 That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1997 Public Improvement Aid. That a public hearing be had on saicl improvement on the 6th day of August, 1997, at 4:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court Aouse Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons ancl in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COi7NCILPERSONS Yeas Nays �Blakey ✓.8ostrom �Collins VHarri s I�zgard �- �b5�r� ��Morton �/'1'hune `� In Favor QAgainst t �bs ��'c Adopted by Council: Date � � � � Certified Passed by Council Secretary By ��ci-�._�\ ��- Mayor CITY OF ST. PAi7L FINAL ORDBR Fil� No In the Matter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the fo110 Both sides Blair Ave from N Chatsworth St to N Oxford St. *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES location(s>: S9 RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstructioa (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.45 per £ront £oot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. Al1 other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RSSIDENTIAL, RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot_ under Preliminary order q " The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all e�enses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays ✓Blakey Bostrom— (�b5e��" �llins i/ff �arri s �gard � rton Thune — �b�� Adopted by Council: Date�� q� Certified Passed by Council Secretary S In Favor By 1 \_ �. -F-l��. � QAgainst 4 `'—'^ - a ^ � Mayor f-� \ • Public Hearing Date — Au ust 6 1997 RE 5-30-97 �� —�� o o�,�,��roFF��N�� DATEINITIATED GREEN SHEET NO. �2246 Public Works Sidewalks 5-21-9� N�ITfAUDAT �Rwwn� COMACTPERSON&PHONE OEPpRTMENTDIREGTOR CRYCOUNCIL RobertA.Lissick-2666121 �N �CENATTORNEY cmc�Ea�c MUSTBEONCOUNCILAGENDABY(DAiE) 6-18-97 ��n�� aBUDGETDIqECTOR FIN.&MG7.SEFiVICESDIR. Must be in Council Research Office � MAYOR(ORASSISTANn �Coundl Research b noon Frida 6-6-97 ❑ TOTAL 7F OF SIGIWNHE PAGES I _(CLSP ALL LoCA7W Wa FOH SGNASUP� ASSoCIATE EMAL P,CWUNTAM' ACTIONAEWESTED ` �� ['�a��} Reconstruct Sidewa{k in Ward 1(See �tacfied list) `� ��` � 1 � �. �- R'? 3 2 - �ss7 aEtbMAtE1JOA7roNS: tppm+a lW a� tPo PEHSONAL SERVICE CONTRACfS UUST FOLLOWINti WIESTIONS: _ p�pNN�NG GOMM15SqN _CIYtL sERV10E CbMMISS�I 7. Has ihis Pe ES � NO� �� under a wntract fw is deParrtnent? V qB CoMM1TTEE 2. Has ihispersonlfirm ever 6een a city employee? — — YES NO A STAFF 3. Does G�is personlfirm possass a skiff not normaity possassed by arry airrem aq — employee? _DISTFICTCOUNCIL'� _ YES NO SUPPOflTS WFiICH COUNqL OBJECTNE? �We�^ �� Yes e�sWars on sepsrate sheet eM attaeh ta green shaet � � INITIqTING PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPORTUNITY (WHO, WHAT, WHEN. WHEflE, WHV): The problem "defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, akernating free/[haw cycles, service i'rfe limits, chemical additives, eMreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide level and must be addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations. ADVANTAGES IF APPflOVED: The community wilf benefit from this project because it will provide safe detect free sidewalks for its many citizens. The sidewalk contracts are executed by private contractors, so it follows that private sector jobs are created as a result of this activity. DISADVANTAGES IF APPflOVED: Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment. Simp{y stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it still remainsconCroversiai. ,�� ,�� ' �''�� ;� �._ �°_, � �°�>� �` `� t�i�s; DISAOYANTAGES IF NOT APPROYED: � ' � ""-' �� This option wouid allow the irrfrastrudure oS sidewalk stock to deteriorate, wtiich in tum, will generate more petsonal injury suits, uftimate�y resulting in ihe expenditure of larger dollar amounts in eventua� repairs and/or replacement, as well as claim payouts. TOTALAMWMOFTHANSACTIONS 9,1]2,��f COST/REVENUEBUDGETED(CIRCLEONE) YES No FUNDINGSOUHCE 97-i1 A, PCA 97 = 557 �000 pCITVRYNUMBEH C97�2T729-0784-27012 FINANCIAI INFORMATION: (EXPLAIN) B� AST = 300 � OOO C, Cf6 97 = 50,000 � I3MMARY OF ENGINEERIN RECO NDATI N Ward 1 ' � 1� FROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALg B.S. BLAIRAVE. from N. Chatswortli St. to N. O�'ord St. �'I - �l `7 S� INITIATING ACTIOPT: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of sixteen (16� compiaints and an inspection of the walk. _ EXISTING CONDITIONS: This waik is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, disintegrated, scaled and setUed panels. ................................................................... �`1 - 9 `� S� CITY OF ST. PAUL PRELIMiNARY ORDER COUNCIL FILE By Fil No Vo ina ' � /� Sn the Matter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following location(s): Both sides Blair Ave from N Ckaatsworth St to N Oxford St. *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Raconstruation (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.45 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New constzuction iWhere no walk existed) - 100g of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. A11 corner resiflential properL•ies will receive a credit up to the first 156 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new ancl reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: EI 2 3 That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1997 Public Improvement Aid. That a public hearing be had on saicl improvement on the 6th day of August, 1997, at 4:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court Aouse Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons ancl in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COi7NCILPERSONS Yeas Nays �Blakey ✓.8ostrom �Collins VHarri s I�zgard �- �b5�r� ��Morton �/'1'hune `� In Favor QAgainst t �bs ��'c Adopted by Council: Date � � � � Certified Passed by Council Secretary By ��ci-�._�\ ��- Mayor