The URL can be used to link to this page

97-973CITY OF ST. PAUL COUNCIL FILE / NO. �^ \'1� 53 FINAI, ORDER � e- .�• � By ��y�!��117�"1 . I i � i � ; ,� ; = File No._597067 � "° Voting Ward_6 In the Matter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following location(s): on both sides East Geranium Ave from Earl St to Duluth St. LAID OVSR BY COUNCIL ON 7-23-97 TO 8-6-97. *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATE5 (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.45 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. Al1 other widths will be prorated accordingly. Nem construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIA2, RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. under Preliminary order 97-621 approved May 28, 1997 The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers sha11 calculate all eapenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays �Blakey �strom— (�bS�r� c/Collins Harris Megard — (�YJSe.r�" �/fiorton Thune — (�b5-cy�}- �In Favor � Against 3 A.�JSeK�� Adopted by Council: Date�, 1�� Certified Passed by Council 5ecretary By��, . �-�,.,a�,�— �v /� Mayor Public Hearing Date - August 6, 1997 RE 8-1-97 _q J n T.M.S.lREAL ESTATE DIVISION Date: 3uly 31, 1997 Green Sheet Num . 3 5 8 ontad Person and Yhone N�ber: EPARTMENf DIRE(TOR C17'Y COl7NCll. Peter White 266-8850 A �` UDGEf DIItF.CTOR FFICE OF FINAN(.7AL SVCS. us[ be on Counca Agenas by: LAID OVER BY Yox (ox ass�srarrr) i ourrcu. RFC�suca OTAL # OF SIGNATURE PAGES i �cr.s ntr, r.ocn�rcoxs Fox s�cxn�� C7'iON REQUESTF.D: AT COUNCIL'S REQUEST ON 7-23-97 TO 8-6-97 REC�N. OF SIDEWALK WAS LAID OVER. Approve reconstruction of sidewalk on both sides of EAST GERADTILTM AVENUE from Earl Street to Duluth Street. ile No. S97067 COMMENDAT[ONS: APPROVE (A) 08 REIF.CC (R) ONAL SERVICE CO1V172ACTS MOST ANSWER TIIE FOLLOWING: _ . Has the pe�soo/tum wer worked undec a coutrad for this departmeut? YFS NO PLANNING COMFIISSION A STAFF . Has this persodfirm ever been a City employee? YES NO crvn, serzncs commnssiox . Does tLis persodfirm possess a sldll not normally possessed by any YES Nm cm co�uTTae current Ci4y employee? E lai¢ all YES answers on a se arate sheet and attach. roxTS wfnca covxcu, os.�cTivE� Neighborhoods COUNCII. WARll(S) (� DISTRICT PLANNING COUNCII, { 1'ING PROBLEM, ISSITE, OPPORTUNITY (Who, {Vhat, When, WLem, Why?): Replacement of sidewalks is necessary and consistent with city policy. VANTAGES IF APPROVED: Same as above. ISADVANPAGES IF AYPROVED: � ` °a "' ° ��'�� '��'��"� Benefitted property owners have assessments payable via property tases. ti��-` 1 `t�:97 ISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED: The sidewalk would continue to be a hazard potentially resulting in legal action bemg brought � against the city due to in�uries sustained as a result of the hazardous wallt. OTAL AMOUNT OF 1'RANSACTION: COST/REVENUE BUDGETED (CIItCLE ONE) YES NO ACTIVCfY NUMffiER: FUNDING SOURCE INANCIAL INFORMATION: (E�PLAIlV) `�'1-�1`l 3 CITY OF ST. PASII, FINAI, ORDER 597069 - North side o£ E Magnolia Ave £rom Cypress St to Earl St � ` �', 9 �{3 �� In the Matter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following location(s): 597066 - South side of E Arlington Ave from Greenbrier St to Walsh St 597067 - Both sides E Geranium Ave £rom Earl St to Duluth St— 1�ct��cl C ��e�^ � A.� i C;-}-��.,"r: ,� 597068 - Both sides Greenbrier St £rom York Ave to 5ims Ave (�\ ��-. 59707Q - Both sides Sherwood Ave from Edgerton St to Payne Ave 597071 - Both sides Weide St from York Ave to Sims Ave ��.ti�a�a ��9� COUNCIL FILE NO By File No.,S97066-597071 Voting Ward 6 -.. � �, � : � � � � � . ��` �� V C �� ,,a�-� - � �� _ . ► �� qrz - �l �13 S�-q�9�1Yd' *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three £amily structures) Reconstructioa treplacement of old sidewalk} -$7.45 per front £oot £or a five (5} foot wide walk and $8.94 per £ront foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New constructioa (where no walk existed) - 100� of tlze actual cost estimated to be approximately $3_33 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three £amily structures), I30N RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. under Preliminary order � � - � � The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a publ.ic hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City of£icers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FUR'I`AER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and sha11 report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 0£ the City Charter. COUNCILPERSORTB Yeas Nays ✓Blakey ✓Bostrom �ollins �rris Megard- Absc�r�� v�orton Thune - {��pSzr�t' �In Favor �Against ;2 ��`(�� Adopted by Council : Date �.� ��`j'� i Certified Passed by Council Secretary By�� v � .r,� . Mayor Public Hearing Date - .I >Afl7MENTlOFFICElCUUNCIL iblic Works Sidewalks NTACT PEflSON 8 PHONE �bert A. Lissick - 266-6121 ST BE ON CAUNCIL AGENDA BY (DA7E) (�-4 ;ust be in Council Resea by noon Friday 5-23-97 fAl i OF SGNATURE PAGES � 23, 1997 RE 5-16-97 DATErtN'ITIATED GREEN 9� �i�- SHEET `� _ INITIAUOATE _ INITIAL/DATE ^ � DEPAFTMENT DIflECTOR ASSIGN "' ❑GTYATTORNEY NUM'eER FO:: RWT4XG �gUOGETDIflECTOfl Office ��+ - ❑ MA�Ofl (OR ASSISTANT) __ �CIJP ALL LOCATONS FOfl SIGNA7UAE) n ASSOCIAlE Recxinstruct Sidewalk in Ward 6(See attached list) FIN. E MGT. Research 7 � �A5 NDA710NS:iWp�ure{A}orRejeix(R) PERSONALSEAVICECONTRACTSMUS7ANSWERTHEFOLLOVi1NGQUESTIONS: PLpNNMG COMMISSION _�'�� SEflVICE CAMMISSiON 1- Has this �ES n � r NOer worked under a contract for ffiis departmeni? CIB C�MMITTEE 2. Has this person/fvm ever been a ary employee? — YES NO STAFF 3. Does m�s perwn/firm po55es5 a 5ki11 not iwrma4ly possessed by any curreni ciry emplayee� DISTHICTCOUNCIL�� - __ I YES NO Explain all yes answers on separate sheet and attaeh to green shaot The problem "defecfive sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, alternating freefthaw cycles, service !'rfo limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variatio�s, eta These problems occur on a cdywide level and must be addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Leh uncorrected, tne sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusabie and subject to increased pedestrian injuries trom falis and possible litigations. The communRy wi!! bene{h fcom this project @ecause rt wil( prowd? sate detect free sidewalks for its many citizens. The sidewalk contracts are executed by privaie contraetors, so rt follows tnat private sector jobs are created as a resuR ot this activity. Historically, the sidewalk recortstructions have created negai+ve teedback in the area of construction procedure and assessmeni. Simply stated, proparty owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, B still remains cantroversiai. - ��„�.. � _ !; t�� DISADVANTAGES IF NO7 APPROVED: This option would allow thelntrastruc:ure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, wiH generate more personal injury suits, uftimately res�lting in the expenditure of larger dofiar amounts in eventual repairs andJOr replacement, as well as claim payouts. TOTALAMOIltiTOFTRANSACT10N5 7�. b��,SO COST/REVENUEBUDGETED(CIRCLEONEj FUNDMGSWRCE 97-t�-C667 A, Pf! °! _'�� 0�� ACITVITYNUMBER L97-2T799-( FINANCIALMFORMATION:(E%PLAIN) e, asT = �oa �OOO NO c. ci° �7 = ;c,;��^: CITY OF ST. PAUL COUNCIL FILE / NO. �^ \'1� 53 FINAI, ORDER � e- .�• � By ��y�!��117�"1 . I i � i � ; ,� ; = File No._597067 � "° Voting Ward_6 In the Matter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following location(s): on both sides East Geranium Ave from Earl St to Duluth St. LAID OVSR BY COUNCIL ON 7-23-97 TO 8-6-97. *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATE5 (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.45 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. Al1 other widths will be prorated accordingly. Nem construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIA2, RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. under Preliminary order 97-621 approved May 28, 1997 The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers sha11 calculate all eapenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays �Blakey �strom— (�bS�r� c/Collins Harris Megard — (�YJSe.r�" �/fiorton Thune — (�b5-cy�}- �In Favor � Against 3 A.�JSeK�� Adopted by Council: Date�, 1�� Certified Passed by Council 5ecretary By��, . �-�,.,a�,�— �v /� Mayor Public Hearing Date - August 6, 1997 RE 8-1-97 _q J n T.M.S.lREAL ESTATE DIVISION Date: 3uly 31, 1997 Green Sheet Num . 3 5 8 ontad Person and Yhone N�ber: EPARTMENf DIRE(TOR C17'Y COl7NCll. Peter White 266-8850 A �` UDGEf DIItF.CTOR FFICE OF FINAN(.7AL SVCS. us[ be on Counca Agenas by: LAID OVER BY Yox (ox ass�srarrr) i ourrcu. RFC�suca OTAL # OF SIGNATURE PAGES i �cr.s ntr, r.ocn�rcoxs Fox s�cxn�� C7'iON REQUESTF.D: AT COUNCIL'S REQUEST ON 7-23-97 TO 8-6-97 REC�N. OF SIDEWALK WAS LAID OVER. Approve reconstruction of sidewalk on both sides of EAST GERADTILTM AVENUE from Earl Street to Duluth Street. ile No. S97067 COMMENDAT[ONS: APPROVE (A) 08 REIF.CC (R) ONAL SERVICE CO1V172ACTS MOST ANSWER TIIE FOLLOWING: _ . Has the pe�soo/tum wer worked undec a coutrad for this departmeut? YFS NO PLANNING COMFIISSION A STAFF . Has this persodfirm ever been a City employee? YES NO crvn, serzncs commnssiox . Does tLis persodfirm possess a sldll not normally possessed by any YES Nm cm co�uTTae current Ci4y employee? E lai¢ all YES answers on a se arate sheet and attach. roxTS wfnca covxcu, os.�cTivE� Neighborhoods COUNCII. WARll(S) (� DISTRICT PLANNING COUNCII, { 1'ING PROBLEM, ISSITE, OPPORTUNITY (Who, {Vhat, When, WLem, Why?): Replacement of sidewalks is necessary and consistent with city policy. VANTAGES IF APPROVED: Same as above. ISADVANPAGES IF AYPROVED: � ` °a "' ° ��'�� '��'��"� Benefitted property owners have assessments payable via property tases. ti��-` 1 `t�:97 ISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED: The sidewalk would continue to be a hazard potentially resulting in legal action bemg brought � against the city due to in�uries sustained as a result of the hazardous wallt. OTAL AMOUNT OF 1'RANSACTION: COST/REVENUE BUDGETED (CIItCLE ONE) YES NO ACTIVCfY NUMffiER: FUNDING SOURCE INANCIAL INFORMATION: (E�PLAIlV) `�'1-�1`l 3 CITY OF ST. PASII, FINAI, ORDER 597069 - North side o£ E Magnolia Ave £rom Cypress St to Earl St � ` �', 9 �{3 �� In the Matter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following location(s): 597066 - South side of E Arlington Ave from Greenbrier St to Walsh St 597067 - Both sides E Geranium Ave £rom Earl St to Duluth St— 1�ct��cl C ��e�^ � A.� i C;-}-��.,"r: ,� 597068 - Both sides Greenbrier St £rom York Ave to 5ims Ave (�\ ��-. 59707Q - Both sides Sherwood Ave from Edgerton St to Payne Ave 597071 - Both sides Weide St from York Ave to Sims Ave ��.ti�a�a ��9� COUNCIL FILE NO By File No.,S97066-597071 Voting Ward 6 -.. � �, � : � � � � � . ��` �� V C �� ,,a�-� - � �� _ . ► �� qrz - �l �13 S�-q�9�1Yd' *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three £amily structures) Reconstructioa treplacement of old sidewalk} -$7.45 per front £oot £or a five (5} foot wide walk and $8.94 per £ront foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New constructioa (where no walk existed) - 100� of tlze actual cost estimated to be approximately $3_33 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three £amily structures), I30N RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. under Preliminary order � � - � � The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a publ.ic hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City of£icers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FUR'I`AER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and sha11 report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 0£ the City Charter. COUNCILPERSORTB Yeas Nays ✓Blakey ✓Bostrom �ollins �rris Megard- Absc�r�� v�orton Thune - {��pSzr�t' �In Favor �Against ;2 ��`(�� Adopted by Council : Date �.� ��`j'� i Certified Passed by Council Secretary By�� v � .r,� . Mayor Public Hearing Date - .I >Afl7MENTlOFFICElCUUNCIL iblic Works Sidewalks NTACT PEflSON 8 PHONE �bert A. Lissick - 266-6121 ST BE ON CAUNCIL AGENDA BY (DA7E) (�-4 ;ust be in Council Resea by noon Friday 5-23-97 fAl i OF SGNATURE PAGES � 23, 1997 RE 5-16-97 DATErtN'ITIATED GREEN 9� �i�- SHEET `� _ INITIAUOATE _ INITIAL/DATE ^ � DEPAFTMENT DIflECTOR ASSIGN "' ❑GTYATTORNEY NUM'eER FO:: RWT4XG �gUOGETDIflECTOfl Office ��+ - ❑ MA�Ofl (OR ASSISTANT) __ �CIJP ALL LOCATONS FOfl SIGNA7UAE) n ASSOCIAlE Recxinstruct Sidewalk in Ward 6(See attached list) FIN. E MGT. Research 7 � �A5 NDA710NS:iWp�ure{A}orRejeix(R) PERSONALSEAVICECONTRACTSMUS7ANSWERTHEFOLLOVi1NGQUESTIONS: PLpNNMG COMMISSION _�'�� SEflVICE CAMMISSiON 1- Has this �ES n � r NOer worked under a contract for ffiis departmeni? CIB C�MMITTEE 2. Has this person/fvm ever been a ary employee? — YES NO STAFF 3. Does m�s perwn/firm po55es5 a 5ki11 not iwrma4ly possessed by any curreni ciry emplayee� DISTHICTCOUNCIL�� - __ I YES NO Explain all yes answers on separate sheet and attaeh to green shaot The problem "defecfive sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, alternating freefthaw cycles, service !'rfo limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variatio�s, eta These problems occur on a cdywide level and must be addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Leh uncorrected, tne sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusabie and subject to increased pedestrian injuries trom falis and possible litigations. The communRy wi!! bene{h fcom this project @ecause rt wil( prowd? sate detect free sidewalks for its many citizens. The sidewalk contracts are executed by privaie contraetors, so rt follows tnat private sector jobs are created as a resuR ot this activity. Historically, the sidewalk recortstructions have created negai+ve teedback in the area of construction procedure and assessmeni. Simply stated, proparty owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, B still remains cantroversiai. - ��„�.. � _ !; t�� DISADVANTAGES IF NO7 APPROVED: This option would allow thelntrastruc:ure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, wiH generate more personal injury suits, uftimately res�lting in the expenditure of larger dofiar amounts in eventual repairs andJOr replacement, as well as claim payouts. TOTALAMOIltiTOFTRANSACT10N5 7�. b��,SO COST/REVENUEBUDGETED(CIRCLEONEj FUNDMGSWRCE 97-t�-C667 A, Pf! °! _'�� 0�� ACITVITYNUMBER L97-2T799-( FINANCIALMFORMATION:(E%PLAIN) e, asT = �oa �OOO NO c. ci° �7 = ;c,;��^: CITY OF ST. PAUL COUNCIL FILE / NO. �^ \'1� 53 FINAI, ORDER � e- .�• � By ��y�!��117�"1 . I i � i � ; ,� ; = File No._597067 � "° Voting Ward_6 In the Matter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following location(s): on both sides East Geranium Ave from Earl St to Duluth St. LAID OVSR BY COUNCIL ON 7-23-97 TO 8-6-97. *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATE5 (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.45 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. Al1 other widths will be prorated accordingly. Nem construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIA2, RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. under Preliminary order 97-621 approved May 28, 1997 The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers sha11 calculate all eapenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays �Blakey �strom— (�bS�r� c/Collins Harris Megard — (�YJSe.r�" �/fiorton Thune — (�b5-cy�}- �In Favor � Against 3 A.�JSeK�� Adopted by Council: Date�, 1�� Certified Passed by Council 5ecretary By��, . �-�,.,a�,�— �v /� Mayor Public Hearing Date - August 6, 1997 RE 8-1-97 _q J n T.M.S.lREAL ESTATE DIVISION Date: 3uly 31, 1997 Green Sheet Num . 3 5 8 ontad Person and Yhone N�ber: EPARTMENf DIRE(TOR C17'Y COl7NCll. Peter White 266-8850 A �` UDGEf DIItF.CTOR FFICE OF FINAN(.7AL SVCS. us[ be on Counca Agenas by: LAID OVER BY Yox (ox ass�srarrr) i ourrcu. RFC�suca OTAL # OF SIGNATURE PAGES i �cr.s ntr, r.ocn�rcoxs Fox s�cxn�� C7'iON REQUESTF.D: AT COUNCIL'S REQUEST ON 7-23-97 TO 8-6-97 REC�N. OF SIDEWALK WAS LAID OVER. Approve reconstruction of sidewalk on both sides of EAST GERADTILTM AVENUE from Earl Street to Duluth Street. ile No. S97067 COMMENDAT[ONS: APPROVE (A) 08 REIF.CC (R) ONAL SERVICE CO1V172ACTS MOST ANSWER TIIE FOLLOWING: _ . Has the pe�soo/tum wer worked undec a coutrad for this departmeut? YFS NO PLANNING COMFIISSION A STAFF . Has this persodfirm ever been a City employee? YES NO crvn, serzncs commnssiox . Does tLis persodfirm possess a sldll not normally possessed by any YES Nm cm co�uTTae current Ci4y employee? E lai¢ all YES answers on a se arate sheet and attach. roxTS wfnca covxcu, os.�cTivE� Neighborhoods COUNCII. WARll(S) (� DISTRICT PLANNING COUNCII, { 1'ING PROBLEM, ISSITE, OPPORTUNITY (Who, {Vhat, When, WLem, Why?): Replacement of sidewalks is necessary and consistent with city policy. VANTAGES IF APPROVED: Same as above. ISADVANPAGES IF AYPROVED: � ` °a "' ° ��'�� '��'��"� Benefitted property owners have assessments payable via property tases. ti��-` 1 `t�:97 ISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED: The sidewalk would continue to be a hazard potentially resulting in legal action bemg brought � against the city due to in�uries sustained as a result of the hazardous wallt. OTAL AMOUNT OF 1'RANSACTION: COST/REVENUE BUDGETED (CIItCLE ONE) YES NO ACTIVCfY NUMffiER: FUNDING SOURCE INANCIAL INFORMATION: (E�PLAIlV) `�'1-�1`l 3 CITY OF ST. PASII, FINAI, ORDER 597069 - North side o£ E Magnolia Ave £rom Cypress St to Earl St � ` �', 9 �{3 �� In the Matter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following location(s): 597066 - South side of E Arlington Ave from Greenbrier St to Walsh St 597067 - Both sides E Geranium Ave £rom Earl St to Duluth St— 1�ct��cl C ��e�^ � A.� i C;-}-��.,"r: ,� 597068 - Both sides Greenbrier St £rom York Ave to 5ims Ave (�\ ��-. 59707Q - Both sides Sherwood Ave from Edgerton St to Payne Ave 597071 - Both sides Weide St from York Ave to Sims Ave ��.ti�a�a ��9� COUNCIL FILE NO By File No.,S97066-597071 Voting Ward 6 -.. � �, � : � � � � � . ��` �� V C �� ,,a�-� - � �� _ . ► �� qrz - �l �13 S�-q�9�1Yd' *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three £amily structures) Reconstructioa treplacement of old sidewalk} -$7.45 per front £oot £or a five (5} foot wide walk and $8.94 per £ront foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New constructioa (where no walk existed) - 100� of tlze actual cost estimated to be approximately $3_33 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three £amily structures), I30N RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. under Preliminary order � � - � � The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a publ.ic hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City of£icers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FUR'I`AER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and sha11 report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 0£ the City Charter. COUNCILPERSORTB Yeas Nays ✓Blakey ✓Bostrom �ollins �rris Megard- Absc�r�� v�orton Thune - {��pSzr�t' �In Favor �Against ;2 ��`(�� Adopted by Council : Date �.� ��`j'� i Certified Passed by Council Secretary By�� v � .r,� . Mayor Public Hearing Date - .I >Afl7MENTlOFFICElCUUNCIL iblic Works Sidewalks NTACT PEflSON 8 PHONE �bert A. Lissick - 266-6121 ST BE ON CAUNCIL AGENDA BY (DA7E) (�-4 ;ust be in Council Resea by noon Friday 5-23-97 fAl i OF SGNATURE PAGES � 23, 1997 RE 5-16-97 DATErtN'ITIATED GREEN 9� �i�- SHEET `� _ INITIAUOATE _ INITIAL/DATE ^ � DEPAFTMENT DIflECTOR ASSIGN "' ❑GTYATTORNEY NUM'eER FO:: RWT4XG �gUOGETDIflECTOfl Office ��+ - ❑ MA�Ofl (OR ASSISTANT) __ �CIJP ALL LOCATONS FOfl SIGNA7UAE) n ASSOCIAlE Recxinstruct Sidewalk in Ward 6(See attached list) FIN. E MGT. Research 7 � �A5 NDA710NS:iWp�ure{A}orRejeix(R) PERSONALSEAVICECONTRACTSMUS7ANSWERTHEFOLLOVi1NGQUESTIONS: PLpNNMG COMMISSION _�'�� SEflVICE CAMMISSiON 1- Has this �ES n � r NOer worked under a contract for ffiis departmeni? CIB C�MMITTEE 2. Has this person/fvm ever been a ary employee? — YES NO STAFF 3. Does m�s perwn/firm po55es5 a 5ki11 not iwrma4ly possessed by any curreni ciry emplayee� DISTHICTCOUNCIL�� - __ I YES NO Explain all yes answers on separate sheet and attaeh to green shaot The problem "defecfive sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, alternating freefthaw cycles, service !'rfo limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variatio�s, eta These problems occur on a cdywide level and must be addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Leh uncorrected, tne sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusabie and subject to increased pedestrian injuries trom falis and possible litigations. The communRy wi!! bene{h fcom this project @ecause rt wil( prowd? sate detect free sidewalks for its many citizens. The sidewalk contracts are executed by privaie contraetors, so rt follows tnat private sector jobs are created as a resuR ot this activity. Historically, the sidewalk recortstructions have created negai+ve teedback in the area of construction procedure and assessmeni. Simply stated, proparty owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, B still remains cantroversiai. - ��„�.. � _ !; t�� DISADVANTAGES IF NO7 APPROVED: This option would allow thelntrastruc:ure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, wiH generate more personal injury suits, uftimately res�lting in the expenditure of larger dofiar amounts in eventual repairs andJOr replacement, as well as claim payouts. TOTALAMOIltiTOFTRANSACT10N5 7�. b��,SO COST/REVENUEBUDGETED(CIRCLEONEj FUNDMGSWRCE 97-t�-C667 A, Pf! °! _'�� 0�� ACITVITYNUMBER L97-2T799-( FINANCIALMFORMATION:(E%PLAIN) e, asT = �oa �OOO NO c. ci° �7 = ;c,;��^: