The URL can be used to link to this page

97-929G ��, CITY OF ST. PAUL COUNCTL FILE NO. '"ta � c FINAL ORDER By File No. 597 2-597079 Voting Ward 7 Ia the Matter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following location(s): 597072 - Both sides Bush Ave from Stroh Drive to Weide St 597073 - Both sides Euclid St from Flandrau St to Kennard St 597074 - Both sides Forest St from Wilson Ave to Euclid St 597075 - With integral curb on the north side of E Seventh St from Ocean St to Johnson Pkwy at 1301 E Seventh only 597076 - Both sides E Sixth St from Cypress St to Earl St 597077 - Both sides E Third St from Cypress St to Ear1 St 597075 - Both sides E Third St from Forest St to Cypress St 597079 -&oth sides E Third St from Mendota St to Forest St � �-�Ia 9 *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDEI3TIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.45 per front foot for a five (5) £oot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot £or a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. Naw construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet o£ new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For'new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. under Preliminary The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereo£ having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers sha11 calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. CQUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays Blakey t/�} s trom t/�� 11ins �iarris Me� ard — AbSEY�� vlcforton Th�e _ Abs�r� S In Favor �Against �- '(�� ses�� Adopted by Council: Date\�a`_�� 1�� \ Certified Passed by Counci3 Secretary By \ a . A �� . z 'tl�� Mayor Publ'ic Hearing Date — 1u1y 23, 1997 RE 5-16-97 OEPAFiTMENT/OFfICE/COUNCIL OATEINITIATED GREEN SHEET NO. ss2?� Public Works Sidewalks 5-2-97 INITIAUDATE INITIAL/OATE CONTACTPEPSONBPHONE �DEPAPTMENTDIRECTOR �CITYCOUNCIL Robert A. Lissick - 266-6121 ��N � CRY ATTORNEY �CITV CLERK NUMBFR FOR MUS7HEONCOUNCILAGENDABY(DATE) (�-1{-9] ROUTING OgUDGETDIRECTOfl FIN.BMGT.SERVICESDIR. Must be in Council Research Office �p MAVOR(OPASSIS7ANn t�Coundt Research b noon Frida 5-23-97 ❑ TOTALMOFSIGNATUREPAGES 1 __ (CIJPALLLOCATONSFORSIGNATURE) � ASSOCIATE � DEPA ACCOUNTANT ACTION RE�UESTED ` r„�`{ Reconstruct Sidewalk 8� Reconstrud Sidewaik With tntegraf Curb in Ward 7(See attachecS list) t� `� '� '� Z� � RECOMMENDA7qNS: Apprwa (A� or Pejee (R2 PERSONAL 3ERVICE COMRACTS MUSt ANSWER THE FO�IOWING QUESTIONS: _PLANNING COMMISSION __CIVIL SENVICE COMMISSION �' ��15 �ES n/ � NOaf wofked Under a CAItt2G[ fOf 1hi3 depaflmen[? CIB COMMITTEE 2. Ha5 Mi5 person�rm eVef beBn a ciry employee? — — YES NO A STAFF 3. Does ihis persoNfirm possess a sltill not normally possessed by arry current ciq — — employee? _DISTRICTCOUNCRtI � _ YES NO SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL OBJECTNE7 �P�ain all yas answers on separeta sheet and anach to graen sheet INITIATING PROBLEM, ISSUE. OPPOR7UNITV (WHO, WHAT. WHEN, WHERE. WHV): The problem "defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, aRernating free/thaw cycles, service I'rfe limits, chemical additives, eutreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide level and must be addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk conddion would worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusable and subject to increased pedesirian injuries from fatls and possible iitigations. ADVANTAGESIFAPPROVED: The community will benefi[ from this project because it wiil provide safe detect free sidewalks for its many ckizens. The sidewafk contracts are executed by private conttactors, so it folfows that private sector jobs are created as a result of this activity. DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED: Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment. Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the tact up to one-half ihe assessment is City subsidized, it still remains controversial. ��;�.��.��`s �'J- ";N-; �'��"s�� :':,. .__. . . �.... ' � cy ��Y OISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED: �� This option would al�ow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal injury suits, ultimately resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in eventual repairs and/or replacement, as well as claim payouts. TOTALAMWMOFTFlANSACTION$ ��a SS�SO COSTIPEVENUEBUDGETED(CIRCIEONE) YES No FUNDMG SOUBCE g7'�' � x P�'� 97 � S�J� s�-�� pGTViTY NUMBEfl �97-2T729-0784-270] 2 FINANqAL INFORMPTION: (EXPLAIN) a a > C, Cfe 97 = S�,QQO SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATIONS Ward 7 q� ��9 �:��- 5� �'j PROJECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. BUSH AVE. from Stroh Dr. to � � � Weide St. IPTITIATING ACTIOl�: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of two (2} complaints, a petition with one (1) signer and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches and settied panels. ................................................................... !p �/� PROJECT• RECdNSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. EUCLID ST. from Flandrau St. / ( 1`V !% to Kennard St: ITiITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of two (2) complaints, a petition with one (1) signer and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, disintegrated, scaled, settled, cracked and spalled panels. .................................................................. � p�� PROJECT• RECONSTRiJCT SIDEWALS B.S. FOREST ST. from Wilson Ave. 7 to Euciid St. IriITTATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of two complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches and settled panels. ' ................................................................... L,�� f)I'1f� PROJECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALB WITH INTEGRAL CURB N.S. E. V�� SEVENTFi ST. from Ocean St. to Johnson Pkwy. at 1301 E. Seventh St. Only. TNITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of two (2} complaints, a petition with one (1) signer and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDTTIONS: This walk is poured concrete with asphalt patches. setfled and cracked panels. ................................................................... 5� /�/� PROJECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. E. SIXfH ST. from Cypress St, 1 U�� to Eaz1 st. . -2- q�_'�� INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of three (3) complaints and an inspection of the waik. EXTSTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, offgrade, asphalt patches, scaled, settled and cracked panels. ................................................................... ��n PROJECT• RECONSTRi3CT SIDEWALH B.S. E. THIRD ST. from Cypress St. 5 -� to Earl St. Ii�TITIATING ACTION: This order was as public necessity on the basis of one waik. initiated by the Director of Public Works {i) complaint and an inspection of the EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, scaled, settled and cracked panels. ................................................................... �no/K( PROJECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. E. THIRD ST. from Forest St. ► � o to Cypress St. INITIATING ACTIOri: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of two (2) complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: Tkus walk is poured concrete with tree heaves> asphalt patches, disintegrated, scaled, settled and cracked panels. ................................................................... � n� ^� PROJECT: RECOI�ISTRUCT SIDEWALS B.S. E. THIRD ST. from Mendota St. �� '/ to Forest St. I1ITITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of eight (8) complaints and an inspection of the walk.' E%ISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, offgrade, asphalt patches, scaled, setUed and cracked panels. .................................................................. .�-�-r `� � -� a-°I *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTSON RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.45 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the £irst 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of t'he property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100g o£ actual cost estimated to be approximately $9.50 per square foot. The Council of the City o£ Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: t L�a 3 That th=_ =�cz. r=_�a�t ��d t�*=_ s�a _s L.a��'v ana=oved Ki`h n.o alteruativ_s, �-� �� -:� �=r�� v ��___ - ��s= � _�r_. �G`r" _�_ e=_ c�s`scti v rates, �3nanced 3�y assessments and 199"7 Pu3�1iz Tmpravement A�d. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 23rd day of July, 1997, at 4:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays +i Blakey fostrom � ollins �arri s �egard �orton �une �In Favor �Against Adopted by Council: Date a8' \`t Certified Passed by Council Secretary s �,._ � a � Pfayar G ��, CITY OF ST. PAUL COUNCTL FILE NO. '"ta � c FINAL ORDER By File No. 597 2-597079 Voting Ward 7 Ia the Matter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following location(s): 597072 - Both sides Bush Ave from Stroh Drive to Weide St 597073 - Both sides Euclid St from Flandrau St to Kennard St 597074 - Both sides Forest St from Wilson Ave to Euclid St 597075 - With integral curb on the north side of E Seventh St from Ocean St to Johnson Pkwy at 1301 E Seventh only 597076 - Both sides E Sixth St from Cypress St to Earl St 597077 - Both sides E Third St from Cypress St to Ear1 St 597075 - Both sides E Third St from Forest St to Cypress St 597079 -&oth sides E Third St from Mendota St to Forest St � �-�Ia 9 *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDEI3TIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.45 per front foot for a five (5) £oot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot £or a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. Naw construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet o£ new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For'new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. under Preliminary The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereo£ having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers sha11 calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. CQUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays Blakey t/�} s trom t/�� 11ins �iarris Me� ard — AbSEY�� vlcforton Th�e _ Abs�r� S In Favor �Against �- '(�� ses�� Adopted by Council: Date\�a`_�� 1�� \ Certified Passed by Counci3 Secretary By \ a . A �� . z 'tl�� Mayor Publ'ic Hearing Date — 1u1y 23, 1997 RE 5-16-97 OEPAFiTMENT/OFfICE/COUNCIL OATEINITIATED GREEN SHEET NO. ss2?� Public Works Sidewalks 5-2-97 INITIAUDATE INITIAL/OATE CONTACTPEPSONBPHONE �DEPAPTMENTDIRECTOR �CITYCOUNCIL Robert A. Lissick - 266-6121 ��N � CRY ATTORNEY �CITV CLERK NUMBFR FOR MUS7HEONCOUNCILAGENDABY(DATE) (�-1{-9] ROUTING OgUDGETDIRECTOfl FIN.BMGT.SERVICESDIR. Must be in Council Research Office �p MAVOR(OPASSIS7ANn t�Coundt Research b noon Frida 5-23-97 ❑ TOTALMOFSIGNATUREPAGES 1 __ (CIJPALLLOCATONSFORSIGNATURE) � ASSOCIATE � DEPA ACCOUNTANT ACTION RE�UESTED ` r„�`{ Reconstruct Sidewalk 8� Reconstrud Sidewaik With tntegraf Curb in Ward 7(See attachecS list) t� `� '� '� Z� � RECOMMENDA7qNS: Apprwa (A� or Pejee (R2 PERSONAL 3ERVICE COMRACTS MUSt ANSWER THE FO�IOWING QUESTIONS: _PLANNING COMMISSION __CIVIL SENVICE COMMISSION �' ��15 �ES n/ � NOaf wofked Under a CAItt2G[ fOf 1hi3 depaflmen[? CIB COMMITTEE 2. Ha5 Mi5 person�rm eVef beBn a ciry employee? — — YES NO A STAFF 3. Does ihis persoNfirm possess a sltill not normally possessed by arry current ciq — — employee? _DISTRICTCOUNCRtI � _ YES NO SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL OBJECTNE7 �P�ain all yas answers on separeta sheet and anach to graen sheet INITIATING PROBLEM, ISSUE. OPPOR7UNITV (WHO, WHAT. WHEN, WHERE. WHV): The problem "defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, aRernating free/thaw cycles, service I'rfe limits, chemical additives, eutreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide level and must be addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk conddion would worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusable and subject to increased pedesirian injuries from fatls and possible iitigations. ADVANTAGESIFAPPROVED: The community will benefi[ from this project because it wiil provide safe detect free sidewalks for its many ckizens. The sidewafk contracts are executed by private conttactors, so it folfows that private sector jobs are created as a result of this activity. DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED: Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment. Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the tact up to one-half ihe assessment is City subsidized, it still remains controversial. ��;�.��.��`s �'J- ";N-; �'��"s�� :':,. .__. . . �.... ' � cy ��Y OISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED: �� This option would al�ow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal injury suits, ultimately resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in eventual repairs and/or replacement, as well as claim payouts. TOTALAMWMOFTFlANSACTION$ ��a SS�SO COSTIPEVENUEBUDGETED(CIRCIEONE) YES No FUNDMG SOUBCE g7'�' � x P�'� 97 � S�J� s�-�� pGTViTY NUMBEfl �97-2T729-0784-270] 2 FINANqAL INFORMPTION: (EXPLAIN) a a > C, Cfe 97 = S�,QQO SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATIONS Ward 7 q� ��9 �:��- 5� �'j PROJECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. BUSH AVE. from Stroh Dr. to � � � Weide St. IPTITIATING ACTIOl�: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of two (2} complaints, a petition with one (1) signer and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches and settied panels. ................................................................... !p �/� PROJECT• RECdNSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. EUCLID ST. from Flandrau St. / ( 1`V !% to Kennard St: ITiITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of two (2) complaints, a petition with one (1) signer and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, disintegrated, scaled, settled, cracked and spalled panels. .................................................................. � p�� PROJECT• RECONSTRiJCT SIDEWALS B.S. FOREST ST. from Wilson Ave. 7 to Euciid St. IriITTATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of two complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches and settled panels. ' ................................................................... L,�� f)I'1f� PROJECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALB WITH INTEGRAL CURB N.S. E. V�� SEVENTFi ST. from Ocean St. to Johnson Pkwy. at 1301 E. Seventh St. Only. TNITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of two (2} complaints, a petition with one (1) signer and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDTTIONS: This walk is poured concrete with asphalt patches. setfled and cracked panels. ................................................................... 5� /�/� PROJECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. E. SIXfH ST. from Cypress St, 1 U�� to Eaz1 st. . -2- q�_'�� INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of three (3) complaints and an inspection of the waik. EXTSTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, offgrade, asphalt patches, scaled, settled and cracked panels. ................................................................... ��n PROJECT• RECONSTRi3CT SIDEWALH B.S. E. THIRD ST. from Cypress St. 5 -� to Earl St. Ii�TITIATING ACTION: This order was as public necessity on the basis of one waik. initiated by the Director of Public Works {i) complaint and an inspection of the EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, scaled, settled and cracked panels. ................................................................... �no/K( PROJECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. E. THIRD ST. from Forest St. ► � o to Cypress St. INITIATING ACTIOri: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of two (2) complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: Tkus walk is poured concrete with tree heaves> asphalt patches, disintegrated, scaled, settled and cracked panels. ................................................................... � n� ^� PROJECT: RECOI�ISTRUCT SIDEWALS B.S. E. THIRD ST. from Mendota St. �� '/ to Forest St. I1ITITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of eight (8) complaints and an inspection of the walk.' E%ISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, offgrade, asphalt patches, scaled, setUed and cracked panels. .................................................................. .�-�-r `� � -� a-°I *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTSON RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.45 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the £irst 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of t'he property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100g o£ actual cost estimated to be approximately $9.50 per square foot. The Council of the City o£ Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: t L�a 3 That th=_ =�cz. r=_�a�t ��d t�*=_ s�a _s L.a��'v ana=oved Ki`h n.o alteruativ_s, �-� �� -:� �=r�� v ��___ - ��s= � _�r_. �G`r" _�_ e=_ c�s`scti v rates, �3nanced 3�y assessments and 199"7 Pu3�1iz Tmpravement A�d. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 23rd day of July, 1997, at 4:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays +i Blakey fostrom � ollins �arri s �egard �orton �une �In Favor �Against Adopted by Council: Date a8' \`t Certified Passed by Council Secretary s �,._ � a � Pfayar G ��, CITY OF ST. PAUL COUNCTL FILE NO. '"ta � c FINAL ORDER By File No. 597 2-597079 Voting Ward 7 Ia the Matter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following location(s): 597072 - Both sides Bush Ave from Stroh Drive to Weide St 597073 - Both sides Euclid St from Flandrau St to Kennard St 597074 - Both sides Forest St from Wilson Ave to Euclid St 597075 - With integral curb on the north side of E Seventh St from Ocean St to Johnson Pkwy at 1301 E Seventh only 597076 - Both sides E Sixth St from Cypress St to Earl St 597077 - Both sides E Third St from Cypress St to Ear1 St 597075 - Both sides E Third St from Forest St to Cypress St 597079 -&oth sides E Third St from Mendota St to Forest St � �-�Ia 9 *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDEI3TIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.45 per front foot for a five (5) £oot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot £or a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. Naw construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet o£ new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For'new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. under Preliminary The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereo£ having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers sha11 calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. CQUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays Blakey t/�} s trom t/�� 11ins �iarris Me� ard — AbSEY�� vlcforton Th�e _ Abs�r� S In Favor �Against �- '(�� ses�� Adopted by Council: Date\�a`_�� 1�� \ Certified Passed by Counci3 Secretary By \ a . A �� . z 'tl�� Mayor Publ'ic Hearing Date — 1u1y 23, 1997 RE 5-16-97 OEPAFiTMENT/OFfICE/COUNCIL OATEINITIATED GREEN SHEET NO. ss2?� Public Works Sidewalks 5-2-97 INITIAUDATE INITIAL/OATE CONTACTPEPSONBPHONE �DEPAPTMENTDIRECTOR �CITYCOUNCIL Robert A. Lissick - 266-6121 ��N � CRY ATTORNEY �CITV CLERK NUMBFR FOR MUS7HEONCOUNCILAGENDABY(DATE) (�-1{-9] ROUTING OgUDGETDIRECTOfl FIN.BMGT.SERVICESDIR. Must be in Council Research Office �p MAVOR(OPASSIS7ANn t�Coundt Research b noon Frida 5-23-97 ❑ TOTALMOFSIGNATUREPAGES 1 __ (CIJPALLLOCATONSFORSIGNATURE) � ASSOCIATE � DEPA ACCOUNTANT ACTION RE�UESTED ` r„�`{ Reconstruct Sidewalk 8� Reconstrud Sidewaik With tntegraf Curb in Ward 7(See attachecS list) t� `� '� '� Z� � RECOMMENDA7qNS: Apprwa (A� or Pejee (R2 PERSONAL 3ERVICE COMRACTS MUSt ANSWER THE FO�IOWING QUESTIONS: _PLANNING COMMISSION __CIVIL SENVICE COMMISSION �' ��15 �ES n/ � NOaf wofked Under a CAItt2G[ fOf 1hi3 depaflmen[? CIB COMMITTEE 2. Ha5 Mi5 person�rm eVef beBn a ciry employee? — — YES NO A STAFF 3. Does ihis persoNfirm possess a sltill not normally possessed by arry current ciq — — employee? _DISTRICTCOUNCRtI � _ YES NO SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL OBJECTNE7 �P�ain all yas answers on separeta sheet and anach to graen sheet INITIATING PROBLEM, ISSUE. OPPOR7UNITV (WHO, WHAT. WHEN, WHERE. WHV): The problem "defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, aRernating free/thaw cycles, service I'rfe limits, chemical additives, eutreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide level and must be addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk conddion would worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusable and subject to increased pedesirian injuries from fatls and possible iitigations. ADVANTAGESIFAPPROVED: The community will benefi[ from this project because it wiil provide safe detect free sidewalks for its many ckizens. The sidewafk contracts are executed by private conttactors, so it folfows that private sector jobs are created as a result of this activity. DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED: Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment. Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the tact up to one-half ihe assessment is City subsidized, it still remains controversial. ��;�.��.��`s �'J- ";N-; �'��"s�� :':,. .__. . . �.... ' � cy ��Y OISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED: �� This option would al�ow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal injury suits, ultimately resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in eventual repairs and/or replacement, as well as claim payouts. TOTALAMWMOFTFlANSACTION$ ��a SS�SO COSTIPEVENUEBUDGETED(CIRCIEONE) YES No FUNDMG SOUBCE g7'�' � x P�'� 97 � S�J� s�-�� pGTViTY NUMBEfl �97-2T729-0784-270] 2 FINANqAL INFORMPTION: (EXPLAIN) a a > C, Cfe 97 = S�,QQO SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATIONS Ward 7 q� ��9 �:��- 5� �'j PROJECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. BUSH AVE. from Stroh Dr. to � � � Weide St. IPTITIATING ACTIOl�: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of two (2} complaints, a petition with one (1) signer and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches and settied panels. ................................................................... !p �/� PROJECT• RECdNSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. EUCLID ST. from Flandrau St. / ( 1`V !% to Kennard St: ITiITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of two (2) complaints, a petition with one (1) signer and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, disintegrated, scaled, settled, cracked and spalled panels. .................................................................. � p�� PROJECT• RECONSTRiJCT SIDEWALS B.S. FOREST ST. from Wilson Ave. 7 to Euciid St. IriITTATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of two complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches and settled panels. ' ................................................................... L,�� f)I'1f� PROJECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALB WITH INTEGRAL CURB N.S. E. V�� SEVENTFi ST. from Ocean St. to Johnson Pkwy. at 1301 E. Seventh St. Only. TNITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of two (2} complaints, a petition with one (1) signer and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDTTIONS: This walk is poured concrete with asphalt patches. setfled and cracked panels. ................................................................... 5� /�/� PROJECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. E. SIXfH ST. from Cypress St, 1 U�� to Eaz1 st. . -2- q�_'�� INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of three (3) complaints and an inspection of the waik. EXTSTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, offgrade, asphalt patches, scaled, settled and cracked panels. ................................................................... ��n PROJECT• RECONSTRi3CT SIDEWALH B.S. E. THIRD ST. from Cypress St. 5 -� to Earl St. Ii�TITIATING ACTION: This order was as public necessity on the basis of one waik. initiated by the Director of Public Works {i) complaint and an inspection of the EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, scaled, settled and cracked panels. ................................................................... �no/K( PROJECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. E. THIRD ST. from Forest St. ► � o to Cypress St. INITIATING ACTIOri: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of two (2) complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: Tkus walk is poured concrete with tree heaves> asphalt patches, disintegrated, scaled, settled and cracked panels. ................................................................... � n� ^� PROJECT: RECOI�ISTRUCT SIDEWALS B.S. E. THIRD ST. from Mendota St. �� '/ to Forest St. I1ITITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of eight (8) complaints and an inspection of the walk.' E%ISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, offgrade, asphalt patches, scaled, setUed and cracked panels. .................................................................. .�-�-r `� � -� a-°I *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTSON RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.45 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the £irst 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of t'he property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100g o£ actual cost estimated to be approximately $9.50 per square foot. The Council of the City o£ Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: t L�a 3 That th=_ =�cz. r=_�a�t ��d t�*=_ s�a _s L.a��'v ana=oved Ki`h n.o alteruativ_s, �-� �� -:� �=r�� v ��___ - ��s= � _�r_. �G`r" _�_ e=_ c�s`scti v rates, �3nanced 3�y assessments and 199"7 Pu3�1iz Tmpravement A�d. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 23rd day of July, 1997, at 4:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays +i Blakey fostrom � ollins �arri s �egard �orton �une �In Favor �Against Adopted by Council: Date a8' \`t Certified Passed by Council Secretary s �,._ � a � Pfayar