The URL can be used to link to this page

97-928CITY OF ST. PAUL ` C � COUNCIL FILE NO. �"\ " IOL� � rn `� FIP7AL ORDLR �� BY File No._597066-597071 Voting Ward 6 In the Matter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following location(s): 597066 - South side of E Arlington Ave from Greenbrier St to Walsh St 597067 - Both sides E Geranium Ave from Earl St to Duluth St- 1-�ti�c( o Ve{^ � A��\q4Z C��4,v�;t 597068 - Both sides Greenbrier St from York Ave to Sims Ave M�, 597069 - North side of E Magnolia Ave from Cypress St to Ear1 St 597070 - Both sides Sherwood Ave £rom Edgerton St to Payne Ave 597071 - Both sides Weide St from York Ave to Sims Ave q � • °� � 8� *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement o£ old sidewalk) -$7.45 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100g o£ the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square £oat. under Preliminary order � � - � �- The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, there£ore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays ✓Blakey ✓F3ostrom � llins �rris Megard- Abscv��' v�orton Thune - �l,(2Ser.�' �In Favor �Against ?� -�bs�,�.� Adopted by Council: Date ° d . � `�'� Certified Passed by Council Secretary or Public Hearing;Date — �ARTMENVOFFICE/COUNCIL iblic Works Sidewalks NTACT PERSON & PHONE �bert A Lissick - 266-6121 23, 1997 5-16-97 GREEN SHEET No.� DEPApTMENTDIRECTOR CEN AiTORNEY CITY CAUNCIL � • — a CITYCLERK _ FIN. & MGT. SERVICES Council F IUSTBEONCOUNCILAGENDA6V(DAT� 6-4-97 ROUiING BUDGETDIFECTOfl Must be in Council Research Office � � by noon Fridav 5-23-97 �MAVOR(ORASSISTANT) OTAL / OF SICWITUXE PAGES 1 _(CLIP 4LL LOCATONS FOR SIGNATUpE) � ASSOCIA'fE 1CTION REWESTED Reconstruct Sidewalk in Ward 6(See attached list) � PLANNING COMMISSION _ CNIL SERVICE COMMISSION CB COMMfTTEE STAFF _DISTRICTCOUNCIL.�� _ SUPPoFTS WHICH COUNCIL OBJECTNET WHAT, WHEN, �� PERSONAL S CONTflACTS MUST ANSWEH THE FOLLOWING �UESTIaJS: �� YES �� NO� Worked under a contract for this departmenc? 2. Has this persoMirm ever been a ciry employee? YES NO 3. Does ffiis person/firm possess a skAl not normally possessed by any current ciry emPfoYee? YES NO Exp4ain all yes answers on separete sheat atxl attach to green sheat The problem "defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, alternating freetthaw cycles, service life limits, chemical adddives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide level and must be addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk cond'Rion wouid worsen to a state where i1 would be rendered unusable and subjed to increased pedestiian injuries from iafls and possible litigations. ----� ,�-- The community will benefit from this project because it will provide safe detect tree sidewalks for its many citizens. The sidewatk contracts are executed by private contractors, so it fo�lows thffi private secior jobs are created as a result of this activity. Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment. Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it still remains controversiaL ,� '"��S �;,.°?`��e ��' ;'<� Sa �;;�a€� f,`.rs�` 1 � i�� DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED: This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal injury suiis, ultimately resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in everituaf repairs and/or replacement, as well as claim payouts. TOTAI AMOUM OF TRANSAG?tON $ }� $] L} �O COST/REVENUE BUOGETED (CIRCLE ONE) YES No FUNpING50URCE 97-t1-0667 A. PFA 9J .�+ 557 ACINITYNUMBEA _CQ]��-f3�f34��7ti1� FlNANCIAL INFORMATION: (E%PLAIN) $ } ��'f ,a, �Qa �OOO C, CFS 97 = 50,000 SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATIONS Ward 6 '�" q�-q ar ��O _/_ PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALH S.S. E. ARLINGTON AVE. from f!Y Greenbrier St. to Walsh St. IINITIATING ACTION• as public necessity on walk. This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works the basis of five (5) complaints and an inspection of the E%ISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, disintegrated, scaled and settled panels. 5qh/)/ �1 PROJECT: RECONSTRi3CT SIDEWALH B.S. E. GERArTIUM AVE. from Earl ► !V� / St. to Duluth St. IIVITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of two (2) complaints, a petition with one (1) signer and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, disintegrated, scaled, setUed and cracked panels. ................................................................... 59 '�IN.,4r PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. GREENBRIER ST. from York ( UI� o Ave. to Sims Ave. IATITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches and multi-cracked panels. � qh /� PROJECT: REGONSTRUCT SIDEWALH N.S. E. MAGNOLIA AVE. from f`Qv / Cypress St. to Earl St. IDiITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint, a petition with one {1) signer and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with asphalt patches, disintegrated and scaled panels. ................................................................ -.. 5 Cn PROJECf: RECONSTUCT SIDEWALB B.S. SHERWOOD AVE. from 7(�/ � Edgerton St. to Payne Ave. °t� -9zY � -2- INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of four (4) complaints and an inspection of the walk. ESISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphait patches, scaled and settled panels. ................................................................... 5 p�p/�' PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. WEIDE ST. from York Ave. to � �v � Sims Ave. IDiITTATING ACTION: This order was initiated fiy the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of one {1} complaint, a petition with one (1) signer and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, settled and cracked panels. ................................................................... a�•�a�' CITY OF ST. PAUL COUNCTL FILE N0. ��\ PREL=M=NARX ORDER By ��"/�� a9 File No_ S97a66-547071 Voting Ward_6 In the Matter oP Reconstruction o£ sidewalks at the following location(s): S9'7066 - South side of E Arlington Ave from Greenbrier St to Walsh St 597067 - Both sides E Geranium Ave from Earl St to Duluth St �9706� ^ Heth �i�� x�enb�a.er St £rom York Ave to sima Ave 597069 - North sicte of E Magnolia Ave from Cypress St to Earl St 597070 - Both sides Sherwood Ave from Edgerton St to Payne Ave S97071 - Both sides Weide St from York Ave to Sims Ave • -r•,.:+ i - *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.45 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk_ All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed} - 100$ of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. A11 corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewal7c along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MiJLTI-RESIDENTIAL than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATE5 For new ancl reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said regort, hereby resolves: 1 � 3 That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereo£ is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1997 Public Improvement Aid. That a public hearing be haci on said improvement on the 23rd day of July, 1997, at 4:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays I�Blakey r/BOS trom �/C011ins v�Tarri s r/Pf'egard �Morton �iune 1 In Favor � Against Adopted by Council: Date_C�q Certified Passed by Council Secretary By � �s�� _. Mayor CITY OF ST. PAUL ` C � COUNCIL FILE NO. �"\ " IOL� � rn `� FIP7AL ORDLR �� BY File No._597066-597071 Voting Ward 6 In the Matter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following location(s): 597066 - South side of E Arlington Ave from Greenbrier St to Walsh St 597067 - Both sides E Geranium Ave from Earl St to Duluth St- 1-�ti�c( o Ve{^ � A��\q4Z C��4,v�;t 597068 - Both sides Greenbrier St from York Ave to Sims Ave M�, 597069 - North side of E Magnolia Ave from Cypress St to Ear1 St 597070 - Both sides Sherwood Ave £rom Edgerton St to Payne Ave 597071 - Both sides Weide St from York Ave to Sims Ave q � • °� � 8� *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement o£ old sidewalk) -$7.45 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100g o£ the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square £oat. under Preliminary order � � - � �- The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, there£ore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays ✓Blakey ✓F3ostrom � llins �rris Megard- Abscv��' v�orton Thune - �l,(2Ser.�' �In Favor �Against ?� -�bs�,�.� Adopted by Council: Date ° d . � `�'� Certified Passed by Council Secretary or Public Hearing;Date — �ARTMENVOFFICE/COUNCIL iblic Works Sidewalks NTACT PERSON & PHONE �bert A Lissick - 266-6121 23, 1997 5-16-97 GREEN SHEET No.� DEPApTMENTDIRECTOR CEN AiTORNEY CITY CAUNCIL � • — a CITYCLERK _ FIN. & MGT. SERVICES Council F IUSTBEONCOUNCILAGENDA6V(DAT� 6-4-97 ROUiING BUDGETDIFECTOfl Must be in Council Research Office � � by noon Fridav 5-23-97 �MAVOR(ORASSISTANT) OTAL / OF SICWITUXE PAGES 1 _(CLIP 4LL LOCATONS FOR SIGNATUpE) � ASSOCIA'fE 1CTION REWESTED Reconstruct Sidewalk in Ward 6(See attached list) � PLANNING COMMISSION _ CNIL SERVICE COMMISSION CB COMMfTTEE STAFF _DISTRICTCOUNCIL.�� _ SUPPoFTS WHICH COUNCIL OBJECTNET WHAT, WHEN, �� PERSONAL S CONTflACTS MUST ANSWEH THE FOLLOWING �UESTIaJS: �� YES �� NO� Worked under a contract for this departmenc? 2. Has this persoMirm ever been a ciry employee? YES NO 3. Does ffiis person/firm possess a skAl not normally possessed by any current ciry emPfoYee? YES NO Exp4ain all yes answers on separete sheat atxl attach to green sheat The problem "defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, alternating freetthaw cycles, service life limits, chemical adddives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide level and must be addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk cond'Rion wouid worsen to a state where i1 would be rendered unusable and subjed to increased pedestiian injuries from iafls and possible litigations. ----� ,�-- The community will benefit from this project because it will provide safe detect tree sidewalks for its many citizens. The sidewatk contracts are executed by private contractors, so it fo�lows thffi private secior jobs are created as a result of this activity. Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment. Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it still remains controversiaL ,� '"��S �;,.°?`��e ��' ;'<� Sa �;;�a€� f,`.rs�` 1 � i�� DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED: This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal injury suiis, ultimately resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in everituaf repairs and/or replacement, as well as claim payouts. TOTAI AMOUM OF TRANSAG?tON $ }� $] L} �O COST/REVENUE BUOGETED (CIRCLE ONE) YES No FUNpING50URCE 97-t1-0667 A. PFA 9J .�+ 557 ACINITYNUMBEA _CQ]��-f3�f34��7ti1� FlNANCIAL INFORMATION: (E%PLAIN) $ } ��'f ,a, �Qa �OOO C, CFS 97 = 50,000 SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATIONS Ward 6 '�" q�-q ar ��O _/_ PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALH S.S. E. ARLINGTON AVE. from f!Y Greenbrier St. to Walsh St. IINITIATING ACTION• as public necessity on walk. This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works the basis of five (5) complaints and an inspection of the E%ISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, disintegrated, scaled and settled panels. 5qh/)/ �1 PROJECT: RECONSTRi3CT SIDEWALH B.S. E. GERArTIUM AVE. from Earl ► !V� / St. to Duluth St. IIVITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of two (2) complaints, a petition with one (1) signer and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, disintegrated, scaled, setUed and cracked panels. ................................................................... 59 '�IN.,4r PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. GREENBRIER ST. from York ( UI� o Ave. to Sims Ave. IATITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches and multi-cracked panels. � qh /� PROJECT: REGONSTRUCT SIDEWALH N.S. E. MAGNOLIA AVE. from f`Qv / Cypress St. to Earl St. IDiITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint, a petition with one {1) signer and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with asphalt patches, disintegrated and scaled panels. ................................................................ -.. 5 Cn PROJECf: RECONSTUCT SIDEWALB B.S. SHERWOOD AVE. from 7(�/ � Edgerton St. to Payne Ave. °t� -9zY � -2- INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of four (4) complaints and an inspection of the walk. ESISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphait patches, scaled and settled panels. ................................................................... 5 p�p/�' PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. WEIDE ST. from York Ave. to � �v � Sims Ave. IDiITTATING ACTION: This order was initiated fiy the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of one {1} complaint, a petition with one (1) signer and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, settled and cracked panels. ................................................................... a�•�a�' CITY OF ST. PAUL COUNCTL FILE N0. ��\ PREL=M=NARX ORDER By ��"/�� a9 File No_ S97a66-547071 Voting Ward_6 In the Matter oP Reconstruction o£ sidewalks at the following location(s): S9'7066 - South side of E Arlington Ave from Greenbrier St to Walsh St 597067 - Both sides E Geranium Ave from Earl St to Duluth St �9706� ^ Heth �i�� x�enb�a.er St £rom York Ave to sima Ave 597069 - North sicte of E Magnolia Ave from Cypress St to Earl St 597070 - Both sides Sherwood Ave from Edgerton St to Payne Ave S97071 - Both sides Weide St from York Ave to Sims Ave • -r•,.:+ i - *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.45 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk_ All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed} - 100$ of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. A11 corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewal7c along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MiJLTI-RESIDENTIAL than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATE5 For new ancl reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said regort, hereby resolves: 1 � 3 That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereo£ is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1997 Public Improvement Aid. That a public hearing be haci on said improvement on the 23rd day of July, 1997, at 4:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays I�Blakey r/BOS trom �/C011ins v�Tarri s r/Pf'egard �Morton �iune 1 In Favor � Against Adopted by Council: Date_C�q Certified Passed by Council Secretary By � �s�� _. Mayor CITY OF ST. PAUL ` C � COUNCIL FILE NO. �"\ " IOL� � rn `� FIP7AL ORDLR �� BY File No._597066-597071 Voting Ward 6 In the Matter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following location(s): 597066 - South side of E Arlington Ave from Greenbrier St to Walsh St 597067 - Both sides E Geranium Ave from Earl St to Duluth St- 1-�ti�c( o Ve{^ � A��\q4Z C��4,v�;t 597068 - Both sides Greenbrier St from York Ave to Sims Ave M�, 597069 - North side of E Magnolia Ave from Cypress St to Ear1 St 597070 - Both sides Sherwood Ave £rom Edgerton St to Payne Ave 597071 - Both sides Weide St from York Ave to Sims Ave q � • °� � 8� *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement o£ old sidewalk) -$7.45 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100g o£ the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square £oat. under Preliminary order � � - � �- The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, there£ore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays ✓Blakey ✓F3ostrom � llins �rris Megard- Abscv��' v�orton Thune - �l,(2Ser.�' �In Favor �Against ?� -�bs�,�.� Adopted by Council: Date ° d . � `�'� Certified Passed by Council Secretary or Public Hearing;Date — �ARTMENVOFFICE/COUNCIL iblic Works Sidewalks NTACT PERSON & PHONE �bert A Lissick - 266-6121 23, 1997 5-16-97 GREEN SHEET No.� DEPApTMENTDIRECTOR CEN AiTORNEY CITY CAUNCIL � • — a CITYCLERK _ FIN. & MGT. SERVICES Council F IUSTBEONCOUNCILAGENDA6V(DAT� 6-4-97 ROUiING BUDGETDIFECTOfl Must be in Council Research Office � � by noon Fridav 5-23-97 �MAVOR(ORASSISTANT) OTAL / OF SICWITUXE PAGES 1 _(CLIP 4LL LOCATONS FOR SIGNATUpE) � ASSOCIA'fE 1CTION REWESTED Reconstruct Sidewalk in Ward 6(See attached list) � PLANNING COMMISSION _ CNIL SERVICE COMMISSION CB COMMfTTEE STAFF _DISTRICTCOUNCIL.�� _ SUPPoFTS WHICH COUNCIL OBJECTNET WHAT, WHEN, �� PERSONAL S CONTflACTS MUST ANSWEH THE FOLLOWING �UESTIaJS: �� YES �� NO� Worked under a contract for this departmenc? 2. Has this persoMirm ever been a ciry employee? YES NO 3. Does ffiis person/firm possess a skAl not normally possessed by any current ciry emPfoYee? YES NO Exp4ain all yes answers on separete sheat atxl attach to green sheat The problem "defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, alternating freetthaw cycles, service life limits, chemical adddives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide level and must be addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk cond'Rion wouid worsen to a state where i1 would be rendered unusable and subjed to increased pedestiian injuries from iafls and possible litigations. ----� ,�-- The community will benefit from this project because it will provide safe detect tree sidewalks for its many citizens. The sidewatk contracts are executed by private contractors, so it fo�lows thffi private secior jobs are created as a result of this activity. Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment. Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it still remains controversiaL ,� '"��S �;,.°?`��e ��' ;'<� Sa �;;�a€� f,`.rs�` 1 � i�� DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED: This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal injury suiis, ultimately resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in everituaf repairs and/or replacement, as well as claim payouts. TOTAI AMOUM OF TRANSAG?tON $ }� $] L} �O COST/REVENUE BUOGETED (CIRCLE ONE) YES No FUNpING50URCE 97-t1-0667 A. PFA 9J .�+ 557 ACINITYNUMBEA _CQ]��-f3�f34��7ti1� FlNANCIAL INFORMATION: (E%PLAIN) $ } ��'f ,a, �Qa �OOO C, CFS 97 = 50,000 SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATIONS Ward 6 '�" q�-q ar ��O _/_ PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALH S.S. E. ARLINGTON AVE. from f!Y Greenbrier St. to Walsh St. IINITIATING ACTION• as public necessity on walk. This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works the basis of five (5) complaints and an inspection of the E%ISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, disintegrated, scaled and settled panels. 5qh/)/ �1 PROJECT: RECONSTRi3CT SIDEWALH B.S. E. GERArTIUM AVE. from Earl ► !V� / St. to Duluth St. IIVITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of two (2) complaints, a petition with one (1) signer and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, disintegrated, scaled, setUed and cracked panels. ................................................................... 59 '�IN.,4r PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. GREENBRIER ST. from York ( UI� o Ave. to Sims Ave. IATITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches and multi-cracked panels. � qh /� PROJECT: REGONSTRUCT SIDEWALH N.S. E. MAGNOLIA AVE. from f`Qv / Cypress St. to Earl St. IDiITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint, a petition with one {1) signer and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with asphalt patches, disintegrated and scaled panels. ................................................................ -.. 5 Cn PROJECf: RECONSTUCT SIDEWALB B.S. SHERWOOD AVE. from 7(�/ � Edgerton St. to Payne Ave. °t� -9zY � -2- INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of four (4) complaints and an inspection of the walk. ESISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphait patches, scaled and settled panels. ................................................................... 5 p�p/�' PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. WEIDE ST. from York Ave. to � �v � Sims Ave. IDiITTATING ACTION: This order was initiated fiy the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of one {1} complaint, a petition with one (1) signer and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, settled and cracked panels. ................................................................... a�•�a�' CITY OF ST. PAUL COUNCTL FILE N0. ��\ PREL=M=NARX ORDER By ��"/�� a9 File No_ S97a66-547071 Voting Ward_6 In the Matter oP Reconstruction o£ sidewalks at the following location(s): S9'7066 - South side of E Arlington Ave from Greenbrier St to Walsh St 597067 - Both sides E Geranium Ave from Earl St to Duluth St �9706� ^ Heth �i�� x�enb�a.er St £rom York Ave to sima Ave 597069 - North sicte of E Magnolia Ave from Cypress St to Earl St 597070 - Both sides Sherwood Ave from Edgerton St to Payne Ave S97071 - Both sides Weide St from York Ave to Sims Ave • -r•,.:+ i - *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.45 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk_ All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed} - 100$ of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. A11 corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewal7c along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MiJLTI-RESIDENTIAL than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATE5 For new ancl reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said regort, hereby resolves: 1 � 3 That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereo£ is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1997 Public Improvement Aid. That a public hearing be haci on said improvement on the 23rd day of July, 1997, at 4:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays I�Blakey r/BOS trom �/C011ins v�Tarri s r/Pf'egard �Morton �iune 1 In Favor � Against Adopted by Council: Date_C�q Certified Passed by Council Secretary By � �s�� _. Mayor