The URL can be used to link to this page

97-927CITY OF ST. PAUL COUNCIL FI NO. "l� � � FINAL ORDER By . Fi e No. 597065 Voting Ward 5 Ia the Matter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following location(s): 3ontirsi'cte �t3.�er P�{re. Both sides of Jessie Street from E Maryland Ave to E Brainerd Ave. *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.45 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. Mi7LT2-RESIDENTIAL (Mare than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1�0� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.5� per square foot. under Preliminary order �' l c�--3 approved 1�\ d- `,`�' The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and kas fu11y considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all e�cpenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays �key B�o trom ✓CO11ins �rris t ard— R�Ser�" ✓Morton Thune _ {��S S In Favor DAgainst a AbS�n�-- Adopted by Council: Date\��,1�{� Certified Passed by Counci S etary BY , \ a . T""i�,� 1 � 4'" � � Mayor � Public Hearin Date — Jul 23 1997 RE 5-16-97 DEPARTMENDOFFICE/CAUNCIL DATEINITIATED GREEN SHEET No. �2243 Public Works Sidewalks 5-2-97 INITIAVDATE INITIAL/D CONTACT PEFiSON & PHONE � DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR � CISY fAUNC1L � RobertA.Lissick-266-6121 ^��N cmarroaNEV �CITVCLERK Nue�a�e con MUSTBEONCAUNCILAGENDABY(DATE)(�— —9J HO�UTIR BUIX'aETDIRECTOR �FIN.&MGT.SEflVICESDIP Must be in Council Research Office �MAYOF�OFiASSISTAN� OCounal Research b noo E ' a —2 — TOTAL Y OF SIGNANHE PAGES 1 _ lCW ALL LOCA710NS FOR SIGNASUNE) � ASS6CIATE � �EPARTM UNTAM PCTION REQUES7E0 Y- Reconstruct Sidewalk in Ward 5(See attached list) i° 1►� ( �OIY/ qECOMMENDATIONS: Apprwe (A) or Reject (Fq PERSOPIAL SEflVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS: _ PLANNING COMMISSION _ CNIL SERVICE COMMISSION 1. Has tlii5 peEs Ne woitced under a contrect (or ihis departrnent? Y CIB COMMITTEE 2. Has thispe rsonnrm ever been a city employee? — — YES NO 1� S7AFF 3. Does this persoNfirm possess a skdl not normalty possessed by any wrrent city — — employee? OISTRICTCAUNGIL�� _. YES NO J Explain all yes answen on saperffie sheet aM attaeh to green shaet SUPPOflTS VrtiICH COUNpL O&IECTNE? INITIATING PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPORNNITY (WHO, WHAT, WHEN, WHERE. WHY): The problem "defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, alternating free/thaw cycles, service life limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide level and must be addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it wouid be rendered unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigatio�s. ADVANTAGESIFAPPROVED: The community will benefit from this project because it will provide safe detect free sidewalks for its many citizens. The sidewalk contracts are executed by private contractors, so i[ follows that private sector jobs are created as a result of this activity. ce DISADVANTAGES IF APPflOVED: Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessme�t. Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it siill remainscontroversial. r^^ :�;i " -""�° ��""`;"" �,:�y,__..,. ... . ;�. � ,._ .. �, �, i�s�T DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED: This option would allow the iMrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, wi!I generate more personal injury suits, ultimately resuking in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in eventual repairs and/or replacement, as weA as claim payouts. TOTALAMWMOFTHANSACfIONE , �,OGZ,GO COST/REVENUEBUDGE7ED(CIqCLEONE) YES no FUNDINGSWRCE 97° A p« T R� $ J�Ir AqTV1TYNUMBER C r�T 2 c�Q Hlt FINANCIAL fNFORMATION: (EXPLA}N) S� AS ! ^. 3OO �OOO C CP8 97 = 50,000 - SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATION q� _ qa� Ward 5 5�4� PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALH B.S. JESSIE ST. from E. Maryland Ave.to E. Brainerd Ave. IARTIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of three (3) complaints, a petition with one (1) signer and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves. asphalt patches, settled and cracked panels. a�� 9�? CITY OF ST. PAUL COUNCIL FILE N0. �� PRELIMINARY ORUER BY � / � Fi No. 597065 Voting Ward_5 In the Matter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following location(s): Both sides Jessie St from E Maryland Ave to E Brainerd Ave. *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTIOI3 RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structure5) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.45 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet o£ new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(MOre than three family structuresj, NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1997 Public Improvement Aid. 2 3 That a public hearing be had on said improvement on tfie 23rd day of July, 1997, at 4:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays �lakey '�ostrom �ollins ✓FIarr i s vPi�egard ✓forton �I�une Z In Favor �Against Adopted by Council: Date��i`��' \_�� \ Certified Passed by Council Secretary BY ��a ' � .�J`�� .-._ Mayor CITY OF ST. PAUL COUNCIL FI NO. "l� � � FINAL ORDER By . Fi e No. 597065 Voting Ward 5 Ia the Matter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following location(s): 3ontirsi'cte �t3.�er P�{re. Both sides of Jessie Street from E Maryland Ave to E Brainerd Ave. *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.45 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. Mi7LT2-RESIDENTIAL (Mare than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1�0� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.5� per square foot. under Preliminary order �' l c�--3 approved 1�\ d- `,`�' The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and kas fu11y considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all e�cpenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays �key B�o trom ✓CO11ins �rris t ard— R�Ser�" ✓Morton Thune _ {��S S In Favor DAgainst a AbS�n�-- Adopted by Council: Date\��,1�{� Certified Passed by Counci S etary BY , \ a . T""i�,� 1 � 4'" � � Mayor � Public Hearin Date — Jul 23 1997 RE 5-16-97 DEPARTMENDOFFICE/CAUNCIL DATEINITIATED GREEN SHEET No. �2243 Public Works Sidewalks 5-2-97 INITIAVDATE INITIAL/D CONTACT PEFiSON & PHONE � DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR � CISY fAUNC1L � RobertA.Lissick-266-6121 ^��N cmarroaNEV �CITVCLERK Nue�a�e con MUSTBEONCAUNCILAGENDABY(DATE)(�— —9J HO�UTIR BUIX'aETDIRECTOR �FIN.&MGT.SEflVICESDIP Must be in Council Research Office �MAYOF�OFiASSISTAN� OCounal Research b noo E ' a —2 — TOTAL Y OF SIGNANHE PAGES 1 _ lCW ALL LOCA710NS FOR SIGNASUNE) � ASS6CIATE � �EPARTM UNTAM PCTION REQUES7E0 Y- Reconstruct Sidewalk in Ward 5(See attached list) i° 1►� ( �OIY/ qECOMMENDATIONS: Apprwe (A) or Reject (Fq PERSOPIAL SEflVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS: _ PLANNING COMMISSION _ CNIL SERVICE COMMISSION 1. Has tlii5 peEs Ne woitced under a contrect (or ihis departrnent? Y CIB COMMITTEE 2. Has thispe rsonnrm ever been a city employee? — — YES NO 1� S7AFF 3. Does this persoNfirm possess a skdl not normalty possessed by any wrrent city — — employee? OISTRICTCAUNGIL�� _. YES NO J Explain all yes answen on saperffie sheet aM attaeh to green shaet SUPPOflTS VrtiICH COUNpL O&IECTNE? INITIATING PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPORNNITY (WHO, WHAT, WHEN, WHERE. WHY): The problem "defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, alternating free/thaw cycles, service life limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide level and must be addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it wouid be rendered unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigatio�s. ADVANTAGESIFAPPROVED: The community will benefit from this project because it will provide safe detect free sidewalks for its many citizens. The sidewalk contracts are executed by private contractors, so i[ follows that private sector jobs are created as a result of this activity. ce DISADVANTAGES IF APPflOVED: Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessme�t. Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it siill remainscontroversial. r^^ :�;i " -""�° ��""`;"" �,:�y,__..,. ... . ;�. � ,._ .. �, �, i�s�T DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED: This option would allow the iMrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, wi!I generate more personal injury suits, ultimately resuking in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in eventual repairs and/or replacement, as weA as claim payouts. TOTALAMWMOFTHANSACfIONE , �,OGZ,GO COST/REVENUEBUDGE7ED(CIqCLEONE) YES no FUNDINGSWRCE 97° A p« T R� $ J�Ir AqTV1TYNUMBER C r�T 2 c�Q Hlt FINANCIAL fNFORMATION: (EXPLA}N) S� AS ! ^. 3OO �OOO C CP8 97 = 50,000 - SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATION q� _ qa� Ward 5 5�4� PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALH B.S. JESSIE ST. from E. Maryland Ave.to E. Brainerd Ave. IARTIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of three (3) complaints, a petition with one (1) signer and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves. asphalt patches, settled and cracked panels. a�� 9�? CITY OF ST. PAUL COUNCIL FILE N0. �� PRELIMINARY ORUER BY � / � Fi No. 597065 Voting Ward_5 In the Matter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following location(s): Both sides Jessie St from E Maryland Ave to E Brainerd Ave. *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTIOI3 RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structure5) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.45 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet o£ new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(MOre than three family structuresj, NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1997 Public Improvement Aid. 2 3 That a public hearing be had on said improvement on tfie 23rd day of July, 1997, at 4:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays �lakey '�ostrom �ollins ✓FIarr i s vPi�egard ✓forton �I�une Z In Favor �Against Adopted by Council: Date��i`��' \_�� \ Certified Passed by Council Secretary BY ��a ' � .�J`�� .-._ Mayor CITY OF ST. PAUL COUNCIL FI NO. "l� � � FINAL ORDER By . Fi e No. 597065 Voting Ward 5 Ia the Matter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following location(s): 3ontirsi'cte �t3.�er P�{re. Both sides of Jessie Street from E Maryland Ave to E Brainerd Ave. *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.45 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. Mi7LT2-RESIDENTIAL (Mare than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1�0� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.5� per square foot. under Preliminary order �' l c�--3 approved 1�\ d- `,`�' The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and kas fu11y considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all e�cpenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays �key B�o trom ✓CO11ins �rris t ard— R�Ser�" ✓Morton Thune _ {��S S In Favor DAgainst a AbS�n�-- Adopted by Council: Date\��,1�{� Certified Passed by Counci S etary BY , \ a . T""i�,� 1 � 4'" � � Mayor � Public Hearin Date — Jul 23 1997 RE 5-16-97 DEPARTMENDOFFICE/CAUNCIL DATEINITIATED GREEN SHEET No. �2243 Public Works Sidewalks 5-2-97 INITIAVDATE INITIAL/D CONTACT PEFiSON & PHONE � DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR � CISY fAUNC1L � RobertA.Lissick-266-6121 ^��N cmarroaNEV �CITVCLERK Nue�a�e con MUSTBEONCAUNCILAGENDABY(DATE)(�— —9J HO�UTIR BUIX'aETDIRECTOR �FIN.&MGT.SEflVICESDIP Must be in Council Research Office �MAYOF�OFiASSISTAN� OCounal Research b noo E ' a —2 — TOTAL Y OF SIGNANHE PAGES 1 _ lCW ALL LOCA710NS FOR SIGNASUNE) � ASS6CIATE � �EPARTM UNTAM PCTION REQUES7E0 Y- Reconstruct Sidewalk in Ward 5(See attached list) i° 1►� ( �OIY/ qECOMMENDATIONS: Apprwe (A) or Reject (Fq PERSOPIAL SEflVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS: _ PLANNING COMMISSION _ CNIL SERVICE COMMISSION 1. Has tlii5 peEs Ne woitced under a contrect (or ihis departrnent? Y CIB COMMITTEE 2. Has thispe rsonnrm ever been a city employee? — — YES NO 1� S7AFF 3. Does this persoNfirm possess a skdl not normalty possessed by any wrrent city — — employee? OISTRICTCAUNGIL�� _. YES NO J Explain all yes answen on saperffie sheet aM attaeh to green shaet SUPPOflTS VrtiICH COUNpL O&IECTNE? INITIATING PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPORNNITY (WHO, WHAT, WHEN, WHERE. WHY): The problem "defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, alternating free/thaw cycles, service life limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide level and must be addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it wouid be rendered unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigatio�s. ADVANTAGESIFAPPROVED: The community will benefit from this project because it will provide safe detect free sidewalks for its many citizens. The sidewalk contracts are executed by private contractors, so i[ follows that private sector jobs are created as a result of this activity. ce DISADVANTAGES IF APPflOVED: Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessme�t. Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it siill remainscontroversial. r^^ :�;i " -""�° ��""`;"" �,:�y,__..,. ... . ;�. � ,._ .. �, �, i�s�T DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED: This option would allow the iMrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, wi!I generate more personal injury suits, ultimately resuking in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in eventual repairs and/or replacement, as weA as claim payouts. TOTALAMWMOFTHANSACfIONE , �,OGZ,GO COST/REVENUEBUDGE7ED(CIqCLEONE) YES no FUNDINGSWRCE 97° A p« T R� $ J�Ir AqTV1TYNUMBER C r�T 2 c�Q Hlt FINANCIAL fNFORMATION: (EXPLA}N) S� AS ! ^. 3OO �OOO C CP8 97 = 50,000 - SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATION q� _ qa� Ward 5 5�4� PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALH B.S. JESSIE ST. from E. Maryland Ave.to E. Brainerd Ave. IARTIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of three (3) complaints, a petition with one (1) signer and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves. asphalt patches, settled and cracked panels. a�� 9�? CITY OF ST. PAUL COUNCIL FILE N0. �� PRELIMINARY ORUER BY � / � Fi No. 597065 Voting Ward_5 In the Matter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following location(s): Both sides Jessie St from E Maryland Ave to E Brainerd Ave. *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTIOI3 RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structure5) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.45 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet o£ new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(MOre than three family structuresj, NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1997 Public Improvement Aid. 2 3 That a public hearing be had on said improvement on tfie 23rd day of July, 1997, at 4:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays �lakey '�ostrom �ollins ✓FIarr i s vPi�egard ✓forton �I�une Z In Favor �Against Adopted by Council: Date��i`��' \_�� \ Certified Passed by Council Secretary BY ��a ' � .�J`�� .-._ Mayor