97-926CITY OF ST. PAUL COUNCIL FILE NO. l� � 1a� y
FINAL ORDER By -- �=<(��,���` - �i � �/
Fi1e No. 597064 ��
Voting Ward 4
In the Matter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following location(s):
South side of W Hoyt Ave from N Albert St to N Snelling Ave.
*ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES
RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures)
Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.45 per front foot for a five (5)
foot wide walk and S8•94 per front foot £or a six (6) foot wide
walk_ All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New coastruction
(where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be
approximately $3.33 per square foot.
A11 corner residential properties wi11 receive a credit up to the first 150
feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of
the property.
MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES
For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be
approximately $4.50 per square foot.
under Preliminary
The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the
above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City
Charter; and
WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations
pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now,
therefore, be it
RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the
above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed
and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it
FURTFiER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City
officers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to
the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter.
COUNCILPERSONS
Yeas Nays
1�lakey
�/�ostrom
�ollins
i/�arri s
Megard— l�bsey�'�
✓l�rton
Thune _ �bse v.
Adopted by Council: Date �- l`g�
Certified Passed by Council Secretary
� In Favor By a- , n
�Against �'
� Mayor
Ak�sC,.�-
' Public Aearing Date - Suly 23, 1997 RE 5-16-47 qr �� , � q
DEPAflTMENT/OFFICFICOUNCIL DATEINITIATED GREEN SHEET NO. �`�-`�-�--
Public Works Sidewalks $ -2 ' 97 INITIAL/DA7E N
CONTACTPEflSON&PHONE �DEPARTMENTDIRECTOR �CITVCOUNCIL 1 ° �S
RobertA.lissick-266-6121 A�C'N �CffYATTORNEY �GINCLERK
NUMBFR FOR
MUSTBEONCAUNCILAGENDABY(OATE) (—(}—CJ] NOU77NG Ogpp(�E7DIFECTOfl �FlN.&MGT.SERVICESDIR.
Must be in Council Researcti Office �R MAVORiORASSISTA1Jn 10 Counal Research
b noon Frida 5-23-97 �
TOTALYOFSI6NATUREPAGES ]. _ (C(1PALLLOCA710NSFORSIGNATUflE) ASSOCIATE �DEPAR AIACCAUNTAM
ACTIONRE�UESTEO ��5- y
Reconstruct Sidewalk in Ward 4(See attached list)
Flt.� �
RECOMMENDA7iONS: eppmre {A) w Rajea (fi) pEpSpNAL SEqVICE CONTHACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWIPlG QUESTIONS:
PIANNING COMMISSfON _CNIL SERVICE COMMISSION 1. Has this peES Nfi Ne�ver vrorked under a contract for this deparbnent?
Y
a8 cOMM17iEE 2. Has ihis persoNfirm ever been a ciry employee?
— — YES NO
A S7AFF 3, Dces this person/firm possess a skiil not normally possessed by any cunent ciry
— 1 � — emPloyee?
DISTRICiCOUNCII�'� YES NO
SUPPORTS WHIGi COUNCtI OBJEG7NE'+ ExP�ain all yes an5wers on sepsrate sheet a� atWch to greon shee[
w
INITIATING PROBLEM. ISSUE, OPPORTUNITY (WHO, WHAT, WHEN, WHERE, WH1�:
The problem "deEective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, alternating freefthaw cycles,
service I'rfe limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide level and must be
addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be
rendered unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations.
ADVANTAGE5IFAPPROVED:
The community will benefit from this project because it will provide safe detect free sidewalks for its many citizens. The sidewalk
contracts are executed by private contractors, so it follows that private sector jobs are created as a result of this activily.
DISADVANTAOES IF APPROVED:
Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment.
Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despde the fact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it still
remains controversial. •
ca�s ''R . ,- �r:-�. (�*�„s�a.-.
_ . . . z�r'
��,,;i' .9. ; 2'�9
DiSADVANiAGESIF NOT APPA4VED:
..�r_,z,", �
This option would aAow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn; Will generate more personatTnJury suits,
ultimately resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in eventual repairs and/or replacement, as well as claim payouts.
TOTALAMWMOFTRANSACfION$ 22 662,90 COST/pEVENUEBUDGETED(CIpCLEONE) YES No
FUNDINGSOURCE 91^���66] (j PFA 97 - 557 .p�0 __ AqTVITYNUMBEH C97��2T729-0784- i
FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (EXPLAIN) B� A$f = 3OO „OQQ
C. CFB 97 = 50;000
q�-9z�
L��.+-�.r
SUNIMARY OF ENGINEERTNG RECOMMENDATION
Ward 4
���� PROJECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALH S.S. W. HOYT AVE. from N. Albert
St. to N. Snelling Ave.
INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public
Works as public necessity on the basis of three (3} complaints, a petition with
one (1) signer and an inspection of the walk.
EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves,
asphalt patches, disintegrated, scaled and settled panels.
...................................................................
'�t'I - 9'�G
CITY OF ST. PAUI, COUNCIL FILE NO. �b� �
PRELIMINARY ORDER By �C..4-�c'A (��-- !/.LQiK/T/(iLC i `�
File No. 597064 �
Voting Ward_4
In the Matter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the £ollowing location(s):
5outh side o£ W Hoyt Ave from I3 Albert St to I3 Snelling Ave.
*ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES
RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures)
Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.45 per £ront foot for a
five (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide
walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction
(where no walk existed) - 100$ of the actual cost estimated to be
approximately $3.33 per square foot.
All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the £irst 150
feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" oE
the property.
MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures}, NON-RE5IDENTIAL RATES
For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100g o£ actual cost estimated to be
approximately $4.50 per square foot.
The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon
the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves:
1
E
3
That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives,
and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction
rates, financed by assessments and 1997 Public Improvement Aid.
That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 23rd day of Suly, 1997,
at 4:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House
Building in the City of Saint Paul.
That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner
provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of
the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated.
COUNCILPERSONS
Yeas Nays
Blakey
�ostrom
Collins
�rris
1/fegard
(/irorton
�'I'une
! In Favor
� Against
Adopted by Council: Date a �`1�7
/
Certified Passed by Council Secretary
By '�� a �,��� ,
Mayor
CITY OF ST. PAUL COUNCIL FILE NO. l� � 1a� y
FINAL ORDER By -- �=<(��,���` - �i � �/
Fi1e No. 597064 ��
Voting Ward 4
In the Matter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following location(s):
South side of W Hoyt Ave from N Albert St to N Snelling Ave.
*ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES
RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures)
Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.45 per front foot for a five (5)
foot wide walk and S8•94 per front foot £or a six (6) foot wide
walk_ All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New coastruction
(where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be
approximately $3.33 per square foot.
A11 corner residential properties wi11 receive a credit up to the first 150
feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of
the property.
MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES
For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be
approximately $4.50 per square foot.
under Preliminary
The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the
above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City
Charter; and
WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations
pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now,
therefore, be it
RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the
above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed
and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it
FURTFiER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City
officers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to
the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter.
COUNCILPERSONS
Yeas Nays
1�lakey
�/�ostrom
�ollins
i/�arri s
Megard— l�bsey�'�
✓l�rton
Thune _ �bse v.
Adopted by Council: Date �- l`g�
Certified Passed by Council Secretary
� In Favor By a- , n
�Against �'
� Mayor
Ak�sC,.�-
' Public Aearing Date - Suly 23, 1997 RE 5-16-47 qr �� , � q
DEPAflTMENT/OFFICFICOUNCIL DATEINITIATED GREEN SHEET NO. �`�-`�-�--
Public Works Sidewalks $ -2 ' 97 INITIAL/DA7E N
CONTACTPEflSON&PHONE �DEPARTMENTDIRECTOR �CITVCOUNCIL 1 ° �S
RobertA.lissick-266-6121 A�C'N �CffYATTORNEY �GINCLERK
NUMBFR FOR
MUSTBEONCAUNCILAGENDABY(OATE) (—(}—CJ] NOU77NG Ogpp(�E7DIFECTOfl �FlN.&MGT.SERVICESDIR.
Must be in Council Researcti Office �R MAVORiORASSISTA1Jn 10 Counal Research
b noon Frida 5-23-97 �
TOTALYOFSI6NATUREPAGES ]. _ (C(1PALLLOCA710NSFORSIGNATUflE) ASSOCIATE �DEPAR AIACCAUNTAM
ACTIONRE�UESTEO ��5- y
Reconstruct Sidewalk in Ward 4(See attached list)
Flt.� �
RECOMMENDA7iONS: eppmre {A) w Rajea (fi) pEpSpNAL SEqVICE CONTHACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWIPlG QUESTIONS:
PIANNING COMMISSfON _CNIL SERVICE COMMISSION 1. Has this peES Nfi Ne�ver vrorked under a contract for this deparbnent?
Y
a8 cOMM17iEE 2. Has ihis persoNfirm ever been a ciry employee?
— — YES NO
A S7AFF 3, Dces this person/firm possess a skiil not normally possessed by any cunent ciry
— 1 � — emPloyee?
DISTRICiCOUNCII�'� YES NO
SUPPORTS WHIGi COUNCtI OBJEG7NE'+ ExP�ain all yes an5wers on sepsrate sheet a� atWch to greon shee[
w
INITIATING PROBLEM. ISSUE, OPPORTUNITY (WHO, WHAT, WHEN, WHERE, WH1�:
The problem "deEective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, alternating freefthaw cycles,
service I'rfe limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide level and must be
addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be
rendered unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations.
ADVANTAGE5IFAPPROVED:
The community will benefit from this project because it will provide safe detect free sidewalks for its many citizens. The sidewalk
contracts are executed by private contractors, so it follows that private sector jobs are created as a result of this activily.
DISADVANTAOES IF APPROVED:
Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment.
Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despde the fact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it still
remains controversial. •
ca�s ''R . ,- �r:-�. (�*�„s�a.-.
_ . . . z�r'
��,,;i' .9. ; 2'�9
DiSADVANiAGESIF NOT APPA4VED:
..�r_,z,", �
This option would aAow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn; Will generate more personatTnJury suits,
ultimately resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in eventual repairs and/or replacement, as well as claim payouts.
TOTALAMWMOFTRANSACfION$ 22 662,90 COST/pEVENUEBUDGETED(CIpCLEONE) YES No
FUNDINGSOURCE 91^���66] (j PFA 97 - 557 .p�0 __ AqTVITYNUMBEH C97��2T729-0784- i
FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (EXPLAIN) B� A$f = 3OO „OQQ
C. CFB 97 = 50;000
q�-9z�
L��.+-�.r
SUNIMARY OF ENGINEERTNG RECOMMENDATION
Ward 4
���� PROJECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALH S.S. W. HOYT AVE. from N. Albert
St. to N. Snelling Ave.
INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public
Works as public necessity on the basis of three (3} complaints, a petition with
one (1) signer and an inspection of the walk.
EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves,
asphalt patches, disintegrated, scaled and settled panels.
...................................................................
'�t'I - 9'�G
CITY OF ST. PAUI, COUNCIL FILE NO. �b� �
PRELIMINARY ORDER By �C..4-�c'A (��-- !/.LQiK/T/(iLC i `�
File No. 597064 �
Voting Ward_4
In the Matter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the £ollowing location(s):
5outh side o£ W Hoyt Ave from I3 Albert St to I3 Snelling Ave.
*ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES
RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures)
Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.45 per £ront foot for a
five (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide
walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction
(where no walk existed) - 100$ of the actual cost estimated to be
approximately $3.33 per square foot.
All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the £irst 150
feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" oE
the property.
MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures}, NON-RE5IDENTIAL RATES
For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100g o£ actual cost estimated to be
approximately $4.50 per square foot.
The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon
the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves:
1
E
3
That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives,
and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction
rates, financed by assessments and 1997 Public Improvement Aid.
That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 23rd day of Suly, 1997,
at 4:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House
Building in the City of Saint Paul.
That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner
provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of
the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated.
COUNCILPERSONS
Yeas Nays
Blakey
�ostrom
Collins
�rris
1/fegard
(/irorton
�'I'une
! In Favor
� Against
Adopted by Council: Date a �`1�7
/
Certified Passed by Council Secretary
By '�� a �,��� ,
Mayor
CITY OF ST. PAUL COUNCIL FILE NO. l� � 1a� y
FINAL ORDER By -- �=<(��,���` - �i � �/
Fi1e No. 597064 ��
Voting Ward 4
In the Matter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following location(s):
South side of W Hoyt Ave from N Albert St to N Snelling Ave.
*ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES
RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures)
Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.45 per front foot for a five (5)
foot wide walk and S8•94 per front foot £or a six (6) foot wide
walk_ All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New coastruction
(where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be
approximately $3.33 per square foot.
A11 corner residential properties wi11 receive a credit up to the first 150
feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of
the property.
MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES
For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be
approximately $4.50 per square foot.
under Preliminary
The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the
above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City
Charter; and
WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations
pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now,
therefore, be it
RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the
above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed
and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it
FURTFiER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City
officers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to
the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter.
COUNCILPERSONS
Yeas Nays
1�lakey
�/�ostrom
�ollins
i/�arri s
Megard— l�bsey�'�
✓l�rton
Thune _ �bse v.
Adopted by Council: Date �- l`g�
Certified Passed by Council Secretary
� In Favor By a- , n
�Against �'
� Mayor
Ak�sC,.�-
' Public Aearing Date - Suly 23, 1997 RE 5-16-47 qr �� , � q
DEPAflTMENT/OFFICFICOUNCIL DATEINITIATED GREEN SHEET NO. �`�-`�-�--
Public Works Sidewalks $ -2 ' 97 INITIAL/DA7E N
CONTACTPEflSON&PHONE �DEPARTMENTDIRECTOR �CITVCOUNCIL 1 ° �S
RobertA.lissick-266-6121 A�C'N �CffYATTORNEY �GINCLERK
NUMBFR FOR
MUSTBEONCAUNCILAGENDABY(OATE) (—(}—CJ] NOU77NG Ogpp(�E7DIFECTOfl �FlN.&MGT.SERVICESDIR.
Must be in Council Researcti Office �R MAVORiORASSISTA1Jn 10 Counal Research
b noon Frida 5-23-97 �
TOTALYOFSI6NATUREPAGES ]. _ (C(1PALLLOCA710NSFORSIGNATUflE) ASSOCIATE �DEPAR AIACCAUNTAM
ACTIONRE�UESTEO ��5- y
Reconstruct Sidewalk in Ward 4(See attached list)
Flt.� �
RECOMMENDA7iONS: eppmre {A) w Rajea (fi) pEpSpNAL SEqVICE CONTHACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWIPlG QUESTIONS:
PIANNING COMMISSfON _CNIL SERVICE COMMISSION 1. Has this peES Nfi Ne�ver vrorked under a contract for this deparbnent?
Y
a8 cOMM17iEE 2. Has ihis persoNfirm ever been a ciry employee?
— — YES NO
A S7AFF 3, Dces this person/firm possess a skiil not normally possessed by any cunent ciry
— 1 � — emPloyee?
DISTRICiCOUNCII�'� YES NO
SUPPORTS WHIGi COUNCtI OBJEG7NE'+ ExP�ain all yes an5wers on sepsrate sheet a� atWch to greon shee[
w
INITIATING PROBLEM. ISSUE, OPPORTUNITY (WHO, WHAT, WHEN, WHERE, WH1�:
The problem "deEective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, alternating freefthaw cycles,
service I'rfe limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide level and must be
addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be
rendered unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations.
ADVANTAGE5IFAPPROVED:
The community will benefit from this project because it will provide safe detect free sidewalks for its many citizens. The sidewalk
contracts are executed by private contractors, so it follows that private sector jobs are created as a result of this activily.
DISADVANTAOES IF APPROVED:
Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment.
Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despde the fact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it still
remains controversial. •
ca�s ''R . ,- �r:-�. (�*�„s�a.-.
_ . . . z�r'
��,,;i' .9. ; 2'�9
DiSADVANiAGESIF NOT APPA4VED:
..�r_,z,", �
This option would aAow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn; Will generate more personatTnJury suits,
ultimately resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in eventual repairs and/or replacement, as well as claim payouts.
TOTALAMWMOFTRANSACfION$ 22 662,90 COST/pEVENUEBUDGETED(CIpCLEONE) YES No
FUNDINGSOURCE 91^���66] (j PFA 97 - 557 .p�0 __ AqTVITYNUMBEH C97��2T729-0784- i
FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (EXPLAIN) B� A$f = 3OO „OQQ
C. CFB 97 = 50;000
q�-9z�
L��.+-�.r
SUNIMARY OF ENGINEERTNG RECOMMENDATION
Ward 4
���� PROJECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALH S.S. W. HOYT AVE. from N. Albert
St. to N. Snelling Ave.
INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public
Works as public necessity on the basis of three (3} complaints, a petition with
one (1) signer and an inspection of the walk.
EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves,
asphalt patches, disintegrated, scaled and settled panels.
...................................................................
'�t'I - 9'�G
CITY OF ST. PAUI, COUNCIL FILE NO. �b� �
PRELIMINARY ORDER By �C..4-�c'A (��-- !/.LQiK/T/(iLC i `�
File No. 597064 �
Voting Ward_4
In the Matter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the £ollowing location(s):
5outh side o£ W Hoyt Ave from I3 Albert St to I3 Snelling Ave.
*ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES
RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures)
Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.45 per £ront foot for a
five (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide
walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction
(where no walk existed) - 100$ of the actual cost estimated to be
approximately $3.33 per square foot.
All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the £irst 150
feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" oE
the property.
MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures}, NON-RE5IDENTIAL RATES
For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100g o£ actual cost estimated to be
approximately $4.50 per square foot.
The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon
the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves:
1
E
3
That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives,
and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction
rates, financed by assessments and 1997 Public Improvement Aid.
That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 23rd day of Suly, 1997,
at 4:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House
Building in the City of Saint Paul.
That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner
provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of
the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated.
COUNCILPERSONS
Yeas Nays
Blakey
�ostrom
Collins
�rris
1/fegard
(/irorton
�'I'une
! In Favor
� Against
Adopted by Council: Date a �`1�7
/
Certified Passed by Council Secretary
By '�� a �,��� ,
Mayor