The URL can be used to link to this page

97-818CITY OF ST. PAUL 0�� l N A L COUNCIL FILE N - l�� V I a �� FINAL ORDER By ///� � File � o. S 7063 Voting Ward 6 Ia the Matter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following location(s): 597063 - North side of E Hawthorne Ave from Walsh St to Weide St *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstructioa (replacement of o1d sidewalk) -$7.45 per front foot for a five (5) £oot wide walk and $8.94 per front Eoot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the £irst 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MtTLTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructecl sidewalk; 10�� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. under Preliminary � J The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereo£ having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directecl and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays Blakey v�ostrom �rris �gard �rton Thune j}b�ey�j..- �o\\: t� S Adopted by Council: Date��,�q�] � � � l Certified Passed by Council �ecretary �In Favor �Against � Rbs�r-'c or 'Public Hearing Date — June 25, 1997 RE 4-18-97 q 7- DEPARTMENT/OFFICFICOUNCIL DA7EINITIATED GREEN SHEET Ho. 32239 �� Public Works Sidewalks 4-��-97 INITIAUDATE INITUIVDATE CONTACTPERSON&PHONE ^pEppp7MENTDIRECT�R ❑CflYCOUNCII Robert A. Lissick - 266-6121 N �� u C�iY ATTORNEY � CfTY CLERK MUSTBEOtiWl1NC{LAGENDABV(DA7E) �'j_�_c3 f10Ui1NG �g�7pGE7DIRECTOR �FIN.BMGT.SERVICESDIR Must be in Council Research Office � MAYOR(OftASSISTMiT) � Counai Research b noon Frida 4-25-97 ❑ SO7AL r OF SN3NANRE PAGES ]. _(CUP ALL LOCAi10NS WR SIGNAN(tq � ASSOCW7E � OEP TALACCOU ANT ACTION qEWES7ED j Reconstruc[ Sidewalk in Ward 6(See attached list) � �- q 3 RECOMMENDAT70NS: Approva (!q or fleject (R) pEpr�pNp� SEpyICE CpMppCTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUEST10N5: _ P4ANNING COMMISSION _ CIVIL SEFNICE COMMISSION 1. lias ihA4 [�Y�oNF NQer vrorked under a contrect fir this departrnent? CIB COtAMiREE 2. Has mis per�rtn ever been a ciry employee? — — YES NO A SiAFF 3. Does ll�is pe/soNfirm possess a skiit not normaly pwsessed by any current ciry employee? _o157RICiCOUNCIL 5 _ YES NO SUPPORTS YMICN CWNCIL OBJEC7NE4 �Wain all yes anawers on eaparete sheet and aHaeh to green sheet INITIATIN ROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPORTUNffY (WHO, VhiAT, WHEN. WHERE. WHY): The problem "defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, aRernating free/thaw cycfes, service I'rfe limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide level and musl be addressed and crorrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk conddion would worsen to s state where it would be rendered unusabie and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible Iftigations. ADVANTAGESIF APAROVED: The community will benefit from this project because it will provide safe detect frea sidewalks for its many citizens. The sidewalk contracts are executed by private contractors, so it f411ows that private sector jo6s aze created as a resuR of this activity. DISADVAMAGES IF APPROVED: HistaricaUy, the sidewalk reconsuuctions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment. Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it still remains controversial. �.., � `,';.,� ,.,,�,... j ,�.�g,.F: Y - rSJ E? iM,;.... ieswn�:�-: , � . -- � � �'-�`� � � �� I'�t ra . DISADVANTAGES IF NOTAPPROVED: This option would ailow the ir�frastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal injury suits, ukimately resulting in the expendituse of larger doNar amouMs in eventual repairs andlor replacement, as well as claim payouts. TOSALAtdWNTOFTRANSACTIONS 3.G�+J.S2 COST/REVENUEBUDGETED(CIRCLEONEI YE No FUNDMGSOURCE 9�^3h^OC�E1] A.. P�{1 S� _�S��OOO ACRVITYNUMBER G ^ZT Z-0� S�#–Z O 2 FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (EXPLAIN) $ t AST = 3OO F OOO G, Ct6 97 � 50,O�Q SUNIMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATION 0+�� J � Ward 6 PR[LiF[`T utr_[,[�NSTRUCT SIDEWAI.B N.S E. HAWTHORNE AVE. from Walsh St. to Weide St. jq nil �?, IPiITIATII�iG ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public w J Works as public necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint and an inspection of the walk. EXISTII�TG CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, disintegrated and scaled panels. ................................................................... �1��1 d� CITY OF ST. PAUI., COUNCIL FILE I30. PRELIMINARY ORDER By �� ,' � File No_ 597063 Voting Ward_6 In the Matter o£ Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following location{s): 597063 - North side of E Hawthorne Ave from Wa1sh St to Weide St *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of o1d sidewalk) -$7.45 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTSAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: � � 3 That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ASOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1997 Public Improvement Aid. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 25th day of June, 1997, at 4:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Pau1. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays `�lakey �ostrom +/�arx i s +il�egard �iNSorton �Pfiune ✓C.a � f �`ns �(_In Favor G Against Adopted by Council: Date � ty � � � Certified Passed by Council Secretary $y� � � N N�Q��-..� Mayor CITY OF ST. PAUL 0�� l N A L COUNCIL FILE N - l�� V I a �� FINAL ORDER By ///� � File � o. S 7063 Voting Ward 6 Ia the Matter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following location(s): 597063 - North side of E Hawthorne Ave from Walsh St to Weide St *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstructioa (replacement of o1d sidewalk) -$7.45 per front foot for a five (5) £oot wide walk and $8.94 per front Eoot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the £irst 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MtTLTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructecl sidewalk; 10�� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. under Preliminary � J The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereo£ having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directecl and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays Blakey v�ostrom �rris �gard �rton Thune j}b�ey�j..- �o\\: t� S Adopted by Council: Date��,�q�] � � � l Certified Passed by Council �ecretary �In Favor �Against � Rbs�r-'c or 'Public Hearing Date — June 25, 1997 RE 4-18-97 q 7- DEPARTMENT/OFFICFICOUNCIL DA7EINITIATED GREEN SHEET Ho. 32239 �� Public Works Sidewalks 4-��-97 INITIAUDATE INITUIVDATE CONTACTPERSON&PHONE ^pEppp7MENTDIRECT�R ❑CflYCOUNCII Robert A. Lissick - 266-6121 N �� u C�iY ATTORNEY � CfTY CLERK MUSTBEOtiWl1NC{LAGENDABV(DA7E) �'j_�_c3 f10Ui1NG �g�7pGE7DIRECTOR �FIN.BMGT.SERVICESDIR Must be in Council Research Office � MAYOR(OftASSISTMiT) � Counai Research b noon Frida 4-25-97 ❑ SO7AL r OF SN3NANRE PAGES ]. _(CUP ALL LOCAi10NS WR SIGNAN(tq � ASSOCW7E � OEP TALACCOU ANT ACTION qEWES7ED j Reconstruc[ Sidewalk in Ward 6(See attached list) � �- q 3 RECOMMENDAT70NS: Approva (!q or fleject (R) pEpr�pNp� SEpyICE CpMppCTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUEST10N5: _ P4ANNING COMMISSION _ CIVIL SEFNICE COMMISSION 1. lias ihA4 [�Y�oNF NQer vrorked under a contrect fir this departrnent? CIB COtAMiREE 2. Has mis per�rtn ever been a ciry employee? — — YES NO A SiAFF 3. Does ll�is pe/soNfirm possess a skiit not normaly pwsessed by any current ciry employee? _o157RICiCOUNCIL 5 _ YES NO SUPPORTS YMICN CWNCIL OBJEC7NE4 �Wain all yes anawers on eaparete sheet and aHaeh to green sheet INITIATIN ROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPORTUNffY (WHO, VhiAT, WHEN. WHERE. WHY): The problem "defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, aRernating free/thaw cycfes, service I'rfe limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide level and musl be addressed and crorrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk conddion would worsen to s state where it would be rendered unusabie and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible Iftigations. ADVANTAGESIF APAROVED: The community will benefit from this project because it will provide safe detect frea sidewalks for its many citizens. The sidewalk contracts are executed by private contractors, so it f411ows that private sector jo6s aze created as a resuR of this activity. DISADVAMAGES IF APPROVED: HistaricaUy, the sidewalk reconsuuctions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment. Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it still remains controversial. �.., � `,';.,� ,.,,�,... j ,�.�g,.F: Y - rSJ E? iM,;.... ieswn�:�-: , � . -- � � �'-�`� � � �� I'�t ra . DISADVANTAGES IF NOTAPPROVED: This option would ailow the ir�frastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal injury suits, ukimately resulting in the expendituse of larger doNar amouMs in eventual repairs andlor replacement, as well as claim payouts. TOSALAtdWNTOFTRANSACTIONS 3.G�+J.S2 COST/REVENUEBUDGETED(CIRCLEONEI YE No FUNDMGSOURCE 9�^3h^OC�E1] A.. P�{1 S� _�S��OOO ACRVITYNUMBER G ^ZT Z-0� S�#–Z O 2 FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (EXPLAIN) $ t AST = 3OO F OOO G, Ct6 97 � 50,O�Q SUNIMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATION 0+�� J � Ward 6 PR[LiF[`T utr_[,[�NSTRUCT SIDEWAI.B N.S E. HAWTHORNE AVE. from Walsh St. to Weide St. jq nil �?, IPiITIATII�iG ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public w J Works as public necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint and an inspection of the walk. EXISTII�TG CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, disintegrated and scaled panels. ................................................................... �1��1 d� CITY OF ST. PAUI., COUNCIL FILE I30. PRELIMINARY ORDER By �� ,' � File No_ 597063 Voting Ward_6 In the Matter o£ Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following location{s): 597063 - North side of E Hawthorne Ave from Wa1sh St to Weide St *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of o1d sidewalk) -$7.45 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTSAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: � � 3 That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ASOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1997 Public Improvement Aid. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 25th day of June, 1997, at 4:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Pau1. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays `�lakey �ostrom +/�arx i s +il�egard �iNSorton �Pfiune ✓C.a � f �`ns �(_In Favor G Against Adopted by Council: Date � ty � � � Certified Passed by Council Secretary $y� � � N N�Q��-..� Mayor CITY OF ST. PAUL 0�� l N A L COUNCIL FILE N - l�� V I a �� FINAL ORDER By ///� � File � o. S 7063 Voting Ward 6 Ia the Matter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following location(s): 597063 - North side of E Hawthorne Ave from Walsh St to Weide St *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstructioa (replacement of o1d sidewalk) -$7.45 per front foot for a five (5) £oot wide walk and $8.94 per front Eoot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the £irst 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MtTLTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructecl sidewalk; 10�� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. under Preliminary � J The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereo£ having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directecl and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays Blakey v�ostrom �rris �gard �rton Thune j}b�ey�j..- �o\\: t� S Adopted by Council: Date��,�q�] � � � l Certified Passed by Council �ecretary �In Favor �Against � Rbs�r-'c or 'Public Hearing Date — June 25, 1997 RE 4-18-97 q 7- DEPARTMENT/OFFICFICOUNCIL DA7EINITIATED GREEN SHEET Ho. 32239 �� Public Works Sidewalks 4-��-97 INITIAUDATE INITUIVDATE CONTACTPERSON&PHONE ^pEppp7MENTDIRECT�R ❑CflYCOUNCII Robert A. Lissick - 266-6121 N �� u C�iY ATTORNEY � CfTY CLERK MUSTBEOtiWl1NC{LAGENDABV(DA7E) �'j_�_c3 f10Ui1NG �g�7pGE7DIRECTOR �FIN.BMGT.SERVICESDIR Must be in Council Research Office � MAYOR(OftASSISTMiT) � Counai Research b noon Frida 4-25-97 ❑ SO7AL r OF SN3NANRE PAGES ]. _(CUP ALL LOCAi10NS WR SIGNAN(tq � ASSOCW7E � OEP TALACCOU ANT ACTION qEWES7ED j Reconstruc[ Sidewalk in Ward 6(See attached list) � �- q 3 RECOMMENDAT70NS: Approva (!q or fleject (R) pEpr�pNp� SEpyICE CpMppCTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUEST10N5: _ P4ANNING COMMISSION _ CIVIL SEFNICE COMMISSION 1. lias ihA4 [�Y�oNF NQer vrorked under a contrect fir this departrnent? CIB COtAMiREE 2. Has mis per�rtn ever been a ciry employee? — — YES NO A SiAFF 3. Does ll�is pe/soNfirm possess a skiit not normaly pwsessed by any current ciry employee? _o157RICiCOUNCIL 5 _ YES NO SUPPORTS YMICN CWNCIL OBJEC7NE4 �Wain all yes anawers on eaparete sheet and aHaeh to green sheet INITIATIN ROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPORTUNffY (WHO, VhiAT, WHEN. WHERE. WHY): The problem "defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, aRernating free/thaw cycfes, service I'rfe limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide level and musl be addressed and crorrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk conddion would worsen to s state where it would be rendered unusabie and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible Iftigations. ADVANTAGESIF APAROVED: The community will benefit from this project because it will provide safe detect frea sidewalks for its many citizens. The sidewalk contracts are executed by private contractors, so it f411ows that private sector jo6s aze created as a resuR of this activity. DISADVAMAGES IF APPROVED: HistaricaUy, the sidewalk reconsuuctions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment. Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it still remains controversial. �.., � `,';.,� ,.,,�,... j ,�.�g,.F: Y - rSJ E? iM,;.... ieswn�:�-: , � . -- � � �'-�`� � � �� I'�t ra . DISADVANTAGES IF NOTAPPROVED: This option would ailow the ir�frastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal injury suits, ukimately resulting in the expendituse of larger doNar amouMs in eventual repairs andlor replacement, as well as claim payouts. TOSALAtdWNTOFTRANSACTIONS 3.G�+J.S2 COST/REVENUEBUDGETED(CIRCLEONEI YE No FUNDMGSOURCE 9�^3h^OC�E1] A.. P�{1 S� _�S��OOO ACRVITYNUMBER G ^ZT Z-0� S�#–Z O 2 FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (EXPLAIN) $ t AST = 3OO F OOO G, Ct6 97 � 50,O�Q SUNIMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATION 0+�� J � Ward 6 PR[LiF[`T utr_[,[�NSTRUCT SIDEWAI.B N.S E. HAWTHORNE AVE. from Walsh St. to Weide St. jq nil �?, IPiITIATII�iG ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public w J Works as public necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint and an inspection of the walk. EXISTII�TG CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, disintegrated and scaled panels. ................................................................... �1��1 d� CITY OF ST. PAUI., COUNCIL FILE I30. PRELIMINARY ORDER By �� ,' � File No_ 597063 Voting Ward_6 In the Matter o£ Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following location{s): 597063 - North side of E Hawthorne Ave from Wa1sh St to Weide St *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of o1d sidewalk) -$7.45 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTSAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: � � 3 That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ASOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1997 Public Improvement Aid. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 25th day of June, 1997, at 4:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Pau1. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays `�lakey �ostrom +/�arx i s +il�egard �iNSorton �Pfiune ✓C.a � f �`ns �(_In Favor G Against Adopted by Council: Date � ty � � � Certified Passed by Council Secretary $y� � � N N�Q��-..� Mayor