The URL can be used to link to this page

97-817CITY OF ST. PAIIL FINAL ORDER q � - 8 I �5 7052-597062 Ia the Matter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following location(s): 597052 - Both sides of Alameda St from W Iowa Ave to W California Ave 597053 - South side of W Arlington Ave from Galtier St to Farrington St 597054 - Both sides of Como Place from Hatch Ave to W Jessamine Ave 597055 - North side of W Cook Ave from Galtier St to Matilda St 597056 - East side of Galtier St from Wayzata St to Front Ave & the West side of Galtier St from Stinson St to Front Ave 597057 - Both sides of Hatch Ave from N Victoria St to N Milton St, East side N Milton St from Front Ave to Hatch Ave & West side N Victoria St from Front Ave to Hatch Ave 597058 - Both sides Huran St from W Arlington Ave to W Hoyt Ave 597059 - Both sides Matilda St from W Lawson Ave to W Cook Ave 597060 - Both sides Matilda St from W Maryland Ave to W Ivy Ave 597061 - Both sides Maywood St from W Wheelock Pkwy to W Cottage Ave 597062 - Both sides Schletti St from W Cottage Ave to W Arlington Ave ��-�� *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures} Recoastruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.45 per front foot £or a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot for a six {6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construation (where no walk existed) - 100� o£ the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the £irst 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (MOre than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� o£ actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. unclar Preliminary order �'� —� t�.s approved � ly,� �J Q.�, 1 1� The Council of the City of Saint Paul kas conducted a gublic hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereo£ having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard a11 persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Pau1 does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said.improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays ✓lakey v'�ostrom ✓ffarris vhfegard vNrorton zl'Prune C�1\;v.s - la1�s�,.k � In Favor d Against < Cv�i 5-�}.� Adopted by Council: Datey��('� (� Certified Passed by Council Secretary By�._ �_� . �� _ � �'�--� Mayor ___ .,u« - �une 25, 1997 RE 4-18-97 q f)? DEPARTMENT/OFFICFJCOUNCIL DA7EINR�A7E0 GREEN SHEET NO. `322`�g Public Works Sidewaiks 410-97 IN7TIAUOATE INITIAWATE COMACTPERWNSPHONE pEpppTMEMDIRECTOR �CITYCOUNCIL Ro6ert A. Lissick - 266-6121 ��N GTY AtTORNEY � CI7Y CLERK MUSTeEONWUNCILAGENDAflY@ATt�S_7_97 � � g�pGE7D7RECTOq �FIN,&MGT.SERViCESDIR. Must be in Council Research Office ti1pVOR(OHJSSISTAHi) 1 Counaf Research no later th � TOTALlt OF SfGNANqE PAGES _ ICI�P ALL LOCA710N3 FOR 91GNASUNk7 � ASSOCIATE ENTAL ACCOUNfANT PCTION RE�IlES7E0 l Construd & Reconstruct Sidewalk in Ward 5(See attached list} �� J4 PECOMMENOATIONS:Pppra+(A) w fielea 4R) PER90NAL 3 pe E r q 5p V n IC /I E i CONTHACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOMIfNG dJESTIONS: _PLANNIWGWMMISSbN _CNILSEAVICECOMMISSIQN 7. H3sthis EY S NOerworkedunderacontrac[fwlhi5depaNlient? ae CoMMmEE 2. Nas rt�is per�rm ever 6een a dty employee? — YES NO A 57AFF 3. Does ihis persorVfirm possess a skill notrwrmalty possessed by any curtentciry — �� — employee? YES NO _OfSTRICiCOUNCll4 _ SUPPOFTS Vh11CH COUNCI �.IECTNE? �W� aN yas amswars on separete sheat aM attach to green shaet INITIATWG PROBLEM, 4SSUE.OPPQRTL1NfiY (tMFlO, WHAT, WHEN, WHERE. WH`(�: Tha problem "defiective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, alternating freeRhaw cycies, service IiFe limits, chemica( add'dives, extreme temperature variations, eta Thesa problems oracur on a citywide level and must be addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusable and subject to increased padestrian injuries from falis and possible litigations. ADVANTAGES IF APPROVED: The communRy will benefii trom this project because it will provide safe detect free sidewalks for its many citizens. The sidewafk contracts are executed by private contractars, so it foliows that privaze secior jobs are created as a resuk of this activity. DISADVANSAGES IF APPROVED: Historicaily, the sidewalk reconstructions hava created negative feedBack in the area of construction procedure and assessment. Simply stated, property ownets detest assessments, and despde the fad up to one-ha4f the assessme�t is City subsidized, it still remains controversial. ,,... . , , . ..r.. _ ,_:��r .._ .. r. .. ...,:�1 DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED: � -� �� -- � This option would ailow the infrastructure of sidewa{k stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal injury suits, uftimately resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in eventual repairs and/or rep�acement, as well as claim payouts. TOTALAMOUNTOFTRANSACTIONS 76.&68 64 CO5T/REYENUEBUDGETED(CIRCLEONE) YES NO FUNOINGSOURCE 97-�-.0667 A , P4A 97 = 457 f 000 ACRYRYNUMBEP f.97-97'794-mR4-��m � FINANCIqLINFOGiMAT10N:(EXPIAIN) B, AST = 360i C, CPB g7 = 50a0a0 June 25, 1997, City Council Agenda c� ��- $� � �' �� Page 10 85. Final Order - 97-817 - In the matter of sidewalk reconstruction on both sides of Alameda Street from West lowa Avenue to Califomia Avenue; the south side of West Arlington Avenue from Galtier Street to Farrington Street; both sides of Como Place from Hatch Avenue to West Jessamine Avenue; the north side of West Cook Avenue from Gattier Street to Matilda Street; tfie east side of Galtier Street from Wayzata Street to Front Avenue and the west side of Galtier Street from Stinson Street to �ront Avenue; both sides of Hatch Avenue from fVorth Victoria Street to North Milton Street, the east side of North Milton Street from Front Avenue to Hatch Avenue and the west side of North vctoria Street from Front Avenue to Hatch Avenue; both sides of Huron Street from West Arlington Avenue to West Hoyt Avenue; both sides of Matilda Street from West Lawson Avenue to West Cook Avenue; both sides of Matilda Street from West Maryland Avenue to West Ivy Avenue; both sides of Maywood Street from West Wheelock Parkway to West Cottage Avenue; and both sides of Schletti Sfreet from West Cottage Avenue to West Arlington Avenue. (File #597052- S97062) �` � June 19, 1997 St.Paul City Council Public Hearing; Sidewaik Reconstruction - 6-25-97. 4:30 PM Property Address: 1405 Schletti St. St.Paul, MN F7emings Subo Lot I�, Parcel ID:24-29-23-32-0025 Dear Member of Finance Division, The sidewalk adjacent to our property has developed several sertous defects, that may affect the safety of the public. As we71 as our own safety. We vote YES for a new sidewalk. Especially young children on roller blades, andJor bicycles. It is esQecially dangerous for elderly people during in- clement weather, when ice and snow cover the defects. There are several places where the sidewalk has raised and cracked from tree roots, which are very dangerous. Thank you for your consideration of this problem_ �'F�; ;.. _ �� f Sincerely, � ,9 , . s . s -�, i `. . � « a � r .�.�-rC�� /`, � � Jo n& Lucille M. Kampa • Prooerty Owners of 1405 Schletti Street ,,, St.Paul, MN 55117 R€CEf 488-0179 . JUN 2 4 t997 ` '� �� r�L�it'�:: SUNIMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATIONS Ward 5 a�-�� PROJECT: REC011TSTRUCT SIDEWALH B.S. ALAMEDA ST. from W. Iowa Ave. to W. California Ave. p IIvITIATII�IG ACTIO2�i: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works � t��Z as public necessity on the basis of two (2} complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING COPiDITIOPi3: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaes, asphalt patches, disintegrated, scaled, settled and cracked panels. ................................................................... �ROJECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALH S.S W. ARLINGTON AVE. from Galtier St. to Farrington St. 5�� INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of three (e) complaints, a petition with one (1) signer and an inspection of the walk. EICISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, settled and cracked panels. ................................................................. PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALg B.S. COMO PL. from Hatch Ave. to W. Jessamine Ave. �?�5� IlvITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basisof five (5) complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves. asphalt patches, disintegrated, scaled, settled and cracked panels. PR03ECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK N.S. W. COOK AVE. from Galtier St. to Matilda St. �pM LL I1vITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public �(V J� Works as public necessity on the basis of three (3} complaints, a petition with one (1) signer and an inspection of the walk. E%ISTING CONDITIONS: This watk is poured concrete with asphait patches, disintegrated, scaled and settled panels. ................................................................... -2- al�� /7 PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK E.S. GALTIER ST. from Wayzata St. to Front Ave. & W.S. GALTIER ST: from Stinson St. to Front Ave. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works � qp�/. as pubHc necessity on the basis of four (4) complaints, a petition with one {1) 1 Y �J signer and an inspection of the walk. E%ISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, disintegrated, scaled and cracked paneis. ................................................................... PROJECT: RECONSTR[3CT SIDEWALg B.S. HATCH AVE. from N. Victoria St. to N. Miiton St., E.S. N. MILTON ST. from Front Ave to Hatch Ave. & W.S. N. VICTfJRtA ST. from F�ont Ave. to Hatch Ave. �9�� IIvITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of three {g} compiaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, settled and cracked panels. ................................................................... PRf1.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. HURON ST. from W. Arlington Ave. to W. Hoyt Ave. IIvITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works ��0� gublic necessity on the basis of seven t7) complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphait patches, scaled, settted and cracked panels. ................................................................... PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALS B.S. MATILDA ST. from W. I.awson Ave. to W. Cook Ave. C, 4/j(y� INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works ✓`( V!� as public necessity on the basis of two (2) complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CQNDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, water pockets, asphalt patches, scaled and settled panels. ................................................................... PROJECT• RECONSTRBCT SIDEWALH B.S. MATILDA ST: from W. Maryland Ave. to W. Ivy Ave. -3- �� IIvITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as publlc necessity on the basis of eight {8l complaints, a petition with one (1) �� signer and an inspection of the walk. E%ISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, water pockets, asphalt patches, scaled and settled panels. ................................................................... B.S. MAYWOOD Si: from W. Wheelock Fkwy. to W. Cottage Ave. __��' � TING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works Jp as public necessity on the basis of four (4) complaints and an inspection of the EIIISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, disintegrated, scaled, setded and cracked panels. ................................................................... PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALS B.S. SCHLETTI ST. from W. Cottage Ave. to W. Arlington Ave. ��na4Z �TIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of seven (7} complaints, a petition with one (1) signer and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIOPIS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, scaled, settied and cracked panels. .................................................................. CITY OF ST. PAUL PRELIMINA.RY ORDER °l��F�r1 3r 9'7052-59'7062 In the Matter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following location(s): 597052 - Both sides o£ Alameda St from W Iowa Ave to W California Ave 597653 - South side of W Arlington Ave from Galtier St to Farrington St S9?054 - Both sides of Como Place from Hatch Ave to W Jessamine Ave 597055 - North side of W Cook Ave from Galtier St to Matilda St 597056 - East side o£ Galtier St £rom Wayzata St to Front Ave & the West side of Galtier St from Stinson St to Front Ave 597057 - Both sides of Hatch Ave from N Victoria St to N Milton St, ' East side N Milton St from Front Ave to Hatch Ave & West side N Victoria St from Front Ave to Hatch Ave 597058 - Both sides Huron St from W Arlington Ave to W Hoyt Ave 597059 - Both sides Matilda St from W Lawson Ave to W Cook Ave 597060 - Both sides Matilda St from W Maryland Ave to W Ivy Ave 597061 - Both sides Maywood St from W Wheelock Pkwy to W Cottage Ave 597062 - Both sicles Schletti St from W Cottage Ave to W Arlington Ave q�- �� : *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RA2'E5 RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.45 per front foot for a £ive (5) £oot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New aonstruction {where no walk existed) - 100$ of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" o£ the property. MULTI-RESIDEI3TIAL(More than three family structures), NpN-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1�0� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated consCruction rates, financed by assessments and 1997 Public Improvement Aid. 2 3 That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 25th day o£ June, 1997, at 4:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said pul�lic hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays ✓lakey �/fiostrom ;it?arris ,iMegard ;iNiorton �I'hune ,� bl\��.5 l In Favor �Against Adopted by Council: Date Q� -�U �� Certified Passed by Council Secretary BY "�� •� . �f`��_r�..., � Mayor _ .� � ,, , _ � � �. ( � � ✓� � \ �� i�_� .... __.. . .€� ; __ ---� � :� � � `,� �J � � ` w � _ <.� �.� --.; w .: �'r_ f �:-c � , � . � ' � ,� ,.- ; �:.. � : `� T=� r �� .-� • � � � .,,9 �`^. 3t?, `� } �' s y . � yy .a„ .-.+.. ' � .. � r�, y;: �' F":a t -�. `'y 5 �'v e:.� -�<l - � y �-. r . � ��.. �!' a . � _tv [� n`*" .. . �4�3l�C _ ¢` . � � �� '� �� . ��'- r"w <.4 _� �' ��. � � � �\ � ;- _ �. � � , � -- ,- - a_- ,. : . - :i, � r _ _ - ->� ` , '..' rt � - - �- ,;. _ _ � i � - _ '�_ ,� , � �� " "' — � �- E �� - � _ 1rj t �{ 1'ti[< t. �_ ' . - . )s '. ��// • L Ni y • Yi / /�k � * � x � - � � ��fs �. .. � �• � >. �.� � � � � l � j . - " t �j , sj.J 5(. ✓:. - ..� ^ � �'w�. _ " t, ", rt�s' 4, � j _ L , _... ^�,f�t »' 1 ; _ _ � � �.� . • 1. 1 � t�- �j: I 1C\.� � � . r -+�' � . .. � . \ � � i ` �� - �� r �, �� i ,�u I S-� �'" - t ' I _ � . ` ��I{� " + � y . �� - - �. -�� .'��_..�.-�..`�-'.�.-�`�..� ;i_' .. .� '�° ".''�.^'�_�s�" .,,- 1 . �_. ',_ .> �' ,. . . �. - � . , _ _.,. .- .. '- tr' ^ F� ...._. I . �. ,. � �..� '..��'.. ��,.� � ' � `�� i �ti�� ' �.. _!fi . . r . : < �.�= �: �..a....: �,.' _... ,:.�,�� .: ��..i t. .._ _' . . . _ __ ��.: ��ca:_ � CITY OF ST. PAIIL FINAL ORDER q � - 8 I �5 7052-597062 Ia the Matter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following location(s): 597052 - Both sides of Alameda St from W Iowa Ave to W California Ave 597053 - South side of W Arlington Ave from Galtier St to Farrington St 597054 - Both sides of Como Place from Hatch Ave to W Jessamine Ave 597055 - North side of W Cook Ave from Galtier St to Matilda St 597056 - East side of Galtier St from Wayzata St to Front Ave & the West side of Galtier St from Stinson St to Front Ave 597057 - Both sides of Hatch Ave from N Victoria St to N Milton St, East side N Milton St from Front Ave to Hatch Ave & West side N Victoria St from Front Ave to Hatch Ave 597058 - Both sides Huran St from W Arlington Ave to W Hoyt Ave 597059 - Both sides Matilda St from W Lawson Ave to W Cook Ave 597060 - Both sides Matilda St from W Maryland Ave to W Ivy Ave 597061 - Both sides Maywood St from W Wheelock Pkwy to W Cottage Ave 597062 - Both sides Schletti St from W Cottage Ave to W Arlington Ave ��-�� *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures} Recoastruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.45 per front foot £or a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot for a six {6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construation (where no walk existed) - 100� o£ the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the £irst 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (MOre than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� o£ actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. unclar Preliminary order �'� —� t�.s approved � ly,� �J Q.�, 1 1� The Council of the City of Saint Paul kas conducted a gublic hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereo£ having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard a11 persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Pau1 does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said.improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays ✓lakey v'�ostrom ✓ffarris vhfegard vNrorton zl'Prune C�1\;v.s - la1�s�,.k � In Favor d Against < Cv�i 5-�}.� Adopted by Council: Datey��('� (� Certified Passed by Council Secretary By�._ �_� . �� _ � �'�--� Mayor ___ .,u« - �une 25, 1997 RE 4-18-97 q f)? DEPARTMENT/OFFICFJCOUNCIL DA7EINR�A7E0 GREEN SHEET NO. `322`�g Public Works Sidewaiks 410-97 IN7TIAUOATE INITIAWATE COMACTPERWNSPHONE pEpppTMEMDIRECTOR �CITYCOUNCIL Ro6ert A. Lissick - 266-6121 ��N GTY AtTORNEY � CI7Y CLERK MUSTeEONWUNCILAGENDAflY@ATt�S_7_97 � � g�pGE7D7RECTOq �FIN,&MGT.SERViCESDIR. Must be in Council Research Office ti1pVOR(OHJSSISTAHi) 1 Counaf Research no later th � TOTALlt OF SfGNANqE PAGES _ ICI�P ALL LOCA710N3 FOR 91GNASUNk7 � ASSOCIATE ENTAL ACCOUNfANT PCTION RE�IlES7E0 l Construd & Reconstruct Sidewalk in Ward 5(See attached list} �� J4 PECOMMENOATIONS:Pppra+(A) w fielea 4R) PER90NAL 3 pe E r q 5p V n IC /I E i CONTHACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOMIfNG dJESTIONS: _PLANNIWGWMMISSbN _CNILSEAVICECOMMISSIQN 7. H3sthis EY S NOerworkedunderacontrac[fwlhi5depaNlient? ae CoMMmEE 2. Nas rt�is per�rm ever 6een a dty employee? — YES NO A 57AFF 3. Does ihis persorVfirm possess a skill notrwrmalty possessed by any curtentciry — �� — employee? YES NO _OfSTRICiCOUNCll4 _ SUPPOFTS Vh11CH COUNCI �.IECTNE? �W� aN yas amswars on separete sheat aM attach to green shaet INITIATWG PROBLEM, 4SSUE.OPPQRTL1NfiY (tMFlO, WHAT, WHEN, WHERE. WH`(�: Tha problem "defiective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, alternating freeRhaw cycies, service IiFe limits, chemica( add'dives, extreme temperature variations, eta Thesa problems oracur on a citywide level and must be addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusable and subject to increased padestrian injuries from falis and possible litigations. ADVANTAGES IF APPROVED: The communRy will benefii trom this project because it will provide safe detect free sidewalks for its many citizens. The sidewafk contracts are executed by private contractars, so it foliows that privaze secior jobs are created as a resuk of this activity. DISADVANSAGES IF APPROVED: Historicaily, the sidewalk reconstructions hava created negative feedBack in the area of construction procedure and assessment. Simply stated, property ownets detest assessments, and despde the fad up to one-ha4f the assessme�t is City subsidized, it still remains controversial. ,,... . , , . ..r.. _ ,_:��r .._ .. r. .. ...,:�1 DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED: � -� �� -- � This option would ailow the infrastructure of sidewa{k stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal injury suits, uftimately resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in eventual repairs and/or rep�acement, as well as claim payouts. TOTALAMOUNTOFTRANSACTIONS 76.&68 64 CO5T/REYENUEBUDGETED(CIRCLEONE) YES NO FUNOINGSOURCE 97-�-.0667 A , P4A 97 = 457 f 000 ACRYRYNUMBEP f.97-97'794-mR4-��m � FINANCIqLINFOGiMAT10N:(EXPIAIN) B, AST = 360i C, CPB g7 = 50a0a0 June 25, 1997, City Council Agenda c� ��- $� � �' �� Page 10 85. Final Order - 97-817 - In the matter of sidewalk reconstruction on both sides of Alameda Street from West lowa Avenue to Califomia Avenue; the south side of West Arlington Avenue from Galtier Street to Farrington Street; both sides of Como Place from Hatch Avenue to West Jessamine Avenue; the north side of West Cook Avenue from Gattier Street to Matilda Street; tfie east side of Galtier Street from Wayzata Street to Front Avenue and the west side of Galtier Street from Stinson Street to �ront Avenue; both sides of Hatch Avenue from fVorth Victoria Street to North Milton Street, the east side of North Milton Street from Front Avenue to Hatch Avenue and the west side of North vctoria Street from Front Avenue to Hatch Avenue; both sides of Huron Street from West Arlington Avenue to West Hoyt Avenue; both sides of Matilda Street from West Lawson Avenue to West Cook Avenue; both sides of Matilda Street from West Maryland Avenue to West Ivy Avenue; both sides of Maywood Street from West Wheelock Parkway to West Cottage Avenue; and both sides of Schletti Sfreet from West Cottage Avenue to West Arlington Avenue. (File #597052- S97062) �` � June 19, 1997 St.Paul City Council Public Hearing; Sidewaik Reconstruction - 6-25-97. 4:30 PM Property Address: 1405 Schletti St. St.Paul, MN F7emings Subo Lot I�, Parcel ID:24-29-23-32-0025 Dear Member of Finance Division, The sidewalk adjacent to our property has developed several sertous defects, that may affect the safety of the public. As we71 as our own safety. We vote YES for a new sidewalk. Especially young children on roller blades, andJor bicycles. It is esQecially dangerous for elderly people during in- clement weather, when ice and snow cover the defects. There are several places where the sidewalk has raised and cracked from tree roots, which are very dangerous. Thank you for your consideration of this problem_ �'F�; ;.. _ �� f Sincerely, � ,9 , . s . s -�, i `. . � « a � r .�.�-rC�� /`, � � Jo n& Lucille M. Kampa • Prooerty Owners of 1405 Schletti Street ,,, St.Paul, MN 55117 R€CEf 488-0179 . JUN 2 4 t997 ` '� �� r�L�it'�:: SUNIMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATIONS Ward 5 a�-�� PROJECT: REC011TSTRUCT SIDEWALH B.S. ALAMEDA ST. from W. Iowa Ave. to W. California Ave. p IIvITIATII�IG ACTIO2�i: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works � t��Z as public necessity on the basis of two (2} complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING COPiDITIOPi3: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaes, asphalt patches, disintegrated, scaled, settled and cracked panels. ................................................................... �ROJECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALH S.S W. ARLINGTON AVE. from Galtier St. to Farrington St. 5�� INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of three (e) complaints, a petition with one (1) signer and an inspection of the walk. EICISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, settled and cracked panels. ................................................................. PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALg B.S. COMO PL. from Hatch Ave. to W. Jessamine Ave. �?�5� IlvITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basisof five (5) complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves. asphalt patches, disintegrated, scaled, settled and cracked panels. PR03ECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK N.S. W. COOK AVE. from Galtier St. to Matilda St. �pM LL I1vITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public �(V J� Works as public necessity on the basis of three (3} complaints, a petition with one (1) signer and an inspection of the walk. E%ISTING CONDITIONS: This watk is poured concrete with asphait patches, disintegrated, scaled and settled panels. ................................................................... -2- al�� /7 PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK E.S. GALTIER ST. from Wayzata St. to Front Ave. & W.S. GALTIER ST: from Stinson St. to Front Ave. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works � qp�/. as pubHc necessity on the basis of four (4) complaints, a petition with one {1) 1 Y �J signer and an inspection of the walk. E%ISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, disintegrated, scaled and cracked paneis. ................................................................... PROJECT: RECONSTR[3CT SIDEWALg B.S. HATCH AVE. from N. Victoria St. to N. Miiton St., E.S. N. MILTON ST. from Front Ave to Hatch Ave. & W.S. N. VICTfJRtA ST. from F�ont Ave. to Hatch Ave. �9�� IIvITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of three {g} compiaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, settled and cracked panels. ................................................................... PRf1.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. HURON ST. from W. Arlington Ave. to W. Hoyt Ave. IIvITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works ��0� gublic necessity on the basis of seven t7) complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphait patches, scaled, settted and cracked panels. ................................................................... PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALS B.S. MATILDA ST. from W. I.awson Ave. to W. Cook Ave. C, 4/j(y� INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works ✓`( V!� as public necessity on the basis of two (2) complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CQNDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, water pockets, asphalt patches, scaled and settled panels. ................................................................... PROJECT• RECONSTRBCT SIDEWALH B.S. MATILDA ST: from W. Maryland Ave. to W. Ivy Ave. -3- �� IIvITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as publlc necessity on the basis of eight {8l complaints, a petition with one (1) �� signer and an inspection of the walk. E%ISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, water pockets, asphalt patches, scaled and settled panels. ................................................................... B.S. MAYWOOD Si: from W. Wheelock Fkwy. to W. Cottage Ave. __��' � TING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works Jp as public necessity on the basis of four (4) complaints and an inspection of the EIIISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, disintegrated, scaled, setded and cracked panels. ................................................................... PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALS B.S. SCHLETTI ST. from W. Cottage Ave. to W. Arlington Ave. ��na4Z �TIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of seven (7} complaints, a petition with one (1) signer and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIOPIS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, scaled, settied and cracked panels. .................................................................. CITY OF ST. PAUL PRELIMINA.RY ORDER °l��F�r1 3r 9'7052-59'7062 In the Matter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following location(s): 597052 - Both sides o£ Alameda St from W Iowa Ave to W California Ave 597653 - South side of W Arlington Ave from Galtier St to Farrington St S9?054 - Both sides of Como Place from Hatch Ave to W Jessamine Ave 597055 - North side of W Cook Ave from Galtier St to Matilda St 597056 - East side o£ Galtier St £rom Wayzata St to Front Ave & the West side of Galtier St from Stinson St to Front Ave 597057 - Both sides of Hatch Ave from N Victoria St to N Milton St, ' East side N Milton St from Front Ave to Hatch Ave & West side N Victoria St from Front Ave to Hatch Ave 597058 - Both sides Huron St from W Arlington Ave to W Hoyt Ave 597059 - Both sides Matilda St from W Lawson Ave to W Cook Ave 597060 - Both sides Matilda St from W Maryland Ave to W Ivy Ave 597061 - Both sides Maywood St from W Wheelock Pkwy to W Cottage Ave 597062 - Both sicles Schletti St from W Cottage Ave to W Arlington Ave q�- �� : *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RA2'E5 RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.45 per front foot for a £ive (5) £oot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New aonstruction {where no walk existed) - 100$ of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" o£ the property. MULTI-RESIDEI3TIAL(More than three family structures), NpN-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1�0� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated consCruction rates, financed by assessments and 1997 Public Improvement Aid. 2 3 That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 25th day o£ June, 1997, at 4:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said pul�lic hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays ✓lakey �/fiostrom ;it?arris ,iMegard ;iNiorton �I'hune ,� bl\��.5 l In Favor �Against Adopted by Council: Date Q� -�U �� Certified Passed by Council Secretary BY "�� •� . �f`��_r�..., � Mayor _ .� � ,, , _ � � �. ( � � ✓� � \ �� i�_� .... __.. . .€� ; __ ---� � :� � � `,� �J � � ` w � _ <.� �.� --.; w .: �'r_ f �:-c � , � . � ' � ,� ,.- ; �:.. � : `� T=� r �� .-� • � � � .,,9 �`^. 3t?, `� } �' s y . � yy .a„ .-.+.. ' � .. � r�, y;: �' F":a t -�. `'y 5 �'v e:.� -�<l - � y �-. r . � ��.. �!' a . � _tv [� n`*" .. . �4�3l�C _ ¢` . � � �� '� �� . ��'- r"w <.4 _� �' ��. � � � �\ � ;- _ �. � � , � -- ,- - a_- ,. : . - :i, � r _ _ - ->� ` , '..' rt � - - �- ,;. _ _ � i � - _ '�_ ,� , � �� " "' — � �- E �� - � _ 1rj t �{ 1'ti[< t. �_ ' . - . )s '. ��// • L Ni y • Yi / /�k � * � x � - � � ��fs �. .. � �• � >. �.� � � � � l � j . - " t �j , sj.J 5(. ✓:. - ..� ^ � �'w�. _ " t, ", rt�s' 4, � j _ L , _... ^�,f�t »' 1 ; _ _ � � �.� . • 1. 1 � t�- �j: I 1C\.� � � . r -+�' � . .. � . \ � � i ` �� - �� r �, �� i ,�u I S-� �'" - t ' I _ � . ` ��I{� " + � y . �� - - �. -�� .'��_..�.-�..`�-'.�.-�`�..� ;i_' .. .� '�° ".''�.^'�_�s�" .,,- 1 . �_. ',_ .> �' ,. . . �. - � . , _ _.,. .- .. '- tr' ^ F� ...._. I . �. ,. � �..� '..��'.. ��,.� � ' � `�� i �ti�� ' �.. _!fi . . r . : < �.�= �: �..a....: �,.' _... ,:.�,�� .: ��..i t. .._ _' . . . _ __ ��.: ��ca:_ � CITY OF ST. PAIIL FINAL ORDER q � - 8 I �5 7052-597062 Ia the Matter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following location(s): 597052 - Both sides of Alameda St from W Iowa Ave to W California Ave 597053 - South side of W Arlington Ave from Galtier St to Farrington St 597054 - Both sides of Como Place from Hatch Ave to W Jessamine Ave 597055 - North side of W Cook Ave from Galtier St to Matilda St 597056 - East side of Galtier St from Wayzata St to Front Ave & the West side of Galtier St from Stinson St to Front Ave 597057 - Both sides of Hatch Ave from N Victoria St to N Milton St, East side N Milton St from Front Ave to Hatch Ave & West side N Victoria St from Front Ave to Hatch Ave 597058 - Both sides Huran St from W Arlington Ave to W Hoyt Ave 597059 - Both sides Matilda St from W Lawson Ave to W Cook Ave 597060 - Both sides Matilda St from W Maryland Ave to W Ivy Ave 597061 - Both sides Maywood St from W Wheelock Pkwy to W Cottage Ave 597062 - Both sides Schletti St from W Cottage Ave to W Arlington Ave ��-�� *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures} Recoastruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.45 per front foot £or a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot for a six {6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construation (where no walk existed) - 100� o£ the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the £irst 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (MOre than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� o£ actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. unclar Preliminary order �'� —� t�.s approved � ly,� �J Q.�, 1 1� The Council of the City of Saint Paul kas conducted a gublic hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereo£ having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard a11 persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Pau1 does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said.improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays ✓lakey v'�ostrom ✓ffarris vhfegard vNrorton zl'Prune C�1\;v.s - la1�s�,.k � In Favor d Against < Cv�i 5-�}.� Adopted by Council: Datey��('� (� Certified Passed by Council Secretary By�._ �_� . �� _ � �'�--� Mayor ___ .,u« - �une 25, 1997 RE 4-18-97 q f)? DEPARTMENT/OFFICFJCOUNCIL DA7EINR�A7E0 GREEN SHEET NO. `322`�g Public Works Sidewaiks 410-97 IN7TIAUOATE INITIAWATE COMACTPERWNSPHONE pEpppTMEMDIRECTOR �CITYCOUNCIL Ro6ert A. Lissick - 266-6121 ��N GTY AtTORNEY � CI7Y CLERK MUSTeEONWUNCILAGENDAflY@ATt�S_7_97 � � g�pGE7D7RECTOq �FIN,&MGT.SERViCESDIR. Must be in Council Research Office ti1pVOR(OHJSSISTAHi) 1 Counaf Research no later th � TOTALlt OF SfGNANqE PAGES _ ICI�P ALL LOCA710N3 FOR 91GNASUNk7 � ASSOCIATE ENTAL ACCOUNfANT PCTION RE�IlES7E0 l Construd & Reconstruct Sidewalk in Ward 5(See attached list} �� J4 PECOMMENOATIONS:Pppra+(A) w fielea 4R) PER90NAL 3 pe E r q 5p V n IC /I E i CONTHACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOMIfNG dJESTIONS: _PLANNIWGWMMISSbN _CNILSEAVICECOMMISSIQN 7. H3sthis EY S NOerworkedunderacontrac[fwlhi5depaNlient? ae CoMMmEE 2. Nas rt�is per�rm ever 6een a dty employee? — YES NO A 57AFF 3. Does ihis persorVfirm possess a skill notrwrmalty possessed by any curtentciry — �� — employee? YES NO _OfSTRICiCOUNCll4 _ SUPPOFTS Vh11CH COUNCI �.IECTNE? �W� aN yas amswars on separete sheat aM attach to green shaet INITIATWG PROBLEM, 4SSUE.OPPQRTL1NfiY (tMFlO, WHAT, WHEN, WHERE. WH`(�: Tha problem "defiective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, alternating freeRhaw cycies, service IiFe limits, chemica( add'dives, extreme temperature variations, eta Thesa problems oracur on a citywide level and must be addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusable and subject to increased padestrian injuries from falis and possible litigations. ADVANTAGES IF APPROVED: The communRy will benefii trom this project because it will provide safe detect free sidewalks for its many citizens. The sidewafk contracts are executed by private contractars, so it foliows that privaze secior jobs are created as a resuk of this activity. DISADVANSAGES IF APPROVED: Historicaily, the sidewalk reconstructions hava created negative feedBack in the area of construction procedure and assessment. Simply stated, property ownets detest assessments, and despde the fad up to one-ha4f the assessme�t is City subsidized, it still remains controversial. ,,... . , , . ..r.. _ ,_:��r .._ .. r. .. ...,:�1 DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED: � -� �� -- � This option would ailow the infrastructure of sidewa{k stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal injury suits, uftimately resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in eventual repairs and/or rep�acement, as well as claim payouts. TOTALAMOUNTOFTRANSACTIONS 76.&68 64 CO5T/REYENUEBUDGETED(CIRCLEONE) YES NO FUNOINGSOURCE 97-�-.0667 A , P4A 97 = 457 f 000 ACRYRYNUMBEP f.97-97'794-mR4-��m � FINANCIqLINFOGiMAT10N:(EXPIAIN) B, AST = 360i C, CPB g7 = 50a0a0 June 25, 1997, City Council Agenda c� ��- $� � �' �� Page 10 85. Final Order - 97-817 - In the matter of sidewalk reconstruction on both sides of Alameda Street from West lowa Avenue to Califomia Avenue; the south side of West Arlington Avenue from Galtier Street to Farrington Street; both sides of Como Place from Hatch Avenue to West Jessamine Avenue; the north side of West Cook Avenue from Gattier Street to Matilda Street; tfie east side of Galtier Street from Wayzata Street to Front Avenue and the west side of Galtier Street from Stinson Street to �ront Avenue; both sides of Hatch Avenue from fVorth Victoria Street to North Milton Street, the east side of North Milton Street from Front Avenue to Hatch Avenue and the west side of North vctoria Street from Front Avenue to Hatch Avenue; both sides of Huron Street from West Arlington Avenue to West Hoyt Avenue; both sides of Matilda Street from West Lawson Avenue to West Cook Avenue; both sides of Matilda Street from West Maryland Avenue to West Ivy Avenue; both sides of Maywood Street from West Wheelock Parkway to West Cottage Avenue; and both sides of Schletti Sfreet from West Cottage Avenue to West Arlington Avenue. (File #597052- S97062) �` � June 19, 1997 St.Paul City Council Public Hearing; Sidewaik Reconstruction - 6-25-97. 4:30 PM Property Address: 1405 Schletti St. St.Paul, MN F7emings Subo Lot I�, Parcel ID:24-29-23-32-0025 Dear Member of Finance Division, The sidewalk adjacent to our property has developed several sertous defects, that may affect the safety of the public. As we71 as our own safety. We vote YES for a new sidewalk. Especially young children on roller blades, andJor bicycles. It is esQecially dangerous for elderly people during in- clement weather, when ice and snow cover the defects. There are several places where the sidewalk has raised and cracked from tree roots, which are very dangerous. Thank you for your consideration of this problem_ �'F�; ;.. _ �� f Sincerely, � ,9 , . s . s -�, i `. . � « a � r .�.�-rC�� /`, � � Jo n& Lucille M. Kampa • Prooerty Owners of 1405 Schletti Street ,,, St.Paul, MN 55117 R€CEf 488-0179 . JUN 2 4 t997 ` '� �� r�L�it'�:: SUNIMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATIONS Ward 5 a�-�� PROJECT: REC011TSTRUCT SIDEWALH B.S. ALAMEDA ST. from W. Iowa Ave. to W. California Ave. p IIvITIATII�IG ACTIO2�i: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works � t��Z as public necessity on the basis of two (2} complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING COPiDITIOPi3: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaes, asphalt patches, disintegrated, scaled, settled and cracked panels. ................................................................... �ROJECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALH S.S W. ARLINGTON AVE. from Galtier St. to Farrington St. 5�� INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of three (e) complaints, a petition with one (1) signer and an inspection of the walk. EICISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, settled and cracked panels. ................................................................. PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALg B.S. COMO PL. from Hatch Ave. to W. Jessamine Ave. �?�5� IlvITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basisof five (5) complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves. asphalt patches, disintegrated, scaled, settled and cracked panels. PR03ECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK N.S. W. COOK AVE. from Galtier St. to Matilda St. �pM LL I1vITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public �(V J� Works as public necessity on the basis of three (3} complaints, a petition with one (1) signer and an inspection of the walk. E%ISTING CONDITIONS: This watk is poured concrete with asphait patches, disintegrated, scaled and settled panels. ................................................................... -2- al�� /7 PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK E.S. GALTIER ST. from Wayzata St. to Front Ave. & W.S. GALTIER ST: from Stinson St. to Front Ave. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works � qp�/. as pubHc necessity on the basis of four (4) complaints, a petition with one {1) 1 Y �J signer and an inspection of the walk. E%ISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, disintegrated, scaled and cracked paneis. ................................................................... PROJECT: RECONSTR[3CT SIDEWALg B.S. HATCH AVE. from N. Victoria St. to N. Miiton St., E.S. N. MILTON ST. from Front Ave to Hatch Ave. & W.S. N. VICTfJRtA ST. from F�ont Ave. to Hatch Ave. �9�� IIvITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of three {g} compiaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, settled and cracked panels. ................................................................... PRf1.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. HURON ST. from W. Arlington Ave. to W. Hoyt Ave. IIvITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works ��0� gublic necessity on the basis of seven t7) complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphait patches, scaled, settted and cracked panels. ................................................................... PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALS B.S. MATILDA ST. from W. I.awson Ave. to W. Cook Ave. C, 4/j(y� INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works ✓`( V!� as public necessity on the basis of two (2) complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CQNDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, water pockets, asphalt patches, scaled and settled panels. ................................................................... PROJECT• RECONSTRBCT SIDEWALH B.S. MATILDA ST: from W. Maryland Ave. to W. Ivy Ave. -3- �� IIvITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as publlc necessity on the basis of eight {8l complaints, a petition with one (1) �� signer and an inspection of the walk. E%ISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, water pockets, asphalt patches, scaled and settled panels. ................................................................... B.S. MAYWOOD Si: from W. Wheelock Fkwy. to W. Cottage Ave. __��' � TING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works Jp as public necessity on the basis of four (4) complaints and an inspection of the EIIISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, disintegrated, scaled, setded and cracked panels. ................................................................... PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALS B.S. SCHLETTI ST. from W. Cottage Ave. to W. Arlington Ave. ��na4Z �TIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of seven (7} complaints, a petition with one (1) signer and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIOPIS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, scaled, settied and cracked panels. .................................................................. CITY OF ST. PAUL PRELIMINA.RY ORDER °l��F�r1 3r 9'7052-59'7062 In the Matter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following location(s): 597052 - Both sides o£ Alameda St from W Iowa Ave to W California Ave 597653 - South side of W Arlington Ave from Galtier St to Farrington St S9?054 - Both sides of Como Place from Hatch Ave to W Jessamine Ave 597055 - North side of W Cook Ave from Galtier St to Matilda St 597056 - East side o£ Galtier St £rom Wayzata St to Front Ave & the West side of Galtier St from Stinson St to Front Ave 597057 - Both sides of Hatch Ave from N Victoria St to N Milton St, ' East side N Milton St from Front Ave to Hatch Ave & West side N Victoria St from Front Ave to Hatch Ave 597058 - Both sides Huron St from W Arlington Ave to W Hoyt Ave 597059 - Both sides Matilda St from W Lawson Ave to W Cook Ave 597060 - Both sides Matilda St from W Maryland Ave to W Ivy Ave 597061 - Both sides Maywood St from W Wheelock Pkwy to W Cottage Ave 597062 - Both sicles Schletti St from W Cottage Ave to W Arlington Ave q�- �� : *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RA2'E5 RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.45 per front foot for a £ive (5) £oot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New aonstruction {where no walk existed) - 100$ of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" o£ the property. MULTI-RESIDEI3TIAL(More than three family structures), NpN-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1�0� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated consCruction rates, financed by assessments and 1997 Public Improvement Aid. 2 3 That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 25th day o£ June, 1997, at 4:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said pul�lic hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays ✓lakey �/fiostrom ;it?arris ,iMegard ;iNiorton �I'hune ,� bl\��.5 l In Favor �Against Adopted by Council: Date Q� -�U �� Certified Passed by Council Secretary BY "�� •� . �f`��_r�..., � Mayor _ .� � ,, , _ � � �. ( � � ✓� � \ �� i�_� .... __.. . .€� ; __ ---� � :� � � `,� �J � � ` w � _ <.� �.� --.; w .: �'r_ f �:-c � , � . � ' � ,� ,.- ; �:.. � : `� T=� r �� .-� • � � � .,,9 �`^. 3t?, `� } �' s y . � yy .a„ .-.+.. ' � .. � r�, y;: �' F":a t -�. `'y 5 �'v e:.� -�<l - � y �-. r . � ��.. �!' a . � _tv [� n`*" .. . �4�3l�C _ ¢` . � � �� '� �� . ��'- r"w <.4 _� �' ��. � � � �\ � ;- _ �. � � , � -- ,- - a_- ,. : . - :i, � r _ _ - ->� ` , '..' rt � - - �- ,;. _ _ � i � - _ '�_ ,� , � �� " "' — � �- E �� - � _ 1rj t �{ 1'ti[< t. �_ ' . - . )s '. ��// • L Ni y • Yi / /�k � * � x � - � � ��fs �. .. � �• � >. �.� � � � � l � j . - " t �j , sj.J 5(. ✓:. - ..� ^ � �'w�. _ " t, ", rt�s' 4, � j _ L , _... ^�,f�t »' 1 ; _ _ � � �.� . • 1. 1 � t�- �j: I 1C\.� � � . r -+�' � . .. � . \ � � i ` �� - �� r �, �� i ,�u I S-� �'" - t ' I _ � . ` ��I{� " + � y . �� - - �. -�� .'��_..�.-�..`�-'.�.-�`�..� ;i_' .. .� '�° ".''�.^'�_�s�" .,,- 1 . �_. ',_ .> �' ,. . . �. - � . , _ _.,. .- .. '- tr' ^ F� ...._. I . �. ,. � �..� '..��'.. ��,.� � ' � `�� i �ti�� ' �.. _!fi . . r . : < �.�= �: �..a....: �,.' _... ,:.�,�� .: ��..i t. .._ _' . . . _ __ ��.: ��ca:_ �