Loading...
97-816C2TY OF ST. PAUI, FINAL ORDER ��a �� � ��-S ��� COUNCIL FILE NO. � ~ !� g� By File No. 597049-5 O51 Voting Ward 4 Ia the Matter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following location(s)_ 597049 - East side of N Fairview Ave from Englewood Ave to Hubbard Ave, West side of N Fairview Ave from Englewood Ave to Chelton Ave k West side N Fairview Ave from Chelton Ave to Clayland P1 at 789 N Fairview Ave only 597050 - S97051 - Ave *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES St to N Wheeler St � l0.0 e1 e RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structuresJ Reconstxvction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.45 per front £oot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. Nem construction (where no walk existed) - 100°s of the actual cost estimated to be ' approximately $3.33 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewal7c along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RE5IDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100$ of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. under Preliminary order � � — �� � The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESQLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all e�penses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter_ COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays +�lakey +/�ostrom ✓arris ✓�egard �orton ✓7'fiune Cd\,�ns-- (`ihSey�ct' �o In Favor � Against t ��S2Y�� Adopted by Council: Date °`��q�`� Certified Passed by Council Secretary By �._ �' s � C�� _ U� Mayor - Public Hearing Date - June 25, 19�?7 RE 4-18-97 q � � f '� ^q -�f� DEPARTMENT/OFFICE/CqUNCIL DATEINITIATED GREEN SHEET NO. `�LG`�� Public Works Sidewalks 4-10-97 u�iTinwATE INITIpVDATE CONTACTPERSON&PHONE OEPAHTMENTDIRECTOR �Gf7YCOUNCIL Robert A. Lissick - 266-6127 +�N cm anoa�uEV � cm ra EaK MUS7 HE ON COUNCIL AGENDA 8Y (DAlE) NUMBER PoR 5-�-9� ��T�� BUDGETDIRECTOR ❑FIN.BMGT.SFAVICESDIR. Must be in Council Research Office � MAVOR(ORASSISTANn 0 Coundl Research no later than noon Frida 4-25-97 TOTAL Y OF SIGNANHE PAGES I _(CL7P ALL LOCA710115 FOR SiGNANRt7 � ASSOCU7E ENiAL MCAUNTANf ACTION REWESTED ') �' � Y J Reconstruct Sidewalk in Wasd 4(See attached list) � � 9 -5 REC�MMENDpTpNS: Pppa�e �pla �AU �) PERSONAL SERYICE COMRACTS M113T ANSWER THE WLLOWING QUESTIONS: PUINNING COAdMIS510N ` GNiL SEAV7CE fAMMISSiON 1. Fias ihi5 pMSOtVfl Ne worked Under a conVac[ far tt�i5 d6Partrnen[? VE a8 C01AMrtiEE 2. Has this��� rm ever been a cdy employee? EY S NO A 57AFF 3. Dces this personlfirm possess a skill nat normalfy possessed try any curcen[ ciry — employee? OISTAICiCWNCII�I�''IJ _ YES NO SUPPQRTS Wk11CH CWNCIyL�ECTNE4 ExPa�^ a11 yas answers on separna sheet and attaohto groan sheet INI TING PROBLEM. ISSUE, OPPORTUNITY (WNO, WHAT. WHEN, WHEPE, WHY): The problem "defective sidewalk" was created because ofi tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, aRernating freeRhaw cycles, service I'rfe limfts, chemicat additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a cftywide level and must be addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk conddion would worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusable and subject to increased pedestrian i�juries from falls and possible litigations. ADVANTAGESIFAPPROVED: The community will benefft from this project because it will prwide sale detect free sidewalks for its many citizens. The sidewalk contracts are executed by private contractors, so it fiollows that private sector jobs are created as a resuft of this activity. i,:�',p�::?`. .. .. _--,,. �. ,._i'a'<. �'�. .o ... �- :.`..����d DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED: Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback irt the area of coas4rusFiqn•p[oced�c�afrcia ��ss��sment. Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to ane-half the assessment is City su6sidized, it still remains coMrovarsial. DISA�VANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED; This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, wiN generate more personal injury suits, uRimately resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in eventual repairs and/or replacement, as weil as claim payouts. TOTALAMWNf OFTRANSAGTpNi 12.268 � 66 COST/REVENUE BUDGETED (CIpCLE ONE) YE No FUNDINGSWqCE �7'^{"{—�6b] 1� Q�){ �� = 557,Q�Q pCRyRyNUMHEH Cg7�2T729-o7�4-270)2 FINANCIALMFORMATION:(EXPLAIN) ��� AST P .jOO C ��� 47 � �d���0 q�-�1� CITY OF ST. PAUL COUNCIL FILE NO. -' PRELIMII3ARY ORDER BY.���d��,�������,� �D File No__597049-5 Y7051 Voting Ward_4 In the Matter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following location(s): 597049 - East side of N Fairview Ave from Englewood Ave to Hubbard Ave, West side o£ N Fairview Ave from Englewood Ave to Chelton Ave & West side N Pairview Ave from Chelton Ave to Clayland Pl at 789 N Fairview Ave only 597050 - Both sides of Montrose Place £rom Dayton Ave to Marshall Ave S97051 - Nortl side of Thomas Ave from Aldine St to N WYaeeler St *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.45 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk_ Al1 other widths wi11 be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� oE the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. A11 corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), I30N-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1DOg of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: � 2 3 That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1997 Public Improvement Aid. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 25th day of June, 1997, at 4:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court Aouse Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays �akey ✓�os trom ;iF�arr i s :�Plegard r�IvTOrton ,�hune �� l\: <. s � In Favor � Against Adopted by Council: Date � 3G \�(�{r't 1 Certified Passed by Council Secretary B �' �- a 1� ._�..,�..>_ c � Mayor SUMMARY OF EIVGINEERING RECOMMENDATI�NS Ward 4 7q�0'�{ a�� ��1� pRO��'-�"�'• Rt±'-�`ONSTRIICT SIDEWi�K E.S. N. FAII2VIEW AVE. from Englewood Ave. to Hubbard Ave., W.S. N. FAIRVIEW AVE. from Englewood Ave. to Chelton Ave. & W.S. N. FAIRVIEW AVE. from Chelton Ave, to Clayland Pl. at 789 N. Fairview Ave. Only. IIVITIATING ACTION: Th�s order was init�ated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint, a petition with one {1) signer and an inspection of the walk. E%ISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphait patches and settled panels. ................................................................... PROJECT: REGONSTRUCT SIDEWALS B.S. MONTROSE PL. from Dayton Ave. to Marshall Ave. ��� I1�iIT1ATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of one {1) complaint, a petition with one (1) signer and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete wittx tree heaves> scaled, settled, spalled and cracked panels. ................................................................... PROJECT: REGONSTRUCT SIDEWALK N.S. THOMAS AVE, from A�dine St. ,n�y�� to N. Wheeler St. "< <V IIvITIATING ACTION: Ti1is order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of three (3J complaints and an inspection of the walk. E%ISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphait patches, scaled, setfled and cracked panels. ................................................................... C2TY OF ST. PAUI, FINAL ORDER ��a �� � ��-S ��� COUNCIL FILE NO. � ~ !� g� By File No. 597049-5 O51 Voting Ward 4 Ia the Matter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following location(s)_ 597049 - East side of N Fairview Ave from Englewood Ave to Hubbard Ave, West side of N Fairview Ave from Englewood Ave to Chelton Ave k West side N Fairview Ave from Chelton Ave to Clayland P1 at 789 N Fairview Ave only 597050 - S97051 - Ave *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES St to N Wheeler St � l0.0 e1 e RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structuresJ Reconstxvction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.45 per front £oot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. Nem construction (where no walk existed) - 100°s of the actual cost estimated to be ' approximately $3.33 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewal7c along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RE5IDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100$ of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. under Preliminary order � � — �� � The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESQLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all e�penses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter_ COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays +�lakey +/�ostrom ✓arris ✓�egard �orton ✓7'fiune Cd\,�ns-- (`ihSey�ct' �o In Favor � Against t ��S2Y�� Adopted by Council: Date °`��q�`� Certified Passed by Council Secretary By �._ �' s � C�� _ U� Mayor - Public Hearing Date - June 25, 19�?7 RE 4-18-97 q � � f '� ^q -�f� DEPARTMENT/OFFICE/CqUNCIL DATEINITIATED GREEN SHEET NO. `�LG`�� Public Works Sidewalks 4-10-97 u�iTinwATE INITIpVDATE CONTACTPERSON&PHONE OEPAHTMENTDIRECTOR �Gf7YCOUNCIL Robert A. Lissick - 266-6127 +�N cm anoa�uEV � cm ra EaK MUS7 HE ON COUNCIL AGENDA 8Y (DAlE) NUMBER PoR 5-�-9� ��T�� BUDGETDIRECTOR ❑FIN.BMGT.SFAVICESDIR. Must be in Council Research Office � MAVOR(ORASSISTANn 0 Coundl Research no later than noon Frida 4-25-97 TOTAL Y OF SIGNANHE PAGES I _(CL7P ALL LOCA710115 FOR SiGNANRt7 � ASSOCU7E ENiAL MCAUNTANf ACTION REWESTED ') �' � Y J Reconstruct Sidewalk in Wasd 4(See attached list) � � 9 -5 REC�MMENDpTpNS: Pppa�e �pla �AU �) PERSONAL SERYICE COMRACTS M113T ANSWER THE WLLOWING QUESTIONS: PUINNING COAdMIS510N ` GNiL SEAV7CE fAMMISSiON 1. Fias ihi5 pMSOtVfl Ne worked Under a conVac[ far tt�i5 d6Partrnen[? VE a8 C01AMrtiEE 2. Has this��� rm ever been a cdy employee? EY S NO A 57AFF 3. Dces this personlfirm possess a skill nat normalfy possessed try any curcen[ ciry — employee? OISTAICiCWNCII�I�''IJ _ YES NO SUPPQRTS Wk11CH CWNCIyL�ECTNE4 ExPa�^ a11 yas answers on separna sheet and attaohto groan sheet INI TING PROBLEM. ISSUE, OPPORTUNITY (WNO, WHAT. WHEN, WHEPE, WHY): The problem "defective sidewalk" was created because ofi tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, aRernating freeRhaw cycles, service I'rfe limfts, chemicat additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a cftywide level and must be addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk conddion would worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusable and subject to increased pedestrian i�juries from falls and possible litigations. ADVANTAGESIFAPPROVED: The community will benefft from this project because it will prwide sale detect free sidewalks for its many citizens. The sidewalk contracts are executed by private contractors, so it fiollows that private sector jobs are created as a resuft of this activity. i,:�',p�::?`. .. .. _--,,. �. ,._i'a'<. �'�. .o ... �- :.`..����d DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED: Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback irt the area of coas4rusFiqn•p[oced�c�afrcia ��ss��sment. Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to ane-half the assessment is City su6sidized, it still remains coMrovarsial. DISA�VANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED; This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, wiN generate more personal injury suits, uRimately resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in eventual repairs and/or replacement, as weil as claim payouts. TOTALAMWNf OFTRANSAGTpNi 12.268 � 66 COST/REVENUE BUDGETED (CIpCLE ONE) YE No FUNDINGSWqCE �7'^{"{—�6b] 1� Q�){ �� = 557,Q�Q pCRyRyNUMHEH Cg7�2T729-o7�4-270)2 FINANCIALMFORMATION:(EXPLAIN) ��� AST P .jOO C ��� 47 � �d���0 q�-�1� CITY OF ST. PAUL COUNCIL FILE NO. -' PRELIMII3ARY ORDER BY.���d��,�������,� �D File No__597049-5 Y7051 Voting Ward_4 In the Matter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following location(s): 597049 - East side of N Fairview Ave from Englewood Ave to Hubbard Ave, West side o£ N Fairview Ave from Englewood Ave to Chelton Ave & West side N Pairview Ave from Chelton Ave to Clayland Pl at 789 N Fairview Ave only 597050 - Both sides of Montrose Place £rom Dayton Ave to Marshall Ave S97051 - Nortl side of Thomas Ave from Aldine St to N WYaeeler St *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.45 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk_ Al1 other widths wi11 be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� oE the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. A11 corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), I30N-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1DOg of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: � 2 3 That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1997 Public Improvement Aid. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 25th day of June, 1997, at 4:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court Aouse Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays �akey ✓�os trom ;iF�arr i s :�Plegard r�IvTOrton ,�hune �� l\: <. s � In Favor � Against Adopted by Council: Date � 3G \�(�{r't 1 Certified Passed by Council Secretary B �' �- a 1� ._�..,�..>_ c � Mayor SUMMARY OF EIVGINEERING RECOMMENDATI�NS Ward 4 7q�0'�{ a�� ��1� pRO��'-�"�'• Rt±'-�`ONSTRIICT SIDEWi�K E.S. N. FAII2VIEW AVE. from Englewood Ave. to Hubbard Ave., W.S. N. FAIRVIEW AVE. from Englewood Ave. to Chelton Ave. & W.S. N. FAIRVIEW AVE. from Chelton Ave, to Clayland Pl. at 789 N. Fairview Ave. Only. IIVITIATING ACTION: Th�s order was init�ated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint, a petition with one {1) signer and an inspection of the walk. E%ISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphait patches and settled panels. ................................................................... PROJECT: REGONSTRUCT SIDEWALS B.S. MONTROSE PL. from Dayton Ave. to Marshall Ave. ��� I1�iIT1ATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of one {1) complaint, a petition with one (1) signer and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete wittx tree heaves> scaled, settled, spalled and cracked panels. ................................................................... PROJECT: REGONSTRUCT SIDEWALK N.S. THOMAS AVE, from A�dine St. ,n�y�� to N. Wheeler St. "< <V IIvITIATING ACTION: Ti1is order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of three (3J complaints and an inspection of the walk. E%ISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphait patches, scaled, setfled and cracked panels. ................................................................... C2TY OF ST. PAUI, FINAL ORDER ��a �� � ��-S ��� COUNCIL FILE NO. � ~ !� g� By File No. 597049-5 O51 Voting Ward 4 Ia the Matter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following location(s)_ 597049 - East side of N Fairview Ave from Englewood Ave to Hubbard Ave, West side of N Fairview Ave from Englewood Ave to Chelton Ave k West side N Fairview Ave from Chelton Ave to Clayland P1 at 789 N Fairview Ave only 597050 - S97051 - Ave *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES St to N Wheeler St � l0.0 e1 e RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structuresJ Reconstxvction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.45 per front £oot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. Nem construction (where no walk existed) - 100°s of the actual cost estimated to be ' approximately $3.33 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewal7c along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RE5IDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100$ of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. under Preliminary order � � — �� � The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESQLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all e�penses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter_ COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays +�lakey +/�ostrom ✓arris ✓�egard �orton ✓7'fiune Cd\,�ns-- (`ihSey�ct' �o In Favor � Against t ��S2Y�� Adopted by Council: Date °`��q�`� Certified Passed by Council Secretary By �._ �' s � C�� _ U� Mayor - Public Hearing Date - June 25, 19�?7 RE 4-18-97 q � � f '� ^q -�f� DEPARTMENT/OFFICE/CqUNCIL DATEINITIATED GREEN SHEET NO. `�LG`�� Public Works Sidewalks 4-10-97 u�iTinwATE INITIpVDATE CONTACTPERSON&PHONE OEPAHTMENTDIRECTOR �Gf7YCOUNCIL Robert A. Lissick - 266-6127 +�N cm anoa�uEV � cm ra EaK MUS7 HE ON COUNCIL AGENDA 8Y (DAlE) NUMBER PoR 5-�-9� ��T�� BUDGETDIRECTOR ❑FIN.BMGT.SFAVICESDIR. Must be in Council Research Office � MAVOR(ORASSISTANn 0 Coundl Research no later than noon Frida 4-25-97 TOTAL Y OF SIGNANHE PAGES I _(CL7P ALL LOCA710115 FOR SiGNANRt7 � ASSOCU7E ENiAL MCAUNTANf ACTION REWESTED ') �' � Y J Reconstruct Sidewalk in Wasd 4(See attached list) � � 9 -5 REC�MMENDpTpNS: Pppa�e �pla �AU �) PERSONAL SERYICE COMRACTS M113T ANSWER THE WLLOWING QUESTIONS: PUINNING COAdMIS510N ` GNiL SEAV7CE fAMMISSiON 1. Fias ihi5 pMSOtVfl Ne worked Under a conVac[ far tt�i5 d6Partrnen[? VE a8 C01AMrtiEE 2. Has this��� rm ever been a cdy employee? EY S NO A 57AFF 3. Dces this personlfirm possess a skill nat normalfy possessed try any curcen[ ciry — employee? OISTAICiCWNCII�I�''IJ _ YES NO SUPPQRTS Wk11CH CWNCIyL�ECTNE4 ExPa�^ a11 yas answers on separna sheet and attaohto groan sheet INI TING PROBLEM. ISSUE, OPPORTUNITY (WNO, WHAT. WHEN, WHEPE, WHY): The problem "defective sidewalk" was created because ofi tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, aRernating freeRhaw cycles, service I'rfe limfts, chemicat additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a cftywide level and must be addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk conddion would worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusable and subject to increased pedestrian i�juries from falls and possible litigations. ADVANTAGESIFAPPROVED: The community will benefft from this project because it will prwide sale detect free sidewalks for its many citizens. The sidewalk contracts are executed by private contractors, so it fiollows that private sector jobs are created as a resuft of this activity. i,:�',p�::?`. .. .. _--,,. �. ,._i'a'<. �'�. .o ... �- :.`..����d DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED: Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback irt the area of coas4rusFiqn•p[oced�c�afrcia ��ss��sment. Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to ane-half the assessment is City su6sidized, it still remains coMrovarsial. DISA�VANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED; This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, wiN generate more personal injury suits, uRimately resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in eventual repairs and/or replacement, as weil as claim payouts. TOTALAMWNf OFTRANSAGTpNi 12.268 � 66 COST/REVENUE BUDGETED (CIpCLE ONE) YE No FUNDINGSWqCE �7'^{"{—�6b] 1� Q�){ �� = 557,Q�Q pCRyRyNUMHEH Cg7�2T729-o7�4-270)2 FINANCIALMFORMATION:(EXPLAIN) ��� AST P .jOO C ��� 47 � �d���0 q�-�1� CITY OF ST. PAUL COUNCIL FILE NO. -' PRELIMII3ARY ORDER BY.���d��,�������,� �D File No__597049-5 Y7051 Voting Ward_4 In the Matter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following location(s): 597049 - East side of N Fairview Ave from Englewood Ave to Hubbard Ave, West side o£ N Fairview Ave from Englewood Ave to Chelton Ave & West side N Pairview Ave from Chelton Ave to Clayland Pl at 789 N Fairview Ave only 597050 - Both sides of Montrose Place £rom Dayton Ave to Marshall Ave S97051 - Nortl side of Thomas Ave from Aldine St to N WYaeeler St *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.45 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk_ Al1 other widths wi11 be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� oE the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. A11 corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), I30N-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1DOg of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: � 2 3 That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1997 Public Improvement Aid. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 25th day of June, 1997, at 4:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court Aouse Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays �akey ✓�os trom ;iF�arr i s :�Plegard r�IvTOrton ,�hune �� l\: <. s � In Favor � Against Adopted by Council: Date � 3G \�(�{r't 1 Certified Passed by Council Secretary B �' �- a 1� ._�..,�..>_ c � Mayor SUMMARY OF EIVGINEERING RECOMMENDATI�NS Ward 4 7q�0'�{ a�� ��1� pRO��'-�"�'• Rt±'-�`ONSTRIICT SIDEWi�K E.S. N. FAII2VIEW AVE. from Englewood Ave. to Hubbard Ave., W.S. N. FAIRVIEW AVE. from Englewood Ave. to Chelton Ave. & W.S. N. FAIRVIEW AVE. from Chelton Ave, to Clayland Pl. at 789 N. Fairview Ave. Only. IIVITIATING ACTION: Th�s order was init�ated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint, a petition with one {1) signer and an inspection of the walk. E%ISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphait patches and settled panels. ................................................................... PROJECT: REGONSTRUCT SIDEWALS B.S. MONTROSE PL. from Dayton Ave. to Marshall Ave. ��� I1�iIT1ATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of one {1) complaint, a petition with one (1) signer and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete wittx tree heaves> scaled, settled, spalled and cracked panels. ................................................................... PROJECT: REGONSTRUCT SIDEWALK N.S. THOMAS AVE, from A�dine St. ,n�y�� to N. Wheeler St. "< <V IIvITIATING ACTION: Ti1is order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of three (3J complaints and an inspection of the walk. E%ISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphait patches, scaled, setfled and cracked panels. ...................................................................