Loading...
97-815CITY OF ST. PAUL COUN ILE. NO. � � �� FINAL ORDER By ��- Fi1e No. 597048 Voting Ward 3 Ia the Matter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following location(s): 597048 - South sicle of Hart£ord Ave from S Pascal St to Warwick St *E5TIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstructiou (replacement of o1d sidewalk) -$7_45 ger front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction {where no walk existed) - 1000 of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot_ All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately 54.50 per square foot. under Preliminary The Council above improvement Charter; and of the City of 5aint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the , due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all e�enses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas � Nays +/B�l key ��ostrom iil�rris �gard �rton �jPrune Ca\ � � y�S - t Adopted by Council: Date�\���1� Certified Passed by Council Secretary �In Favor By � �� �...��o..�, Q � ... �_Against � � 1 � Mayor _ ��S Q 1-� 1� � 'Public Aearing Dat - June 25, 1 997 RE 4-18-97 q1 -$'�S' OEPARTMENi/OFFICE/COUNCIL DA7EINRUITED GREEN SHEET r,o. �22�s Public Works Sidewalks 4-10-97 winnuoare MfT1AllDATE CONTACTPEfiSONBPHONE DEPANTMENTDIRECTOR CfTYCAUNC1l Robert A. Liss'�cfc - 2666121 ��N � cm arroarrer cm cLEp�c AIUSTBEONCOUNC7LAGENDABY(DATE) 5_7_97 � g�JpGE7DIRECTOR FIN,SMGT.SFAVICESDIR. Must be in Council ResearcIi Office MAVOR(ORASSISTANn � Coundl Ftesearch by noon Frida 4-25-97 � TOTAL Y OF SIGNATUAE PA6ES ]. _�CL1P ALL LOCAl10N5 FOR SIGNANHq � A3SOCIASE P NTAL ACCOLiNTANT qC7loNREWES7ED - I - �Jj� Reconstruct Sidewalk in Ward 3(See �tached Iist) FECWIMENDA'floNS: Aawwe Wl orReiart fFl PEHSONAL SERVlCE CONTRACTS 1dUST ANSW£R 7NE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS: _ PLANNING COMM1SS101V _��SERVICE COIAMlSS10N 1. Nas ihis pei Ne worked under a contr�t for U�is department? Y CIB CqAMIT�EE 2. Has fiis person/Frm ever been a ary employee? — — YES NQ A STAFF c _ 3. Does 7his persoMfirm possess a skill not normalty possessed by any current ciry _DIS'rRiCTCOUNCII�`J _ employse? YES NO SUPPORTS WHICH CWNGL OBJECTNE? ExP�ein eli yes eifSWafs on SepBrrMe SheBl a[M ettach to greetl shaet 7 INITIA ING PROBLEM. ISSUE. OPPOFTUNITY (WHO, WHAT, WHEN. WHERE. WH17: The problem "defsctive sidewalk" was created because ot trea raots, deleterious subgrade material, afternating freefthaw cycles, service 1'rfe limits, chemical addi[ives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide fevel and must be addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewaik cond'Rion wouid worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusable a�d subjed to increased pedestrian injuries from talis and possible litigations. ADVANTAGES IF 0.PPROYEO: The communfty will benefit from this project because it will provide safe detect free sidewalks for its many citizens. The sidewalk coniraets are executad by private contrac[ors, so i[ folbws that private sector jobs are created as a result of this activity. DISADVAN�AGES IF APPROVED: Historicalfy, the sidewafk recnnstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment. Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it still remains controversiaL �� ;-,;;o=�E "�-��;, �;�r �{�.����° ��so.:.__,._. :_...a :�? � � r. r .'.: 'tr e. ^ �`��f DISADVANTAGE$ IF NOT APPROVED: , ; �: ,.._ . ��- ` This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal injury suits, uRimately resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in eventual repairs and/or replacement, as weil as claim payouts. TOTALAMOUMOFTRANSACTION$ � y ]� !�Q COST/REVENUEBUDGETED(CIHCLEONE) YES NO FUNDINGSOURCE 9�-�j A PIA 47 � 5�7 ACINITYNUMBER C97-2T729-0784-27012 FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (EXPLAIN) B R AST �.300 �.O�O C, Cts 97 = 5fl,0o0 ��-��s CITY QF 9T. PAUL COUN� FI E� �U PRELIMINARY ORDER gy "'�` _1^ File No._597048 �l� � Voting Ward_3 2n the Matter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following location(s): 597048 - South side of Hartford Ave from S Pascal St to Warwick St *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.45 per front foot for a five i5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide wa1k. A11 other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. The Council o£ the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 7 2 K3 That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1997 Public Improvement Aid. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 25th day of June, 1997, at 4:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice o£ said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSON5 Yeas Nays Blakey �s trom �rris �gard ;�Nf6rton �'Phune �/��.1\i � �In Favor � Against Adopted by Council: Date�.—� A JCZ ��{9'� 1 � Certified Passed by Council Secretary BY �� s � ��r `� �, � � Mayor SIIMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATION Ot �_��� Ward 3 PROJECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALH S.S. HAKfFORD AVE, from S. Pascal St. to Warwick St. ����� INITIATING ACTIOl�i: T'his order was initiated hy the Birector of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of a petition with one (1) signer and an inspeetion of the walk. EXISTING CUPIDITION5: This walk is poured concrete with heaves, scaled, spalled and settled panels. ................................................................... CITY OF ST. PAUL COUN ILE. NO. � � �� FINAL ORDER By ��- Fi1e No. 597048 Voting Ward 3 Ia the Matter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following location(s): 597048 - South sicle of Hart£ord Ave from S Pascal St to Warwick St *E5TIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstructiou (replacement of o1d sidewalk) -$7_45 ger front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction {where no walk existed) - 1000 of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot_ All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately 54.50 per square foot. under Preliminary The Council above improvement Charter; and of the City of 5aint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the , due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all e�enses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas � Nays +/B�l key ��ostrom iil�rris �gard �rton �jPrune Ca\ � � y�S - t Adopted by Council: Date�\���1� Certified Passed by Council Secretary �In Favor By � �� �...��o..�, Q � ... �_Against � � 1 � Mayor _ ��S Q 1-� 1� � 'Public Aearing Dat - June 25, 1 997 RE 4-18-97 q1 -$'�S' OEPARTMENi/OFFICE/COUNCIL DA7EINRUITED GREEN SHEET r,o. �22�s Public Works Sidewalks 4-10-97 winnuoare MfT1AllDATE CONTACTPEfiSONBPHONE DEPANTMENTDIRECTOR CfTYCAUNC1l Robert A. Liss'�cfc - 2666121 ��N � cm arroarrer cm cLEp�c AIUSTBEONCOUNC7LAGENDABY(DATE) 5_7_97 � g�JpGE7DIRECTOR FIN,SMGT.SFAVICESDIR. Must be in Council ResearcIi Office MAVOR(ORASSISTANn � Coundl Ftesearch by noon Frida 4-25-97 � TOTAL Y OF SIGNATUAE PA6ES ]. _�CL1P ALL LOCAl10N5 FOR SIGNANHq � A3SOCIASE P NTAL ACCOLiNTANT qC7loNREWES7ED - I - �Jj� Reconstruct Sidewalk in Ward 3(See �tached Iist) FECWIMENDA'floNS: Aawwe Wl orReiart fFl PEHSONAL SERVlCE CONTRACTS 1dUST ANSW£R 7NE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS: _ PLANNING COMM1SS101V _��SERVICE COIAMlSS10N 1. Nas ihis pei Ne worked under a contr�t for U�is department? Y CIB CqAMIT�EE 2. Has fiis person/Frm ever been a ary employee? — — YES NQ A STAFF c _ 3. Does 7his persoMfirm possess a skill not normalty possessed by any current ciry _DIS'rRiCTCOUNCII�`J _ employse? YES NO SUPPORTS WHICH CWNGL OBJECTNE? ExP�ein eli yes eifSWafs on SepBrrMe SheBl a[M ettach to greetl shaet 7 INITIA ING PROBLEM. ISSUE. OPPOFTUNITY (WHO, WHAT, WHEN. WHERE. WH17: The problem "defsctive sidewalk" was created because ot trea raots, deleterious subgrade material, afternating freefthaw cycles, service 1'rfe limits, chemical addi[ives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide fevel and must be addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewaik cond'Rion wouid worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusable a�d subjed to increased pedestrian injuries from talis and possible litigations. ADVANTAGES IF 0.PPROYEO: The communfty will benefit from this project because it will provide safe detect free sidewalks for its many citizens. The sidewalk coniraets are executad by private contrac[ors, so i[ folbws that private sector jobs are created as a result of this activity. DISADVAN�AGES IF APPROVED: Historicalfy, the sidewafk recnnstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment. Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it still remains controversiaL �� ;-,;;o=�E "�-��;, �;�r �{�.����° ��so.:.__,._. :_...a :�? � � r. r .'.: 'tr e. ^ �`��f DISADVANTAGE$ IF NOT APPROVED: , ; �: ,.._ . ��- ` This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal injury suits, uRimately resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in eventual repairs and/or replacement, as weil as claim payouts. TOTALAMOUMOFTRANSACTION$ � y ]� !�Q COST/REVENUEBUDGETED(CIHCLEONE) YES NO FUNDINGSOURCE 9�-�j A PIA 47 � 5�7 ACINITYNUMBER C97-2T729-0784-27012 FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (EXPLAIN) B R AST �.300 �.O�O C, Cts 97 = 5fl,0o0 ��-��s CITY QF 9T. PAUL COUN� FI E� �U PRELIMINARY ORDER gy "'�` _1^ File No._597048 �l� � Voting Ward_3 2n the Matter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following location(s): 597048 - South side of Hartford Ave from S Pascal St to Warwick St *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.45 per front foot for a five i5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide wa1k. A11 other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. The Council o£ the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 7 2 K3 That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1997 Public Improvement Aid. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 25th day of June, 1997, at 4:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice o£ said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSON5 Yeas Nays Blakey �s trom �rris �gard ;�Nf6rton �'Phune �/��.1\i � �In Favor � Against Adopted by Council: Date�.—� A JCZ ��{9'� 1 � Certified Passed by Council Secretary BY �� s � ��r `� �, � � Mayor SIIMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATION Ot �_��� Ward 3 PROJECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALH S.S. HAKfFORD AVE, from S. Pascal St. to Warwick St. ����� INITIATING ACTIOl�i: T'his order was initiated hy the Birector of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of a petition with one (1) signer and an inspeetion of the walk. EXISTING CUPIDITION5: This walk is poured concrete with heaves, scaled, spalled and settled panels. ................................................................... CITY OF ST. PAUL COUN ILE. NO. � � �� FINAL ORDER By ��- Fi1e No. 597048 Voting Ward 3 Ia the Matter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following location(s): 597048 - South sicle of Hart£ord Ave from S Pascal St to Warwick St *E5TIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstructiou (replacement of o1d sidewalk) -$7_45 ger front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction {where no walk existed) - 1000 of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot_ All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately 54.50 per square foot. under Preliminary The Council above improvement Charter; and of the City of 5aint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the , due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all e�enses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas � Nays +/B�l key ��ostrom iil�rris �gard �rton �jPrune Ca\ � � y�S - t Adopted by Council: Date�\���1� Certified Passed by Council Secretary �In Favor By � �� �...��o..�, Q � ... �_Against � � 1 � Mayor _ ��S Q 1-� 1� � 'Public Aearing Dat - June 25, 1 997 RE 4-18-97 q1 -$'�S' OEPARTMENi/OFFICE/COUNCIL DA7EINRUITED GREEN SHEET r,o. �22�s Public Works Sidewalks 4-10-97 winnuoare MfT1AllDATE CONTACTPEfiSONBPHONE DEPANTMENTDIRECTOR CfTYCAUNC1l Robert A. Liss'�cfc - 2666121 ��N � cm arroarrer cm cLEp�c AIUSTBEONCOUNC7LAGENDABY(DATE) 5_7_97 � g�JpGE7DIRECTOR FIN,SMGT.SFAVICESDIR. Must be in Council ResearcIi Office MAVOR(ORASSISTANn � Coundl Ftesearch by noon Frida 4-25-97 � TOTAL Y OF SIGNATUAE PA6ES ]. _�CL1P ALL LOCAl10N5 FOR SIGNANHq � A3SOCIASE P NTAL ACCOLiNTANT qC7loNREWES7ED - I - �Jj� Reconstruct Sidewalk in Ward 3(See �tached Iist) FECWIMENDA'floNS: Aawwe Wl orReiart fFl PEHSONAL SERVlCE CONTRACTS 1dUST ANSW£R 7NE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS: _ PLANNING COMM1SS101V _��SERVICE COIAMlSS10N 1. Nas ihis pei Ne worked under a contr�t for U�is department? Y CIB CqAMIT�EE 2. Has fiis person/Frm ever been a ary employee? — — YES NQ A STAFF c _ 3. Does 7his persoMfirm possess a skill not normalty possessed by any current ciry _DIS'rRiCTCOUNCII�`J _ employse? YES NO SUPPORTS WHICH CWNGL OBJECTNE? ExP�ein eli yes eifSWafs on SepBrrMe SheBl a[M ettach to greetl shaet 7 INITIA ING PROBLEM. ISSUE. OPPOFTUNITY (WHO, WHAT, WHEN. WHERE. WH17: The problem "defsctive sidewalk" was created because ot trea raots, deleterious subgrade material, afternating freefthaw cycles, service 1'rfe limits, chemical addi[ives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide fevel and must be addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewaik cond'Rion wouid worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusable a�d subjed to increased pedestrian injuries from talis and possible litigations. ADVANTAGES IF 0.PPROYEO: The communfty will benefit from this project because it will provide safe detect free sidewalks for its many citizens. The sidewalk coniraets are executad by private contrac[ors, so i[ folbws that private sector jobs are created as a result of this activity. DISADVAN�AGES IF APPROVED: Historicalfy, the sidewafk recnnstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment. Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it still remains controversiaL �� ;-,;;o=�E "�-��;, �;�r �{�.����° ��so.:.__,._. :_...a :�? � � r. r .'.: 'tr e. ^ �`��f DISADVANTAGE$ IF NOT APPROVED: , ; �: ,.._ . ��- ` This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal injury suits, uRimately resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in eventual repairs and/or replacement, as weil as claim payouts. TOTALAMOUMOFTRANSACTION$ � y ]� !�Q COST/REVENUEBUDGETED(CIHCLEONE) YES NO FUNDINGSOURCE 9�-�j A PIA 47 � 5�7 ACINITYNUMBER C97-2T729-0784-27012 FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (EXPLAIN) B R AST �.300 �.O�O C, Cts 97 = 5fl,0o0 ��-��s CITY QF 9T. PAUL COUN� FI E� �U PRELIMINARY ORDER gy "'�` _1^ File No._597048 �l� � Voting Ward_3 2n the Matter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following location(s): 597048 - South side of Hartford Ave from S Pascal St to Warwick St *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.45 per front foot for a five i5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide wa1k. A11 other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. The Council o£ the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 7 2 K3 That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1997 Public Improvement Aid. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 25th day of June, 1997, at 4:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice o£ said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSON5 Yeas Nays Blakey �s trom �rris �gard ;�Nf6rton �'Phune �/��.1\i � �In Favor � Against Adopted by Council: Date�.—� A JCZ ��{9'� 1 � Certified Passed by Council Secretary BY �� s � ��r `� �, � � Mayor SIIMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATION Ot �_��� Ward 3 PROJECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALH S.S. HAKfFORD AVE, from S. Pascal St. to Warwick St. ����� INITIATING ACTIOl�i: T'his order was initiated hy the Birector of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of a petition with one (1) signer and an inspeetion of the walk. EXISTING CUPIDITION5: This walk is poured concrete with heaves, scaled, spalled and settled panels. ...................................................................