97-815CITY OF ST. PAUL COUN ILE. NO. � � ��
FINAL ORDER By ��-
Fi1e No. 597048
Voting Ward 3
Ia the Matter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following location(s):
597048 - South sicle of Hart£ord Ave from S Pascal St to Warwick St
*E5TIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES
RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures)
Reconstructiou (replacement of o1d sidewalk) -$7_45 ger front foot for a five (5)
foot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide
walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction
{where no walk existed) - 1000 of the actual cost estimated to be
approximately $3.33 per square foot_
All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150
feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of
the property.
MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES
For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be
approximately 54.50 per square foot.
under Preliminary
The Council
above improvement
Charter; and
of the City of 5aint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the
, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City
WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations
pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now,
therefore, be it
RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the
above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed
and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it
FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City
officers shall calculate all e�enses incurred therein and shall report the same to
the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter.
COUNCILPERSONS
Yeas � Nays
+/B�l key
��ostrom
iil�rris
�gard
�rton
�jPrune
Ca\ � � y�S - t
Adopted by Council: Date�\���1�
Certified Passed by Council Secretary
�In Favor By � �� �...��o..�, Q �
...
�_Against �
� 1 � Mayor
_ ��S Q 1-� 1� �
'Public Aearing Dat - June 25, 1 997 RE 4-18-97 q1 -$'�S'
OEPARTMENi/OFFICE/COUNCIL DA7EINRUITED GREEN SHEET r,o. �22�s
Public Works Sidewalks 4-10-97 winnuoare MfT1AllDATE
CONTACTPEfiSONBPHONE DEPANTMENTDIRECTOR CfTYCAUNC1l
Robert A. Liss'�cfc - 2666121 ��N � cm arroarrer cm cLEp�c
AIUSTBEONCOUNC7LAGENDABY(DATE) 5_7_97 � g�JpGE7DIRECTOR FIN,SMGT.SFAVICESDIR.
Must be in Council ResearcIi Office MAVOR(ORASSISTANn � Coundl Ftesearch
by noon Frida 4-25-97 �
TOTAL Y OF SIGNATUAE PA6ES ]. _�CL1P ALL LOCAl10N5 FOR SIGNANHq � A3SOCIASE P NTAL ACCOLiNTANT
qC7loNREWES7ED - I - �Jj�
Reconstruct Sidewalk in Ward 3(See �tached Iist)
FECWIMENDA'floNS: Aawwe Wl orReiart fFl PEHSONAL SERVlCE CONTRACTS 1dUST ANSW£R 7NE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS:
_ PLANNING COMM1SS101V _��SERVICE COIAMlSS10N 1. Nas ihis pei Ne worked under a contr�t for U�is department?
Y
CIB CqAMIT�EE 2. Has fiis person/Frm ever been a ary employee?
— — YES NQ
A STAFF c _ 3. Does 7his persoMfirm possess a skill not normalty possessed by any current ciry
_DIS'rRiCTCOUNCII�`J _ employse? YES NO
SUPPORTS WHICH CWNGL OBJECTNE? ExP�ein eli yes eifSWafs on SepBrrMe SheBl a[M ettach to greetl shaet
7
INITIA ING PROBLEM. ISSUE. OPPOFTUNITY (WHO, WHAT, WHEN. WHERE. WH17:
The problem "defsctive sidewalk" was created because ot trea raots, deleterious subgrade material, afternating freefthaw cycles,
service 1'rfe limits, chemical addi[ives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide fevel and must be
addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewaik cond'Rion wouid worsen to a state where it would be
rendered unusable a�d subjed to increased pedestrian injuries from talis and possible litigations.
ADVANTAGES IF 0.PPROYEO:
The communfty will benefit from this project because it will provide safe detect free sidewalks for its many citizens. The sidewalk
coniraets are executad by private contrac[ors, so i[ folbws that private sector jobs are created as a result of this activity.
DISADVAN�AGES IF APPROVED:
Historicalfy, the sidewafk recnnstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment.
Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it still
remains controversiaL �� ;-,;;o=�E "�-��;, �;�r �{�.����°
��so.:.__,._. :_...a :�? �
� r. r
.'.: 'tr e. ^ �`��f
DISADVANTAGE$ IF NOT APPROVED: , ; �: ,.._ . ��- `
This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal injury suits,
uRimately resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in eventual repairs and/or replacement, as weil as claim payouts.
TOTALAMOUMOFTRANSACTION$ � y ]� !�Q COST/REVENUEBUDGETED(CIHCLEONE) YES NO
FUNDINGSOURCE 9�-�j A PIA 47 � 5�7 ACINITYNUMBER C97-2T729-0784-27012
FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (EXPLAIN) B R AST �.300 �.O�O
C, Cts 97 = 5fl,0o0
��-��s
CITY QF 9T. PAUL COUN� FI E� �U
PRELIMINARY ORDER gy "'�` _1^
File No._597048 �l�
� Voting Ward_3
2n the Matter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following location(s):
597048 - South side of Hartford Ave from S Pascal St to Warwick St
*ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES
RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures)
Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.45 per front foot for a
five i5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide
wa1k. A11 other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction
(where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be
approximately $3.33 per square foot.
All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150
feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of
the property.
MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES
For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be
approximately $4.50 per square foot.
The Council o£ the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon
the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves:
7
2
K3
That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives,
and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction
rates, financed by assessments and 1997 Public Improvement Aid.
That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 25th day of June, 1997,
at 4:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House
Building in the City of Saint Paul.
That notice o£ said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner
provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of
the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated.
COUNCILPERSON5
Yeas Nays
Blakey
�s trom
�rris
�gard
;�Nf6rton
�'Phune
�/��.1\i �
�In Favor
� Against
Adopted by Council: Date�.—� A JCZ ��{9'�
1 �
Certified Passed by Council Secretary
BY �� s � ��r `� �,
� �
Mayor
SIIMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATION Ot �_���
Ward 3
PROJECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALH S.S. HAKfFORD AVE, from S.
Pascal St. to Warwick St.
����� INITIATING ACTIOl�i: T'his order was initiated hy the Birector of Public
Works as public necessity on the basis of a petition with one (1) signer and an
inspeetion of the walk.
EXISTING CUPIDITION5: This walk is poured concrete with heaves, scaled,
spalled and settled panels.
...................................................................
CITY OF ST. PAUL COUN ILE. NO. � � ��
FINAL ORDER By ��-
Fi1e No. 597048
Voting Ward 3
Ia the Matter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following location(s):
597048 - South sicle of Hart£ord Ave from S Pascal St to Warwick St
*E5TIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES
RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures)
Reconstructiou (replacement of o1d sidewalk) -$7_45 ger front foot for a five (5)
foot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide
walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction
{where no walk existed) - 1000 of the actual cost estimated to be
approximately $3.33 per square foot_
All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150
feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of
the property.
MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES
For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be
approximately 54.50 per square foot.
under Preliminary
The Council
above improvement
Charter; and
of the City of 5aint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the
, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City
WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations
pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now,
therefore, be it
RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the
above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed
and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it
FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City
officers shall calculate all e�enses incurred therein and shall report the same to
the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter.
COUNCILPERSONS
Yeas � Nays
+/B�l key
��ostrom
iil�rris
�gard
�rton
�jPrune
Ca\ � � y�S - t
Adopted by Council: Date�\���1�
Certified Passed by Council Secretary
�In Favor By � �� �...��o..�, Q �
...
�_Against �
� 1 � Mayor
_ ��S Q 1-� 1� �
'Public Aearing Dat - June 25, 1 997 RE 4-18-97 q1 -$'�S'
OEPARTMENi/OFFICE/COUNCIL DA7EINRUITED GREEN SHEET r,o. �22�s
Public Works Sidewalks 4-10-97 winnuoare MfT1AllDATE
CONTACTPEfiSONBPHONE DEPANTMENTDIRECTOR CfTYCAUNC1l
Robert A. Liss'�cfc - 2666121 ��N � cm arroarrer cm cLEp�c
AIUSTBEONCOUNC7LAGENDABY(DATE) 5_7_97 � g�JpGE7DIRECTOR FIN,SMGT.SFAVICESDIR.
Must be in Council ResearcIi Office MAVOR(ORASSISTANn � Coundl Ftesearch
by noon Frida 4-25-97 �
TOTAL Y OF SIGNATUAE PA6ES ]. _�CL1P ALL LOCAl10N5 FOR SIGNANHq � A3SOCIASE P NTAL ACCOLiNTANT
qC7loNREWES7ED - I - �Jj�
Reconstruct Sidewalk in Ward 3(See �tached Iist)
FECWIMENDA'floNS: Aawwe Wl orReiart fFl PEHSONAL SERVlCE CONTRACTS 1dUST ANSW£R 7NE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS:
_ PLANNING COMM1SS101V _��SERVICE COIAMlSS10N 1. Nas ihis pei Ne worked under a contr�t for U�is department?
Y
CIB CqAMIT�EE 2. Has fiis person/Frm ever been a ary employee?
— — YES NQ
A STAFF c _ 3. Does 7his persoMfirm possess a skill not normalty possessed by any current ciry
_DIS'rRiCTCOUNCII�`J _ employse? YES NO
SUPPORTS WHICH CWNGL OBJECTNE? ExP�ein eli yes eifSWafs on SepBrrMe SheBl a[M ettach to greetl shaet
7
INITIA ING PROBLEM. ISSUE. OPPOFTUNITY (WHO, WHAT, WHEN. WHERE. WH17:
The problem "defsctive sidewalk" was created because ot trea raots, deleterious subgrade material, afternating freefthaw cycles,
service 1'rfe limits, chemical addi[ives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide fevel and must be
addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewaik cond'Rion wouid worsen to a state where it would be
rendered unusable a�d subjed to increased pedestrian injuries from talis and possible litigations.
ADVANTAGES IF 0.PPROYEO:
The communfty will benefit from this project because it will provide safe detect free sidewalks for its many citizens. The sidewalk
coniraets are executad by private contrac[ors, so i[ folbws that private sector jobs are created as a result of this activity.
DISADVAN�AGES IF APPROVED:
Historicalfy, the sidewafk recnnstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment.
Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it still
remains controversiaL �� ;-,;;o=�E "�-��;, �;�r �{�.����°
��so.:.__,._. :_...a :�? �
� r. r
.'.: 'tr e. ^ �`��f
DISADVANTAGE$ IF NOT APPROVED: , ; �: ,.._ . ��- `
This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal injury suits,
uRimately resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in eventual repairs and/or replacement, as weil as claim payouts.
TOTALAMOUMOFTRANSACTION$ � y ]� !�Q COST/REVENUEBUDGETED(CIHCLEONE) YES NO
FUNDINGSOURCE 9�-�j A PIA 47 � 5�7 ACINITYNUMBER C97-2T729-0784-27012
FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (EXPLAIN) B R AST �.300 �.O�O
C, Cts 97 = 5fl,0o0
��-��s
CITY QF 9T. PAUL COUN� FI E� �U
PRELIMINARY ORDER gy "'�` _1^
File No._597048 �l�
� Voting Ward_3
2n the Matter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following location(s):
597048 - South side of Hartford Ave from S Pascal St to Warwick St
*ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES
RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures)
Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.45 per front foot for a
five i5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide
wa1k. A11 other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction
(where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be
approximately $3.33 per square foot.
All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150
feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of
the property.
MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES
For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be
approximately $4.50 per square foot.
The Council o£ the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon
the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves:
7
2
K3
That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives,
and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction
rates, financed by assessments and 1997 Public Improvement Aid.
That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 25th day of June, 1997,
at 4:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House
Building in the City of Saint Paul.
That notice o£ said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner
provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of
the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated.
COUNCILPERSON5
Yeas Nays
Blakey
�s trom
�rris
�gard
;�Nf6rton
�'Phune
�/��.1\i �
�In Favor
� Against
Adopted by Council: Date�.—� A JCZ ��{9'�
1 �
Certified Passed by Council Secretary
BY �� s � ��r `� �,
� �
Mayor
SIIMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATION Ot �_���
Ward 3
PROJECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALH S.S. HAKfFORD AVE, from S.
Pascal St. to Warwick St.
����� INITIATING ACTIOl�i: T'his order was initiated hy the Birector of Public
Works as public necessity on the basis of a petition with one (1) signer and an
inspeetion of the walk.
EXISTING CUPIDITION5: This walk is poured concrete with heaves, scaled,
spalled and settled panels.
...................................................................
CITY OF ST. PAUL COUN ILE. NO. � � ��
FINAL ORDER By ��-
Fi1e No. 597048
Voting Ward 3
Ia the Matter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following location(s):
597048 - South sicle of Hart£ord Ave from S Pascal St to Warwick St
*E5TIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES
RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures)
Reconstructiou (replacement of o1d sidewalk) -$7_45 ger front foot for a five (5)
foot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide
walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction
{where no walk existed) - 1000 of the actual cost estimated to be
approximately $3.33 per square foot_
All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150
feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of
the property.
MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES
For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be
approximately 54.50 per square foot.
under Preliminary
The Council
above improvement
Charter; and
of the City of 5aint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the
, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City
WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations
pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now,
therefore, be it
RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the
above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed
and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it
FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City
officers shall calculate all e�enses incurred therein and shall report the same to
the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter.
COUNCILPERSONS
Yeas � Nays
+/B�l key
��ostrom
iil�rris
�gard
�rton
�jPrune
Ca\ � � y�S - t
Adopted by Council: Date�\���1�
Certified Passed by Council Secretary
�In Favor By � �� �...��o..�, Q �
...
�_Against �
� 1 � Mayor
_ ��S Q 1-� 1� �
'Public Aearing Dat - June 25, 1 997 RE 4-18-97 q1 -$'�S'
OEPARTMENi/OFFICE/COUNCIL DA7EINRUITED GREEN SHEET r,o. �22�s
Public Works Sidewalks 4-10-97 winnuoare MfT1AllDATE
CONTACTPEfiSONBPHONE DEPANTMENTDIRECTOR CfTYCAUNC1l
Robert A. Liss'�cfc - 2666121 ��N � cm arroarrer cm cLEp�c
AIUSTBEONCOUNC7LAGENDABY(DATE) 5_7_97 � g�JpGE7DIRECTOR FIN,SMGT.SFAVICESDIR.
Must be in Council ResearcIi Office MAVOR(ORASSISTANn � Coundl Ftesearch
by noon Frida 4-25-97 �
TOTAL Y OF SIGNATUAE PA6ES ]. _�CL1P ALL LOCAl10N5 FOR SIGNANHq � A3SOCIASE P NTAL ACCOLiNTANT
qC7loNREWES7ED - I - �Jj�
Reconstruct Sidewalk in Ward 3(See �tached Iist)
FECWIMENDA'floNS: Aawwe Wl orReiart fFl PEHSONAL SERVlCE CONTRACTS 1dUST ANSW£R 7NE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS:
_ PLANNING COMM1SS101V _��SERVICE COIAMlSS10N 1. Nas ihis pei Ne worked under a contr�t for U�is department?
Y
CIB CqAMIT�EE 2. Has fiis person/Frm ever been a ary employee?
— — YES NQ
A STAFF c _ 3. Does 7his persoMfirm possess a skill not normalty possessed by any current ciry
_DIS'rRiCTCOUNCII�`J _ employse? YES NO
SUPPORTS WHICH CWNGL OBJECTNE? ExP�ein eli yes eifSWafs on SepBrrMe SheBl a[M ettach to greetl shaet
7
INITIA ING PROBLEM. ISSUE. OPPOFTUNITY (WHO, WHAT, WHEN. WHERE. WH17:
The problem "defsctive sidewalk" was created because ot trea raots, deleterious subgrade material, afternating freefthaw cycles,
service 1'rfe limits, chemical addi[ives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide fevel and must be
addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewaik cond'Rion wouid worsen to a state where it would be
rendered unusable a�d subjed to increased pedestrian injuries from talis and possible litigations.
ADVANTAGES IF 0.PPROYEO:
The communfty will benefit from this project because it will provide safe detect free sidewalks for its many citizens. The sidewalk
coniraets are executad by private contrac[ors, so i[ folbws that private sector jobs are created as a result of this activity.
DISADVAN�AGES IF APPROVED:
Historicalfy, the sidewafk recnnstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment.
Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it still
remains controversiaL �� ;-,;;o=�E "�-��;, �;�r �{�.����°
��so.:.__,._. :_...a :�? �
� r. r
.'.: 'tr e. ^ �`��f
DISADVANTAGE$ IF NOT APPROVED: , ; �: ,.._ . ��- `
This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal injury suits,
uRimately resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in eventual repairs and/or replacement, as weil as claim payouts.
TOTALAMOUMOFTRANSACTION$ � y ]� !�Q COST/REVENUEBUDGETED(CIHCLEONE) YES NO
FUNDINGSOURCE 9�-�j A PIA 47 � 5�7 ACINITYNUMBER C97-2T729-0784-27012
FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (EXPLAIN) B R AST �.300 �.O�O
C, Cts 97 = 5fl,0o0
��-��s
CITY QF 9T. PAUL COUN� FI E� �U
PRELIMINARY ORDER gy "'�` _1^
File No._597048 �l�
� Voting Ward_3
2n the Matter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following location(s):
597048 - South side of Hartford Ave from S Pascal St to Warwick St
*ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES
RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures)
Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.45 per front foot for a
five i5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide
wa1k. A11 other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction
(where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be
approximately $3.33 per square foot.
All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150
feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of
the property.
MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES
For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be
approximately $4.50 per square foot.
The Council o£ the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon
the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves:
7
2
K3
That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives,
and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction
rates, financed by assessments and 1997 Public Improvement Aid.
That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 25th day of June, 1997,
at 4:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House
Building in the City of Saint Paul.
That notice o£ said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner
provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of
the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated.
COUNCILPERSON5
Yeas Nays
Blakey
�s trom
�rris
�gard
;�Nf6rton
�'Phune
�/��.1\i �
�In Favor
� Against
Adopted by Council: Date�.—� A JCZ ��{9'�
1 �
Certified Passed by Council Secretary
BY �� s � ��r `� �,
� �
Mayor
SIIMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATION Ot �_���
Ward 3
PROJECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALH S.S. HAKfFORD AVE, from S.
Pascal St. to Warwick St.
����� INITIATING ACTIOl�i: T'his order was initiated hy the Birector of Public
Works as public necessity on the basis of a petition with one (1) signer and an
inspeetion of the walk.
EXISTING CUPIDITION5: This walk is poured concrete with heaves, scaled,
spalled and settled panels.
...................................................................