The URL can be used to link to this page

97-813T � ' � CITY OF ST. PAUL FINAL ORDER COUNCIL FILE NO_ By File . 5970 1 In the Matter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following location(s): 597041 - South side of Englewood Ave from N Lexington Pkwy to N Dunlap St 597042 - Both sides of Van &uren Ave from Virginia St to Como Ave *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES � RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Raconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.45 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per front £oot £or a six (6) £oot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New constructioa (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot_ under Preliminary order _ l - _4 � The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council o£ the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays ✓Blakey �BOStrom ✓arris �egard ✓� rton t/Thune v � C �`. r�5 _ ty �3 e r3 i� Adopted by Council: Date�`°(,�f� � Certified Pas5ed by Council Secretary � In Favor By �-� �_. !-�.�_,� � Against 7`� J (� Mayor � t�'c�52a'J'�"� � Public Heaxin Date — Sune 25 1997 RE 4-18-97 �(1 —��'� OEPApTMENTlOFFICFICOUNCIL DATEINRIATED GREEN SHEET No. Public Works Sidawalks 410-9� INITIAUDATE NlITIAUDATE CONTACTPERSON&PHONE �DEPPRTiiENTDIfiECTQR �CIiYCOUNCIL Robert A. Lissick - 26&6121 �� crtr arrorwEV ❑ ar u Ewc MUSTBEONCOUNCILAGENDABY(DATE) 5—�— � ��' �BUDGETDIRECTOR FIN.&MGT.SERVICESDIR. Must be in Council Research Office � MAYOF(OflASSISTMfi) t[ Gounal Research b noon Frida 4-25-97 � T0T1LL e OF SIGNANRE PAGES 1 _(CLIP ALL LOCA710N3 FOB 91GN11Nii� � ASSOCaTE EPfTAI ACCOUP�TMT ACTpl,R�«,EShO ��- g j Raconstruct Sidewalk i� Ward t(See attached list) �� - HZ- REWMMENDATIONS: Appmw (!y or Rejacl(R) pE,pgpryp� �qy�� {ppC7S MUST ANSWEFi THE WLLOWING QUESTIONS: PLANNING CoMMISSION _CIVIL SEPVICE WMMISSION 1 . � m� E��°^�fi NO� worked under a cmhaa for this departrnent? _CIB COA1MfTTEE _ 2. H25 this person/fi Ne been a ciry emPloyee? YE A sTAFF 9. Does this person/firm possess a skill not normaly possessed by any curcent ciry — employee? p�snyic7cautacw—{� _ YES NO SUPPORTS YINIGH CAUNGIL oBJEGTIVE? �ein all ye8 aneWels on sepBfete sheet arM atfaeh to g�a@pi�� L INRWT PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPORNNIIY (WHO, WHAT, WHEN, WHERE, WHY): The problem "defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, de{eterious subgrade material, � �9 cles, sesvice tite limi[s, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a�d i8e ��ust be addressed and corrected on an annual basis. left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations. ADVANTAGES IF APPROVEO: The communi[y will benefit Srom this project because it will provide safe detect free sidewalks for its many citizens. The sidewalk contracts are executed by private contraciors, sa R follows that private sector jobs are created as a resuR of this activity. DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED: Histarically, the sidewalk reconsVUCtions have created negative feedback in the area of cronstruction procedure and assessment. Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fad up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it still remains controversiaL N �� , Y ye �y.pq�.iz'J.'�.G` 4i.Ja�rS� VY83�.'.Yi.rLy. , �.Y...., "� 'P $1 : �CrA s`' �5A .9. :� i::iJ DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVEp: ` ?:�� -� This option would aliow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate mSre"'personal injury suits, uftimately resulting in the expenditure of farger dollar amounts in eventual repairs and/or replacement, as well as claim payouts. TOTALAMWMOFTRANSACTIONS 9 qREtt COST/REVENUEBUDGETED(CIRCLEONE) YES olo FUNDINGSOURCE ��^ R, P�fi 97 = 5J pCINITYNUMBER C97�ZT72g-o784 FINANCIALINFOflMATION:(EXPUIIN) a,. asT = 3oo,00a c, Cta 97 = 50,000 CITY OF ST. PAVL ORDfiR % In Favor In the Matter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following location(s�: 597041 - South side of Englewood Ave from N Lexington Pkwy to N Dunlap St 597042 - Both sides of Van Buren Ave from Virginia St to Como Ave *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family 5tructures) Reconetruction (replacement of old sidewalk� -$7.45 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per Eront foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along.and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(MOre than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1 2 3 That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1997 Public Improvement Aid. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 25th day of June, 1997, at 4:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City o£ Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost therepf as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays ✓Blakey t�ostrom �/f�arris ✓�Iegard i/i�orton ;/�hune '' a\\.nS � Against at'1- �' 13 COUNCIL FSLE NO. -' � By �� Fil No._ 0 1 k 7042 Vo ing a d�1 Adopted by Council: Date t-� � �O �� 1� Certified Passed by Council Secretary BY � �. �,��.� Mayor � U � � � � 1 � ,� � C�� - i��'� �� P - �— � — `P'Y - ^ �- �,,� � ��, �.�� , � � � �� . _ �� G'��-�-� �-�-� �� -� �� _ �'� �2:� � �� `-� ` � �� -�- �'� � -�-� f � � �/l� � � r� � ��e� �� - � �� G�r�� J ��h�-�eJ� . ,�-��J� �.� � a-�-�--�� i��-�� C��-Cv`� �� f � i' 6 '�-��i `� �t� / ;� � i '��-�f/�� c � -�� ,� � °-�-z�� -l� C�� C�� .%� °.��' `�� -� ��-��- � � � �%�-�� f� �1��. � ,�,�,�, � �-�� ---.�, ,�� .�� .,�� .� ��. ir� �' � ��, C��` d /yl/� ...�J� �i << �i i 'f � � � /'—��'� F �� ., �� `--�,�cl�"�—`�.�—�1,G�CJ �ir� ,� !�1 �t/ ' � `,/�, �%� '�'�� 1�/ L��%��I�GP�� i�yv2��yr1� � �� , ��-�� SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATIONS o��_ �I� Ward 1 PRO�rn'-�"r• RFCONSTRUCT SIDEWALS S.S. ENGLEWOOD AVE. from N. Lexington Pkwy. to N. Dunlap St. St. 7 1 l�� IIvITIATING ACTIOI�i: 'I71is order was inil3ated by the Director of Public Works as pubIic necessity on the basis of nine (9) complaints and an inspection of the walk. E%ISTING CUPTDITIONS: 'i`his walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphait patches, settled and cracked panels. ................................................................... PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. VAN BUREN AVE. from Virginia St. to Como Ave. �(��`� II�iITIATING ACTIO�t: This order was initiated by the I7irector of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of two (2) complaints, a petition with one (1) signer and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, settled and cracked panels. ................................................................... T � ' � CITY OF ST. PAUL FINAL ORDER COUNCIL FILE NO_ By File . 5970 1 In the Matter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following location(s): 597041 - South side of Englewood Ave from N Lexington Pkwy to N Dunlap St 597042 - Both sides of Van &uren Ave from Virginia St to Como Ave *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES � RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Raconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.45 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per front £oot £or a six (6) £oot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New constructioa (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot_ under Preliminary order _ l - _4 � The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council o£ the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays ✓Blakey �BOStrom ✓arris �egard ✓� rton t/Thune v � C �`. r�5 _ ty �3 e r3 i� Adopted by Council: Date�`°(,�f� � Certified Pas5ed by Council Secretary � In Favor By �-� �_. !-�.�_,� � Against 7`� J (� Mayor � t�'c�52a'J'�"� � Public Heaxin Date — Sune 25 1997 RE 4-18-97 �(1 —��'� OEPApTMENTlOFFICFICOUNCIL DATEINRIATED GREEN SHEET No. Public Works Sidawalks 410-9� INITIAUDATE NlITIAUDATE CONTACTPERSON&PHONE �DEPPRTiiENTDIfiECTQR �CIiYCOUNCIL Robert A. Lissick - 26&6121 �� crtr arrorwEV ❑ ar u Ewc MUSTBEONCOUNCILAGENDABY(DATE) 5—�— � ��' �BUDGETDIRECTOR FIN.&MGT.SERVICESDIR. Must be in Council Research Office � MAYOF(OflASSISTMfi) t[ Gounal Research b noon Frida 4-25-97 � T0T1LL e OF SIGNANRE PAGES 1 _(CLIP ALL LOCA710N3 FOB 91GN11Nii� � ASSOCaTE EPfTAI ACCOUP�TMT ACTpl,R�«,EShO ��- g j Raconstruct Sidewalk i� Ward t(See attached list) �� - HZ- REWMMENDATIONS: Appmw (!y or Rejacl(R) pE,pgpryp� �qy�� {ppC7S MUST ANSWEFi THE WLLOWING QUESTIONS: PLANNING CoMMISSION _CIVIL SEPVICE WMMISSION 1 . � m� E��°^�fi NO� worked under a cmhaa for this departrnent? _CIB COA1MfTTEE _ 2. H25 this person/fi Ne been a ciry emPloyee? YE A sTAFF 9. Does this person/firm possess a skill not normaly possessed by any curcent ciry — employee? p�snyic7cautacw—{� _ YES NO SUPPORTS YINIGH CAUNGIL oBJEGTIVE? �ein all ye8 aneWels on sepBfete sheet arM atfaeh to g�a@pi�� L INRWT PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPORNNIIY (WHO, WHAT, WHEN, WHERE, WHY): The problem "defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, de{eterious subgrade material, � �9 cles, sesvice tite limi[s, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a�d i8e ��ust be addressed and corrected on an annual basis. left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations. ADVANTAGES IF APPROVEO: The communi[y will benefit Srom this project because it will provide safe detect free sidewalks for its many citizens. The sidewalk contracts are executed by private contraciors, sa R follows that private sector jobs are created as a resuR of this activity. DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED: Histarically, the sidewalk reconsVUCtions have created negative feedback in the area of cronstruction procedure and assessment. Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fad up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it still remains controversiaL N �� , Y ye �y.pq�.iz'J.'�.G` 4i.Ja�rS� VY83�.'.Yi.rLy. , �.Y...., "� 'P $1 : �CrA s`' �5A .9. :� i::iJ DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVEp: ` ?:�� -� This option would aliow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate mSre"'personal injury suits, uftimately resulting in the expenditure of farger dollar amounts in eventual repairs and/or replacement, as well as claim payouts. TOTALAMWMOFTRANSACTIONS 9 qREtt COST/REVENUEBUDGETED(CIRCLEONE) YES olo FUNDINGSOURCE ��^ R, P�fi 97 = 5J pCINITYNUMBER C97�ZT72g-o784 FINANCIALINFOflMATION:(EXPUIIN) a,. asT = 3oo,00a c, Cta 97 = 50,000 CITY OF ST. PAVL ORDfiR % In Favor In the Matter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following location(s�: 597041 - South side of Englewood Ave from N Lexington Pkwy to N Dunlap St 597042 - Both sides of Van Buren Ave from Virginia St to Como Ave *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family 5tructures) Reconetruction (replacement of old sidewalk� -$7.45 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per Eront foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along.and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(MOre than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1 2 3 That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1997 Public Improvement Aid. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 25th day of June, 1997, at 4:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City o£ Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost therepf as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays ✓Blakey t�ostrom �/f�arris ✓�Iegard i/i�orton ;/�hune '' a\\.nS � Against at'1- �' 13 COUNCIL FSLE NO. -' � By �� Fil No._ 0 1 k 7042 Vo ing a d�1 Adopted by Council: Date t-� � �O �� 1� Certified Passed by Council Secretary BY � �. �,��.� Mayor � U � � � � 1 � ,� � C�� - i��'� �� P - �— � — `P'Y - ^ �- �,,� � ��, �.�� , � � � �� . _ �� G'��-�-� �-�-� �� -� �� _ �'� �2:� � �� `-� ` � �� -�- �'� � -�-� f � � �/l� � � r� � ��e� �� - � �� G�r�� J ��h�-�eJ� . ,�-��J� �.� � a-�-�--�� i��-�� C��-Cv`� �� f � i' 6 '�-��i `� �t� / ;� � i '��-�f/�� c � -�� ,� � °-�-z�� -l� C�� C�� .%� °.��' `�� -� ��-��- � � � �%�-�� f� �1��. � ,�,�,�, � �-�� ---.�, ,�� .�� .,�� .� ��. ir� �' � ��, C��` d /yl/� ...�J� �i << �i i 'f � � � /'—��'� F �� ., �� `--�,�cl�"�—`�.�—�1,G�CJ �ir� ,� !�1 �t/ ' � `,/�, �%� '�'�� 1�/ L��%��I�GP�� i�yv2��yr1� � �� , ��-�� SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATIONS o��_ �I� Ward 1 PRO�rn'-�"r• RFCONSTRUCT SIDEWALS S.S. ENGLEWOOD AVE. from N. Lexington Pkwy. to N. Dunlap St. St. 7 1 l�� IIvITIATING ACTIOI�i: 'I71is order was inil3ated by the Director of Public Works as pubIic necessity on the basis of nine (9) complaints and an inspection of the walk. E%ISTING CUPTDITIONS: 'i`his walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphait patches, settled and cracked panels. ................................................................... PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. VAN BUREN AVE. from Virginia St. to Como Ave. �(��`� II�iITIATING ACTIO�t: This order was initiated by the I7irector of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of two (2) complaints, a petition with one (1) signer and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, settled and cracked panels. ................................................................... T � ' � CITY OF ST. PAUL FINAL ORDER COUNCIL FILE NO_ By File . 5970 1 In the Matter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following location(s): 597041 - South side of Englewood Ave from N Lexington Pkwy to N Dunlap St 597042 - Both sides of Van &uren Ave from Virginia St to Como Ave *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES � RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Raconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.45 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per front £oot £or a six (6) £oot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New constructioa (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot_ under Preliminary order _ l - _4 � The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council o£ the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays ✓Blakey �BOStrom ✓arris �egard ✓� rton t/Thune v � C �`. r�5 _ ty �3 e r3 i� Adopted by Council: Date�`°(,�f� � Certified Pas5ed by Council Secretary � In Favor By �-� �_. !-�.�_,� � Against 7`� J (� Mayor � t�'c�52a'J'�"� � Public Heaxin Date — Sune 25 1997 RE 4-18-97 �(1 —��'� OEPApTMENTlOFFICFICOUNCIL DATEINRIATED GREEN SHEET No. Public Works Sidawalks 410-9� INITIAUDATE NlITIAUDATE CONTACTPERSON&PHONE �DEPPRTiiENTDIfiECTQR �CIiYCOUNCIL Robert A. Lissick - 26&6121 �� crtr arrorwEV ❑ ar u Ewc MUSTBEONCOUNCILAGENDABY(DATE) 5—�— � ��' �BUDGETDIRECTOR FIN.&MGT.SERVICESDIR. Must be in Council Research Office � MAYOF(OflASSISTMfi) t[ Gounal Research b noon Frida 4-25-97 � T0T1LL e OF SIGNANRE PAGES 1 _(CLIP ALL LOCA710N3 FOB 91GN11Nii� � ASSOCaTE EPfTAI ACCOUP�TMT ACTpl,R�«,EShO ��- g j Raconstruct Sidewalk i� Ward t(See attached list) �� - HZ- REWMMENDATIONS: Appmw (!y or Rejacl(R) pE,pgpryp� �qy�� {ppC7S MUST ANSWEFi THE WLLOWING QUESTIONS: PLANNING CoMMISSION _CIVIL SEPVICE WMMISSION 1 . � m� E��°^�fi NO� worked under a cmhaa for this departrnent? _CIB COA1MfTTEE _ 2. H25 this person/fi Ne been a ciry emPloyee? YE A sTAFF 9. Does this person/firm possess a skill not normaly possessed by any curcent ciry — employee? p�snyic7cautacw—{� _ YES NO SUPPORTS YINIGH CAUNGIL oBJEGTIVE? �ein all ye8 aneWels on sepBfete sheet arM atfaeh to g�a@pi�� L INRWT PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPORNNIIY (WHO, WHAT, WHEN, WHERE, WHY): The problem "defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, de{eterious subgrade material, � �9 cles, sesvice tite limi[s, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a�d i8e ��ust be addressed and corrected on an annual basis. left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations. ADVANTAGES IF APPROVEO: The communi[y will benefit Srom this project because it will provide safe detect free sidewalks for its many citizens. The sidewalk contracts are executed by private contraciors, sa R follows that private sector jobs are created as a resuR of this activity. DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED: Histarically, the sidewalk reconsVUCtions have created negative feedback in the area of cronstruction procedure and assessment. Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fad up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it still remains controversiaL N �� , Y ye �y.pq�.iz'J.'�.G` 4i.Ja�rS� VY83�.'.Yi.rLy. , �.Y...., "� 'P $1 : �CrA s`' �5A .9. :� i::iJ DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVEp: ` ?:�� -� This option would aliow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate mSre"'personal injury suits, uftimately resulting in the expenditure of farger dollar amounts in eventual repairs and/or replacement, as well as claim payouts. TOTALAMWMOFTRANSACTIONS 9 qREtt COST/REVENUEBUDGETED(CIRCLEONE) YES olo FUNDINGSOURCE ��^ R, P�fi 97 = 5J pCINITYNUMBER C97�ZT72g-o784 FINANCIALINFOflMATION:(EXPUIIN) a,. asT = 3oo,00a c, Cta 97 = 50,000 CITY OF ST. PAVL ORDfiR % In Favor In the Matter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following location(s�: 597041 - South side of Englewood Ave from N Lexington Pkwy to N Dunlap St 597042 - Both sides of Van Buren Ave from Virginia St to Como Ave *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family 5tructures) Reconetruction (replacement of old sidewalk� -$7.45 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per Eront foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along.and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(MOre than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1 2 3 That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1997 Public Improvement Aid. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 25th day of June, 1997, at 4:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City o£ Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost therepf as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays ✓Blakey t�ostrom �/f�arris ✓�Iegard i/i�orton ;/�hune '' a\\.nS � Against at'1- �' 13 COUNCIL FSLE NO. -' � By �� Fil No._ 0 1 k 7042 Vo ing a d�1 Adopted by Council: Date t-� � �O �� 1� Certified Passed by Council Secretary BY � �. �,��.� Mayor � U � � � � 1 � ,� � C�� - i��'� �� P - �— � — `P'Y - ^ �- �,,� � ��, �.�� , � � � �� . _ �� G'��-�-� �-�-� �� -� �� _ �'� �2:� � �� `-� ` � �� -�- �'� � -�-� f � � �/l� � � r� � ��e� �� - � �� G�r�� J ��h�-�eJ� . ,�-��J� �.� � a-�-�--�� i��-�� C��-Cv`� �� f � i' 6 '�-��i `� �t� / ;� � i '��-�f/�� c � -�� ,� � °-�-z�� -l� C�� C�� .%� °.��' `�� -� ��-��- � � � �%�-�� f� �1��. � ,�,�,�, � �-�� ---.�, ,�� .�� .,�� .� ��. ir� �' � ��, C��` d /yl/� ...�J� �i << �i i 'f � � � /'—��'� F �� ., �� `--�,�cl�"�—`�.�—�1,G�CJ �ir� ,� !�1 �t/ ' � `,/�, �%� '�'�� 1�/ L��%��I�GP�� i�yv2��yr1� � �� , ��-�� SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATIONS o��_ �I� Ward 1 PRO�rn'-�"r• RFCONSTRUCT SIDEWALS S.S. ENGLEWOOD AVE. from N. Lexington Pkwy. to N. Dunlap St. St. 7 1 l�� IIvITIATING ACTIOI�i: 'I71is order was inil3ated by the Director of Public Works as pubIic necessity on the basis of nine (9) complaints and an inspection of the walk. E%ISTING CUPTDITIONS: 'i`his walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphait patches, settled and cracked panels. ................................................................... PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. VAN BUREN AVE. from Virginia St. to Como Ave. �(��`� II�iITIATING ACTIO�t: This order was initiated by the I7irector of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of two (2) complaints, a petition with one (1) signer and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, settled and cracked panels. ...................................................................