97-812CITY OS ST. PAIIL COUNC�IL / F / �I LE NO_ �� ����
FINAL ORDER By �/ (/lfi�'(� ,.
File No_ 597040
Voting Ward 3
In the Matter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following location(s):
597040 - East side of 5 Griggs St from Bayard Ave to Scheffer Ave.
*ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES
��
•
RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures)
Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.45 per front foot for a five (5)
foot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide
walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction
(where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be
approximately $3.33 per square foot.
All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150
feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of
the property.
MLSLTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three £amily structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES
For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be
approximately $4.50 per square foot.
under Preliminary
The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the
above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City
Charter; and
WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations
pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now,
therefore, be it
RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the
above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed
and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it
FiIRTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City
officers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to
the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter.
COUNCILPERSONS
Yeas Nays
✓1 akey
i�ostrom
�rris /�
�Pfegard la In Favor
�orton
h� �fl,`na- �L.sc.sT � Against
une �
t �
Adopted by Council: Date 7
U
Certified Passed by Council Secretary
By�c-�_ ^i � 1 �-/�w�c✓�.ri—_„�
�. �
Mayor
-Public Hearing Date — June 25, 1997 RE 4-18-97 q� ����
DEPARTMENT/OFFICE/COUNCIL DATE INITIAiED 0
PublicWorksSidewalks 3_pg.g7 GREEN SHE No.� �1
INITIAUDATE INRIAVDATE
CONTACTPEFSON&PHONE �pEppq7).fEMDIpECTOR CITYCOUNCIL
Robert A. Lissick - 266-6121 �N cm nnorwer CITV CLEFK
IAUSTBEONCOUNCII.AC£NDAeY(DATE) ) r_7_(� 7 N pOV�ll e� � g�pGE7DIflECTOR �FIN.&MGT.SERVICESDIR.
Must be in Council Research Office � MAVOP(ORASSi5TAt3n 0 Coundf Re e�arch
b noon Frida 4-25-97
TOTAL t OF SIGNANpE PAGES 1 __ (GLIP ALL LOCA71ONS FOR 9GWITUR� � ASSOCIA7E DEPAR7TAENTAL ACWUMANT
ACTIONIiEWES1ED �� �
Reconstruct Sidewalk in Ward 3(See adtached list)
� i
RECbMMENDATroNS: Apprae (ly or Rejea (i� pEpgpNp� SERVICE COMHACTS MUST ANSWEF THE FOLLON7NG QUESTIONS:
PLANNING COMMISSIIXJ _CNIL SERVICE COMMISSION �� � m � s E�S Nfi NO f wofked Undef a COn[ract fOr ihls department?
CIe CoMMmEE 2. Has ihispersoNFirm ever been a dry amploYee?
— — YES NO
A STAFF 3. Dces this person�irm possess a swll not normalry possessed by arry current ciry
— 5 — �
DISTRICTCOUNCIL�' l _ YES NO
SUPPORTS N7iICH GOUNGL OBJECTNE? �D�am alf yas anawar5 on seperaie sheet and attach to gfwn sh0et
��"-�e�/
INRIATING PROBLEM. ISSUE.OPPORTUNI7Y (WHO. WriA7. WHEN, WHERE. WFiV):
The problem "defective sidewafk" was creffied because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade materiai, aRernating freeRhaw cycles,
service I'rfe IimRs, chemical additives, extreme tempereture variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide {eve! and must be
addressed and correeted on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk cond"Rion would worsen to a state where it would be
rendered unusable and subjed to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible Iftigations.
ADVANTAGES IF APPROVED:
The community will benefk from this project because it will provide safe detect free sidewalks for its many citizens. The sidewalk
contracts are executad by private contractors, so ft follows that private sector jobs are created as a result of this activity.
��,�.�
�.�._,_.__. , ._ �_ _._ ._ .... a"
.., .> 3. 4,J Ea7�Y
DISADVANTAGESIFAPPROVED: .__ ,::�=
Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment.
Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-ha�f the assessment is City subsidized, it still
remains coniroversial.
DISAOVANTAGES IF NOT APPpOVED:
This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal injury suits,
uftimately resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in eventual repairs and/or replacement, as well as claim payouts.
TOTALAMWNTOFTRANSACTIONS �:Q37.g� COSS/pEYENUE6UDGETED(CIRCLEONE) YES ao
FUNDINGSWHCE 97' R PlA 97 = 557 >4�fl pCRVRYNUMBEH cg7-2'r7z9-o�8a-27asz
FttJANCfAL iNFOHMATION: (EXPLAIN) B t , AST ^ 3OO �O�O
C, Ctg g7 = 50,OQ0
°t� - �t �
CITY OF ST. PAUL
PRELIMINARY ORDER
f In Favor
In tha Matter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following location(s):
597040 - East side of S Griggs St from Bayard Ave to Scheffer Ave.
*ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATE5
RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures)
Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.45 per front foot for a
five (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide
walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. DIaw construction
(where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be
approximately $3.33 per square foot.
All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150
feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of
the property.
MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES
For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1�0� of actual cost estimated to be
approximately $4.50 per square foot.
The Council of the City of Saint Pau1 having received the report of the Mayor upon
the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves:
7
2
3
That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives,
and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction
rates, financed by assessments and 1997 Public Improvement Aid.
That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 25th day of June, 1997,
at 4:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Ha11 and Court House
Building in the City of Saint Paul.
That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner
provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of
the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated,
COUNCILPERSONS
Yeas Nays
��lakey
�ostrom
+/�arris
iiPfegard
�rton n
v ��--z� ��� �✓LS
r�PYtune
yLAgains t
COUN FIL NO — �
B ���� %�—
File No. 597040
Voting Ward 3 �/_
W
Adopted by Council: Datel'�liti,_ I.SCI ly�`7
�� ,
Certified Passed by Council Secretary
BY ��` ._�c-}�—�/Y'�` _^,�.
Mayor
SUNIMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATION
�� ���d�►.
Ward 3
����
PROJECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALg E.S. S. GRIGGS ST. from Bayard
Ave. to Scheffer Ave.
INITIATIIITG ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public
Works as public necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint, a petition with
one (1) signer and an inspection of the walk.
EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves,
asphalt patches and disintegrated panels.
...................................................................
CITY OS ST. PAIIL COUNC�IL / F / �I LE NO_ �� ����
FINAL ORDER By �/ (/lfi�'(� ,.
File No_ 597040
Voting Ward 3
In the Matter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following location(s):
597040 - East side of 5 Griggs St from Bayard Ave to Scheffer Ave.
*ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES
��
•
RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures)
Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.45 per front foot for a five (5)
foot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide
walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction
(where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be
approximately $3.33 per square foot.
All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150
feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of
the property.
MLSLTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three £amily structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES
For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be
approximately $4.50 per square foot.
under Preliminary
The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the
above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City
Charter; and
WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations
pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now,
therefore, be it
RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the
above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed
and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it
FiIRTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City
officers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to
the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter.
COUNCILPERSONS
Yeas Nays
✓1 akey
i�ostrom
�rris /�
�Pfegard la In Favor
�orton
h� �fl,`na- �L.sc.sT � Against
une �
t �
Adopted by Council: Date 7
U
Certified Passed by Council Secretary
By�c-�_ ^i � 1 �-/�w�c✓�.ri—_„�
�. �
Mayor
-Public Hearing Date — June 25, 1997 RE 4-18-97 q� ����
DEPARTMENT/OFFICE/COUNCIL DATE INITIAiED 0
PublicWorksSidewalks 3_pg.g7 GREEN SHE No.� �1
INITIAUDATE INRIAVDATE
CONTACTPEFSON&PHONE �pEppq7).fEMDIpECTOR CITYCOUNCIL
Robert A. Lissick - 266-6121 �N cm nnorwer CITV CLEFK
IAUSTBEONCOUNCII.AC£NDAeY(DATE) ) r_7_(� 7 N pOV�ll e� � g�pGE7DIflECTOR �FIN.&MGT.SERVICESDIR.
Must be in Council Research Office � MAVOP(ORASSi5TAt3n 0 Coundf Re e�arch
b noon Frida 4-25-97
TOTAL t OF SIGNANpE PAGES 1 __ (GLIP ALL LOCA71ONS FOR 9GWITUR� � ASSOCIA7E DEPAR7TAENTAL ACWUMANT
ACTIONIiEWES1ED �� �
Reconstruct Sidewalk in Ward 3(See adtached list)
� i
RECbMMENDATroNS: Apprae (ly or Rejea (i� pEpgpNp� SERVICE COMHACTS MUST ANSWEF THE FOLLON7NG QUESTIONS:
PLANNING COMMISSIIXJ _CNIL SERVICE COMMISSION �� � m � s E�S Nfi NO f wofked Undef a COn[ract fOr ihls department?
CIe CoMMmEE 2. Has ihispersoNFirm ever been a dry amploYee?
— — YES NO
A STAFF 3. Dces this person�irm possess a swll not normalry possessed by arry current ciry
— 5 — �
DISTRICTCOUNCIL�' l _ YES NO
SUPPORTS N7iICH GOUNGL OBJECTNE? �D�am alf yas anawar5 on seperaie sheet and attach to gfwn sh0et
��"-�e�/
INRIATING PROBLEM. ISSUE.OPPORTUNI7Y (WHO. WriA7. WHEN, WHERE. WFiV):
The problem "defective sidewafk" was creffied because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade materiai, aRernating freeRhaw cycles,
service I'rfe IimRs, chemical additives, extreme tempereture variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide {eve! and must be
addressed and correeted on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk cond"Rion would worsen to a state where it would be
rendered unusable and subjed to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible Iftigations.
ADVANTAGES IF APPROVED:
The community will benefk from this project because it will provide safe detect free sidewalks for its many citizens. The sidewalk
contracts are executad by private contractors, so ft follows that private sector jobs are created as a result of this activity.
��,�.�
�.�._,_.__. , ._ �_ _._ ._ .... a"
.., .> 3. 4,J Ea7�Y
DISADVANTAGESIFAPPROVED: .__ ,::�=
Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment.
Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-ha�f the assessment is City subsidized, it still
remains coniroversial.
DISAOVANTAGES IF NOT APPpOVED:
This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal injury suits,
uftimately resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in eventual repairs and/or replacement, as well as claim payouts.
TOTALAMWNTOFTRANSACTIONS �:Q37.g� COSS/pEYENUE6UDGETED(CIRCLEONE) YES ao
FUNDINGSWHCE 97' R PlA 97 = 557 >4�fl pCRVRYNUMBEH cg7-2'r7z9-o�8a-27asz
FttJANCfAL iNFOHMATION: (EXPLAIN) B t , AST ^ 3OO �O�O
C, Ctg g7 = 50,OQ0
°t� - �t �
CITY OF ST. PAUL
PRELIMINARY ORDER
f In Favor
In tha Matter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following location(s):
597040 - East side of S Griggs St from Bayard Ave to Scheffer Ave.
*ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATE5
RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures)
Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.45 per front foot for a
five (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide
walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. DIaw construction
(where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be
approximately $3.33 per square foot.
All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150
feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of
the property.
MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES
For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1�0� of actual cost estimated to be
approximately $4.50 per square foot.
The Council of the City of Saint Pau1 having received the report of the Mayor upon
the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves:
7
2
3
That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives,
and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction
rates, financed by assessments and 1997 Public Improvement Aid.
That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 25th day of June, 1997,
at 4:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Ha11 and Court House
Building in the City of Saint Paul.
That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner
provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of
the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated,
COUNCILPERSONS
Yeas Nays
��lakey
�ostrom
+/�arris
iiPfegard
�rton n
v ��--z� ��� �✓LS
r�PYtune
yLAgains t
COUN FIL NO — �
B ���� %�—
File No. 597040
Voting Ward 3 �/_
W
Adopted by Council: Datel'�liti,_ I.SCI ly�`7
�� ,
Certified Passed by Council Secretary
BY ��` ._�c-}�—�/Y'�` _^,�.
Mayor
SUNIMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATION
�� ���d�►.
Ward 3
����
PROJECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALg E.S. S. GRIGGS ST. from Bayard
Ave. to Scheffer Ave.
INITIATIIITG ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public
Works as public necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint, a petition with
one (1) signer and an inspection of the walk.
EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves,
asphalt patches and disintegrated panels.
...................................................................
CITY OS ST. PAIIL COUNC�IL / F / �I LE NO_ �� ����
FINAL ORDER By �/ (/lfi�'(� ,.
File No_ 597040
Voting Ward 3
In the Matter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following location(s):
597040 - East side of 5 Griggs St from Bayard Ave to Scheffer Ave.
*ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES
��
•
RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures)
Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.45 per front foot for a five (5)
foot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide
walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction
(where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be
approximately $3.33 per square foot.
All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150
feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of
the property.
MLSLTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three £amily structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES
For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be
approximately $4.50 per square foot.
under Preliminary
The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the
above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City
Charter; and
WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations
pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now,
therefore, be it
RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the
above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed
and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it
FiIRTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City
officers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to
the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter.
COUNCILPERSONS
Yeas Nays
✓1 akey
i�ostrom
�rris /�
�Pfegard la In Favor
�orton
h� �fl,`na- �L.sc.sT � Against
une �
t �
Adopted by Council: Date 7
U
Certified Passed by Council Secretary
By�c-�_ ^i � 1 �-/�w�c✓�.ri—_„�
�. �
Mayor
-Public Hearing Date — June 25, 1997 RE 4-18-97 q� ����
DEPARTMENT/OFFICE/COUNCIL DATE INITIAiED 0
PublicWorksSidewalks 3_pg.g7 GREEN SHE No.� �1
INITIAUDATE INRIAVDATE
CONTACTPEFSON&PHONE �pEppq7).fEMDIpECTOR CITYCOUNCIL
Robert A. Lissick - 266-6121 �N cm nnorwer CITV CLEFK
IAUSTBEONCOUNCII.AC£NDAeY(DATE) ) r_7_(� 7 N pOV�ll e� � g�pGE7DIflECTOR �FIN.&MGT.SERVICESDIR.
Must be in Council Research Office � MAVOP(ORASSi5TAt3n 0 Coundf Re e�arch
b noon Frida 4-25-97
TOTAL t OF SIGNANpE PAGES 1 __ (GLIP ALL LOCA71ONS FOR 9GWITUR� � ASSOCIA7E DEPAR7TAENTAL ACWUMANT
ACTIONIiEWES1ED �� �
Reconstruct Sidewalk in Ward 3(See adtached list)
� i
RECbMMENDATroNS: Apprae (ly or Rejea (i� pEpgpNp� SERVICE COMHACTS MUST ANSWEF THE FOLLON7NG QUESTIONS:
PLANNING COMMISSIIXJ _CNIL SERVICE COMMISSION �� � m � s E�S Nfi NO f wofked Undef a COn[ract fOr ihls department?
CIe CoMMmEE 2. Has ihispersoNFirm ever been a dry amploYee?
— — YES NO
A STAFF 3. Dces this person�irm possess a swll not normalry possessed by arry current ciry
— 5 — �
DISTRICTCOUNCIL�' l _ YES NO
SUPPORTS N7iICH GOUNGL OBJECTNE? �D�am alf yas anawar5 on seperaie sheet and attach to gfwn sh0et
��"-�e�/
INRIATING PROBLEM. ISSUE.OPPORTUNI7Y (WHO. WriA7. WHEN, WHERE. WFiV):
The problem "defective sidewafk" was creffied because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade materiai, aRernating freeRhaw cycles,
service I'rfe IimRs, chemical additives, extreme tempereture variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide {eve! and must be
addressed and correeted on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk cond"Rion would worsen to a state where it would be
rendered unusable and subjed to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible Iftigations.
ADVANTAGES IF APPROVED:
The community will benefk from this project because it will provide safe detect free sidewalks for its many citizens. The sidewalk
contracts are executad by private contractors, so ft follows that private sector jobs are created as a result of this activity.
��,�.�
�.�._,_.__. , ._ �_ _._ ._ .... a"
.., .> 3. 4,J Ea7�Y
DISADVANTAGESIFAPPROVED: .__ ,::�=
Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment.
Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-ha�f the assessment is City subsidized, it still
remains coniroversial.
DISAOVANTAGES IF NOT APPpOVED:
This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal injury suits,
uftimately resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in eventual repairs and/or replacement, as well as claim payouts.
TOTALAMWNTOFTRANSACTIONS �:Q37.g� COSS/pEYENUE6UDGETED(CIRCLEONE) YES ao
FUNDINGSWHCE 97' R PlA 97 = 557 >4�fl pCRVRYNUMBEH cg7-2'r7z9-o�8a-27asz
FttJANCfAL iNFOHMATION: (EXPLAIN) B t , AST ^ 3OO �O�O
C, Ctg g7 = 50,OQ0
°t� - �t �
CITY OF ST. PAUL
PRELIMINARY ORDER
f In Favor
In tha Matter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following location(s):
597040 - East side of S Griggs St from Bayard Ave to Scheffer Ave.
*ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATE5
RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures)
Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.45 per front foot for a
five (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide
walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. DIaw construction
(where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be
approximately $3.33 per square foot.
All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150
feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of
the property.
MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES
For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1�0� of actual cost estimated to be
approximately $4.50 per square foot.
The Council of the City of Saint Pau1 having received the report of the Mayor upon
the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves:
7
2
3
That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives,
and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction
rates, financed by assessments and 1997 Public Improvement Aid.
That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 25th day of June, 1997,
at 4:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Ha11 and Court House
Building in the City of Saint Paul.
That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner
provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of
the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated,
COUNCILPERSONS
Yeas Nays
��lakey
�ostrom
+/�arris
iiPfegard
�rton n
v ��--z� ��� �✓LS
r�PYtune
yLAgains t
COUN FIL NO — �
B ���� %�—
File No. 597040
Voting Ward 3 �/_
W
Adopted by Council: Datel'�liti,_ I.SCI ly�`7
�� ,
Certified Passed by Council Secretary
BY ��` ._�c-}�—�/Y'�` _^,�.
Mayor
SUNIMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATION
�� ���d�►.
Ward 3
����
PROJECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALg E.S. S. GRIGGS ST. from Bayard
Ave. to Scheffer Ave.
INITIATIIITG ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public
Works as public necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint, a petition with
one (1) signer and an inspection of the walk.
EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves,
asphalt patches and disintegrated panels.
...................................................................