Loading...
97-811CITY OR ST. PAUL FINAI, ORDER .��� na ��. t � � �,� ��� COUNCIL FILE NO. ` 1 =� � I � By �� � File No. 597036-5 039 Voting Ward 4 Ia the Matter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following location(s): 597036 - ' e_ Fc c`�.� c,v. � 3�{ Asbv.�r� S - kJ� �"�c��ns�r�.c� ec� Q}�� e 597037 - East side of Herschel St from hields ve to W University Ave. 597038 - Both sides of N Prior Ave from Portland Ave to Ashland Ave. 597039 - East side of Simpson St from Edmund Ave to Thomas Ave at 594 Simpson St only. *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Recoastruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.45 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction iWhere no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. NIULTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new ancl reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 0£ actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. under Preliminary order ��— - L" 1 t approved ��_,� 3 ��� l'� The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City o£ficers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas /� Nays ✓ B�, akey i/B strom arris �egard � In Favor �I�orton t' ��f-e�lins- �psew��Against �/PYiune � ��5��' Adopted by Council: Date�\��� `� Certified Passed by Council Secretary By Mayor � Public Hearin Date — June 25 1997 RE 4-18-97 � Y 8-� t DEPARTMENT/OFFICE/COUNCIL DATEINITIATED GREEN SHEET NO. PUb�1C wOf�CS $Id8W2��CS 3-2&97 INITIAVDATE INRIAL/DATE COMACTPERSONBPHONE �pEpqq7A�ENTDIFECTOR �CITYCOUNCIL Robert A. Lissick - 266-6121 N�� CfiY ATTORNEY �CffY CLEFK MUSTBEONCOUNCILAGENDABY(DATE) 5-7-9 Ii0U71NG �g{�pGETDIRECTOR ❑FIN.BMGT.SEPVICESDIR Must be in Council Research Office � MAVOR(OFASSISTANn � Counal Research b noon Frida 4-25-97 � TOTAL # OF SIGNANRE PAGES 1 _(CLIP ALL LOCA71016 FOR SIGNANNE� � ASSOCIATE DEPARTMENTAL ACCOUNTANT ACTION FEWESiED �., 3T �GJ� Reconstruct Sidewatk in Ward 4{See attached list) �S �D - RECOMMENDA7lONS: Appme (!q w Peje�x (R) pEpgpNAL S CANiHACTS MUST ANSWEp THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS: PLANNit�i�MMI551�N _CNILSERVICECOMMISSION 1 . ��� EY S� ND����undefatonVaCtfOfthiSdePa��t? CIB COMMITTEE 2 Nas ihis persoNfirm ever been a dry employee? — — YES NO N S7AFF 3. Does this persoNfirm possess a sltitl not normalty possessed by any curren[ ciry — empipyee? _DISTFiIC7COUNCIL� ��� �� YES NO SUPPORTS WHICH CWNGL O&IECTNE? �P��n ell yes ensxrefs on Sepafate sheet aM altach to greBn sheat INITIATING PR08LEM, ISSUE, OPPORTUNITV (WHO, NMAT, WHEN. WHERE, WHY): The problem "defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, aRernating freefthaw cycles, service I'rfe limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide level and must be addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewaik condition would worsen to a state where it wouVd be rendered unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from talls and possible litigations. ADVANTAGES IF APPROVED: The community will benetR from this project because it wilf provide safe detect free sidewalks for iis many citizens. The sidewalk contracts are executed by private contractors, so it follows that private sector jobs are created as a resuft of this activity. ��� `.":',': `' ��" .,""" ��a�s�� E�y'f� .� � i��� DISADVAMAGES 7F APPROVED: Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment. Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half the assessmeni is.£ity,subsidized, it sti�l remains controversial. DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPFOVED: This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in tum, will generate more personaf injury suits, uftimately resulting in the expenditure of larger doliar amounts in eventual repairs and/or replacement, as well as claim payouts. TOTALAMOUMOFTRANSACTIONE SxS�Ze32 COSTIREVENUEBUDGETED(CIRCLEONE) YES NO FUNDINGSWRCE �7�M=Q667 R, PpA 97 � 557 000 ACRVITYNUMBER G97�-2T729-0784�27072 FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (EXPLAIN) ♦ ° 3OQ l QOO c, cPa 97 = 5o,00a �l'1 --�'t L CITY OF ST. PAUL COUNC FILE I30. � PRELIMINARY ORDER By�,.(�� k%CCU�� � Fi e No. 597036 97039 Voting Ward_4 In the Matter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following location(s): 597036 - Both sides of Asbury St from Thomas Ave to Lafond Ave_ 597037 - East side of Herschel St from Shields Ave to W University Ave. 597038 - Both sides of N Prior Ave from Portland Ave to Ashland Ave. 597039 - East side of Simpson St from Edmund Ave to Thomas Ave at 594 Simpson St only. *ESTiMATED COI3STRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL FZATES i0ne, two or three family structures) Reconstruct3.on (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.45 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet o£ new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100$ of ackual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1 2 3 That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1997 Public Improvement Aid. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 25th day of June, 1997, at 4:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Ha11 and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the imgrovement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays ✓Blakey (/�ostrom �Harris ✓P�egard �hIbrton �e��tR�xi-Lo� I �' ns �i'hune �In Favor u Against Adopted by Council: Date V-�r__.,._A �fl. ��{�{'�] �V� ! Certified Passed by Council Secretary By `�. ,� i��.,��._...� Mayor SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECONIMENDATIONS Ward 4 �1 �C1� PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALH B.S. ASBURY ST. from Thomas Ave. to Lafond Ave. q I1ITITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public �(�3� Works as public necessity on the basis of four (r} complaints and an inspection of the walk. ESISTING CONDITIONS: TYus walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, water pockets, asphalt patches, scaled, setfled and cracked panels. ................................................................... PROJECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALH E.S. HERSCHEL ST. from Shields Ave. to W. University Ave. at 468-474 Herschel St. Only. �03� IIITITIATING ACTION: as public necessity on walk. This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works the basis of five (5) complaints and an inspection of the EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with asphalt patches, disintegrated and cracked panels. ................................................................... PIip3ECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. N. PRIOI2 AVE. from Portland Ave. to Ashland Ave. �Lfn� IrTITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works r �� as public necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint, a petition with one (1) signer and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, settled and cracked panels. ................................................................... PROJECT• RECOTI5TRUCT SIDEWALg E.S. SIMPSON ST. form Edmund Ave. to Thomas Ae. at 594 Simpson St. Only. �l���t) INITIATIIHG ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works � as public necessity on the basis of two (2) complaintsand an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with asphait patches and settled panels. .................................................................. CITY OR ST. PAUL FINAI, ORDER .��� na ��. t � � �,� ��� COUNCIL FILE NO. ` 1 =� � I � By �� � File No. 597036-5 039 Voting Ward 4 Ia the Matter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following location(s): 597036 - ' e_ Fc c`�.� c,v. � 3�{ Asbv.�r� S - kJ� �"�c��ns�r�.c� ec� Q}�� e 597037 - East side of Herschel St from hields ve to W University Ave. 597038 - Both sides of N Prior Ave from Portland Ave to Ashland Ave. 597039 - East side of Simpson St from Edmund Ave to Thomas Ave at 594 Simpson St only. *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Recoastruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.45 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction iWhere no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. NIULTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new ancl reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 0£ actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. under Preliminary order ��— - L" 1 t approved ��_,� 3 ��� l'� The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City o£ficers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas /� Nays ✓ B�, akey i/B strom arris �egard � In Favor �I�orton t' ��f-e�lins- �psew��Against �/PYiune � ��5��' Adopted by Council: Date�\��� `� Certified Passed by Council Secretary By Mayor � Public Hearin Date — June 25 1997 RE 4-18-97 � Y 8-� t DEPARTMENT/OFFICE/COUNCIL DATEINITIATED GREEN SHEET NO. PUb�1C wOf�CS $Id8W2��CS 3-2&97 INITIAVDATE INRIAL/DATE COMACTPERSONBPHONE �pEpqq7A�ENTDIFECTOR �CITYCOUNCIL Robert A. Lissick - 266-6121 N�� CfiY ATTORNEY �CffY CLEFK MUSTBEONCOUNCILAGENDABY(DATE) 5-7-9 Ii0U71NG �g{�pGETDIRECTOR ❑FIN.BMGT.SEPVICESDIR Must be in Council Research Office � MAVOR(OFASSISTANn � Counal Research b noon Frida 4-25-97 � TOTAL # OF SIGNANRE PAGES 1 _(CLIP ALL LOCA71016 FOR SIGNANNE� � ASSOCIATE DEPARTMENTAL ACCOUNTANT ACTION FEWESiED �., 3T �GJ� Reconstruct Sidewatk in Ward 4{See attached list) �S �D - RECOMMENDA7lONS: Appme (!q w Peje�x (R) pEpgpNAL S CANiHACTS MUST ANSWEp THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS: PLANNit�i�MMI551�N _CNILSERVICECOMMISSION 1 . ��� EY S� ND����undefatonVaCtfOfthiSdePa��t? CIB COMMITTEE 2 Nas ihis persoNfirm ever been a dry employee? — — YES NO N S7AFF 3. Does this persoNfirm possess a sltitl not normalty possessed by any curren[ ciry — empipyee? _DISTFiIC7COUNCIL� ��� �� YES NO SUPPORTS WHICH CWNGL O&IECTNE? �P��n ell yes ensxrefs on Sepafate sheet aM altach to greBn sheat INITIATING PR08LEM, ISSUE, OPPORTUNITV (WHO, NMAT, WHEN. WHERE, WHY): The problem "defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, aRernating freefthaw cycles, service I'rfe limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide level and must be addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewaik condition would worsen to a state where it wouVd be rendered unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from talls and possible litigations. ADVANTAGES IF APPROVED: The community will benetR from this project because it wilf provide safe detect free sidewalks for iis many citizens. The sidewalk contracts are executed by private contractors, so it follows that private sector jobs are created as a resuft of this activity. ��� `.":',': `' ��" .,""" ��a�s�� E�y'f� .� � i��� DISADVAMAGES 7F APPROVED: Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment. Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half the assessmeni is.£ity,subsidized, it sti�l remains controversial. DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPFOVED: This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in tum, will generate more personaf injury suits, uftimately resulting in the expenditure of larger doliar amounts in eventual repairs and/or replacement, as well as claim payouts. TOTALAMOUMOFTRANSACTIONE SxS�Ze32 COSTIREVENUEBUDGETED(CIRCLEONE) YES NO FUNDINGSWRCE �7�M=Q667 R, PpA 97 � 557 000 ACRVITYNUMBER G97�-2T729-0784�27072 FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (EXPLAIN) ♦ ° 3OQ l QOO c, cPa 97 = 5o,00a �l'1 --�'t L CITY OF ST. PAUL COUNC FILE I30. � PRELIMINARY ORDER By�,.(�� k%CCU�� � Fi e No. 597036 97039 Voting Ward_4 In the Matter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following location(s): 597036 - Both sides of Asbury St from Thomas Ave to Lafond Ave_ 597037 - East side of Herschel St from Shields Ave to W University Ave. 597038 - Both sides of N Prior Ave from Portland Ave to Ashland Ave. 597039 - East side of Simpson St from Edmund Ave to Thomas Ave at 594 Simpson St only. *ESTiMATED COI3STRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL FZATES i0ne, two or three family structures) Reconstruct3.on (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.45 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet o£ new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100$ of ackual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1 2 3 That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1997 Public Improvement Aid. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 25th day of June, 1997, at 4:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Ha11 and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the imgrovement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays ✓Blakey (/�ostrom �Harris ✓P�egard �hIbrton �e��tR�xi-Lo� I �' ns �i'hune �In Favor u Against Adopted by Council: Date V-�r__.,._A �fl. ��{�{'�] �V� ! Certified Passed by Council Secretary By `�. ,� i��.,��._...� Mayor SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECONIMENDATIONS Ward 4 �1 �C1� PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALH B.S. ASBURY ST. from Thomas Ave. to Lafond Ave. q I1ITITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public �(�3� Works as public necessity on the basis of four (r} complaints and an inspection of the walk. ESISTING CONDITIONS: TYus walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, water pockets, asphalt patches, scaled, setfled and cracked panels. ................................................................... PROJECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALH E.S. HERSCHEL ST. from Shields Ave. to W. University Ave. at 468-474 Herschel St. Only. �03� IIITITIATING ACTION: as public necessity on walk. This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works the basis of five (5) complaints and an inspection of the EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with asphalt patches, disintegrated and cracked panels. ................................................................... PIip3ECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. N. PRIOI2 AVE. from Portland Ave. to Ashland Ave. �Lfn� IrTITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works r �� as public necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint, a petition with one (1) signer and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, settled and cracked panels. ................................................................... PROJECT• RECOTI5TRUCT SIDEWALg E.S. SIMPSON ST. form Edmund Ave. to Thomas Ae. at 594 Simpson St. Only. �l���t) INITIATIIHG ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works � as public necessity on the basis of two (2) complaintsand an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with asphait patches and settled panels. .................................................................. CITY OR ST. PAUL FINAI, ORDER .��� na ��. t � � �,� ��� COUNCIL FILE NO. ` 1 =� � I � By �� � File No. 597036-5 039 Voting Ward 4 Ia the Matter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following location(s): 597036 - ' e_ Fc c`�.� c,v. � 3�{ Asbv.�r� S - kJ� �"�c��ns�r�.c� ec� Q}�� e 597037 - East side of Herschel St from hields ve to W University Ave. 597038 - Both sides of N Prior Ave from Portland Ave to Ashland Ave. 597039 - East side of Simpson St from Edmund Ave to Thomas Ave at 594 Simpson St only. *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Recoastruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.45 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction iWhere no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. NIULTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new ancl reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 0£ actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. under Preliminary order ��— - L" 1 t approved ��_,� 3 ��� l'� The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City o£ficers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas /� Nays ✓ B�, akey i/B strom arris �egard � In Favor �I�orton t' ��f-e�lins- �psew��Against �/PYiune � ��5��' Adopted by Council: Date�\��� `� Certified Passed by Council Secretary By Mayor � Public Hearin Date — June 25 1997 RE 4-18-97 � Y 8-� t DEPARTMENT/OFFICE/COUNCIL DATEINITIATED GREEN SHEET NO. PUb�1C wOf�CS $Id8W2��CS 3-2&97 INITIAVDATE INRIAL/DATE COMACTPERSONBPHONE �pEpqq7A�ENTDIFECTOR �CITYCOUNCIL Robert A. Lissick - 266-6121 N�� CfiY ATTORNEY �CffY CLEFK MUSTBEONCOUNCILAGENDABY(DATE) 5-7-9 Ii0U71NG �g{�pGETDIRECTOR ❑FIN.BMGT.SEPVICESDIR Must be in Council Research Office � MAVOR(OFASSISTANn � Counal Research b noon Frida 4-25-97 � TOTAL # OF SIGNANRE PAGES 1 _(CLIP ALL LOCA71016 FOR SIGNANNE� � ASSOCIATE DEPARTMENTAL ACCOUNTANT ACTION FEWESiED �., 3T �GJ� Reconstruct Sidewatk in Ward 4{See attached list) �S �D - RECOMMENDA7lONS: Appme (!q w Peje�x (R) pEpgpNAL S CANiHACTS MUST ANSWEp THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS: PLANNit�i�MMI551�N _CNILSERVICECOMMISSION 1 . ��� EY S� ND����undefatonVaCtfOfthiSdePa��t? CIB COMMITTEE 2 Nas ihis persoNfirm ever been a dry employee? — — YES NO N S7AFF 3. Does this persoNfirm possess a sltitl not normalty possessed by any curren[ ciry — empipyee? _DISTFiIC7COUNCIL� ��� �� YES NO SUPPORTS WHICH CWNGL O&IECTNE? �P��n ell yes ensxrefs on Sepafate sheet aM altach to greBn sheat INITIATING PR08LEM, ISSUE, OPPORTUNITV (WHO, NMAT, WHEN. WHERE, WHY): The problem "defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, aRernating freefthaw cycles, service I'rfe limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide level and must be addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewaik condition would worsen to a state where it wouVd be rendered unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from talls and possible litigations. ADVANTAGES IF APPROVED: The community will benetR from this project because it wilf provide safe detect free sidewalks for iis many citizens. The sidewalk contracts are executed by private contractors, so it follows that private sector jobs are created as a resuft of this activity. ��� `.":',': `' ��" .,""" ��a�s�� E�y'f� .� � i��� DISADVAMAGES 7F APPROVED: Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment. Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half the assessmeni is.£ity,subsidized, it sti�l remains controversial. DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPFOVED: This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in tum, will generate more personaf injury suits, uftimately resulting in the expenditure of larger doliar amounts in eventual repairs and/or replacement, as well as claim payouts. TOTALAMOUMOFTRANSACTIONE SxS�Ze32 COSTIREVENUEBUDGETED(CIRCLEONE) YES NO FUNDINGSWRCE �7�M=Q667 R, PpA 97 � 557 000 ACRVITYNUMBER G97�-2T729-0784�27072 FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (EXPLAIN) ♦ ° 3OQ l QOO c, cPa 97 = 5o,00a �l'1 --�'t L CITY OF ST. PAUL COUNC FILE I30. � PRELIMINARY ORDER By�,.(�� k%CCU�� � Fi e No. 597036 97039 Voting Ward_4 In the Matter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following location(s): 597036 - Both sides of Asbury St from Thomas Ave to Lafond Ave_ 597037 - East side of Herschel St from Shields Ave to W University Ave. 597038 - Both sides of N Prior Ave from Portland Ave to Ashland Ave. 597039 - East side of Simpson St from Edmund Ave to Thomas Ave at 594 Simpson St only. *ESTiMATED COI3STRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL FZATES i0ne, two or three family structures) Reconstruct3.on (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.45 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet o£ new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100$ of ackual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1 2 3 That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1997 Public Improvement Aid. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 25th day of June, 1997, at 4:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Ha11 and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the imgrovement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays ✓Blakey (/�ostrom �Harris ✓P�egard �hIbrton �e��tR�xi-Lo� I �' ns �i'hune �In Favor u Against Adopted by Council: Date V-�r__.,._A �fl. ��{�{'�] �V� ! Certified Passed by Council Secretary By `�. ,� i��.,��._...� Mayor SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECONIMENDATIONS Ward 4 �1 �C1� PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALH B.S. ASBURY ST. from Thomas Ave. to Lafond Ave. q I1ITITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public �(�3� Works as public necessity on the basis of four (r} complaints and an inspection of the walk. ESISTING CONDITIONS: TYus walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, water pockets, asphalt patches, scaled, setfled and cracked panels. ................................................................... PROJECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALH E.S. HERSCHEL ST. from Shields Ave. to W. University Ave. at 468-474 Herschel St. Only. �03� IIITITIATING ACTION: as public necessity on walk. This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works the basis of five (5) complaints and an inspection of the EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with asphalt patches, disintegrated and cracked panels. ................................................................... PIip3ECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. N. PRIOI2 AVE. from Portland Ave. to Ashland Ave. �Lfn� IrTITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works r �� as public necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint, a petition with one (1) signer and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, settled and cracked panels. ................................................................... PROJECT• RECOTI5TRUCT SIDEWALg E.S. SIMPSON ST. form Edmund Ave. to Thomas Ae. at 594 Simpson St. Only. �l���t) INITIATIIHG ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works � as public necessity on the basis of two (2) complaintsand an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with asphait patches and settled panels. ..................................................................