The URL can be used to link to this page

97-809CITY OF ST. PAIIL FII3AL ORDER a� - �09 COUNCIL ILE NO. $S' / � File�o._5 3 , 5970 4 Vot g War 1 In the Matter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following locations: 597033 - East 5ide of North Grotto St from Lafond Ave to Blair Ave. 597034 - Both sides of Marion St from Aurora Ave to W University Ave *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Recosistruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.45 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. A11 corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MTJLTI-RE5IDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. under Preliminary order � t �� approved �� l�_ c The Council o£ the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays �lakey ✓Bostrom ��rris ✓�Iegard �rton h� Co�I�v�S � �In Favor � Against ` i�bse r��' Adopted by Council: Date�9�1`� Certified Passed by Council 5ecretary BY � � � c� _ � �/(�,�,, Mayor Public Hearing Date — June 25, 1997 RE 4-18-97 a �� (� �� OEPAPTMENT/OFFICE/COUNCIL DATEINRIA7ED GREEN SHEET �NO. ` � Public Works Sidewalks 3-28'9� INIiIAVDATE wrruvoa� COMACTPERSON8PHONE �pEPARTMENT01flECTOfl �CITVCOUNCIL RobertA. Lissick-2666127 N ��N � �cmnrroAr+Er �cmc�aK MUSTBEONCOUNCILAGENOABY(DAit� 5—�-97 HOUTING �g�Jp��{DIflECTOR �FIN.&MGT.SERVICESDI Must be in Gouncil Research Office � MAYOR(ORASSISTAN'n 10 Counai Research b noon Frida 4-25-97 � T07AL i OF S7GtU1NqE PAGES 1 _(CLIP ALL LOCA7101C. FOR SIGWINR� � ASS�CIA7E � PAR7MEMAL AGCOUNTANT ACTION REWESTED ��"�7 Reconstruct Sidewalk in Ward 1(See attached list) . Sg7o 1- RECOMMENOATroNS: b�a+e (W or Hejaa (R7 PERSONAL SEiiVICE CONTPACiS UfU3T ANSWEH THE FOLLOWING Ql7fEST10NS: PLANNIPIGCOlAMtSSION _CNIL SEfiVICE COMMISSqN �� m� E�S � NO� �� urMer a con[ract fw Nis deparOnent? CIB COMMVTTEE 2. Nas this person/Firtn ever been a ary employee? — — VES NO A ssppF 3. Oces this person/firtn possess a skill not noimalN P�sessed by any current ciry — — employee? DISSAIC7CAUNCIL � VES NO St}PPORTS WFIICH COUNCILO&IEC7NE? �P�� all yes answors on saparate sheet aM attaeh to green sheet WA� l INI7IATING PROBLEM. ISSUE.OPPOq7UNITY (WHO, WHAT. WHEN, WHERE, WH1�: The problem "defactive sidewalk" was created because of Vee roots, deleterious subgrade material, attemating freerthaw cycles, service I'rfe lim8s, chemical additives, eMreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a cdywide �evel and must be addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, tha sidewaik condition would worsen to a state where it would be rsndered unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible Iftigations. . �,��'�� ADVANTAGES iF APPROVED: ,e � �'�, The community will benefit from this project because it will provide safe detect free sidewalks for fts rt�` ¢ens. The sidewalk R� contracts are executed by private contractors, so it tollows that private sector jobs are creaied as a res � activdy. DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED: Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment. Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it still remains controversial. �.- - �d.,: _:_a _. . - ' i'�..� � . �. `� i,,:�: DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED: _. _ . This option would allow the infmstructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will ge�erate more Qersonal injury suits, uRimately resulting in the expenditure of larger dollaz amounts in eventual repairs and/or replacement, as well as claim payouts_ TOTALAMWMOFTIipNSACTIONS !f� H�} CC�ST/REVENUEBUDGETED(CIqCLEONE) YES x0 FlINDINGSWHCE 97^M�OCIE2J A. RfA �� ° SS7,QQO ACITVfTYNUMBER C —2T Z^O 8�F^2 0� FINANCIALINFORMATION:(EXPLAIM 6,. ASt = 3�Q,OOd C, CFa 97 = 50,000 al � - 8oq SiJNIMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATIONS Ward 1 Sg�o3 pROJECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALH E.S. N. GROTI'O ST. from Lafond 3 Ave. to Blair Ave. IIvITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of one (1} compiaint, a petition with one (1} signer and an inspection of the walk. EBISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with offgrade panels, asphalt patches scaled and settled panels. ................................................................... So�? R • RE N TR IDEW H B.S. MARION ST. from Aurora Ave. to W. University Ave. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of two (2) complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with asphalt patches, settled and cracked panels. .................................................................. � CITY OF ST. PAT1L ORDRR I In Favor 2n the iiatter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following locations: 597033 - East side of North Grotto St from Lafond Ave to Blair Ave. 597034 - Both sides of Marion St from Aurora Ave to W University Ave *ESTIMATEB CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruation (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.45 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk_ All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL than three family structures), NON-RSSIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of.actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and havinq considered said report, hereby resolves: 1 `a 3 That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, £inanced by assessments and 1997 Public Improvement Aid. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 25th day of June, 1997, at 4:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS � Yeas Nays V Blakey � V tiarris �egard �orton ✓��=C�. I 1; ns �hune QAgainst �t'1- �"� 9. �- COUNCIL FILE NO. By Fi No. 59703 97034 Voting rd 1 � Adopted by Council: Certified Passed by Council 5ecretary By Mayor CITY OF ST. PAIIL FII3AL ORDER a� - �09 COUNCIL ILE NO. $S' / � File�o._5 3 , 5970 4 Vot g War 1 In the Matter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following locations: 597033 - East 5ide of North Grotto St from Lafond Ave to Blair Ave. 597034 - Both sides of Marion St from Aurora Ave to W University Ave *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Recosistruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.45 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. A11 corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MTJLTI-RE5IDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. under Preliminary order � t �� approved �� l�_ c The Council o£ the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays �lakey ✓Bostrom ��rris ✓�Iegard �rton h� Co�I�v�S � �In Favor � Against ` i�bse r��' Adopted by Council: Date�9�1`� Certified Passed by Council 5ecretary BY � � � c� _ � �/(�,�,, Mayor Public Hearing Date — June 25, 1997 RE 4-18-97 a �� (� �� OEPAPTMENT/OFFICE/COUNCIL DATEINRIA7ED GREEN SHEET �NO. ` � Public Works Sidewalks 3-28'9� INIiIAVDATE wrruvoa� COMACTPERSON8PHONE �pEPARTMENT01flECTOfl �CITVCOUNCIL RobertA. Lissick-2666127 N ��N � �cmnrroAr+Er �cmc�aK MUSTBEONCOUNCILAGENOABY(DAit� 5—�-97 HOUTING �g�Jp��{DIflECTOR �FIN.&MGT.SERVICESDI Must be in Gouncil Research Office � MAYOR(ORASSISTAN'n 10 Counai Research b noon Frida 4-25-97 � T07AL i OF S7GtU1NqE PAGES 1 _(CLIP ALL LOCA7101C. FOR SIGWINR� � ASS�CIA7E � PAR7MEMAL AGCOUNTANT ACTION REWESTED ��"�7 Reconstruct Sidewalk in Ward 1(See attached list) . Sg7o 1- RECOMMENOATroNS: b�a+e (W or Hejaa (R7 PERSONAL SEiiVICE CONTPACiS UfU3T ANSWEH THE FOLLOWING Ql7fEST10NS: PLANNIPIGCOlAMtSSION _CNIL SEfiVICE COMMISSqN �� m� E�S � NO� �� urMer a con[ract fw Nis deparOnent? CIB COMMVTTEE 2. Nas this person/Firtn ever been a ary employee? — — VES NO A ssppF 3. Oces this person/firtn possess a skill not noimalN P�sessed by any current ciry — — employee? DISSAIC7CAUNCIL � VES NO St}PPORTS WFIICH COUNCILO&IEC7NE? �P�� all yes answors on saparate sheet aM attaeh to green sheet WA� l INI7IATING PROBLEM. ISSUE.OPPOq7UNITY (WHO, WHAT. WHEN, WHERE, WH1�: The problem "defactive sidewalk" was created because of Vee roots, deleterious subgrade material, attemating freerthaw cycles, service I'rfe lim8s, chemical additives, eMreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a cdywide �evel and must be addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, tha sidewaik condition would worsen to a state where it would be rsndered unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible Iftigations. . �,��'�� ADVANTAGES iF APPROVED: ,e � �'�, The community will benefit from this project because it will provide safe detect free sidewalks for fts rt�` ¢ens. The sidewalk R� contracts are executed by private contractors, so it tollows that private sector jobs are creaied as a res � activdy. DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED: Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment. Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it still remains controversial. �.- - �d.,: _:_a _. . - ' i'�..� � . �. `� i,,:�: DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED: _. _ . This option would allow the infmstructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will ge�erate more Qersonal injury suits, uRimately resulting in the expenditure of larger dollaz amounts in eventual repairs and/or replacement, as well as claim payouts_ TOTALAMWMOFTIipNSACTIONS !f� H�} CC�ST/REVENUEBUDGETED(CIqCLEONE) YES x0 FlINDINGSWHCE 97^M�OCIE2J A. RfA �� ° SS7,QQO ACITVfTYNUMBER C —2T Z^O 8�F^2 0� FINANCIALINFORMATION:(EXPLAIM 6,. ASt = 3�Q,OOd C, CFa 97 = 50,000 al � - 8oq SiJNIMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATIONS Ward 1 Sg�o3 pROJECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALH E.S. N. GROTI'O ST. from Lafond 3 Ave. to Blair Ave. IIvITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of one (1} compiaint, a petition with one (1} signer and an inspection of the walk. EBISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with offgrade panels, asphalt patches scaled and settled panels. ................................................................... So�? R • RE N TR IDEW H B.S. MARION ST. from Aurora Ave. to W. University Ave. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of two (2) complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with asphalt patches, settled and cracked panels. .................................................................. � CITY OF ST. PAT1L ORDRR I In Favor 2n the iiatter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following locations: 597033 - East side of North Grotto St from Lafond Ave to Blair Ave. 597034 - Both sides of Marion St from Aurora Ave to W University Ave *ESTIMATEB CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruation (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.45 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk_ All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL than three family structures), NON-RSSIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of.actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and havinq considered said report, hereby resolves: 1 `a 3 That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, £inanced by assessments and 1997 Public Improvement Aid. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 25th day of June, 1997, at 4:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS � Yeas Nays V Blakey � V tiarris �egard �orton ✓��=C�. I 1; ns �hune QAgainst �t'1- �"� 9. �- COUNCIL FILE NO. By Fi No. 59703 97034 Voting rd 1 � Adopted by Council: Certified Passed by Council 5ecretary By Mayor CITY OF ST. PAIIL FII3AL ORDER a� - �09 COUNCIL ILE NO. $S' / � File�o._5 3 , 5970 4 Vot g War 1 In the Matter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following locations: 597033 - East 5ide of North Grotto St from Lafond Ave to Blair Ave. 597034 - Both sides of Marion St from Aurora Ave to W University Ave *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Recosistruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.45 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. A11 corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MTJLTI-RE5IDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. under Preliminary order � t �� approved �� l�_ c The Council o£ the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays �lakey ✓Bostrom ��rris ✓�Iegard �rton h� Co�I�v�S � �In Favor � Against ` i�bse r��' Adopted by Council: Date�9�1`� Certified Passed by Council 5ecretary BY � � � c� _ � �/(�,�,, Mayor Public Hearing Date — June 25, 1997 RE 4-18-97 a �� (� �� OEPAPTMENT/OFFICE/COUNCIL DATEINRIA7ED GREEN SHEET �NO. ` � Public Works Sidewalks 3-28'9� INIiIAVDATE wrruvoa� COMACTPERSON8PHONE �pEPARTMENT01flECTOfl �CITVCOUNCIL RobertA. Lissick-2666127 N ��N � �cmnrroAr+Er �cmc�aK MUSTBEONCOUNCILAGENOABY(DAit� 5—�-97 HOUTING �g�Jp��{DIflECTOR �FIN.&MGT.SERVICESDI Must be in Gouncil Research Office � MAYOR(ORASSISTAN'n 10 Counai Research b noon Frida 4-25-97 � T07AL i OF S7GtU1NqE PAGES 1 _(CLIP ALL LOCA7101C. FOR SIGWINR� � ASS�CIA7E � PAR7MEMAL AGCOUNTANT ACTION REWESTED ��"�7 Reconstruct Sidewalk in Ward 1(See attached list) . Sg7o 1- RECOMMENOATroNS: b�a+e (W or Hejaa (R7 PERSONAL SEiiVICE CONTPACiS UfU3T ANSWEH THE FOLLOWING Ql7fEST10NS: PLANNIPIGCOlAMtSSION _CNIL SEfiVICE COMMISSqN �� m� E�S � NO� �� urMer a con[ract fw Nis deparOnent? CIB COMMVTTEE 2. Nas this person/Firtn ever been a ary employee? — — VES NO A ssppF 3. Oces this person/firtn possess a skill not noimalN P�sessed by any current ciry — — employee? DISSAIC7CAUNCIL � VES NO St}PPORTS WFIICH COUNCILO&IEC7NE? �P�� all yes answors on saparate sheet aM attaeh to green sheet WA� l INI7IATING PROBLEM. ISSUE.OPPOq7UNITY (WHO, WHAT. WHEN, WHERE, WH1�: The problem "defactive sidewalk" was created because of Vee roots, deleterious subgrade material, attemating freerthaw cycles, service I'rfe lim8s, chemical additives, eMreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a cdywide �evel and must be addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, tha sidewaik condition would worsen to a state where it would be rsndered unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible Iftigations. . �,��'�� ADVANTAGES iF APPROVED: ,e � �'�, The community will benefit from this project because it will provide safe detect free sidewalks for fts rt�` ¢ens. The sidewalk R� contracts are executed by private contractors, so it tollows that private sector jobs are creaied as a res � activdy. DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED: Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment. Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it still remains controversial. �.- - �d.,: _:_a _. . - ' i'�..� � . �. `� i,,:�: DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED: _. _ . This option would allow the infmstructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will ge�erate more Qersonal injury suits, uRimately resulting in the expenditure of larger dollaz amounts in eventual repairs and/or replacement, as well as claim payouts_ TOTALAMWMOFTIipNSACTIONS !f� H�} CC�ST/REVENUEBUDGETED(CIqCLEONE) YES x0 FlINDINGSWHCE 97^M�OCIE2J A. RfA �� ° SS7,QQO ACITVfTYNUMBER C —2T Z^O 8�F^2 0� FINANCIALINFORMATION:(EXPLAIM 6,. ASt = 3�Q,OOd C, CFa 97 = 50,000 al � - 8oq SiJNIMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATIONS Ward 1 Sg�o3 pROJECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALH E.S. N. GROTI'O ST. from Lafond 3 Ave. to Blair Ave. IIvITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of one (1} compiaint, a petition with one (1} signer and an inspection of the walk. EBISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with offgrade panels, asphalt patches scaled and settled panels. ................................................................... So�? R • RE N TR IDEW H B.S. MARION ST. from Aurora Ave. to W. University Ave. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of two (2) complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with asphalt patches, settled and cracked panels. .................................................................. � CITY OF ST. PAT1L ORDRR I In Favor 2n the iiatter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following locations: 597033 - East side of North Grotto St from Lafond Ave to Blair Ave. 597034 - Both sides of Marion St from Aurora Ave to W University Ave *ESTIMATEB CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruation (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.45 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk_ All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL than three family structures), NON-RSSIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of.actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and havinq considered said report, hereby resolves: 1 `a 3 That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, £inanced by assessments and 1997 Public Improvement Aid. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 25th day of June, 1997, at 4:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS � Yeas Nays V Blakey � V tiarris �egard �orton ✓��=C�. I 1; ns �hune QAgainst �t'1- �"� 9. �- COUNCIL FILE NO. By Fi No. 59703 97034 Voting rd 1 � Adopted by Council: Certified Passed by Council 5ecretary By Mayor