The URL can be used to link to this page

97-670� y 8t � . ►` ' . . 5 .} � CSTY �R ST. PAUL tr�var- ORDER �: �, 7 Ir� the Matter cf R�r_.ca�Lnictiti:n ci �iu'e�+°al'� ai. 35r, Jack3 n�t-, �g2 �ic�u� �t, 894 �a_yrie Aue,, i33is S�GQll07.3 Ave., 21s0 S�].�.IV7�CEY' AYE. 82Yd ZZ$� i'toss Aee. � .5t( i ►, � h'F.�TL7 pd'�'TaT AT .''' {(_Yle, '�WO Oi thrBB faIIl.li_Y s't.�llCtUi'23i , Recansi-suatian {replacement af o2d-sidewalk) -$?.A5 per� frant foot fcr a fiv� {5} foot wide walk and $8.44 per frant foot for a six (6p paot wide waik. Z�1 other wi�ths will be prarate�' according]:y:' New eonstruation {where no walk existedt - S40% af the actusl aost estimateci to be aggr�xi�atel� r3.33 p�r sc;uar� foc±, P11 corner reaidentiai praperties will receive a aredit up to the tirst 150 fP4?�C c�f net+r or z�ecc�nstrurted sidew�lk sio�?g and &T�utiing the R7ong sida�* of the prngerty. s r T - F4'T � tdTr i{Mor� th�n three famil r struotur��} , N'u �°�I;} .g3`��;, ��T��x �or nEw snd reecnstruatEd sidawalle; 3000 �f �etusl cast �stimate� t� ha agproxi?nstely $4.50 ger squase foot. u�xder Prel�tinary �r�nr �' \ — 3 y �, �AFrc �� o� � 1 �.—�__ The Council of th� City vf Saint Peu1 h�s c�r.dusvts� � guhlic heasing u�*r. n che above improvesrtent, a�ue rzotiae theraef lxaviny been giver� as �rescribed �y rhe City Chz�rter; and ��, The Colnail I heard all p7�i30II8, objactians an� rECammendaUiona pertaining ta «aid proposed improvement anc2 has fully considered the same; now, tharafara, 3ae it REu�cii,VED, Tt,at_ tr,a t�'a oi the City a� 5aint P�u_ �oe� hereby �r�er �ha� tne s�c=re-ciescrih�d im�revement be m&de, ar.� the presper City efficers ara 3xere�;= :2irected and authorizad to proaeed with ths improvement; and be it FURTIiER RE36LVED, Tnat upoxi the acmpleLic+n of said iaiprovement, tize proper City officars shai3 caloui��s ail exrzr.sc�s inc�arre� therein and shall rerort �lze same to the City Council in accordance with C�apter 14 of the City �harter. Ye Pa�ys �T�la7�:.v .. �strom �arr_s M D'P�a � 'r yBPu a_.i— ✓ -�� =CoIL.a �aune L Sn Faeor _Q��$ins� Adopted by Council: Date `��j� \�� C�rtifiecs' Psa�e� by �3ur.cii ��r�rEt�ry ,.� �yar Public -Hearir<g Date — May 28, 1997 RE 3-21-97 �l�—�p�� DEPAFTMENT/OFFICEtt;4UNCIL DA7EINRIATED GREEN SHEET No. 32226 Public Works Sidewalks 2-25-9� INITIAUDATE iNrcwwnrE CONTACTPEIiSONBPHONE �DFPARTMENTDIFECTOF ❑CfTYCOUNCIL Robert A Lissick - 266-6086 ��N CITY ATTORNEY �CfTYCLERK NUM9EH WH MUST BE ON COUNCIL AGENDA 6Y (DATEj !}—()—(j ] ROU7ING � g�p�E7 DIRECTOR � FIN. & MGT. SEflVICES DIF. Must be in Council Research Office � MAYOfl(ORASSISTAN'n 1�Counal Research b noon Frida 3-28-97 ❑ TOTALtOF31GIWNpEPAGES 1 _ (CL{VALLLOCAl(ONSFORSIGNANREti �RSSOCIAlE AR7AIENTM1�aCCIX1tl�ANT ACTIONflEWES7ED � a - 7 Reconstruct Sidewalk in Ward 5��ee attached list) F1t.5.iYD• O 2 RECOAIMENDATIONS: Appmve (y w Rejec[ (fll pEpSONAL SERVICE COMRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS: PLANNING COAIMISSION _ CNIL SERYICE CAMMI$$ION 1. Has if1i5 pef50Nf1 N Vdf Nrolked Ufldel 8 COn[iett fOf Ihls d2Flaltrneftt? Y CIB COMMIT'fEE Z Has Utis pe[SOnR�n ever heen a dty efllployee? — — YES NO A SiAFf 3. Does �his persaVfirm possess a skill not rrormalty possessed by any wrtent city employee? _ DISTR�T CouNCIL �y� S (. �P��n all yes nswars on separate sheat and atWeh to green sheet SUPPOHTS WHK)H COUNCIL OBJECTNE? NE� w MlITIpTINCa PR08LEM, ISSUE.OPPOR7UNIT' (NMO, Nh1AT, NE . WHERE. WFfn: The problem "defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, aRernating freeRhaw cycles, service life limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occ�r on a citywide level and must be addressed and corrected o� an a��uat basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusable and subjed to increased pedestrian injuries from falis and possible Idigations. ADVANTAGESIFAPPROVED: The communi[y will benefit from this project because it will provide safe detect free sidewalks for its many citizens. The sidewalk contracts are executed by private contractors, so it follows that private sector jobs are created as a resuft of this activity. DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED: Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment. Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it still remains controversial. ��'w,r s.E _.,,.m� �,`s P `'�v�' � �. ��ti: �:4 (J a lb�� DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED: This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in'ttirm,-wifl }enerate mote_personal,�njury suits, uftimately resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in eventual repairs and/or replacement, as well as claim payouts. TOTALAM�UNT�FTRANSACTlONS � S � 3•00 �ST/flEVENUEBUDGETED(CIRCLEONE) YES NO FUNDINGSOURCE 9]mNf^06�] A PPA 97 = 557.040 ACITVffYNUMBER C97-2T729-0784-27012 FINANCIAL INPORMATION: (EXPLAIN) S � AST Q = 300 a 000 C� CCB J/ = SQxOOO S5�o3z SUMMAR.Y OF ENGINEERING RECOMMEI3UATION �—` �-�� Ward 5 PROJECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK E.S. JACKSON ST. from Granite St. to Cayuga St. & S.S. CAYLTGA ST. from Jackson St. to Agate St. at 856 Jackson St. Only. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessify on the basis of two (2) complaints, a petition with one (1) signer and an inspectian of the waik. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, settled and cracked panels. ................................................................... 59�o3z. SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATIONS G Ward 6 PRO�IECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALg N.S. JENKS AVE. from Weide St. to Arcade St. at 991 Arcade St. Only. Il�iITIATiNG ACTION; This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint, a petition with one (1} signer and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with water pockets, offgrade and settled panels. ................................................................... PROJECT• RECONSTI2UCT SIDEWALK E.S. PAYNE AVE. from Railroad 17acks to Wadena Ave. at 844 Payne Ave. Only. I1IRTIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with asphalt patches and setfled panels. ................................................................... �59 � o3z� SiIMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATIONS C1�—�p Ward 7 PROJECT• RECOi�SSTRUCT SIDEWALg S.S. AI.GONQUIN AVE. from Nokomis Ave. to Iroquois Ave. at 838 Iroquois Ave. Only. II�RTIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of one {1) complaint, a petition with one (1) signer and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with asphalt patches and settled panels. ................................................................... PROJECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK W.S. NORTOrTIA AVE. from Escanaba Ave. to Stiliwater Ave. at 2130 Stillwater Ave. Only. IPTITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of two (2) complaints, a petition with one (1) signer and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves and asphalt patches. ................................................................... PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK N.S. ROSS AVE. from Waukon Ave. to N. Howard St. at 2189 Ross Ave. Only. IriITIATING ACTION: This order was intiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of a petition with one (1) signer and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITION�: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves and asphalt patches. n CITY OR ST. PAUL BRELIMINARY ORD�R � In Favor I� the Matter oE Reconstruction of �idayrslk at 85F� �7�_r.k�on St., 991 Arr_.�de St. 894 Payne Ave., S3$ Iroquois Ave., 2130 StillwatEr Ave. axzd 2189 Ross Ave. u: � � . � �. j3�,�jpF.NT__ IFT�. RATF.4 (Qne, two or three family structuree) Reconstruation (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.95 per front foot for a five (5) fo�t roride walk and $H.94 per front £aot for A 91Y. (6y foot wide walk. All Cther widths will be prorated accc,rdinyly. New aonstruation (where no walk er.isCed) - 100& of ttxe actual cc�st estimated to be approximately $3.33 per �quare foot. All corner residential propertias will receive a credit up to the firat 15p feet ef new or reconstructed sidewalk elong and abuttiny the "long side" c�f the property. MtJr.Tr-__ PF (More than three family strurturea}, IsON-�R7DFNT7__�1_�AmFq Fvr new and recanstructed sidewalk; 100� �f actual cvst estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square f�ot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered 3aid report, hereby re9olvea: 1. That the �aid report and the same is hereby approvsd with na alternative�, and that the estimated cost thereof is iSEE ABUVE for estimated construction rate�, financed b}= assessments and 1997 Fublic Improvement Aid. 2 3 That a public hearing be had an said improvement on the 2Bth day of May, i997 et 9:30 0' u n M _ in the Council chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of 8aint Paul. That notice of said public hearinq be given to the peraons and in the manner provided by the charter, stating the time end place �f hearirig, the i7ature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays ��akey ✓k3o5trom ✓�arris � rhor�,J ✓�eqard �ttman V`�iUi1e � Against �� Fa � 1 CU ' FILE � Sf�� y i _, - ✓ _ �� File Pdo. 7 Vo'�.ng W + 5, 6, 7 Adopted by Council: Date��,�,q�� Certified Pas�ed by Ceuncil Secretary BY c� . �� Hieyar � CITY F � � e : o �� a 6_ A[e�€�?lill y - si I a h � �85� - �c6� Saint Paul City Council Public Hearing Notice Public Improvement Construction OWNER OR TAXPAYER � �� c�-b c7 COUNCIL DISTRICT #5,6,7 ,_ PLANNING COUNCIL �02,05,06 ... ...... .... -- FILE � :5�7�3�=:;-:'<::.;;:;=� __--. PROPERTY ADDRESS PARCEL ID ..:,...:::,r:-;;: . .... .... .:.:. ... ``:-:�?::,,':;�:.._:;: PROPERTY TAX DESCRIPTION THE TIME: WEDNESDAY, MAY 28, 1997 AT 4:30 P.M. PUBLIC PLACE: City Council Chambers, 3rd Floor City Haii-Court House HEARING Written or oral statements by any owner will be considered by the Council at this hearing. PURPOSE ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT INFORMATION ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT CALCULATION To consider approval of the proposed project as foilows: RECONSTRUCTION OF SIDEWALK AT 856 JACKSON STREE7, 991 ARCADE STREE7, 844 PAYNE AVENUE, 838 IROQUOIS AVENUE, 2130 STILLWATER AVENUE AND 2759 ROSS AVENUE. if the City Council approves the project, ali or part of the cost wili be assessed against the benefitted properties. The ESTIMATED assessment for the above property is NOTE: THIS IS NOT A BILL! Please see PAYMENT INFORMATiON on the reverse side of this notice. F _. ; - r , � _ . _ �:.�� .� �� . . -, . . . ..._, y� .��' CONTINUED ON REVERSE SIDE NOTIFICATION DATE: 05/o9/s7 �-� b ��•sz�,�� RESIDENTiAL- RATES (One, two or three family structures) - ��coa iiict�a� (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.45 per front foot K��srv.'vNV✓x:0� Por a five (5) foot wide sidewalk and $8.94 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide sidewalk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. i4es�;n�oas�iuc�ioii (where no walk existed) - 100$ of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the 3o�q�:s�i�$ of the property. pJIILTI-RESZDENTIAL (More than thTee family structures) and NONRESI- DENR'IAL RATES - For new � reconstructed sidewalk: 100% of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. g3,EASE NoTE: Reconstruction will be at the existing width. Public Works will reconstruct some existing sidewalk that is 6 feet wide down to 5 feet wide in all cases where this is practical. This smaller width (5 feet) is to keep the assessment at the lowest rate. If your walk is 6 feet wide and you and your neighbors prefer that width and are willing to accept the higher assessment rate, please contact the Sidewalk Division at 266-6120 to request your preference. All:",�netiv�;:�sidei.�alks';�wii;l��e='�constrilcte3�::5�� fee ° tii3d � ,� z:. .__......_....r_......,......_....,..�....,..,�5 _. Sidewalk reconstruction may consist of replacing from one panel to all of the panels in front of your property. The ES2IMATED ASSESSMENT CALCBLATION on your notice shows the number of feet to be replaced. For questions regarding the construction and/or reconstruction of your sidewalk, please call 266-6120. � y 8t � . ►` ' . . 5 .} � CSTY �R ST. PAUL tr�var- ORDER �: �, 7 Ir� the Matter cf R�r_.ca�Lnictiti:n ci �iu'e�+°al'� ai. 35r, Jack3 n�t-, �g2 �ic�u� �t, 894 �a_yrie Aue,, i33is S�GQll07.3 Ave., 21s0 S�].�.IV7�CEY' AYE. 82Yd ZZ$� i'toss Aee. � .5t( i ►, � h'F.�TL7 pd'�'TaT AT .''' {(_Yle, '�WO Oi thrBB faIIl.li_Y s't.�llCtUi'23i , Recansi-suatian {replacement af o2d-sidewalk) -$?.A5 per� frant foot fcr a fiv� {5} foot wide walk and $8.44 per frant foot for a six (6p paot wide waik. Z�1 other wi�ths will be prarate�' according]:y:' New eonstruation {where no walk existedt - S40% af the actusl aost estimateci to be aggr�xi�atel� r3.33 p�r sc;uar� foc±, P11 corner reaidentiai praperties will receive a aredit up to the tirst 150 fP4?�C c�f net+r or z�ecc�nstrurted sidew�lk sio�?g and &T�utiing the R7ong sida�* of the prngerty. s r T - F4'T � tdTr i{Mor� th�n three famil r struotur��} , N'u �°�I;} .g3`��;, ��T��x �or nEw snd reecnstruatEd sidawalle; 3000 �f �etusl cast �stimate� t� ha agproxi?nstely $4.50 ger squase foot. u�xder Prel�tinary �r�nr �' \ — 3 y �, �AFrc �� o� � 1 �.—�__ The Council of th� City vf Saint Peu1 h�s c�r.dusvts� � guhlic heasing u�*r. n che above improvesrtent, a�ue rzotiae theraef lxaviny been giver� as �rescribed �y rhe City Chz�rter; and ��, The Colnail I heard all p7�i30II8, objactians an� rECammendaUiona pertaining ta «aid proposed improvement anc2 has fully considered the same; now, tharafara, 3ae it REu�cii,VED, Tt,at_ tr,a t�'a oi the City a� 5aint P�u_ �oe� hereby �r�er �ha� tne s�c=re-ciescrih�d im�revement be m&de, ar.� the presper City efficers ara 3xere�;= :2irected and authorizad to proaeed with ths improvement; and be it FURTIiER RE36LVED, Tnat upoxi the acmpleLic+n of said iaiprovement, tize proper City officars shai3 caloui��s ail exrzr.sc�s inc�arre� therein and shall rerort �lze same to the City Council in accordance with C�apter 14 of the City �harter. Ye Pa�ys �T�la7�:.v .. �strom �arr_s M D'P�a � 'r yBPu a_.i— ✓ -�� =CoIL.a �aune L Sn Faeor _Q��$ins� Adopted by Council: Date `��j� \�� C�rtifiecs' Psa�e� by �3ur.cii ��r�rEt�ry ,.� �yar Public -Hearir<g Date — May 28, 1997 RE 3-21-97 �l�—�p�� DEPAFTMENT/OFFICEtt;4UNCIL DA7EINRIATED GREEN SHEET No. 32226 Public Works Sidewalks 2-25-9� INITIAUDATE iNrcwwnrE CONTACTPEIiSONBPHONE �DFPARTMENTDIFECTOF ❑CfTYCOUNCIL Robert A Lissick - 266-6086 ��N CITY ATTORNEY �CfTYCLERK NUM9EH WH MUST BE ON COUNCIL AGENDA 6Y (DATEj !}—()—(j ] ROU7ING � g�p�E7 DIRECTOR � FIN. & MGT. SEflVICES DIF. Must be in Council Research Office � MAYOfl(ORASSISTAN'n 1�Counal Research b noon Frida 3-28-97 ❑ TOTALtOF31GIWNpEPAGES 1 _ (CL{VALLLOCAl(ONSFORSIGNANREti �RSSOCIAlE AR7AIENTM1�aCCIX1tl�ANT ACTIONflEWES7ED � a - 7 Reconstruct Sidewalk in Ward 5��ee attached list) F1t.5.iYD• O 2 RECOAIMENDATIONS: Appmve (y w Rejec[ (fll pEpSONAL SERVICE COMRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS: PLANNING COAIMISSION _ CNIL SERYICE CAMMI$$ION 1. Has if1i5 pef50Nf1 N Vdf Nrolked Ufldel 8 COn[iett fOf Ihls d2Flaltrneftt? Y CIB COMMIT'fEE Z Has Utis pe[SOnR�n ever heen a dty efllployee? — — YES NO A SiAFf 3. Does �his persaVfirm possess a skill not rrormalty possessed by any wrtent city employee? _ DISTR�T CouNCIL �y� S (. �P��n all yes nswars on separate sheat and atWeh to green sheet SUPPOHTS WHK)H COUNCIL OBJECTNE? NE� w MlITIpTINCa PR08LEM, ISSUE.OPPOR7UNIT' (NMO, Nh1AT, NE . WHERE. WFfn: The problem "defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, aRernating freeRhaw cycles, service life limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occ�r on a citywide level and must be addressed and corrected o� an a��uat basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusable and subjed to increased pedestrian injuries from falis and possible Idigations. ADVANTAGESIFAPPROVED: The communi[y will benefit from this project because it will provide safe detect free sidewalks for its many citizens. The sidewalk contracts are executed by private contractors, so it follows that private sector jobs are created as a resuft of this activity. DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED: Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment. Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it still remains controversial. ��'w,r s.E _.,,.m� �,`s P `'�v�' � �. ��ti: �:4 (J a lb�� DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED: This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in'ttirm,-wifl }enerate mote_personal,�njury suits, uftimately resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in eventual repairs and/or replacement, as well as claim payouts. TOTALAM�UNT�FTRANSACTlONS � S � 3•00 �ST/flEVENUEBUDGETED(CIRCLEONE) YES NO FUNDINGSOURCE 9]mNf^06�] A PPA 97 = 557.040 ACITVffYNUMBER C97-2T729-0784-27012 FINANCIAL INPORMATION: (EXPLAIN) S � AST Q = 300 a 000 C� CCB J/ = SQxOOO S5�o3z SUMMAR.Y OF ENGINEERING RECOMMEI3UATION �—` �-�� Ward 5 PROJECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK E.S. JACKSON ST. from Granite St. to Cayuga St. & S.S. CAYLTGA ST. from Jackson St. to Agate St. at 856 Jackson St. Only. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessify on the basis of two (2) complaints, a petition with one (1) signer and an inspectian of the waik. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, settled and cracked panels. ................................................................... 59�o3z. SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATIONS G Ward 6 PRO�IECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALg N.S. JENKS AVE. from Weide St. to Arcade St. at 991 Arcade St. Only. Il�iITIATiNG ACTION; This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint, a petition with one (1} signer and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with water pockets, offgrade and settled panels. ................................................................... PROJECT• RECONSTI2UCT SIDEWALK E.S. PAYNE AVE. from Railroad 17acks to Wadena Ave. at 844 Payne Ave. Only. I1IRTIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with asphalt patches and setfled panels. ................................................................... �59 � o3z� SiIMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATIONS C1�—�p Ward 7 PROJECT• RECOi�SSTRUCT SIDEWALg S.S. AI.GONQUIN AVE. from Nokomis Ave. to Iroquois Ave. at 838 Iroquois Ave. Only. II�RTIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of one {1) complaint, a petition with one (1) signer and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with asphalt patches and settled panels. ................................................................... PROJECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK W.S. NORTOrTIA AVE. from Escanaba Ave. to Stiliwater Ave. at 2130 Stillwater Ave. Only. IPTITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of two (2) complaints, a petition with one (1) signer and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves and asphalt patches. ................................................................... PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK N.S. ROSS AVE. from Waukon Ave. to N. Howard St. at 2189 Ross Ave. Only. IriITIATING ACTION: This order was intiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of a petition with one (1) signer and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITION�: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves and asphalt patches. n CITY OR ST. PAUL BRELIMINARY ORD�R � In Favor I� the Matter oE Reconstruction of �idayrslk at 85F� �7�_r.k�on St., 991 Arr_.�de St. 894 Payne Ave., S3$ Iroquois Ave., 2130 StillwatEr Ave. axzd 2189 Ross Ave. u: � � . � �. j3�,�jpF.NT__ IFT�. RATF.4 (Qne, two or three family structuree) Reconstruation (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.95 per front foot for a five (5) fo�t roride walk and $H.94 per front £aot for A 91Y. (6y foot wide walk. All Cther widths will be prorated accc,rdinyly. New aonstruation (where no walk er.isCed) - 100& of ttxe actual cc�st estimated to be approximately $3.33 per �quare foot. All corner residential propertias will receive a credit up to the firat 15p feet ef new or reconstructed sidewalk elong and abuttiny the "long side" c�f the property. MtJr.Tr-__ PF (More than three family strurturea}, IsON-�R7DFNT7__�1_�AmFq Fvr new and recanstructed sidewalk; 100� �f actual cvst estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square f�ot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered 3aid report, hereby re9olvea: 1. That the �aid report and the same is hereby approvsd with na alternative�, and that the estimated cost thereof is iSEE ABUVE for estimated construction rate�, financed b}= assessments and 1997 Fublic Improvement Aid. 2 3 That a public hearing be had an said improvement on the 2Bth day of May, i997 et 9:30 0' u n M _ in the Council chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of 8aint Paul. That notice of said public hearinq be given to the peraons and in the manner provided by the charter, stating the time end place �f hearirig, the i7ature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays ��akey ✓k3o5trom ✓�arris � rhor�,J ✓�eqard �ttman V`�iUi1e � Against �� Fa � 1 CU ' FILE � Sf�� y i _, - ✓ _ �� File Pdo. 7 Vo'�.ng W + 5, 6, 7 Adopted by Council: Date��,�,q�� Certified Pas�ed by Ceuncil Secretary BY c� . �� Hieyar � CITY F � � e : o �� a 6_ A[e�€�?lill y - si I a h � �85� - �c6� Saint Paul City Council Public Hearing Notice Public Improvement Construction OWNER OR TAXPAYER � �� c�-b c7 COUNCIL DISTRICT #5,6,7 ,_ PLANNING COUNCIL �02,05,06 ... ...... .... -- FILE � :5�7�3�=:;-:'<::.;;:;=� __--. PROPERTY ADDRESS PARCEL ID ..:,...:::,r:-;;: . .... .... .:.:. ... ``:-:�?::,,':;�:.._:;: PROPERTY TAX DESCRIPTION THE TIME: WEDNESDAY, MAY 28, 1997 AT 4:30 P.M. PUBLIC PLACE: City Council Chambers, 3rd Floor City Haii-Court House HEARING Written or oral statements by any owner will be considered by the Council at this hearing. PURPOSE ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT INFORMATION ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT CALCULATION To consider approval of the proposed project as foilows: RECONSTRUCTION OF SIDEWALK AT 856 JACKSON STREE7, 991 ARCADE STREE7, 844 PAYNE AVENUE, 838 IROQUOIS AVENUE, 2130 STILLWATER AVENUE AND 2759 ROSS AVENUE. if the City Council approves the project, ali or part of the cost wili be assessed against the benefitted properties. The ESTIMATED assessment for the above property is NOTE: THIS IS NOT A BILL! Please see PAYMENT INFORMATiON on the reverse side of this notice. F _. ; - r , � _ . _ �:.�� .� �� . . -, . . . ..._, y� .��' CONTINUED ON REVERSE SIDE NOTIFICATION DATE: 05/o9/s7 �-� b ��•sz�,�� RESIDENTiAL- RATES (One, two or three family structures) - ��coa iiict�a� (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.45 per front foot K��srv.'vNV✓x:0� Por a five (5) foot wide sidewalk and $8.94 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide sidewalk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. i4es�;n�oas�iuc�ioii (where no walk existed) - 100$ of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the 3o�q�:s�i�$ of the property. pJIILTI-RESZDENTIAL (More than thTee family structures) and NONRESI- DENR'IAL RATES - For new � reconstructed sidewalk: 100% of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. g3,EASE NoTE: Reconstruction will be at the existing width. Public Works will reconstruct some existing sidewalk that is 6 feet wide down to 5 feet wide in all cases where this is practical. This smaller width (5 feet) is to keep the assessment at the lowest rate. If your walk is 6 feet wide and you and your neighbors prefer that width and are willing to accept the higher assessment rate, please contact the Sidewalk Division at 266-6120 to request your preference. All:",�netiv�;:�sidei.�alks';�wii;l��e='�constrilcte3�::5�� fee ° tii3d � ,� z:. .__......_....r_......,......_....,..�....,..,�5 _. Sidewalk reconstruction may consist of replacing from one panel to all of the panels in front of your property. The ES2IMATED ASSESSMENT CALCBLATION on your notice shows the number of feet to be replaced. For questions regarding the construction and/or reconstruction of your sidewalk, please call 266-6120. � y 8t � . ►` ' . . 5 .} � CSTY �R ST. PAUL tr�var- ORDER �: �, 7 Ir� the Matter cf R�r_.ca�Lnictiti:n ci �iu'e�+°al'� ai. 35r, Jack3 n�t-, �g2 �ic�u� �t, 894 �a_yrie Aue,, i33is S�GQll07.3 Ave., 21s0 S�].�.IV7�CEY' AYE. 82Yd ZZ$� i'toss Aee. � .5t( i ►, � h'F.�TL7 pd'�'TaT AT .''' {(_Yle, '�WO Oi thrBB faIIl.li_Y s't.�llCtUi'23i , Recansi-suatian {replacement af o2d-sidewalk) -$?.A5 per� frant foot fcr a fiv� {5} foot wide walk and $8.44 per frant foot for a six (6p paot wide waik. Z�1 other wi�ths will be prarate�' according]:y:' New eonstruation {where no walk existedt - S40% af the actusl aost estimateci to be aggr�xi�atel� r3.33 p�r sc;uar� foc±, P11 corner reaidentiai praperties will receive a aredit up to the tirst 150 fP4?�C c�f net+r or z�ecc�nstrurted sidew�lk sio�?g and &T�utiing the R7ong sida�* of the prngerty. s r T - F4'T � tdTr i{Mor� th�n three famil r struotur��} , N'u �°�I;} .g3`��;, ��T��x �or nEw snd reecnstruatEd sidawalle; 3000 �f �etusl cast �stimate� t� ha agproxi?nstely $4.50 ger squase foot. u�xder Prel�tinary �r�nr �' \ — 3 y �, �AFrc �� o� � 1 �.—�__ The Council of th� City vf Saint Peu1 h�s c�r.dusvts� � guhlic heasing u�*r. n che above improvesrtent, a�ue rzotiae theraef lxaviny been giver� as �rescribed �y rhe City Chz�rter; and ��, The Colnail I heard all p7�i30II8, objactians an� rECammendaUiona pertaining ta «aid proposed improvement anc2 has fully considered the same; now, tharafara, 3ae it REu�cii,VED, Tt,at_ tr,a t�'a oi the City a� 5aint P�u_ �oe� hereby �r�er �ha� tne s�c=re-ciescrih�d im�revement be m&de, ar.� the presper City efficers ara 3xere�;= :2irected and authorizad to proaeed with ths improvement; and be it FURTIiER RE36LVED, Tnat upoxi the acmpleLic+n of said iaiprovement, tize proper City officars shai3 caloui��s ail exrzr.sc�s inc�arre� therein and shall rerort �lze same to the City Council in accordance with C�apter 14 of the City �harter. Ye Pa�ys �T�la7�:.v .. �strom �arr_s M D'P�a � 'r yBPu a_.i— ✓ -�� =CoIL.a �aune L Sn Faeor _Q��$ins� Adopted by Council: Date `��j� \�� C�rtifiecs' Psa�e� by �3ur.cii ��r�rEt�ry ,.� �yar Public -Hearir<g Date — May 28, 1997 RE 3-21-97 �l�—�p�� DEPAFTMENT/OFFICEtt;4UNCIL DA7EINRIATED GREEN SHEET No. 32226 Public Works Sidewalks 2-25-9� INITIAUDATE iNrcwwnrE CONTACTPEIiSONBPHONE �DFPARTMENTDIFECTOF ❑CfTYCOUNCIL Robert A Lissick - 266-6086 ��N CITY ATTORNEY �CfTYCLERK NUM9EH WH MUST BE ON COUNCIL AGENDA 6Y (DATEj !}—()—(j ] ROU7ING � g�p�E7 DIRECTOR � FIN. & MGT. SEflVICES DIF. Must be in Council Research Office � MAYOfl(ORASSISTAN'n 1�Counal Research b noon Frida 3-28-97 ❑ TOTALtOF31GIWNpEPAGES 1 _ (CL{VALLLOCAl(ONSFORSIGNANREti �RSSOCIAlE AR7AIENTM1�aCCIX1tl�ANT ACTIONflEWES7ED � a - 7 Reconstruct Sidewalk in Ward 5��ee attached list) F1t.5.iYD• O 2 RECOAIMENDATIONS: Appmve (y w Rejec[ (fll pEpSONAL SERVICE COMRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS: PLANNING COAIMISSION _ CNIL SERYICE CAMMI$$ION 1. Has if1i5 pef50Nf1 N Vdf Nrolked Ufldel 8 COn[iett fOf Ihls d2Flaltrneftt? Y CIB COMMIT'fEE Z Has Utis pe[SOnR�n ever heen a dty efllployee? — — YES NO A SiAFf 3. Does �his persaVfirm possess a skill not rrormalty possessed by any wrtent city employee? _ DISTR�T CouNCIL �y� S (. �P��n all yes nswars on separate sheat and atWeh to green sheet SUPPOHTS WHK)H COUNCIL OBJECTNE? NE� w MlITIpTINCa PR08LEM, ISSUE.OPPOR7UNIT' (NMO, Nh1AT, NE . WHERE. WFfn: The problem "defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, aRernating freeRhaw cycles, service life limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occ�r on a citywide level and must be addressed and corrected o� an a��uat basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusable and subjed to increased pedestrian injuries from falis and possible Idigations. ADVANTAGESIFAPPROVED: The communi[y will benefit from this project because it will provide safe detect free sidewalks for its many citizens. The sidewalk contracts are executed by private contractors, so it follows that private sector jobs are created as a resuft of this activity. DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED: Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment. Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it still remains controversial. ��'w,r s.E _.,,.m� �,`s P `'�v�' � �. ��ti: �:4 (J a lb�� DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED: This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in'ttirm,-wifl }enerate mote_personal,�njury suits, uftimately resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in eventual repairs and/or replacement, as well as claim payouts. TOTALAM�UNT�FTRANSACTlONS � S � 3•00 �ST/flEVENUEBUDGETED(CIRCLEONE) YES NO FUNDINGSOURCE 9]mNf^06�] A PPA 97 = 557.040 ACITVffYNUMBER C97-2T729-0784-27012 FINANCIAL INPORMATION: (EXPLAIN) S � AST Q = 300 a 000 C� CCB J/ = SQxOOO S5�o3z SUMMAR.Y OF ENGINEERING RECOMMEI3UATION �—` �-�� Ward 5 PROJECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK E.S. JACKSON ST. from Granite St. to Cayuga St. & S.S. CAYLTGA ST. from Jackson St. to Agate St. at 856 Jackson St. Only. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessify on the basis of two (2) complaints, a petition with one (1) signer and an inspectian of the waik. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, settled and cracked panels. ................................................................... 59�o3z. SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATIONS G Ward 6 PRO�IECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALg N.S. JENKS AVE. from Weide St. to Arcade St. at 991 Arcade St. Only. Il�iITIATiNG ACTION; This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint, a petition with one (1} signer and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with water pockets, offgrade and settled panels. ................................................................... PROJECT• RECONSTI2UCT SIDEWALK E.S. PAYNE AVE. from Railroad 17acks to Wadena Ave. at 844 Payne Ave. Only. I1IRTIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with asphalt patches and setfled panels. ................................................................... �59 � o3z� SiIMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATIONS C1�—�p Ward 7 PROJECT• RECOi�SSTRUCT SIDEWALg S.S. AI.GONQUIN AVE. from Nokomis Ave. to Iroquois Ave. at 838 Iroquois Ave. Only. II�RTIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of one {1) complaint, a petition with one (1) signer and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with asphalt patches and settled panels. ................................................................... PROJECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK W.S. NORTOrTIA AVE. from Escanaba Ave. to Stiliwater Ave. at 2130 Stillwater Ave. Only. IPTITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of two (2) complaints, a petition with one (1) signer and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves and asphalt patches. ................................................................... PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK N.S. ROSS AVE. from Waukon Ave. to N. Howard St. at 2189 Ross Ave. Only. IriITIATING ACTION: This order was intiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of a petition with one (1) signer and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITION�: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves and asphalt patches. n CITY OR ST. PAUL BRELIMINARY ORD�R � In Favor I� the Matter oE Reconstruction of �idayrslk at 85F� �7�_r.k�on St., 991 Arr_.�de St. 894 Payne Ave., S3$ Iroquois Ave., 2130 StillwatEr Ave. axzd 2189 Ross Ave. u: � � . � �. j3�,�jpF.NT__ IFT�. RATF.4 (Qne, two or three family structuree) Reconstruation (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.95 per front foot for a five (5) fo�t roride walk and $H.94 per front £aot for A 91Y. (6y foot wide walk. All Cther widths will be prorated accc,rdinyly. New aonstruation (where no walk er.isCed) - 100& of ttxe actual cc�st estimated to be approximately $3.33 per �quare foot. All corner residential propertias will receive a credit up to the firat 15p feet ef new or reconstructed sidewalk elong and abuttiny the "long side" c�f the property. MtJr.Tr-__ PF (More than three family strurturea}, IsON-�R7DFNT7__�1_�AmFq Fvr new and recanstructed sidewalk; 100� �f actual cvst estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square f�ot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered 3aid report, hereby re9olvea: 1. That the �aid report and the same is hereby approvsd with na alternative�, and that the estimated cost thereof is iSEE ABUVE for estimated construction rate�, financed b}= assessments and 1997 Fublic Improvement Aid. 2 3 That a public hearing be had an said improvement on the 2Bth day of May, i997 et 9:30 0' u n M _ in the Council chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of 8aint Paul. That notice of said public hearinq be given to the peraons and in the manner provided by the charter, stating the time end place �f hearirig, the i7ature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays ��akey ✓k3o5trom ✓�arris � rhor�,J ✓�eqard �ttman V`�iUi1e � Against �� Fa � 1 CU ' FILE � Sf�� y i _, - ✓ _ �� File Pdo. 7 Vo'�.ng W + 5, 6, 7 Adopted by Council: Date��,�,q�� Certified Pas�ed by Ceuncil Secretary BY c� . �� Hieyar � CITY F � � e : o �� a 6_ A[e�€�?lill y - si I a h � �85� - �c6� Saint Paul City Council Public Hearing Notice Public Improvement Construction OWNER OR TAXPAYER � �� c�-b c7 COUNCIL DISTRICT #5,6,7 ,_ PLANNING COUNCIL �02,05,06 ... ...... .... -- FILE � :5�7�3�=:;-:'<::.;;:;=� __--. PROPERTY ADDRESS PARCEL ID ..:,...:::,r:-;;: . .... .... .:.:. ... ``:-:�?::,,':;�:.._:;: PROPERTY TAX DESCRIPTION THE TIME: WEDNESDAY, MAY 28, 1997 AT 4:30 P.M. PUBLIC PLACE: City Council Chambers, 3rd Floor City Haii-Court House HEARING Written or oral statements by any owner will be considered by the Council at this hearing. PURPOSE ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT INFORMATION ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT CALCULATION To consider approval of the proposed project as foilows: RECONSTRUCTION OF SIDEWALK AT 856 JACKSON STREE7, 991 ARCADE STREE7, 844 PAYNE AVENUE, 838 IROQUOIS AVENUE, 2130 STILLWATER AVENUE AND 2759 ROSS AVENUE. if the City Council approves the project, ali or part of the cost wili be assessed against the benefitted properties. The ESTIMATED assessment for the above property is NOTE: THIS IS NOT A BILL! Please see PAYMENT INFORMATiON on the reverse side of this notice. F _. ; - r , � _ . _ �:.�� .� �� . . -, . . . ..._, y� .��' CONTINUED ON REVERSE SIDE NOTIFICATION DATE: 05/o9/s7 �-� b ��•sz�,�� RESIDENTiAL- RATES (One, two or three family structures) - ��coa iiict�a� (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.45 per front foot K��srv.'vNV✓x:0� Por a five (5) foot wide sidewalk and $8.94 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide sidewalk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. i4es�;n�oas�iuc�ioii (where no walk existed) - 100$ of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the 3o�q�:s�i�$ of the property. pJIILTI-RESZDENTIAL (More than thTee family structures) and NONRESI- DENR'IAL RATES - For new � reconstructed sidewalk: 100% of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. g3,EASE NoTE: Reconstruction will be at the existing width. Public Works will reconstruct some existing sidewalk that is 6 feet wide down to 5 feet wide in all cases where this is practical. This smaller width (5 feet) is to keep the assessment at the lowest rate. If your walk is 6 feet wide and you and your neighbors prefer that width and are willing to accept the higher assessment rate, please contact the Sidewalk Division at 266-6120 to request your preference. All:",�netiv�;:�sidei.�alks';�wii;l��e='�constrilcte3�::5�� fee ° tii3d � ,� z:. .__......_....r_......,......_....,..�....,..,�5 _. Sidewalk reconstruction may consist of replacing from one panel to all of the panels in front of your property. The ES2IMATED ASSESSMENT CALCBLATION on your notice shows the number of feet to be replaced. For questions regarding the construction and/or reconstruction of your sidewalk, please call 266-6120.